EU Commission

EU Disintegrating. A Soros Legacy?

Posted on by Helena

With the advent of BREXIT and the rumbling of other nations who debate the same strategy in order to alleviate the Power Bloc of the EU on their shoulders, the European Commission has stated that they are going to gobble up 6 Balkan nations:   Serbia, Bosnia, North Macedonia, Kosovo, Albania, and Montenegro.

What could possibly go wrong?

There are only nine countries within the EU that have a positive net contribution; Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark UK, Finland, Netherlands and Sweden.   The remaining nineteen countries have a negative ‘net contribution’.   The UK’s contribution was roughly 12%.   Brining in 6 Balkan countries whose economies are growing but have exceptionally high unemployment and extremely low GDP per capita (lower than Turkey) – would not seem a sound business decision. The EU net contribution would be a negative meaning the eight countries would not only be making up for the loss of the UK, they would be footing the bill for an additional six countries.

So why does the EU want to add them as member states?

France has consistently objected. In order to acquiesce that veto, the Commission is looking to ‘modify’ the rules.   To some extent, it appears symbolic more than anything else. A means to give the appearance of a larger EU, a growing EU, with greater power and oversight.   However, larger economies currently within the union are emboldened by BREXIT and rumblings of additional succession include Italy, Spain, and Poland.   Why?   Because the rules have become a corset.

Immigration has certainly been a sticking point, austerity packages are another.   But even the once stable economies of the EU are wobbling. France has undergone a massive downward spiral as a result of the riots and protests that have been ongoing for nearly 18 months. Economic growth for 2019 is looking to come in at 1.2% with projections of greater crashes in 2020 as the impact spirals. How will this impact their ability to fund the negative ‘net contributions’ ?

The entire foundation of the EU has proven a failure.

The European Union was founded just 28 years ago in 1992 by the signing of the Maastricht Treaty initiated by the Netherlands which came into effect in 1993. The original signatories were; West Germany, Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Italy and Luxembourg.   The UK joined in 1993 – just over one year after Soros ‘broke the bank of England’.   Was that Soros way of coercing Britain to join?

In 1994 the first EU elections were held ushering in the Socialist Party as the main pillar. The euro was created in 1999 when Germany joined the European Union.

Today, the EU is facing a potential demise parallel to Venezuela only on a larger scale.   Protests are aflame across France and Germany the two main partners that hold the EU together.   Sweden is 3rd world and The Netherlands will soon follow as exodus of their youth has left them with an aging society fueled by untrained, angry immigrants.

Soros, the backbone of the EU is old, and likely suffering from advanced dementia. While he periodically appears on some media platform making a scripted statement, it is highly unlikely that the failures attributed to the US democrats , UK Remainers, and the out of control protests across the EU, are his doing, but rather his son’s, Alexander Soros.

Alexander is no one to mess with, but he not George.

It takes years of cunning to master the manipulation and fraud that George, aka Gyorgy Schwartz, forged.   But given today’s climate, given President Trump, given the wisdom of age worn by Putin and Jinping even, Alexander is no match.   And the latest gaffs and failures are proof positive that the horse has turned into a donkey.

Of course, trying to train a son in the art of world domination is no easy task, and with a father that is most probably mentally incapacitated, Alexander is spinning.

Of course, Alexander is not the only son being groomed, it is likely that Trump Jr. is also being educated in the interim as President Trump knows that this second four years will be his last and a replacement is necessary.

Xi Jinping has one child, a daughter. Unfortunately, her education was attained at the ever Liberal Socialist agenda, Harvard.   Putin has two daughters, neither of which seem to have any desire to engage in their father’s legacy. But it has become an essential ingredient in the near future to find the perfect replacement who can battle the demons, the reptilian forces that would seek to create a Socialist/Communist world.

As such, a President Trump in the forthcoming 2020 election would seem to be the accepted quoi encore and not fait accompli.   And thus the chess game would be – then what.

Turkey Bombs Syria – while the MSM world blames Trump

Posted on by Helena

Trump is pulling US troops out of northern Syria and according to Germany’s Deutsche Welle, the US is guilty of abandoning its friends the Kurds and allowing ISIS to re-infiltrate Syria.   What DW does not say is that friendly relations with Turkey extend throughout most of Europe including Denmark, Ireland, Hungary, Italy, France, the Holy See, etc…   So it would appear the Kurds have no allies in Europe.  But it is all Trump’s fault…

In fact, Germany’s Kurdish population is estimated at 1.5 million, whereas the US population hovers closer to 20,000. So why isn’t the EU defending the Kurds? The EU Commissioner has ‘affirmed their commitment’… The same EU that bombed Syria.

What is the real story?  

Syria has released a statement asking the EU, UN and other human rights agencies to take action against Turkey – no mention of the US.   In the event that Turkey continues its offensive, Syria has announced its intentions to defend itself. That could indicate a brutal uprising, and securing US troops from a central position in this front would be a responsible action. The number of troops affected is estimated to be between 50 and 100, not a battalion.   The US was not positioned to withstand a new offensive war.

Saudi Arabia has stepped up to the plate to take over the defense of the northern Syria Kurds. Given the relationship between Trump and Prince Muhammad bin Salman, it is likely an agreement was instituted wherein the Middle East would take care of their own.   The majority of Kurds are Sunni.  And the US needs to concentrate its resources on the US – for a change.

In an interesting twist, Russia, one of Turkey’s most vocal allies, has condemned Turkey for violating Syria’s sovereignty and called their attacks ‘criminal’.  Iran opposes Turkey’s aggression.   Greece and Cyprus have condemned the belligerence. Turkey has found itself with NO ally, instigating violence, and will likely find itself at the center of retaliation.

In the midst of this bizarre implosion, Erdogan has stated that 3.6 million Syrian refugees currently in various camps across the country, will be replenished. With Germany warning of a massive influx of new refugees, it would appear the true equation is more clear.   Turkey is going to unleash a new swathe of immigrants descending on the EU and they are miffed because the US isn’t stopping the invasion by declaring war on Turkey.

The EU has no army. And Germany is already spending over $10 billion Euro’s annually to support its current influx of refugee population.   There is no money left. And so, our once upon a time ‘ally’, that never really was, is further alienating the US by attempting to vilify Trump. That would be Merkel’s version of asking for help before another 3 million refugees descend.

Still, the Liberal war mongers in DC and the media are using this ‘reassignment of troops’ as a point argument of Trump’s incompetency.   We The People, both liberal and conservative have long demanded the US get out of the Middle East conflicts. Yet, the politicians are not listening. Trump is!

While the MSM is busily derailing Trump, the real story surrounds the absolute idiocy of Erdogan in pursuing this assault. Without an ally, Turkey is subjecting itself to severe consequences the likes of which could erupt in mass exodus, civil riots, and human rights violations that could easily spiral the country into chaos.

The US is not responsible to act in the capacity of global police on behalf of the inept EU, but that message seems gray when the liberal peacemakers choose to decry Bomb em ALL!

WORLD TRADE WAR: TRUMP WINS

Posted on by Helena

The EU Commission is backtracking their previous rejected deal with Theresa May and claiming that the no-deal BREXIT really means the rejected deal that gave them $46 billion is the best solution for all… according to Mina Andreeva, a spokesperson.

Certainly $46 billion is a whole lot better than the $9 billion they would likely get in the Johnson no-deal deal.   Of course, resurrecting a ‘rejected’ deal would legally be starting from scratch.   But in the mélange of chaos, the EU Commission would seem to be grasping and gasping – albeit too late.

All economic indicators now rally behind an impending recession for Germany. Given they are the stalwart economy behind the EU, where Germany goes, everyone else follows.

The primary cause of Germany’s implosion is trade not BREXIT.   Industrial output has tanked, primarily in the auto and machine parts industries. Merkel’s outright refusal to negotiate a fair trade with the US having been advised that in so doing she could create a German recession – is simply corrupt.

But allies can sometimes reveal the wolf behind the mask.   Germany is not a US ally, Germany milked the US economy for decades.

The US/China trade war tipped the balance, and Germany remained staunch and unmoving.

Timing is everything.

If the UK remainers win, the UK will derail with Germany and France.   They will be boarding a sinking ship. Short-sighted, ramping up trade with the US would be an economic win.   But sometimes, pride and principle are fervent manufacturers of destruction.

While the socialists in the EU argue against Trump’s tariffs, they seem to forget that Trump offered a zero tariff exchange which Germany and the EU snubbed.   Is the EU working for the people?   It would seem not.   And like the rejected BREXIT deal that they want to suddenly reinstate, a zero tariff trade with the US may be the no-deal deal.

Is it the trade deal or is it the ally that wasn’t?

While rejecting the US zero trade deal, the EU simultaneously agreed to zero tariff’s with Japan.   The wolf showed his face.  And the ally that was, revealed it’s true corruption.  The EU wanted an imbalance and it served them well for 30 years.

The US trade balance was at zero up until 1976.   The following 15 years saw the trade balance dip and trough before coming back to zero.   Between 1991 and 2010, the trade balance tanked! Why?

Clintonomics.

Clinton lowered US tariffs which ultimately destroyed US ability to compete in the export and trade markets, particularly with China.   Because while the US lowered its tariffs, other countries did not follow suit which would have been the job of the WTO…   The World Trade Organization, which was originally the General Agreement on Tariffs and Tax, was created to provide an equality, a balance of tariffs among all member countries. Apparently, that nondiscrimination balance didn’t apply to the US.

When Clinton lowered the tariff rate in the US trade disparities began to escalate rapidly to the detriment of the US. In fact, it was a binge selloff with the US trade balance going from zero to -900billion with the speed of a Lamborghini on a German autobahn!

Prior to this binge selloff, US small businesses were a growing, the economic boom of entrepreneurship expanded significantly.   Mom and pop stores changed the face of the US.   But with the advent of Clintonesque cheap imports, these small businesses began to shutter, unable to compete.   The Walmarts of the world took over increasing the trade balance even more as Chinese goods became the mainstay.   And middle class shrunk like Alice.

In 1980 small business start-ups represented 12% of all US companies and employed 4% of workers. Today those numbers are halved. Those companies were The American Dream. That Dream died when Clinton lowered tariffs despite advice from both parties that such a move would destroy US businesses. The World Trade Center obviously did nothing to balance the discrepancies in countries tariffs, and have proven to be a truly non-essential entity.

Back to BREXIT.

The creation of new trade partners invoking a zero tariff policy is the ultimate free-trade deal.   It is the deal that is now in effect with Mexico and Canada. Today China has slipped to third place in US imports with Mexico rising to number 1 and Canada to number 2.   Expanding their economies, Trump’s zero tariff trade is picking up the slack of China imports while contracting their economy.  It is a non-tax trade.

Adding the UK, would provide them with a backstop and relieve the angst of impending doom and gloom that the naysayers of BREXIT fear.  Trump and Johnson have already made arrangements to soften the initial BREXIT wind and create a sovereign economy without the welfare payouts to the EU.

It is change.   Change requires stamina and patience. Fear will only forebode chaos.

Boris Johnson: King Charles I – treason or hero?

Posted on by Helena

Boris Johnson is now being compared to Charles I who was tried and executed for treason.   Oddly, what the media neglects to understand is that Charles’ ‘treason’ was religiously based during the era in which the Puritans and the Catholics were at odds and Charles lean toward Arminian belief in ‘free will’ and Catholicism was deemed – heretical. 

In essence, Charles came up against his parliament and ultimately imprisoned them given their Puritan views were becoming more and more vehement against Charles religious opinions.   The rumblings of assassination were eminent.  Their rule was dissolved, and Charles presided as Monarch over England, Scotland and Ireland without a parliament for 11 years.

While those opposed to BREXIT are asserting that Boris Johnson is implementing a dictatorship coup, in truth he is fighting for The People who voted for BREXIT and against the insane infighting within a corrupt parliament that has dragged on since 2016 with absolutely no result.

Theresa May’s legacy obliterated, Johnson vowed to uphold the majority vote.   Corbyn and the Soros agenda want a ‘new and improved’ referendum which will likely be rigged.   The obvious question being – why? Why would a new referendum be necessary when there is no allegation of impropriety in the first?

Ultimately, Charles was tried for treason despite the House of Lords objections. The Rump Parliament self declared their power and right to trial and execution.   The charges held Charles acted for his sole purpose in igniting the English Civil War. However, the war was a power play, and the execution of Charles was upheld later to be without merit.

In fact the Rump Parliament, the Puritans, perpetrated ‘a coup’.

If Corbyn and the never BREXITeers were to read the history of Charles I, they might find it necessary to backtrack on their assertion against Johnson given the coup was not invoked by Charles, but by Oliver Cromwell, head of the English Army and a devout Puritan.

Winston Churchill called Cromwell a military dictator. His tolerance of English and Irish Catholics was considered genocidal.

The article in The Guardian by John Rees, completely omits the most relevant frame of the rule of Charles I which was ‘religious freedom’.   He provides a very superfluous narrative recounting a ‘radical mood’ and masses of Londoners.   In fact, the ‘radical mood’ was the Puritans desire to eradicate the Catholics. As in genocide.

Charles I would actually be a somewhat positive declaration in that regard. He advocated to rid his parliament of the radicals, so that his duties as King and warrior could be officiated.

Johnson’s parliament is incompetent. They have demonstrated that fact for the last 3 years.   They are incapable of making a decision with respect to BREXIT and thus have done absolutely nothing during their past three year tenure as a government whose duty is to work for the people.   They have fought, cursed, and been brought to forcible eviction with flailing fists.   The English gentleman – has died.

Instead Rees invokes the claim that businesses demand a deal.  Actually, businesses have already prepped for a no-deal, they’ve had 3 years to do so!

John Rees claims that the Tory-Brexiteers did not vote for a Trump-Johnson no deal.  Which is true.  BREXIT quite simply was a vote to stay or leave the EU.   There was no talk of trade deals, costs, blackmail by the EU Commission, or fees.   That is, until the EU realized they lost and they were up shitake creek!   With 72% turnout, Leave won.   And Remainers act much like Hillary, unable to accept their loss.

With three years now wasted, Boris Johnson is effecting the vote of the people amidst a somewhat convoluted EU Commission attempt to extort money from the UK in an effort to convince them that leaving isn’t worth the cost.  But the people are weary of an ineffectual parliament and want to go on with their lives.

Enter Trump. Trump offers Boris logistical trade deals to help take the smack out of the bite. And the Leavers are hysterical!   Why? Because their argument just tanked. I’m surprised they haven’t called Boris a racist, or Hitler, perhaps that will be their next comical ploy…

In essence, in order for the UK economy to get its footing back, a hard BREXIT is the only way that can be effected. They have floundered in limbo for too long.   With other EU countries flailing miserably in their own economic woes, the EU Commission has lost its position of power. Having rejected every offer brought to the table, they had no intention of ever accepting anything less than a new referendum in which the people voted to stay.

They lost their poker hand and had no more chips.

Know when to hold em, know when to fold em, know when to walk away, and know when to run…

It is time to RUN

No-Deal BREXIT: The COST

Posted on by Helena

Brussels claims the UK will need to cough up $47.7 billion in a hard BREXIT. PM Johnson claims the number is closer to $8 billion. Who is right?

When Theresa May was PM, she supposedly offered $40 billion to the EU Commission and that was rejected.   Obviously, the art of the deal was to never have a deal. And May was a part of that treason. While the EU continues to use this number as an agreed dollar figure, given there was ‘no agreement’, that number disappears from any future negotiations.  As in – poof.

In other words, the EU Commission may have royally screwed themselves in not making any partial or piecemeal form of agreement within the Theresa May treason. That could have obligated the UK to some form of payment.   But a ‘no deal’ means exactly that, nothing was resolved.   A legal misstep.

And in that, Boris Johnson is correct, the only potential obligation would be the UK’s annual membership fee through 2020.

Most recently, the EU has insinuated that a nonpayment scheme would result in instituting a trade war to punish the UK.   Roughly 35% of UK exports find their way to EU countries. But more significantly, 45% of UK imports come from the EU bloc.   With the economy of Germany tanking, a trade war with the UK would all but collapse the EU. Still, the EU is adamant, “UK will have to pay no deal BREXIT”.

But the UK isn’t arguing that, the argument is how and how much?

The problem? The legal position is unclear, allowing for vast differences of ‘opinion’ as to how and how much.

While May invoked Article 50 in 2016 giving a two year window for negotiations, there is no mandate in that Article for financial reparations.   Article 210(3) discusses the exact template of divorce, but also provides no insight into a financial obligations.   However, some legal opinion states that the UK is subject to trade agreements made by the EU in 2014, which are valid for seven years, placing the UK liable for their unused share – November 1, 2019 thru December 31, 2020, which would amount to 16%.

It is then up to the EU Commission to provide substantive analysis of each and every trade agreement created in 2014 for which the UK would be held responsible, and the amount that remains unpaid in such negotiations.   But that is rather simplistic when one considers the co-mingling of assets – as in a marital divorce.   Those assets far exceed any dollar figure the EU can legally assert against the UK, and will require extensive research and market analysis.

In 2017, the UK’s net contribution to the EU was roughly $9 billion.  If the EU wants to have access to the single market system like Switzerland, it is estimated to cost $3.71 billion per year.   It is based on a flat rate of .2% of GDP.   But someone hasn’t done their math!   In 2017, Switzerland’s GDP was roughly $679 billion. If their contribution rate is .2% – their contribution would only be $1.35billion.

In 2017, the UK GDP was $2.62 trillion. If we impose the same deal as Switzerland, the incorporated trade deal would cost the UK, $5.2 billion per year or about half its current contribution with all the luxuries that are afforded other non-EU members including Switzerland.

In that light, the UK would have no obligation to commit to the Socialist rules and agendas imposed by the EU, would not be propping up faltering economies, and would enjoy the freedom of single market trade.

But during the massive treason exploited by Theresa May, the GDP growth rate for the UK tanked falling recently to negative territory triggered by manufacturing.     France and Germany have also experienced a sharp decline in the GDP since the beginning of 2018.   (Interestingly, Russia’s GDP growth rate has far surpassed that of the EU member states – but the media is silent…).

Forecasts for France and Germany, the EU powerhouses, are glum with high unemployment, low growth, a rising trade imbalance, and high personal and corporate tax rates. They have lost their ‘mojo’.

The EU Commission no longer holds the aces in a poker hand, and PM Johnson and President Trump are all too aware of that truth.

A no-deal BREXIT may have a sluggish start, but given assistance from the US in trade, it would be absolutely disastrous for EU partners to lose the UK as a trade account.   Germany’s economy would tank, France’s would follow, while other lesser trade countries might take advantage of a lucrative deal; Hong Kong, Italy, China, Japan, South Korea, Turkey and UAE, to name a few.

If Germany and France go – so shall the entire EU, as in – poof…

France Digital Tariff…er Tax Blunder

Posted on by Helena

France has stated that it will begin charging a 3% digital tax which will be implemented within 21 days and apply retroactively to January 1, 2019.  While Trump has issued a statement calling for a retaliatory tax on French wine, the tech industry seems eerily quiet. Why?

The tax is designed to specifically target online advertising, online intermediary activities, and the sale of user data.   A study conducted by Deloitte reveals that the reason the techs don’t care is because they will absorb just 5% of the 3%, consumers will pick up 55% and businesses will bear 40%.

So once again, the income redistribution will target consumers and small businesses, not billion dollar tech companies. They yawn.

For France alone they expect to rake in roughly $550 million annually which will be deposited into the government coffers along with their VAT tax, income tax, corporate tax, gas tax, wealth tax, stamp tax, professional tax, residence tax, local tax, payroll tax, gift tax, and land tax.

Interestingly, the amount of tariff/tax imposed on tech companies will likely equal the lost increase in gas tax that caused rioting in the streets for months.

Trump’s response is to tax French wine. The US imports roughly $2.1 billion annually and exports about $435 million.   Of course, Macron and his finance minister are completely incensed that we would even consider such a measure claiming they are imposing a tax, and Trump would be imposing a tariff. It would seem, they don’t understand a tariff by definition is a ‘Tax’.   Vive la France.

So what is really going on?

France’s budget deficit is slated to reach 3.4% of GDP next year, which overshoots the EU limit of 3%. But then France has not had a balanced budget since 1974. The reason for the deficit – France is considered a welfare state, thus Health care, pensions, assistance programs, and education account for the repeated inability to balance.

According to the EU rules that nobody abides by, a country’s debt ratio should not exceed 60%. France’s is 99%.   The consequence? Nothing. The EU notoriously establishes rules but few countries take them seriously and haven’t for decades. It is no different than the Paris Climate Accord wherein the convenient wording is stipulated as “guidelines”. Thus everyone can sign it, but no one is obligated to actually adhere to anything – including Germany.

These inconsistencies are part of the reasoning for BREXIT.   The European Union created a standard that all member countries are to abide by, and yet most simply don’t and haven’t since it’s formation. The Commission is thus another useless government authority collecting wages, accumulating pensions, and doing – nothing.

The companies that will be hit by this newly imposed 3% tariff include: Google, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook. Amazon has stated they applaud the Trump administration for defending fair trade.   The others have given no comment.

While the EU Commission had recently ruled down such a tax, Macron defends his stance stating that France is a sovereign nation and can do whatever it wants.   In addition he stated that between ‘allies’, “we can and we must resolve our disputes without resorting to threats”.

WHAT?

Boris Johnson/Trump Effect: Mad as a Hatter!

Posted on by Helena

With the announcement that Boris Johnson will replace the wholly inept Swamper, Theresa May, the MSM is running in circles trying to redirect from what they already know is about to swallow the UK  – the Trump effect.   While the media act as though Johnson has no clue what he’s stepped into regarding BREXIT, crime, fraud, a failing NHS, etc… they seem oblivious to that fact that Johnson ran for office knowing quite well everything he was facing – and – despite everything he was facing!

Because, like Trump, he wants to FIXIT.

MI6 is just as corrupt as the FBI and CIA under Clinton, Bush and Obama.   It has been a long haul of realizing the purity of evil that exists within these two countries power system.  The ‘conspiracy’ is quite real, and the roof is being blown.   Johnson’s first move?  Clean out the Cabinet.  Get rid of the saucers, and lay down some good old fashioned patriots.  Half the cabinet either left or were fired.

Germany has voiced mixed reviews.  The newly appointed EU Commission President, Ursula Von Der Leyen, has puckered a stiff smile while stating that she/the Commission will not accept any deal regarding BREXIT.  NO one was surprised.

Her own rather bizarre rise in the political arena is a bit unusual given her degree is medical and her dissertation was tainted with multiple charges of plagiarism.

But the inevitable jokes and memes began the moment Johnson took charge.   Ridicule and blasphemy would appear to be the new norm for anyone left of right.   There are no longer boundaries or filters to rein in the donkeys.   Coined by Thomas Nast in his comical portrayal of all things political, the Donkey invariably represented the Ass, the Democrat Party. And it stuck.

You know Johnson’s the right choice when the MSM goes ballistic.   He has pledged a verified BREXIT, with or without a deal, he really doesn’t care.   And the faltering NHS system of nationalized healthcare is in the twalette.  Shortage of doctors, shortage of nurses, shortage of equipment, shortages, as the privatized portion of healthcare has grown by leaps.

While Johnson’s personal life may be blustery and a bit ahem, no one cares.   Focusing on that part of the man has given him the gavel and he is eager to be inline with Trump.  His jokes are tawdry, his humor conventionally British dry, and he has no problem escaping the politically correct humdrum.   And right now, draining the UK Swamp is at the top of the axis.

What the Trump-Johnson team will look like is anyone’s guess, but having a true ally will likely reinstate a hefty trade relationship that has blimped along for decades with the US representing a mere 13% of UK exports.  Of the 54.2% trade within Europe, Germany’s portion has held at just under 10%.   Germany, the US, and China, respectively represent the largest source of UK imports.  But a no-deal BREXIT could easily swamp the levees of change.

Johnson has also revealed that he envisions closer ties with Russia whose alliance could be the final pearl in the oyster as the Swamp is exceedingly fearful that a US, UK, Russia alliance would most certainly be their demise as the casket would be given a proper salute before being pushed into the ominous black depths of the sea.

Russia collusion memes are likely to hyperventilate the media in the mid term as paper bags are handed to crowds of socialist has-beens.  Feel The Bern!

Italy’s hard right Matteo Salvini, expressed great joy at the prospect of working with Johnson, while like Merkel, Trudeau was relatively glumly polite as the world shifts on its axis of evil and lands squarely on point.

Hollywood, pedophiles, and rapists will no longer run our countries.   And the Mad Hatters will grovel back to the hole where they came from:

“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn’t. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn’t be. And what it wouldn’t be, it would. You see?”

~Alice In Wonderland

Russia Stole The EU ELECTIONS? Hardiharhar!

Posted on by Helena

The EU is claiming that Russian friendly social media accounts targeted the EU elections to suppress voter turnout and influence voter preferences by making such grandiose claims as:   1) a decline of western and Christian values in the EU, 2) statements that the corruption scandal that brought down the nationalist party in Austria was the work of Spain and Germany, 3)   highlighting the irrelevance of the European Parliaments powers, and, 4)   unfounded attacks on the EU.

They go on to announce that voter turnout reached a 25 year high.  Odd…

The author(s) of ‘the report’ are never mentioned. But somehow all of the egregious social media statements were considered ‘fake’.   Oddly, that would make me a Russian Bot.   And I am most certainly not.

The social media cited as the sources include; Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, all of which have in place extensive anti-conservative analytics.   Twitter and YouTube have been the latest to suppress any and conservative accounts from gaining any attention, sometimes deleting Tweets without the author even knowing.

The report claims that countries that supported the AfD were particularly targeted by Russian Bots and Trolls given those countries experienced significant gains in nationalist candidates; such as France, Poland and Italy.

But Facebook had already banned all accounts in the EU that it deemed were politically right of center a month before the elections…  Oops.

In other words, if a country actually supports a candidate that is not socialist, that means the people of that country were brainwashed. The NYTimes calls it a DNC Russia hack.

And while gains were made for nationalist and conservative parties, the socialists still control 441 seats out of 701 total, and the communists control 41 seats.  Progress, but not an infiltration.

Jean Claude Juncker, the President of the EU Commission, earns a whopping salary of $36,184 per month = $434,208 annually – not including his insider trade deals. While the PM of Luxembourg, Juncker managed to make his country one of the largest tax havens in the EU, including the pharmaceutical, Glaxo-Smith-Klein, Amazon, and Vodafone. The Luxembourg haven is estimated to be worth over 3-5 trillion Euros. Not bad for a Socialist mentality. And it could be the reason the Socialists continue to claim – this ideology works.

All of this is conjoined under a single term: disinformation. False information intended to mislead and propagandize.

Within that definition such information would include; the Steele/Trump Dossier, New York Times, Washington Post, the DNC, BBC, DW, CNN, CIA, MI5, Google, NBC, Politico, and just about every media outlet on the planet. Because technically, everyone is postulating their opinion –

So why would Russia’s particular ‘disinformation’ be classified differently?

Since 2000, the US has characterized Russia as Authoritarian.   What does that mean?

  1. Limited political pluralism realized with legalistic constraints on the legislature, political parties, and interest groups;
  2. Political legitimacy based upon appeals to emotion, and identification of the regime as a necessary evil to combat enemies of the people, socio-economic underdevelopment, and guerrilla insurgency;
  3. Minimal social mobilization consequent to legalistic constraints, such as political suppression of all anti-regime activities;
  4. Informally defined executive powers, which extend and allow government authority into every sphere of life

These are the core ideologies of the Socialist and Democrat parties across the Globe. Censorship being the most pervasive as all things social media are determined to be ‘disinformation’ if they do not align with the regime of the EU and the Liberals. The Liberal Regime then instates itself as the savior of the people from which all things ‘enemy’.  This would include those who do not align with their respective ideals. And lastly, legalistic constraints are imposed by a slew of NGO’s bent on finding all things a bastion of oppression on – one.

Utilizing the now defunct Soviet Union as an example of authoritarianism, what is not voiced in this historical reference is the fact that the Fall actually occurred with the Russian Revolution wherein the Communist Bolsheviks murdered the monarchy, and therein sustained massive assassinations, murders, and genocide under the tutelage of Marxist Socialism. The same Socialism advocated by the EU, Juncker, and the Liberal parties across the globe today.

Leaders that we have been taught to immortalize, to deify, fall within this advocacy including; Nelson Mandela, Ban Ki Moon, Pope Francis, etc…   That is the true propagandizing, the true ‘disinformation’ that has engulfed our schools, our universities, and our media because the Liberal/Socialist politicians who are the pocket-tools of Banks and Pharma are told what to do, what to say, who to like, and where to spit.

There are a few super-heroes working for The People, Sarah Sanders was a true warrior.

History can be burnt. Truth can be redefined.   But it is undeniable that WWII would never have been won without the aid and massive losses of the Soviet Union.   WWI would never have been won, without the Soviet Union.   I do not purport to support Soviet Russia, any more than I would purport to support Nazi’s, because in essence the Soviets were vying for their own freedom from the suppression brought on by the Socialist/Marxist Bolsheviks that have now become US enemy #1.

Know your history.   Study it well.   The Jesuits.   The Bolsheviks. The Christians who converted to Judaism in order to be money lenders… Don’t be afraid.

The Vatican: Power and Riches

Posted on by Helena

Vatican City is not a member of the EU, not a member of the UN, and not a member of NATO. Yet, according to status granted the Vatican in 1964 as a ‘permanent observer state’, it maintains the authority to influence decisions and recommendations put forth by the UN. The only administration the Holy See is not allowed to perform in the UN is the right to co-sponsor draft decisions or resolutions, and to make points of order or to exercise the right of reply, although it may hold the hand of a member state to do so on its behalf. In some specialized agencies within the UN, the Holy See enjoys full membership status – despite not being a member.

Vatican City is considered a city-state as well as a country, sovereign and subject to International Law.   As a monarchial establishment, in 1983, the Pope unilaterally decided that although Vatican City was referenced as the dominion state for purposes of UN membership, the Holy See represented all Catholics and thus all powers and decisions at the UN reside on his shoulders exclusively. However, the Pope clarified that he may authorize a spokesperson to speak on his behalf at the various conferences and meetings at the UN.

In addition to the UN nonmember membership, The Pope has authority within the: Council of Europe, European Communities, the Organization For Security and Cooperation in Europe, Organization of American States, and the Organization For African Unity.

Although the Holy See and the Vatican vow non-participation in anything outside religious education and human rights, the OSCE is tasked with arms control.   The Organization of American States is involved in political, judicial and economic solutions as well as working to limit conventional weapons. The Council of Europe upholds the ‘rule of law’.   And the European Communities ultimately became the European Commission regulating Coal, Steel, Atomic Energy and all newly acquired adherents, agencies, and interests that the EU Commission afforded itself.

In other words, the Holy See has quite efficiently gained world dominion power while not being an official member of anything. This affords the Vatican the right to nonpayment of fees and dues and precludes the UN and all other associations from demanding financial accounting of Vatican City.

When Notre Dame burned in Paris, the Pope expressed his sadness. While he offered no monetary compensation, he did express that he could advise parts of the reconstruction given his vast knowledge of cathedrals.   While Notre Dame is owned by France, the Catholic diocese has full privileges to use the cathedral for – free.

Originally the UN was created as a response to WWII and only countries that were allies during the war could join. The Big Four were the US, China, Russia and the UK. The belligerents were Germany, Italy, and Japan.

Today, Germany, Italy and Japan have become allies, and China and Russia have become belligerents. Twisted.

Pope Francis has been highly critical of Trump. He has attempted to over-rule Trump’s decisions, specifically the Mexican border wall, climate change, income and wealth inequality, media hypocrisy, and views regarding the NWO which Pope Francis supports.

In essence, despite the rule of law which stipulates a separation of church and state, the Pope maintains authority over every aspect of every country across the globe under the auspices of being a non-member member while completely free from those annoying fees and dues.

While we have really only second guesses and estimates as to the wealth of the Vatican, Vatican Bank manages over $64 billion in assets and it is estimated that the Vatican is the wealthiest organization in world – while demonizing wealth inequality.

The Vatican levies a ‘church tax’ on individual income generated throughout Europe that is deducted from each employees paycheck. It is believed that upwards of 70% of the Vatican’s income is made through this compulsory tax.

Last year the Papal Foundation awarded $15 million in grants and scholarships around the world, mostly to its own organizations, ie churches.   But this is common in the network of NGO’s and Foundations, wherein they basically redistribute their funds to a web of organizations that are connected or subsidiaries of the host organization.   When Zuckerberg gives his own foundation $20 million and the media goes berserk calling him a great philanthropist, what he is doing is redistributing the money, taking a charitable deduction, and then donating 5% of Foundation money to charities and NGO’s aligned with Soros.

The power The Vatican created was a consequence of the Dark Ages. At some point, they realized that as they stood behind the Kings and relayed what the King should do, their power appeared diminished by their lacking vestments.   And thus the finery, the dazzle, and the “papal tiara” were a means of defining their greater authority over the King.

I’ve been to Vatican City.  The massive preservation of artwork that is owned by The Vatican is incredible.   Much of it was procured/gifted by Hitler and the Mafia.  The Vatican is rife with allegations of collaborating with Nazi’s, money laundering, child sex abuse, vanilla sex, and secrecy.   Who ordains this Power?

Shouldn’t entrance to Vatican City – thus – be Free?

EU African Colonial Reparations

Posted on by Helena

With the global flap in the wind Climate Change Fund errr, flapping, the EU has found a new and improved way to prop up their financing the redistribution of wealth agenda – “Colonialism Reparations”.

Another good reason for the UK BREXIT given they could be one of the biggest EU targets…

The gist of the bill is based on EU Afrophobic attacks.  The term, Afrophobic, conjures up  unjust prejudicial and racial ideologies in line with Islamaphobia.  Except that Afrophobia is related to ‘anyone of African descent’.   Each ‘national authority’ would thus be required to provide proper “education, housing, health, criminal justice, political participation and migration”.

The reasoning behind the gem of the bill is that the EU created colonialism and slavery throughout Africa and must be held accountable.

What this bill does not seem to address is the fact that hate crimes can occur against any race or culture including Jews, Whites, Christians, women, etc…  Therefore, creating an African agenda is actually quite blatantly – racial and prejudicial.

What is the real purpose?

  1. It opens the door to possible reparations being made to African states in the form of monetary aid.  Given the fall of funding for Climate Change that was being filtered to Africa, and the need for infrastructure to support the current colonialism land grabs, Africa has lost significant $$$$.   As the cabal took control of large swathes of land in Africa for pennies per hector, pushing out the local farmers, they required infrastructure in order to market their new machinized farms.   The Paris Accord Green Fund flapped, and money dried up.  Thus, a new agenda needed to be created to address the cabal’s need to have funding provided by taxpayers instead of from their own wallets.
  2. It creates an even larger welfare budget within individual EU countries that would become the burden of viable taxpayers further spiraling the EU economy into oblivion.
  3. It demonizes nationals as being the aggressors and victimizes immigrants further suppressing the criminal activities that are decimating entire cities throughout Europe.

The EU Commission rarely operates on a level that is not embedded in an alternate agenda.  And this instance is no different than any other.  The media coverage is slim with respect to hate crimes perpetrated by immigrant Afrikaners.  Most governments, specifically Germany’s, have adopted rules for quashing anything related to immigrant crimes.  The police are forced to release perpetrators, and statistically, they are prohibited from making any arrest which could skew the crime rates.

According to Germany’s Deutsche Welle, there were 800 attacks on Muslims last year.  By contrast, the first nine months of 2018 saw 1000 attacks on Jews.  There are roughly 117,000 Jews in Germany, while there are roughly one million Afrikaners (statistics are not available because Germany does not believe in profiling – numbers are based on an estimate done in 2013 before the massive immigration).

Similarly, in France it is illegal to conduct a census that queries race or color, therefore a proper statistic that would qualify as either Islamaphobia or Afrophobic is completely and utterly impossible.  Making the EU Commission’s bill nonsensical and without a shred of basis.

In addition, given Germany doesn’t profile, the number of attacks on Afrikaners could include black on black which would not be racial at all.

The agenda is obviously far from the purported EU Commission statement.  But as we watch Merkel and the growing possibility of her early resignation, it will be interesting to see where she chooses to reside as her country falls…