Switzerland

Klaus Schwab Reimagining The Fourth Reich Democracy

Posted on by Helena

‘With 63 democracies now outnumbered by 74 autocracies, a new Bertelsmann Foundation report highlights a global shift away from democratic governance, exacerbated by recent geopolitical events and the COVID-19 pandemic.  elections in 25 countries have been less free and fair than they were before, according to the study, which also found that in 39 countries freedom of expression and freedom of the press has been increasingly restricted.”

In that vein, Scotland just announced a new law that calls for the immediate arrest of anyone who posts Gob Speak on social media that is not in alignment with the country’s hate speech definition.  Not Nigeria – Scotland.  Police are being trained to spot the nonpatriotic Scots on social media, in bars, on the streets, in their homes, wherever they may be hiding…

Chile is considered a bastion of ‘democracy’ according to this Bertlesmann Report.   The President, Gabriel Boric, is a Socialist – and his ministers are LGBT.  Despite his landslide win in the Presidential election the young WEF agents approval rating tanked to 30% immediately after he took office… Indicating he was planted.

The Bertlesmann Report is based in Germany and is co-aligned with The Economist Democracy Index.  According to The Economist the only full democracies left include:  Canada, Australia, UK, Japan, Greenland, France, Sweden, The Netherlands, Belgium and Germany.   These are the countries whose governments have submit their goyim-cattle to the Protocols.   Every other country is considered flawed, hybrid or authoritarian.   Of course, Russia stands out as the worst country across the globe –

Every country wherein the index is viewed by Bertlesmann ‘experts’ as perfection is in actualiyty a Marxist run country.  The primary basis for the Index determination is election fraud.  Of the 196 countries on earth, 10 have free and fair elections according to The Economist.

Nearly every google entry declares that The Protocols are fake.   The main reasoning?  Because they speak ill of Jews.  Yet they align perfectly with the World Economic Forum Goals – as created by Klaus Schwab – a Jew who claims to have been raised Roman Catholic.  Schwab’s father collaborated with the WWII Nazi’s through his company, Escher Wyss, yet was never remanded or disciplined for this terrorism.   Why?  Schwab’s wife, Hilde Stoll, is also of Jewish heritage.

In working in conjunction with The Club of Rome, Schwab was schooled in the ideology that global warming, pollution, famine, etc… were of no consequence to the planet and realized that the real enemy is humanity itself.   Therefore, if earth is to survive, the vast majority of humanity – must die.  And this belief was put in practice via Big Pharma, Bill Gates and The Zion Military.

The collusion that both Schwab and Soros share in their Nazi aligned histories despite their Jewish race is an interesting contrast to the Hollywood inspired factoid that the Holocaust was about Jews.  But it wasn’t just Schwab who took refuge in Switzerland, Henri de Rothschild also found safety in Switzerland.   How?   Switzerland was not bombed by the Nazis, however, it was bombed by “Allied Forces” who sought to deter their Nazi allegiances.

In essence what the Zion diaspora has managed to do is flip the narrative to that of a Jewish Holocaust as coined in a Hollywood account sometime in the 1970’s.

Antisemitism is aligned with Nazism.   Yet we have three quite prominent Jewish dynasties which collaborated with the Nazis during WWII.  Explaining how and why Nazi scientists survived and were spirited into the US, Canada, Argentina, and Switzerland.

Despite the label, Switzerland has been mired in  ‘election fraud’ allegations in 2019, 2021, and 2022.   Thereby taking a hit on its Election Freedom index…

According to USAID, Democracy is defined as:  A system of governance wherein power is vested in The People via Democratic governance and human rights are critical components of sustainable development and lasting peace.

In the US, human rights have been abolished.  Peace has existed for 17 out of the last 250 years.  Given that elections have always been a proxy of the UK and Zion establishment, governance is vested in war hawks. And ‘sustainable development’ is a creation of the Klaus Schwab Zion Protocols advocating for mass depopulation in order to sustain earth for the Chosen Ones.

In other words, democracy today does not exist and plausibly has never existed.   But the term has been used as a means of mass hypnosis to demonize anyone who does not Follow The Master Craft of the Cartel – Rothschild.  Of course, a global coup is rather difficult when only 10 out of 196 nations or just 5% of the governments have been colonized into the cult – yet their EverReady battery is still operational – albeit on its last watt of life as we round the corner and start looking at what it will take to undo what has been done.

Personally, such an unraveling would require a host of revisions that begins at the top and works its way down.  Otherwise, we are simply spinning and the Fourth Reich will rise in the future….

reimagined as The Chosen Ones.

No-Deal BREXIT: The COST

Posted on by Helena

Brussels claims the UK will need to cough up $47.7 billion in a hard BREXIT. PM Johnson claims the number is closer to $8 billion. Who is right?

When Theresa May was PM, she supposedly offered $40 billion to the EU Commission and that was rejected.   Obviously, the art of the deal was to never have a deal. And May was a part of that treason. While the EU continues to use this number as an agreed dollar figure, given there was ‘no agreement’, that number disappears from any future negotiations.  As in – poof.

In other words, the EU Commission may have royally screwed themselves in not making any partial or piecemeal form of agreement within the Theresa May treason. That could have obligated the UK to some form of payment.   But a ‘no deal’ means exactly that, nothing was resolved.   A legal misstep.

And in that, Boris Johnson is correct, the only potential obligation would be the UK’s annual membership fee through 2020.

Most recently, the EU has insinuated that a nonpayment scheme would result in instituting a trade war to punish the UK.   Roughly 35% of UK exports find their way to EU countries. But more significantly, 45% of UK imports come from the EU bloc.   With the economy of Germany tanking, a trade war with the UK would all but collapse the EU. Still, the EU is adamant, “UK will have to pay no deal BREXIT”.

But the UK isn’t arguing that, the argument is how and how much?

The problem? The legal position is unclear, allowing for vast differences of ‘opinion’ as to how and how much.

While May invoked Article 50 in 2016 giving a two year window for negotiations, there is no mandate in that Article for financial reparations.   Article 210(3) discusses the exact template of divorce, but also provides no insight into a financial obligations.   However, some legal opinion states that the UK is subject to trade agreements made by the EU in 2014, which are valid for seven years, placing the UK liable for their unused share – November 1, 2019 thru December 31, 2020, which would amount to 16%.

It is then up to the EU Commission to provide substantive analysis of each and every trade agreement created in 2014 for which the UK would be held responsible, and the amount that remains unpaid in such negotiations.   But that is rather simplistic when one considers the co-mingling of assets – as in a marital divorce.   Those assets far exceed any dollar figure the EU can legally assert against the UK, and will require extensive research and market analysis.

In 2017, the UK’s net contribution to the EU was roughly $9 billion.  If the EU wants to have access to the single market system like Switzerland, it is estimated to cost $3.71 billion per year.   It is based on a flat rate of .2% of GDP.   But someone hasn’t done their math!   In 2017, Switzerland’s GDP was roughly $679 billion. If their contribution rate is .2% – their contribution would only be $1.35billion.

In 2017, the UK GDP was $2.62 trillion. If we impose the same deal as Switzerland, the incorporated trade deal would cost the UK, $5.2 billion per year or about half its current contribution with all the luxuries that are afforded other non-EU members including Switzerland.

In that light, the UK would have no obligation to commit to the Socialist rules and agendas imposed by the EU, would not be propping up faltering economies, and would enjoy the freedom of single market trade.

But during the massive treason exploited by Theresa May, the GDP growth rate for the UK tanked falling recently to negative territory triggered by manufacturing.     France and Germany have also experienced a sharp decline in the GDP since the beginning of 2018.   (Interestingly, Russia’s GDP growth rate has far surpassed that of the EU member states – but the media is silent…).

Forecasts for France and Germany, the EU powerhouses, are glum with high unemployment, low growth, a rising trade imbalance, and high personal and corporate tax rates. They have lost their ‘mojo’.

The EU Commission no longer holds the aces in a poker hand, and PM Johnson and President Trump are all too aware of that truth.

A no-deal BREXIT may have a sluggish start, but given assistance from the US in trade, it would be absolutely disastrous for EU partners to lose the UK as a trade account.   Germany’s economy would tank, France’s would follow, while other lesser trade countries might take advantage of a lucrative deal; Hong Kong, Italy, China, Japan, South Korea, Turkey and UAE, to name a few.

If Germany and France go – so shall the entire EU, as in – poof…