Hawking – Water – and Over Population

Stephen Hawking has issued another dire warning stating that world population will outpace resources within 100 years and apocalyptic trends are highly probable.

It isn’t the first time he has issued such catastrophic warnings. But his solution of moon settlement seems rather odd, to say the least. First the moon has no usable resources. Second the moon is highly fragile and upsetting its balance could actually ‘cause’ the earth to enter a cataclysmic stage.  And third, how many people could it support? The answer is none. Fleeing earth that has resources to settle on the moon that has NO resources seems rather ill-advised.

The other alternative being juggled by NASA and the science community is to colonize Mars. This too seems rather inane given that all scientific data theorize that while Mars ‘may have’ had water resources at one time, due to it’s death, those resources can not be harvested. So again, why would we leave an abundant planet for a death planet?

One of the greatest fears is earth’s population explosion. Over the last couple hundred years, Europe’s population has declined, the US has risen minimally, even Africa’s population growth rate is a graphic low. The abundance comes from one source – China. For thousands of years China’s population remained stagnant. Then in 1750 it took a sharp tick upward and by 2017 had risen from 140 million to 1.5 billion, representing 20% of the entire world population.

India’s population is a close second with 1.3 billion, and Africa clambering behind at 1.186 billion. As a region, Asia accounts for 60% of the world population.

Why is this important? Because altering demographics in Europe and North America are going to have little to no effect on the overall crisis of the earth having too many people to sustain.

China’s one child policy was introduced in 1979 when the population was 977.8 million. So despite a one child policy, China’s total population grew 54% matching the total growth rate of India!     Not exactly a success story.  During the same period the US growth was 43%. While China and India can’t boast immigration as a factor in their growth, Europe and the US can, so their rates are a bit skewed and most likely quite lower in actuality.

There are only two means of reducing growth – via birth or via death…

And there is only one way to mitigate lacking resources – attach someone elses.

The most important resource is water.

And while scientists are trying to determine how they can harvest water on the moon, earthlings continue to fail to capture the water already generated here! Wouldn’t it make more sense to preserve?   California is the most mundane example of a state whose usage of water is massive, and yet every seven years whines about drought conditions when they haven’t built a reservoir to capture the rainfall when it is abundant!    Instead it is left to drain into the ocean, unused, wasted.   These same Californians would have us spend trillions $$$$ to extract a couple gallons from the Moon…

Just to prove it exists.

Half of California’s water resources go to watering grass, 14% is lost due to leaky pipes, and 27% is used for toilets… The average water use per family in the US is roughly 552 gallons per day.  However, the largest user of our water resources is through thermoelectric power which consumes roughly 41.5% of all usage.

In other words, all those conservation electric power plants consume 41.5% of our water resources. The states with the largest water draws for thermoelectric power include California, Texas, New York and Michigan. Once again, the circle takes us back to California where consumption of our most valuable resource is the highest, and preservation is the lowest.

Preservation and solutions seem a better way to resolve our earthly problems rather than leaving a dead planet in order to colonize another dead planet… Of course, transporting 7 billion people to the moon isn’t exactly feasible either. It took thirty years to build the Space Shuttle and it can hold 7 people.

PLAN B!

Hawking?  Anyone?  Anyone?

Paris Climate Agreement: SHAMEFUL SHAM

Does anyone know exactly what the Paris Climate Agreement says? Because, if you are like me – the answer is “No”.

So, I decided to read/skim through the Agreement in order to see what all the fuss is about:

  1. It utilizes words like ‘aim’ and ‘goal’ quite a bit to define its terms.
  2. It seems to address catastrophic events quite a bit, which would be more like a universal FEMA.
  3. As with all good intentions, so far, the US is one of only a spattering of countries that has actually anted any money via cash and/or commitment, amounting to about 1/3 of the total so far.
  4. In fact, France, US and Japan are the ONLY developed countries that have put their money where their mouth is.
  5. As with all such contracts, the UN, in all their bloated transparency, would be the ‘accountant’ and ‘distributor’ of funds.
  6. Every nation’s aim or goal is not subject to any legal requirement at all, the only legal requirement is that each country report their progress.
  7. The ‘emission cut targets for 2016’ were 3’, verses the 2’ required by the Agreement, so right off the assembly line, it reports a failure rate of 50%.
  8. Bottom line – everything is ‘voluntary’ – no incentive, no consequence.
  9. Everybody ‘should’ cooperate, everybody ‘should ‘share’, everybody ‘should’ be transparent…and nice.   Sounds like a Kindergarten lesson plan.
  10. And this one is scary! “The Conference of the Parties, the supreme body of the Convention, shall serve as the meeting of the Parties to this Agreement.”

“Supreme Body”, sounds like a Communist takeover.

Aims and goals can be funny things from a purely business standpoint. Imagine the Saudi’s wrote a contract with Boeing to provide $5 billion in aerospace and military equipment. They would aim to pay at the time of delivery. They take delivery and decide their aim was not realistic and so they defer payment for another 25 years…

That’s what an aim looks like in the business world, and that’s why this Paris Agreement is worthless.

In addition, there are three parties that have not signed, 2 of which the media notates regularly, Syria and Iraq. The third is The Holy See.

Of the 195 countries signing the Agreement, 20 are responsible for a greater than 1% contribution to the global emissions with China, the EU and the US representing about 48%.  That means, that the combined largest polluters are going to raise more than $100 billion annually to fund a bunch of UN jobs to oversee the money and distribute it to countries that have little to no effect on global emissions.  What the HEY?

That is our UN hard at work!

The Agreement further denotes ‘Capacity Building’. Meaning the UN and developed countries will ‘enhance’ developing countries to take action to change the effects of climate change on their ‘Party country’.

Sounds like a global initiative to come in the backdoor and take control of a country, telling them what to do, how, where and why, when the country isn’t even contributing to climate change in the first place…

Fishy is as Fishy does.

Appears more likely that the Paris Agreement is a detractor cover for a global seizure of small countries so as to incorporate them into the larger country – the UN because it has nothing to do with ‘climate’ and everything to do with building out these smaller countries so that they can be mined and owned.   Like the African Land Grabs – only on a global scale.

The God Particle – CERN’s Black Hole

The God Particle – Black Holes – Climate Destabilization – Exploding Atoms – Imbalances In Gravity Functions – And The Potential To Suck The Universe into a Hole of Chaos

= CERN

The CERN project; a twenty mile long collider functioning outside Geneva which purportedly manipulates particles in collision force so as to create mini black holes and search for a way to manipulate time. Once time has been mastered, the doors will open to alternate universes – and alternate dimensions. While CERN has been operational for two decades, little is known, transparency is once again redacted, and the scope of the consequential reactions to our planet, climate and universe are quashed. We are not allowed to know. Because if we did – there is no way we would be silent.

Enter Stephen Hawking, perhaps the most celebrated intellect of our time, citing dire warnings that the collider must be shut down immediately, and no one listens… shhhh.

The God Particle, or Higgs Boson, is a particle that breaks the current scientific laws of mass and one that has no spin, colour change or electric charge – but is considered quite unstable as it is decaying. In laymen’s terms it is the theory that was used in the Star Trek television show that allowed the transporter to scramble a person’s mass and re-organize that mass someplace else. It is also thought to contain the answer to the creation of life. It is the scientific version of faith. While it is actually still a theory, yet unproven, manipulating particles and protons have the potential for catastrophic consequences – destablizing the delicate balance of our universe so as to literally create the possibility of it being sucked inside a black hole.

In the meantime, these experiments are said to wreak havoc with our ‘climate’, and our natural energy and gravitational fields as massive collisions of particles/protons are experimented with to test the efficacy of physical laws, the effect of which produces dark matter. There are some who believe that major natural disasters occur as a result of these collision projects: April 23 to June 26, 2016, June 3 to November 25, 2015, April 5 to May 20, 2015, January 20 to February 11, 2013, April 5 2012, to November 8, 2012 – etc… all testing periods that coincided with massive weather disruptions.

April to June, 2016; massive flooding in West Virginia, and catastrophic wildfires in California, earthquake in Krgyzstan, cyclones in the Arabian Sea, intense thunderstorm in Croatia, volcano in Ecquador, tornado in eastern China, intense heat wave in US, severe thunderstorms in India, record rainfall in Japan… the list goes on and each brought loss of lives.

Again… Stephen Hawking believes the collider is creating unstable physical changes and needs to be shut down immediately.

A Black Hole. A region of space in which energy is so intense that no matter and no light may escape. Steven Hawking believes that the matter absorbed by a black hole does not evaporate according to classical thought, but is garbled and spit back out, albeit in a chaotic matter. What this means to the laymen would be that a mass, a human form that was transposed (like in Star Trek) would come out on the other side completely re-created and most likely in a form that would not support life.

But the greed for knowledge is so perverse, scientists don’t really care, they simply wish to prove the possibility, even in a theoretical manner, with risk being an infinite formula. Risk is worth the potential – even to the loss of a universe – ours.

Was the God Particle even found? According to Stephen Hawking – no. What the press and media print are ‘theoretical’ discoveries, yet unproven, yet discernible, yet defined, yet known of risk potential and doomsday consequence. Because a great deal of science is just that – theorems based on theorems. And if the underlying theorem that stands as the core block upon which further theorems are stacked – the end result depends on each successive theorem having fact. It is similar to dating techniques whereby the surrounding area in which something has been discovered is used as the core point for dating a bone. In reality this eliminates the idea that the bone was placed there, moved there, or swept there in a flood. Static theory.

And while the conspiracy theorists have been having a particle day with the CERN project, it is hard not to listen to Stephen Hawking’s warnings. Credence abounds. Opening a portal, without knowing what is on the other side is something like Pandora’s Box, what we let in is more important than what we are sending – out.

What Stephen Hawking is warning us about is – the unknown. Attempting to recreate the Big Bang Theory without knowing the consequences is like playing with fire. These scientists have the capability of unleashing a jolt, that could spin our little planet inches off it’s axis and plummet us into the abyss. And while risk is necessary in order to advance, there are times when the risk out weighs the benefit – in the real world – but apparently, not in science.

Dedicated to: Mr. and Mrs. Smith of Georgia.