The Global World Order: Communism, Polar Vortex, Africa and CERN’s Blackholes

George Soros has warned that unless the left wing EU Liberals wake up quickly, the EU will fall into oblivion just like the Soviet Union…  

Interesting observation. Why?  Because it illuminates the fact that Soros once supported the Soviet Union – when it was ruled by Communism before it fell into oblivion and became Russia.  Thus, in effect he is warning that unless the EU jolts itself back to its communist roots, it will fall into the same evil capitalism that grounds Russia today.  While chastising Germany’s coalition for not being more aggressive in their pro-EU stance, he goes on to blame the EU for unfairly asserting that immigrants must remain in the country where they first enter the EU and putting too much pressure on Italy, all the while praising the Green Party.  This ‘pressure’, he feels is what ultimately created the rise of Italian populism.

Of course, all these policies were initiated by Soros.  Thus he is attempting to redirect blame and justify his failure.

Soros is 88 years old. Dementia is likely a product of his odd attempts at deflection.  But he has 1 daughter and four sons, and two of the sons and the daughter are worth researching;  Jonathon, Alexander and Andrea.

Working somewhat behind the scenes, and rarely discussed, is Soros only daughter, Andrea Soros.  On the Board of Acumen, they invest in enterprises working in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Latin America.  The same ‘hot climates’ that the Paris Accord attempts to redirect climate change funds.   Supported by the Rockerfeller Foundation, Chase Bank, Bill Gates, DOW Chemical and the Clinton Foundation, Acumen is basically a microfinance organization, a credit nightmare for poor people.

Alexander is just 33, on the Board of Open Society Foundation, Jewish Funds For Justice, and Global Witness.

Jewish Funds For Justice merged with Progressive Jewish Alliance whose CEO is Simon Greer.  His father, Colin Greer runs the New World Foundation.  A liberal foundation founded by Anita McCormick.  Hillary Clinton was on the Board from 1982 to 1988 during which time the foundation gave money to “New Left” causes including;    the Christic Institute, Grassroots International, Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador (CISPES), FAIR, and the National Lawyers Guild.   By the early 1990s, the foundation was giving money to Silicon Valley.

Ms. McCormick launched a New York newspaper called the National Guardian, which simply became The Guardian.  The Guardian was pro-Soviet Union Communism and pro-Maoist Communism.   The roots of Communism run deep in the Cabal.

The Christic Institute, founded by Daniel Sheehan, morphed into the Romero Institute after it lost its non-profit status for filing a frivolous lawsuit.    CISPES came under FBI investigation for its alleged ties to rebel factions that supported Marxism-Leninism and the US Communist Party.

Jonathon Soros, the eldest son was responsible for significant losses in the Soros Fund and stepped down as Chief Investment Officer in 2011 to start his own fund which manages a relatively small amount – $500 million. His Soros projects include supporting the elimination of the electoral college, and the creation of a super PAC to end super Pacs.   He is aligned with a number of Daddy’s pets including:  Democracy Alliance, Move On, Media Matters New America Foundation and the Roosevelt Institute, whose Board is comprised of a who’s who of teamsters supporting government expansion and higher taxation.

Google’s Chief Executive Officer serves on the Board of New America.   The Current president of New America, Anne-Marie Slaughter served as Director of Policy Planning in Hillary’s State Department tenure. Slaughter still consults for the State Department and sits on the Board of the US Foreign Policy Advisory, an agency created by Hillary Clinton.  The current Board reads like a who’s who of Germans, Obama, Clinton and Bush caricatures. It also includes the American Security Project, an organization that focuses on climate change and ‘fusion energy’.  In particular, CERN, the Large Haldron Collider which was charged with creating microscopic black holes for the purpose of finding alternate dimensions.    Why? Perhaps to escape the fast decaying dimension we are living in right now.  But there are concerns that the smashing of particles is actually accelerating a global decay causing massive shifts in the earths crust, fissures, tectonic collapses, and altering the weather.   Steven Hawking famously quoted:

The Higgs potential has the worrisome feature that it might become metastable at energies above 100 [billion] gigaelectronvolts (GeV). This could mean that the universe could undergo catastrophic vacuum decay, with a bubble of the true vacuum expanding at the speed of light. This could happen at any time and we wouldn’t see it coming.”

Inline with the Climate Change theory, in 2018 it was announced that Bill Gates was funding an experiment whereby particles would be sprayed in the sky to dim the sun so as to create a cooling effect.  SCoPEx was approved by the UN Intergovernmental Pattern on Climate Change in conjunction with Harvard scientists.  In January 2019, the US experienced a massive Polar Vortex that plunged temperatures into record regions of -60’.   The Media claim the Polar Vortex was caused by ‘Global Warming’.

Obviously Harvard and the UN fast tracked their particle release without government approval.   Obviously, these scientists are operating outside of People Approval.  Obviously, corporate power is controlling our sustainability, our weather, and our future.  And with our planet looking fragile under their tutelage, fast tracking Communism would give them the depopulation necessary for their survival.  And in the end, if they accomplish their directive to plunge the world into a polar freeze, where best to retire – AFRICA.

 

Climate Change: The Magnetic North is Shifting

The media is busily denigrating the US for our heinous lack of adherence to lower emissions and meet the ‘goals’ of the Paris Climate Accord.   Forbes refers to us as “The Ugly Face of America”.   While citing percentages with self grandizing authority and blaming Trump for pulling out of “Obama’s Clean Power Plan”, Forbes does not articulate the fact that Obama’s plan did – nothing.   The US remained second highest producer of CO2 emissions behind China throughout Obama’s administration rule.   Obama did make a ‘call’ for more renewable, and he did make a ‘commitment’, but those are words – just as the entire Paris Accord is a body of goals and words without any rule.

Germany’s largest power station is fueled by coal, as is Denmark’s, Australia, Chile, India, Serbia, Poland, etc…  The largest power station in the US is Hydroelectric.   The 20 largest power producing facilities in the world are Hydro and nuclear with the exception of two, one in China and one in Japan.   And despite Forbes using Germany as an example to model, they failed each and every standardized goal set by Merkel who has now pushed that agenda to a possible – 2030.

Politicians routinely spew a plethora of rhetorical word-plays which the media regurgitates as fact when they are simply legalistic word-plays.   Throw in a few get out of jail free cards like ‘our aim’, ‘our path’, ‘our goal’, and when those ideals are not met – ‘we never promised’ is the free card.

But Germany isn’t the only country to backslide on their commitments, China, the world’s largest polluter, has pushed the punchcard to 2030 as well.    But even if those 2′ goals are attained, according to the UN the ‘goals’ are not even remotely effective and collectively all countries would have to increase their goals five fold to effect the necessary 1.5’ commitment.

In other words, even if every country collectively meets the Paris Accord goal of 2’ by 2030, they will still fall short of the necessary goal by 25%. And it is a fair guess that by then the entire Accord will have fizzled into nothing given no one has the funds to ante up – especially if the EU ends up footing the bill for the UN and their own military defense and their burgeoning immigration welfare.

In the Trump Blame Game, what exactly did Trump change with respect to Obama’s Climate Control policy?

1)   He hired an EPA Minister that the left doesn’t like, who subsequently resigned after threats.

2)   He lifted ‘some restrictions’ on greenhouse emissions from coal plants.

3)   Eased restrictions on millions of acres of land that had been protected for the “Grouse”.

4)   Approved five oil and gas companies permission to use seismic airgun blasts to search for oil and gas in the ocean.

5)   Lifted the block for the Keystone XL Pipeline.

6)   Sent to the appeals court a request to quash the Youth Climate Lawsuit – that no one knows diddly about.

7)   Cleared production of oil and gas wells in the Arctic.

8)   Signed a bill to clean up the plastic pollution in our oceans.

9)   Disbanded an ‘Air Pollution Review Panel’.

10) Extended the ban on mining near Yellowstone.

11) Rolled back Obama rules that oil and gas companies must monitor and mitigate the release of methane gas.

The ‘science’ of climate change is actually theory based.    However, in the midst of this climate theory, there is something radically occurring within the earth’s core.   The Magnetic North Field is moving at a speed 4-5 times normal.   “Magnetic fields are essential for life on Earth. That is because the magnetic field protects the planet from cosmic rays and charged particles from solar flares.  If we didn’t have the magnetic field protecting the Earth, then the atmosphere would become stripped of its atoms and the radiation from the solar wind would irradiate all life on Earth.”

The earths magnetic field protects life on earth by shielding it from radiation and moderating our climate.   Over the last 200 years, the magnetic field has weakened by about 15%.   Pole reversals occur naturally with the magnetic field ‘shifting’.   This core shift can be gradual or rapid and defines our shifting climate and radiation.   Some scientists believe these ‘historical shifts’ have been the causal factor in the eradication of Neanderthals and possibly the dinosaurs, etc…

Scientists explain that these shifts create ozone holes and cause charged particles to bombard Earth’s atmosphere during solar storms which would punch holes in Earth’s atmosphere.   It is believed in scientific circles that this weakening would directly effect those species that rely on geomagnetism for navigation, including bees, salmon, turtles, whales, bacteria and pigeons.

This shift has been tracked for about 160 years, the same timeline used to define ‘climate change’.

Currently the shift is occurring at the rate of 40 to 55 km per year.   In 1900 the pole was located in Canada, today it is closing in on Siberia.  So what comes first, the chicken or the egg?   Given that science states that this magnetic shift occurs every 200,000 years, and humans were hardly creating CO2 emissions back in the day, I think it is safe to say in this instance the chicken, the core, is the initiator, and humanities outcome will be the egg.

That said, no amount of Paris Accord ‘goals’ will have one rat’s arse on the outcome.

Good vs. Evil: An Imbalance.

Our Universe is created within the absolutes of good and evil.  One can not exist without the other, just as light only exists because there is darkness.  Our small world is subject to these universal laws.  Our genetic makeup predisposes us to certain diseases, such as cancer and Alzheimers, it also predicates down syndrome and intellect.   Christians believe that every human’s DNA consists of the knowledge of God.  It is also accepted that every individual is born with good and evil DNA.   Two questions:   Could a genetic mutation cause a persons’ good and evil balance to be askew?   Could that skew be ‘genetically modified’?

Society.

Thousands of years and every society known to man has created a concept of good and evil representative according to their unique vision.  Mythology, Paganism they always depict good vs evil in some form. Christianity has God vs Satan. The American Indians had Ioskeha and Tawiscara as their good and evil symbolism.  The forces of these two opponents that battle for eternity can shift wherein an imbalance occurs and Discordia reigns.

Everything on this natural God-made earth was intricately created in a perfect pattern.  In the rain forest it is most evident.  Every creature, every flora, have a purpose. Disrupt that purpose, extract a single subject matter of the natural flow and the entire rain forest system begins to implode devolving into chaos.

GMO’s have are their advocates and their naysayers.  Many things on our planet have undergone genetic modification for a century from genetically modified flowers so that we can have flowers in abundance, to genetically modified fruits so we can grow them year round, to fish farms, dairy cow hormones, etc…   But despite the efforts of science, no human life can be created from ‘scratch’, not even a seed, which is why we have seed banks.

GMO flowers have no scent, GMO fruits lack the same vitamins and minerals, and farm fish have no color, it has to be injected into them.   The GMO Yellow Rice was a complete horror as it had little nutrient value.  But that hasn’t deterred science.  They have manipulated weather patterns having no idea what the negative ramifications will be, they have injected us with vaccines without any testing as to the entire cocktail effect, and they now want to inject particles into the atmosphere to black the sun so as to slow global warming.

Back to good and evil.

Every one of us has witnessed people whose balance of evil seems chaotic.  Is the imbalance a choice?  Does a person have the free will to choose?  Or is the discord a genetic mutation that can be modified… like a flower, like fruit?   And will doing so potentially remove a person’s soul, like the loss of scent or nutrients?

On the other side of the coin, many of us have personally witnessed people whose balance of good seems phenomenally out of proportion.  There are incredibly amazing heroes in our midst that we rarely recognize. Military soldiers.  They make ‘a choice’ within free will to eject themselves into chaos and risk death and torture.  They suffer fallout that we now call PTSD.   This doesn’t mean ‘the military’ I refer to individuals.

They are a sort of super human in that their balance of good far outweighs their balance of evil.

Enter Science.

Science more often than not does not recognize consequences.   Science will do nearly anything in order to change the natural course, in order to genetically modify everything God created.   Including humans.

If science experimented with humans – modifying their genetics so as to create a human more good or more evil, what would be the consequence?

Science is infinitely arrogant. Manipulating a person’s natural genetics without knowing the extent of the consequences, that person would no longer have free will to choose, nor would that person be able to refer back to their original self.  They would in essence become a GMO, a genetically modified organism.  But we know that science has been feverishly working for decades to implant AI in humans, to bionically alter humans, to create a super human – without understanding that such alterations may also result in that human losing their soul.

Evil in this world has shifted to an imbalance.  It is out of concordance.  It is not natural.  To think that ‘choosing’ evil over good is the only cause seems somewhat short sighted. When our heroes are diluted and evil men and women are praised, certainly the powers of evil have risen beyond their natural evolutionary boundaries and there is something more involved than simply ‘choice’.  And science, transhumanism, AI, super humans, genetically modified humans seems more and more a possibility.

Climate Change – Hurricane Madness

Remember the Paris Accord, the Green Climate Fund that was touted as the savior of the world – with the help of $100 billion annually?  Remember that fund that Germany and France and the EU described as all important to sustainability?  Remember how Trump was demonized when he pulled the US out of the agreement and the world chastised and ridiculed him?

Apparently, not even Germany gives a hoot any longer.

Why?  They can’t even begin to come close to meeting emission targets as presumed and simply have given up – the task is daunting, the funds ridiculously outside of reality, and the efforts lame.

According to the latest report by the OECD and NCE, they claim that ‘infrastructure spending needs to exceed $7 trillion per year through 2030’ in order to combat climate change.

Since it’s inception, the Paris Accord Green Climate Fund has raised a total of $10.3 billion in pledges – 20% of which came from the US under Obama.  The EU is not a contributor, Russia and China did not pledge anything, and some of the pledges are actually merely ‘loans’, not full cash gifts.  Based on the $7 trillion required per year since 2016, they are shy $21,989,700,000,000.

The Board at Green Climate has allocated 58% of its funds to Asia and Africa  through intermediaries.  These intermediaries are supposed to dole out the money toward specific goals and objectives. So who are the intermediaries?   World Food Program, The World Bank, United Nations Development Program, UN Food Program, Inter-American Development Bank, etc…

None of the allocated funds are utilized for actual climate change, they are simply redistributed to banks and organizations who have no requirement to delineate transparent use of funds.  In fact it appears that the UN and banks receive the far majority of funds and then disburse the funds as a loan to the project country with ‘commercial rates of interest’.  A win-win for Banks and a slush fund for the UN.

While infrastructure spending can help mitigate natural disasters, like sea-walls for hurricane flooding crisis’, the Green Fund projects seem more aligned to boost agriculture and energy projects – both of which help the underlying shift in land ownership in Africa which is concentrated in higher income locals with ties to the government, China, Middle East, Netherlands, UK and US.  Latin America is no different.  And in reality – has absolutely nothing to do with climate change.

The World Bank recently proposed instituting an annual land tax in Africa which they claim would be utilized to help the locals who are continually displaced due to the Land Grabs. Full Disclosure:  World Bank has been involved in the Land Grabs…

Does this mean that Climate Change is a farse?  No.  It means the Paris Accord was a sham, a Ponzi scheme to reroute funds to support land grab biofuel production while displacing hundreds of thousands of African people.

It means that banks are receiving the money, have absolutely no over-sight, and lend the money that was a gift while charging heavy interest fees that they pocket.

Germany’s carbon footprint has increased over the last few years, China’s is exploding, France and the Netherlands are tackling the problem by stating they will attempt to phase out diesel and petrol by 2040 and 2025 respectively.   Really?   Emissions per capita rank;  Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Australia, US, Saudi Arabia and Canada as the highest.   Only a spattering of Africa countries even make the list…  Hence the new definition of Climate Change – Infrastructure.

Since the US pullout, most other countries have tabled caring, because it was never about caring, it was about lining banks pockets and free infrastructure in those areas of Africa where the land grabs required better access and more water.

And despite the massive number of hurricanes and cyclones pounding countries and wreaking havoc, no one mentions building sea-walls, canals, moats, gullies, etc… to mitigate damage control.

Weather manipulation has reached far greater capacities than we can imagine.   From radio frequency manipulation, to stratosphere solar deflection, to carbon capture, to cloud brightening techniques, climate geoengineering is very real and very destructive.

Harvard is apparently at the forefront of solar geo-engineering, partially funded by Bill Gates, Pritzker Foundation, The Open Philanthropy Project, and the Arnolds, the same Harvard that has accepted funding for such projects as Evolutionary Dynamics (infectious disease evolutions) for which Jeffrey Epstein was supportive.

Basically, it all evolves around the concept of the Greater Good, wherein only the select shall survive in the utilitarian view of the greater good central to hedonistic self pleasure and profit.

As in:  If we, the banks, can’t have WWIII, then we, the Cabal, will create profit from other destructive means.

UNESCO: US Land Grabs!

A recent article purported to show a scathing fact about Liberal Harvard University’s disastrous environmental land grab record that would surely align them with the likes of Hillarygate, Sorosgate, Rothschildgate in their quest to own the vast majority of world resources through Land Grabs. 

But there is another more deadly culprit, an organization that has been systemically doing exactly the same thing all within the guidance and legalize ushered in through Clinton and Obama – UNESCO. The UN!

Oddly, UNESCO, which stands for “United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization” has extended their rule of law by deciding which land across the globe they believe should be sequestered as a “World Heritage Site”.  Who gave them the authority?   They gave it to themselves.

In fact, within the guides of their original NGO creation, they sought to eradicate illiteracy.   Somehow, they extended their hand and have submerged themselves in arena’s quite different…

Apparently, the UN, under the guise of UNESCO, has been busily confiscating large swathes of land and historical sites across the globe for the all encompassing reason – environmental sustainability.  In this grab, control over valuable land in Sudan, South Africa, Ukraine, Russia, Syria, and other areas that provide abundant resources, in particular, “Water” are of high importance to them.  Designating themselves as a World governance, they have amassed control over The lifeblood of all existence – Water.   As such they can determine who gets the water –A power grab like none other!

UNESCO has the power to determine US measures, costs, bills and budgets for such things as these Land Grabs.   They can source the best land.   They can provide the most complete agenda for meeting the ‘needs’ of the opposing government.  And in the end, these Executive Board officials that reign from Europe, the Middle East, Africa and South America can determine what land in the US should be deemed ‘protected’ and assert themselves as the global protector of such places as Monticello, Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, and even the Statue of Liberty.

The last time the US sat on the Board was 2012-2015.   So we effectively have absolutely no say whatsoever in the decision of what sites, land, and water within the US will now come under the control and auspices of UNESCO.  NONE. 

UNESCO Director-General is Audrey Azoulay, a Moroccan Jew who supports Palestine and Socialism.  In other words – a Communist who has visions of grandeur.

In the 1970’s and 1980’s the New World Information and Communication Order was created under UNESCO as established by the McBride Commission.  The purpose was to create a “One World Voice” to make the media more ‘equitable and balanced’.  All information would be contained in one media opinion.  In response, the US and UK dropped out of UNESCO.  In 2003, the US rejoined.

UNESCO has also ingratiated itself in the Israeli conflict, routinely condemning Israel in favor of Palestine.   In 2010, UNESCO claimed that their interference in the designation of Holy sites by Israel was within their jurisdiction given their mission is to support scientific and cultural cooperation throughout the world.  Who gave them such governance?  They gave it to themselves.

They are self promoting. They are an NGO.  They are not a governance.  Yet they hold themselves out as such and use that voice to institute world decisions – NOT voted on by The People.

UNESCO has hailed Che Guevara as a hero.  Insulted Japan in calling for the Nanjing Massacre to be part of their Memory of the World Register.  Their achievements are difficult to assess given that they have extended themselves far beyond their Protocol of governance, and because, like the UN, most of their ‘record’ involves phrases like;  ‘we held a convention…’, or ‘we helped train…’ or ‘we assisted in the decision making process…’ – all vague nondescript self laudings that could mean absolutely nothing.  Of course it goes without saying that the UN has one of the most generous compensation packages that may include a pension, housing, meals, a car, and basically everything a family would need in order to never actually spend a dime.  So keeping the funds flowing is essential to their lucrative power.

As such, Trump has announced that the US will no longer fund UNESCO and once again we will be redistributing those monies to US causes, US people, and US companies.   The US pays 22% of their annual budget.

FAKE Science – Crisis in Reproducing Conclusions

A Private Foundation that is funding Liberal agenda’s has one such agenda that bears definition:  reproducibility in science.

The Laura and John Arnold Foundation funds research into the reproducibility in sciencewhich is:  “a methodological crisis in science in which scholars have found that the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to replicate or reproduce on subsequent investigation, either by independent researchers or by the original researchers themselves.”

This failure to uphold scientific research and conclusions is apparently massive:

Chemistry – 87%

Biology – 77%

Physics and Engineering – 66%

Earth Sciences – 64%

In medicine 67% of medical researchers admitted to knowing someone who falsified their research.

Forget Fake News, Fake Science is far more pervasive and the consequences more staggering.   This means that the vast majority of all scientific fact cannot be verified as fact at all.  It means that science has evolved into a crystal ball magnitude of false conclusions effecting every aspect of society from basic medicine to sports and exercise, to diet, to psychology and even globalization.  The argument basis doesn’t EXIST.

This further denounces the cause for government sponsored University R&D on behalf of the pharma industry funded by taxpayer dollars!  The fake news is that the research is positive – the real news is the research conclusions may be faked.

Initially the conclusions were founded in psychology research.  Scientists from all over the world were asked to replicate the findings of a psychological conclusion that had been reported in a journal.   Within social studies, the ability to replicate the supposed published results was as low as 23%.  It is believed that authors were biased, careless, sometimes outright fraudulent, and of the belief that their conclusions would simply never be challenged. It was a tick mark for publication.

But this falsification of evidence expanded exponentially into all areas of science. It is believed that the perversity of reward created a decayed research for individual gratification instead of fact.

Today scientists are trying to backtrack on the problem by claiming it is not a crisis but more of a boo-boo.  Afraid of the backlash, they are attempting to redefine ‘replication’.  In addition, the number of studies that are failing in even small batches is highly significant.  One scientist attempted to dissuade the failure rate by stating that not all aspects of a conclusion need to be replicated, and that even if a small percentage can be assured, then the study should be considered in good standing and positive.

But I’m not willing to be only 23% cured… I’m not willing to spend 100% for a 23% conclusion…  If I buy a gallon of milk I don’t want to receive ¼ of a gallon…

It effects cancer research, vaccine research, psychological evaluations, and even global warming…

If a scientific conclusion cannot be replicated then the conclusion cannot be considered a fact, it can be considered a stated theory.   Scientists try to argue that replication is a personal issue with the replicating scientists, and not the conclusion.  But that might also indicate that the vaccine that is produced and manufactured is based on the conclusion of one study of one individual whose biological makeup is specific and not conventional, therefore individual number two would not respond the same way and the vaccine is ineffective on a mass level.

The entire scientific community argument in itself is filled with false and fraudulent convictions that further displaces the concept of fact. Unfortunately, if we call scientific conclusions as theory, it upends any argument affecting health, climate, disease, and psychology – it puts them out of business because they are now simpleton soothsayers.   It opens the doors to massive lawsuits.   And it turns the entire pharma industry upside down.

The ramifications could be a domino effect of such proportions that we have never seen before.  And they have gone into scramble mode to attempt to justify the faked results, the falsified conclusions, and the disproportionately low success rates.

Ozone Hole is Shrinking? Because…

The Ozone Hole is shrinking – according to Scientific reports released in 2016! In fact, it appears that the main reason it is shrinking is because of the natural global temperature changes, ie, warmer temperatures in the polar regions cause the hole to shrink and rising temperatures in the stratosphere also play a significant role. This would indicate that over thousands of years as the earth’s temperatures rise and cool, holes develop and disappear as a common reaction. According to NASA.

Of course, the MSM would liken the decrease to the Montreal Protocol which called for the decreased use of CFC gases such as those coming from spray bottles…   However, there is absolutely no evidence to support this theory, instead scientists are pointing to the natural occurrences of global weather shifts as the most significant contributing factor.

According to ‘climate predictions’, the hole was slated to return to its 1980’s size sometime between 2050 and 2070.   However, as of 2017 it is already its 1988 size, once again proving that science is at best – a theory.   The Montreal Protocol which was signed in 1987 and initiated in 1989, was only sporadically implemented across the globe, had multiple phase out time frames, and did not include HCFC’s until 2015 when the Ozone Hole had already dwarfed in size.   In addition, not all countries banned the use of CFC’s; China, India and South Korea still proliferate their use.

Du Pont began producing hydrofluorocarbons as an alternative to the phasing out of CFC’s. However, it was later discovered that these HFC’s contribute to Global Warming and they became the target of the Kyoto Protocol which sought to ban their use worldwide  Unfortunately, they had already become mass produced and were a market source around the globe. So, a lean period was initiated in which phase outs were established to be in full force as of 2020 for developed countries and 2030 for developing countries…

But the phaseout hasn’t happened. In fact, the largest producers include; Coca-Cola, DuPont, Honeywell, ThermoKing and Carrier Transicold. Problem? Of course, the alternatives that have been put in service to phaseout the HFC’s are also now considered unsafe… But they haven’t been banned because there really isn’t an alternative that has been created that is considered ‘safe’ although everything is delisted via a Climate Protocol so as to create a phaseout sometime in the future – maybe in 3 or 4 decades… but in the meantime we’ve already discovered that the natural variation in climate is fixing the problem without Scientists involvement.

Gee Whilakers!  Bottom line?

We have replaced the CFC’s that were thought to have ‘caused’ the Ozone Hole with a number of alternate compounds including HFC’s and HCFC’s and R’s and Q’s galore, only to discover that all the alternates are also causing Global Warming and the depletion of the Ozone layer, only to find that everything is super-naturally fixing itself – anyway!

Whew!

I’m sure glad Science fixed all those problems for us!   Cause I sure don’t know w hat we would do otherwise…

 

In the meantime, not to be left out of the loop of god status, the EPA announced in 2015 that they were going to call for a phaseout of all HFC’s as a part of Obama’s Climate Change Plan of Action. I guess they didn’t get the memo that the Ozone Hole was already fixing itself.   In the meantime, a report issued by the UN in 2016 stated that HFC use in ALL countries across the globe is expected to rise significantly over the coming decades averaging about 16% per country.

 

I guess NO ONE got the memo. But hey, the Ozone Hole continues to contract. FYI: the UN has an Ozone branch whose purpose is to study Ozone and to ask pretty please will everyone voluntarily reduce useage…

De Blasio Suing Oil Companies For Climate Change Amidst Budget Deficit

De Blasio is boldly going where no man has gone before – filing a lawsuit against multiple worldwide oil and gas companies for their role in Hurricane Sandy’s devastation, health issues, and infrastructure destruction to his great New York City… Oh, but wait, he isn’t just suing the oil companies, he is targeting NYC pension funds in an effort to ‘divest’ their investment in fossil fuels and divert it to Climate Change issues.   What?

BP, Conoco, Exxon, Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell are the major targets. Proving that they directly impacted climate change and caused harm to NYC specifically, is a rather uphill battle. But apparently one De Blasio and Company feel is possible and just might mitigate his ever defeated budget deficit.

According to the Budget Comptroller for NY, NYC is facing a deficit of as much as $7 billion as of March this year. According to the analysis, NYC could be facing a disaster scenario under the tutelage of De Blasio and he’s running scared with nowhere to turn to find the $$$$$.   In addition, Trump’s new tax plan could cause a massive exodus as taxpayers seek more friendly places to park their money given the limitations on interest deductions will impact their itemized deduction caps.  With some of the highest priced real estate in the country, mortgages are a mainstay. But the rationale was the deductibility of the interest.  No more.

As a result, De Blasio is scrambling and this is the best scenario he could come up with while attempting to capitalize on an issue that is embedded in the Liberal agenda – Climate Change.

De Blasio’s threat to redirect NYC pension fund investments is a bit of a smokescreen given the fund has been in a massive overhaul for the past 3 ½ years when Scott Stringer took office and declared that the retirement system was “hanging by a thread”. At issue was the fact that the returns delivered by the fund were considered inadequate and well below the market.   Implementing a comprehensive plan that Stringer estimated would take 5-10 years to become a powerhouse once again, cannot simply be ‘modified’ to coddle the whims of De Blasio. Fiduciary responsibilities dictate.

Two NGO’s are supporting the De Blasio move, Union of Concerned Scientists, which is the recipient of funding from George Soros, and 350.org, which is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation and has partnered with Global Greengrants Fund, a Soros Open Society promotion. In fact, according to their Form 990, the only grant made by 350.org was to Global Greengrants Fund.

 

Climatic Change, a journal established by Michael Oppenheimer and Gary Yohe, published a study claiming that climate damages such as rising sea levels and increased temperatures are a direct result of products sold by such companies as Chevron and ExxonMobil. In addition, the Union For Concerned Scientists (Soros funded) has joined in the fray of qualifying finger pointing by claiming that:   “We’ve known for a long time that fossil fuels are the largest contributor to climate change. What’s new here is that we’ve determined just how much specific companies’ products have caused the earth to warm and the seas to rise.”

The study suggests that all the major oil companies combined contributed to 10% of the global temperature increase between 1980 and 2010 and 4% of the rise in sea level.   The study specifically provides Hurricane Sandy as an example of rising sea levels magnified by climate change causing roughly $2 billion in damage over what would have occurred had there been no rise in sea levels.  The total estimated cost was $65 billion.  How they can make monetary determinations is a bit stretched…and seems to have no supporting documentation.

So, who commissioned this report?

The lead author of the report was Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate science director at the Union for Concerned Scientists. Coincidentally, Gary Yohe, who assisted in this publication, is also a Member of the NYC Panel on Climate Change. Somewhat a conflict of interest?

Further conflicts include the fact that Michael Oppenheimer also founded, Climate Action Network which is aligned with Soros Fund Management and Christine Lagarde, of France’s Economic Ministry.

So why would Soros want to hit the wallets of oil and gas executives?   Hitting the biggest oil giants, might give a boost to some of the smaller companies, like:  Petroleo Brasilerosa, California Resources, Valvoline, Rice Energy, Targa Resources and Diamondback all of which were owned in Soros portfolio last year.  Of course the hypocrisy doesn’t end there with Soros heavily invested in the Williams Pipeline company, and Columbia Pipeline which merged with Transamerica of the Keystone XL fame…   Creating a profit while belying ethics is the Soros windfall.

Other cities and counties suing the oil giants include California’s Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Oakland and Imperial Beach.   All these cities and counties project a continued significant budget deficit now and in the coming years… and tapping climate change might fill the gap…

By the time any legal action is concluded, Soros will be well out of the oil and gas investments – an easy bet.  Playing both sides, not unlike his play of Republicans and Democrats.  “Anyone, Anyone”…

The Ego of Science: Global Freeze

As the “Bomb Cyclone” envelops the east coast, global warming scientists are rallying round the icicle desperately trying to convince everyone that this is a common evolution of a Global Warming schism. As such their ego’s are frayed and fear for their scholarly name rules their psyche.

To quote Sir Isaac Newton, “For every action there is an equal opposite reaction”. And this can be found in the ego of science today. For every scientist making a conclusion in favor of man-made Global warming, there is an equal force reaction of a scientist denying the account.  Hence – it becomes a theory, as there is no consensus of evidence.

Case in point: Mother Jones, a trendy Liberal media outlet, is quoting Dr. Jennifer Francis, a researcher of arctic climate change, who states that the warming in the Arctic changes the jetstream which causes ‘extreme weather conditions around the globe including floods, extreme cold, extreme heat, droughts, etc… ‘   In other words, every single weather condition known to mankind can be traced back to her specific research field – the Arctic.

Enter Dr. Ed Berry, a physicist who utilizes the ego of scientists to support his conclusion that manmade Global Warming is a farcical idea easily disproven by the insertion of one proven conclusion – CO2 does not drive climate.

“The scientific method says we can never prove an idea is true. We only can prove an idea is false. To approach truth, we discard fiction. Since we can never discard all fiction, science is never settled.”

This rationale is supported by Dr. Murray Salby who has written a textbook on the subject, and Dr. Willie Soon, who has proven that there is no correlation between earth’s temperature and CO2.

Francis’ claim that the jetstream is altered by a warming arctic is an idea, a presentation without evidence or scientific data to uphold the ‘idea’. And yet, this philosophy of thought is held out as scientific proof… when in fact it is one person’s theory. Science does state that the jetstreams are a factor of 1) solar radiation, and 2) earth rotation. Period.

Science has taken leaps and bounds in its self defense. The flu vaccine is mass marketed each year and now includes infants as young as 6 months. What is in the vaccine?   MSG, sugar, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, various antibiotics, sucrose and sorbitol, thimerosol which contains mercury, fertilized chicken eggs, aka egg protein, and the virus itself – YUM!  

As is the case with every vaccine, all of these ingredients are said to be ‘safe and effective’.   Sort-of. With the current flu crisis shooting across the globe, the CDC has issued a precaution because, well, the vaccine is actually only, maybe, possibly, sort-of 10% effective. And yet they encourage everyone to ante up and pay the price.

As to the scientists who diligently create the concoction each year – eh.

There are hundreds, if not thousands of scientific theories that were accepted as factual truisms that were later proven false; phrenology, static universe, expanding earth, blank slate, Martian canals, etc… Each time the argument prevailed that these theories were fact, and society blindly accepted sometimes for hundreds of years before learning they were simply pseudo ideas.

The ego is a fragile part of every human, however when a person is purporting to persuade an entire global population, greater care must be exercised in making statements – as in the shepherd leading his sheep.

Science is an art, subject to the eye of the beholder. When we put science on a pedestal likening it to a god, we are treading dangerous ground – and the consequences could be eternal.

The Religion of Science

What better source to find fodder for a blog than on a Liberal site. Case in point, a video is circulating in which Neil DeGrasse Tyson, an Astrophysicist, explains why he is so dumbfounded that people today would question anything ‘scientific’. He claims that people are today incapable of being able to judge what is truth, what is reliable, and what we ‘should believe’.   Because according to Mr. Tyson, Science is the foundation of the United States…

He further advocates that people who don’t agree with certain ‘viewpoints’ simply don’t have the knowledge to have an opinion and should therefore believe what they are told – verbatim. Specifically; 1. Evolution   2. Vaccines 3.   GMO’s and 4.   Climate Change.

Speaking slowly with a vocabulary and content that might befit a first grade elementary class, Mr Tyson laments that these ‘questioners’, these people of inferior intellect, do not define the ‘country he remembers growing up in’.

According to Mr. Tyson, the world today wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for scientists, they alone are responsible for everything good we have accumulated, including; the atom bomb, bridges that collapse, buildings that fall, forests the burn incendiary fire, cloud seeding that alters our climate, and of course all the ozone depleting chemicals, fuels, and aerosols…   Actually, he didn’t say that – what he did infer was that scientists are gods responsible for everything mankind has accomplished… and if dare to question, we are inherently denying what is true – and therefore we are ignorant. OUCH!

So lets look at the ‘truisms”:

  1. Evolution – by its very definition is a “Theory” created by Darwin in 1853. It includes the ‘hypothesis’ that bears could have evolved into whales because he sees that as a possibility given bears can swim. That part was later omitted from the book. Science defers to a spattering of fossils collected from one particular area that were dispersed and rearranged to become Ambulocetus – a ‘walking whale’. Utilizing an artist to fill in the ‘vast’ empty places, and without any evidence to support the bones came from one skeleton, a new ‘theory was created’.     The Entire Theory of Evolution is based on hypothesis, conjecture, limited information, and alternate views within the community – and is again thus based on unprovable opinion.
  2. Climate Change – by it’s definition is a theory as well because it is based on ‘observations’ that date from 1950’s forward when climate was charted. Everything prior – is based on theory, conjecture, and opinion as there cannot be ‘observational evidence’ which is required in science data. Add to the fray, if science was truly an absolute, based conclusively on evidence and fact, then all scientists would always agree as in 2+2=4. In fact, science is a philosophy of thought that is continually changing and evolving and changing again.
  3. GMO’s – no one denies GMO’s, that is an odd misnomer by Tyson. We simply take issue with the amount of pesticides and chemicals that are being doused and saturated on our GMO foods, and the nutritional value compared to ‘real food’. Those arguments have been scientifically – proven.   Therefore, Mr. Tyson would seem to be ignoring some science in favor of science.   Lest we forget, Science created all those wonderful pesticides that cause deformed babies, multiple cancers, death, disease, and a depleted ozone.
  4. Vaccines – Science has developed thousands of vaccines. Some have been required to be yanked for their failure rate or their side effects, including death, after the fact. Some have been the cause of virulent diseases requiring another vaccine in order to mediate what medicine and science – caused. Those facts – are truisms. Skepticism is born of failure. Vaccines are a trial-and-error. And much factual data supports the truism that the efficacy rate is not calculable because the trend lines showing the cure began years before the introduction of the vaccine. That is natural ‘herd immunity’.   We are also skeptical because often the ‘trials’ are faked, and when a lie is exposed, the natural thought process is – what else was lied about.

Oddly, what Mr. Tyson seems to argue is that people are flawed because we demand truth when it impacts or impairs our life and health. He feels that we should follow like sheep believing everything that ‘they’ the ‘scientists’ ram down our throats without question, because well, they are mini gods who created our world.

Indeed, everything about Mr. Tyson is rather scary, and yet would seem to be hailed by the secular community as their ‘bible’.   Science is a world of faith. Faith in theory. Faith in opinion. Faith in hypothesis. Faith in modeling. Faith in proxy.

Those ‘faiths’ are their religion. And given that religion may not be promulgated by public entities representing any part of our government, wouldn’t that include ALL Science?

It was only quite recently that science was elevated from its classification as a “Philosophy”. Philosophy is a thought or belief, not a fact supported by observational evidence. In the religion of Science there is no ‘consensus’, opinions differ, results differ, observations differ, and the ‘facts’ are routinely altered to coincide with ‘new opinions and assumptions.

While some math is based on absolutes, statistics are based on ‘probabilities’ given certain criteria, although the actual fact is not known. Polls are a popular statistical method for determining the outcome of politics. They have shown to be dead wrong, dead right, and somewhere in-between. A variable, not a fixed number, therefore a – theory.

Even Mr. Tyson’s preferred science, Astrophysics, utilizes ‘predictions’ which is defined as a ‘prophesy’, what someone thinks may happen given the foundations, the natures, and the nuances of science data. The same science is used by gypsies, tarot card readers, and the like.

Tyson speaks from a platform of arrogance. He believes that those who are not of his belief, who don’t have his knowledge, and his wisdom, are simpletons, ignorant and pathetic for they question the accuracy of data whose foundation is – the religion of theory.