Israel and Jerusalem – It is Complicated

The Palestinians are not a heritage, they are a nouveau creation as a result of WWI. Philistine defined a land – not a people. The present day “Palestinians” were comprised of various clans and tribes that fought against their fellow Arabs of the Ottoman Empire. The land never ‘belonged’ to them, they simply squatted there as Bedouins, roamers who refused to pay taxes. The land belonged to the Ottoman Empire, and when they lost WWI, Britain confiscated all the territories and divvied it up however they saw fit.

Today, 65% of Israeli Jews identify as secular or non-religious or atheist. But they are still the Jewish people, booted out of every country.

It is complicated.

It is these Arabs that have become a people without a home – and no one wants them. While the British and the UN created the problem in 1948, they have been unable to solve it.

The ‘discussions’ for a two state agreement, and there have been numerous, have been ongoing for fifty years with NO resolution. Still, the UN demands that someone figure it all out – because they can’t. What they can do is condemn from afar, like Pharisees on thrones. But even the nation that apportioned the EU land after the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Great Britain, can’t find a solution that Israel and Palestinian Arabs agree on. Instead, they seem to want Jerusalem to become a non-entity city belonging to ‘the churches’; Jewish, Christian and Islam. Something like Vatican City – except that Vatican City belongs to one church – Catholic.

I don’t imagine they would be too keen on the idea of apportioning Vatican City…

Fighting between the ‘Palestinians’ and Israeli’s is a near daily occurrence and has been for fifty years. The UN has done nothing to resolve the situation. Europe has done nothing to resolve the situation. The Middle East has refused to partition any of the land on behalf of the “Palestinians” because they know full well that they themselves expelled all the Jews from their lands during WWI and again during WWII.

It was the British who initiated the creation of an Israeli state after WWII given the Jewish people had been extricated from their homes in Europe and throughout the Middle East. It was an acceptable solution and let the Middle East off the hook of reinstating what they had taken.  What it didn’t do was gratify the Arabs then living in Palestine.  However, NO Arab country was willing to take them in with the exception of Jordan which now houses over 2 million or about 1/3 of the population. Most of the Palestinians in Jordan live in refugee camps – they are not granted citizenship or recognized by their fellow Arabs. Isn’t that rather odd?

And yet, these same nations within the Middle East demand Israeli land be given to the “Arabs” living in Palestine, and most importantly, Jerusalem. But the Palestinians didn’t even exist as a people historically, so giving them Jerusalem has no basis in law, Biblical heritage, or fact.

The Pope has weighed in stating that everyone must respect the status quo – but the problem is there is NO STATUS QUO, and there hasn’t been for fifty years, it is a perilous angst that has no end.

The end game is – do nothing out of fear – and hope that a miracle changes the hearts and minds of – everyone. The absurdity of no action is to believe that ‘inaction’ will somehow create – action because of God’s sovereignty. But that’s not how it works. Action is a part of God’s sovereignty. Taking a stance will require – a stance to be taken.

The Jewish people, whether by culture or by religion, have been wasted of their homes and land and possessions that were confiscated by the EU and the Middle East. They were granted a paltry speck of land that is now called Israel, in compensation.   Despite the fact that the historical value is just as tremendous for the Christians of the world, most are quite willing to make a statement of ownership – because ownership does not mean anyone else is prohibited, it simply is a fact of title. Christians and Muslims alike may still visit. We don’t demand to be on the title proclamation! Because that isn’t important.

What is important, is finally making a decision, moving forward, and ending seventy years of endless tit-for-tat fighting.  

Sexual Immorality precedes The Fall

The ever deepening sexual abuse that is surfacing everywhere we look is truly a cavern of Hell. For the most part it has been completely ignored, completely enabled, and completely embraced – even coveted. It is a disease far more insidious than cancer and far more potent than any opioid.   What makes people go to the extremes that they do can’t be cured by a one hour sexual harassment class, or a gnarly wagging finger of reproach.

When a woman in the Philippines is willing to sexually abuse her 2 month old and eight year old while live streaming her acts for an audience in Canada, the UK or the US, the perversity of the world has truly consumed the soul. There are no lines, no boundaries, at all.

The fact that despite the turmoil we are currently just beginning to unveil, politicians will remain ‘unnamed’ and therefore continue without consequence is reprehensible.     Calling out a few to take the fall for the many, will not close the cavern. The stories are a fraction, a speck in the universe of the fall and decay of morality.

Still, in the midst of the media frenzy regarding sexual perversity, front page-center, they highlight a ‘Victoria Secrets Fashion Show’, wherein sexy models parade in garters and strings…   Why is this ‘News”?  While they aren’t ‘the problem’, they certainly are a contributing factor! Do you think those models haven’t been sexually harassed, abused, and assaulted? Don’t be naive.

They are no more immune than the children in The Philippines, the children in foster care, the children in orphanages who have been victimized for decades with little to no consequence to the massive ring of perpetrators.

The Franklin Scandal, the Savile Sandal, all watered, white-washed and shoved under the table while hundreds of thousands of children were victimized, and brutally murdered, sometimes as a part of demonic rituals. While the UK is still ‘investigating’ the claims involving over 1400 politicians, entertainers, sports people and the uber wealthy, the ONLY perpetrators that they will name so far are – dead, because they don’t want to sully anyone’s reputation…

Dead children.

And still, Hollywood claims innocence. Their ethics and morality in no way contributed to the situation we face. The movies, depictions, titillations, were all – okay. Their cover-ups were worth the money they gained. And to name the names is just not worth the cost.

Meryl Streep, who defended Weinstein, has now come out and claimed she was beaten to a pulp, watched as another person was beaten, all while Cher stood as a bystander.   But she isn’t naming who this heinous person(s) is, because she might not make any more money in Hollywood.

Who do you think develops the Dark Web?

The same people who want to unravel our world and create chaos within the grip of Hell. Laughing hysterically while Christians are falling, Jews are supplanted by secularism, and natural laws are nullified. Reverends debate the Creche, a shelter is sued for blessing a dog, cake makers are put out of business, but sexual predators? They get to skate.

The Darknet that hosts the child abuse, sexual exploitation, pornography and pedophilia, has been slowly coming to the surface, finding legal mediums to provide its service to a clientele that includes our husbands and wives, our neighbors, and our children.  The excuse is often, ‘well I was just curious’…  I’ve heard it before.

In Jim Nelson Black’s, Decline of A Nation, he enumerates historical ages which parallel our current course of self destruction:

“In ancient Greece, the first symptoms of disorder were a general loss of respect for tradition and the degradation of the young. Among the early symptoms was the decline of art and entertainment. The philosophers and pundits distorted the medium of communication. Rhetoric became combative and intolerant; intellectuals began to deride and attack all the traditional institutions of Hellenic society.

New thinkers in the society argued for “fundamental change” and called for giving the youth a “voice in society.” Without traditional guidelines, the young men grew wild and undisciplined destroying the old order. Slowly Greece devolved into a disreputable and lawless nation. The Romans conquered Greece in 146 B.C. By placing everything under military authority, they were able to restore order and bring back the rule of law.”

 Sound familiar?  It should.

Black notes that there are three aspects of decay; social, cultural and moral. He states that historically, this lawlessness is found in the degradation of youth, followed by a decline in arts and entertainment, the distortion of communication, combative rhetoric and intolerance, and ultimately the complete collapse of rules and order within traditional religious institutions of society.

New thinkers emerge demanding a ‘voice for youth’ in society, and a ‘fundamental change’. And without guidelines, the youth grow wild, undisciplined and destructive.

This is historic, and it is present day. It dates to 333 BC, to 146 BC, to the Dark Ages, to the French Revolution, etc… What makes it different today is the sheer magnitude. It has permeated every city, country and continent. The ultimate historical consequence has been – martial law.  Today, that would equate to The New World Order.  Because it is about reframing the world, not just a segment, or a colony, or a country.

As people succumb to this Dark World, they are giving up their souls, life has no value, infants and children are bought, sold, abused, and carved up without care.

But we still have a choice. We can choose to succumb, or not, as a person, a city, and a country. Respect, tradition, values, boundaries, rules, order, and religion define a society – and by definition, the absence – destroys a society.

Christmas Creche Controversy: St. Francis of Assisi

An Australian Reverend and theologian who teaches at a prestigious school also – blogs. His latest is a rant against “American” Christians (American Christians are a particular preferred target in this and other of his blogs) who take offense when crèches and other symbols of Christ’s birth are prohibited from displays because they are considered religious and hurtful. In his rant he likens these Christians as deplorable idiots for not understanding that these symbols are meaningless, and goes on to explain just how ignorant American Christians are.

OUCH!

It would appear this scholar, teacher, theologian does not know that as a ‘teacher’, or shepherd, it is not his job to kick his sheep, it is his job to protect them, nurture them and grow them.

I was reminded of Psalm 23, of a shepherd who is tasked with tending to the needs of his sheep, whether they need food, water, or lay caste, they are in constant need of a prod and a gentle hand. It is considered one of the most brutal undertakings a man can be called to in this world requiring a 24/7 workday.  The shepherd protects his sheep from predators, from poisonous weeds, from harsh weather, loving them without judgment as he is their guide, and their only hope for survival.

This Reverend would seem to have forgotten his role as ‘teacher’, and instead of tending his sheep, he chastises them, slays them with his tongue, and ridicules their ‘ignorance’ given he is so much better informed. He has placed himself on a pedestal of worthiness belittling all the lowly for their stupidity, despite the fact that their hearts are in the right place.

And in so doing, this shepherd displays a high degree of Arrogance and Pride.

It is the job of the shepherd to protect the sheep from wolves. It is not his job to turn the sheep into shepherds… But he would seem to be confused. It would also seem he doesn’t much like his sheep given they haven’t the theological acumen that he purports to have. But then, given his actions, his ‘acumen’ would appear to be rather short-sighted… and built more on a core of self kingship.

Perhaps this Reverend would be better suited in a different role, because as a shepherd he seems to feel that preserving the wolves, allowing the sheep to be slaughtered, and kicking them to get them to stand when caste, is a Godly way.

There is a second lesson this Reverend seems to be missing, that of the ‘tongue’. Given his stance as ‘teacher’ he is called to a higher standing than the sheep, and in unleashing his rather bitter plethora of anger, he reveals that he no longer wants to adhere to the guides of his Biblical calling.  And for some odd reason, he targets only American Christians.

He references the ‘ignorance’ of American Christians numerous times throughout his blog, high-lighting such references as to the barn, making claims that during Jesus birth he was most likely tended by a host of women nursemaids all the while bemoaning the depiction of a twig and moss structure as stupid and unrealistic. He is belligerent at the use of ‘donkeys’, claiming there is no such reference and donkeys didn’t exist. But St. Francis would seem to disagree, because he commissioned an ‘ass’, the wild donkey, as a part of the first crèche!

This Reverend takes deep offense to American Christians creating false depictions, and then creates one of his own… while apparently not having researched the history of the crèche, and making assumptions that are not revealed in the Bible.

All the while he has sort of lost the sight, the cause, the value, and the heart of Christians in his bitter quest to denigrate. Why?

He claims that keeping ‘historically inaccurate and culturally anachronistic religious displays in shopping malls isn’t a victory for the gospel at all.’ He further demands that good Christians should burn their nativity scene because it furthers false doctrine.

Saint Francis of Assisi would seem to disagree because it is he who is credited with the creation of the first crèche display whose function was to divert emphasis from gifts and restore Christ as the center. His crèche utilized human participants, live animals, including an ass, and was produced inside a cave. These ‘scenes’ became quite popular and the Catholic church is then credited with elaborating the nativity scene, dressing up the magi in elegant robes thus mimicking the robes of Catholic Priests, as well as adding elaborate marble baubles and various other animals.

These crèches then spread to Germany, Austria, Poland, and England as the popularity expanded.

Creches were not born of American Christians, despite Mike Frost’s prideful denunciation of American Christians.  German immigrants ultimately brought the original pantomime creche performances to the US in the 15th century. Southern Italy is credited with designing such elaborate crèches today that they bring tourists from around the world to view the creativity and enjoyment they bring to children and adults.

Artisans work with delicate diligence to produce absolutely beautiful exhibits throughout Italy, the Vatican and the Czech Republic. While the US creates less expensive models, which Mr. Frost finds quite offensive, the purpose is still the purpose – to remind the sheep and the wolves that this is the day Christ was born.

So, Mr. Frost, Mr. Scrooge, I imagine Saint Francis of Assisi is a might bit better shepherd and source of Christian reverence for Christ. And the fact that the crèche is symbolic in trying to remind us sheep that Christmas isn’t about Santa and reindeer, and snowmen, it is about the birth of Christ is a good thing born of heart.

Bah-Humbug.

Fascism: Trump or Schulz? A Propaganda Tool

Schulz, Merkel, McCain, and a host of ‘journalists’ have all condemned the idea that the US would stand up to North Korea’s bullying and threatening tactics. These war mongering individuals who promote Revolution in Yemen, Sudan, Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela, and Libya, have suddenly become pacifists who angrily and bitterly denounce Trump’s posturing…  

Selective warring. It’s okay when the Pacifists support ethnic cleansing – as in population control – but not okay when a country is threatening to bomb a US territory. In one instance we respond by turning a blind eye, in the other instance we respond with ‘diplomacy’.

Was Hillary’s Benghazi reaction an act of ‘Diplomacy’?

The media seems to have short term memory problems. Not to mention ‘definition’ problems. Fascism in Hitler’s Germany was able to thrive because of control over all media. Information created a belief system.  This more closely parallels our MSM today.

Fascism is actually a bit difficult to define for there are various branches, ideologies, and even a social vs political interpretation. A Monarchy is clearly a social and political Fascist Dictatorship.   But other political concepts are misconstrued onto social precepts, muddying what Fascism truly represents.  Today, the word is carelessly tossed about by the same propaganda media that thrives on ‘control’.

Fascists embrace War and Revolution as necessities of civilization.  That would parallel the protests and riots of today that are organized and embraced by left wing extremism calling for coups and impeachment and divisive anarchy.  It is interesting that both Schulz and Merkel who are quite ‘German” radically denounce Fascism while failing to acknowledge that this same ideology has been the mantra of Germany since 1908 and a causal factor in WWI and WWII.   Capitalism did not instigate World Wars.

Fascists campaign against capitalism and believe in complete government control.. a common Socialist/Communist belief that can more closely be attributed to and align with left leaning Liberal Democrats.

A devout Socialist, Mussolini held to his own manifesto of Fascism that included: a progressive tax, equality of labor unions, national councils/committees, minimum wage, eight hour work day, elimination of religion, nationalizing military contracts, social corporatism,  and nationalization of armature. I’d say that sounds pretty much like the Obama/Hillary platform…

Later, Mussolini attempted to further massage his views via support of the The Roman Catholic Church and of free enterprise – while still upholding to a Monarchial system. His superfluous attempts at free enterprise and corporatism failed abjectly as the Fascist government maintained complete control nonetheless.

When protestors, mostly students, toss around terms for which they have no education, intellect, or history of understanding, they unwittingly become the tool of propaganda. They foment what they are protesting against, and like Hitler’s youth, they become puppets of the state.

Recently I finished reading a book written about Nazi Germany from the prospective of an SS Officer. It provides an interesting look into how the minds of these young men could become so molded and entrenched in a belief that they didn’t previously hold. And even how their brutality was advanced by a systematic numbing and hypnosis of a sort. Even the terminology supported the justification – ‘cleansing’ vs ‘murdering’.

It is difficult to comprehend how these same Jews who were liberated from the Germans by the allied Russians – now embrace Germany and demonize Russia…  The same propaganda that created the Nazi’s is now creating a belief that Socialism and Communism are preferential to Capitalism…

The minds of youth are an empty slate, they can be told most anything because they have no history from which to draw. It worked then, and it works now. The protests, they are a means of creating a Revolution through the molding of an empty slate into a belief that is rooted in propaganda and false truths.

It is theorized that in the Dark Ages, a thousand years of unwritten, unknown and forgotten history, in which the slate was cleansed, the youth were enlisted to fight alongside the Roman warriors and thus Lancelot was created. But the story of Lancelot was created by a French poet sometime around 1150. Hollywood would have us believe the fable is based on fact, when that would be impossible given there is absolutely nothing written during this time to provide any glimpse into society. Scientists attempt to create conclusions based on basically nothing in the hopes of writing what is – unwritten.

 “Indeed, the word of God is living and effective, sharper than any two-edged sword, penetrating even between soul and spirit, joints and marrow, and able to discern reflections and thoughts of the heart.” Epistle, verse 4:12

True, This! —
Beneath the rule of men entirely great
The pen is mightier than the sword. Behold
The arch-enchanters wand! — itself is nothing! —
But taking sorcery from the master-hand
To paralyse the Cæsars, and to strike
The loud earth breathless! — Take away the sword —
States can be saved without it!    ~Edward Bulwer-Lytton

Macron’s First 47 Days… umm

While the media dissected Trump’s first ten days, first twenty days, etc… throughout, as though this performance would be an indicator, there is a rather hushed silence regarding the first 47 days of Emanuel Macron??

Taking office as France’s new President on May 14, 2017, 47 days ago, the only accomplishments that seem to be noted include a photo-shopped photo op, a Versailles speech, and rants about Trump… – and that would seem to be the sum total.  As in ‘Nada’.

The pretty boy with the pretty face is living up to his pretty expectations of doing – basically, nothing. Odd that no one finds this yawn performance unbearably gauche?

While Macron’s Cabinet is apparently attempting to create an Executive Order to ‘reform the labour market’, they are quick to qualify that this would in no way mimic the US or UK initiatives – except that they do. And when will these reforms take effect? Maybe September, maybe later, c’est la vie…

But when backed by the Rothschild family, it would be hard pressed to lose, by the blood, sweat and tears of his “Christ-like walking on water” visage as portrayed by The Economist, a Rothschild media baby.

So why would a man who does little but spend 47 days taking a picture of himself have any beef with Trump?   Because that’s the Driven Line by the left/liberals. Period. They can’t talk about what a great job they are doing, instead they deflect to a negative and join the proverbial Bandwagon of boring, lifeless snails.

Imagine if even half the effort that is displaced on denigrating Trump was redirected toward actually something positive and progressive…? Remember that word? That was Hillary’s new platform – except that she couldn’t define it because no one had bothered to tell her what it comprised.

Liberals tend to talk a lot about how bad other politicians are, while ignoring their own failed economy.

The French government has run a budget deficit every single year since the 1970’s. As of 2012, the debt level had reached 91% of GDP, despite the fact that according to the EU ‘rules’ that number should never exceed 60%. So much for ‘Rules”. Their credit rating was downgraded twice in the last four years, and according to economist, Paul Krugman, the reason the French labour output is so much less than the US is because the French work less. They have what is labeled a “chronic unemployment rate’ at 11%, and a stagnant economy, despite their former Economics Minister – Emanuel Macron.

So what will Macron do differently as President that he didn’t do while Economics Minister? Probably nothing.

Although photo shots and Parades, do make for nice headlines… And what is The Economist all a buzz about with the advent of their newly anointed King Macron? Why, nothing, nothing at all, because he has done – nothing, nothing at all.

But they are seriously attempting to continue their adamant derailment of Trump. Why? Because his actions make everyone else look – well – inactive.

Soros: A Hitler Model Of Globalization

“He alone who gains the youth, owns the future” ~ Adolph Hitler

Emerson College in Boston – 7 people stabbed

University of Illinois – 9 people shot

University of California – 5 people stabbed

Ohio State University – 11 rundown with a car and then stabbed

University of Washington – 1 critically wounded with knife

University of Texas – 4 people stabbed, 1 dead

Northern Arizona University – 1 dead four wounded by multiple gunshots

Rutgers University in New Jersey – 3 people stabbed

Morgan State University – 3 people stabbed

University of Southern California – 4 people shot

Houston College – 12 people stabbed

Virginia Union University – 2 stabbed

This is just a spattering of what ‘the youth’ are doing. All in the name of peace and tolerance and freedom of speech. The destructive mindset has spiraled so far out of control it is beyond repair.  No university is immune. No campus. This is a generation filled with self, filled with anger, filled with the belief that those two ‘feelings’ are born of the inalienable right and freedom that allows them to release their angst in any form they determine is their ‘right’.

Seattle Washington, May Day protests are organized knowing that they will be ‘punctuated’ with physical violence, vandalism and destruction of property.   Why is this allowed?

May 1st Action Coalition. They are an immigrant rights organization that is calling everyone to action in what is termed, “The Resistance”. They aren’t just in Seattle, they are in 30 states and cities across the US. They were started in 2000 by the Center For Community Change which is funded by Democracy Alliance.

The Center For Community Change was launched by The Fair Immigration Reform Movement which is funded by The Open Society Foundation and the Ford Foundation. Full circle? George Soros.

Working with Jerry Brown in California, they have been instrumental in pushing through a bill allowing illegal immigrants the right to financial aid.   But they are also at the forefront in organizing the violent protests that have plagued the US, Paris, Italy and Germany.

Knowing Soros penchant for the Nazi’s it is not lost that Hitler famously quoted,

“He alone who owns the youth, gains the future.”

It would seem that Soros is channeling the ideological thought process of Hitler to achieve what Hitler could not. He utilizes all the same techniques including propaganda which is so pervasive no longer can one discern right from wrong, or good from evil. Utilizing the ‘emotions’ prevalent among youth, he has harnessed movements built on anger, bitterness and entitlement, while subjecting the few to the impervious failure of intellect.

Everything our youth, our Liberals perceive as Truth, is in fact the propaganda fed by Soros utilizing the exact same model employed by Hitler.   Who does Soros want to exterminate?

“It is more difficult to fight against faith, than it is to fight against knowledge.”

Soros greatest opponents are those that adhere to their religious Faith. These are the ones that he needs to exterminate, to put into the Camps, because they pose the greatest threat to his end goal. It is fashioned after the uprising of the Communist Bolsheviks in WWI, utilizing the instigation of youth employed by Hitler in WWII.

So why did Hitler fail?   Poor choice of Allies: Chose wisely and chose from a power of strength:

a)   While under Obama, the US built Saudi Arabia and the UAE into a verifiable fortress with massive sales of weaponry. Maintaining them as an ally was/is now considered crucial given their arsenal. Trump would seem to uphold that relationship despite their rampant human rights violations and disregard for anything moral.

b)   China is an interesting study given they have the ability to stand back and choose sides whenever they feel the necessity. Therefore, it became prudent to bring them into an alliance under Trump for any ‘future’ issues that may arise.

c)   South America has collapsed and offers nothing in fighting power.

d)   Europe has steadily become more and more insignificant in the world agenda as they diverted their resources away from military defense leaving themselves open to the perils of world war.

e)   Russia? Soros hates Russia and wants them decimated.

f)   Canada? Under a Trudeau government, partying and playing seem to be the greatest quest, something Soros uses to disable a country for which he has no respect. Their manpower is 68,000 and their expenditures as a portion of GDP is .9%. They have nothing.

g)   Japan and the Philippines represent strategic positions that need to come under the umbrella.

h)   Australia is being ravaged much like Europe.

i)   India? While Soros Open Society has free reign in India, it is fragmented. They represent a force 20x greater than even Canada and are thus a consideration.

Japan, Europe, and Canada rely on NATO. NATO is a conscription of Soros.  The propaganda IS THE FAKE NEWS that Trump continuously derides.

Soros has yet to penetrate China, Japan, or Russia. They remain the wild-cards.

Trump Salutes Andrew Jackson…

The internet is going a-fly ranting about Trump saluting and speaking favorably about Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson was a Democrat, is the favored sneer. Of course, these educated individuals failed to actually research the Democrat Party during the years of Andrew Jackson, because Democrats favored policies that are today referred to as Republican platforms. The definition of the Democrat Party flip-flopped sometime in the early 1900’s.  But not before going through some hilarious hiccups!

So;   a) Trump saluted a military man (which is an honorable and respectful thing to do), and b) Trump recognized the present day Republican accomplishments of Andrew Jackson, our President from 1829 to 1837.  And somehow this is Liberal fodder for smear and derision…

But alas, history is not taught terribly well in the US, or these ranting people would not speak so disparagingly and reason that there is no such thing as a ‘perfect human person’ we are all damaged and riddled with fault.   There are some that fall into corruption, and there are some who uphold values the best they can. Think King David!  Expectations of perfection are imposed by faulty educators, failed politicians, and Les Miserables.

When a President states their core desire is to elevate the American people into productive jobs, less expensive healthcare, and a more free market system, while draining the swamp – that is a respectful core. Doesn’t mean everything will be perfect! And that would seem to be the loudest critique coming from Democrats, Socialists, Republicans and media pundits. ‘AHA – you made a mistake – impeachment!’ The log in the eye is profound.

The first mistake our esteemed non-scholars tend to make is attempting to implant today’s values, thoughts, societal norms, etc… on every past year, person and animal in history. Hence we are to pay for the transgressions of men who were actually heroes in their day.

Jackson’s military service has been criticized for the wars he fought under the Presidency’s of Madison, Monroe, and Adams, all Democratic-Republicans who opposed the British and viewed each state as its own sovereign entity. He performed his duty and offered his life as service.  If you have issue, go after the ones making the hawk decisions, not the ones giving their lives!

Their second mistake is the fact that the definition of our political parties today has little resemblance with the parties of history. But if our schools actually taught US history instead of Muslim history, we might know this pertinent fact.   In fact the Democratic-Republican Party split into the New Democratic Party (Andrew Jackson), the National Republican Party and the Whigs. The Whigs favored US Congressional authority over the President – sounds kinda like McCain… Many Whigs later joined The Know Nothing Party! A lot simply quit politics altogether.  Sounds like er… those pretty boys…you guess.

The point? It is obviously rather simplistic to take the stance that a Democratic Party member of nearly two hundred years ago would hold to the same tenets as one today and that should give rise to denounce Trump respecting a past President.  Hello!  But, we can still have fun with it!

The Know Nothing Party evolved into The Constitutional Union Party which was formed to battle the desire of many states to secede – now it sounds like Merkel trying to hold the EU together. Continue reading

Hitler Lesson: He was a Socialist

Setting The Record Straight. Hitler is more aligned with the Liberals and Socialists parties in the US and Europe. Hollywood would seem rather uneducated, but the politicians are simply streaming propaganda:

First: Hitler was a member of the Socialist Party. German FM Steinmeier represents the “Social Democrats”, making him more closely aligned to Fascism and Hitler than Trump.  When Steinmeier speaks of the open trade TTP Agreement, he speaks for himself and politicians, the European People aggressively opposed it, and thus it was tabled!

Second: Hitler attempted to gain power through revolutions and coups – which is what the Liberals and the Hollywooders are supporting and instigating; Madonna, Judd, Michael Moore, who I guess identifies as a woman, Sansour, a Sharia Law proponent who organized the Women’s March, want to see America as a peasant state following the lead of the Bolsheviks who ushered in “Communism”.

Third: Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in which he sought to create a ‘single/one society’ that promulgated his views. That would correlate with the ideals of the Liberals claiming they represent All Americans, and US Values when in fact they represent ‘their view’.

Fourth: Hitler rescinded parts of the German Constitution – the Liberals have advocated for a new US Constitution claiming the old one is ‘outdated’.

Fifth: The Reichstag Fire Decree, was an order set in place by Hitler in which anyone who didn’t agree with his dictums could be imprisoned. In addition, publications/propaganda would be suppressed if they were not in line with the administration… sounds a lot like our “Media”.

Sixth: Hitler advocated for all powers over the people to rest with the government – an agenda that is most obviously Liberal Democrat.

Seventh: His exclusion of the Jewish people is somewhat similar to the Democrats anti-Christian stance. It would also align with the IRS in their refusal to grant conservative business’s charitable or political status while simultaneously pushing through Democrat/Liberal applications.

Eighth: Both the French and British Prime Ministers signed The Munich Agreement with Hitler, in alliance with his ideals.

Ninth: A wave of violence against the Jews escalated as rioters broke shop windows and desecrated property… much like the liberal rioters in the US.

Tenth: Hitler believed in ‘invasion’, much like coups and military takeovers that are commonplace today.

Eleventh: Hitler attacked the Soviet Union…

Twelvth: In order for the world to win the war, we needed the massive army of The Soviet Union which became our greatest ally against Germany.

Thirteenth: Hitler was an atheist.

Fourteenth: The “World Order” that Germany’s Socialist and the US’s SocialistProgressives decry has been the same order that created massive welfare and the near end of the Middle Class. They also are the same Socialists rioting and destroying and creating chaos in our streets and in our business’s. They are the same Socialists who have embraced Sharia Law, and elitist political wealth…

Fifteenth: The Bolshevik Revolution ushered in Communist Russia under Marx, Lenin and ultimately Stalin. Initially, the US and UK supported Stalin…

This would indicate that the revolutionary Marchers and Naysayers, and Hollywooders, are actually the ones ushering in the Hitler division of the US as they call for bombing, chaos, and rebellion.

CHRISTMAS – is a Christian Holiday

Christmas is about one thing and one thing only – the birth of Christ.

Prince Charles – It is not about Islam or Muhammed or minority religions, or minority people, or Allah. It is not about Satanic rituals, or screaming and shouting in stores and malls, it is not about hate filled rhetoric, hypocrisy or blame…

It is about the birth of Jesus Christ.

Santa Claus was derived from Saint Nicholas, a fourth century Christian who was revered for his charity and gift giving.   He was a real person, did not fly around in a sleigh, and did not have elves as his helpers.   Nonetheless, even the fantasy Santa of today was rooted in Christian history.

St Nick was Greek, and in 325 was asked by Constantine to appear at the First Council of Nicaea where as a Bishop he signed the Nicene Creed.

The first decorated Christmas tree can be traced to Germany and Livonia where the Brotherhood of Blackheads were said to decorate a tree with fruits and candies for the children. The Brotherhood was a military group of people who rose up to defend Christians that were being persecuted and exterminated by indigenous Estonians during the St. George’s Night Uprising.

The tree was said to be symbolic of the Trinity pointing toward the Heavens.

While there are pagan rituals with respect to evergreen branches being the sustenance of life because they remain green all year round, the evergreen tree was specifically erected as a Christian symbol holding gifts for the children.

These origins have mutated over the centuries to represent different ideas and customs, but that does not change their beginning,, their root or their Christian core.

The Jewish celebration of Hanukkah also has its roots in ancient history coming from the Alexandrian canon which was a part of the Old Testatment Bible of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.  It symbolically represents the rededication of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.

Kwanzaa is a week long celebration represented only in the US and created in 1967 by Maulana Karenga. Karenga, whose real name was Ronald McKinley Everett, was an American black man born in Pennsylvania who became involved in the Black Power movement and black nationalism. His organization fought against the Black Panthers, which resulted in numerous deaths and assassinations. In 1971 he was sentenced to prison for torturing two women which included; putting a smoldering iron in their mouth, being beaten with electrical cords, forcing detergent into their mouths through running hoses, squeezing one woman’s foot in a vise, and being beaten with a baton.

While Christians do not attempt to recreate Muslim holidays or Jewish holidays, or Karenga holidays, it is equally as important to not diminish our own.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Military Conquests – History Lesson

Ghengis Khan is actually given accolade in various Googles of his name, claiming that he was religiously tolerant and helped advance communication and cultural cohesiveness. What these same sites forget to mention is that he was also instrumental in the killing of 40 million people – 10% of the world population!

Julius Caesar – a Roman Statesman, an author of prose.   Sounds serene…  But he also slaughtered a million people and mutilated another million – he crucified mercilessly and yet was considered a great military commander who felt pity for his victims.

Napolean Bonaparte is credited with doing much good – justified in his means, for he was building an empire…

The point? We honor military genius’s for the number of conquests, the number killed, and the cities beseiged and destroyed. History respects them, worships them, even in their most heinous crimes.

How will history read of ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram, al Nusra? Will they be turned into martyrs and heros who fought to liberate the world of evil?

Because I imagine the people slaughtered by Khan, Bonaparte, and Caesar didn’t feel to keen about their fate. How long before Hitler will become a liberator in our history books instead of a man responsible for the slaughter of millions?

As Boris Johnson of the EU and Obama struggle to give ISIS a label other than Islamic terrorists, they are already attempting to rewrite history. NO one has any problem relating the Spanish Inquisition that began in 1477/8 to Christianity or Catholicism. Some historians place the number of lives lost as high as 2 million and hundreds of thousands maimed and tortured. Interestingly, no one calls the Pope and Ferdinand a military hero, in fact it is referenced as “Christian Atrocities”.

So why can’t we label ISIS and their components as Islamic terrorists?

Did all Christians participate in the Spanish Inquisition?

Since Hitler was an Atheist, does that make all Athesits guilty of murdering millions Jews?  Wouldn’t that mean that Google should refer to WWII as the Atheist Atrocity, committed by Atheist terrorists?

ISIS is based on Islam. They preach from the laws of the Quran, they consider themselves to be Salafi, a Sunni branch of Islam, they adhere to dictates and laws of the Quran, and most importantly they believe that their actions are necessary in order to bring about the apocalypse as decreed in the Quran.

They notate major and minor signs of the coming Armageddon including: Major – plagues, diseases, sexual immorality, drought, famine and infighting. Minor – loss of honesty, spreading of killing, acceleration of time, lack of God reverence, an shift in population as in more women than men 50-1, and basic chaos.

But ISIS in attempting to bring about the Armageddon is doing exactly what the Quran defines as the apostates – spreading of killing and acceleration of time. They are trying to create what Allah has defined instead of letting Allah do the work. All in the name of – Islam which calls for world domination and the eradication of all peoples who are not of Islam.

Rather like the Spanish Inquisition.

So how does this playout in comparison to Obama’s comment that compares ISIS to the Spanish Inquisition?

Obama to this day refers to ISIS, not as an Islamic terror group, but as a ‘death cult’. Yet he is quite persistent that the Spanish Inquisition was a Christian abomination. Hypocrisy? Quite so. Immature? Quite so.

I never owned a slave either… so why am I white trash? I never killed an Indian. So why am I persecuted? I have German heritage but that doesn’t make me a Nazi.

So while Obama and by default Johnson would have us taking responsibility for slavery, for the Holocaust, for the slaughter of American Indians, at the same time they should resolve that all Muslims today and for generations to come must take responsibility for ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram etc… in the name of Islam.

Or – he must state that no one is responsible for slavery – they are all dead. No one is responsible for the American Indian persecution – they are all dead. Blacks and Indians and Jews and Muslims and Women must put the past behind and take responsibility for themselves.

Because you can’t take one rule – without the other – unless you stand on the sands of hypocrisy.