Trump Salutes Andrew Jackson…

The internet is going a-fly ranting about Trump saluting and speaking favorably about Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson was a Democrat, is the favored sneer. Of course, these educated individuals failed to actually research the Democrat Party during the years of Andrew Jackson, because Democrats favored policies that are today referred to as Republican platforms. The definition of the Democrat Party flip-flopped sometime in the early 1900’s.  But not before going through some hilarious hiccups!

So;   a) Trump saluted a military man (which is an honorable and respectful thing to do), and b) Trump recognized the present day Republican accomplishments of Andrew Jackson, our President from 1829 to 1837.  And somehow this is Liberal fodder for smear and derision…

But alas, history is not taught terribly well in the US, or these ranting people would not speak so disparagingly and reason that there is no such thing as a ‘perfect human person’ we are all damaged and riddled with fault.   There are some that fall into corruption, and there are some who uphold values the best they can. Think King David!  Expectations of perfection are imposed by faulty educators, failed politicians, and Les Miserables.

When a President states their core desire is to elevate the American people into productive jobs, less expensive healthcare, and a more free market system, while draining the swamp – that is a respectful core. Doesn’t mean everything will be perfect! And that would seem to be the loudest critique coming from Democrats, Socialists, Republicans and media pundits. ‘AHA – you made a mistake – impeachment!’ The log in the eye is profound.

The first mistake our esteemed non-scholars tend to make is attempting to implant today’s values, thoughts, societal norms, etc… on every past year, person and animal in history. Hence we are to pay for the transgressions of men who were actually heroes in their day.

Jackson’s military service has been criticized for the wars he fought under the Presidency’s of Madison, Monroe, and Adams, all Democratic-Republicans who opposed the British and viewed each state as its own sovereign entity. He performed his duty and offered his life as service.  If you have issue, go after the ones making the hawk decisions, not the ones giving their lives!

Their second mistake is the fact that the definition of our political parties today has little resemblance with the parties of history. But if our schools actually taught US history instead of Muslim history, we might know this pertinent fact.   In fact the Democratic-Republican Party split into the New Democratic Party (Andrew Jackson), the National Republican Party and the Whigs. The Whigs favored US Congressional authority over the President – sounds kinda like McCain… Many Whigs later joined The Know Nothing Party! A lot simply quit politics altogether.  Sounds like er… those pretty boys…you guess.

The point? It is obviously rather simplistic to take the stance that a Democratic Party member of nearly two hundred years ago would hold to the same tenets as one today and that should give rise to denounce Trump respecting a past President.  Hello!  But, we can still have fun with it!

The Know Nothing Party evolved into The Constitutional Union Party which was formed to battle the desire of many states to secede – now it sounds like Merkel trying to hold the EU together. Continue reading

Hitler Lesson: He was a Socialist

Setting The Record Straight. Hitler is more aligned with the Liberals and Socialists parties in the US and Europe. Hollywood would seem rather uneducated, but the politicians are simply streaming propaganda:

First: Hitler was a member of the Socialist Party. German FM Steinmeier represents the “Social Democrats”, making him more closely aligned to Fascism and Hitler than Trump.  When Steinmeier speaks of the open trade TTP Agreement, he speaks for himself and politicians, the European People aggressively opposed it, and thus it was tabled!

Second: Hitler attempted to gain power through revolutions and coups – which is what the Liberals and the Hollywooders are supporting and instigating; Madonna, Judd, Michael Moore, who I guess identifies as a woman, Sansour, a Sharia Law proponent who organized the Women’s March, want to see America as a peasant state following the lead of the Bolsheviks who ushered in “Communism”.

Third: Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in which he sought to create a ‘single/one society’ that promulgated his views. That would correlate with the ideals of the Liberals claiming they represent All Americans, and US Values when in fact they represent ‘their view’.

Fourth: Hitler rescinded parts of the German Constitution – the Liberals have advocated for a new US Constitution claiming the old one is ‘outdated’.

Fifth: The Reichstag Fire Decree, was an order set in place by Hitler in which anyone who didn’t agree with his dictums could be imprisoned. In addition, publications/propaganda would be suppressed if they were not in line with the administration… sounds a lot like our “Media”.

Sixth: Hitler advocated for all powers over the people to rest with the government – an agenda that is most obviously Liberal Democrat.

Seventh: His exclusion of the Jewish people is somewhat similar to the Democrats anti-Christian stance. It would also align with the IRS in their refusal to grant conservative business’s charitable or political status while simultaneously pushing through Democrat/Liberal applications.

Eighth: Both the French and British Prime Ministers signed The Munich Agreement with Hitler, in alliance with his ideals.

Ninth: A wave of violence against the Jews escalated as rioters broke shop windows and desecrated property… much like the liberal rioters in the US.

Tenth: Hitler believed in ‘invasion’, much like coups and military takeovers that are commonplace today.

Eleventh: Hitler attacked the Soviet Union…

Twelvth: In order for the world to win the war, we needed the massive army of The Soviet Union which became our greatest ally against Germany.

Thirteenth: Hitler was an atheist.

Fourteenth: The “World Order” that Germany’s Socialist and the US’s SocialistProgressives decry has been the same order that created massive welfare and the near end of the Middle Class. They also are the same Socialists rioting and destroying and creating chaos in our streets and in our business’s. They are the same Socialists who have embraced Sharia Law, and elitist political wealth…

Fifteenth: The Bolshevik Revolution ushered in Communist Russia under Marx, Lenin and ultimately Stalin. Initially, the US and UK supported Stalin…

This would indicate that the revolutionary Marchers and Naysayers, and Hollywooders, are actually the ones ushering in the Hitler division of the US as they call for bombing, chaos, and rebellion.

CHRISTMAS – is a Christian Holiday

Christmas is about one thing and one thing only – the birth of Christ.

Prince Charles – It is not about Islam or Muhammed or minority religions, or minority people, or Allah. It is not about Satanic rituals, or screaming and shouting in stores and malls, it is not about hate filled rhetoric, hypocrisy or blame…

It is about the birth of Jesus Christ.

Santa Claus was derived from Saint Nicholas, a fourth century Christian who was revered for his charity and gift giving.   He was a real person, did not fly around in a sleigh, and did not have elves as his helpers.   Nonetheless, even the fantasy Santa of today was rooted in Christian history.

St Nick was Greek, and in 325 was asked by Constantine to appear at the First Council of Nicaea where as a Bishop he signed the Nicene Creed.

The first decorated Christmas tree can be traced to Germany and Livonia where the Brotherhood of Blackheads were said to decorate a tree with fruits and candies for the children. The Brotherhood was a military group of people who rose up to defend Christians that were being persecuted and exterminated by indigenous Estonians during the St. George’s Night Uprising.

The tree was said to be symbolic of the Trinity pointing toward the Heavens.

While there are pagan rituals with respect to evergreen branches being the sustenance of life because they remain green all year round, the evergreen tree was specifically erected as a Christian symbol holding gifts for the children.

These origins have mutated over the centuries to represent different ideas and customs, but that does not change their beginning,, their root or their Christian core.

The Jewish celebration of Hanukkah also has its roots in ancient history coming from the Alexandrian canon which was a part of the Old Testatment Bible of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.  It symbolically represents the rededication of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.

Kwanzaa is a week long celebration represented only in the US and created in 1967 by Maulana Karenga. Karenga, whose real name was Ronald McKinley Everett, was an American black man born in Pennsylvania who became involved in the Black Power movement and black nationalism. His organization fought against the Black Panthers, which resulted in numerous deaths and assassinations. In 1971 he was sentenced to prison for torturing two women which included; putting a smoldering iron in their mouth, being beaten with electrical cords, forcing detergent into their mouths through running hoses, squeezing one woman’s foot in a vise, and being beaten with a baton.

While Christians do not attempt to recreate Muslim holidays or Jewish holidays, or Karenga holidays, it is equally as important to not diminish our own.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Military Conquests – History Lesson

Ghengis Khan is actually given accolade in various Googles of his name, claiming that he was religiously tolerant and helped advance communication and cultural cohesiveness. What these same sites forget to mention is that he was also instrumental in the killing of 40 million people – 10% of the world population!

Julius Caesar – a Roman Statesman, an author of prose.   Sounds serene…  But he also slaughtered a million people and mutilated another million – he crucified mercilessly and yet was considered a great military commander who felt pity for his victims.

Napolean Bonaparte is credited with doing much good – justified in his means, for he was building an empire…

The point? We honor military genius’s for the number of conquests, the number killed, and the cities beseiged and destroyed. History respects them, worships them, even in their most heinous crimes.

How will history read of ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram, al Nusra? Will they be turned into martyrs and heros who fought to liberate the world of evil?

Because I imagine the people slaughtered by Khan, Bonaparte, and Caesar didn’t feel to keen about their fate. How long before Hitler will become a liberator in our history books instead of a man responsible for the slaughter of millions?

As Boris Johnson of the EU and Obama struggle to give ISIS a label other than Islamic terrorists, they are already attempting to rewrite history. NO one has any problem relating the Spanish Inquisition that began in 1477/8 to Christianity or Catholicism. Some historians place the number of lives lost as high as 2 million and hundreds of thousands maimed and tortured. Interestingly, no one calls the Pope and Ferdinand a military hero, in fact it is referenced as “Christian Atrocities”.

So why can’t we label ISIS and their components as Islamic terrorists?

Did all Christians participate in the Spanish Inquisition?

Since Hitler was an Atheist, does that make all Athesits guilty of murdering millions Jews?  Wouldn’t that mean that Google should refer to WWII as the Atheist Atrocity, committed by Atheist terrorists?

ISIS is based on Islam. They preach from the laws of the Quran, they consider themselves to be Salafi, a Sunni branch of Islam, they adhere to dictates and laws of the Quran, and most importantly they believe that their actions are necessary in order to bring about the apocalypse as decreed in the Quran.

They notate major and minor signs of the coming Armageddon including: Major – plagues, diseases, sexual immorality, drought, famine and infighting. Minor – loss of honesty, spreading of killing, acceleration of time, lack of God reverence, an shift in population as in more women than men 50-1, and basic chaos.

But ISIS in attempting to bring about the Armageddon is doing exactly what the Quran defines as the apostates – spreading of killing and acceleration of time. They are trying to create what Allah has defined instead of letting Allah do the work. All in the name of – Islam which calls for world domination and the eradication of all peoples who are not of Islam.

Rather like the Spanish Inquisition.

So how does this playout in comparison to Obama’s comment that compares ISIS to the Spanish Inquisition?

Obama to this day refers to ISIS, not as an Islamic terror group, but as a ‘death cult’. Yet he is quite persistent that the Spanish Inquisition was a Christian abomination. Hypocrisy? Quite so. Immature? Quite so.

I never owned a slave either… so why am I white trash? I never killed an Indian. So why am I persecuted? I have German heritage but that doesn’t make me a Nazi.

So while Obama and by default Johnson would have us taking responsibility for slavery, for the Holocaust, for the slaughter of American Indians, at the same time they should resolve that all Muslims today and for generations to come must take responsibility for ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram etc… in the name of Islam.

Or – he must state that no one is responsible for slavery – they are all dead. No one is responsible for the American Indian persecution – they are all dead. Blacks and Indians and Jews and Muslims and Women must put the past behind and take responsibility for themselves.

Because you can’t take one rule – without the other – unless you stand on the sands of hypocrisy.

Slavery – UN Demands – America Pay Up

The UN is recommending that the US make payment reparations for every descendant of a “black” slave. If we do a simple extrapolation based on population; 330 million people, 12-13% black – that would amount to 42.9 million blacks. No one has suggested a $$$ amount, but let’s just throw out $100,000 each for round numbers (the death benefit for RECA payments to military members subjected to radiation poisoning that resulted in death was $75,000). That would mean we would hand out $4.29 trillion in slave benefits. Given our current deficit is close to $19 trillion – that would mean a fell swoop of an additional 22.6%!

Of course we could always just tax every white person in the US for their fair share… With non-Hispanic whites accounting for 62% of the US population, that would mean 204.6 million people, including children, would ante in about $22,000 each – for the average household of four, that would mean $88,000…

What a ridiculously stupid idea? Who is the UN?

Of course, there would be a fraud calculation which would add to the government calculations and add to the payments in the vicinity of 10-20% as is typical, dead people would come alive, and a mass exodus of citizenship would occur among the more wealthy out of principle.

I think I want the UN to decree that ALL women need to be compensated monetarily for their treatment as property for hundreds of years at the hands of all men. I’m sure we can find a good payment method for the 49.6% of the 7.4 billion population – $37 trillion sounds about right.

Or maybe we should compensate all people for their respective inhumanities against each other for inhumane treatment throughout history – as in those who gave their LIVES during wars for a bunch of ingrates.

Or maybe we can sue the government for allowing these atrocities to occur and every government employee is responsible for the compensation as a result of incompetent management.

Oh wait – this could be fun! Let’s make every UN employee responsible for the compensation of every failed initiative, every rape, sexual assault, mal-treatment, mal-feasance, offensive language, inability to secure freedom and safety for every citizen of Africa, Asia, and South America! That sounds fair…

Each and every descendant of anyone who ever served in the military would be given a reparation for the suffering those fine men and women endured!

Maybe the Egyptians should make monetary reparation for all the slaves they used during the period 3000 BC to present.

Eghads, imagine how much money we would have to shell out to each other for our various heritages going back to the beginning of time? Of course, then we’d have to agree on when the beginning of time occurred, and that would most definitely present a problem within religious and strict science definitions.

Who is this UN authority? The UN Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent. The group was established in 2002. Of course, given that the US is not the only country to enslave slaves, all countries would have to comply. Who heads this group? A white woman, Mireille Mendes France. The agenda? Afrophobia.

Who is Mireille? Her grandfather was a descendant of African slavery in Martinique (which is garble speak for her ancestory of slavery was many generations removed and since have faired quite well in a middle to upper financial zone – far removed from the pestilence and poverty of Africa that her ancestors live today). Her mother was the illegitimate offspring of African, Indian and European descent who lived a middle class lifestyle, which was considered – French?   Her father wrote numerous books and was considered a follower of Marxism and a great influence on Malcolm X and Che Guevara. He was instrumental in the formation of the Economic Freedom Fighters, a revolutionary Socialist movement in South Africa that advocated a Marxist-Leninist societal structure.

So lest you think there is an agenda to the sweet French something Mireille, be assured – there is. It is called Communism.

This is the very same UN that we support, that determines WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN and HOW we operate as a country –

Are you ready to be The United States of Communist Populace?  Because this is the AGENDA.

Huma Abedin – Our Next President

By default – when Hillary is ‘confused’~

Imam Zain al A’abedin. Huma Abedin. Jordan Zain Weiner. Zain Endeavors, LLC.

Huma Abedin’s profile is about as transparent as Obama’s school record.

Little known and even less proven. There are no family photos, in fact no photos of Huma prior to her affiliation with Hillary. She does not openly declare if she is Sunni or Shiite, and while her mother is a vocal advocate of Sharia Law and all it’s implications including female genitalia mutilation, stoning, and lashings, Huma is silent. While no one attacks Ms Abedin’s intellect, her heritage and affiliations do seem a bit problematic.

Huma Abedin’s father was Syed Zainul Abedin. He is considered to be a direct descendant of Khawaja Moinuddin Chishti. Chishti, an Imam and scholar is said to be a direct descendant of Muhammad. The name Syed (including different spellings) is used specifically to denote a descendant relationship with Muhammad. Does that make Huma a descendant of Muhammad by her father?  Is her ‘seed’ being positioned in the World Order?

The name Jordan in ancient Aramaic means, ‘one who descends’. Zain means, beautiful one’. While Huma’s father was Shiite, her mother is Sunni. Articles continually point out that Huma’s mother is connected to The Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that is apparently embraced by the US, but has been decried a terrorist organization in Saudi Arabia where Huma was raised. Being found to support them financially or in any ideological manner is punishable by prison for a period no less than 3 years and no more than 20.

But the Saudis have had a vibrant friend/foe relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood over the years, with the terrorist label slapped on just this past 2014, and a new claim of alliance being rumored today.

That being said, how is it even conceivable that Huma, her siblings and her mother are not in jail if in fact they are related to The Muslim Brotherhood? Her mother teaches at a tiny girls school in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and Huma has visited the country since her enshrinement with Hillary, all without incident. Could it be that her lineage is her salvation and protection?  And why Hillary?  Easily, she is the perfect conduit, the patsy, the puppet.  Hillary is a stage.  The play – is much more complicated.

The predominant reason the Saudis don’t like the Muslim Brotherhood is that they consider them a threat to their supremacy and monarchical rule because the Brotherhood adheres to a more revolutionary front of Sunni Islam.

In the early years of Assad rule in Syria, he was considered an ally of the US by the CIA, various military intelligence divisions, and the FBI, for his invaluable information regarding al-Qaeda. In fact, the information he supplief was considered the best and his relationship with the US was hailed!

What prompted his alliance?  He believed that The Muslim Brotherhood was an off-shoot of al-Qaeda and The Brotherhood was attempting to infiltrate Syria calling for a Sunni uprising and jihad. Attempting to eradicate the jihad threat, thousands of Brotherhood members were killed. But when Rumsfeld demand ed that Assad give over Hezbollah in return for help against The Brotherhood,  Assad refused having a moral alliance with Hezbollah.   And Rumsfeld turned.

Who exactly is Hezbollah?  Hezbollah was initially formed as a para-military unit of about 1500 men organized by Iran to combat the Israeli takeover of southern Lebanon.  In other words, they were created and organized to battle the invasion and takeover of a portion of  Lebanon by Israel.

The turvy world then propped up Assad for destruction because he was not willing to bend to the corruption and thus his country was thrown into rubble, with The Muslim Brotherhood as the ‘good guy’ and Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.  What evolved from this deception was a boatload of anger.

Not sayin’ I support one or the other, just observing:

So, why do we, the US, cater to The Muslim Brotherhood despite their open claim agenda for world Islamification? They are considered by some as the parallel of Hitler’s Nazi’s. In Arabic, The Brotherhood is called, Ikhwan, a group that openly collaborated with Hitler, assassinated Anwar Sadat, and employs Malik Obama, President Obama’s brother. They support Erdogan, created Hamas, created CAIR, and are said to be affiliated with ISIS. The finger pointedly points to the Obama regime. In 2010, he began a crusade in support of The Muslim Brotherhood, in support of Sharia Law, to the dismay of Egypt, and Libya as in Benghazi.  And to the dismay of many within the US.  As in, “what the hey!!!!!%^&I*$#…”

So where does Huma fit into this profile? There is a precept within Sharia called, ‘maruna’ that advocates lying and false impersonation as a valid doctrine of faith. This doctrine is widely accepted as a means of sowing division and confusion – by The Muslim Brotherhood. Hence, Huma’s very odd marriage to a jewish man, in complete contradiction to the values instilled by her Sharia Law mother. Perhaps he was the unwitting shill, the man who followed his lust instead of his values and morality. He was easy.  And perhaps the vow Huma has for Hillary, knowing that her innate’ confused mind’ will ultimately lay the table for a a Huma dictatorship.  As she is really the ‘man’ in control.

Is the abdication of the ‘confused’ Hillary simply a precursor to the potential rule of Abedin as her most trusted and loyal advisor. Is Hillary the real pawn and the betrayal a play waiting to happen? Is Abedin raising her child to be the new messiah within the lineage of Muhammad? Is that her coronation? IS that what gives her and her mother the ability to reign within Saudi Arabia despite their Muslim Brotherhood connection?

When Truth and Transparency are hidden, it is not surprising that questions arise…

When Truth and Transparency are exposed, it is not surprising that there is nothing – to talk about.

Princeton Slavery to Black Agenda

Princeton folds. Woodrow Wilson, is being beheaded and a bunch of idiotic privileged children are to blame. ARGHHH!

History cannot be eradicated no matter how hard you try. It is persistent. It is stubborn, and no matter what you might dislike about it, you have no power to change the facts.   So a bunch of overly spoiled elite children attending the prestigious school of Princeton which boasts a ‘racial diversity’ of 7%, well above the 4% of black youth entering colleges around the US, want to expel Woodrow Wilson from history, and Princeton is bowing to their demands.

Wilson was born in 1856. The Civil war was fought from 1861 to 1865, 150 years ago!   He was a part of the Confederacy as were 11 states including; Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas, South Carolina, Virginia, Louisiana, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.   These states fought for slavery.   Headline: They lost. But if these bored, unimaginative, pompous students have their way, I suppose we should ask these states to succeed from the United States because of their Confederacy stance.

In fact, anyone who has any connection to these states must no longer be allowed to do business because they are obviously racist. Any relative of anyone who was a part of the confederacy should face civil penalties, a trial and a lashing. This law shall be in place for perpetuity. In addition, given that some blacks were slave owners as well, they too shall be subject to this law.

The first slave owner in US history was Anthony Johnson, a black man. Prior to Mr. Johnson’s assertions, indentured servants were forced to work for a period of seven years per a contract and then they gained their freedom, bought land, and ran farms. But when one of Johnson’s indentured servants reached the end of his term and left a free man to work elsewhere, Johnson sued the new employer and won the right to own his servants and indenture them for as long as he wanted. Thus slavery was BORN.

Halleluiah, slavery in the US was created by a black man.

This would mean that all descendants of Mr. Anthony Johnson should hereinafter be jailed and horse whipped… In 1860, 3000 blacks/Negroes living in New Orleans owned slaves which represented nearly 30% of the negroes that lived in the city!

In contrast to their white counterparts, most black slave owners owned upwards of 10 to 80+ slaves, while most whites owned 1 or 2 with a small percentage (1%) known as slave magnates who owned 50+.

Does this mean we must hunt down these black slave owners and erase their names from history?  Apparently a slew of university students would believe this is a proper agenda today.

But slavery was not merely a black conscription, white Irish prisoners were sold into the slave trade by James I, King of England in the early sixteen hundreds. White slaves were sold to Antigua and Montserrat where 70% of the population were Irish slaves. As a result of this slave trade, Irelands population went from 1.5 million to a mere 600,000 in one decade.   They were sold to New England, Jamaica, Barbados, and Virginia. And the practice wasn’t abolished until 1839. They worked the land for their black owners as well as their white owners.

The point of history is to learn the whole truth, not just selected bits and pieces edited and transcribed for a false premise and a false doctrine for perpetrating chaos and divide.

Moral:  The point is that slavery was not a racial agenda, it was an elitist agenda that dates back thousands of years. It crosses all lines of color and is rooted in society, culture and money.   So, my children, ‘before you cry fowl, it might be wise to see if the wolf is a person of color… or something much deeper in our psyche that has its beginnings in – the Middle East.’  History lesson 101.