Month: March 2017

Soros Destabilizing EU brings US and UK Together

Posted on by Helena

After bungling the US election, Soros is still brazenly active in world destabilization – particularly in the UK.   It wasn’t that long ago that he gained media attention when he began to demote and deride Merkel for her actions and non-actions, predicting that she would be impeached, replaced, and become a target of hatred across Germany and the EU.

But then she complied with Soros demands and all was good…

That same agenda is now being promulgated against Theresa May with Soros ‘predicting’ she won’t last and will soon find herself on the proverbial street having mismanaged the Soros UK.

In his dismantling, he notes that BREXIT will be hailed as the cause for all the ails and ills of all of Europe. He claims that the economy and the pound sterling will tank and the UK will find itself in deep distress.

In his rooster strut – Soros, via EU Commissioner Donald Tusk, has declared that Gibralter is no longer a sovereign part of the UK and belongs to Spain and the EU. This is of course on top of the UN claiming that as a result of BREXIT, the UK owes them upwards of $50 billion. And now, Tusk is attempting to micro-manage the UK by mandating their tax and trade rules even as they have relinquished their EU membership.

Control is a very destructive bedfellow.

However, the EU may have over-estimated its power.

If the EU were to attempt to control and manipulate the UK through economic measures or even sanctions, there are ready, available and eager alternate markets drooling for a larger share of trade, including; Russia, China and the US.

With Trump and May declaring a Commonwealth relationship between the UK and US, with Trump looking to equalize trade deficits with China, with Trump leveraging the sovereignty of the US, the dramatic ‘shift’ in globalization control and manipulation is being tethered. And remaining members of the EU could find themselves in very dire straits as a result, with Germany at the helm as she is the only one left with any substantial funds.

It may be this is the true veiled threat that Soros is predicting when he says that the EU is staged for a fallout. The power and economic control of the EU is grossly misunderstood. While it exists, it is not without alternate competition. And the countries that recognize this trade potential are more than willing to comply with any shortfalls.

Soros game has relied nearly exclusively on emotion instead of wisdom or intellect. He preys on people’s emotions to drive their intellect, instead of vice-versa. Trump has shown amazing resilience despite the massive attacks from all fronts.   Theresa May has also shown a steady set course despite all the attempts to create gale forces and sink her tenacity.

The tyranny of the Global Protocol has never been so challenged. It is running and it is making Yuge mistakes. Under-estimating the power of knowledge, the alternate media has not censored the truth.

With the new WikiLeaks revelation regarding the ability of the CIA to camouflage hacks by diverting source code into a Russian, Chinese, Farsi or Saudi forensic – Marble 7 changes the entire evidentiary matter of the CIA. With the revelation by idiots verbally gloating about their role in manipulating intelligence on Trump, with the evidence piling high against the Obama administration in a conspiracy far far greater than Watergate – the Soros cabel is ramping up propaganda.

Stand fast Oh Captain, My Captain – our fearful trip shall soon be done.

Obama Intel Taps – Evidence Mounting

Posted on by Helena

While the charges against Obama and his administration mount on evidence, proof, admissions and testimony, the craze against the Trump-Russia connection is still simply a bunch of unsubstantiated angry words. It doesn’t seem to matter how many Democrats continue the same rhetoric, each time, the empty words are taken as Gospel.

I think it would behoove the media to focus on more pressing issues, solutions and positives for a change.

For example: McCain’s infantile bully-bash of Kim Jong-un, was hardly diplomacy at it’s finest… but given he knew the effect his brash remark would have, we can only deduce it was made purposefully.

Example 2: With the EU Commission imploding financially after BREXIT, Juncker would be far more diplomatic if he wooed Trump instead of tossing about threats that he will instigate a Texas and Ohio secession… Really?

Example 3: Why won’t the press talk about Yemen? Could it be because Obama and the Saudi’s colluded in a completely illegal campaign to destroy a country just for funzies?

Example 4:  The fact that Germany is being asked to ante up the total sum they reneged on in their 2% military spending obligation for NATO has somehow missed much of the press.

Example 5: And then we have the UN suing the UK for lost wages and anticipated pensions and lost gifts and bribes and money they desperately need to payoff the victims of their peacekeeping sexual predators…

What ever happened to investigating Hillary’s Foundation? Benghazi? How do all these things vanish and no one has any consequence?   Hillary’s latest foul was apparently to maintain security clearance after she was no longer in the State Department thereby allowing her access to highly complicated and secure information. How come no one bothered to mention that three years ago?

Is our internal intelligence so daft that they never noticed, or is it that they were bribed, or is it that they colluded? Possibly – all three.

While the slime of the swamp is slowly being unearthed, fear is rising exponentially, and with fear the hope that chaos will create a diversion has taken hold.

But here’s a journalistic report worth the garbage heap: According to Reuters, the UN is tch-tching Trump for the US trend of curbing freedom of speech. They cite as evidence the ‘peaceful demonstration against the North Dakota Pipeline”.   Problem? The cost to cleanup after the peaceful protest cost taxpayers over $1 million, included abandoned dogs, and toxic sewage.   THAT IS NOT freedom of speech. That is a bunch of misaligned demeaning entitled malfeasants who obviously are not contributing to society via a JOB. This would also align with the peaceful protests of Black Lives Matter (also mentioned by the UN), or the Ferguson riots… that destroyed hundreds of private businesses and resulted in millions of damage.

According to the UN – those are the examples of the US shutting down freedom of speech. And while articles continually quote ‘the UN experts” they never quote a name or names or exact quotes. In fact, the ‘quotes’ are most likely Soros related given he has a post at the UN. Or maybe they come from the ever bastion of human rights activists – the Saudi’s…

Given the media – and even the conservative media – instead choose to have journalistic freelance to condemn and betray their own President, or give an entire feed to Pence’s marriage values, it would seem that the referendum of chaos is quite busy indeed.

It would be really nice – if someone just told us – what the heck is going on. For real.

Because, this is beyond Fake News – it is Dead News!

Sanctuary Cities – Are you One?

Posted on by Helena

ARE YOU A SANCTUARY CITY?

I wonder how many people registered in cities and counties across the US are even aware that they are classified as a ‘Sanctuary City’? Of course, the pins are concentrated throughout California, Oregon, Washington and the northeast. In addition, there are quite a few pins in Colorado and Illinois.

As a resident of Colorado, I don’t recall a vote on whether I agreed to label my state, city or county as a sanctuary city? I think I would have noticed that voting block on my ballot. But oddly, it wasn’t there. Which means that our government here in Colorado is making a blanket choice as my representative that I hugely do not agree with. Do not financially support. And worse, now have put our People’s at peril for less Federal support – without even asking if we – agreed.

Such a massive decision – should arguably, absolutely, be put forth to The People.   And it seems to me that a politician who makes such a decision on behalf of the People, has grossly over-extended his Powers.

Apparently, Denver and Aurora are Sanctuary Cities and stand to lose Federal Funding Big time unless our government representatives decide to ‘represent’ the People – instead of a select few.

So how much does Denver and Aurora stand to lose? About $200 million. Adding in Boulder which has announced it’s sanctuary status – that amounts to an additional $10ish million. Where will these cities rap these losses? Why our pockets of course through increased taxes.

Sorry – no one asked me…

While Denver mayor Hancock claims that Denver is compliant – the fact remains – it is not. And actions are more substantial than whines.

Are you a sanctuary city? Don’t rely on the whines of your local government, check out the Federal response – because they are the ones holding the purse strings…

If you live in California, Oregon, or Washington, if you live in Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania and anything north – chances are – you are a Sanctuary city. Anything inside Illinois – you are a sanctuary city.

For the Feds, there is absolutely no incentive to alter what is – it is cha-ching – money in the bank. For you – it is cha-ching – money out the door as now you are not only responsible for the lost funding, but the lawsuits, the increase in inmate prison costs, and the insurance losses that raise rates that WE PAY.

Angry? You should be. This is a policy/stance adopted by your state and city and county representatives without – a popular vote.

A Soros Coup in Russia – Alexei Navalny

Posted on by Helena

For Putin, Alexei Navalny is something of a Hillary/Obama headache.

Navalny is the grandstanding activist who routinely voices opposition to Putin, has attempted to impeach Medvedev, and routinely holds unsanctioned protests in Moscow and St. Petersburg. The western media hail him as a demi-god in much the same fashion as Hillary and Obama.

While Navalny’s background as an activist is lengthy, starting in 2000, however, in 2014 a worthy connection was made:

In 2013, Navalny ran for mayor of Moscow pegged under the party RPR-PARNUS. PARNUS (Peoples Freedom Party) which is a liberal, social political party led by Mikhail Kasyanov, and is an associate member with the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats For Europe (ALDE)- an extreme Socialist organization. Navalny pulled out of the race after he was sentenced to prison for embezzlement and fraud.

In 2014, Boris Nemtzov, a co-chairman of the Russian “Peoples Party”, worked on a project of coalition between Navalny and Khodorkovsky who headed The Open Russia Foundation. The Open Russia Foundation is a parallel organization to Soros Open Society Foundation. The original board members of Open Russia were Henry Kissinger and Lord Jacob Rothschild.   It is referred to as a philanthropic NGO, and after being shut down in 2006, it relaunched in 2014 creating an activist platform against Putin headed by Navalny and Khodorkovsky.

The New York Times and Washington Post have both supported the work of Open Russia as well as Khodorkovsky.  That alone should be proof positive.  But there is more.

In 2015, Russia banned two of Soros NGO’s; Open Society Institute and Open Society Foundation. CNBC refers to these organizations as ‘pro-democracy’ and their work in Russia as simply aimed at helping Russia transition from communism.  Hmmmm.

The founding members of ALDE (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats For Europe) included The Free Democratic Party of Germany which supported the SS and Nazi’s. Other founding members from France to Luxembourg and Britain are politically far left Liberal Socialist. Which coincides with the Rothschild/Soros agenda for a One World Open Society.

So, while Trump has to swat the annoying buzz of Hillary and Obama like flies attacking sheep in the summer, Putin is busy with the likes of Open Russia and a particularly annoying fly named Navalny.

Today, Navalny is making the US media headlines, including Fox News, for the fact that when he organized an illegal protest in Moscow, he was arrested and jailed with a sentence of 15 days.

While the headlines from The Guardian, Newsweek, Chicago Tribune, BBC and New York Times, all very liberal and aligned with Hillary gate, all declare this arrest to be a further denouncement of Putin’s ‘thugocracy’ in censoring free speech!   Lest we forget, a) We have no right whatsoever to make any statement with regard to Russia’s politics or laws b) Their government is sovereign – as is ours, c)   Remember the DC Women’s March?,   d)   Remember all the Anti-Trump protests – that have resulted in numerous arrests?

The Russian protocol for arresting protestors is governed by law and involves taking them downtown, confirming and noting their name and address, and then immediately releasing them.   They are not formally arrested. However, Navalny is an instigator, and that is different, so his arrest is completely lawful.

The State Department Spokesman, Mark Toner, has denounced the arrests…   Why?

Toner is a hold over from the Obama administration having served with Victoria Nuland, a Bill Clinton patriot. She is best known for a phone conversation she had with Geoffrey Pyatt in which they discussed who they felt should be appointed to government positions in Ukraine after the US backed coup, adding an expletive with regard to the European Union.

Mark Toner is a part of the “Swamp”.

Navalny represents the world of Soros. He has received unprecedented funds for his candidacies as mayor and president all of which point to the potential for a classic Soros backed coup attempt in Russia.

Sadiq Khan – London a Beacon of Islam

Posted on by Helena

Sadiq Khan, elected London’s mayor May 2016, has been quite a verbal orator when it comes to denouncing Candidate Trump and President Trump. He made no bones about his public support of Hillary Clinton, stating that he knew she would be the victor.   Sometimes, when a politician opens his/her mouth to deride the accomplishments of another, it opens the Pandora Box and all the diseases are released.

And so, during his tenure as mayor, exactly what has Khan accomplished? While running for mayor, the following were his platform points:

  1. He was anti-Brexit
  2. He promised that he would provide 50,000 new homes his first year, 50% in affordable housing wards.
  3. He would freeze all rail fares for Londoners.
  4. He said he would impose a daily fee on higher polluting vehicles entering London.
  5. Encourage businesses to stay and more to come to London as an open city.
  6. Promised to stop neighborhood police from being fired.
  7. Rent freezes.

How many affordable homes has he provided? None. In fact, he has now declared that the funds that are stipulated for the project, 3.15 billion euro, will be disbursed sometime before 2021. Problem? The mayoral term is 4 years, he could be out in 2020… Problem? His promise was ONE year. But it isn’t his fault – it is the fault of all the greedy developers…

Obviously BREXIT occurred.

After he was elected he declared that he changed his mind about rent control.

The daily fee on high polluting vehicles?  Shhhh.  Not possible.

He altered his promise with respect to railway fee freezes and redefined what that would look like – it would apply to single and pay-as-you go fees. Most Londoners buy travel cards which won’t be respected in the freeze.

In fact, he has actually done very little to nothing during his nearly one year tenure with the exception of pronouncing himself a feminist and participating in an LGBT parade. Which shows he has all the same real political capabilities as a Trudeau or a Macron.

What Sadiq Khan has done is attempt to demean President Trump by claiming he would love to ‘educate him on Islam and its compatibility with western values”. It would appear that this education in Islam might be reversed…given this latest terrorist attack by Islamists…

Khan gave multiple interviews in which he called Trump ‘ignorant’. In contrast, Trump was more dignified toward his comments about Khan. Perhaps Khan should consider respect classes…

Backed by Ken Livingstone, the first mayor of London, who advocated for Marxist ideologies, Socialist doctrine, anti-Semitism, and pro-Fabian Society rhetoric (like Justin Trudeau’s father), the pool of Rothschild influence is thick with blood and oil.

In 2012, when speaking to a group of worshippers at a mosque, Livingstone was quoted as saying, “if elected I would educate the mass of Londoners about Islam, and turn the capital city into a beacon of Islam”.

In fact, the creed of The Islamic Forum of Europe is “from ignorance to Islam”. Sounding like the denouncement made by Khan against Trump? The Islamic Forum was originally a Bangladeshi group. Khan’s heritage is Pakistani and Indian.  The Forum’s aim is to move London away from secular left politics and replace it with Islamist politics.

And so full circle, enter Sadiq Khan, who embraces Islam. As of 2011, the percentage of Islam followers was pushing 13% in London although some neighborhoods are well over 50%.  And lest we forget, the London election was riddled with controversies including; tampering with ballots, falsified ballots, falsified registrations, closed polling stations, and outright fraud. And it wasn’t – the Russians.  Who could it be???

South Africa – Ethnic Cleansing of Whites

Posted on by Helena

There is a less publicized parallel story happening right now that seems to mirror the black on white atrocities our media fails to report. South Africa has been under siege and the reports can only be found on ‘alternative sites’, the same sites the media wants to censor.  And the crime is ethnic cleansing of whites.

It’s called xenophobic genocide and it’s being perpetrated against foreign nationals across South Africa. The chant advocated by South Africans and President Zuma is “Kill the Farmer! Kill the Boer!” The Boers were Dutch farmers who settled in South Africa in the 1600’s to escape British persecution.

Since the ANC Party took control of the government, 70,000 white people have been brutally murdered.   The ideology is to kill the farmer, and rape his wife and children for no other reason than a genocidal retaliation. Whites are hacked to death, tortured, burned, gutted, and shot. In addition, during the reign of the ANC Communist Party, unemployment rose, poverty among whites rose significantly, and immigrants are considered a threat and the target of attacks, rapes, and murders.

The tactics seem to mimic the cries heard quietly across the US, where one such case occurred in Mississippi wherein gangs called for the rape, murder and torching of all white women. In 2014 a 19 year old white girl in Mississippi was douced with gasoline and torched – alive.

According to statistics released for 2013, the average number of murders in South Africa each day is 47, burglaries is 714, 394 vehicles are broken into daily, and rape, well that is at crisis levels. Instead of reporting rape to corrupt authorities who will likely do nothing, the families ask for retribution in the form of a monetary bribe. Still, despite the non-reporting, South Africa has one of the highest rape statistics in the world.

Gangs in South Africa are prevalent and vicious. They no longer perpetrate their violence against other gangs, but target anyone, particularly whites. Routinely, shops are destroyed, shop owners murdered, businesses shutter and the economy has begun a severe contracted spiral.

Gang members pretend they are taxi drivers, pick up women, rob them and rape them.

In the US, blacks offenders are equal to white offenders according to FBI statistics, despite the fact that the black population in the US is roughly 12%. The disparity is not politically correct, but it is Truth.  It would seem that blacks everywhere are angry, and whites are their targets.

And while the past, history, has prevailed as the underlying cause of this anger, there is a wholly lacking logic.  While it rose in South Africa during the Mandela and ANC Party rule, in the US the Obama administration created a catastrophic hatred not seen for over fifty years.  The focus – white colonization.

In South Africa, whites make up less than 9% of the population. Colonization is history.  It has been quashed.  Ethnic cleansing is the rule. But South Africa is certainly not alone. Zimbabwe, and President Mugabe, set the rule that killing whites was “Godly”.

The cry was echoed by Obama when he declared whites the perpetrators of slavery and colonialism – when in fact Muslims have always been the largest slave owners, and colonialism is rooted in every century under the guise of slaughter, rule and power. Few, if any, ethnicities have not participated. Colonialism is simply another word for attack and rule. Phoenicians, Mycenaeans, Babylonians, Sabaeans, Parthians, etc… This concept of conquer and rule, is not a white ideology, it is a mankind ideology.

Still, I am appalled that Liberals ‘claim’ we today are at fault, we must be punished, we must pay for ‘history’.   And in so doing, by default, are perpetrating the same colonialism that they decry as heinous.  Only the colonialism is by the blacks.

The only way to stop it, is to recognize it. Murder is not recognition, it is the continuation of the exact same agenda you claim to detest.   But there seems to be only a single sidedness to the concepts embraced by the Liberals;  tolerance, love, compassion, equality, etc… these terms are only so good as they benefit one agenda only.  How can they be so BLIND?

The Guardian – Trump Impeachment!

Posted on by Helena

The Guardian is headlining a Trump Impeachment story that is rife with pathetic sources and unproven allegations.

  1. They quote an “influential, 13 term Democrat Congresswoman”. This unnamed influence is none other than Maxine Waters, a disgraced Congresswoman who was involved herself in allegations of corruption wherein she and her family gained monetarily as a direct result of her actions in Congressional decisions, including TARP.

She had a close relationship with Fidel Castro, thanking him for helping people who needed to flee political persecution.

In 2011, Judicial Watch named Maxine Waters as one of the ten most corrupt politicians.

A video of her slamming Shell Oil CEO at a hearing reveals she is a Liberal Socialist stating; ‘This Liberal is about taking over and the government running all of your companies”.

She is continually quoted as demeaning Trump, and stating that she will initiate impeachment proceedings because he ‘doesn’t have good values”, he “is acting in this manner”, and he’s “the most outrageous and ridiculous President”.

This is The Guardians prime source for a Trump Impeachment.

  1. Their second reasoning source is the FBI Bombshell announcement. And who do they source? Why the esteemed, Dan Rather.  Rather claims that the Trump-Russia allegation is going to be bigger than Watergate… Of course, Rather was the main character of the Rathergate Controversy in which 6 documents critical of George Bush’s tenure in the Air National Guard proved to be forgeries. Much like the Trump Dossier…

Rather was fired along with his story producer Mary Mapes. In 2007 Rathers initiated a lawsuit claiming wrongful discharge of employment, while still claiming the forged documents were true and that CBS was simply using him as a scapegoat. The suit was dismissed by New York State Appeals Court in 2009.

This is The Guardians secondary source for a Trump Impeachment.

  1. Their third choice is John Bonifaz, an attorney who has created numerous ‘non-partison’ Liberal organizations aimed at election reform. He also attempted to find grounds for the impeachment of George Bush for misleading statements that led to the Iraq War.

His statement that is used to convict Trump is, “I think there are many members of Congress who are deeply troubled.   I think it’s only a matter of time before a resolution gets introduced in the United States Congress that starts this process of an impeachment investigation in the House of Representatives.”

He then states that Vice President Mike Pence will be the one initiating the process.

This is The Guardians third source.

This isn’t the first time the Pence rumor has floated and it is sounding more and more like a deliberate fakery in order to ‘divide and conquer’ at the very core. Only the Liberal media have run this line – without any evidence whatsoever.

But then The Guardian has a trail of tears from laughingly calling for the assassination of Bush, to hiring a Muslim terrorist to write copy for them. While they claim they had no idea he was a member of the Hizb ut-Tahrir terrorist organization, that doesn’t exactly bode well for a new organization claiming they are the best and most trusted and most in-depth reporters and journalists…   They hired a terrorist knowingly.

They have been labeled anti-semite, have had gag orders placed on them for releasing confidential information, and if that isn’t enough:

“The Guardian and its parent groups participate in Project Syndicate, established by George Soros.”

Aw shucks…  He does have the fingers of a million Octopi!

Politico, another Soros spearhead for ‘independent news’, continually derides Trump.  An impeachment article they ran April 17, 2016 calculates that such impeachment proceedings will be initiated by McCain, Graham, Pelosi, and Ryan. 

Nothing new here given they are all Soros wolves.  But the Pence allegation is clearly a shadow stab to derail and divide.  Not his style.

Fake News? Liberal’s Elementary School Curriculum

Posted on by Helena

Teaching Kids News… is the Newest Big Money Agenda.  Given our era of fake stories and biased stories and inaccurate stories, and un-researched stories, it would appear that the Liberals are not content to manipulate our Big People media, and have begun a mind manipulation of public schools – beginning as young as age 3.

The concept is that media focus should be cued to reputable, approved sites that have been culled to frame one particular point of view. Theirs. The claim is that they are providing an unbiased vision into the current event news stories and rewriting the content to fit the dumbing down to different levels of understanding based on age.

So, I thought I’d take a look at the curriculum content provided by one such site that offers it’s news tabloids to school curriculums: “Teaching Kids News”. While their claim is that they believe in choice and truth, they also seem to want to censor alternative news sites stating they are most likely to convey fake and false news, while the top tier are the most valued; Washington Post, New York Times…etc.

A story they published concerning newly appointed NSA Michael Flynn, was ripe with innuendo, bias, propaganda, manipulation, and was nearing if not on target to making false and misleading statements, aka lies.  Partial points of one story include the following (although the entire story read like a Hillarygate email):

“When one of Donald Trump’s advisors (National Security Advisor Michael Flynn) was asked if he had talked to the Russian government before the U.S. election, he said no. But that was a lie. He had to resign (quit his job) because of his lie.”

“But in this presser, Trump seemed more interested in complaining about the media and bragging about his own accomplishments. For more than a year, Trump has been saying that certain media tell lies. The news organizations he doesn’t like are usually the ones that are not saying good things about him.”

This story was geared for sixth graders.  At the end of the story, they state that they are ‘biased’ but that other reporters don’t admit to that and so they are bad and they, TKN, are ‘good’…WHAT???

The entire point of their supposed program is to provide Truth, not bias garbage! The most important lesson is lost – teaching a child how to make their own informed opinions. Instead, this one woman show, Joyce Grant, is simply a fake/false/biased news feed.

Common Sense Media is another organization heralding their version/vision of what media and news children should be made aware of given the bias of the editor. With a whopping $25 million annual budget, a former Board Member by the name of Chelsea Clinton, and a CEO, James Steyer, who was a partner with Hillary Clinton on the Too Small To Fall initiative, their Board of Directors are a Who’s-Who of Democrats with affiliation or allegiance to Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Hmmm.

Their grants include two very small amounts to a school in Omaha, and one in Denver. Otherwise, their entire expense budget of $16.1 million covered salaries, rent, and travel. Their Balance Sheet reflects nearly 100% in cash or equivalents hording to the tune of $20 million.  Sound familiar?

They attest to ‘the best books’, ‘the best news sources’, ‘the best movies’, ‘the best TV, websites, best blah, etc…’   For example, for teens, the best news is Huffington Post Teens (Full disclosure, Huffington Post is one of the funders). And ‘the best for character development’ included 99% television movies and other movies, only a spattering of books.

Having been hailed by Chief Obama as the best source of media censorship available for children, the company is funded by NBC, Comcast, DirectTV, Time Warner, Nickelodian, Google, Best Buy, AT&T and NCM. What do all these company’s have in common?   1.   They all supported Hillary Clinton. 2.   And they all will likely profit significantly as their television, web search, and movie channels will be pivotally promoted!

In essence, what we have in our public education system is classes beginning as young as 3 years old in which the news, the media, and information is completely controlled by Democrats, Hillarygates, and Liberal propaganda dictating to and molding the very core belief system of our children, all the while promoting the very same companies profit margins. As in – CHA-CHING.

Quite a YAK!

FYI  – The Bible got 3 stars.

US = NATO Sugar Daddy

Posted on by Helena

It is odd how the media portrays the NATO issue that is at the forefront of the Merkel and Trump hostility. While few countries within NATO ante up according to the rules, the US has somehow become the Entitlement Program, the Welfare supporter for Europe’s military.

Germany does have their own military, of sorts. There are roughly 60,000 troops and a budget of roughly $48 billion which has remained relatively unchanged since 2001 and represents just 1.2% to 1.5% of their GDP. Merkel has been under fire for not meeting NATO criteria and simply shifting the burden on the US. Her response? She will work on it – and maybe by 2024, Germany will be able to meet the legal requirement.  Not exactly a spiffy response…

Of the twenty eight members of NATO, only five made or exceeded the 2% rule. Why?

There are some who believe it is too steep and interferes in the 3% deficit rule imposed by the EU on its member states. It then becomes something of a juggling of funds from one basket to the other – like Kiting checks.

Unfortunately, this argument opens up the Pandora Box of the EU concept as a whole. The migrant crisis as a whole. And the welfare system as a whole.

The five countries meeting the 2% rule include: US, UK, Greece, Poland and Estonia. Oddly poignant is the fact that Greece meets the military requirement but is sanctioned for not meeting the EU 3% deficit requirement.

Germany is pitiably at the bottom of the chart currently hanging out with The Netherlands (1.2%), Canada (1%), Denmark (1.2%), Belgium (.9%)and the rest of the deadbeats who feel no compunction to meet the criteria.  Perhaps, imposing sanctions and fines and penalties would wake everyone up.  A consequence – what a novel idea…

What good is a rule if no one respects it enough to meet it?

Given the US is shouldering anywhere from 3.6% to 4% of GDP, it is understandable that We The People might have a problem with that discrepancy. Located in Brussels, NATO primarily spends all it’s funding on the EU. And while the EU is our ally, propping up their entire military is not in The Constitution…  it is more of a Sugar Daddy effect.

NATO defense spending has specifically targeted Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Poland and Portugal. It becomes rather impertinent of Merkel to take a holier-than-thou attitude about Trump’s position on NATO spending when Germany hangs out with the 1.2% crowd and refuses to come to the plate. And in fact, after the 2% ratification agreement in 2014, Merkel ‘reduced’ military spending by 1.3% which would coincide with the influx of 2 million immigrants into Germany in 2015.  Kiting checks.

In addition, this immigrant crisis diverted NATO funds to ‘helping the refugees’. By default, that means that the US is the largest financial supporter of refugees…in Europe.

But Merkel’s reaction to the US not continuing it’s propping up of NATO for the EU is like getting persnickety at your bank when they bounce a check because you refuse to cover the dollars. And then turning up your nose at the NSF fee, and demanding the bank front you the money. How dare the bad bad bank do such a thing!

The fact that the US and UK virtually support NATO actually creates a hierarchal Commonwealth with the EU as a ‘subject’ of the Kingdom overseen by the US and UK. I doubt that the Europeans would think highly of such a societal pecking order, and yet their Socialist agenda still demands the US act as Sugar Daddy.

Why? Entitlement. But it’s also a lack of explanation and argument of what is and has happened.   The Europeans truly believe they are more informed and educated than the Americans. The Canadians truly believe they are more informed and educated than the Americans. And yet, they fail to see that we ‘uninformed Americans’ support them financially.  We would be more than happy to stop that funding…  thus dismantling the global Socialist, Communist Kingdom hierarchy…  Which is why Merkel – is running scared.  She is entrenched in that agenda with the Rothschild and Soros agents fervently working the helm.

But that’s the power of Socialism – it creates a false reality in which everything is – what you are told to believe.   A child told he/she is stupid, will ultimately believe ‘they are stupid’, it has nothing to do with reality and everything to do with the power of persuasion and manipulation.

And so we have a persnickety Merkel, angry and offended by Trump, because he is considering pulling the rug from beneath the global round table and in so doing will reveal the reality of all the dust-bunnies that lie beneath.

Planned Parenthood Exposed?

Posted on by Helena

Tucker Carlson recently interviewed the EVP of Planned Parenthood in what he surmised was a waste of time, and I would agree. But something was missed. While we continue to focus on the fact that Planned Parenthood performs over 330,000 abortions per year in the US, what is equally important is that they use US taxpayer funds to perform abortions in; Sub-Sahara Africa, Central America and the Caribbean, and South America.

In fact, according to their 2015-990 Form, about $12 million was spent outside of the US, $300,000 in Canada, and $9 million was spent on ‘Investments’ in Central America and the Caribbean. Total grants to Domestic affiliates amounted to $61 million. Payroll internally amounted to about $58 million, consulting fees including legal and accounting amounted to about $34 million, IT was $10 million, Office $13 million, and travel and conferences amounted to about $10 million.

That means, of their $218.184 functional internal expenses, about $70 million was disbursed to their subsidiaries including US and worldwide abortions, entailing more salaries, consultants and expenses, leaving a 68% cost to cover Administration of Planned Parenthood central.

Even worse: Again, taking into account they are a non-profit, their ending Cash amounted to about $113.6 million and Traded Security Investments were $238 million! For an organization that claims their main concern is the welfare of women, they seem to horde an awful lot of liquidity.

According to an infectious disease expert at the University of California, Planned Parenthood sells various STD test kits via their App at a cost 10 times what the test would cost at a public clinic and 20 times the cost of a federal clinic. Federal Clinics are already available for: the homeless, underserved area populations, migrants, and public housing residents. They have been around since 1991 and have 6000 sites scattered around the US. In addition, general health tests and services are available at Universities…

Seems Planned Parenthood is simply a tool for creating salaries, wages and expenses for services that are already available for those who have no money or access to healthcare…

They paid about $7.6 million in fees and $7.5 million of expenses to raise $64 million from donors. But for a non-profit, their assets and spending habits are a bit interesting:

They sold a ‘condo’ which they claim was their NY office space for $69.6 million!  Nice Digs.

While they are affiliated with and control a number of Trusts as well as a C Corporation, they also control a number of tax exempt organizations, including three engaged in political activities, an Obamacare canvassing group, an advocacy group and an ‘Anonymous’ real estate LLC, whose name is “434W33CHC, LLC”.  Why would they require anonymity?

According to Lifetime News, Planned Parenthood had committed to performing over 273,000 abortions in specific African regions by 2015. With the media lavishing over the Zika Virus, Planned Parenthood immediately stepped in and cried for abortions on demand in Brazil, El Salvador, and elsewhere throughout the Central and southern regions of South America, Haiti, and the Caribbean with the help of the UN.

According to Planned Parenthoods website, they charge about $1500 per abortion ‘often less’. At the $1500 cost * 332,000 abortions, that would amount to revenue of $498 million. Let’s discount the cost to an average of say $1000. That would amount to annual revenue of $332 million.

They claim that most of their work is in healthcare and STD testing performing over 2 million per year with an average cost of $30 for outside lab and about $25 to Planned Parenthood. The revenue for that would amount to $50 million.

So which procedure is more profitable?

And lastly, it should be noted that Planned Parenthood prepares its own financials and tax forms internally – then sends them to an outside accountant for ‘review’, not audit.