Climate Change – Hurricane Madness

Remember the Paris Accord, the Green Climate Fund that was touted as the savior of the world – with the help of $100 billion annually?  Remember that fund that Germany and France and the EU described as all important to sustainability?  Remember how Trump was demonized when he pulled the US out of the agreement and the world chastised and ridiculed him?

Apparently, not even Germany gives a hoot any longer.

Why?  They can’t even begin to come close to meeting emission targets as presumed and simply have given up – the task is daunting, the funds ridiculously outside of reality, and the efforts lame.

According to the latest report by the OECD and NCE, they claim that ‘infrastructure spending needs to exceed $7 trillion per year through 2030’ in order to combat climate change.

Since it’s inception, the Paris Accord Green Climate Fund has raised a total of $10.3 billion in pledges – 20% of which came from the US under Obama.  The EU is not a contributor, Russia and China did not pledge anything, and some of the pledges are actually merely ‘loans’, not full cash gifts.  Based on the $7 trillion required per year since 2016, they are shy $21,989,700,000,000.

The Board at Green Climate has allocated 58% of its funds to Asia and Africa  through intermediaries.  These intermediaries are supposed to dole out the money toward specific goals and objectives. So who are the intermediaries?   World Food Program, The World Bank, United Nations Development Program, UN Food Program, Inter-American Development Bank, etc…

None of the allocated funds are utilized for actual climate change, they are simply redistributed to banks and organizations who have no requirement to delineate transparent use of funds.  In fact it appears that the UN and banks receive the far majority of funds and then disburse the funds as a loan to the project country with ‘commercial rates of interest’.  A win-win for Banks and a slush fund for the UN.

While infrastructure spending can help mitigate natural disasters, like sea-walls for hurricane flooding crisis’, the Green Fund projects seem more aligned to boost agriculture and energy projects – both of which help the underlying shift in land ownership in Africa which is concentrated in higher income locals with ties to the government, China, Middle East, Netherlands, UK and US.  Latin America is no different.  And in reality – has absolutely nothing to do with climate change.

The World Bank recently proposed instituting an annual land tax in Africa which they claim would be utilized to help the locals who are continually displaced due to the Land Grabs. Full Disclosure:  World Bank has been involved in the Land Grabs…

Does this mean that Climate Change is a farse?  No.  It means the Paris Accord was a sham, a Ponzi scheme to reroute funds to support land grab biofuel production while displacing hundreds of thousands of African people.

It means that banks are receiving the money, have absolutely no over-sight, and lend the money that was a gift while charging heavy interest fees that they pocket.

Germany’s carbon footprint has increased over the last few years, China’s is exploding, France and the Netherlands are tackling the problem by stating they will attempt to phase out diesel and petrol by 2040 and 2025 respectively.   Really?   Emissions per capita rank;  Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Australia, US, Saudi Arabia and Canada as the highest.   Only a spattering of Africa countries even make the list…  Hence the new definition of Climate Change – Infrastructure.

Since the US pullout, most other countries have tabled caring, because it was never about caring, it was about lining banks pockets and free infrastructure in those areas of Africa where the land grabs required better access and more water.

And despite the massive number of hurricanes and cyclones pounding countries and wreaking havoc, no one mentions building sea-walls, canals, moats, gullies, etc… to mitigate damage control.

Weather manipulation has reached far greater capacities than we can imagine.   From radio frequency manipulation, to stratosphere solar deflection, to carbon capture, to cloud brightening techniques, climate geoengineering is very real and very destructive.

Harvard is apparently at the forefront of solar geo-engineering, partially funded by Bill Gates, Pritzker Foundation, The Open Philanthropy Project, and the Arnolds, the same Harvard that has accepted funding for such projects as Evolutionary Dynamics (infectious disease evolutions) for which Jeffrey Epstein was supportive.

Basically, it all evolves around the concept of the Greater Good, wherein only the select shall survive in the utilitarian view of the greater good central to hedonistic self pleasure and profit.

As in:  If we, the banks, can’t have WWIII, then we, the Cabal, will create profit from other destructive means.

Syria Rebuild: Germany Bidding for Contracts?

Syria is still in the gray throes of media efforts to spill a rather topsy-turvy rendition of what happened, including the notion, as stated by Germany’s, DW.com, returning Syrian refugees from Germany to Syria, is not going to happen…  In addition, Germany feels that the Assad regime, ‘depopulated the areas in which insurgents were strong’and this alludes to Germany claiming the refugees are all opponents of the Assad regime and Assad will therefore torture and kill them…

Ok, there are rather striking and obvious misstatements!

  1. If Syrian refugees want to go home, how can Germany refuse to allow them unless they consider them prisoners of Germany?
  2. Assad ‘depopulated the ‘insurgents’ also known as ISIS, al Qaeda, al-Nusra, and a host of radical terrorists which Germany, the UK, US, and Canada initially aligned with under Obama before alternate media pointed out these were the ‘bad guys’ beheading, raping, torturing, plundering and killing!

Which means that Germany’s government controlled media is already attempting to rewrite history instituting themselves as savior instead of perpetrator.  A rather bold approach but one that mimics the false media Protocol that is censoring news across the globe.

In the midst of this, Russia has already released documentary evidence to European governments and the UN, which proves the same White Helmets and ‘insurgents’ who were hailed as hero’s, are planning anotherchemical attack in Idlib, the last stronghold that has not been retaken by Assad.  The media plume has most likely already written their articles and ‘op-ed’ on the attack well before it has happened.   Of course, it goes without mention that Germany and the UK will undoubtedly blame Assad and Russia, the scapegoats for everything Soros.   Despite the obvious.

Film crews from Middle Eastern channels as well as ‘one major US media station’ are already pre-screening the coverage of a future attack…  Make-up, camera’s, action, screams, running, devastation… a movie in progress.

And lastly, it would seem that Germany has somehow forgotten that Syria is not a German territory, but a Syrian country governed by Syrians for Syrians in their quest to determine what will occur in Syria, for whom and by whom.

Within this bizarre rhetoric, the German government is arguing about how to rebuild Syria with the help of the UN without actually giving any money to Syria’s government, aka Assad, which sounds rather like the de facto coup that was the rationale to destroy Syria in the first place!

Apparently, Germany is not exactly paying attention, or else they are filling the minds of Germans with false news because Assad gets to determine whose money he wants, and Germany, the US and Saudi Arabia are NOT on the list.  So the discussion is rather arrogant.

Apparently, Germany is under the odd belief that they are annexing Syria and using rebuilding as blackmail.  Only Syria’s government and the Syrian people don’t have a say-so.    Because Merkel doesn’t recognize them as people…

So what does Syria have left that Germany so desperately wants?

Oil and gas fields still exist, but it would appear that governance over land is most important for transpipelines, for control of farming and agriculture, and for ‘rebuilding’.  Whoever owns the land dictates the contracts.    As in the US, the Syrian government can dictate eminent domain and confiscate all land from foreign governments – but I imagine a new emboldened fight would ensue…

In 2015, the Guardian published an article in which the plight of Syrians was analyzed.  Contrary to the media publications today, Syrian’s left Syria not because of Assad, but because their country was being bombed to oblivion by Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, US, UK, Germany etc…, and between 357,000 and 500,000 people died, roughly 1/3 were civilians.  Of course the numbers are rather oblique.  During wars, the numbers tend to have a range of +/- that defies reality.  For example, deaths attributed to WWII range from 50 to 80 million – how do you lose count of 30 million people?

At any rate:   There was no infrastructure left, no hospitals, no houses, no markets, they left because their country was being reduced to rubble.  Not because of Assad, but because the aforementioned governments concluded that a new regime needed to be created, likely at the behest of the Saudi’s in a tit-for-tat blackmail scheme.

In the meantime, Syria is holding its own conference in Damascus wherein attendees include Arab and expatriot businessmen willing to fund the redevelopment of Syria, including partners from Iraq and Yemen.  I imagine Russian and Iran are also allowed to bid, and will most likely retain the drooled over contracts that Germany counted on should Hillary have won the election and apportioned the booty – much like after WWi and WWII.

But that plan has been foiled.   Only Germany is still pretending.  Shhhh, don’t tell them….

NATO: A Freefall into Oblivion

Shortly after we got transferred back to the states in the late 1960’s and my dad went to work for the Pentagon, the proverbial shitake mushrooms hit the fan as the defense budget costs were audited revealing $1000 nails, gold toilet seats, $5000 paintings, etc… It was an embarrassment but it showed how budgets were created, inflated, and spent.  It also showed – why?

In the government, when you submit a budget, if you don’t use up all the allocated funds, the subsequent year you are given less.  Therefore, some genius came up with the idea of overspending so that each subsequent year you would get more.  That’s how it went in a nutshell.  And that’s how it continued from the advent of Democrat Lyndon Johnson, until present day.

In light of Trump demanding that NATO allies immediately spend the ‘required’ 2% of GDP on defense, the backlash is typical – “the USAF spent $32,000 on special cups”. Therefore, Trump is a spendthrift who can’t call out member states who don’t ante up their part.

Of course, they have completely missed the point.

The oddball spendthrift is the one country that is the EU’s wealthiest, Germany spending just a tad over 1%.  Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Norway, Canada, Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania all underspend according to the NATO rules of Protocol. And they all have since 1991 when Clinton was President and the Soviet Union was dissolved.   The threats for which NATO was created; Italy and the Soviet Union, no longer existed.

Of 29 member states, 5 meet the 2% threshold, Poland is quite close, and the remaining don’t.  So why have rules at all if no one cares to abide by them?  Why have NATO is even the EU’s wealthiest nation refuses to pay their fair share?

Yet somehow, Trump is the bad guy…

Trump called for the 2% mark to be met immediately with a future goal of 4% and the media is going ballistic.  Why? Because they say the US doesn’t spend that much, in fact the US spends only 3.6%…  Interesting argument.  Trump is apparently setting the stage for an increase in defense spending and the media completely missed the message.

Adding to the idiocy is the fact that Merkel who just instituted an extension of sanctions against Russia, simultaneously signed a deal for $11 billion to bring the Russian pipeline into the EU, and demonized Trump for even criticizing the hypocrisy of the situation, while demanding that the US continue to pay the bill to protect Germany from the ‘bad guy’ – Russia.

In 2017, Germany reported a 41.2 billion Euro surplus which represented 1.2% of their GDP.  SO why didn’t they meet their NATO budget criteria if they had the funds to do so?   Military expenditures represented roughly 10% of their Revenues.

The reason they don’t is because no one is crying wolfe!  They are not called to their word.  And their integrity has flatlined.

NATO:  The US was initially not a member of NATO until Democrat, Harry Truman, decided that including the US would help to expand the globalization goal in eradicating communism – ie, Soviet Russia and Fascist Italy.   At the time Germany was not a member given they were the front for WWII.  In 1955, despite France’s adamant denunciation, NATO brought West Germany in as a member.  By 1966, De Gaulle had transferred all defense forces out of NATO due to the perception that it had become a US/UK stronghold.

Short term memory: France did not return to NATO until 2009 with advent of Obama’s Presidency and the rise of the Global elite cabal.

While NATO membership continued to expand from its initial 5 countries as of 1948, it is not clear why given the threats it was created to deter had long ago been eradicated.  Still, it was somewhat of an elite party and everyone wanted to be on the list although no one wanted to pay their fee, they likened it to a freebie supported in most by the US.

Over the course of it’s life NATO has worked somewhat in conjunction with US military forces. Essentially, they became a US adjunct financially, while the EU states that it was formed to protect continued to pay less and less over the next 26-27 years from 1991 to 2018.  The US military budget is $886 billion.   That accounts for over half the Discretionary Spending and roughly 20% of the entire Federal Budget.

NATO is obsolete. Whether or not they accomplished anything of value since their ascension to power is debatable.   Their purpose has been removed from existence over the last 26 years.  EU and Canada have recognized this and their contributions have been on a steady free fall ever since.

Dump NATO.

US Foreign Aid Goes to Pay For US Coups?

In 2011, Obama demanded Congress give Libya $17 million in aid to help counter terrorism, improve their military and secure their borders.  One month later Obama ordered an attack on Libya claiming Qaddafi was a dictator.

Obama then stated he wanted $120 million for Yemen in 2012 to promote democracy and human rights. And in 2015, Obama backed the Saudi war in Yemen.  Technically, the War in Yemen invoked by Saudi Arabia and assisted by the US and UK is still not considered a war per se, it is instead referred to as an ‘Intervention” that has lasted 3 years.  It’s all a word game.

The US backed coup in Ukraine during Obama’s tenancy, cost the US $5+ billion.  Today, the Ukraine is an utter mess of destabilized factions amidst the rise of right wing Nazi’s.

Before we destroyed Syria, Assad was our friend and ally who gave our intelligence agencies valuable information.  Syria has cost the US over $1 trillion.

Of course, lest we forget, this was the President given the Nobel Peace Prize that was determined before he even took office.  We like, and then we don’t, and so we – destroy.

Today, a German NGO is wandering the Mediterranean trying to find someone, anyone, who will accept 230+ Libyan migrants picked up at sea.   Germany doesn’t want them.  Italy turned the boat away, as did Malta.  Spain is brimming and refusing one more.  The NGO claims that given the situation in Libya, since its destruction while ousting Qaddafi, taking the Libyans back to Libya would possibly violate human rights.

So the boat has nowhere to go and wanders aimlessly.

The goal of the NGO, Mission Lifeline, is for the EU to grant visa’s to anyone and everyone who wants to come to Europe – that is, if their country of origin is Africa or The Middle East.

So the humanitarian crisis of immigration and refugees that Europe so embraced and demanded – is now a war of sorts as reality sets in and the governments realize they made a grandiose boo-boo.  And the Open Borders – are being Shut Down.

Oddly, many of those same governments, chastise Donald Trump for closing US borders, because well, its Trump.

The Mainstream EU government politicians do not have a flipping idea what they are doing!  They simply do – as they are told – and then attempt to fix the mess – the way they are told.

Maybe they should take the refugees to Ukraine?  Given they made such a glorifying success story of that coup.

And what happened to all that “Aid Money” that Obama so freely disbursed?

When Qaddafi was assassinated, he had wealth estimated at roughly $200 billion.   He was three times more wealthy than the second richest in the world, Carlos Slim, who is now the first.  Money held in some banks was seized by the various governments, including $37 billion in the US.  Other banks simply kept the funds.  And billions in gold that Qaddafi buried, have yet to be recovered – supposedly.  While the UN wanted an accounting, it would seem many countries decided – no.  And the UN said, “Okay.”

So if Qaddafi was worth $200 billion, why was the US giving Libya a dime?

Seems a bit convoluted unless the entire Libyan coup was designed to confiscate money.

And like most “Aid” to beleaguered countries by the US, Ukraine is no different with reports stating that the money is used to line the politician’s pockets.   Of course finding actual news on Ukraine is not likely to be truthful given the only agency remaining since the coup is the Kiev Post which is virtually dictated by the new and improved President, Poroshenko.  Chocolate Man.  His wealth is estimated to be roughly $1.6 billion, an increase of about 60% since taking over as President.

So why do we give Ukraine money?   Why don’t they invest in Poroshenko’s chocolate factory which is making beaucoup bucks?  Instead, they are limping along with GDP growth of 2% (which is somewhat lower than it was before the coup), inflation nearing 14% (which was at ZERO for the previous two years before the coup) and raucus backstabbing throughout their government.

Tell me again why we give them money?

All this comes about after someone asked whether we were giving aid money to El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico given their export of migrants to the US?   And the answer is yes, consider millions.  We give money to a government that is considered corrupt enough that it’s citizens decide they must flee to the US and illegally enter so that the US can spend over $50,000 per child and immigrant in a detention center or a jail cell or on welfare.

Why do we give money to countries that don’t spend it on The People?

Unfortunately, Israel is not that much better:

Israel is the largest recipient of US aid – $3.77 billion annually. 

Secular Jews in Israel make up 40-50% of the population.

Muslims make up 20% of the population.

20% of the population identify as Orthodox Jews.

Most PM’s in Israel’s past identified as ‘secular.

Most, if not not nearly all, of Hollywood’s Jewish population identify as – secular.

George Soros is quite definitively – Secular.

So tell me, why do we give them money? To counter the potential Muslim advances that could initiate from the Middle East, the same Middle East with which we trade trillions in weapons that could be used to decimate – Israel.

Okay, so now I understand. We are giving Israel money to buy weapons from us, so that they can arm them to fight against the countries in the Middle East whom we have armed and pose the greatest threat to WWIII, although they are a predominantly secular country that is comprised of ‘ethnic Jews’ and Muslims. Perhaps the point is to give a country Aid so that they put it in a US or UK bank that can subsequently be confiscated once we declare that country a threat and a coup is required so as to sanction the funds deposited.

But we don’t have a problem with The Swamp…

Israel Bombs Syria – IAEC Cries FOUL!

The International Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) is crying foul for the Israeli attack on Syria yesterday.  As an ‘independent’ agency tasked with defining, and monitoring nuclear activity, it is their assertion that they should have been privy to the documents that Netanyahu is using as evidence to support the Israeli bombing.

Okay.   But who/what is The International Atomic Energy Commission?  

They were initially created in 1957 to act independently of the UN, except that they report directly to the General Assembly of the UN…  Oops.

In 2005, their former Director General, whose four year terms began in 1997,  extended 2001 and 2005, Mohamed ElBaradei, and the IAEC were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.   It was his inspection in Iraq that preceded the invasion for Chemicals of Mass Destruction.   He later was quoted as claiming that inspections should take more time after it was deemed that they in essence were never discovered to exist – and his assessment was flawed.  Sorry Iraq.   ElBaradei was instrumental in the 2011 Revolution which ousted Egypt’s Mubarek, as well as the 2013 coup again in Egypt.  He belongs to the Constitution Party which he founded in 2012 and advocates “Revolution” – within “Liberal” ideals…

In fact, all the founding members of the Constitution Party consider themselves Revolutionaries.   Not sure exactly how the Nobel Peace Prize governors determine what defines “peace”?

Nobel Peace Prize?

He has also been quoted as saying that Israel poses the biggest threat to the Middle East!  In other words, this man of peace who was ‘neutral’ and awarded the Nobel Prize For Peace, has in fact been a demonstrative anarchist with an agenda against Iraq, Iran and Israel…calling for war, destruction, annihilation and anarchy.   Huh.

The current Director General, Yukya Amano, belongs to the Liberal Party and previously worked as a civil servant for the UN.    He was Chairman of the IAEC at the time it was awarded the joint 2005 Nobel Peace Prize, although it is oddly unclear what Peace they achieved?

Apparently, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to these joint efforts for their efforts to “deter nuclear energy from being used for military purposes”.   Unfortunately, it is unclear exactly what they accomplished as this is not stated in any descriptive format and is prelude to their anarchist revolutionary coups…

So what we have is a UN Agency, that is actually ‘NOT” a UN Agency, which is tauted as being “Independent”, but is headed by Liberal Revolutionaries who have participated in violent coups, as being the ‘go to’ agency to make first determinations whether the documents Netanyahu espouses, are in fact, authentic?

Because, they are the UN?  And in dire need to prove they are worthy of their Budget?

Like all UN Agencies, the IAEC has expanded it’s trough into Climate Change, ecosystems, women in positions of power, nuclear workforce capability, medical imaging, cancer, and a host of efforts to justify their $500 million per year budget which grossly failed Chernobyl and Fukushima.

What have they accomplished?   Not really anything.

What their website does lack is any discussion about Iran and the Iranian deal instituted by Obama and supported by Merkel and Macron.   In fact, their latest report, March 2018, states that Iran is in full compliance.   In fact, Director General Amano released a press report stating that:   “As of today, I can state that Iran is implementing its nuclear-related commitments,” he said in his introductory statement to the Board. “The JCPOA represents a significant gain for verification. It is essential that Iran continues to fully implement those commitments. If the JCPOA were to fail, it would be a great loss for nuclear verification and for multilateralism.”

Oops.

Obviously, given Netanyahu’s document evidence, the IAEC has absolutely no idea what is going on, and as another UN Agency is completely and utterly inept merely voicing/reading a prepared statement that justifies their existence.

Who to trust?

This topsy-turvydom of information is rife with misinformation, delusion, fakery, corruption, propaganda, and manipulation.   Do you believe Bibi?   The UN AIEC?   Assad?  Iran?

Of course, this is the point of it all – to defraud the populace and make truth so confusing as to obliterate logic and delude us into a fantasy or illusion wherein the magician presents – a slight of hand…

Syria Sarin Chemical Came From Belgium?

Germany and Israel are tauting a new source for their intelligence gathering, Syrian Archive founded by a two man team consisting of: Hadi al-Khatib and Jeff Deutch. Other members include:  Abdul Rahman Jaloud, Niko Para, Haneen and Tariff (both of whom appear to have no last name), and Sam Razzouk.  According to DW.com, the German newspaper owned by the government and edited by Soros, this group is completely unbiased in their reporting of Syria Human Rights violations. 

The governments of Israel and Germany are utilizing the research and conclusions of Syrian Archive in conjunction with the one man show – Bellingcat, to make legal intelligence decisions, including the determination that Assad used chemical weapons on his people in Douma.

Hadi Al Khatib is also a Director for the Center For Internet and Human Rights, whose goal is to provide a platform for the promotion of high quality research about internet and human rights.   The internet has ‘rights’?   The internet is not a person…  

Court action against three separate chemical companies is pending given the evidence provided by these two research companies who claim that chemicals were sold to Assad between 2014 and 2016 despite the ban in place.

AE Chemie and Danmar Logistics are among those cited.  AE Chemie produces personal care and cosmetic products.   Danmar Logistics is a transport company.   The chemical in contention is isoproponal,more commonly known as ‘rubbing alcohol’, which is typically used as an antiseptic and cleaning agent.   It is also used in personal care and cosmetic products.  And apparently is one potential ingredient in the making of Sarin.

The two companies being charged are Belgium and claim they are innocent because customs accepted the shipment with all proper declarations.

It is worth noting that the Executives of the Center For Internet and Human Rights includes Dr. Ben Wagner who previously worked for the Soros funded, Human Rights Watch, and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.  Other researchers and Directors claim in their bios to have worked for ‘international NGO’s’, unnamed.

Sam Razzouk of Syrian Archive formerly worked for International Medical Corps which is a member of the Clinton Global Initiative.

Their Twitter account reveals a very biased and edged analysis with associations such as Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch, and Bellingcat.  While the 2 companies charged never assert they were supplying the chemical to Assad, they claim that they had contracts with paint companies and leather factories in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan for 15 to 20 years.   Leather tanneries are a major industry in the Middle East.

In the Middle East, leather tanneries typically use cow urine and pigeon poop in the processing of the leather which is all done manually, i.e. using hands and feet to soften the hides.   Rubbing alcohol is used to disinfect the leather given the stench and clean the host area.

So, while the claims against these companies may be real in that they continued to transport rubbing alcohol to these three Middle Eastern countries, whether or not Assad took the shipments is indeterminable given he was never the contractual party.   Any assertions against him are completely contrived, biased, and without a Protocol of Truth – a conjecture making the entire allegation relatively worthless and most definitely with an – Agenda

Syria: The Bombs Bid The Cabal A’dieu

The Syria Missile strike was a necessary evil in order to deter a greater evil from doing greater harm.  

Trump targeted chemical installations exclusively.   Whether they were Assads or the rebels doesn’t really matter any longer because they no longer exist and proving one or the other will further no additional retaliation.   It is done, and now Trump can pull out of Syria as per his initial plan before this cockeyed illusion.

The Elites, the Cabal, that wanted to provoke WWIII were out gamed.   ISIS is eliminated.   The chemical stash and manufacturing is – eliminated.   No coup.   And Assad can now prevail so as to rebuild what was destroyed.   Syrians can go home.   And the impending crisis that was staged, has had its final curtain call.

Trump’s “Goals”, as the New York Times would have us question, include moving away from coups, leaving Syria and Afghanistan, and divesting the Swamp so that a New America can replace the New World Order.  But apparently, their narrow minded attitude fails to acknowledge anything positive and reverts back to laud the failure of Obama to conclude anything in Syria for eight tediously long, criminally inexcusable years.

Refocusing on Hillarygate – building the wall – and healthcare reform can continue.

While some pundits will still whine “it wasn’t enough’, they are the ones that can now be easily viewed as aligned with The Cabal.   Opinions on the Liberal biased MSM are already trying to find fault, psycho analyzing every move as though they have any clue what is going on behind the stage.  In fact, few know, and that is for our own protection.   But the goal remains – the Swamp must be paved over.

There is one thing that Syria, the US and Russia have in common – a deep desire to bring down the New World Order, the Cabal, the cartel.   Each of our World Wars was promulgated by the Cabal.  Each War produced for them ravaging profits.   Motivated by nothing but greed, they are far from dead, but their agenda has been upended… for now.

Since Syria is now taken out of the picture, it is inevitable that they will choose another play to act out.   The distractions will continue, but Trump is resolute in his agenda to give the US back to the people.   We need to trust this.

Hacking Airlines and Military Aircraft?

There have been a spate of military helicopter and aircraft crashes of late, including jets and transports, that defy coincidence. While it isn’t a new occurrence, it seems to be targeted, and it seems that the possibility exists that our military hardware can be hacked – to crash – by anyone with the app.  In 2013, German security expert and commercial pilot, Hugo Teso, claimed to have created just such an app that can gain access to a plane’s computer and change its destination, or simply crash it.

So far this year alone there have been 18 targeted military crashes involving;  Australia AirForce, China’s People Liberation Army, Russia, Turkey, US, Myanmar, India and South Korea.  Officially, the various militaries do not release details on the causal factors, and the media speculates on nominal ideas such as mechanical failure… weather, etc.

But what if, these crashes are all part of a bigger, more intense tit-for-tat military war?

In 2017, there were sixteen crashes.  In 2016, there were fifty three, 12 of those involved the US military!   In 2015, there were 33, 13 were US.  Many others were NATO training exercises – some involving a crash at takeoff.   The pilots are seasoned.  Military pilots are the best trained in the world!  How do you crash at takeoff?  How do you fly into a mountain?  How do you disappear?  Unless you’ve lost control of the plane to someone else.

Helicopters collide? How?  Do they not see each other?  Or are they locked out of their controls?

A researcher with a cybersecurity firm, Chris Roberts, claimed he had hacked into the autopilot system of a plane, a United flight, and caused one of the engines to climb resulting in a lateral movement.   He claims he was able to do this 15-20 times between 2011 and 2014.   The FBI investigated.   Either the FBI clandestinely decided Roberts was better on their payroll, or they hired their own gun slingers.  Doing nothing is a naïve conclusion.   Roberts also claimed that he hacked into a space station and changed the temperature…

Did the Chinese space station really just arbitrarily fall out of space and burn in before crashing into earth?   Or was it hacked?  

Did the Algerian military plane with 257 soldiers simply crash after takeoff, or was it hacked? 

Algeria’s main friends include Russia, South Africa, Nigeria and Egypt.   Therefore, it is logical to assume that the enemies of Russia would target Algeria.

Is an alternate war already in progress, a tit-for-tat, with world militaries remotely downing jets, space stations, satellites, planes, and helicopters?

What really could have happened to Malaysian Flight #370 that simply disappeared  in March 2014?   Why would Malaysia be targeted ie, both Flight #370 and the downed Flight #17 over Ukraine – within a few months of each other?   Malaysia and China have a miffy dispute over the Spratly Islands due to their rich fishing grounds and significant reserves containing both oil and natural gas.   Perhaps China felt a ‘warning’ was necessary in order to bring Malaysia in line.

Weather manipulation was considered a means of warring with the enemy wreaking huge financial losses. 2017 was considered the most expensive in history raking in damages of $306 billion.   Are we in the midst of a war whereby weather and cyber have already become the methodology and the government is too fearful to say?

The idea that this one man was capable of accomplishing space station and airline hacks would indicate he is most likely not alone and that hacking has been happening for perhaps a decade – or more.   Homeland, Intelligence, governments would rather not discuss this too elaborately for fear that the ensuing chaos would devastate the airline industry.  To be sure, at this stage it would appear most hacks target military transports as though a bizarre ‘code of ethics’ is agreed upon.

But given the Elite Order needs chaos in order to make themselves ‘known’ as the savior, I imagine this information will be forthcoming.  The date is secured by the calendar that the Elite follow, all is Ordered, all is in good time.

In the meantime, it would appear that military aircraft and personnel are not a part of that ‘code of ethics’ and are considered prime casualties.  You kill one of mine, I kill ten of yours…   Whether the hack is from a manipulated component manufactured by China, or a component installed later, the reality of this technology means we are already in WWIII.

Banking Cartel Vying for WWIII: Follow The Money…

The shadow hawks within Israel are bombing Syria and calling for the US to enter into war with them against Iran and Russia.  War creates pockets of millionaires and billionaires.  It is a vehicle by which a vast chasm of wealth is deposited among the elite and despotism and bankruptcy among the middle class.  It is population control.   It has absolutely nothing to do with people or humanity and everything to do with Follow The Money.  Right now, the elite desperately need to create large hovels of cash in order to usher in what Hillary surely would have already – WAR.

Jacob Schiff was an Ashkenazi Jewish American banker born in Frankfurt, Germany whose father was a broker for the Rothschild’s.  He promoted secularism, and could be said to be one of the great grandfathers of the NWO.  In 1874, he went to work as a broker for Kuhn, Loeb and Co which ultimately morphed into Shearson Lehman in 1984.   While at Loeb, Schiff extended loans to the Empire of Japan, Takahashi Korekiya in order to help finance the defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese War.   Japan won the war, and attributed this power as proof that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion first published in 1897 and subsequently in 1906, gave evidence that Jewish supremacy was quite real.

Schiff was a tremendous supporter of the Central Powers during WWI, ie The Ottoman Empire and Germany.  In addition, he financially backed the Bolshevik Revolution that inspired the Marxist powers of Lenin and ultimately Stalin to rule Russia.   Schiff went on to become the Director at National City Bank, which evolved into Citibank, Equitable Life Assurance Society which evolved into AXA Equitable, Wells Fargo, and Union Pacific Railroad.  He was the founder of Continental Bank and Trust which ultimately became – JP Morgan Chase.

This tight knit banking cartel has been in existence for over a hundred years, growing, morphing, and gaining power toward one unified end.

Schiff is said to have been a powerful ‘motivator’ in advising Woodrow Wilson to create the Federal Reserve Act,  and The Federal Trade Commission Act, so as to create a bubble of wealth with the entry of the US into WWI.  He utilized his ‘friendship’/bribery to ultimately advise Wilson when it was time to enter the War at the behest of Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Myers, Guggenheims, Warburgs (Schiffs brother-in-law was Paul Warburg who served on the Board of the Federal Reserve), Baruchs, and Loebs (he was married to Loeb’s daughter Frieda).

Woodrow Wilson is quoted as saying:

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.

They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

Wilson was a puppet, a pawn.

The Rockefellers are said to have made $200 million from WWI.   The newly created ‘privately owned’ Federal Reserve financed $3 billion in loans and $6 billion in exports – not for free.  It is believed that 21,000 millionaires and billionaires were created as a result of the War.   It also created 41 million casualties.

WWII was no different. In 1939, before Britain and France joined in the war, their governments chose JP Morgan to sell $1.5 billion of securities on public markets.  The Swiss Banking cartel was actually created as a result of dormant accounts they held after WWII.   Using and investing the funds for sixty years without any remuneration or attempted remuneration, in 1997, they published a list of the original account holder names, 2000.  The amount held varies depending on the reporting method adopted;  from $43 million to $7 billion.

Today we have the Rothschild/Rockefeller/Soros cabal announcing crypto investing, demanding confiscation of private weapons, creating a monopoly of agriculture assets, and fueling WWIII.   Obviously these actions are not to the benefit of any people outside of the elite.  And yet, they have the power to cause us to enter these wars for their personal monetary interests.

Why is Syria such a target to the bankers?   Syria’s Central Bank was state controlled, and therefore not submissive to the Federal Reserve or the BIS.   They had no debt with the IMF which is paramount in bringing massive inequality of wealth.  They had banned GMO.   Like Russia they were heavily against Soros and the New World Order.   Taking out the countries opposed to a NWO one at a time had to take place;  US – internal chaos, Ukraine – a coup, Syria – annihilation, Russia – economic sanctions and demonizing, and Iran – a war with Israel.

So why is Trump suddenly giving the banking elite their way in fueling war with Syria, Iran and Russia?

Why is he ignoring evidence with regard to Skripal?   The faked chemical attacks?  Why is Israel involved in Syria bombing at all?

Is Trump caving?

CHINA Trade War – Unraveled

Communist China – is telling the EU to come together and work against the US in the trade war that is rapidly escalating…   Germany now wants to be acting mediator to resolve the conflict on behalf of China and the US.   And while Germany appears to agree that China has had an unfair advantage for years – and everyone was afraid to do anything – they still negotiate from a position of fear, instead of rationale.  Which is why we are in this situation to begin with.

It’s like playing Chess without a Queen or King…  what’s the point?

The deficit trade with China has been ignored for decades and now we have a President willing to narrow that gap, but the EU is still curled up in a ball of fear and ‘what ifs’.

It is a bizarre mentality that is willing to continually erode trade out of fear of retaliation when the continued spiral will only grow steadily until China is the wealthiest country – and global control has been attained.  It is the race between the ‘tortoise and the hare’.   In the end, if the EU was a bit more observant they might see that a positive result could occur wherein trade between the US and the EU could heighten leaving China on the outside…   In other words, trade would simply ‘shift’.

The US is not alone in its trade deficit with China.  The EU deficit is also a significant number hitting over $175 billion in 2016 comprised mostly of ‘industrial products including machinery, transport and appliances.  Exports have tripled since 2006 rising from roughly 60 billion to 160 billion, while imports have risen from about 195 billion to 350 billion.   Trade with the US is considerably more with the US exporting valued at $501 billion and imports at $592 billion.  The EU thus has a surplus with the US of roughly $92 billion.

Seems a rather logical conclusion that trade with the US is much more valuable than China.  Trade with the US could grow to cover any deficiencies with China, and everyone would be happy… except China.

While the US and China trade with the EU are overall relatively neck-and-neck, the US provides a surplus.  The question remains, do you, the EU, support a Communist state or a Democratic state?

China is the largest export economy in the world generating a $736 billion surplus.   Its main exports include:  computers, broadcasting equipment, telephones, circuits and light fixtures.   Top imports are:  circuits, oil, gold and iron ore.   The US is its largest export partner and Hong Kong is its largest import partner.

From a purely business standpoint, the numbers put China on the defensive.

The argument is the fact that China holds the key in their ownership of US Treasuries which currently stands at roughly 7% of total US debt.   What is not so widely discussed is the fact that during the Obama administration, China quietly divested 97% of its US holdings.  Of the $14,34 trillion of US government debt, $4,64 trillion was intragovernmental, meaning that the government borrows from one pocket to give to another pocket. Sort of the classic Ponzi Scheme we put people in jail for.

A shell game of ‘guess where the money  is’ is how the government has routinely claimed that Social Security is funded – albeit by ‘debt’.  Debt for which there is no return because we continue to operate at a deficit in trade and spending!

Because that’s the game of how to destroy the US and gain global power.

So what Trump is doing is trying to unravel that absolute destructive mess decades of corrupt Presidents have created at the behest of the global elite.   And it won’t be fun, and it won’t be pretty, and sometimes it will hurt, but from an economic standpoint it is the ONLY solution.