Source: Macron – Groomed by Soros
In Venezuela, the opposition is being portrayed as the victim, poor people, starving people, people subjected to…
Source: Macron – Groomed by Soros
This is funny!
A ‘think tank’ controlled by a ‘Russian Official”, appointed by Putin, hatched a plan to increase Trump’s chances of winning the Presidential election. This information was given to Reuters by ‘Three Current and Four Past Unnamed Officials’ .
And how did this mind manipulation, interventionionist, master-minded intelligentsia come to fruition?
The plot involved having a ‘news outlet’ say that the smart choice for a President would be to have someone softer on Russia. … WOW! Now that is definitely a very toxic plot – how dare a media outlet make such an insidious flaming propaganda statement that would not be in line with Hillary! Must be a very very sinister PLOT.
But then, according to these ‘unnamed officials’, the plot wasn’t working and Hillary was gaining a lead so they had to hatch a new plot in October, just weeks before the election. So all the brightest of the brightest intelligentsia got together and decided – to sway the news to include the possibility of voter fraud, and Clinton’s gnarly ‘reputation’. How dastardly! No one would have ever considered doing such a thing in the mainstream media, especially given they were told exactly what to write!
Oh my! How perverse, how spectacular, imagine the IQ that went into such an aberrant manipulation of our voting mechanism that involved the media and alternate news…? How dare they!
Of course, according to theses shadowy unnamed officials, the media that the Kremlin employed was their own, “RT”, which doesn’t air on any channels in the US, is not well known in the US, and does not exactly have a massive US audience. But those details don’t matter. Instead, the master-minds of intelligentsia have their ruffles unfurled at the very notion that a foreign media would not be producing the information that they dictate!
How dare they!
So this is the extent of ‘evidentiary matter’ that has created such a colossal uproar throughout Washington and thus completely eradicated any possibility of simply ‘getting along’ with Russia and working together economically.
How much time has our esteemed Congress spent on analyzing the data? Reading and re-reading the headlines over and over again, trying to find some embedded code, something more viable, something sinister that could give credence to initiating WWIII, something worthy – to no avail.
What a waste of time and energy. This is why The Mainstream People, the MSP’s, are so colossally done with the government, the Swamp, and the Media. Of course, it is a given that the unnamed officials just might include such notable names as McCain, Lynch, Holder, Clinton, Carter, and Pelosi…
So, can we move on now and have Congress actually do something that benefits our country? I mean, we are paying their salaries, their pensions, their healthcare, their dental, their vacation pay, their holiday pay, their travel, their meals, their entertainment, their limousines, their private jets, their suits and ties and dresses and cologne. Shouldn’t they actually do something to earn their keep?
Professor Caroline Heldman was on Tucker Carlson advocating for much higher tax rates on the 1%ers, claiming that Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations were examples of what it meant to ‘pay their fair share’.
Eisenhower: In 1954 the adjusted gross income of all tax returns amounted to about $229 billion, with a total tax liability of about $26.7 billion or roughly 9% tax revenue on all income.
In 2015, the IRS raked in $3.25 Trillion in tax revenue, of that $1.54 Trillion was individual income tax. Total payroll in 2015 was roughly $16 Trillion. That equates to roughly 9% tax on revenue. The same as during the Eisenhower administration.
So what is a fair share?
What is the current distribution of tax revenue? The top 1% of all income earners paid 45.7% of all federal income taxes, but earned 17.1% of all income in the U.S. The top 20% paid 83.9% of all federal income taxes, after earning 51.9% of all income in America. The middle 20% of income earners paid 5.9% of all federal income taxes, but earned 14.8% of all income.
During Eisenhower, the top tier tax rate applied to those making $400,000 which converts to about $3.622 million in today’s dollars. The problem is the fair sharers are using $390,000 as the 1% measure. That would equate to about $38,000 in 1950 which was taxed at roughly 48%.
But even this isn’t a fair measure because it doesn’t account for all the revenue that is diverted out of the US in order to avoid/evade tax. Income concentration today is roughly the same as it was post The Great Depression in the 1920’s when most of the wealth was held by the top tier elites. Taxing them to death is not going to create a ‘redistribution’ of wealth, it only means they will ‘evade’ further through tax havens.
Taxing the wealthy is rather simplistic. It doesn’t solve income disparity, it merely means the government is potentially wealthier, thus expanding their already burgeoning expenditures and welfare. In addition, Mz. Heldman failed to note the economic, political, and social courses of the Eisenhower administration.
His cabinet was dubbed ‘eight millionaires and a plumber’. His policies were geared toward the annihilation of communism, securing Iranian oil, threatening China, demanding Russia agree to a reduction of nuclear arms, massive infrastructure spending, fighting the far right GOP good ole boys, promoting technology development, thawing the Cold War, balancing the budget, and putting America First.
He wasn’t the best, made blunders, and had failures, but he had successes too.
That being said, Mz. Heldman’s view is certainly not of the caliber of someone whose education includes a PhD given it was driven without any statistics, proven analysis, or in-depth thinking and deserved the response she got from Carlson – a laugh.
Interestingly, Mz. Heldman has a number of bio’s that offer different accomplishments including co-founder of New Orleans Women’s Shelter, co-founder of critical Response, leadership position with Common Ground, co-founded End Rape on Campus, and more. Oddly; None of these organizations mention her by name as having anything to do with their leadership or founding…?
Her bio also states she wrote a book; The War On Women’s Bodies in 2016 – but oddly it doesn’t come up in any Google search?
Her Occidental bio also states she ‘co-authored’ the book, Rethinking Madame President, when in fact she ‘co-edited’ the book. Oops. It’s important to truthful.
With baited breath the France election is descending quickly. Media outlets are earnestly promoting a Russian intervention in the process so as to declare the results invalid should Marine le Pen win. Macron is the groomed favorite created by Soros. Facebook complied with the Soros agenda and shut down over 30,000 accounts deemed ‘invalid or inappropriate’ by Soros standards so as to deflate the Le Pen avalanche. Somehow – that isn’t considered to be “Election Meddling”, instead it is called… Democratic Intervention.
Election meddling has been going on for at least 70 years and its perpetrators have predominantly included the US, secondarily Russia, and thirdly China. As such the meddling denouncement loses its clout when Chicken Little screams – Fowl…
The first notable meddling came in 1948 when the CIA worked to overthrow the Communist government in Italy. Emboldened by their success, the practice became somewhat commonplace. Sometimes it is subtle, and sometimes it has taken the form of assassinations, coups, and brutal civil wars – The Congo, Ukraine, Guatemala, and Indonesia, were particularly brutal resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Less brutal regime changes have been employed in Iran, Chile, Czechoslovakia, Nicaragua and even Israel.
Internally, voter fraud has surfaced in the US prompting investigations that reveal outright manipulation, trashing of ballots, faked ballots, illegal voters, and bussing of the elderly to vote twice and thrice.
As a cruel joke, the OSCE was established to oversee the election processes (in addition to their status as another global police) throughout the world and cry – Fowl if they felt something had gone – afoul. Unfortunately, it would come to light that their nonpartisan – nonpolitical face was actually quite biased and eyebrows were raised. They are funded by 57 member states, and just love to fund their chosen party in elections around the world.
Revenues for 2015 totaled about $242 million Euros of which roughly 70% was allocated to employees and contractors salaries. A rather bloated agency that has no success in anything except gulping tax dollars.
Another monitoring organization is the National Democratic Institute, which is affiliated with the Democratic Party, the Socialist International and Liberal International. Not exactly non-partisan… It is a Socialist agenda funded by US tax dollars through the State Department and USAID.
There is the OAS, Organization of American States, which promotes globalization and works to fight human rights violations, promoting peace, fighting drugs and sustainable development in South America. I’d say – it wasn’t working too well: drug trade is now the most sustainable development and human rights are in the twalette.
There is the Council on Europe, another 1948 creation that has attained laugh status for it’s tenure in doing not much of anything albeit spending money. Headed by Thorbjorn, former PM of Norway, he had the dubious honor of electing Obama as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for his ‘promotion of dialogue in the Muslim world, and his reinstatement of START agreements with Russia’ which were actually in effect since the 1980’s and simply up for renewal. He served as Vice President for Socialist International – the same affiliate of Madeleine Albright’s, National Democratic Institute.
No coincidence there.
Bottom line, it would appear that all the election overseers for Europe, the US, and South America are aligned with the Democrat Party of the US and Labour Party or Socialist Party of the EU. Seems somewhat of a coup; Mastermind Meddling Manipulation
So we now have The New York Times, CNN, NY Daily News, USA Today, Yahoo, Reuters, The Guardian, and the now infamous Soros portal – Deutsche Weld, all pointing to Russia for meddling in the upcoming French elections. Gee, Chicken Little – fear mongering, hysterical chaotic garbage mind manipulation is so passé.
Take a cue: The fable teaches the necessity for deductive reasoning and subsequent investigation.
This whole tax return fiasco is rather mundane and would be considered a yawn except that Hollywooders feel obligated to contribute, fund and voice their witty opinions with regard to Trump’s tax returns.
I don’t know, why don’t we just demand that every Hollywood elitist making over a million release their tax returns, and offshore account status? Maybe we should require all tax haven countries to release said data? Because, we’re paying their salaries, so we should have a right to know all their private data – right?
There is NO law that mandates any presidential candidate release their tax return. And it is a fairly nouveau concept that was initiated by of all people – Nixon, but it wasn’t voluntary, it came about as a result of the Watergate debacle as well as Agnew’s mess of bribery and fraud.
Reagan released one year and claimed it was an invasion of privacy. Gerald Ford didn’t release anything. And Bush and Cheney released partial pieces and synopses, although Bush’s showed heavy charitable contributions – upwards of 62%. The Clinton’s were vague, given they had numerous safe havens, the tax returns were not investigated.
However, what has been consistent with the Obama’s and Clinton’s is the vast wealth accumulated just prior, during and after their elections that eludes to the possibility of hidden or havened or manipulated reports of true income and assets. Lest we forget the bemoaning of Hillarygate as she claimed they were broke leaving the White House only to magically buy multi-million dollar properties and lavish in the bourgoise comfort of a sudden massive accumulation of wealth. Of course, we now know much was at the sweet bequest of the Saudi regime.
The major difference is that Trump is coming into the White House with massive wealth and thus his greed factor is considerably less motivated – for him, it is all about ‘legacy’. Not the monetary legacy that is so prevalent among the mindset of Liberals, but the legacy of change and actually making things ‘better’. The historical legacy. And in that – privacy.
Hollywood should take note and comply with the law. If they want to change the law, then we can discuss that option, but at this point they are whistling Dixie. As I recall, Obama was asked to release his transcripts from college, which he adamantly refused to do despite the consensus that he had falsified his admissions, his source of ‘scholarship funding’, and his prowess as a student.
Alas, the Debra’s of the world don’t seem to think that is important. It is important to acknowledge that after Mz. Debra’s fame in the Will and Grace series, she has been ordained within a number of failed campaigns before her current role of sitting on the sidelines.
Bottom line, Messing is allowed her ‘opinion’, but so is everyone else that may or may not agree with her. The difference is that conservatives don’t tend to claim their opinion is the only one – and everyone else is an idiot or deplorable or uneducated or just stupid per the er, Amy Schumer intellectuals.
So while the whole tax return issue is interesting, privacy does prevail. Still, it would be interesting if we had access to all of the Hollywooder’s tax returns so that we could know if they are paying their fair share while we support their livelihood…and if they actually support charity to any extent, and if they are hiding income in offshore accounts because well, they don’t want to actually ‘pay taxes’ they just want to talk about – everyone else.
The UN believes that migration ‘slows the aging process’. But it’s not a fountain of youth, it’s a bizarre demographic concept that only the UN could create.
Because two thirds of the global population over 60 reside in under-developed countries, the UN believes that migrating the younger generation to developed countries will slow the aging process… Of course, they admit that ultimately these young migrants will age to being over 60.
Who writes this stuff?
In the meantime, the UN states that these young migrants will buy houses, buy cars, contribute to capitalism and consumerism, and be a great lift to the developed world’s societies. Per Dr. Phil – “How’s that workin’ out for ya?” Because right now about 95% or more of immigrants in the EU and US are on welfare which simply drains society.
In addition, what happens to the countries that have lost their youth and now are supposed to survive with only their aged? With no one to support them and with the loss of manpower, wages, and welfare contributors, those countries populations will simply die and leave a vast vacant country.
What the UN proposes is so immature in their evaluation one wonders the intellectual capacity of these members. Undeterred, in 1982, the UN prepared a ’62 point ‘Vienna International Plan of Action on Aging’. In 1991 they drafted 18 Entitlements for older people and in 1999 they created International Old People’s Day. And the Piece de Resistance, in 2002 they held a conference in Madrid where they created a new and improved resolution in which the well-being of older people was ‘recommended’.
I wonder how much this is costing… all these plans and conferences and recommendations?
I looked up the 4 day excursion/conference in Madrid and found that the UN didn’t do much of anything in 2002 so maybe that explains their obsession with aging. Over the course of a year they held five conferences. By contrast, in 2005 they jetted about for 28 conferences to New York, Geneva, Paris, Thailand, Japan, Germany, Hong Kong, and the Grenadines where they discussed ‘decolonization’. Grenada is a Commonwealth of Queen Elizabeth II.
By 2006, the UN was holding 52 conferences having elevated their significance and authority to such ideologies as world tourism, human rights, migration, climate control, regulating the internet, disarmament and so on.
Suffice it to say, the UN has grown into a global governance of everything without ever asking The People if they want this international police system. Under Ban Ki Moon, the number of high ranking officials increased by 47% in New York and 27% elsewhere. The Secretary-General is the chief administrative officer of the United Nations. Although the Secretary-General is “appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the Security Council,” Article 101 of the U.N. Charter grants him authority to appoint U.N. staff
In other words, it’s a good ole boys club that has no transparency, a huge budget paid for by member states (US picks up about 25% of the tab), and acts as the world’s Globalist Government without any People ever voting for ‘anyone’. They are not required to reveal salaries and travel expenses, and pensions like normal bodies of government, they operate without any accountability, and we’ve been duped into accepting this massive power without even a peep…
When something smells ‘fishy’ it is usually because it stinks!
In 2009, Soros gave an interview in which he claimed that in order to have a New World Order, the only way to bring China into it would be to put them at the helm. Or at least, have them think they were at the helm. Because China is only opposed if they are not the Holy Grail.
In 2016, Putin kicked out the Rothschild cabal from ever entering Russia again. Soros already had a Russian bounty on his head, but with the unmasking and proverbial boot given the Rothschild’s, Russia became a lost cause, albeit a source of vilification.
One of Soros major concerns in instituting the New World Order, was a Russia – China alliance that could disembowel the entire writings of the New World Order according to Garp. Dismantling that relationship could potentially take one of two forms; 1) vilify Russia to the point that a China relationship will hurt China’s economy, or 2) create a new relationship with China to lure it away from one with Russia.
With the election turning topsy-turvy on the Soros Cabal, vilifying and denigrating Trump wasn’t having the effect that they wanted. Trump’s anti-China and Pro-Russia stance had the ability to completely destroy decades upon decades of hard work. And then – suddenly We The People witness a dramatic change, a different Trump, and a flipped rhetoric.
Suddenly, despite Trump’s previous adamant campaign proclamations, not only is China now our good buddy and Russia the arch villain, but the banking cabal of the Rothschild’s is upheld with Yellen remaining at the helm of the Federal Reserve. OUCH!
Something happened. Either Trump has been blackmailed – or he has been threatened. The New World Order has a way of finding the leverage it needs to accomplish it’s task whether it be simple assassination, or the gifting of a person’s ‘dreams’. But coercion is an absolute.
For McCain that dream would appear to be a beautiful wealthy wife who would never divorce him no matter ‘what’ he might do. He is assured of the doting young thing and surrounded by wealth.
For Obama it was fame! He lavishes the limelight – book publications, Hollywood, television, center-stage these are his dreams – not his father…
With the about face of Trump, and his sudden lacking normal intensity, I would hypothesize that his blackmail was more of a threat of harm than a gift of his ‘dream’. An Either – Or, scenario. The alligators came out of the Swamp.
It is worth noting that since that ‘Either-Or’ took effect, the media have been relatively silent, the frontpage bashing, the fifteen deplorable articles per page have been nearly eliminated and in some instances replaced with praises and pansies. The ogre portrayals have lightened and even the evening news is light on Trump and heavy on world affairs.
Even the photos of Trump reflect a change, no longer is he raising Hell, he appears more like he is ready to cry. ; as in he got – whooped. Politico, a quite Liberal outlet is claiming he is Clintonian. And praise is lavished on Kushner, the same Kushner who went over Bannon’s head and called for the missile strikes on Syria and for more implications of Russian complicity.
Backing NATO, backing Yellen, backing China, vilifying Russia, bombing Syria, harboring Comey, and silent on charges against Obama and Hillary over the ‘eavesdropping’, all bear witness to the defeat of glory at the hands of an undeniable, indefinable ‘threat’.
While it feels eerily like The Body Snatchers, in reality, blackmail and/or threats are more the Swamp modus aperendi. In the end – it does not bode well…
There is an epidemic in our country of false accusations. It is so prevalent that even attorneys are jumping on the band-wagon in defense of those falsely accused whether it is harassment, sexual assault or homicide. What makes this so devastating is that in many of these cases, the accusation isn’t simply a misunderstanding or an undefined law, it is instead a malicious, brazen attack that has the potential to absolutely eradicate a life.
In these cases, the life is the purported aggressor, and in fact the victim is the perpetrator. Knowingly, and with malice.
Little attention is given to the false claim when it is proven inaccurate, instead, the ‘victimhood’ has swung to a fierce pendulum – something like ‘feminism’. Everyone is convicted of their supposed crime before any evidence is provided. We see it on college campuses, middle schools, in communities, gyms, cliques, and even in our military.
But it starts in an infancy of agenda that allows it to metastasize.
When it happens in society, too often Chicken Little has no idea the enormity of the accusation, no clue that it can gain momentum and have devastating effects that even result in suicide. But ignorance is never a justification.
Recently, a college was provided with an accusation, and before any evidence was produced, they assumed they criminality and took immediate action. What this embraces is the antiquity of justice in which a person is considered guilty – until proven innocent. A complete trashing of our judicial system.
But nonetheless, we embrace it.
Where is it’s origins?
Communism supports the axiom that a person must prove their innocence. So when the US adopts this precept, we become closer and closer aligned with the Communist agenda. As the US unconsciously moved closer to Socialism and thus Communism by default, a variety of societal morays followed course.
Feminism in particular advocated for all men to be considered guilty immediately upon the accusation of sexual assault so as to embolden women to come forward when they were afraid. While rape in it’s truth is never condoned, false accusations for vengeance have become a spiraling atrocity that society has chosen to ignore. And as such, false claims of harassment and even homicide have become the nouveau bourgeoisie.
In an attempt to bow to the whims and wills of the feminists, the courts have spiraled into bully pulpits that sentence innocent 19 year old boys to life in prison. It is a far larger epidemic than we know, and the number of defense attorney’s entering the field are fully aware that this is far greater a disease than we can imagine.
It is an uphill battle to exonerate these ‘victims’ given that most cases are decided on he said – she said evidence, which shouldn’t be evidence at all except that the Communist Feminism Movement changed all that.
Unfortunately, when our own government and media adamantly support guilty claims the sway on The People is that this is normal – albeit the ‘new normal’. The ethical and moral implications are never considered, because revenge, vengeance, retaliation, is more important.
Today, when I hear people defending the Trump bombing of Syria, the justification is always, “Well, he had to show them who is boss” or ‘He had to show he was more powerful’, or “He puffed out his chest and now everyone knows he is for real”… Really? Is that what it takes? Because that’s who we call the bully in school, the abuser in a family, and the hawkish sloth in government.
That is not respectful, judicial, or Christian. How many died as a result?
In essence, the US has tossed aside it’s judicial humanity in favor of Communist or Sharia preference. And while waiting is never easy, no one ever said – law is easy – but they did say it was Just – as in, Innocent Until Proven Guilty.
I don’t support it in harassment, in sexual assault, in homicide – or in government. Because when we shelve our law – we embrace – Chaos.
The Syrian war is such a universal mess it is completely unfathomable why. The list of countries bombing Syria includes: US, UK, Germany, France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Qatar, Belgium, Bahrain, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Italy, Turkey, and UAE. And yet – with all that in play – ISIS, comprised of about 100,000 fighters by best guess, has actually – grown…
Five years later, a country is completely destroyed, but ISIS and al Qaeda seem to be doing just fine. What kind of military intelligence is conducting this massive catastrophe? In WWII, Hitler’s army was comprised of over 18 million. In the Gulf War against Iraq we fought against 650,000 troops and it lasted one month.
We have fake videos showing faked casualties, faked attacks, and apparently a complete inability to determine who is doing what where because we don’t seem to know who is bombing whom at any given time and so the rhetoric is US vs Assad.
Adding to the confusion, weapons are being sold indiscriminately to all related countries by both the US and Russia. It used to be that we could verify who was doing what via satellite imagery, but those too have been doctored to present false information. So we turned to witnesses on the ground. But they have no factual bearing either as each side presents their propaganda witness.
Recently the US press has begun a campaign of parading previous Syrian victims as their source of information. Hillary capitalized on this propaganda method during her campaign, and the media have recently jumped osn the proverbial bandwagon creating chemical weapon victims. One, used to work for the Clinton Global Initiative… and the other one claims to have escaped after the August 2013 chemical weapon attack, only to show up in the US in September 2013 and start a Twitter account in English…
It’s interesting to note who is retweeted on this Twitter account of Mr. Kassem Eid. It would include Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch, a George Soros organization. There is Liz Sly of the Washington Post. The Daily Beast who has on it’s board Chelsea Clinton. The Syrian Network For Human Rights, a UK based organization that was an offshoot of the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, both one man shows located in the UK. And the very shadowy Eliot Higgins or Bellingcat also from the UK , a stay at home dad married to a Turkish woman who suddenly rose to fame as a weapons analyst…
The information being parlayed is always the same, makes statements of fact without any corroborating evidence, and is continually restated, reTweeted, rehashed by the mainstream media. The idea being if you say it enough, if multiple sources say the same thing – then it must be factual and evidence is no longer necessary.
Now we have Fox News using the fact checker of The Washington Post against Rice, and the mire is so thick we cannot possibly know what is fact or fiction. It is no different than asking Hillary who’s on first in Benghazi! All it proves is that Rice is going down and she is the Democrat’s scapegoat.
We also now know that the riff between Bannon and Kushner was about Syria. Kushner won – and Syria was bombed without any verifiable evidence other than a statement made by the White Helmets, an organization created in and funded by the UK that ultimately shifted its funding to the US taxpayers. There are photos and videos linking them to complicity with al-Nusra. For their propaganda, they use the Aleppo Media Center to provide ‘pictures’ for release to US and UK media. The authenticity of these photos is questionable…at best. And certainly completely and openly biased.
Tillerson blaming Russia for their failure to eliminate the chemical weapons in Syria is childish. The OPCW, a Norwegian organization, was tasked with the elimination. They work in cooperation with the UN. It’s latest news brief has declared that they are ‘investigating the claim of chemical weapons use in Syria’. Below is what the OPCW stated in 2016 with regard to the continued use of chemical weapons:
“At a time when the likelihood of states using chemical weapons has become distant, non-state actors – in Syria and Iraq – have not only sought to acquire such weapons, but have also used them. What this means is that chemical terrorism is no longer a theoretical proposition or even imminent threat, but a stark reality. It is also a reality that could affect many more of us across the globe over coming years as foreign fighters return to their homelands with experiences gained in Syria and Iraq.”
There are six countries known to house stashes of chemical weapons: US, Russia, Egypt, Israel, North Korea and South Sudan. However, what the OPCW acknowledges is that ‘non-state actors’, as in terrorists, have stockpiles that cannot be contained. Recklessness was the Democrat and Republican war hawks agenda, The People are more concerned about the Saudi’s than Assad where Sharia Law, beheadings, human rights violations, war mongering in Yemen, ethnic cleansing, and genocide are all tolerated for some reason… could it be The Swamp back-scratching???
ASK the people – not the POLITICIANS. This is NOT what we want! This will undermine everything and cater to the Soros agenda. Chaos! He is – smiling.
I truly can not believe the stupidity of analysts that want to start a war with Assad. What the heck will that accomplish? Bombing would hit even more civilians, possibly US troops that we don’t want anyone to know are there, and ‘moderate rebels’ that we claim to support. Not to mention the casual Russians… How will that go down in international relations? This is such a McCain/Democrat/Soros laughable fraud, I can’t believe we would even consider such a farse.
The argument on the ‘right’ is that Trump will ‘appear weak if he doesn’t order a war/attack’. Which implies we are willing to go to war based on ‘saving face’???
This of course could also lead to even greater Russia animosity, Iran animosity and the entire caliphate agenda of the Middle East. If we become integral, we are ushering in WWIII. And that is simply not acceptable.
Where is the evidence? Our President demands evidence for our local and national conspiracies, and yet is NOT asking for evidence that Assad is the culprit based on such media citations as ‘Assad dropped chemical bombs on civilians’. This is the same President who has declared the media is incompetent and faked.
C’mon Trump! Are you willing to put America into a war based on media hype? Because – you will be impeached – by the same people that put you in office!
You are being led into the same cull that made Bush rake us into a horrific war in Iraq which systematically was the catalyst for the devastation of entire countries and mass exodus of refugees and displaced immigrants. Not to mention – deaths, veterans, physical causalities, and the demise of our compassion.
Only a Dictator can keep Muslims in line.
That is a proven fact.
Trump is falling into the exact same sullied pit that took down Bush and ultimately made him a pawn of Soros.
When the ‘sides’ are so bizarrely collaborative, this is a strategy that we have never fought before. We knew that Nazi’s were Nazi’s’. They didn’t mask themselves as something else. We knew who the Jewish people were. This is different and can not be addressed from the same military strategy as has been deployed in past wars.
A war with Assad will only create an even greater game for ISIS and al-Qaeda. They will expand, they will begin to infiltrate Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Germany as is their quest. It is to conquer what was the Ottoman Empire under the Sunni, Saudi, caliphate.
The Sunni caliphate that embraces Sharia Law, mass beheadings, lashing of women, multiple wives, religious intolerance and every freedom that we take for granted. We are fighting – on the wrong side! And The Swamp is leading the battle cry!
Damn it Trump! Don’t fall prey and lead us into the Swamp – be larger, be wiser, and see the wolves for who they are and what they want.
No one really gives a dang about a “Red Line”, what we care about is Truth – Justice – Truth – and Rising Above the Media Propaganda! If we hold course, if we give Syria back to their own way, and concentrate on the US, we have a chance. But the minute Trump becomes enamored with the false justice that has no evidence – he has lost his support, his respect, and his agenda.
Syria is the catalyst – true. But reviewing the military and Obama administration that glorified al-Qaeda and ISIS – is the game. Targeting Assad has gotten us into where we are today. Targeting the Syrian government has allowed ISIS to expand exponentially. Continuing the Obama agenda – is not going to solve the problem.
Give Assad his country. Let him lead his people as the Muslims need to be led. This is NOT our way, we can not make them like us, and we should finally realize this is simply a Saudi agenda for domination, and genocide.