Theresa May & Sadiq Khan Failing Grade

London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, is allowing the blasphemous blimp depicting a baby Trump to fly across London when Trump meets for a summit with Theresa May and The Queen.   Khan has been blatheringly belligerent in his view of Trump since Trump proposed a temporary ban on all Middle East Immigration in 2015.  Despite Trump congratulating Khan on his win as mayor, Khan has upheld his contempt, and the feud continues.

So what has Khan accomplished during his tenancy as Mayor of London?

Stabbings are at an all time high, the murder rate is up 40% rivaling New York City, which is actually dropping, there is a spike in gun crimes, he has cut the number of police officers on the beat, he has closed youth centers, and eliminated the two strikes law.  And like Obama’s tenure, London has seen a tremendous rise in ‘hate crimes’.

Khan is anti BREXIT and decided to use government money to create a report that supports his conclusion: A no-deal BREXIT would leave the economy diminished and the people poorer.  That is the conclusion Khan asked for and the conclusion the report defined.  Apparently, the report makes future predictions that by 2030, Britain’s national income will be 3% less… if there is no transition agreement and no trade deal.

Basically, the report is based on a worst case scenario assuming that nothing changes, that the government caves to its inability to do anything whatsoever, and to a stagnant population with closing finance institutions.  Dire.

But is it reality?

Racism is on the rise in London during Khan’s tenure too.  At least that is what the media claim.  But is it true?  Or is it the same stoking we saw too often under the Obama administration to invite a belief until the belief was believed as truth?   Initiating chaos and having the government help promote, incite and provoke?

The Guardian is even taking the racism agenda a step beyond rationale claiming that BREXIT caused racism.  Of course there are other culprits in the cause of racism – capitalism and the far right.

But it isn’t just London that is currently a chaotic mess, the entire UK Parliament has come unhinged with eruptions resembling a junior high playground of bully fighting, fists and unfiltered tongues included.  The notion of the English Gentleman is most definitely a novelty of many years past. And yet these same brewhards and blowhards would hypocritically paint President Trump in an unglamorous fashion all the while failing miserably to account for his accomplishments in this past year and a half.

What has Theresa May accomplished?  Boris Johnson?  Anyone within the UK Parliament?   A list does not even exist.

What the UK has managed is the creation of a strange lot of laws:

1)  Muslims may pray on the streets individually or enmasse.  However, a man who read aloud from the Bible was arrested for inciting hate speech.

2)   MI6 helped create the Trump Dossier.

3)   The Skripal case against Russia was never proven, nor was the evidence released despite the accusation and the ultimate prosecution being finalized.

4)   The UK has banned entry, and/or jailed, activists who hold to an anti-Muslim opinion because their speech might cause Muslim’s to become violent.  This is akin to jailing the victim of a crime.

If in fact either Khan or May had a slew of amazing accomplishments behind them as Mayor and PM, their derisive attitude toward Trump might have some basis.  But given that Trump has infinite accomplishments to their none makes the entire snub rattily snotty.

Obama’s Legacy of Gun Ownership

Hollywood is at the epicenter of a relatively new phenomena, “Ghost Guns”.   These are home made guns that gang members are resorting to because they can’t buy guns legally due to the fact that due to background checks they are labeled felons or mentally challenged.   Stealing guns has been the most prevalent method for obtaining guns, but as that becomes more difficult, another, easier method has gained traction.  Gang members can purchase the parts through unlicensed individuals, or even online and convert them to semiautomatic rifles or pistols with a few adjustments.

“An unfinished lower receiver, sometimes referred to as an “80% receiver,” can legally be purchased without a serial number from a seller who is not a federally licensed firearms dealer as long as it is missing the key components that would make it a firearm.” And those additional components can be purchased separately.  It’s a quirk in the law and California is the hub.

Building your own gun means it is unregistered, untraceable, and has no serial number.  It is easy to build, takes little knowledge of guns or powertools, and is completely unregulated.  Because you are buying ‘components’, even in Liberal Hollywood anyone can legally make the purchase without a background check.

Governor Jerry Brown nipped this loophole in the bud when he passed a new law requiring everyone making a homemade gun to request a serial number from the government first.  I’m sure all the gang members rapidly filled out their registration forms…  In addition, effective January 2018, Brown passed a law making the sale of ammunition subject to a background check. With one exception:  the sale of up to 50 rounds to any family member is not subject to the law… Why?  What is the point of an exception?

Despite these laws, two California cities remain in the top ten for crime rates;  Stockton and Oakland.  Still, Detroit, St. Louis and Baltimore hold the dubious honor of being the most violent cities in the US despite strident gun laws.

Ironically, Obama’s term registered one of the highest record in gun sales with 65.4 million during his first term alone or 91% more than Bush’s first term.   The two dominant type of firearms purchased during the Obama administration – AR15, and handguns, with women dominating the personal handgun market.  In anticipation of a Hillary win, gun manufacturers made 11.5 million guns in 2016, twice as many as in 2009.  The notion that Hillary would valiantly curb gun sales because that is the correlation…

During the Obama administration 254 died from mass shootings (Shootings where more than 10 died), and another 318 were injured.   That is more than ALL mass shootings combined before his Presidency dating since 1949!   A USA Today statistic states that mass shootings in which 4 or more died during the period between 2006 and 2017 (overwhelmingly Obama) accounted for 1358 victims (deaths and injuries).

Why did mass shootings rise so exponentially during the Obama administration, a Liberal who enforced higher gun control laws?  According to FBI statistics, in 2016, Obama’s legacy showed nearly an 8% increase in the homicide rate and a 3.4% increase in violent crime.  In 2015, the homicide rate increased by 11.4%.  In fact during his tenure nearly all crimes increased. What would be the motivation?  Gun ownership?  Hardly.

Legal gun ownership in the US is determined to be encapsulated in only 20-30% of the population given they own multiple weapons.  In 1991, the percent of households in the US that owned guns was 29%. Effectively these percentages reveal that legal gun ‘ownership’ is a non-sequitur to murder rates and violent crimes.   And in fact, it shows that since 1991 gun ownership – is a flat percentage.

This statistic would be similar to gun ownership in much more restrictive countries like Australia, where the rising gun ownership is in those that already own guns.

Illegal guns account for 94% of gun crimes. We know of two mass shootings that involved Ghost Guns.   But the gang violence has no statistics for Ghost Gun usage.  Tracking this phenomena is difficult although in 2015 the ATF estimated there were over 500,000 Ghost guns in California alone.

Both New Jersey and California are now trying to regulate gun parts.  But the measure is incredibly broad and could easily implode as definitions are loosely applied.

What we can conclude is that during Obama’s legacy not only did race issues rise exponentially, but alas so did crime, gun sales, and oh – health insurance premiums (I know, not related).  

FAKE Science – Crisis in Reproducing Conclusions

A Private Foundation that is funding Liberal agenda’s has one such agenda that bears definition:  reproducibility in science.

The Laura and John Arnold Foundation funds research into the reproducibility in sciencewhich is:  “a methodological crisis in science in which scholars have found that the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to replicate or reproduce on subsequent investigation, either by independent researchers or by the original researchers themselves.”

This failure to uphold scientific research and conclusions is apparently massive:

Chemistry – 87%

Biology – 77%

Physics and Engineering – 66%

Earth Sciences – 64%

In medicine 67% of medical researchers admitted to knowing someone who falsified their research.

Forget Fake News, Fake Science is far more pervasive and the consequences more staggering.   This means that the vast majority of all scientific fact cannot be verified as fact at all.  It means that science has evolved into a crystal ball magnitude of false conclusions effecting every aspect of society from basic medicine to sports and exercise, to diet, to psychology and even globalization.  The argument basis doesn’t EXIST.

This further denounces the cause for government sponsored University R&D on behalf of the pharma industry funded by taxpayer dollars!  The fake news is that the research is positive – the real news is the research conclusions may be faked.

Initially the conclusions were founded in psychology research.  Scientists from all over the world were asked to replicate the findings of a psychological conclusion that had been reported in a journal.   Within social studies, the ability to replicate the supposed published results was as low as 23%.  It is believed that authors were biased, careless, sometimes outright fraudulent, and of the belief that their conclusions would simply never be challenged. It was a tick mark for publication.

But this falsification of evidence expanded exponentially into all areas of science. It is believed that the perversity of reward created a decayed research for individual gratification instead of fact.

Today scientists are trying to backtrack on the problem by claiming it is not a crisis but more of a boo-boo.  Afraid of the backlash, they are attempting to redefine ‘replication’.  In addition, the number of studies that are failing in even small batches is highly significant.  One scientist attempted to dissuade the failure rate by stating that not all aspects of a conclusion need to be replicated, and that even if a small percentage can be assured, then the study should be considered in good standing and positive.

But I’m not willing to be only 23% cured… I’m not willing to spend 100% for a 23% conclusion…  If I buy a gallon of milk I don’t want to receive ¼ of a gallon…

It effects cancer research, vaccine research, psychological evaluations, and even global warming…

If a scientific conclusion cannot be replicated then the conclusion cannot be considered a fact, it can be considered a stated theory.   Scientists try to argue that replication is a personal issue with the replicating scientists, and not the conclusion.  But that might also indicate that the vaccine that is produced and manufactured is based on the conclusion of one study of one individual whose biological makeup is specific and not conventional, therefore individual number two would not respond the same way and the vaccine is ineffective on a mass level.

The entire scientific community argument in itself is filled with false and fraudulent convictions that further displaces the concept of fact. Unfortunately, if we call scientific conclusions as theory, it upends any argument affecting health, climate, disease, and psychology – it puts them out of business because they are now simpleton soothsayers.   It opens the doors to massive lawsuits.   And it turns the entire pharma industry upside down.

The ramifications could be a domino effect of such proportions that we have never seen before.  And they have gone into scramble mode to attempt to justify the faked results, the falsified conclusions, and the disproportionately low success rates.

Liberal Universities – The Coup of Private Foundations

The money trail of funding within our most prestigious universities provides an outline of demonstrative control, manipulation, and agenda.  Foundations are the forefront of that agenda, and each foundation’s board of trustees controls the agenda.  “We will give you money if you incorporate this curriculum, this ideology, and this methodology into the school.”  Thus assuring that the end product, the mind and thought process of the graduates, is aligned within a particular mode.  It is the ultimate mind control.  And Taxpayers Fund it.

Harvard is a liberal elite university that embodies such an agenda.  The Center For Education Policy Research is an adjunct to Harvard that cites three pillars:   research, tools and talent, and networks for sharing.   Basically, if we Follow The Money, our educators and school boards are the tools subject to the puppet masters who tell them what to think, what to teach, and what to advocate.  Within this, the Universities churn out more pawns aligned in a single policy thought who will become the next new politician telling more pawns the follies of what has become an imaginary world.

Major funders and Trustees include: Bill Gates, Hewlett Foundation, Ford Foundation, Bloomberg, Hecksher Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Bank of America, IBM, Austria’s Jabobs Foundation, The Atlantic Philanthropies, and the Walton family Foundation are among a few of the many contributors.  Their causes typically include;  global warming, planned parenthood, open society, Obamacare, population control, open borders, and “education reform”.

A few notable Foundations would seem to skew from the typical agenda’s of social policy reform.   One such organization is the Smith Richardson Foundation which is focused on international security and foreign policy, monetary, fiscal and tax policy, and a ‘global political change’.   One of the Trustees is a Hollywood film producer, Bill Stetson III whose credits include active membership in the Creative coalition, an advocacy group for Hollywood Liberals.

A quick look at their Form 990 for 2015 indicates some notable recipients of their grants which average roughly 4% of their total value:

  1. Center For A New America Security; CEO = Victoria Newland.They boast that a number of their employees were hired on by the Obama Administration and their experts are routinely quoted by NYT, CNN, WAPO, NBC, NPR, Jon Stewart and more.  Notable speakers have included;  Hillary, Gen Martin Dempsey, Madelaine Albright and Gen Petraeus.  They advocate ‘neoliberalism’.
  2. Institute For The Study of War; President = Kimberly Kagan, whose brother-in-law is married to Victoria Nuland.She was an instrumental source for advocating the surge/war in Iraq and a restructuring military in Afghanistan.  She works closely with Gen. Petraeus.  Chairman of the Board includes retired Gen Jack Keane.
  3. Center For Strategic and International Studies; President = John Hamre who served as Secretary of Defense under Bill Clinton, and worked closely with Obama to develop US cyber warfare. Notable cross political party speakers include;  John McCain, Henry Kissinger, Sam Nunn, Hillary, and Leon Panetta.  Controversial funding sources have included the governments of the United Arab Emirates, Japan, Norway, Germany, and China.

While Harvard is by no means alone in this ‘gifting schematic’ that is more closely related to blackmail, they are the Creme Brulee.  Other notables include:   Brown University, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado College, Cornell, Columbus, Cambridge, George Washington, Georgetown, John Hopkins, Oxford, Sacred Heart University, Stanford, Syracuse, University of Calgary, University of North Caroline, Yale, Notre Dame, Universities of Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Southern California, South Florida, etc…

The “education” curriculum is created to advance the ‘non-partisan’ thinking of these various non-profits whose Liberal and Progressive Global agenda is mapped within the guidelines of an Open Society, a Communist Globalization and an elite whose tentacles have reached across nearly every nation on earth.  Each of these Foundations have wealth exceeding  $500 million to $150 billion.  Follow The Money.

Attempting to attack or replace professors at the universities and in our high schools has about the same effect as treating cancer with Tylenol, it might stay the head-ache, but the cancer will continue to metastasize.

Hungary recently outlawed the Soros funded and sponsored university in Budapest, but a fight ensues for reinstatement.  We can’t simply shut down these universities across the US, we can’t regulate funding which typically is associated with a coercive requirement.  The overwhelming majority of teachers and professors are atheists, are Liberal, are intolerant – this coup has already been forged.

One way the Federal government can defrost the coup is to simply deny any more federal funding for private institutions.  Private Universities in the US are overwhelmingly Liberal.  The funding is typically obscured in the Research and Development area of the school’s programs.  But those programs bump the reputation of a school and its ability to attract more students.   The annual Federal funding is topping over $1 billion per university.

A large percentage of the R&D is for the development of more vaccines for the pharma industry. This means that while Big Pharma is a slush of profits, a slush of executive compensation greed, it is actually enabled and supported by Federal funding, or taxpayer dollars.  And to support the continuation of federal funding, states like California make vaccines mandatory.  The cycle is complete; the population control mandate of the elite is funded by the taxpayers whose bodies are now replete with aluminum, mercury, arsenic, formaldehyde, ethanol, and preservatives, while private industries and elite individuals generate more and more personal wealth.

An example of federal misappropriation of funding can be found in Planned Parenthood – or as the R&D describes it, ‘reproductive health’.  In reality it is eugenics.

If we are going to cease the agenda and reverse the Liberal coup, Federal Funding of R&D at Universities has to end.  Federal Funding of Private Foundations – has to end.  When we follow The Money, it becomes clear that the coup, the Liberal Agenda has been funded by you and I, and that’s why they are laughing.

Private Detention Facilities: Corruption within…

There are three main private contractors who own the immigrant detention centers;  GEO Group whose parent company is G4S, Corrections Corp of America which has been renamed Corecivic and Management and Training Corporation founded by Robert Marquardt.   Corecivic and GEO Group are actually public companies traded on the stock exchange.  And while all three are ‘independent’ per se, they receive the majority of their funding from the government.  So in essence they aren’t really private at all!  We as taxpayers fund them, including the Democrats and Socialists.  They are allotted money based on how many beds they fill.  Therefore, their incentive is to have prisoners and a steady flow of illegal immigrants.  Without them, they die.

Corecivic’s revenue topped $1.7 billion annually and GEO $2.26 billion – .  

Remember Thurgood Marshall, the American lawyer who served on the Supreme Court and was an active civil rights activist?  His son, Thurgood Marshall Jr., sits on the Board of Corecivic’s, after previously serving as cabinet minister to Bill Clinton, and advisor to Al Gore.   He is also on the Board of the Ford Foundation which is heavily involved in The Open Society causes.

Thurgood is also partner at the global law firm, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius with offices acrss the globe including Russia, clients that include Google, Apple, Microsoft, JP Morgan Chase and Amazon, – and Trump.   One of their attorneys, Jim Hamilton, was instrumental in vetting running mates for Hillary Clinton, Obama, John Kerry and Al Gore.  Jim Hamilton was appointed as a Director of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board – under Bill Clinton, 1995 – 1997.

An interesting ménage… Could this configuration be responsible for leaks as conflicting parties and agendas would seem to cross over?

CoreCivic — which profits from criminalized drug and immigration activity — has lobbied for policies that would fill its beds, rendering Marshall Jr.’s company leadership and recent donations to the CoreCivic PAC neutralizing forces against his father’s historic efforts.  There have been numerous allegations of abuse, mismanagement and corruption surrounding the facilities.

Still, Thurgood Jr., has utilized his connections to lobby for more strident laws aimed at filling the beds of the correctional and detention institutions.  Specifically harsher drug laws and harsher immigration laws. Follow the Money.

GEO Group owns facilities in Broward County Florida (where the mass school shooting occurred), Aurora Colorado (where the Aurora movie theatre shooting by Holmes occurred), Innumerable facilities in our outspoken Liberal California, Pennsylvania, Australia, and Texas predominantly.  They have been the subject of multiple lawsuits including wrongful death, bribery, corruption, deplorable conditions, failure to provide medical care, slavery, and mismanagement.

GEO Group’s predessor company name was Wackenhut Corrections which provided border patrol and security services.  Omar Mateen, the Orlando nightclub mass shooter was a security guard at G4S, the parent company of Wackenhut.

Management and Training is the only true ‘private’ contractor and the smallest of the three.  They are a family owned and operated business affiliated with Jobs Corp.

Bottom line, these facilities have operated on an agenda of more = better, more illegal immigrants = more money – for decades.   That would include Clinton, Bush and Obama.   In following the Money, Thurgood Marshall and his law firm have questionable relationships.   California, despite it’s Liberal bent seems to be a hothouse for the detention centers.

But the journalism has failed to provide a true picture of this phenomena or delved into its more dark web implications as the foster care, detention care institutions tend to be – a major source for the child sex trafficking.  It bears further investigation if they are truly concerned…

US Foreign Aid Goes to Pay For US Coups?

In 2011, Obama demanded Congress give Libya $17 million in aid to help counter terrorism, improve their military and secure their borders.  One month later Obama ordered an attack on Libya claiming Qaddafi was a dictator.

Obama then stated he wanted $120 million for Yemen in 2012 to promote democracy and human rights. And in 2015, Obama backed the Saudi war in Yemen.  Technically, the War in Yemen invoked by Saudi Arabia and assisted by the US and UK is still not considered a war per se, it is instead referred to as an ‘Intervention” that has lasted 3 years.  It’s all a word game.

The US backed coup in Ukraine during Obama’s tenancy, cost the US $5+ billion.  Today, the Ukraine is an utter mess of destabilized factions amidst the rise of right wing Nazi’s.

Before we destroyed Syria, Assad was our friend and ally who gave our intelligence agencies valuable information.  Syria has cost the US over $1 trillion.

Of course, lest we forget, this was the President given the Nobel Peace Prize that was determined before he even took office.  We like, and then we don’t, and so we – destroy.

Today, a German NGO is wandering the Mediterranean trying to find someone, anyone, who will accept 230+ Libyan migrants picked up at sea.   Germany doesn’t want them.  Italy turned the boat away, as did Malta.  Spain is brimming and refusing one more.  The NGO claims that given the situation in Libya, since its destruction while ousting Qaddafi, taking the Libyans back to Libya would possibly violate human rights.

So the boat has nowhere to go and wanders aimlessly.

The goal of the NGO, Mission Lifeline, is for the EU to grant visa’s to anyone and everyone who wants to come to Europe – that is, if their country of origin is Africa or The Middle East.

So the humanitarian crisis of immigration and refugees that Europe so embraced and demanded – is now a war of sorts as reality sets in and the governments realize they made a grandiose boo-boo.  And the Open Borders – are being Shut Down.

Oddly, many of those same governments, chastise Donald Trump for closing US borders, because well, its Trump.

The Mainstream EU government politicians do not have a flipping idea what they are doing!  They simply do – as they are told – and then attempt to fix the mess – the way they are told.

Maybe they should take the refugees to Ukraine?  Given they made such a glorifying success story of that coup.

And what happened to all that “Aid Money” that Obama so freely disbursed?

When Qaddafi was assassinated, he had wealth estimated at roughly $200 billion.   He was three times more wealthy than the second richest in the world, Carlos Slim, who is now the first.  Money held in some banks was seized by the various governments, including $37 billion in the US.  Other banks simply kept the funds.  And billions in gold that Qaddafi buried, have yet to be recovered – supposedly.  While the UN wanted an accounting, it would seem many countries decided – no.  And the UN said, “Okay.”

So if Qaddafi was worth $200 billion, why was the US giving Libya a dime?

Seems a bit convoluted unless the entire Libyan coup was designed to confiscate money.

And like most “Aid” to beleaguered countries by the US, Ukraine is no different with reports stating that the money is used to line the politician’s pockets.   Of course finding actual news on Ukraine is not likely to be truthful given the only agency remaining since the coup is the Kiev Post which is virtually dictated by the new and improved President, Poroshenko.  Chocolate Man.  His wealth is estimated to be roughly $1.6 billion, an increase of about 60% since taking over as President.

So why do we give Ukraine money?   Why don’t they invest in Poroshenko’s chocolate factory which is making beaucoup bucks?  Instead, they are limping along with GDP growth of 2% (which is somewhat lower than it was before the coup), inflation nearing 14% (which was at ZERO for the previous two years before the coup) and raucus backstabbing throughout their government.

Tell me again why we give them money?

All this comes about after someone asked whether we were giving aid money to El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico given their export of migrants to the US?   And the answer is yes, consider millions.  We give money to a government that is considered corrupt enough that it’s citizens decide they must flee to the US and illegally enter so that the US can spend over $50,000 per child and immigrant in a detention center or a jail cell or on welfare.

Why do we give money to countries that don’t spend it on The People?

Unfortunately, Israel is not that much better:

Israel is the largest recipient of US aid – $3.77 billion annually. 

Secular Jews in Israel make up 40-50% of the population.

Muslims make up 20% of the population.

20% of the population identify as Orthodox Jews.

Most PM’s in Israel’s past identified as ‘secular.

Most, if not not nearly all, of Hollywood’s Jewish population identify as – secular.

George Soros is quite definitively – Secular.

So tell me, why do we give them money? To counter the potential Muslim advances that could initiate from the Middle East, the same Middle East with which we trade trillions in weapons that could be used to decimate – Israel.

Okay, so now I understand. We are giving Israel money to buy weapons from us, so that they can arm them to fight against the countries in the Middle East whom we have armed and pose the greatest threat to WWIII, although they are a predominantly secular country that is comprised of ‘ethnic Jews’ and Muslims. Perhaps the point is to give a country Aid so that they put it in a US or UK bank that can subsequently be confiscated once we declare that country a threat and a coup is required so as to sanction the funds deposited.

But we don’t have a problem with The Swamp…

Merkel Building Detention Centers – or Reception Centers?

Angela Merkel is under fire as her popularity wanes between 35 and 50% on a good day.  Why?  Because of her embracing of illegal immigrants.  So she is now in Lebanon desperately trying to see if Germany can get rid of, pawn off, their immigrants by shipping them ‘elsewhere’.   But it wasn’t quite phrased in this way.  The Media phrasing is interestingly culled to read a different scenario.   She states that she wants to find a way to host immigrants closer to their native home, say in – Lebanon for instance – and out of Germany – for instance.   She is proposing building Reception Centers on behalf of Lebanon to house the immigrants within their country confines.  

After condemning Assad and helping to create the absolute devastation of the entire country of Syria, Merkel now wants to provide these Syrian refugees with a path home, via Lebanon’s Reception Centers.

Untangled, what does this really means:

  1. a) Merkel is fighting for her life to secure her constituency in Germany which has been severely harmed by her open borders policy at the behest of George Soros.
  2. b) No one wants her refugees, so she is trying to ‘convince’ Lebanon’s PM Hariri, to take them while Germany continues to pay for them.
  3. c) In exchange Lebanon would allow Germany to gain contracts for infra-structure projects in Lebanon. Germany would likely under-bid the projects in order for them to appear as the legitimate winner and so the German taxpayers will pick up the slack.
  4. d) For media purposes, instead of calling the refugee facilities, Detention Centers, they have come up with the novel idea of referring to them as “Reception Centers”. Thus while they will be the same as the centers in the US, they will be labeled with Mary Poppins sweetness and nice.

The number of Syrians in Germany varies by media/polls and census from 200,000 to 640,000.  Quite a broad discrepancy for a transparent government? 

According to a report issued by GDMAC, the EU determined that refugees had a ‘positive impact on the economy’, with an average contribution of .3% despite increased spending for infrastructure and housing.  If this were in fact true, then obviously Germany would not be looking to expel migrants – they would continue to embrace more and more.  Right?  And according to the OECD, the additional expenditures for migrants will positively impact per capita income in Germany.  Whose?  The Rothschild’s?

Sweden is the second largest port for refugees.  And yet, despite all the glowing support for more and more, the UN stated that as a result of Sweden’s acceptance of refugees and immigrants, Sweden will become a third world country by 2020.

So who do we believe? Obviously if the OECD and GDMAC agencies are correct then the refugees have a positive influence and more would be better – right?   But if in fact that influence was positive, then why would Merkel and the German government be so radically fearful and demand to expel these adjuncts to their economy?

Spin.

As Glen Beck attempted to enunciate, in the US, as the Hollywooders form the basis of the screaming fits of defamation, what has any of them actually done?  Has Rob Reiner offered to bring 2000 children to his home?  Has Chelsea Handler offered to help them find their parents and fly them back home?   Has The View paid for their Reception Center costs?   Has De Niro provided a diaper?  Have any of the Hollywood instigators done anything at all other than scream?   No. Not a one.  They lend their name because Liberals are like rock and roll groupies fawning after, drooling after ‘a name’ without regard to the character substance and the Hollywood’s are ‘being paid’.  Big Bucks.

The fake politician is easy to spot – they will criticize and demonize the current politician – and then offer to give free education, free healthcare, free food, free air, free clothes…  while never telling you – how.  Because NOTHING is free.  They may claim they are Democrats, Socialists, Independents, or even Republicans, but in the end, their single agenda is to promise everything while never providing the means or a solution to any crisis.

Merkel is using a framed white washing of words to create exactly what the MSM and Hollywood are screaming about in the US while blaming Trump.   She is posturing to create Detention Centers in Lebanon at taxpayer expense while buying/blackmailing Saudi Arabia’s Hariri, to give Germany contracts to undercut building infrastructure projects – also at German taxpayer expense – so that she can gain traction in beleaguered polls and pretend she is not really selling her country.  And while the actual number of Syrian refugee’s in Germany has a range of +/- 300%, I wonder how many will find themselves detained in these ‘prisons’? Caged.  I mean, hotels.

Jordan continues to cage refugees since originally being detained in 1947.   Millions.  But no one scuttles even an ‘outcry’.   As Glenn Beck asked the defeated CNN, Brian Stelter, if it is about the numbers, then what is the number?  And Stelter dignified the question with the response, well as the numbers rise, so does the indignation… if it is ten we don’t care, but 2000, now we care.  Okay.  Then why isn’t he talking about Jordan?

Because, he was lying.

Of course, Saudi Arabia will have to get some cut in the deal… as they own Lebanon’s Hariri.  I’m sure more weapons at cheaper prices might be in the making as we speak.

In the end, Merkel is playing into the part of the fool, just as she played into the part when Soros bullied her into accepting millions of refugees four years ago and she fawned and bowed to his will as though he was god.  

Ultimately, Germany will come tumbling down, and Soros will be laughing hysterically at how easily Merkel was pawned.  It has nothing to do with the people, not the people of Germany, Sweden, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Yemen, Lebanon, or any other country.  It is all about an agenda game played by Swamps that rule everywhere.

Fake Political Party – a Chess Game

As the UK is beleaguered in the BREXIT divide, once again the Soros advocates are pushing protests and chaos calling for a ‘re-vote’.   The absurdity becomes laughable when we consider how this might play out.  It is reminiscent of Hillary demanding a re-vote when she lost.  I was a contender, I shoulda won! Therefore shoulda means we need a redo. Imagine the chaos if every year we had to do a  ‘redo’ of every vote the previous year?  Why bother voting?   As we see with BREXIT, it is not about moving forward after The People spoke, it is about two years of fighting about the outcome of the vote – and going nowhere.

The ridiculousness of the UK Parliament insubordination and ineptitude is framed in ‘not making a decision’ and instead voting agreeing that a decision will be deferred to a later time.  Two years have passed – and the latest vote was no exception.

These same ‘lawmakers’ who are truly incapable of actually making any political decision or decisive action, are quick to make sarcastic and defaming remarks about Trump as though they have lost every aspect of moral and ethical decorum.   In fact, their lacking decorum targets what they perceive to be Trump’s lacking decorum…

For example, what has Boris Johnson accomplished during his tenure?   

Well, he voted for the invasion of Iraq only later to demand Tony Blair’s impeachment for the UK’s collusion in invading Iraq.  He went to the Chinese Summer Olympics and offended his hosts.  He continued his journalism career while Mayor despite promising he would not.  He ended London’s oil deal with Venezuela and scrapped inspections of black cabs…  He was for BREXIT and against it and for it and against it.   Blowing wherever the wind blew him.  He has effectively done nothing for 15 years.

He has been hailed by The Economist for his decidedly liberal tendencies despite Johnson claiming he is a conservative.  The Economist is owned by the Rothschilds.

Boris Johnson is the UK’s implant of McCain.

The waters become more and more muddied as politicians are told to switch their affiliation in a subversive means of undermining the party.

Soros infiltrated US Republicans long ago, to think he hasn’t taken over the UK Parliament is short-sighted.  US Republicans that Soros has backed include:  McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John Boehner, Ed Royce, Charles Grassley, Ron Johnson, Cathy Rodgers and Dan Donovan.

ALL of these Republicans have either aggressively spoken out as anti-Trump or voted against his proposals including Iran, North Korea, trade, immigration, etc…

Colorado’s ultra-liberal, John Hickenlooper, and Ohio’s, John Kasich, are in discussion mode to form a ticket together in the 2020 presidential election.  In preparation, Kasich has been vocal about how successful and brilliant he is earning himself star appearances on liberal MSM outlets. He has also chosen to be rather disparaging of Trump regarding the detention of illegal children.

Many people vote by party, without researching anything at all.   So how can one discern who is a fake representative of their party?

More and more it is important to ‘follow the money’, because a politician who is pursuing an agenda, is a politician who has no ethic.  Of course, determining what that agenda is can also be rather difficult.   If the motive is to destabilize, to create chaos and division, that would be a first agenda.  If the MSM is supportive, that would indicate an approved agenda.

Adding to the fray is the hacking issues.   Today it was revealed that Wikileaks released the personal information of all ICE employees.  And so, the MSM has made it a Julian Assange terror attack.   But – what is the agenda?   In the midst of Trump’s zero tolerance for illegal immigration, taking down ICE would support the liberal agenda.  The obvious and logical conclusion is that WikiLeaks has been hacked, compromised.  Assange himself has been said to be in dire health, and the Ecuadorian embassy has said that ‘any communication’ would give them cause to expel him.

Whose agenda has it been for the last two years to take down Julian Assange?

Hillarygate.

She claimed that Wikileaks was partially responsible for her loss.

A party affiliation is meaningless any longer.   Follow the agenda.  Follow the money.  Kasich has penned a book… remind you of anyone else ramping up wealth in order to run for office?  Who else is writing a book?

Child Detention Centers Generated $5.2 Billion Annually?

October 2012, a scathing article was written exposing the Obama Practice of putting illegal alien children crossing the border alone in prison like detention centers, and given the lack of space, sometimes they had to be housed at military facilities.   Between October 2011 and June 2012, border agents apprehended 15590 children and put them in detention centers.   There were no parents in these shelters. 

In 2014, a USA Today article again unleashed a scathing report as it exposed 90,000 unaccompanied children were now living in US detention centers, while 1100 of them were being housed at a Texas Air Force base due to lacking space.

It was revealed that according to Homeland Security:

“Several temporary and permanent resettlement centers on the border have opened just to house unaccompanied migrant children. But the HHS’ Administration for Children & Families, which has responsibility for the children, won’t say where the centers are or how much is being spent for the kids’ care.”

Federal law states that the unaccompanied children are supposed to be turned over to HHS within 72 hours and then reunited with parents or other relatives already living in the United States.

But they weren’t – otherwise there would be no need for so many Detention Facilities.  Follow The Money.   The Walmart in Brownsville Texas that garnered all kinds of conspiracy theories that it was going to be a prison for US citizens when Obama declared Marshall Law – was actually transformed into a ‘children’s detention facility’ and shuttered from the press or public – by Obama.

The conditions of some facilities were so awful a complaint was filed by the American Civil Liberties Organization citing children not even given water, molestation, and beatings.   At the time federal funding cuts were being made against organizations that were tasked with addressing this problem. Appropriations were scarce, and according to the article:  “The problem with the administration is they don’t want to give information,” he said. “In fact, there’s times when they don’t want to give information to members of Congress. It’s almost like they don’t want the American public to know about the situation.”

The issue was obviously quite alive and thriving throughout the entire tenure of the Obama Administration who wanted to cover it up, and pretend it didn’t exist.

In fact, the exact same photos were being splashed across the media exposing ‘cages’ and over-crowded facilities – in 2014.

But it even gets better for those with short term memory loss.  In 2016, Obama was attempting to force the state of Texas to grant the largest child detention facility a new classification “Child Care Facility”, despite the fact that it was originally built as a prison for men.   It boasts a gym, Zumba classes, a beauty salon, playgrounds and a school, not exactly short-term – as in 72 hour holding.   While opponents wanted the facilities shut down and the children released, Obama argued that it would not be in their best interest and granting child care status would open the facilities up to receiving considerably more government funding.

A former employee at one of the Texas centers stated that, “security locked up migrant mothers who spoke out about the conditions. She said a psychologist worked as an informant for federal agents, and that her bosses regularly asked her to omit complaints to hide them from government audits. In early 2015 and again in December 2015, migrants at the center went on hunger strikes.”

Obama argued that sending the children to live with their relatives while giving them an ‘ankle bracelet’ to monitor them would only cost $17 a day compared to the $159 per day it cost to house a child in a detention center – or roughly $4800 per month per child – $58,000 per year!  And Obama wanted to expand the cost… why?  Most likely because he is a share holder through a series of offshore trust accounts.

So the disservice that Time Magazine, The Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, Mika Brzezinski and all the despicable faces in Hollywood  have conveniently forgotten – is the POLICY was not only created by the Obama Administration, but they fought tooth and nail to make it into a mega-business venture utilizing taxpayer funding! At $58,000 a head times 90,000 children – that translates to a $5.22 billion annual revenue…

Border Crossing = Child Trafficking

The easiest way to fight and purge the rhetoric being spewed from the mouths of babes and boys is to offer statistics.  The Department of Homeland Security releases annual tables that provide data on illegal entry, asylum entry, children entry, by country, by age, by most any characteristic. Statistics.

They portray a clearer picture of what is happening, by whom, and to whom.  For example:

  1. Aliens Determined Inadmissible By Region and Country of Nationality:   Politico and DW have not done their homework.   In 2016, Obama sent back over 274,000, 192,000 came from Mexico, 48,000 from Asia (China), and  only 9900 came from South America (Honduras and Guatemala).

Therefore the notion that the majority of these immigrants are fleeing the crime and persecution of South America – is not even remotely accurate.

  1. Aliens Apprehended by Region and Country of Nationality:   In 2016, the total was 530,000 with 501,754 coming from – Mexico, 9875 from South America, and 12,267 from Asia.
  2. Petitions For Naturalization Filed and Denied:   In 2016, 972,000 were filed and 86,000 were denied.  This number was roundly beaten in 1996, and 1997 when Clinton was President, and in 2007 under Bush. In fact during Clinton’s term, roughly 8 million were naturalized.  Obama came in at a close second.
  3. The TOTAL number of people granted ‘Asylum’ is barely a thread by comparison.   According to the DHS, in 2016 11,729 were given asylum, the majority came from Guatemala, Honduras, el Salvador, China, Iraq, and Syria.

Another DHS Table reflects the fact that the vast majority of illegal immigrants in the US came here during the Clinton years of 1997 thru 2001 numbering roughly 7 million of the total 12 million coming from Mexico – and roughly 1 million coming from South America.   It is estimated that the gang population in the US is about 1.5 million.  The majority of the gang population is of Hispanic origin including Mexico, el Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala.

Chicago has the highest gang population, followed by Los Angeles, Detroit, and Camden, NJ.

According to the State Department, 600,000-800,000 people are trafficked across our borders every year – half of them are children.  According to NGO’s the figure is well over a million.   They are used for sexual perversity.  Where is Peter Fonda?  The View? Hillary?  Half a million children!

According to Project Muse, which researches trafficked children, in many instances parents or smugglers are paid by family members to bring their children to the US for the purpose of becoming a sex slave.  They sell their children.  Follow the money.

According to a State Department report issued during the Obama administration, the top three regions of origination for trafficked children in the US include; the US, Mexico and Philippines.  The most vulnerable children within the US include those in the child welfare system and juvenile justice systems.   These statistics would thus support the Franklin Scandal of the 1980’s and the Jimmy Savile Scandal in the UK of the same time frame.  Both took their victims from group homes, foster homes, and government funded detention centers holding youth.

These statistics completely upend the Democrat cratting, the Hollywood wooding, and the media diafying… because of 2300 children held in border detention centers with some crying…  It does not even compare to the true tragedy and represents  .4% of the children suffering sexual abuse.  Closing the borders, closes the hole of traffickers.   It is odd who wants ‘open borders’, could it be because they support child trafficking?   And that is the real issue.  Where will the perverts and pedophiles find their victims if the borders are closed?   Epstein Island?   Burned to the ground.

The blubbering Senators who claim children were crying in the Detention Center?  Obviously they haven’t spent much time at home – or in a Day Care, because children CRY!   I recently had the fortune/misfortune of sitting in the ‘cry room’ at church where ten toddlers cried and wailed the entire time!  Not one of them was being mistreated, and they were WITH their parents.

The argument is stupid and only supports the ignorance of the elite who don’t actually raise children – but exploit them instead for sexual perversity.  If we close the borders, these people will have to go to other countries to get their yum-yums.  And other countries might actually prosecute them.  Oh darn.

So tell me Politico, Hillary, Comey, Fonda, and The View – where are those 1 million sexually molested children that have gone missing each and every year… worldwide?  Why aren’t you offended?  What about the UN Peacekeepers who rape and trafficking children each year?  Where is your outrage?   Obvious.