REFUGEE CRISIS – Solutions

Africa now has 65.6 million “displaced people”/ refugees due to ongoing violence… where are they supposed to go? Why isn’t this news? What is being done?

Answers: nowhere, unworthy, and nothing.

While Africa looms large in their crisis, the total number of displaced persons/refugees from Syria is estimated to be over 6.3 million. From Afghanistan, the number is estimated to be over 7.6 million. And we have the audacity to claim we ‘saved Syria’ from the brutal Assad regime…

In South Sudan a civil war for the past 3 years has taken over 300,000 lives and displaced 3.5 million people. Famine is rampant, an estimated 6 million are starving, and ethnic cleansing is the mainstay. Reading the reason for the fighting, it could easily transpose into the tit-for-tat, hatred we are witnessing in the US. There was some cattle rustling, some fear, and some different culture ideals that brought about a massive unabated war.

Most ‘displaced’ Africans go to Ethiopia, Kenya and then to Turkey and Europe if they are lucky. But if Germany can’t handle 1 million refugees, how the heck is Europe supposed to absorb 80 million? Obviously, it can’t. That would mean, making the refugee crisis Europe’s responsibility is motivated by an alternate agenda.

The long term effects of Europe’s Socialist government has resulted in a skew that could spiral them into an economic collapse.  Without a growing population every country in Europe is witnessing a skew heavily weighted in the age group over 65 and lack of laborers to support them. Falsely manipulated into thinking the solution was to bring in refugees and train them to be their labor supply hasn’t worked – and won’t ever work.

First, it is a form of slavery. Second, mashing together two conflicting cultures might work to some degree, but that degree is miniscule. The cultural differences being addressed in attempting to brainwash Middle Eastern and African cultures in Europe range from rape to incest, from honor killings to pedophilia, and from terrorism to massacres. And in the process, the German culture, the French Culture, the Swedish culture is systematically being wiped out as it is ‘offensive’ to the newcomers.

Before we saved Syria and created a 6.3 million loop of poverty and death, President Assad was ‘accused’ of many heinous crimes, none of which were ever proven, and all of which still remain “alleged”. What we fail to understand is that cultures are better served by their own. Attempting to recreate Syria, we created a massive cesspool that has grown exponentially.

Now the UN is talking about how much money world economies must shuck up to rebuild Syria so that all the remaining 13 million may once again live happily-ever-after under their chosen regime.

The newest claim is that Assad was/is working in conjunction with al-Qaeda and ISIS.   The absolute absurdity and purpose of this claim is simply to rewrite history. ISIS wasn’t even in Syria until the regime was ousted by the US and coalition forces, leaving a vacuum for a takeover. In addition, the claim doesn’t address the major ethnic cleansing attribute which exists between Sunni’s and Shias. Assad is an Alawite, or Shia, ISIS is Sunni. The dominant proclamation of ISIS is to kill Shia and Christians.  The Sunni nations of the Middle East wanted a Sunni in power in Syria.  End of story.

The European obsession with saving all these poor refugees does little to solve the problem and a lot to creating new problems. While the obvious solution would be to back-off interference and stop destroying entire countries, the issue we now face is how to fix our colossal error in judgment, ie, rebuild Syria and put a halt to the Africa Land Grabs that have spiraled them into a cycle of greater famine while redirecting waterways and thus creating man-made droughts and agriculture devastation.

So while London is considering grabbing empty apartments from landlords and giving them to the displaced, maybe Africa should consider grabbing back all their land and evicting the Land Grabbers. Redistributing the land back to their people, could quell the famine that is causing civil wars as survival is the end game.

Unfortunately, as a result of our interference, Syria is more complicated because ISIS now controls parts of the country.  So until ISIS is eliminated, rebuilding is a mammoth waste of time.  But then the UN isn’t known for their ‘decision making skills’.

 

 

 

 

From Macron to Grenfell Tower – Real News

While the media has continued its unabated, unabashedly tiresome, laborious focus on Russia, Mueller, Sessions, and Trump, the World has subtly shifted.

According to The Economist, a Rothschild magazine, Emanuel Macron, France’s new President is slated to become the Savior of Europe! The cover of the magazine depicts him ‘walking on water’ with the legs and high heels of his opponent, Marine le Pen, stoically sticking out of the water as she has obviously drowned. The purpose of this oblique image is to liken Macron to Christ.

I guess that pretty much sums up the views of The Economist on just about – everything…

Macron belongs to a movement that has shed the traditional Liberal and Socialist parties and renamed his La Republique en Marche. Translation: To move forward the republic (France).

He won because he was bought by Rothschild, groomed by Rothschild, and prepared by Rothschild like a toy. He is told what to say, how to say it, when to say it, and where.   He has been emptied and refilled with the propaganda and the objectives of his Handler.

What transpired is about to bring about a similar shift in the US. It is a warning. The Republican and Democrat traditional parties are being destroyed. While the rhetoric against the GOP is obvious, the parallel fall of the Democrats is a bit more shadowed.  But they too will fall in a pit of flames, like the Grenwell Tower.  So entrenched in self, the Liberals can’t imagine anything could possibly destroy them – except, of course, themselves.

A new Party is most likely being created right now, beneath our noses, and we blindly focus instead on the tear down of the GOP while that is only half the agenda. These parties are dead.  People are seeing mass exodus as the ethics, the Swamp, the corruption  –  is so pervasive we want out.  Unfortunately, it is the Soros Democrats creating the new and improved Party while the Republicans continue to whine.

While the news continues to bore and boar on and on ad nauseam, The Economist has also instituted a hate platform against Theresa May blaming her for the fire that destroyed the Grenfell Tower in London. Why? Because they claim that she has been lax in initiating proper building and fire codes that would have prohibited the use of a particular siding material that is very flammable, and possibly a major contributory factor in the spread of the fire.

But that actually isn’t her job.  Those regulations fall on the Building Regulators and the Secretary of State and the Local Authority – mayor Sadie Khan.  Why Theresa May?  Because the Rothschild agenda is to have her expelled and vacate BREXIT.

Facebook is alive with propaganda hailing Muslims as being the greatest heroes in helping the injured at the scene of the Grenfell Tower, it should be noted that Muslims were the dominate tenant of the Tower, and thus were evacuating and tending to their neighbors and friends. The neighborhood outside of the Tower is predominantly upper echelon, the only Muslim population was from the Tower itself.  While this does not diminish the fact that Muslims were helping their friends and families, it does provide a perspective of why and where they came from… Grenfell is Public Housing amidst ritzy enclaves.

In the UK, the Local Authority is responsible for approvals and compliance with statutory regulations, including building codes. That would mean the responsibility for London’s fire would defer not to Theresa May, but to the mayor, Sadiq Khan. The Economist is a backer of Khan and therefore shifting blame to Theresa May serves a profound purpose not unlike the blame game played by both Hillarygate and Obama.

Corbyn is using the tragedy to create a Socialist name for himself as he calls for any vacant apartments to be immediately seized by the government and distributed to the tenants who lost their housing in the fire. Taking a tragedy and making a larger tragedy will not solve the problem. It will create chaos and derision as landlords react to their property being seized without consent.  This is a typical Communist move.

The Local Authority or Council was created in 1963 by the “London Government Act”. Not the UK Government. Council Leadership was elected in May 2014 by The People. The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea manages the property and is run by 13 tenants. Therefore, if blame is to be rendered, render it where it belongs.

But instead the media is fervently bent on making the Grenfell Tower fire the sole responsibility of Theresa May.   Khan is somehow exempt and the Local Authority is somehow exempted – at least by the press. Blaming does nothing to solve the problem for now or for the future. The siding used on the Tower was highly flammable and barred from use in both the US and Germany.

The Building Committee for Regulations reports to the UK Secretary of State. The Office for Secretary of State For Communities and Local Government is currently held by, Sajid Javid.

World News has been snuffed in the US as belabored dollars are ravaged on Committee after Committee proving nothing except the fact that the Swamp Lives and Breathes!

US Crumbling Into Chaos

Any more, when reading the news, it appears as though the US is a third world country spiraling into the factions and fractions of the Tutsi and Hutus.   While many journalists would claim that their animosity stems from religion, in fact it is a class warfare that has escalated to ethnic cleansing. It is the same ‘class division’ envisioned by Obama in creating a separation of Americans in a war of entitlement, hatred, and death.   And it very well may erupt into an ethnic cleansing as ‘Democrats” up their war-anti and begin to literally kill Republicans.

Like in Africa, there is a beating drum, a rally to violence that is stoked and fermented by the desire for chaos. Ultimately, that chaos could actually spiral the US into a third world stratosphere leaving two major countries defending their sovereignty; Russia and China.

Even more disturbing is the fact that this is not even being orchestrated by China and Russia, but by internal forces looking to up end world order. I imagine these countries are looking on in amazement and shaking their heads as they watch the clear destruction of our world as we know it all the while accepting it, prodding it, and spiraling in the wickedness it embraces.

I watch it not just on the scale of countries and cities, but it has seeped into homes and families. This prevalence of hate has stained people that profess innocence, victimhood, and even Christian ideology.   And they defend it. Justify it. Only to have their spiral gain momentum.

The news of destruction and death and mayhem is no longer the subject of only third olrd countries, it has become the mainstay in the US and Europe. London’s mayor, Khan, simply shrugs his shoulders as he can’t understand why people don’t accept this transformation willingly. “It is our way of life.” He is quoted as saying.

Really? Because it didn’t use to be! So why should it be now?

Hoodwinked. With the drug induced sixties generation, we created a generation of mottled intellect. It was not a coincidence. It was carefully planned so as to keep control. While the hippies and flower children protested, the stage was set in motion and played like a lyre. Without any intervention, with and antipathy toward voting, doing, or knowing what was truly happening.

And here we are.

What is the solution? When chaos rules, order must be sustained. It will require an immediate and conclusive consequence for actions to stabilize what has run amuck. We are witnessing the absolute rebellion of law in our government – and I’m not speaking of Trump, but of those that ruled before and instituted this mayhem mess.

That would mean that Hollywood does NOT have a greenlight to instill hatred. Comedians do NOT have an out clause from the Constitution. And the mainstream media is NOT permitted to instigate and defile without suffering consequences.   It means reorganizing ‘public’ schools which are funded by taxpayer dollars to eliminate political bias, environmental bias, and teach the fundamental basics. It means everyone has the same right under freedom of speech – including Christians.

When my kids were in middle school, the new Principal created a rule; any student or teacher who said ‘Merry Christmas’ was automatically suspended for three days.   Christmas cards were not allowed to be exchanged – or suffer suspension.  What happened to that Freedom of Speech? It was squelched behind a misinformed interpretation that applies to a select few that are never subject to consequences for their actions.

What we cannot do is to curl up and cry.

We are not alone. The battles are everywhere, throughout our homes, our schools, our cities – everywhere. Each one of us is fighting for our life in a different vacuum of chaos. Myself included.  Each of us has a story. But if we give up, then we will be slain and the wolves will simply seek another victim.  

GUNMAN TARGETS GOP

We are now immensely saddened to hear the consequence of ‘inciting hatred’. This is the real life reaction of a brutal campaign advocated by Democrats, the media, Entertainers, and Comedians who demand members of the Republican party be shot, stabbed, killed, beheaded, and massacred. It isn’t a comedy routine. It is the perverse consequence of a more perverse incitement.

It may be orchestrated by Soros, but The People should have the ability, the morality, the most basic of ethical values to know, to see, and to step away from the frayed frenzy.

Interestingly, Democrats are claiming it isn’t incitement, it is guns. It isn’t about Democrats and Republicans, despite what the gunman said, it is about the ‘unbalanced’. It isn’t about the vile tongue lashings, or the call for anarchy, it is about Trump and entitlement, and the “Me” generation.

Give me what I demand or I will throw a tantrum. And when I grow up, I have no boundaries, I know nothing of values, nothing of good or bad, I only know what I have been taught – life is about ME.

What creates the ‘unbalanced’?  What creates ‘Incitement”?  Not guns – people.

So far, the only one dead is the gunman, although numerous politicians and aides are in the hospital. Releasing between 50 and 100 shots, he knew his mark, it was everyone, because they were the bad guys, they were Republicans. He was in a stocked fishing pond.

Nothing has been released about the gunman.

Comedians Want Free Speech?

Bill Maher, Kathy Griffin, and a host of other ‘comedians’ believe they should be given special privileges to offend, malign, and slander. But of course, those privileges should not extend to anyone else. Why? Because they are elitist. They are ‘special’.   Because they ‘deserve’ to be immune. Kathy Griffin came out publically after berating the President, maligning him, and then implying she was ISIS beheading him, and cried because Trump was a bully…

So how would this notion of entitlement play out?

I imagine we would suddenly have a plethora of people claiming they are comedians when charged with lible and slander in court. “It was a joke…” Much like the ‘Twinkie Defense”. The Twinkie made me do it.   Now it would be “Can’t you take a joke?” Everyone jokes a bit, does that mean everyone is really a comedian?

According to various sources, the definition of comedian is: “A person who makes people laugh by telling jokes and acting foolish for an audience.” Charlie Chaplin was an amazing comedian. Then there was Abbott and Costello, Sid Caesar, Dom DeLuise, and thousands more. What made them funny was not how they maligned and slandered other people, but how they made their own character the brunt of comedy.

Comedy was about making fun of one self.

I’m not sure when it became a gun show with everyone else the target, but too often that comes across as simply arrogant and petty.   I have walked out on a few supposed comedians because they were all about pointing a finger, all about look at that stupid person, instead of poking fun at their own errs in life.

It is actually the same in church. When a Preacher starts by pointing a finger and railing on about how sinful the congregation is, people start to shift, lose focus, and their thoughts will typically go to – “Well you are too…”   By contrast, when a Preacher creates his sermon around his own perils and hiccups, people are more likely to relate and take a deeper look into themselves.  It is reflective instead of accusatory.

This bizarre entitlement of speech is highlighted in many liberal newspapers as well. The Washington Post and New York Times went so far as to create tag lines claiming they were the Truth, they were the only source for real Truth. And yet, their Headlines are riddled with defaming our President. That’s not Truth, that is defamatory.  Finding an article that is positive, or unbiased, – ever – is like “Where’s Waldo”. There might be one, but it takes a lot of detailed eyes to find it within the plethora of look-alikes.

Another notable advocate of free speech is Reza Aslan who was recently fired from CNN for his Twitter tirades in which he liberally defamed and cussed various politicians and Trump.

While The Freedom of Speech is a Constitutional right, there are limitations that seem to be ignored, including :

“Libel,  slander, obscenity, pornography, sedition, incitement, fighting words, classified information, copyright violation, trade secrets, non-disclosure agreements, right to privacy, right to be forgotten, public security and perjury.”

Fighting Words? The legal definition has morphed since it was first introduced making cuss words permissible. Incitement? I imagine holding a decapitated head of our President is most definitely a form of incitement… I imagine demanding someone be ‘raped’ or ‘shot’ is most definitely a form of incitement and clearly crosses the line of legality – but also ethics and morality.

Bottom line. Many in society seem to have lost the concept of integrity, defined as having strong moral values and honesty. Everyone believes they are honest, but moral values are bit more subjective. So I thought I’d see how the New York Times might see this.

According to an article published in 2015 by The New York Times, morality is subject to relativism and cultural differences. Which basically means that it is completely up for grabs and there are little, or few, absolutes.

In essence, society has broken down into an ‘anything goes’ without boundaries of ethics, moralities or even legal absolutes. And in that mantra, entitlement abounds.  And so we are left with a bizarre concept that comedians be given special rights to malign, slander and incite hatred…, newspapers be allowed to malign and incite hatred, and boundaries are simply a puritan ideology of the past.

James Comey: Death of a Salesman

In the play, Death of a Salesman, Willy Loman vacillates between different perceptions of his life. After confronting his boss and demanding a better situation, Willy gets angry and finds himself fired. Caught in a series of lies, debt and a downward spiral, Willy ultimately kills himself enabling his wife and sons to reap the benefits of his life insurance policy.

There seem to be parallels in the life of FBI Director, Comey and Willy Loman. His testimony revealed a weak, unethical, small man unable to take a leadership position, which ultimately resulted in an anger vent that resulted in his getting fired. Now caught in a series of lies, leaks and unlawful actions, Comey is spiraling.

Hillary’s hacked emails and personal server, opened up ‘an investigation’. Former Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, meets with Billy Clinton on his private plane, has a private discussion, and then apparently tells Comey to back off, don’t call it ‘an investigation’, but refer to it as a ‘matter’ so that Hillary’s run for President won’t be impacted.

The Swamp is coming apart at the seams.

Comey got caught in a lie: Comey declared that his ‘leaking’ was a consequence of Trump’s tweet, but in fact the tweet came after the leak.

So we now have a man who was in the position of one of the US government’s highest order and power, admitting that he succumbed to pressure/blackmail in the Hillary email scandal, and just now lied before a Congressional Committee.

During Comey’s short tenure as FBI Director, the department is said to have fractured and as a result of his actions the FBI and Comey are now subject to investigation.  Their reputation in the twalette, and turmoil prevails.

What happened?   It is no coincidence that Comey was appointed as FBI Director in 2013 by Obama, and the same year appointed as Director of HSBC bank holdings. In fact, HSBC created a new committee just for this position, Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee, whose primary focus was ‘risk management’, i.e., preventing money laundering, terrorist financing, and ‘intelligence’. Whoa Nelly – OUCH!  Conflict of Interest?

  1. HSBC is a British company, having shut down it’s US finance arm in 2009
  2. HSBC was heavily involved in the Clinton Foundation.
  3. Theresa May’s husband works for a US investment fund, Capital Group, which closely advises HSBC.
  4. Capital Group lists one ‘private client’ – the US.

In 2012, HSBC was under a US Senate Investigation for money laundering, failure to conduct due diligence, suspicious activity reports, and inadequate and unqualified staffing and leadership.   Their hand was slapped and they were fined $1.9 billion which represented roughly 10% of their 2011 profit.  Shortly thereafter Comes is appointed to Director of FBI and simultaneously as the Director for HSBC ‘risk management’.

In 2016 two HSBC executives were charged with a $3.6 billion currency scheme which defrauded HSBC clients and manipulated the foreign exchange market.  These executives had clients who contributed generously to the Clinton Foundation.

Today HSBC is involved in an investigation brought by Belgium authorities again for  money laundering through their support of clients in the lucrative and unsavory diamond business involving numerous mega-wealthy individuals.

It would appear their new and improved risk management Committee with Comey as Director was not terribly effective…  Or maybe it was.

Obviously, the Swamp has extended its tentacles across the Atlantic into a UK partnership.

What is the Soros HSBC connection?

In 2003, with a shove and a push from Soros, Tony Blair created EITI, Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which monitors all the resources in Africa – including the diamond industry.  In 2006 Soros was appointed as governing secretariat.  Under the Soros arm of Global Witness, Soros basically took control of the diamond industry, and is thus the Kingman behind ‘blood diamonds’ creating massive wars, deaths, and resource grabs in Africa.  In 2011, Soros backed, RITC Syndicate Management, bought the insurance division of HSBC.

Just prior to the appointment of Comey as the Director of the new HSBC risk management committee, HSBC and the Clinton Foundation were discovered to have profited upwards of $81 million in ‘donations’ that flowed from money laundered accounts at HSBC to the Clinton Foundation, which included the Chagoury family of Nigeria who purportedly pledged $1 billion.  Chagoury fled arrest in Nigeria for purported implication in bribery, and helping the former President of Nigeria and his family stash solen funds from the government in the amount of $66 million.

The Clinton Foundation was never charged in the HSBC money laundering scandal, while the two HSBC executives were arrested.

Where was Comey?

Most likely cutting a deal to become the wealthy co-conspirator…2013.  Presently, Comey’s net worth is estimated to be in the $15 million range, although given his tenure at USBC, where money laundering “was” historically flagrant, his true worth is questionable.

 

And so we are led down a path of lies, leaks, fraud, money laundering, and more, with James Comey appearing to follow in the footsteps of Willy Loran – while Comey is quite alive, his reputation, his integrity, his respect and his leadership have seemingly come to a very dark death.

London’s Khan vs Trump: Drain The Swamp!

The feud between London’s Muslim mayor and Trump is expanding exponentially. The central point of the argument is the benefits vs the detriments of immigration on the economy. But the bullets within the point are not being truthfully described and analyzed. First, Trump is NOT against ‘immigration’, he is against terrorism and against those countries that advocate terrorism. His choice as the US President is to ‘LIMIT’ some immigrants who desire to come into the US a) illegally, and b)   with the intent of committing a terrorist act.

The argument takes on a perverse nature when the actual facts are distorted. Immigrants come from a wide variety of countries. They come legally, get jobs and pay taxes. Then we have illegal immigrants and we have potential terrorists who are also defined as ‘immigrants’.

We need to compare apples to apples instead of apples to wood.

In the UK, estimates peg the number of foreign born immigrants at about 13% of the population – actual numbers aren’t known because the government does not have a census. So it is a – guess.

BaddaBing!  The US has about 13.5-14% immigrants!  Sorry Khan…

In the UK, the increase in immigration between 2001 and 2015 has an interesting statistic. The largest increase has been from Poland. Interestingly, the Middle East does not represent a large, if any, increase in immigration whereas France, US, Pakistan, India and China have a significant increase.  This would correspond with Mayor Khan’s statement that the UK is open to a wide variety of immigrants, but it does not address the real issue – again, terrorism.

Nor does it address –illegal immigration.

Nor does it address the cost benefit thereof.

Reviewing past articles from 2013 and 2014, the UK was embroiled in a host of charges that they were ‘neglecting’ to report the real immigration statistics by a large margin. These miscalculations came under the heading of – David Cameron. Of course this was all a very innocent mistake… to the tune of over 350,000 during the period 2001 to 2011.

The top sending countries into the US have consistently been; Mexico, India, China, Philippines, Cuba, and Dominican Republic. That means that placing a temporary ban on specific Middle Eastern Countries would be a very, very small figure. And hardly worth all the media attention. When the fact, the purpose, and the effect is all about the reduction of potential terrorism, and the elimination of illegal entry.

From an economic standpoint, in the UK it is ‘estimated’ that 53% of Muslim men and 76% of Muslim women don’t work. About 24% claim disability. So, the rhetoric pounded by mayor Khan claiming that immigrants are a benefit to society, it may be an actual correct statement, it just doesn’t address the core point – Islamic terrorists, and illegals?   The argument again digresses into a war of propaganda, instead of a war of facts.

In addition, according to The Independent in the UK, Muslims claim to be subjected to the worst discrimination of any other minority… which makes Khans’s embracing statements rather false…

Statistic show that Muslim men were less likely to be employed than ‘white Christian British ‘ men… What a ridiculous claim. What were their qualifications? What was their experience? What was their knowledge of the language? What was their education? The absurdity of such baseless statistics is criminal.

Okay – the guy who speaks no English, has no education, has no experience, and hates all British citizens with a vengeance – has a less likely chance of getting the same job as a … fill in the blanks…

The report goes on to claim that they/Muslims are perceived as ‘disloyal and a threat’ – as in, I wonder why?

Of course, let us reiterate, these reports are based on the climate of immigration in the Mayor Khan’s – UK. Not the Trump’s US.

Research has the valuable import of pulling up historical information and integrating that into the political agenda so as to coordinate what is Truth. Unfortunately, many within our media, instead prefer to articulate a false statistic based on a pre-conceived end product.

Khan would be better informed to know the facts before spouting and pointing fingers, he only reveals his own ignorance. And Theresa May, she needs to stop being a politician and start being a human being, because as one of my followers has pointed out – she is looking more and more like – The Swamp.

 

Quick FYI:  The illegal immigration population in the UK is estimated to be about .4%.  The US illegal population is estimated to be about 3.5%.  Apples to – wood…

UK Election – Socialism Rising

While the press is diligently trampling Trump and staging fake news sets, an election in the UK has been slighted. Theresa May’s lead against Socialist, Jeremy Corbyn, has narrowed precipitously over the last month. Why is this important? To put it into perspective, a Corbyn win would be like a Bernie Sanders win… a complete reversal of policies and the institution of communist/socialism.

Surprisingly, the press is quite silent.

Corbyn supports vacating BREXIT. He is anti-capitalism, pro-globalization, and pro-immigration, as in they are just misunderstood and angry – give them a hug…   A Corbyn election win would derail relations with the US, and give the Soros agenda quite a boost in having control over the EU with France, Germany and the UK aligned.

An interesting viewpoint from the off-Guardian, suggests that a Corbyn win is a CIA decision, reuniting the EU, thus making them a pawn of the US and easier to rule as a single unit. That may have been the case under an Obama empire or a Hillary queendom, but the rules and the game have changed, shifted. And a united EU is more aligned with a Soros agenda –    Upon further investigation, the article was written by a woman connected to “True Publica” which has been cited as a Green organization with a bent toward leftist anarchist views.  It is another propaganda machine created in 2002 with the intent of subliminally altering opinion.

AKA, Soros.

For the article, the off-Guardian presents a photo of Corbyn which is somewhat telling as he seems to take a Hail Caesar posture.   Praise is lavished upon his ideologies, and the same mechanics of media exploitation of Hillary comes to mind. The photo is reminiscent of those of Obama with a golden halo behind his head…

Security concerns and the ISIS attacks are named as the apparent drivers of the election schism.   David Cameron’s advisor is asking May to step down and relinquish her post. Sounds decidedly similar to the impeachment screams coming from Maxine Waters in her bid for Trump to ‘stand down’.

The US and UK media is decidedly anti-May and Pro-Corbyn, which also would suggest that the manipulation and propaganda are hard at work to tilt the election.

So, what if Corbyn is elected, how could that skew the global political personalities?

With the EU firmly tied to a Socialist agenda, and the support of greater immigration, they would in effect be creating their own internal destruction. The US and some of the Eastern European countries would be isolated and left to ‘choose sides’, not just politically, but economically as well. The alternate side being – Russia.

Asian countries would come under the mercy of China, the EU would become a defacto subdivision of the Middle East, and Canada, under Trudeau, would align with the EU. South America has been nearly completely destabilized and therefore has no position, and Africa remains a common ground of war. The point of the game is to create ever larger ‘units’ in order to ultimately align all units into the Globalization super power.

For the UK, bringing it to it’s knees was the back to back ISIS attacks…  Conveniently crafted during the one month before the election.

France’s election of Macron, the Rothschild poster boy, was a coup. But if Corbyn were to win the UK, the entire world map will shift.

And yet, the media is oddly silent. The stage is set, the actors are playing their parts, and we have entered into Act III without the audience ever having attended the play, the auditorium is empty.  

The election is in play, and nary a whisper…

Paris Climate Agreement: SHAMEFUL SHAM

Does anyone know exactly what the Paris Climate Agreement says? Because, if you are like me – the answer is “No”.

So, I decided to read/skim through the Agreement in order to see what all the fuss is about:

  1. It utilizes words like ‘aim’ and ‘goal’ quite a bit to define its terms.
  2. It seems to address catastrophic events quite a bit, which would be more like a universal FEMA.
  3. As with all good intentions, so far, the US is one of only a spattering of countries that has actually anted any money via cash and/or commitment, amounting to about 1/3 of the total so far.
  4. In fact, France, US and Japan are the ONLY developed countries that have put their money where their mouth is.
  5. As with all such contracts, the UN, in all their bloated transparency, would be the ‘accountant’ and ‘distributor’ of funds.
  6. Every nation’s aim or goal is not subject to any legal requirement at all, the only legal requirement is that each country report their progress.
  7. The ‘emission cut targets for 2016’ were 3’, verses the 2’ required by the Agreement, so right off the assembly line, it reports a failure rate of 50%.
  8. Bottom line – everything is ‘voluntary’ – no incentive, no consequence.
  9. Everybody ‘should’ cooperate, everybody ‘should ‘share’, everybody ‘should’ be transparent…and nice.   Sounds like a Kindergarten lesson plan.
  10. And this one is scary! “The Conference of the Parties, the supreme body of the Convention, shall serve as the meeting of the Parties to this Agreement.”

“Supreme Body”, sounds like a Communist takeover.

Aims and goals can be funny things from a purely business standpoint. Imagine the Saudi’s wrote a contract with Boeing to provide $5 billion in aerospace and military equipment. They would aim to pay at the time of delivery. They take delivery and decide their aim was not realistic and so they defer payment for another 25 years…

That’s what an aim looks like in the business world, and that’s why this Paris Agreement is worthless.

In addition, there are three parties that have not signed, 2 of which the media notates regularly, Syria and Iraq. The third is The Holy See.

Of the 195 countries signing the Agreement, 20 are responsible for a greater than 1% contribution to the global emissions with China, the EU and the US representing about 48%.  That means, that the combined largest polluters are going to raise more than $100 billion annually to fund a bunch of UN jobs to oversee the money and distribute it to countries that have little to no effect on global emissions.  What the HEY?

That is our UN hard at work!

The Agreement further denotes ‘Capacity Building’. Meaning the UN and developed countries will ‘enhance’ developing countries to take action to change the effects of climate change on their ‘Party country’.

Sounds like a global initiative to come in the backdoor and take control of a country, telling them what to do, how, where and why, when the country isn’t even contributing to climate change in the first place…

Fishy is as Fishy does.

Appears more likely that the Paris Agreement is a detractor cover for a global seizure of small countries so as to incorporate them into the larger country – the UN because it has nothing to do with ‘climate’ and everything to do with building out these smaller countries so that they can be mined and owned.   Like the African Land Grabs – only on a global scale.

Merkel is Whining…

“Vladamir Putin has been longing to drive a wedge between the US and Germany.”   That’s the headlines. And that’s the take away. As though Merkel had absolutely no brain, no power, no heart – The Wizard of Oz won…

Really? Because doesn’t that make Merkel look like an idiot? A patsy? Someone who caved and is not a viable leader? Isn’t the press giving Putin the power by continuing to claim – He Won?

I’m sure he considers that press rather flattering… Merkel caved – Merkel Lost – and Putin Won. Is this the backdoor Soros – who never liked Merkel – actually bringing her down? Once again? Because, it sure sounds like the media is hailing Putin as being a much more savvy leader.

Today Merkel is quoted as saying, “…we Europeans must really take our destiny into our own hands.” And my take is – why do you perceive that to be a negative? Isn’t that what every country is supposed to do – as opposed to letting someone else make all your decisions for you…? And maybe that is the rub. Maybe Germany has been run by someone else all these years and really doesn’t have a clue how to run itself.

The German Socialist, Schulz, is even worse claiming that Trump is an ‘authoritarian ruler’ because he won’t cave to their rule, which of course, is authoritarian… because Socialism is arguably defined by authoritarianism.

So, did Putin win? And if he did, what did he win?

The Democrats would like to infer that Putin won the US by the election of Trump. They would like to say that he won the UK by and through BREXIT. And now, they say he has won Germany by Merkel’s admittance of defeat.   And all these wins occurred after the US attempted to destroy the economy of Russia by tanking oil and levying sanctions.  “How’s that working for ya”…

What really went wrong?

Once again, it goes back to picking the wrong allies and the wrong enemies. In WWII, Russia was an ally. In battling the Middle East, we picked the wrong allies. In Brazil, we have now failed miserably as our choice for President to replace our choice for impeachment, is yanked from office in a mire of corruption and the country collapses into a death spiral. Venezuela – ditto. Syria – ditto. Ukraine – ditto.   Libya – ditto. Egypt – ditto.

The choices made have proven to be ‘wrong’ each and every time. And yet, we refuse to admit or accept these mistakes. That failure to admit merely serves to heighten the consequence, the lack of respect and the disillusionment of We The People.

Who made all these crazy choices?   Well, we actually can’t put all the blame on Obama, Bush was complicit, as was Billy, as was Bushy, as was even – Carter. It traverses both parties in a failed intelligence division that was either miserably incompetent, or planned our demise with intent. Either – is equally ugly.

And the ONLY way to mitigate this – DRAIN THE SWAMP!