Pesticide Peril – not for the faint of heart

Germany’s flagship company, Bayer, is facing 18,400 lawsuits, predominantly from California whereby their subsidiary, Monsanto, has been cited for its toxic, cancer causing pesticide, glyphosate.   Bayer bought Monsanto for $63 billion one year ago and today Bayer’s total market value is less than what it paid for just Monsanto with it’s stock plummeting 50%. While Bayer claims that there is absolutely nothing wrong with the chemical, they are fast-tracking an alternative.

There are 26 countries that ban or restrict the use of Monsanto products including: Germany, China, India, France, Hungary, Austria, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Poland, Luxembourg and Mexico.   The four largest pesticide companies in the world are: Syngenta, owned by China – the world leader of agro-chemicals, Bayer, headquartered in Germany, DOW, headquartered in Michigan, and BASF, also headquartered in Germany  (they purchased Monsanto’s seed division).

In the US alone 851 million pounds of pesticides are used annually.   90% of private wells sourced by groundwater contain pesticides. The contamination results in 14 million fish deaths, 67 million bird deaths and 20,000 new cancer patients each year.

The most prolific user of pesticides is China at 4 trillion pounds per year. Obviously their ban of Monsanto is purely a business decision and not an environmental one.

The top consumers in order of pounds: China, US, Argentina, Thailand, Brazil, Italy, France, Canada, Japan, and India.   The impact on the smaller countries is significantly more hazardous given the concentration levels.

Glyphosate is not the only banned chemical that is showing up in our food chain, paraquat and chlorpyrifos which are banned in the EU are a common supplement to Brazils exports including wheat, soy, cotton, dairy products, coffee, tea, eggs and beef. YUM!  But chlorpyrifo’s are the brainchild of DOW and used for insect control on citrus fruits, wheat, corn, cotton, soybeans and sugar beets in the US.   They are NOT banned in the US despite serious potential side effects including:  vomiting, stomach cramps, muscle twitching, tremors, weakness, loss of coordination, unconsciousness, loss of bladder control, convulsions, difficulty breathing, paralysis and of course – death.

Farmers have lobbied for the continued use claiming they stand to lose up to 70% of their crop if insects are not controlled – and there is no alternative product. But, while they claim there is no alternative, that would be a false argument given that organic farming utilizes just that – alternatives.   It is not that their are no alternatives, it is that the alternatives make them non-competitive in the mass market.

Sometimes alternatives may be a predator insect, as in butterflies eat aphids, but as we are well aware, the cost of alternative farming exceeds the mass market and the competition for the general public.

Notable elite such as Bill Gates et all, Buffet, Zuckerberg, those with the means, negate anything mass produced and eat only organic.   While they advocate the use of chemical laden foods for feeding the world, they are wholly repugnant at the thought of consuming such for themselves or their families.

Starbucks coffee is imported from Brazil and Columbia. The term Arabica on the package refers to a type of plant, not a place.  So when you are choking down that latte, or espresso, or French Roast, know that you are drinking a hefty dose of yummy pesticides aka Latin America.  Brazil is known to have the highest per capita consumption of pesticides.

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, glyphosate causes cancer, most notably Hodgkins. Nerve damage is the other leading medical ailment associated with the chemical.

A California couple’s settlement award for glyphosate poisoning which was initially $2 billion was recently reduced to $87 million.   Still, given 18,400 separate lawsuits at an award rate of $80 million, that would amount to nearly $1.5 trillion.   At present, Bayer’s annual net is roughly $400 million, so that would wipe out all profits for about 4 years.

Agro companies, pharma companies, they have an agenda.   And it isn’t – health.  Let the buyer beware.  But let the buyer also be informed.

Warren Buffett Philanthropy Donates $3.6 billion – to Support Abortion

Warren Buffett continues to boast of his philanthropic agenda. Most recently he announced that he would again donate $3.6 billion to five charities that have benefited from him in the past:   Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Sherwood Foundation, NoVo Foundation, Howard G Buffett Foundation and Susan Thompson Foundation.   With the exception of the Gates Foundation, the other four are controlled by his children. In essence, he is transferring his estate without paying estate taxes…

The top estate tax rate is 40%.   By comparison, IRS rules for 501©(3) charitable distributions levies a minimum requirement of 5%.   If a foundation fails to distribute this 5% minimum an excise tax penalty will be assessed at 30%.

Buffett’s NoVo Foundation paid $5.153 million for ‘Consulting Services’ in 2017.   The largest recipient of such consulting fees was the Raben Group – $2.177 million. Clients for this organization have included; Open Society Foundation, United Nations Foundation, Gates Foundation, Arnold Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, etc…   Their primary purpose is to influence, mold, and lobby through government affairs, Mass Media, Entertainment, and through the creation of culture changing ‘movements’.

In 2014 The Howard Buffett Foundation gave $10 million to Catholic Relief Services.

Catholic Relief Services has been embroiled in criticism for violating its underlying ethical purpose, ie donating millions to finance contraception and abortion.  They have supported CARE International, which claims to be a charitable organization fighting ‘poverty’. However, in reality they are a major proponent of contraception and ‘climate change’ agendas. Other charities they have supported include CORE Group and MEDICAM – both advocating abortion and population control.

The Susan Buffett Foundation is worth over $2.7 billion.   Its largest grant was to MSI-US whose stated purpose is to provide abortion services – 2017 grant $47.9 million.   Other contributions include NAF – National Abortion Federation – $31.8 million. And Population Services International whose ambassadors include Ashley Judd and Debra Messing – $34.4 million. It’s most recent charity review by GiveWell stated that: “The evidence we have seen does not clearly show that PSI has the impact it intends” while at the same time praising PSI for “(a) focusing on programs with proven impact and (b) monitoring whether these programs are implemented effectively.”

Phil Harvey has been instrumental in many of these abortion organizations including Population Services International, CARE, DKT International and Marie Stone International. Marie Stone was infamously named in a lawsuit citing forced sterilization on women in Africa.  Harvey was instrumental in challenging President Reagan’s policy that disallowed NGO’s from receiving government grants for abortion as well as explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking. The policy was removed by President Bill Clinton in 1993, re-imposed by George W. Bush in 2001 and removed again by Barack Obama in 2009.

DKT International filed a lawsuit challenging the Reagan ruling. They were defeated. Then in 2013, the Alliance For Open Society International (George Soros) and Pathfinder jointly filed a lawsuit.  Chief Justice John Roberts declared that “the government cannot force a private organization to publicly profess a viewpoint that mirrors the government’s view but is not held by the organization itself.”

Despite many of these ‘sexual health’ NGO’s claiming they are working to prevent HIV, the number of infected people globally has steadily risen each year with statistics revealing that as of 2017 that number was approximately 37million – an increase of 30% since 2000.

While these NGO’s spend billions each year on abortion in order to reduce population, it is unusual that statistically HIV continues to increase despite thousands of NGO’s claiming they are eradicating it.

Abortions and HIV are not the only combatant:

TB is the leading cause of death among persons infected with HIV, it is also one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide.   According to the CDC, one fourth of the world’s population is infected with TB.   The TB vaccine is not recommended for adults because it is ineffective.   Antibiotic treatments are available but they are expensive and require a six month round of medication which can have severe side effects.

In the US 70% of all TB cases are attributed to non-citizens. The states with the highest rates of TB are California, Texas, New York, and Florida.   Since 1980, the rate of TB cases has more than doubled worldwide. In 2017, there were 10million new cases of TB and 1.6million deaths.   Globally, the highest instances of TB include India, China, Pakistan, and the Philippines.

While population control has been at the forefront of Bill Gates, it would also seem to be the primary focus of Warren Buffett and the various Foundations awarded his children. Of course, avoiding estate taxes would also seem to be his philanthropic venture having distributed $34 billion to his own Foundations since 2006. Given a 40% tax rate, he saved $13.6 billion – of course he encourages higher tax rates – claiming the rich won’t flee… but then most already have their offshore accounts in tax free havens, so what’s another $13 billion?

RACISM: Warren and Harris Blatant Disregard of Truth – Black Women Maternal Mortality

This past week Elizabeth Warren, a white feminist, and Kamal Harris, a Jamaican/Indian feminist, participated in a lecture at Texas University. The primary topic concerned the variance in mortality of black vs white women post delivery.   Both Warren and Harris agreed that the basic cause of this 300% disparity was “Racism”.  

According to Warren, this tragedy is completely the result of racial prejudice and all doctors and nurses across the US are guilty.   She cites the availability of insurance as a root cause.  Harris, in conjunction with John Podesta’s, Center for American Progress, advocate for a ‘committee’ to be formed to monitor data. The reason? Despite the data being stated as fact by the CDC, according to NIH, the US has not released maternal mortality rates since 2007. Therefore, we don’t really know…and the data collected by the CDC is based on estimates and maybes.

But it must be “Racism”.

Warren’s plan, based on unreleased data, is to introduce incentives; a doctor or nurse who saves the life of a black woman gets a bonus. Remember how the teacher’s unions fought like Banshees against the radical conservative idea of incentivizing teachers?   It was considered racist.  Well, obviously no one told Warren.

The problem with both Harris and Warren’s proposals is they have cherry-picked the data that is available, and omitted factual evidence:

Here is what they left out according to the National Partnership For Women and Familes:

  1. Black women are 3 times more likely to have fibroids at a very young age which can cause post-partum hemorrhaging.
  2. Black women have a much higher rate of ‘preeclampsia’ than white women, which left untreated can lead to high blood pressure and death.
  3. Black women experience physical ‘weathering’ at a much faster rate than white women, meaning their bodies age faster, meaning they are higher risk.
  4. 75% of Black women deliver at hospitals that cater predominantly to blacks. These hospitals are considered ‘inferior’ and staffed by black physicians and nurses – so the race card is completely false.
  5. Black women are less likely to even seek out pre-delivery care for themselves and do not alter lifestyle choices.
  6. Black women have a significantly higher rate of unintended pregnancies, which may be complicated by drug use and alcohol use. (the solution according to the paper – more abortions).
  7. Many Black women live in abject poverty and do NOT have good health, good diets, and therefore create a harmful environment during and after pregnancy.

No amount of doctor and nurse incentivizing will have one hoot on these outcomes. But racism is the Democrat mantra feeding false information and fake news to a society that believes that all white people are the wrecking ball and generalizations are ‘unfair’… because they create division.

Election 2020 has begun!

In the midst of the New York Times posting extremely anti-Semitic cartoons depicting Netanyahu in a very negative way, the New York Times posts an article titled: A Rising Tide of Anti-Semitism. “In 2016 we saw a 34% increase over the prior year in acts of harassment, vandalism, or violence directed at Jewish individuals and institutions. During the first three quarters of 2017, there was a 67% increase over the same period in 2016. We’ve seen double the number of incidents in K-12 schools, and almost a 60% increase on college campuses.”

US Democrats have increasingly voiced anti-Semitic views, voted against Israel, and still the vast majority of Jewish people in the US vote Democrat.   Time and again it has been shown that most US Jewish people identify themselves according to a culture, not a religion, and thus Israel is meaningless to them.

But the Racist and Anti-Semitic agenda’s have always been a radical ploy of the liberals in creating and propagandizing false information for political gain.

What Warren and Harris fail to address is the fact that Hispanics are the largest group to be uninsured, and yet have a lower maternal mortality rate than blacks – or whites.

In 2013, before Obamacare, the trend in US pregnancy mortality had risen from 7.2 in 1987, to 15.9 per 100,000. After Obamacare, as of 2018 that rate rose to 22. The insurance card was just obliterated.

We are left with two core causal factors;   1.   Black women are less likely to seek prenatal care, and 2.   Black women have health issues that create a mortality risk.   Neither Harris or Warren have advocated for these factors to be mitigated.   Thus both Warren and Harris are proposing solutions that will solve nothing and could therefore be considered ‘Racist’ given they are well aware of the true facts per the report issued by: National Partnership For Women and Families.   This organization is at the forefront of Obamacare, Planned Parenthood, and has a comprehensive list of Liberal speakers including; Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Madelaine Albright, Christiane Amanpour, Rosie O’Donnell etc…

Obviously given this very left-leaning report, the very left leaning Warren and Harris are aware of the true statistics…

US Healthcare – vs Health Insurance

An interesting query/comment was put before me today that sparked the need for a blog – Healthcare vs Health Insurance – as a mandate. How could a basic coverage plan work and still be fair?  

  1. Basic coverage would exclude prescriptions, cosmetic procedures, dental, vision, and ambulance services. Long term care would also not be covered.
  2. Individuals making less than a specified amount, lets say $50,000 per year, would pay into the system a percentage of their gross income. All others would pay a progressive flat fee with a cap. Tiers for family’s would be progressive up to a maximum of two children per couple. All couple’s with more than two children would pay a flat fee for each successive child.
  3. Insurance company’s would no longer be the middleman unless someone wanted supplemental insurance coverage through an independent private insurance company.
  4. In order to access coverage an insurance card would be issued to each individual including children, with a picture updated annually.
  5. Medicaid and all forms within that conversation would be eliminated.
  6. Servicemen would be covered with the military picking up the cost 100% for any member earning below a threshold – say $50,000.
  7. The VA would be eliminated.
  8. Congress would NOT vote on the proposal, instead a vote would be made by all legal taxpayers, their status verified via a comparable analysis of Social Security numbers within the IRS computer system.
  9. In order to make this work over the long haul, the entire government pension system would be – eliminated. This would be voted on by taxpayers, not Congress.
  10. The government would fix the value of services.
  11. The cost of prescription drugs would be tied to a global mean amount so that US citizens are no longer subsidizing the world’s cost.
  12. Medicare would remain intact.

Currently, the federal government spends $1.1 trillion for healthcare, $583 billion for Medicare over receipts, and $430 billion for all other healthcare. Individuals cough up an additional $2.4 trillion per year. Of course this includes the average annual expenditure of Hollywoodites requiring $500k of plastic surgery per year, so the number has some skew room.

It is estimated that the US spends about $12,000 per year for each person on healthcare. That is double the next developed countries output.   That would indicate that the US spending could be cut in half from $3.5 trillion to $1.75 trillion which includes ‘Hollywood excesses’.

However, simple averages in healthcare spending do not necessarily reflect true cost:

According to Kaiser, “In 2016, 5% of the population accounted for half of all health spending. The 5% of people who spend the most on health care spend an average of around $50,000 annually; people in the top 1% have average spending of over $109,750. At the other end of the spectrum, the 50% of the population with the lowest spending accounted for only 3% of all total health spending; the average spending for this group was $276.”

Even when comparing spending for people over the age of 65, 10% of that population accounted for 50% of the spending. People with a prior diagnosis of a disease spend upwards of 300% more than those currently diagnosed. And spending costs for those over the age of 65 is 2-3 times greater than those aged 35-45.

Between 2010 and 2016, Health insurers saw an increase in revenue from Medicare and Medicaid surging from $92.5 to $213 billion – an increase of 77% with the advent of Obamacare.   That income is mostly generated by taxing taxpayers to pay for the splurging costs incurred by those who have no wage, illegals, and/or welfare recipients.

As of 2017, the top six executives at United Healthcare raked in $1.75 billion in compensation.

In 2017, the US national gross income was roughly $19.6 trillion. From a simplistic standpoint, even an 8% tax levy on all gross income would pay for the entire healthcare costs assuming the above reductions in cost put the total annual cost on par with developed countries. If Trump’s tax overhaul were to bring back to the US income that is currently untaxable in foreign off-shore accounts, the flat percentage would be even lower.

How did Health Insurance even arrive in the US?

The brainchild result of FDR’s policies, insurance was invoked because FDR levied price and wage controls that stagnated capitalism in the employment industry.   In order to provide a benefit that another employer did not, so as to encourage a higher tiered worker, companies opened Pandora’s Box for the Insurance scheme.

Founded in 1929, Blue Cross and Blue Shield was the brainchild of Democrat Justin Ford Kimball.   As VP of health care facilities in Dallas Texas, the recipients were teachers who were guaranteed 21 days of hospital care per year for $6.   The tax exempt status of Blue Cross helped achieve increased costs.   At the time, it is estimated that the above average wage earner spent roughly 2%-3% of their income on healthcare.   Most people utilized friends, neighbors, midwives, Indian medicine, herbal cures, etc…

Eliminating the Middleman is key to lowering healthcare costs.   Obamacare did the opposite, it made more money for the Insurance Industry while enslaving the worker and businesses to an ever burgeoning cost that is now double any other industrialized country in the world.

Double. Let that sink in.

Simply rolling back Obamacare will NOT have the reduced cost effect that is necessary to bring the healthcare of the US to par.   And while this is not Medicare for all, or Universal coverage, it is an elimination of a middleman that has profited serendipitously at the expense of you and I.

My annual percentage is now over 20% of gross income.

PELOSI: White Suffragists… Left Abortionists

The Women in White at the SOTUS event would like to claim that they are simply “Suffragettes” fighting for the rights of women against Trump, who they claim represents their demon.  While the Suffragettes wore white ‘on occasion’, it was also a symbol of the KKK, and the pedophile, rapist, faith healer John of God who demanded everyone who entered his temple of healing in Abadiania, Brazil wear only white. 

The Suffragettes of the US and Uk in early 1900’s had one calling demand, the right to vote.  There were two factions, both included only white women, one faction employed radical, chaotic means, and the other faction promoted peaceful protest and written appeals.   The militant suffragettes used physical violence, arson, and damage to support their cause which ultimately led to hurting the Liberal Party’s reputation and losing their cause.   When WWI began, the movement was tabled completely as women focused on the war effort.  It wasn’t until four years after WWI that suffrage was partially granted by the UK to women over 30 and not until 1928 that all women were granted the right to vote.  In the US the right was granted in 1920 under then President Wilson.  Wilson was bedridden as of October 1919 due to a severe stroke which greatly affected his health and mental acuity.  His wife, Edith, became the defacto ‘president’ and the granting of the power to the right to vote was likely her doing.

Since the abolition of the Suffrage Movement, women have appealed for a variety of rights including ‘reproductive rights’.   It is this right that is frequently quoted as the bain of Trump and all conservatives, and the squeal of all Spocialists and Liberals.   The World Health Organization defines reproductive rights as follows:

Reproductive rights rest on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health. They also include the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence.”

Nowhere in this definition is ‘abortion’ defined as ‘reproduction’, because it quite simply isn’t a part of the act of reproduction.

When and where did abortion gain traction?

Interestingly, it was introduced in Russia during WWI with the Bolshevik Revolution.   Under Bolshevik rule, Russia became the first country in human history to provide free abortions in state run hospitals as of October 1920.  In the US, Socialist Margaret Sanger has been labeled the mother of abortion as she was the founder of Planned Parenthood.  In fact, it was Mary Calderone, a physician who worked at PP in the 1950’s, who advocated for abortion, sex education for children as young as 5, and sexual promiscuity earning her the award as Humanist Of The Year by The American Humanist Association in 1974.  Her husband, Frank Calderone, was chief administrative officer at the World Health Organization.  The American Humanist Association is a non-profit that advocates secularism and advances the concept of ‘the greater good’ which is a Socialist/Communist meme.  Its past president, David Niose has been a writer and blogger for Psychology Today, Washington Post, BBC, Salon and Huffington Post.

Neither Sanger or Calderone actually conducted abortions at Planned Parenthood.

It wasn’t until 1970 when then Planned Parenthood president, Alan Guttmacher, opened the first legal abortion facility in New York.  The facilities were called abortoriums.   As the president of The Eugenics Society, Guttmacher’s primary concern dealt with a means to correct over-population.  Prior to the legalization of abortion, Planned Parenthood had about 42 centers, however, with legal application the number of facilities jumped to 100 with Ellen Fairchild and Dr. Jeff Penfield having the ‘honor’ of conducting the first legal abortions for Planned Parenthood. Their goal was to perform 100,000 per year in New York City.

The initial funding came from the Rockefellers, The Scaife Mellon Trust, and an anonymous donor.   But it wasn’t long before government funding from Health and Human Services was added to the burgeoning budget in 1971 by Richard Nixon under the premise that government funds would not be allocated to abortion, but instead to family planning and birth control.  Today, Bill Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Buffett Foundation and the Turner Foundation make sure abortions are liberally covered.

During the Obama tenure, Planned Parenthood received tremendous grants from the government with the caveat that they help promote Obamacare.   Follow The Money.  And despite finding that Planned Parenthood was indeed selling human body parts, the courts under Obama and the Socialist Liberals determined that it was not illegal because they did not make a profit.  Within their non-profit 501©(3) status, they are prohibited from spending funds on any political campaign.  Not to be deterred, they simply set up a PAC, fund it liberally, and spend upwards of $6-$7 million per year on Democrat candidates.

Ironically, sitting Chair for Planned Parenthood is Joe Solmonese, former president of Human Rights Campaign.   Cecile Richards, formerly Deputy Chief of Staff to Nancy Pelosi is a former president of Planned Parenthood, and current president, Leana Wen, who served as a fellow for World Health Organization and The Department of Defense, and like David Niaose, Wen blogs for Psychology Today and the Huffington Post.

In essence, this is the white Suffragist Movement of the Nancy Pelosi Party today – a party that feels they represent ‘all women’ and wear the KKK white to prove their solidarity and female nationalism, rooted in Bolshevik Ideology – Socialism – Eugenics – De-Population – Secular Stoicism – and Sexual promiscuity.

OPIOID CRISIS

The opioid pain crisis is in a backlash as doctors and prescribers cut to zero.  Suddenly, Trump is to blame.  Legitimate patients are in agony, some committing suicide, and the medical community is silent.  What the heck just happened?

In 2016, when Obama was still in office, he was called to find a solution to the advancing rate of illegal opioid use and curb the drug overdosing mania.   At Obama’s counsel, the CDC issued what they termed as a proposal, or a guideline to restrict prescriptions that had become commonplace for the unnecessary treatment of patients.   While the CDC says this was a proposal and never a law or regulation, the medical industry caved and felt their personal licensing risk meant – all or nothing.  Many simply shut down the window.

But that isn’t what the CMS has proposed for Medicare and Medicaid at all.   They have implemented the following:  1.  Imposed a restricted 7 day only prescription for a patient’s ‘first’ prescription thereby requiring the doctor to have a follow-up with the patient to see if continuation of opioids is medically necessary.   2.  Certain chronic conditions are exempt.  3.   If your plan determines you are getting multiple drugs from different pharmacies and doctors, the plan has the right to verify with the doctors that they approve.

The purpose is not to eliminate opioids, it is to eliminate the catastrophic crisis of illegal use that kills thousands each year.  Between 2013 and 2017, the overdose death rates among opioid users increased from roughly 20,000 to over 49,000 per year.  In 2017 the total number of drug overdose deaths rose to 72,000.

Last time I was hospitalized, they refused to allow me to leave without taking an oral opioid and a prescription to fill.  I can’t take them, nor did I want to take them, but given the hospital ‘policy’, I was required to have my doctor and the hospital administration waive the requirement in order to effectuate my discharge.  The ‘red tape’ was ridiculous to NOT have to take opioids.

I have witnessed an illegal addict cold turkey his addiction.  I have watched as a good friend became addicted thinking it would never happen to her.

But the pill popping crisis in the US is not just about opioids, it is about a quick fix.  It is psychological.   I am reminded of Gracie Slick of the Jefferson Airplane; one pill to make you taller…go ask Alice…”   Twenty five percent of American women are on an antidepressant.  17% on antibiotics, and 13% on Opioids.   In 1999, 40% of Americans took some medication, in 2017, 70% were taking medications.   80% of the global opioid supply is consumed in the US.   Of those who take prescription drugs, 53% get them from more than one provider.   In 2014, 1.3 million people required emergency care for a medical issue related to prescription drug use.   The US ranks #1 in the world for annual drug related deaths per 1million population, followed by Estonia, Norway, Ireland and Sweden.  Those ARE the statistics!

The medical industry certainly needs to take the lion’s share of the blame.  After all it is a “Prescription”!   Pills are largely a band-aide, while some patients have no alternative, others have become the unwitting victim of an industry that has lost sight of the word ‘cure’.

When my oncologist was telling me the medication he was prescribing, I asked what were the side effects.  He laughed, thought it was funny, and told me not to worry they had pills for side effects and more pills to combat the side effects from the medications that were curing the side effects.   When I asked where does it end?  He thought that was funny too,  “some of my patients take 13 to 15 pills a day just to find the right balance to medicate the side effects” of the initial pill that was supposed to cure you but has since proven to be largely ineffective.  ARGHHH –

I walked.

But that is the mentality the rules are attempting to dissuade.   If the doctor refuses to prescribe at all, sue the doctor because they are under an obligation to prescribe according to each individual need and there is no law that states a person in need of opioids will get – none.

The pharma industry requires a certain consistent number of patient/victims to buy their drugs in order for them to produce them profitably.   Opioids simply became the dejeurre drug to cure all that ails their pocket book and then some.     While Trump signed a ban on gag pricing by pharmacists on drugs October of this year, Democrats were in opposition.   Each of these Democrats received significant funding from the pharma industry, including Cory Booker.  NO agenda there…

If you look at it from a taxpayer standpoint:   The pharma industry that is virtually supported by US taxpayers, like the UN, over-charges the same US taxpayers for drugs, and spickets an advertising and political contribution campaign aligned with – higher US taxpayer funding and Democrat candidates willing to sell their souls.   We are funding the same pharma industry that gouges us more than any other nation.  Like – the – UN.  At the same time, the same pharma industry is using our money to pay off Democrat politicians to gouge us further while lining their pockets.

And no one peeps.

Bottom line.   If someone is not receiving their opioid prescription because their doctor is balking, that has nothing to do with any law or regulation, and has a lot to do with a corrupt doctor fearful for themselves without compassion for their patient.

The Media, The Mind, and The Propagation of Lies

A man in New York throws his four year old brother from the roof of their apartment building – killing him. A man pushes another man off a bridge nearly killing him.  A man sets a girl on fire, killing her.   According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, 20% of all adult people in the US experience mental illness in any given year…   And 1 in 25 adults experiences severe mental illness in any given year.   That equates to 10 million people capable of severe mental actionable cause, and 44 million potentially falling victim to their mental aberration in any given year.  

And no one seems to find this particular statistic relevant to the cock-eyed craziness that we read about daily from men masturbating on airplane flights, to maga hat eruptions, to the idea that ridiculing someone in a public restaurant is not ‘bullying’.

To the people yet to be victimized, they view it as television, a computer game, something foreign, benign, not of their world.   But to the victims, it can be devastatingly traumatic.

I’m not talking a grope, 36 years ago, or a construction worker saying, ‘nice a**’ forty years ago, that no one even gave a second thought to.  I’m talking about NOW.  Today.  The heinous actions by out of control people who might qualify as ‘mentally ill’.

Define Mental Illness. Interestingly, it is actually quite vague:  

  1. any of various disorders in which a person’s thoughts, emotions, or behaviour are so abnormal as to cause suffering to himself, herself, or other people.

This would apply to just about anyone who hurts another due to their own inability to ‘feel’ outside of self.

  1. a mental condition marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, and emotions to seriously impair the normal psychological and often social functioning of the individual.

This begs the question, ‘what is normal’?  Because according to what is now acceptable, a person may harass, slander, libel, lie, cheat, swindle, threaten, and scream obscenely, and no one considers this behavior – abnormal.  These people freely employ these behaviors and if we challenge this, we are either racist, judgmental, crossing the line of freedom of speech, or a host of other justifications.

According to psychology definitions, normal can be either what is normal for that particular person, as in Kathy Griffin, or normal for society as in …  hmmm?

In other words, normal no longer exists.  All ne need do is use Kathy Griffin as evidence of that fact, and attest to her ability to say, do, and walk freely, and in this regard, there is no abnormal. Except that psychologists assert that 20% of us are ‘abnormal’.

But no one goes to jail for being abnormal or mentally ill, instead, they are ignored because the line or boundary of definition is so vague that should we put away one – we would put away the many.  Really?

But it gets even more interesting.

In 2012, there were just 35,000 people in state mental institutions, and 356,000 in jails who were considered to have severe mental illness.   Roughly 400,000 are incarcerated in some way!  WOW!  Until you measure that to the statistics.   400,000 out of 44 million – less than 1%.   That leaves 43 million 600,000 still on the streets committing their abnormal acts.

Another statistic:  Our prison population is roughly 1.6 million.  Of those 356,000 are considered mentally insane.   25%!   Yet they are not labeled so.  They are not wearing a badge.   And they are not treated as mentally ill.  Why?  Because after the hubrub of the 1950’s enormous failures in psychiatric methodologies, it was determined that there was no cure – nothing was successful.  Nothing.

Not drugs.  Not magic.  Not incantations.  Not hallucinations.  Not talk. Nothing.

And so, they decided to alter the definition of mental illness, ‘what is not normal for the person’, which in reality is so broad that it can encompass – everything is ok!  As in Kathy Griffin.  It is all normal – for her.  If a person has been setting fire to cats all their life, that is ‘their norm’.

While our jail system is undeniably broken, as we are subjected to mass shootings, political propaganda, and devious sexual assault allegations, it is also true that the mentally insane are gaining traction in creating chaos and in instigating division.  It just isn’t coming from where we are led to believe when the media opens it’s mouth and the tongue wags a tale of deception.  The deceit is a tool of brainwashing, of constantly indoctrinating the mind to believe a statement when in fact it is a blatant lie.

And so we are left wit dissemination, the process of digging and churning up the dirt to find what is real beneath the layers of media dung that we have been subjected to for upwards of 60 years!   It takes a strong person to wish to see, and an even stronger person to hold onto the sight.  It ain’t easy.  But then, no one promised it would be – except – the media.

France Charges Marin Le Pen with Mental Illness! Politicizing Psychiatry

France has figured out how to guarantee a political party victory!   Relentlessly attack the opposing parties leader, charge her with the crime of racism when she posts images of ISIS beheading people, concoct a malfeasance charge that could land her in jail, black all her campaign funding right before an election and the piece de resistance – order her to get a psyche evaluation!  The premise for the psyche?  She is Islamaphobic because of her rhetoric regarding immigration.

Marin Le Pen stands to disappear into the bowels of a psyche ward where release is not an option. Where she could be detained and confined for an indeterminent period of time as psychiatrists evaluate her mental stability.

This horror means that a person’s stance on politics is grounds for a mental psychiatric pronouncement. This is not a ‘threat’ this has been ordered by a judge.

We saw the same threat made against Trump by online Liberal Psychiatrists who claimed they could evaluate him without knowing him, but by observing him on television.  Not only did the statements disappear, but the profession was made a mockery by this wholly unprofessional unethical pronouncement.

Has the psychiatric industry gone bonkers?

According to psychiatry.org, a mental illness is likely if:  a person has a change in appetite, a person’s sleep habits change, a person’s mood changes, problems thinking, increased sensitivity, apathy, feeling disconnected, illogical thinking, and the all encompassing – unusual behavior.

And you don’t have to experience all of these feelings – just one or two and you may have a mental illness.

I imagine all these behaviors could be applied to nearly every politician, if not every living person on the planet at some point, including the psychiatrists.   But despite an ethic’s violation, this methodology was attempted against Trump in 2017.  Led by psychologist, John Gartner, his Twitter account reflects his own psychotic fixation with everything anti-Donald Trump.

How did Gartner and others defy Section 7 of the American Psychiatric Association principles of ethics?  They claimed they were not members of that organization and thus not bound by ethics, instead they copped another organization as their grantor, The American Psychological Association.   This association has no ethics clause.  And so their members are free to make any derogatory statement they please without consideration.   The current President of APA is Jessica Henderson Daniel, a vocal opponent of Trump and Trump policies.  As a black woman, her particular passion is empowering young black girls.  And while they have an upcoming conference titled, “Civility”, it would appear that their members feel that civil response is one sided – everyone else needs to exercise this norm – unless of course they are discussing – Trump.

APA’s CEO, Arthur Evans Jr., has also ingratiated himself in the Trump administration’s appointment process by denouncing Gina Haspel as Trump’s pick for head of the CIA.  A black man, he was recognized by the Obama administration for his ‘endeavors’.

In 1964, the same tactic was attempted to bring down Barry Goldwater  when a magazine, Fact, sought to make psychological statements about his mental health claiming he was unfit for office.   The editors included Ralph Ginzburg whose claim to fame was publishing magazines with erotica that ultimately resulted in his conviction by the federal government for violation of obscenity laws.  The other editor, Warren Boroson claimed that the infamous article was actually written by an Israeli, David Bar-Illan.  Goldwater sued and the resulting suit triggered the ethics policy of Section 7 for the American Psychiatric Association.  Both Editors were decidedly – Liberal Democrats.

In 2006, Duke University published an article claiming that 49% of all US Presidents suffered from mental health issues.   Obviously Duke is not a member of the ethics standard given they could not possibly have interviewed any president.  But it is a catch-all commentary that begs – who wasn’t?

Still, the power play remains.  But in this case it isn’t the power play of politicians, it is the god-like self view among some members of the psychiatric and psychology fields who feel they can make an analysis without ever seeing the individual.  And in fact, analyze the psyche of a dead person.  To what end?   Power.  Self greatness.   Self promotion.  Celebrity status.

In the case of Marin Le Pen, it has taken the unprecedented evolution of politicizing opinion as a mental illness…

Their power is very real.  Imagine a psychiatrist arbitrarily making a determination regarding your mental health because you wrote a post on Facebook that they thought was illogical which leads to your incarceration into an institution?

US Healthcare set for a Nationalized System!

Health care in the US is beginning to look like – Canada at it’s worst.  Doctors are retiring en masse, and hospitals are choosing to provide only basic care when the cost for true health seems prohibitive in terms of dollars.

For example, a relative of mine was diagnosed with stage 4 liver and colon cancer in April.   The routine treatment;  remove the tumor in the colon and prescribe massive chemo to hopefully reduce the liver tumors.  Four months later, the tumor in the colon magically reappeared, the chemo had no effect, and the prognosis was grim.   In fact, the doctors basically scratched their heads and said there was nothing more they could do.

His wife was not so easily deterred.  She called up the Mayo Clinic – long waiting list, John Hopkins – long waiting list, and was about to give up when she remembered she had a distant cousin who worked in Administration at Sloan Kettering.  He was admitted that week, saw a surgeon who said no problem, we’ll take care of the tumor, saw an oncologist who put forth a plan of action involving removing the gall bladder so that a tarted chemo device could be implanted to spray the specific liver tumors with chemo.

Their prognosis?  He will fully recover.

Of course now he has to fight his insurance company because they don’t want to pay a dime given the treatment is ‘excessive’ – as in saving his life.

In the meantime, I was advised that my own insurance carrier has the highest mortality rate of any other insurers.  Great!

My own recent experience involved a rash that required an initial consult, a second consult, a third dermatologist, and a fourth conference to tell me there was nothing I could do, it was an incurable disease.   But when I went home and researched my incurable disease, I found a forum that told me exactly what to do – which involved going to the grocery store – 3 days later my incurable disease was gone and has not returned… Imagine that?

My doctor bill?  Just under $1000.  My grocery store bill?  About $9.00.

One in three doctors in the US is over 50, one in four is over 60.  Doctors are not entirely to blame, they have been squeezed by insurance company rules that dictate what they can do, when they can do it, and how much medication they are required to prescribe each month.   They are tired, and they feel they are a failure in their profession because of the dictates imposed on them.

Some doctors have broken the mold and take ‘no insurance’.  Only then are they truly free to ‘practice’ and make perfect.

Within this fray of emotion, many young people no longer feel the desire to even enter the medical field.  The costs are high, malpractice insurance is high, and results are based on insurance company mandates, not on cured patients.

And then of course is the predicament of the uninsured illegal immigrants being given priority healthcare and adding to the neglected ratio.

All of this is a prelude to what was inevitable when Obamacare was passed, a single payer national healthcare system, which was the plan all along.

The concept was written a century ago when it was determined that the way to complete control of a society is through control of their money – creation of the Federal Reserve, control of the markets – so that investments can be manipulated for the uber wealthy and all politicians, control of education – so that the upcoming youth is vacant of truth, history, and facts, and ultimately, control of healthcare – so that the population mandate can be implemented so that the weak are eliminated and only the strong survive.

Health care was/is the last mandate.   Just don’t get sick…

Vaccines – Efficacy and Aluminum Toxicity

The top ten causes of death in children worldwide under the age of five are as follows:

  • Neonatal causes
  • Pneumonia
  • Other (unspecified) conditions
  • Congenital anomalies and other non-communicable diseases
  • Diarrhea
  • Injury
  • Malaria
  • Prematurity
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Measles

The types of vaccines imposed on a child in the US before the age of five include:  Hepatitis B, Measles/Mumps and Rubella, Vericella, IPV, Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertusis, Rotavirus, Pneumococcal conjugate, Hepatitis A, Polio, Haemophilus.

  1. Neonatal causes:not vaccinated
  2. Other unspecified:not vaccinated
  3. Injury:Not Vaccinated
  4. Prematurity:not vaccinated.
  5. Congenital anomalies:not vaccinated

That means we are dealing with 5 potential causes of death in children:  pneumonia, diarrhea, Malaria, HIV and Measles.

Diarrhea:  In the US prior to vaccination there were roughly 37 deaths and 55,000 to 60,000 hospitalizations per year (which represented roughly 5% of child hospitalizations), although the CDC always estimates these numbers because real numbers are not available.   The vaccine was made available in 2006.  Between 1993 and 2003, studies have shown that deaths from Rotovirus were cut by 300%.  Blacks and Hispanics had a significantly higher rate of hospitalizations and deaths than whites.

Malaria:   The track of Malaria in the US indicates that most cases are in immigrant men, from Africa or the Caribbean, between the ages of 20 and 50.    The US reports roughly 2000 cases per year.

HIV/AIDS:   There are roughly 8500 cases per year in the US. The number of cases in children under the age of 13 is – zero.  Blacks and Hispanics accounted for 70% of the diagnoses.

Measles:   Measles in the US was eradicated in 2000.  According to an infectious disease expert at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Measles cases and clusters come from immigrants and are referred to as ‘imported cases’.  Despite the fact that the CDC recommends the MMR vaccine at 12 months or younger, they also claim that any child who receives the Measles vaccine at 12 months – will fail to be protected.

Pneumonia:  Predominantly the result of second hand cigarette smoke.  99% of all deaths among children occur in low and middle income countries.  The mortality rate of influenza/pneumonia deaths among children in the US spiked in 1918.   Since then it has dropped roughly 700%, and in fact had dropped 600% before the introduction of a vaccine.

What these statistics reveal is something we have known for centuries;  plagues are introduced by massive immigration and war conditions.  Without exception, historic studies have shown a correlation between the two.  That would mean if we simply vaccinated ALL the immigrants instead of the masses, we would effectively eliminate the disease and the need for vaccines completely.

But they didn’t do that in Europe…  They allowed millions of unvaccinated African natives to enter the EU countries without those precautions, live in close quarters where basic sanitation was not guaranteed or monitored, and spread those diseases like flies on a shoo-fly-pie!

Does that mean that Europe has effectively set itself up for a plague, or multiple plagues, of demonstrative proportions never seen in history before?

The other problem with vaccines that is not routinely vocalized is the fact that they all have a ‘life span’.  Depending on what maker, what dose, what brand, what concoction you received, there is a good chance you are a virtual empty vessel waiting to be impregnated with every disease known to mankind if your particular vaccine was administered 4- 19 years ago.

And if you aren’t scared yet, every disease ‘morphs’ with time and exposure, meaning that the inoculation you received 5 or 7 years ago may have absolutely nothing to do with the strain that is current and present today…  that would include the basics like Measles, like Pneumonia, or basically anything and everything viral.

So if you thought vaccines were a means to population control, consider this:  what if the means was massive viral immigration – like the eradication of most of the American Indians from Smallpox…

Wait!  Scared of the aluminum levels in the vaccines?  Not to worry, you are already getting a healthy dose from the rainfall – compliments of the EPA for – decades.  Not to worry, Aluminum sulfate has been used in our drinking water, muffins, donuts, cookware, aspirin, and salt.  Americans are most at risk for toxicity.  The major ailment associated with long-term aluminum toxicity – Alzheimers.

If you think secondary toxicity is an issue, imagine injecting it directly into the bloodstream of an infant over and over again…