Month: November 2019

Crowdstrike: Cyber Security In a Hillary World

Posted on by Helena

President Trump is bringing up an assertion that the previous government of Ukraine in conjunction with a US company, Crowdstrike, had a hand in the Trump Dossier and election meddling in 2016.   Of course the old schoolers are furious that he would even suggest such a bald faced lie given everyone knows the meddling came from Russia – proof positive per Crowdstrike’s in-depth security analysis.   Unfortunately, the Crowdstrike narrative was punched with Swiss cheese holes 2 years ago and while the stream has attempted to bury the story – it still lives!   Damn that Google for not eliminating every piece of evidence!

Any longer, when President Trump makes a comment or statement, no matter how mundane or abrupt, if the media goes berserk it is likely because the comment has backbone.

Crowdstrike was founded in 2011 by: George Kurtz formerly with McAfee, Dmitri Alperovitch also with McAfee whose family had fled the Soviet Union, and Greg Marston whose bio would seem to have been scrubbed.  Interesting…

Shawn Henry, a former Assistant Deputy at the FBI during the Clinton administration, is the current president of Crowdstrike while simultaneously serving and advising NBC, MSNBC and CNBC, while simultaneously serving as faculty at National Association of Corporate Directors. Busy!

Crowdstrike was responsible for the 2016 story that Russia hacked the DNC in order to get dirt on Hillary and favor Trump.  They affirmed this because simultaneously they claimed Russia had immobilized 80% of Ukraine’s missiles and only one country fit the cue – Russia.   This was their analysis.   Their assessment was backed by James Comey.   Since then, the methodology of Crowdstrike’s determination came into question and was found to be highly defective according to The International Institute for Strategic Studies, but even more interestingly, by John McAfee.

McAfee’s point is simply this:   “If you have the wherewithal to pull off a hack of that nature, you’ve got the wherewithal to hide who you are. Otherwise, you shouldn’t be hacking. You know this.

So when someone says, “Oh, the Russians did it,” well, that’s because someone in the incompetent government cybersecurity collective said, “We traced it back, and it sure looks like the Russians because they used a hammertoss, which the Russians always use.

If I’m the Chinese, and I want to make it look like the Russians, I’ll learn how to use hammertoss.”

The point McAfee is making is that simply asserting that a type of code has been used by a hacker in the past and every security expert knows this, it stands to reason that the hack would be hacked.

McAfee further stated, “Hackers have become much more advanced than those trying to protect against them. We’re like puppets on their strings. You know how easy it is to spoof an IP address? Thousands of programs will do it. You can do it multiple times, and it can’t be traced back to you. You can make it point to anyone you want. The fact that it points to anybody at all tells me that’s not the person who did it.”

Other cyber security firms have concurred with McAfee which makes Crowdstrike’s narrative either profoundly incompetent, or it alludes to their bedfellow relationship with Clinton.

Crowdstrike was a nothing company until Google invested $100 million in 2015.   Later additional investments from investment funds including Warberg Pincus helped lift Crowdstrike’s prominence. Warberg’s president is Timothy Geithner who was president of the NY Federal Reserve under Clinton and Secretary of Treasury under Obama. Geithner also serves on the boards of Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Bilderberg Group, and the Center For Global Development.   Geithner’s father and grandfather were principles in the Ford Foundation – a serious manipulator within the mechanisms aligned with Soros Open Society – among others.

When Geithner left his position as Treasury Secretary, he proposed Hillary Clinton as his successor.

Alperovitch is senior fellow at The Atlantic Council.   The initial purpose of the Atlantic Council was to make sure Europe and the US were aligned.   Council members are a who’s who of the liberal Swamp:   Chuck Hagel, James Jones, Susan Rice, Richard Holbrooke, etc… etc… etc… Even the New York Times called out the Atlantic Council for receiving funding from 25 foreign governments. It’s board has consisted of rather interesting fellows from the ranks of Clinton, Bush and Obama.

So why would they be backing a relatively obscure cyber security company, Crowdstrike, when there are literally hundreds of more mature companies to choose from?

Because, they can control the strings.

As McAfee had noted, the intel within the government during the Hillary/Obama reign was operating under the auspices of a bunch of old men with antiquated ideas who had no idea what the cyber world was capable of doing.   McAfee’s recommendation was to offer double salary to the best of the best, overlooking the died purple hair, ring in the nose, gumshoe wearing tye dyed tea shirt manifesto, who regularly smoked weed.   In his esteemed analysis – when you are looking for real cyber security, who the ‘heck’ cares what they look like, if they are the best in the field! Because that is why the US government remains in a pigeonhole of inability to compete – we are so indoctrinated into manners, suits, and Harvard, that we lose what counts – competence.

Instead, in the past, the US government has been more concerned with creating backup companies whose data can conform to a predetermined end point to support an agenda – rather than an analysis of competent, intelligent, fact finding security.

President Trump’s statement with regard to Crowdstrike, is likely the tip of their iceberg about to melt as all things always point back to – Hillary.

Ocasio Boyfriend: Riley Roberts A or B – An Obama Creation

Posted on by Helena

Ocasio Cortez has a boyfriend, although there is a spattering of websites that claim he is her husband, Riley Roberts.   Information about him is oddly scarce, reports are vague, as though they may be somewhat – manufactured. 

There are some reports that claim Riley has an income potential for his line of work of $30,000 to $100,000 “per month”.   One would think that such a high earning potential, the man would have his resume and profile everywhere – even Bloomberg… And yet, even his LinkedIn page is oddly devoid.

One link is his ‘startup’, Homebinder, which he claims was co-founded by himself in 2014.   But he didn’t found this company, Homebinder, he simply works in ‘marketing’ and even has no presence on the website.   When listing his education, this self editing website, LinkedIn, states that he earned two bachelors degrees simultaneously: BS and BA – 2008 – 2012.   There is no picture of Riley, and this company which relies solely on marketing – isn’t marketed.

According to Crunchbase, Homebinder was founded by Jack Huntress in 2012.

It gained a couple employees in 2016 including VP Greg Moretti and Alec Ahee. Their Facebook page lists three reviews from 2017 and 1 in 2018, and they haven’t posted since March 2018.   And Twitter? It has been defunct since 2017.

Everybody in this loop went to Boston University – including Ocasio.

On the LinkedIn page for Jack Huntress, his about paragraph includes the self describing wording – “…relationship…with capitalists.”   One would conclude he is not a Socialist.

The other company associated with Riley Roberts is RileyUX.   Unfortunately, all their social media accounts are blocked and their website is password protected – ie, no entry – zero. Their YouTube account was created – with “no content”.   For a business that makes its living selling IT expertise, as a customer it would be rather impossible to find them.

White Pages lists Riley’s current address in the Bronx with other family members including; Sergio Ocasio, Jr, and Carlos M Cortes. Carlos has two addresses that are listed to him as ‘current’, the one with Riley and another in the same building but a different apartment number (1f and 4d).   Sergio Ocasio also has two current residences, the one he shares with Riley and another which he shares with other family members of ‘Ocasio’. It would appear that the Riley and Ocasio addresses are fronts given the multiple residents.

Whether RileyUX even exists is questionable.

So what can we conclude from this very limited information of lies, deceptions, and fakery?

Ocasio has a boyfriend whom she may have married whose expertise is IT Tech and software manipulation. His earning capability would put him in the range of $360,000 to $1million per year, yet he would seem to have no job.

However, records have surfaced that he is employed by Ocasio as a staffer…in the White House.   As an IT hacker, it would follow that he has infiltrated the IT security within the White House and possibly compromised Trump’s confidentiality.

And then there is the ‘other Riley Roberts’, Riley B.   The one who looks exactly like Ocasio Cortez’s boyfriend except that this Riley has an entirely different background:

Riley Roberts B happens to be the exact same age as the Riley A, and was a speech writer for Eric Holder.  Prior to that he interned in ‘Senator Obama’s’ office. After his internship with Obama, Riley went on to work in the office of Joe Sestalk’s campaign. It was after Sestalk’s defeat that Eric Holder picked up Riley to be his personal speech writer. In that capacity he dealt with the CIA, the State Department and the White House.  That would mean some rather specialized security clearance!

After his stint with Holder, Riley went on to become senior writer at West Wing Writers in DC . Their website’s opening slogan is:   “We are veterans of Bill Clinton’s White House and Barack Obama’s administration — of campaigns, state capitals, and Capitol Hill.”  However, he is not listed as a member of their ‘Team’.

Further in: “ We’ll help you find your story. We did it for the President of the United States.  We’ve done it for the most prominent executives, entertainers, philanthropists, and athletes in the world.  We can do it for you.”

In other words this company for which Riley is a senior writer is the creator of personalities. They will mold every aspect of you, tell you what to say, tell you where you came from, and define your family, they will build your history and present and future.   They will coach you on appearance, and couture. A finishing school for the elite.

Riley’s LinkedIn page lists contact information where he gives as his ‘personal website’;  justice.gov/opa/contact-office.   And of course the staff directory does not include his name.

It would appear, Riley was building his own reflection in the form of Ocasio’s boyfriend – only the project was dumped and the boyfriend lost existence sometime in 2017-2018. Riley B married in 2015 and is listed as having divorced as of February 2019 and living in DC.  Neither Riley A nor Riley B would appear to have any verifiable work history despite attempting to create a trail.

If Riley A and B are one and the same – that would mean that the Riley persona was a creation in order to master the puppet of Ocasio so as to tell her what to say, when to say it, how to say it, where, and most importantly coach every word that she uttered from the puppet master monarchial system leading from Riley to Holder to Obama, to his handler, Soros.   It would be no different than pounding the keys of a computer – only the pounder is Riley and the output is – Ocasio.

After Ocasio was elected they got lazy and let the trail of the created boyfriend fall into the abyss.

In essence – Riley is NOT behind the scenes, he created the scenes!

Which of course means that Ocasio was created by Riley, in adherence from Obama instructions, who is a slave of the Soros Deep State.  And Riley A and Riley B – are one and the same.

Here is a picture of Riley A: https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/riley-roberts-beard-makeover-knock-down-the-house-instagram

Here is a picture of Riley B: https://www.prdaily.com/ragan_speakers/riley-roberts/

PROTESTS and RIOTS Organized by NED and Soros Open Society as Prelude to Marxist Revolution!

Posted on by Helena

Where Are The Protests/Riots?

Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Sudan, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Hong Kong, France, Spain, Portugal, Indonesia, Egypt and Georgia.

While the MSM would have us believe there is absolutely no interconnection among these ‘random’ protests that initiate from some obscure rationale, the truth is they are wholly organized under one banner.

Various NGO’s integrate inside universities across the globe, conduct youth movement workshops, and train radicalism.   They promote a Socialist doctrine under the tenets of Marxism claiming that capitalism has destroyed economic equality and a ‘collective’ unity embracing communist ideals is the answer.

Once a protest has been established, they infiltrate the peaceful conduct and create chaos. In many countries the police are called to stand down. Human rights organizations condemn the use of any means to deter the violence because they are – students.

And as such, entire economies are crumpling as some governments are forced to initiate a coup against themselves in order to save their country from complete collapse. The Chilean President sacked his entire cabinet and rewrote the Constitution in order to restrain the violence.   Despite these actions, the revolutionaries continue their vent of destruction.

The bankers behind these riots?

Open Democracy, which is funded through Soros Open Society, Ford Foundation and the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and the National Endowment for Democracy.   Within these roots are a host of smaller NGO’s and media outlets; Green Bright, Project Syndicate, Al Jazeera, People and Planet, New Statesman and others.

Their slogan?   Economic Redistribution through Revolution. Their ideology? Socialist reform through Marxism.

The International Committee for the Fourth International, a world socialist organization, is advocating for their members to read and embrace Russia’s Bolshevik Revolution as a model for today. The enlightenment?   “Toward Workers Power and World Socialist Revolution”.

In Iraq, the protests began in October over low wages and unemployment and were led predominantly by young males. Since then, the protests have turned to riots, 320 people dead, over 15,000 wounded, and no end in sight as the rioters now demand a complete overthrow of the government – as in a coup. Initiated by the Sadrist Movement which is headed by Muqtada al-Sadr, the protestors have shut down roads, blocked 50% of the shipping operations, blocked oil fields, destroyed businesses, set fires, advocated looting – and the result? Over $6 billion in costs and rising. The President has agreed to fire the PM, hold new elections, and overhaul the system, in order to meet the demands of the protesters – yet they are not stopping.

Iran’s protests are largely by young males. So far 100 banks, numerous gas stations and 57 shops have been set on fire.   The driving reason? A hefty increase in gas prices. Only 17.8% of the people in Iran even own a car, rarely would that include young males, and the price of gas in Iran is the second lowest in the world next to Sudan. The price increase is a progressive one based on the amount of gas purchased per month and would put Iran’s cost on par with Iraq at its most expensive.

In Chile, student rebellions have cost businesses to lose $1.5 billion and destroyed public transportation at a cost of $400 million. The protests were initiated after the government proposed a fare hike of $.04 which represented a 3.3% increase. The protests were initially instigated by high school students who were exempt from paying the train fares.   So the hike actually had zero impact on them.

Today schools are shuttered, thousands have lost their livelihood, their homes, the wage, and buildings are defaced and torched.   Redistribution of wealth is now the primary objective and the President has fired his entire cabinet and a new Constitution has been written.   But the protests and the destruction continues unabated. In Santiago, rioters burned a church, hauled out artifacts and destroyed them in the streets.   But they are ‘students’ so the global call is to ‘stand down’.

And the UN condemns any attempt to quell the violence.

In Chile, The Social Unity Movement has been instrumental in organizing protests as well as various labor organizations. One such organization is Unitary Central of Workers, headed by Bárbara Figueroa, the daughter of union leaders and Communist militants, who has been in the forefront of organizing the riots.

Camila Vallejo and Karol Cariola, also members of the Communist Party, have been likened to Ocasio Cortez as they rise up against the government and right-leaning President Pinera.

The media is attempting to rewrite the truth claiming Chile has been run under a Dictatorship and the good-students are simply turning the country away from oppression toward democracy. In fact, the good-students are organizing a communist ideology within Marxism.

Hong Kong, Lebanon, etc…, the goal is the same, the means are the same, and the organizations behind these chaotic coups – are the same.

According to the Soros organization, Moveon.org, massive rallies are planned across the US the evening before the House floor votes to pass articles of impeachment against Donald Trump. Of course, that means – it is already decided that such a vote will occur.

Denver, Fort Collins, Houston, LA, Tucson, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Miami, there are literally hundreds of locations (267 to be exact) that have already been established with hosts, affiliates, and specific locations. Signup sheets, mobilization, and tactics are in place.

Climate Change: A Global Geo-Engineering Experiment

Posted on by Helena

Weather modification used to be considered a ‘conspiracy theory’, but like many other conspiracies, today it is acknowledged as fact.   From the simplistic to the complex, the concept has many useful positives;   increasing water supplies, preventing hail and hurricanes, and dousing wildfires. But there are also useful military objectives which are more cynical and deadly in their agenda.

While climate gurus continue to scream ‘the sky is falling’, Harvard has been busily at work the past two years geo-engineering weather thru solar deflection.

China has been manufacturing cloud rain for over a decade, launching silver iodide with rockets and via planes across swathes of the Tibetan Tableau the size of Alaska, the project is considered the largest in the world.

ScoPex is the Harvard experiment which includes the introduction of particles in the stratosphere in order to deflect solar activity away from earth.   According to NASA, such a scheme could devastate agriculture.   The argument in support of the program is that the positive effects out-weigh the negative impacts.   I disagree.

Harvard contends that rising sea levels as a result of global warming will decimate valuable land and millions of homes. The analogy is to ‘chemotherapy’.   But even the analogy is flawed given that chemo only works on some people some of the time.   By contrast, geo-engineering has been shown to have substantial impacts on weather intensity, weather patterns, and rainfall.

The same issues that the alarmists are now claiming are a result of global warming could in fact be the result of saving the planet from climate change.   Perhaps the very technology utilized across the globe to alter weather is actually responsible for creating intensely destructive weather.  For example our jet streams are linked to solar radiation, change the solar you alter the jet stream.  Air masses push the jet stream around, change the air mass and you have effectively altered the weather pattern.  The jet stream pattern has only been monitored since 2000, so identifying changes is only as good as the record exists.  But obviously if we suddenly begin inserting particle matter to deflect the sun, the jet stream will be affected.

It stands to reason that geo-engineering and cloud seeding may have far more disruptive ramifications than scientists are willing to reveal.  I refer to it as the ‘oops factor’.

While one justification for the manipulation is for the purpose of redirecting or eliminating hurricanes, it is just as likely that the modification could ramp up these storms as well.   While Harvard and China represent just two specific projects that are currently being utilized, there are likely hundreds being employed by various nations – none in collaboration with another.

India uses small planes equipped with twelve cylinders. Flying into the belly of a storm cloud, the cylinders are filled with combustible chloride and released at intervals. With agriculture in India failing from lack of water, the Harvard geo-engineering experiment could cause India’s production to fail completely from lack of sunlight.

It is less like chemotherapy and more like a Molotov cocktail.

While scientists had polar views on the effect of geo-engineering, Harvard ignored the negative reactions and sent up its first flood of particulates in early spring 2019.

And despite all the information available regarding these various geo-engineering actions, the media is still attempting to manipulate our understanding of the true cause and causal actions taking place.

“July was earth’s hottest month on record”! The articles go on to actually explain that the ‘record’ they refer to is for the 20th century.  In the realm of millions of years, a century is relatively meaningless.

Historically, temperatures were taken manually on land and ships at sea. There were no computers, no standardized measurement system, no sophisticated instruments like we use today.   All statistical science has margins of error.   But climate scientists fail to provide that margin – ever. In fact, determining temperatures historically did not even include tenths of percentages.   Thus to calculate that the global temperature rose by .7’ between 1850 and 2003 could not be factual, it would be a theory. An estimate. As of today, that estimate is .8% based on unproven science that has changed dramatically in its ability to create an accurate model.

In theory, the enhancement of global temperature could align with the advancement of weather manipulation and geo-engineering just as easily as claiming the casual factor is carbon emissions.

According to scientists, the last ice age ended between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago. That would indicate a potential deviation of 10,000 years – not terribly accurate.   Scientists claim that the reason the ice age ended was due to a rise in carbon dioxide.   Volcanic eruptions create vast plumes of carbon dioxide.   Volcanoes exist both on land and undersea. There have been 404 volcanic eruptions since 1883.   Since 1980 – there have been 18 volcanic eruptions with a rating of at least VEI of 4.

It is estimated that 200 million tons of carbon are emit into the atmosphere annually by volcanic action.

But even this data is an extrapolation, not a fact.   Still it has widely been the accepted causal factor that pulled earth out of its last ice age. Why? Because science has no other explanation.

In other words: based on massive extrapolations, estimates, best guesses, faulty science, and zero historical technology, science has concluded that our planet needs geo-engineering of our natural climate change in order to ‘save the planet’ and ‘save the children’.

And in so doing – may actually wipe out large swathes of agriculture production in order to save a few estimated millions of houses many of which are built of mud and clay.

Impeachment Hearing: Class 101

Posted on by Helena

The President Trump impeachment hearings have descended into what would be viewed as a clown show at best. Key witnesses are coming forth having actually witnessed nothing, testimony is continually altered or changed, and new witnesses are called by the Democrats as they realize their old witnesses are collapsing:

Bill Taylor’s aide claims he overheard a conversation between Sondland and Trump in which he heard Trump ask about the ‘investigations’.   That would indicate the phone call was on speaker.   But it wasn’t – it was a cell phone call at a busy noisy restaurant on July 26th  in Kiev. The aid has not testified – his name is David Holmes and he is a counselor at the US embassy in Kiev.

In 2013, David Holmes was appointed by Obama as Director for Afghanistan.   In June 2013, he was present at a national security meeting held by Obama along with the newly appointed Avril Haines formerly serving as Director of the CIA before being appointed Obama’s deputy counsel.

According to Taylor, his aide told him that Sondland called Trump on his cell phone and Holmes claimed he could hear both sides of the conversation. Yet afterward, Holmes asked Sondland what President Trump ‘thought about Ukraine’. If he had heard both sides of the phone call, why would he ask this question?   Sondland replied with a shrug, Trump cares about the Biden investigation. That amounts to chit-chat.

Trump notified Congress that he would be holding up military aid to Ukraine in June, no one objected. Zelensky won the election on July 21st.  Holmes, Taylor and Sondland were all in Ukraine on July 26th.   Trump had no idea what kind of president Zelensky would make, Ukraine had been mired in corruption and war for 5 years, and his meeting with Zelensky would not take place until the end of September.

Nothing in this testimony says anything about Ukraine aid.

So far, we have an aid who claims he heard two sides of a cell phone conversation in which nothing is discussed except Sondland’s meetings. The aid then makes conclusions that Trump is bribing the newly elected Zelensky and runs home to tell his boss, Bill Taylor what he thinks he knows.   Bill Taylor then relays in hearings what his aid thinks he might have heard, but didn’t really, because Ukraine aid was never discussed, however Sondland was miffed because President Trump didn’t care about Ukraine but asked about the investigation that Biden had coerced the then prosecutor to drop or else Biden would withhold aid…

So it isn’t merely hearsay, Taylor’s testimony is now gossip down the line of gossip.

The Democrats defend the hearsay claiming Taylor was ‘under oath’ and therefore his hearsay isn’t real hearsay, it’s something else…

Media Liberals claim the evidence is damaging and proves Trump committed a sort of bribery scheme of ‘I will release the aid if you reopen the investigation against Hunter Biden.’   But President Trump never actually said that, all the evidence reveals is that some people who heard bits and pieces of a telephone conversation in which they were not privy made conclusions as to how they personally viewed said conversation despite hearing nothing to allude to aid.

The fact that the President of Ukraine, Zelensky, and his staff find the entire frame of the conversation as damning preposterous at best, and comedic at worst, invites no credibility.   Why?

Are the democrats saying that testimony by the Ukrainian president is not worthy of acceptance? Are they claiming the Ukraine president is lying?   Because that would indicate that they feel the Ukraine president is corrupt… And if the Ukraine president is corrupt, then deferring aide to Ukraine would be completely within President Trump’s authority.

Democrats site that ‘all the witnesses are corroborating each other’ – yet all the witnesses give depositions behind closed doors, we have no idea what coercion might be relayed.
So far, most of the testimony is supposition and has taken a simple remark made by Sondland and embellished it with theories and innuendo.   The fact that Trump withheld the aid a full month before the telephone conversation took place, before Zelensky was elected, refutes nearly every statement.   The fact that Zelensky won the election based on his promise to eradicate all corruption is also telling knowing that Biden had quashed the initial investigation into Burisma by threatening to withhold aid back in 2016. In essence it is Biden who should have been impeached as VP under Obama given his public admission that is widely available.

The impeachment hearing is marked with legal issues, corruption, altered words, and the absolute heinous desire to derail President Trump because the 2020 election is a Democrat failure.

AFRICA: A Socialist Continent Aligned with Marxist Rule

Posted on by Helena

While pundits frequently address failed socialism in Venezuela, Cuba, and parts of Europe, few seem to remember or want to unleash the fact that nearly all of Africa was at one time Marxist and now has evolved to Socialism – in name only.  

When African nations began gaining independence from the colonialists of Europe in the 1950’s to1960’s, they equated capitalism with colonialism and thus adopted what they were led to believe was better – Marxist Socialism.

Foreign companies were nationalized while state owned companies were created. Price controls were implemented on rent, trade, exchange, and agriculture. By 1961, the farmers in Ghana could no longer produce enough food for their own subsistence. Millions began to face starvation throughout the continent.   And a culture of refugees was created as people fled to other countries for the privilege of food!

They called it African Socialism as distinguished from Marxism, and used the rationale as a call to mobilize and unite countries shedding colonialism. It was seen as a Movement, a freedom cry whereby these nations were now relieved of the oppression of their colonial warlords – the French, the British and the Spanish.   These were the colonialists that confiscated Africa and ruled from within.

Under colonialism, Africans did not enjoy ‘private property’ and so when socialism was introduced no one objected because no one had ever known anything else. While they couldn’t really identify why African Socialism was any different from Marx, they proclaimed its equality factor, a classless society that would unify all under one status.   Ultimately, that status was abject poverty, starvation, and death.

Materialism was ‘bad’, and collectivism was ‘good’. And it was seen as a Revolutionary Movement!

In Ghana, it took less than 10 years after gaining independence in 1957 for the economy to crash and the president to declare himself as president for life as a means of ensuring his own honor – and wealth preservation.   And as is common in all transitions to socialism, a new Constitution had to be created to conform to the new dictums. The Constitutional Amendment declaring his life as president was approved by 99.91% of voters…

In 1966, while President Nkrumah was off on a visit with North Korea and China, a coup led by the military and police assured he would not be the monarchial socialist for life and he fled to exile. It is estimated that his wealth while president was more than $20 million. That would equate to roughly $150 million today.

But the fate of Ghana was only one of many countries that imploded relatively quickly.   And despite those implosions, many African nations continue their ideology of socialism under rebranding.

For example: Angola rebranded as a social democracy wherein presidential elections are scrapped and instead the president and vice president of the political party that wins the election take office. There are no separation of powers, and the Constitution declares the government to be an ‘authoritarian regime’.  Santos served as president for 38 years, his daughter became the wealthiest woman in Africa with an estimated net worth of over $3 billion. Somewhat like Congress in the US.

This is how Socialism works.

IN Angola, healthcare is free – sort of.   It is severely underfunded, understaffed, and difficult to access – expats are highly encouraged to purchase private insurance. Most of the doctors in Angola are Cuban because, well Angola has no medical profession.   Education is free – for eight years – but few actually go to school.   During the last civil war 1975-2002 all the schools were destroyed. Factors for children not attending include poor health because the healthcare system is completely broken.

Still not convinced? Let’s take a look at Nigeria where the new and improved president political ideology is the All Progressives Congress.   A fancy name for Socialism.   IN fact their international affiliation is “Socialist International”.

Socialist International has members from 100 countries across the globe and was formed in Frankfurt Germany in 1951.   Surprise. Presidents of this organization are borne from mostly European countries; France, Austria, UK, Denmark, Portugal, Greece, Sweden, Finland, etc…  The European Commission is – Socialist.

Mozambique, a destination for many tourists is also ruled under Socialist International having previously aspired to Marxist-Leninism.   Foreign support for the current party has included; Somalia, Cuba, China, Soviet Russia, and the wonderfully socialist countries of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. Its GDP per capita is $493 ranking as one of the poorest countries in the world.   They have virtually no health care, and the completion rate for primary school was last estimated to be 90,000 children.

Equatorial Guinea is the wealthiest on a per capita basis serving under the authoritarian rule of a dictator who has been in office since 1979 and belongs to the Democrat Party which has no platform other than militarism rule. But then it is the only party.

Ever wonder why Africa remains so poor and stagnate despite industrialization and growth everywhere else?   Despite vast swathes of resources?   Despite UN monitoring elections?   Despite billions of investment?

They have evolved from Marxism to Socialism by name only.

IF the media were to show how ‘well’ Socialism has contributed to the equality and wealth of African people, I wonder how it might be recognized for what it truly is by the youth market in the US – it is a means for creating absolute poverty while enriching the One, the president for life and his family.  

Ukraine Aid: Corruption is in US

Posted on by Helena

Want to know where US aid to Ukraine actually goes? Good luck. It goes through a maize of US departments and NGO’s before being distributed to in-house country NGO’s as determined by the initial NGO that gets the government grant.   The NGO’s in the destination country then use the money how they want.   Less than 45% of any money leaves a trail of transparency.   And it never has.

When President Trump put a hold on Ukraine aid money in June 2019 due to what he called possible corruption, everyone assumed he referred to Ukraine corruption because everyone knows Ukraine’s government has been corrupt.   But maybe President Trump was referring to the NGOs.   Our own NGO’s.

Foreign aid is supposed to be classed as either Economic or Military.   For example; in 2017 Ukraine received $256 million in Economic aid, and $250 million in Military aid.   Between 1992 and 2014, the US sent Ukraine between $3 and $5 billion, a discrepancy of 40%, representing an annual average of roughly $136 million total per year.   With the Orange Revolution and coup, Obama ramped up that annual average considerably to $500 million. As President Trump noted we are the largest ‘cash’ donor, the EU and Germany have given loans some of which run through NATO and the UN which is also predominantly funded by – the US.

There are four main channels through which aid is funneled initially;   National Endowment for Democracy (NED), State Department, USAID and the Millennium Challenge Corporation. Each of these NGO’s have their own budget to enrich before they can direct funds to anyone else.

The Millennium Challenge budget is $800 million.   Ukraine is not on their list as an eligible country for money.  So I eliminate this NGO as a corrupt Ukraine source.

USAID has an annual operational budget of $27billion. Their aid is 100% Economic.

NED is a grant making NGO which distributes to four main organizations including:   American Center for International Labor Solidarity, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, International Republican Institute, and the Center for International Development of Private Enterprise – as in Burisma, the Biden brainchild.

“NED has also supported, provided training, and consulted with groups which approve of democracy, but criticize the United States, in countries such as Indonesia and Ukraine.”   In other words, NED supports protest groups and coups.

That would be – The Deep State, ie corruption.

In 2017, NED gave their annual award to a Ukraine group, TOM 14, which launched an ‘anti-corruption television program’, Nashi Hroshi.   On it’s website, sponsors of Nashi Hroshi include: Soros Open Society, Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Omidyar Network, Google and others…

IN 2018, NED’s budget was $168 million, they claim to distribute roughly $60million in grants, . In May 2018, President Trump stated he would slash their budget by 2/3rds.   This must be approved by Congress, The Deep State. The press went wild with anger and bitter contempt directed at Trump claiming, “United States is turning its back on supporting brave people who share our values.”   Those values would be aligned with Soros and the Deep State Agenda.   NED is banned in Russia as an undesirable.

In 1991, the then president of NED declared that CIA funding for covert actions was now being diverted to the nicey nice people at NED instead, because of transparency issues.   So in essence NED is simply the coup house for the CIA.   In 1993, the House of Representatives introduced a bill to eliminate the Clinton budget request for NED, at the time both the House and Senate were Democrat majority – and so it went.

IN 2014, Obama declared Military assistance to Ukraine as a direct result of the coup would be $1.5 billion paid in installments.   IN an article by the very liberal, Huffington Post in 2014, they wrote that they were quite skeptical of US foreign aid to Ukraine due to the incredible lack of transparency and the high potential for corruption.   Hunter Biden took his Board position with Ukraine’s Burisma Holding Company registered in Cyprus in – 2014.

According to the US Foreign Assistance website, there are 20 different governmental agencies that distribute foreign aid.   One such agency, US Trade and Development Agency has 72 pages of recipients.   Another, the Peace Corps, has 14,242 PAGES, with such allusive names as Volunteer Support…    The Department of Defense lists 4,434 Data Results for 2017 including $195million for Ukraine.  Obviously going through each data set for 20 agencies would require a network of computers and still that would not account for all the NGOs.

SO, all in all, how much money has Ukraine actually received?

NO clue.   No one really knows.

We can’t fix Ukraine’s corruption, but we can defund our own, starting with ‘covert’ NGO’s.

Socialist Marxism: Fighting the Pope, Fighting Soros – MAGA!

Posted on by Helena

When did the Catholic Church adopt Marxism?   A bishop in El Paso, Mark Seitz, is holding a vigil on the border claiming that all people are welcome!   His message is that we all need to live in communion.   In reality, his words should be rephrased to, ‘we all need to live in communism’, because essentially, Bishop Seitz is a self proclaimed ‘neo-Marxist’, and pro-open borders immigration.  Yet, despite these rather anarchist proclivities, Pope Francis appointed him Bishop of El Paso in 2013.  

Seitz follows liberation theology, which is based within far-left politics. Rising in the 1950’s in South America, it is a movement that has spread into Mexico, Haiti and the US.   In 1983 Joseph Ratsinger, who later became Pope Benedict XVI, called out the leaders of this movement for politicizing religion and using the Bible inappropriately to support a political ideology of – Open Society.  Pope Benedict censored and suspended some priests for ignoring his denouncement of the movement.   And then along came Pope Francis.

Pope Francis is the first to come from the order of Jesuits.

The Jesuits are a society formed in the mid 1500’s . Their history is mired in assassination accusations, power, greed, and treason, and today child molestation.   They have created 168 educational institutions across the globe teaching a modern day version of Eloquentia Perfecta – which loosely means cultivating a person as a whole. It is a method of training a person to persuade others to think as they do through a merging of speaking techniques and virtue signaling.

In 1981 as Europe became increasingly more socialist and the new socialists embraced Marxism, Father Menendez Urena wrote The Myth of Christian Socialism in hopes of pulling the church away from liberation theology and its love affair with Marxist philosophy.   Urena belonged to the Mont Pelerin Society.

The Mont Pelerin Society calls itself an economic think tank along classical liberal lines of thought. Its founders are quite prestigious Economists and philosophers, including; Milton Friedman, George Stigler, Friedrich Hayek, Frank Knight, Ludwig von Mises and Karl Popper.

Despite coming together to form this Mont Pelerin Society, their philosophies on economics were not always aligned – and in one instance Mises became incensed and claimed the other five were a bunch of – Socialists.   It was an era of the rise of fascism in Europe, and some believed that socialism was the only means to quell fascism.   These economists fought each other and their ideals, and today the Mont Pelerin Society embraces the Austrian school of economics within the theory of Mises view of methodological individualism and ‘classical liberalism’. Hayek supported this theory and explained its process within his book;  The Road to Serfdom.  While Karl Popper fought an intellectual battle within himself regarding socialism and its perceived venue of equality.

Classical Liberalism in its original creation is actually much more closely aligned with todays conservative libertarianism of limited government and laissez faire markets.

In 2016, Pope Francis installed as the Vaticans general superior a Venezuelan, Fr. Arturo Sosa Abascal.  Pope Francis biographer, George Neumayr, described Sosa as a “Marxist”, “a Venezuelian communist, and modernist”.   According to Neumayr, the only presidential candidate invited to the Vatican in 2016 was then candidate, Bernie Sanders, a Jew – “We invited the candidate who cites the pope most in the campaign, and that is Senator Bernie Sanders,” explained Sorondo, Francis’ close friend, who added that Sanders’s agenda is “very analogous to that of the pope.”

It is thought that Francis has systematically installed Marxist believers into his cabinet to advance global socialism. The caravans coming through Mexico and invading US borders were financed by these Jesuit churches and – Soros.

Soros studied under Karl Popper while at the London School of Economics post WWII.   That education provided him with the insight to develop an agenda, implement its ideals, and create a serfdom much like what Hitler attempted and failed to sustain.

The schism that came to be between these initial six economics powerhouses of the Mont Pelerin Society blossomed into a revolution of chaos and power struggles across the globe.

The Jesuits had power within educational institutions, and ultimately within the entire global Catholic community under the auspices of the Jesuit Pope Francis.   Soros brought a different skill set:   1.   His knowledge of socialism under Hitler and the Nazi’s – and where it failed, and 2.   A very highbrow education in economics at the London School of Economics whereby he realized how to recreate the National Socialists across the globe utilizing the socialist Economic ideologies of Karl Popper and Friedrich Hayek.

Today, economists still argue which philosophy is best for the people – socialism or classical liberalism.   But they argue from an historical perspective instead of from the present day, and so distort the future. They present blocks of information, but use as their core or base, a version of society and economics defined a hundred years ago.   And thus, like much of science, their very argumentative factual presentation is eternally – theory, systemic failure.

Unfortunately, in all this massive intellectualism fighting to define the globe within their parameters, The People have become serfs and are told to follow like sheepel whoever rules because they know best, they have money and they have education and they have power. Trump doesn’t speak their language.  And suddenly confronted with a truly alien identity, within The Art of War, they underestimated their enemy.

When media became more prolific and internet access opened minds and doors, the Agenda was suddenly facing its most feared opposition – Truth.   Racing to close Pandora’s Box, they have sought to own the media, to censor the media, to provide only what information sheepel can best understand – Eloquentia Perfecta!   The Jesuits taught them how to brainwash the masses.

We can only sustain as long as history records are not destroyed.   As long as media access is not censored. As long as Socialism is rooted for what it truly represents – tyranny and serfdom!

The Deep State and the Rogue CIA: Who Runs The Show…

Posted on by Helena

Syrian President Assad gave a state interview in which he claimed there was not enough evidence to support the US statement that Baghdadi had been killed any more than there was verifiable proof Osama bin Laden had been killed.   In this interview he references an interesting concept that has been considered before; Baghdadi was a CIA asset.

This would explain why Susan Rice and Obama went ballistic when told Baghdadi had been killed – without their permission.

Assad claims that the director of these unsubstantiated claims is always the same – America.   But it isn’t America, it is who is running the show.  And in failing to acknowledge this very important difference Assad could easily fall into the same agenda – is it Communist Soviet Union, or Capitalist Russia?   Is it Ottomon Empire or the Middle East?   Nations come and go based on the government that leads. And Assad would do well to recognize that President Trump is not his predecessors.

While the New York Times has mentioned The Deep State, when ex-CIA Deputy Director, John McLaughlin, made the reference in a campaign promoting impeachment, the conspiracy that was – was officially outed.   Joined at the event by former FBI Director, Andy McCabe, and former CIA boss, Brennan, McLaughlin stated, “This is not an institution (referring to the CIA) that is not in a chain of command that makes or implements policy.”

Obviously, there are parallel universes with respect to ‘truth’ and the ‘CIA’. And the history of Baghdadi is note worthy within that above statement:

In 2004 when Bush was president, US forces captured the first Baghdadi in Fallujah considering him to be a low level member of al Qaeda.   He was placed in Camp Bucca detention center in Iraq under his civilian name Ibrahim Awad Ibrahim al-Badry.   Ten months later he was released unconditionally.  Why?

In 2006, Condoleezza Rice gave a press conference about The New Middle East in which she stated,   “what we’re seeing here [in regards to the destruction of Lebanon and the Israeli attacks on Lebanon], in a sense, is the growing—the ‘birth pangs’—of a ‘New Middle East’ and whatever we do we have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the New Middle East [and] not going back to the old one.”

Within the plan was a redrawing of each countries territory in the Middle East to conform to this New and improved plan utilizing the ‘unleashing of forces of constructive chaos’, according to Rice.   At the time, Lebanon was considered the focal point, the birth pang.  In 2006, Israel launched a full blown attack on Lebanon displacing 1 million Lebanese and 500,000 Israelis.

The United States under Bush, Britain under Tony Blair, and Israel under Ehud Olmert were aligned in this redrawing scheme. Former US National Security Advisor, Brzezinski, alluded to the fact that the target was considered the Eurasian Balkans and would represent a coup toward ultimately chaining Russia.  The map would significantly reduce the size of Turkey, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia while creating new states within these borders that would be effectively owned and run by the US, UK and Israel.

In 2006, ISIS rose as the Islamic State of Iraq.   Its leader, or General, was – Khalil al Zawi, he was also known as Al-Baghdadi. In 2007, a US Brigadier General, Kevin Burgner, claimed that Baghdadi did not even exist and that he was really a staged elderly cleric whose voice was used over a picture that was a fictional character. An intermediary to Osama bin Laden made the same claim. In 2008, another claim to support this was floated by a spokesperson for Hamas-Iraq.  The US Deep State chose not to comment.

Throughout 2007 to 2010, there were numerous reports of al-Baghdadi’s capture and death by the Iraqi Ministry.   Then in April 2010, it was announced once again that al-Baghdadi was killed by a joint effort of US and Iraqi forces.   Joe Biden was quoted as saying, “the killings were potentially devastating blows to the terrorist network.”  Whether he even existed was never really addressed or confirmed.

An ISIS website was cited as concurring that Baghdadi’s death was real and Abu Baghdadi succeeded in becoming the new leader of ISIS.  The CIA announced this fact.

In 2013, two photos emerged showing McCain in Syria with the Free Syrian Army and a man who looked very much like Baghdadi in the background. There is no claim the photos were shopped, but there are conflicting accounts as to who the man really is.   However, the fact that McCain was in Syria at all meeting with rebels is a bit disconcerting. McCain’s communications director, Brian Rogers, denied the picture was of Baghdadi and said instead this man was a high ranking official in the Northern Storm Brigade.   Ultimately, the Northern Storm Brigade was found to be affiliated with ISIS.

Two years earlier, McCain was in Benghazi while it was held by rebels looking to oust Gaddafi. McCain was in Ukraine during the rise of protestors seeking a coup in 2013, and again supporting the rebels as they fought against the residents of Donbas.

The internet defines Deep State As:   “a form of clandestine government made up of hidden or covert networks of power operating independently of a state’s political leadership, in pursuit of their own agenda and goals. Examples include organs of state, such as the armed forces or public authorities, intelligence agencies, police, secret police, administrative agencies, and government bureaucracy. A deep state can also take the form of entrenched, career civil servants acting in a non-conspiratorial manner, to further their own interests. The intent of a deep state can include continuity of the state itself, job security for its members, enhanced power and authority, and the pursuit of ideological objectives. It can operate in opposition to the agenda of elected officials, by obstructing, resisting, and subverting their policies, conditions and directives. It can also take the form of government owned corporations (CIA) or private companies (NED, NGO’s) that act independently of regulatory or governmental control.”

Who created ISIS?   Was it the Deep State in order to achieve the agenda for a New Middle East through what Condoleezza Rice termed ‘constructive chaos’?   Is the New Middle East part of the agenda for the New World Order?   As we watch time and again conspiracy theories playing out as fact, perhaps we should pay more attention.

The CIA is rogue.   There are those that think that Soros is actually an operative for the CIA.   Or could Soros be running the CIA?