Weather modification used to be considered a ‘conspiracy theory’, but like many other conspiracies, today it is acknowledged as fact. From the simplistic to the complex, the concept has many useful positives; increasing water supplies, preventing hail and hurricanes, and dousing wildfires. But there are also useful military objectives which are more cynical and deadly in their agenda.
While climate gurus continue to scream ‘the sky is falling’, Harvard has been busily at work the past two years geo-engineering weather thru solar deflection.
China has been manufacturing cloud rain for over a decade, launching silver iodide with rockets and via planes across swathes of the Tibetan Tableau the size of Alaska, the project is considered the largest in the world.
ScoPex is the Harvard experiment which includes the introduction of particles in the stratosphere in order to deflect solar activity away from earth. According to NASA, such a scheme could devastate agriculture. The argument in support of the program is that the positive effects out-weigh the negative impacts. I disagree.
Harvard contends that rising sea levels as a result of global warming will decimate valuable land and millions of homes. The analogy is to ‘chemotherapy’. But even the analogy is flawed given that chemo only works on some people some of the time. By contrast, geo-engineering has been shown to have substantial impacts on weather intensity, weather patterns, and rainfall.
The same issues that the alarmists are now claiming are a result of global warming could in fact be the result of saving the planet from climate change. Perhaps the very technology utilized across the globe to alter weather is actually responsible for creating intensely destructive weather. For example our jet streams are linked to solar radiation, change the solar you alter the jet stream. Air masses push the jet stream around, change the air mass and you have effectively altered the weather pattern. The jet stream pattern has only been monitored since 2000, so identifying changes is only as good as the record exists. But obviously if we suddenly begin inserting particle matter to deflect the sun, the jet stream will be affected.
It stands to reason that geo-engineering and cloud seeding may have far more disruptive ramifications than scientists are willing to reveal. I refer to it as the ‘oops factor’.
While one justification for the manipulation is for the purpose of redirecting or eliminating hurricanes, it is just as likely that the modification could ramp up these storms as well. While Harvard and China represent just two specific projects that are currently being utilized, there are likely hundreds being employed by various nations – none in collaboration with another.
India uses small planes equipped with twelve cylinders. Flying into the belly of a storm cloud, the cylinders are filled with combustible chloride and released at intervals. With agriculture in India failing from lack of water, the Harvard geo-engineering experiment could cause India’s production to fail completely from lack of sunlight.
It is less like chemotherapy and more like a Molotov cocktail.
While scientists had polar views on the effect of geo-engineering, Harvard ignored the negative reactions and sent up its first flood of particulates in early spring 2019.
And despite all the information available regarding these various geo-engineering actions, the media is still attempting to manipulate our understanding of the true cause and causal actions taking place.
“July was earth’s hottest month on record”! The articles go on to actually explain that the ‘record’ they refer to is for the 20th century. In the realm of millions of years, a century is relatively meaningless.
Historically, temperatures were taken manually on land and ships at sea. There were no computers, no standardized measurement system, no sophisticated instruments like we use today. All statistical science has margins of error. But climate scientists fail to provide that margin – ever. In fact, determining temperatures historically did not even include tenths of percentages. Thus to calculate that the global temperature rose by .7’ between 1850 and 2003 could not be factual, it would be a theory. An estimate. As of today, that estimate is .8% based on unproven science that has changed dramatically in its ability to create an accurate model.
In theory, the enhancement of global temperature could align with the advancement of weather manipulation and geo-engineering just as easily as claiming the casual factor is carbon emissions.
According to scientists, the last ice age ended between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago. That would indicate a potential deviation of 10,000 years – not terribly accurate. Scientists claim that the reason the ice age ended was due to a rise in carbon dioxide. Volcanic eruptions create vast plumes of carbon dioxide. Volcanoes exist both on land and undersea. There have been 404 volcanic eruptions since 1883. Since 1980 – there have been 18 volcanic eruptions with a rating of at least VEI of 4.
It is estimated that 200 million tons of carbon are emit into the atmosphere annually by volcanic action.
But even this data is an extrapolation, not a fact. Still it has widely been the accepted causal factor that pulled earth out of its last ice age. Why? Because science has no other explanation.
In other words: based on massive extrapolations, estimates, best guesses, faulty science, and zero historical technology, science has concluded that our planet needs geo-engineering of our natural climate change in order to ‘save the planet’ and ‘save the children’.
And in so doing – may actually wipe out large swathes of agriculture production in order to save a few estimated millions of houses many of which are built of mud and clay.