Ilhan Omar: Links to Al-Shabab, and Muslim Brotherhood… PART II

As if the hypocrisy of Omar Ilhan could not be topped, she continues to prove that her attacks against Trump along with “The Squad”, are rooted in an Agenda of chaos and destruction.

A Canadian journalist moved to her home of Somalia sending pictures of a pristine landscape, and beauty to the beholder in order to prove that the country is being misjudged.   She has been killed in an assassination by Al-Shabab militants (an offshoot of ISIS) in a targeted attack on a hotel.   While her stories were genuine, and her heart was in the right place, her death reveals a truism – Somalia is at war and has been for decades.   The reality is that Somalia was born of warriors and has been the point target of conquest for thousands of years.

Modern history reveals their colonization by the British and French. In the 70’s, after Marxism rose with Russian and Cuban control, Somali asked the US for intervention and help.   While the US helped Somalia build the largest army in Africa to counter the growing communist rule, factions of rebels grew from the discontent and civil war broke out.   It was sometime around 1991-1992 that Ilhan and her family fled opting for the peace and prosperity offered by the US as their ultimate place of refuge.

In the early 2000’s with the rise of Al-Qaeda and ISIS, Al-Shabab moved into Somalia – the leach that sought to devour the country through bombings.   Since 1991, over half a million people have been killed, nearly 300,000 have died of starvation, and still Omar hates all things America. Why?

One would think she would be grateful for our troops sacrificing their lives, for American taxpayers footing the bill to try and save her country from terrorism…

Instead she is calling for Marxist socialism in the US.  Odd…

In 2016, Ilhan went to Somalia and it would appear she is quite a celebrity there given then President up for re-election, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, invited her to appear with him. She had flown from Nairobi to Mogadishu on a plane with former Somali Prime Minister Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed. Hassan is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Then Prime Minister, Mohamed Abdullah Mohamed, is currently the newly elected President of Somali as of 2017.   He moved to the US sometime around 1985 working first in the Somali embassy in DC, before reportedly earning a BA and Masters degree in four years while attending the State University of New York where he remained until 2010. Suddenly, in 2010, he was appointed the Prime Minister of Somalia – it would appear in absentia.

And in 2012, Somalia created a new Constitution. A host of African countries have recently created and adopted new Constitutions including; Ivory Coast, Kenya, Angola, Egypt, Libya, Madagascar, Niger, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe.

In 2006, the Somali branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Islah, formed the Damul Jadiid subdivision branch which openly embraced violence in order to establish an Islamic caliphate. Hassan, a member of Jamiil Damul, appointed like members within senior positions of his government including; justice, social affairs, interior, and ministries of state.   Within this context, Somalia moved away from the African Union and became more aligned with the Middle East.

Upon Abdullah’s surprise election, he appointed a Norwegian-Somali oilman as his Prime Minister, Hassan, Ali Khaire.

Soma Oil and Gas is headquartered in the UK. It’s key people include; Hassan Ali Khaire and Michael Howard.

“In February 2016, a leaked memo, sent by a United Nations watchdog to diplomats in the United Kingdom and Norway, revealed that the executive director for Africa at Soma Oil and Gas was under investigation by the United Nations Monitoring group for Somalia and Eritrea for possible ties to extremist groups in East Africa, including al-Shabaab, which had claimed responsibility for a series of deadly terrorist attacks in Somalia.[17] The UN letter, dated 17 February 2016, showed investigators raised concerns over Khaire’s possible links to extremist groups after obtaining his “electronic contact list”, which it analysed with the cooperation of an unidentified UN member state.”

Al-Shabab is known for its Islamism, jihadism, and anti-Semitism.

Yesterday, Ilhan Omar stated she would introduce a bill to boycott Israel over its actions toward Palestinians.   She was flanked by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian-American.

January 2019, Ilhan Omar publically endorsed the new Somalia President, Mohamed, and shortly thereafter her brother-in-law was appointed Permanent Secretary to Prime Minister Khaire. Omar’s brother-in-law, Mohamed Keynan, is a US citizen.

Nancy Pelosi then nominated Omar to a seat on the US Foreign Affairs Committee.

Security Executive Agent Directive 4 of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence states that “Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include: (a) contact, regardless of method, with a foreign family member… or other person who is a citizen of or resident in a foreign country if that contact creates a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, inducement, manipulation, pressure, or coercion.”. According to Transparency International, Somalia has been ranked last among all nations on earth for the last 11 years for the “Corruption Perceptions index”.”

Omar’s Biography becomes more and more interesting as tributaries emerge with The Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Shabab.   Her rise becomes much more obvious, and planned.  Where is Huma Abedin? 

CLIMATE Change: The Crystal Ball Theory

As Climate Changes, the media is all a frenzy with more dire predictions, more exhaustive data, and little scientific truth.

I am always thrilled to discover that climate science is reportedly a 50-50 chance crystal ball venue.   If climatologists can’t accurately predict the weather within fifteen minutes of its event, how can we really accept that they know exactly what happened six hundred billion years ago and 1000 years into the future?

The answer is in the word ‘science’ which until recent history was defined as a philosophy, a ‘prediction’.

When the data was disproven over and over again, global warming morphed into ‘Climate Change’. And no one missed a beat. Except for the fact that climate does change, and likely has since the existence of earth, so making the shift opened a truism, but not necessarily one that supported doomsday.

So what’s the real beef?   Why the paranoia alarms?

It’s complicated.

Like most wars, climate change created a mass chaotic frenzy that resulted in a select group of elite benefactors making beaucoup dollero on the heels of fear.   When a war is over, history typically reveals the ridiculous reasoning for instigating the war in the first place.   WWI some stupid ArchDuke guy was assassinated – and thus 100 million + people had to pay with their lives.   But within that catastrophic event billions were made.   When there isn’t a good war, invent a catastrophe: hence Global Warming aka Climate Change.

After WWII, there was the Korean War, Vietnam War, and then when that was tabled, we were catapulted into the Chicken Little Science of the coming ‘Ice-Age’! It made for massive paranoia, and mucho dollero before fizzling and being shelved in the library of science stupidity and oops factor. Never mind.

In a world replete in fake wars, fake catastrophes, fake news, fake media, and fake religion, one would think that we would become immune and realize the one absolute question:   who is making money off the fakery?

In 1977 Time Magazine published a cover piece titled, “How To Survive The Coming Ice-Age.” It offered 51 things one can do to make a difference. And while the media is desperately attempting to justify the trend, the article, the chaotic fear that was instigated, they refuse to take responsibility for – lying. Instead, they are today busily trying to defend these doomsday scenarios as simply a media creation.

Huh?   The media fabricated a story without Scientific justification? How dastardly!

There was the nuclear war scare in the 1960’s wherein children were instructed to hide under their desks so as to circumvent the effects of the imminent nuclear bomb… And we all diligently went thru the drills believing that hiding under a desk would save us from death.

Each generation creates a ‘boogey-man’.

But the impact, the force, the deliberation and contempt exuded by our media for The People continues to be the real ‘boogey man’.   And likely, history will attempt to justify the current obsession with “Climate Change”.

Yes. Climate Changes.   In fact, graphs created by these same scientific onions graph climate for billions of years based on – gasp – tree rings, and then spew it as a truism. Really, that’s all you’ve been able to utilize for your pseudo science theory?

Why do they create a boogey-man at all?

Simplistically it reverts to basic psychology; united we stand, divided we fall. If they can create a united demon, they can control the meme.   Of course, this can be done by both good guys and bad guys and therein lies the fix.   Who to believe?

The media altered the landscape when it became the most corrupt of outlets that we could possibly imagine. The propaganda and psychological ploy was honed.   And a vast portion of society willingly jumped aboard the bandwagon.

Hollywood became enamored with this political power given they had already usurped the moral and ethical power over their subjects. And besides, there was money to be made on the sidelines as one jettisoned about creating a massive global ‘footprint’.

But it does get a bit more complicated.

Most of the world’s greatest country’s have implemented their own version of climate manipulation for decades. Fundamentally altering the natural course of nature, we have inadvertently created a monster – a Frankenstein. In order to deflect that oops factor, Global Warming frenzy was the best means of the Porky Pig routine, “bede, bede, bede”.   Shift the blame, make money on the shift, and by the time society figures it out, I’ll be dead.   Whew!

Even as I write this, the weather forecast for my town has changed five times – for today.   SO much for science. I suggest they need to dust their crystal balls and ask the birds.

Clint Detention Center – Not Fit For Illegal Immigrants…

DeBlasio claims that the Clint detention center for illegal immigrants “does not look like a place where families are supposed to be…” That would be true!

Kamala Harris is telling children that they are all “born leaders, everyone is a born leader.”   One child looks totally confused and walks away.

“Protect the children!”   The mantra cry!

“They are marching around like a prison.” DeBlasio is confused.   He would seem to believe they should be holed up in the Ritz eating caviar…

The ‘viral video’ posted by Joaquin Castro that purportedly shows the dastardly conditions of a detention center is really just a solitary shot of one portion of a room with a half dozen women all sitting on the floor in brand new sleeping bags.  I imagine the media crew and makeup artists filled the remainder of the room.

Another ‘viral video’ shows a shower that Castro says is too small and dirty. It is a makeshift shower. Like one found at a US park campground…  He doesn’t like it.

I wonder if Castro has ever used a ‘porta-potty’ because I doubt they would meet his copious standards despite the fact that most citizens of the US who have visited a festival, music venue, park or recreation center have been required to make use of these facilities.

Given Castro supports everything illegal, it would do his sense of justice good to visit a few prisons and let him sit in a room with a half dozen or so inmates discussing their leadership qualities…

Cortez doesn’t like the fact that the sink is linked to the indoor toilet and claims that this means the immigrants are drinking toilet water. Obviously, Cortez is unaware that this same system is utilized in just about every jail cell across the US…

And while the rather bizarre Facebook recount of border agents being lewd and graphically racist has been cited by CNN and Politico, there are a few unanswered questions:   1) these videos seem to have initially been created during the Obama administration under the auspices and knowledge of the then Obama appointed official in charge of Border Patrol who has since been replaced by Trump.   2)   If this Facebook Group was ‘secret’ and private, how did Ocasio gain access?   These groups are accessed by invitation only.   3)   While Ocasio makes ominous claims about what is stated in these dastardly postings, the posts she reveals are rather innocuous… ”let me know how she looks in real life…”   Not exactly the vast number of death threats she claims. Odd.

Castro represents Texas 20th District which is 70% Hispanic, and has voted Democrat since 1956. And while Castro tauts his image as being from an immigrant family and raised by a single mom, he was born and raised in Texas by two parents, and somehow managed to go to Stanford and Harvard. His parents did not officially marry, however, they were ‘together’, his father a math teacher and his mother a volunteer at protests. His mother supported the campaign of Angela Davis, a communist activist and member of the Black Panther Party.  OUCH!   His twin brother worked in Obama’s Cabinet for Housing and Urban Development. Neither twin has worked outside of politics or held any ‘job’.   A bit odd.

Like Ocasio, Ilhan and Obama, Castro would seem to have appeared out of nowhere from a less than middle class family with little to define his life except that he managed to attend the most elite and costly schools in the country.

But with the detention centers burgeoning with captured illegals, and Trump giving Pelosi’s Democrats two weeks to find an alternate solution to the planned deportation, they, the Democrats, have done nothing. As such, their two weeks are up and the media was called in to help create a staged scene of chaos and inequity to deflect and disguise the real issue.

Still, not one Democrat has actually put up a dime to help these poor illegal immigrants with the exception of George Soros and the Catholic Doicese. Their help comes in the form of a debit card, a cell phone, new clothes and a possible bonus should they make it into the fray of the United States that they abhor so vehemently.

Instead of crossing the border with camera crews, security detail, and guards, perhaps these Democrat lovelies should spend a month or two in El Salvador or Honduras volunteering their time, allocating their wages, and helping these people who they so dearly adore…

And while all the MSM outlets stated they would black out any July 4th parade spectacles given Independence Day is now deplorable day, they managed to highlight Biden, Beto and DeBlasio as they marched in Independence, Iowa amidst a handful of paid supporters woefully forced to carry Biden signs for the camera frenzy.   Hehe. Independence boasts a population of roughly 6,000, 97% of whom are white. The county voted overwhelmingly Trump in the Presidential election.

The detention center fray is an obvious distraction given the candidates really have no platform or script that would distinguish them from one another. They have instead become mannequins who mouth the same, scream the same, lie the same, and lead relatively nontransparent lives while busily counting their $$$$$$.  Each one has utilized a ghost writer to write their biography.  I have not the pleasure of knowing anyone who has read any of their books, and most are even unaware a book exists.  Perhaps Soros is buying all the copies as a means of aiding their ‘fundraising’ efforts.

Then again Kamala has quickly learned how to spend her newfound wealth.   In 2015 it was revealed that her choice of hotels cost $850 to $1750 nightly, paid for by campaign financing and $2000 to $4500 for first class airfare. All the while claiming to be black, when she isn’t, a working class stiff, ummm, she isn’t, and pledging to leverage the US debt into the $100 trillion mark.   I’m sure CNN will hold a blackout of that transparency…

Fake News, Fake Polls: Divided We Stand!

The other day I was researching various polling entity’s predictions on the Democrat candidates and while I stared at the screen, the numbers for one poll published and completed by Politico for June 30th – changed. Not by 1 or 2 points, but it completely altered the numbers! When I first recorded the numbers it showed: Biden 26%, Warren 16%, Sanders 12%, Buttegieg 9% and Harris 7%.   The altered numbers reverted to: Biden 33%, Sanders 19%, Harris 12%, Warren 12% and Buttegieg 6%.

Obviously, this bought and paid for poll did not align with what the Powers That Be wanted it to say, and thus it was reinvented. But then Politico is a mouthpiece for the Washington Post and New York Times.

The Economist has emerged as a ‘reputable’ polling agency… owned by the Rothschilds it is a mouthpiece for all things Soros. The other ‘major’ polling outfit is Gravis Marketing which advertises itself as having ‘the lowest price guarantee’.   Of course there is CNN – need I say more.

When did polls become ‘fake news’?   Once upon a time, they were looked at with some respect has having an authoritative approach. Today, they have morphed into the genre of The National Enquirer along with the rabid fact-checkers like Snopes.   Snopes has degraded itself to such an extent that a weejee board is likely more accurate than their staff of one.

I came across a list of fake websites, or fake news sites and was equally humored.   Each site that was labeled as such came with a reasoning, and that reasoning was nearly always ‘pro-Trump’.

This has become the era of UN Ambassadors that includes such educated notables as Gweneth Paltrow, Ashley Judd, Leonardo DeCaprio, Nicole Kidman, etc… all radical liberals.   Of course conservatives deride the UN, they are a defunct organization spending millions to do – nothing. In essence, they are a subsidiary of Hollywood. And everyone Hollywood is starry eyed at the glamorized fake reputation that an ambassadorship conveys.

Fake News: Fake news is news, stories or hoaxes created to deliberately misinform or deceive readers. … Fake news stories can deceive people by looking like trusted websites or using similar names and web addresses to reputable news organizations. 

What is a ‘trusted website’?   Who has been at the core of ‘propaganda’?

According to this definition, the CIA and FBI would be the core progenitors of fake news which is supplied to the Washington Post and New York Times. CNN, NBC, WAPO, and NYTimes are no longer considered ‘trusted’, therefore they are at the core of fake news. They deliberately misinform.

The other day I sited The Epoch Times and was derided because it was a conservative leaning media outlet.   Because it was conservative, it was considered fake. Therefore, any media outlet that has partisanship, which would be every media outlet, would by definition be – fake.

Hollywood has created a world stage of fakery and illusion.

Kamala Harris is running for President and yet everything she does and says is plotted and graphed by the Cabal. Her history is white-washed. Her views are puppeted.   Even her skin tone has been altered to appear darker since her days with Willie Brown.   Her very being has been supplanted and she allows this. She has a choice.

Who is funding Harris?

Law firms and Hollywood.   Law Firms: Paul Weiss (who also is funding Booker – hedging his bets), Venable LLP, Ziffren Brittenham specializing in entertainment law, Lowenstein Sandler, and Gibson Dunn and Crutcher are at the forefront. Entertainment: Warner-Media Group, 21st Century Fox, Walt Disney Company and Creative Artists Agency.   This is not coincidental, this is deliberate, controlled and designed. This is a script, acting lessons, coaching, a stage and a three act play.

While Ocasio plays the game from a parlor room, Harris is on Broadway.

They are one and the same.

Biden’s primary fund raiser was attorney, Tom McInerney, who recently revoked his support and claimed others would likely follow. Why? Biden played the fool at the last debate.   It is likely they will move their money to Harris despite her own gaffs and bedding partners. Lest we forget, Obama was a cocaine dealer and Hollywood thought that was just fine and dandy – candy.

The recent narrative is that Trump has a duty to unite this country…   to somehow parlay socialists, liberals, and conservatives into one giant pot of handshaking, back slapping, hunkerers.   Ain’t gonna happen.   Ever. The integration of parties cannot, by definition, ever unite.  At least not in a unit that is a country.   The only way the Marxist/Socialist Nazi’s united was by war and obliteration.   And that is the agenda.

Divided we stand.  

Trump’s Visit to the UK: A Spectacle of Alice In Wonderland

President Trump is in the UK and the media is doing everything they can to uphold their crass, undignified, wormwood agenda. Oddly, while vilifying everything down to Melania’s dress, they continue to punctuate the meme that Trump is unpresidential.

The British media, a spattering of royals, the London mayor, and a hodge-podge of populace who pride themselves on being proper and dignified, have instead invoked their dark side and clamored to be all things crass and CNN.

Chuck Todd of NBC went so far as to declare that Trump is interfering in the British elections by supporting Boris Johnson’s candidacy.   No president or prime minister in history has ever evoked a reprisal for supporting a particular candidate in an election in a foreign country. Ever.   In fact, Macron, Merkel, May, Khan, Trudeau, etc… have all voiced rather belligerent offensive statements toward Trump.

And somehow the vast hypocrisy is lost on a intellect that has either been abducted by aliens, or morphed into the insanity of drugs.

London’s mayor, Khan has been an outspoken critic vilifying Trump since he began running for US President, but apparently that’s okay.   Meghan Markel had the audacity to speak in ‘nasty’ terms about Trump, and that’s okay.   Prince Harry is sulking.   And a Queen who has spent her entire life living a fully funded extravagant lifestyle simply because she was born, while actually ‘doing’ nothing is revered.

Lady Gaga met Queen Elizabeth dressed as the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland. And that’s okay.   Because in reality, Lady Gaga was making a statement that within the realm of Obama, we were living in the land of Alice.

Historically, Jackie Kennedy voiced her displeasure with the Queen, finding her petty and self obsessed.   The media was largely quiet because, – she was Jackie Kennedy.

Obama committed gaffe after gaffe when in the presence of the Queen, but those moments were simply justified as; ‘he is just human’.   And Michelle continually gaffed with her choice of dresses sometimes matching the Queen and other times donning hot pink. OUCH!

Imagine if the US held such protest rallies mocking and denigrating the Queen…   We would be held to the highest tribunal and court martialed.   The British media would go berserk denouncing the American pilgrims as ignorant, crass, and beneath basic decorum.

Protesting Trump because of his anti-abortion and immigration stance, making obscene and verbose statements with regard to Trump, Melania, and Ivanka, this is the British representation of ‘honor and integrity’.   The same people who decry that Trump is not of the royal family and unacceptable consider these public statements British decorum.

But these are truly the days of Alice whereby Michelle Obama was called the most powerful woman in the world and a fashion and fitness icon… by the British media. (I imagine the Queen was not pleased given her demeanor as Global Highness).

But the British Royals have become rather odd in their recent evolution, preferring Hollywoodites to statesmen, crooners to scientists, and comic book characters to intellectuals.

Knighthood used to be an honor bestowed on a man for his service to the monarch or church. Most often it was a military grant levied for valor and sacrifice. But it has morphed into a bit of a joke wherein the likes of Bono, Bush, McCartney, Stewart, Caine, Elton-John, Geldof, and other celebrities have become the nom-de-pleur beneficiaries.   As a result, the British Monarchy has made Knighthood a veritable Academy Award for celluloid heroes.   And exchanged dignity for a Shakespearean Comedy wherein the actors don Masks.

In the end, Trump’s delightful joke in referring to Meghan Markel as a great American princess was lost on the celluloids, the British, and CNN for its truism in the world of Alice.  

Elections: Toxic Masculinity or Liberal Fear

Phraseology flying, the slogan, ‘Toxic Masculinity’ has been thrown around like a sucker punch used to berate and escalate – well toxic attitudes.  Because that’s exactly what it does – it creates another division, another form of hypocritical hate speech, driven predominantly by left leaning women and – sigh, men.  Of course men say it as though they are mind deployed aliens whose brains have been harvested, much like the radical ‘White Men’ slander punches.

While the word was first used in 2004 in a book discussing different types of men and their masculine tendencies, also called hegemonic masculinity, it didn’t become a  popular demonizing phrase until 2013 when it was defined in Geek Feminism Wiki as ‘one of the ways in which Patriarchy is harmful to men’.

Since then it has been liberally dribbled about by Hollywood and the MSM to socially demean certain men, and sometimes men in general, much like the ‘white men’ phenomena.  We hear Robert DeNiro spew spittle and profanity about our President, calling on people to harm him and anyone associated with him because of Trump’s ‘toxic masculinity’.  Of course DeNIro completely misses the carnival mirror depicting himself that makes most of us nonHollywooders cringe with creepiness as he is most obviously ‘toxic masculinity’ in it’s full frontal explosion.

I read it in obscure places like Mike Frost’s blog, a Reverend and academic at a school in Australia. Of course, in his small opinion, it would seem fodder to make commentary about – Trump.  I commented on one of Mr. Frost’s blog posts – once – only for him to grandiosely attempt to ridicule me and denounce me personally.  Why?  Because I offered a ‘different opinion’ regarding his claims.  In other words, Mr. Frost was exhibiting ‘toxic masculinity’.

I have been the victim of it on even the most bizarre of platforms – dating sites.  Where instead of acceptance and conversation, I became the brunt of attack and hatred.  Toxic masculinity.  But not from Trump, not from conservatives, in fact it seems to be most oppressively used by Liberal minded men and women in a clearly hypocritical, log in the eye fashion.

It comes on the flames of liberals claiming they are about peace, love and inclusion while finding all kinds of people they feel shouldn’t be included in the inclusion:  white men, conservative women, conservative men, conservative black men, masculine men, feminine women, stay at home moms, anyone wearing a hat that states Make America Great, any animal owned by anyone conservative… because we are the hate mongers.

Since 2015, there have been well over 170 protests (based on days not cities) against Donald Trump. Most of them are not about anything except – we don’t like you.  That would be over a period of roughly 3 years, or roughly five each month.

During Obama’s entire two term administration there were… 8.  We didn’t much care for him.  We didn’t like his policies.  We didn’t like his agenda.  We simply turned him – off.

The peaceful vs the peaceful…

Conservatives don’t attend protests often.   Rallies? Yes, they are positive events, they signal support and victory and hurrah.  But Protests and riots are about demonizing, threatening, violence and destruction.  If we have an issue, it is best served in a written content.

These are both men who were elected by The People.

Hitler advocated for violence.  Soros advocates for violence.  Eric Holder, Maxine, Cher, Handler, Kathy  whatshername, Behar, Robert deNiro, and a multitude of Hollywood Liberals advocate for assault and violence.  It is an obvious linkage.  And yet, still, conservatives do not protest.  We attend rallies to support someone, but most often the masks, the violence, is perpetrated in the name of – peaceful Democrat/Socialists.

The left is advocating Revolution.  Why?  Because they didn’t get their way…  They are superior, and thus feel that they should have their way.   It is an infantile behavior.  In the name – of peace, tolerance and hugs for all.

In essence it is born of fear.  A fear of losing their ‘toxic Hollywoodism’.  Their feelings of superiority and fear of the truth that will ultimately be revealed that is far more devastating than just the couch fame protocol which we have all been guilty of accepting, breeds – fear.

I imagine the Hollywood Executives, the one’s whose hands are bloodied in money, are going nuts as their profits plummet amid the childish antics of their $$$$ pool of actors as they make public fools of themselves and derail 50% of the viewer base.  Not exactly a ‘business’ move, but then they are after all – ‘entertainers’.  Nothing more.    And in that – protests are simply another means of entertaining – themselves.

The Kinks coined it quite well in a phrase in which they depicted Hollywood as ‘celluloid heroes’, in other words, fake, transparent, not real.

It is the conservatives in Hollywood who hide.  They are the ones who fear blacklisting, rapprochement, and hate from the ‘pacifist liberals’.

Oddly, all of this multiple decades long globalism, fascism and toxicity, is blamed on Trump.  Find a person to horde all the blame for every wrong doing during the history of mankind, is the mantra.  I doubt there is any person, any couple, in the history of mankind who has been tasked with rising above the acrimonial amount of blame and hysteria and rancid comments as Donald and Melania Trump.

Q?  A radical supporter of Truth.

Conservatives.  A hodge podge of Americans wanting to know the Truth.   Feeling energized.  Feeling confident.  And weary of decades of subservience.

This is the moment of Truth.  Do you stand for your self?  Or do you stand with dignity, honor and God?   This is NOT toxic masculinity – it is Toxic Hollywoodarity, and they are masks, fake faces, celluloid, speaking scripts, and wishing they were something more than a lowly actor.

Because, in the end, they will be – left behind.

What Do You Want?

We all have an aspiration, somewhere, whether buried or on the surface, it exists, it is simply a matter of whether it is recognized and it is acted upon.   My time may be limited, yet, my desire to have this one success, simmers, and then sometimes bursts like a volcanic lava flow in a small pool.  You see, I am not largess.  I don’t need a stage.  And if it doesn’t happen, I will not be devastated.  It is simply, – a wish.   “I wish upon a star…”.  DO you?

Lately, it has become an interesting question given the attitudes that prevail in the news media.  The expletives that spew are rampant and far beyond the PG-13 television rating.   The lack of respect is … challenging.  Challenging because I really don’t understand this place.  I don’t understand the arrogance that believes respect is not available or deserving…   Who are you to decide?   You decry the religious right who declare judgment, and then become judgment personified!   How dare you!

So what is your aspiration?  What would be your dream in a perfect world – if you could have ‘ONE’ wish.

The only caveat is the caveat that you may not declare yourself judge and jury, you may declare yourself ‘an opinion’.  And no, your one wish is not that you can have a 1000 or 1 million wishes.   I tried that!

Who decides?  Who dictates the rules?  IS it really the government or is it another shadow within the rule of Order that was established hundreds of years ago?

Why is it so important that it succeed?

I imagine that at one point there was an honorable reason for the rule.  But, like a telephone conversation, the rule morphed, it’s definition altered, and soon, it represented little of its original intent.  And was in fact, virtually unrecognizable.

And as the game depicts, if we can’t keep the truth alive for two to three sharings, how can we possibly keep it honest for a day?

For by the time truth is revealed, it has been ravaged of tens of storms, and perhaps thousands of tracts.  Leaving truth to be a mere thread of the cloth.   And without the entire garment, it covers very little.

Peace, Truth and The Peacemakers Calling

We are called to be ‘peacemakers’. But what is Peace? How is it defined? Is it the absence of conflict or is it the aggressive actionable stance of creating relationship?

We are all ‘a chip off the block’, fragments of God, with jagged edges and jigsaw puzzle pieces. But when we come together as a family, with mother, father and children, we smooth these edges and become more like God. The pieces fit together to make a larger more whole piece closer, more like, the image of God. When we fragment the family, our edges are sharper, more pronounced, and our piece withers in a kaleidescope of warped imagery.

Peacemakers do not avoid conflict they confront it with love and compassion, they resolve it and use the strength of God to absolve the issue each and every time. To hold it like a knight, not a coward, to seek the truth within the conflict and make it known. This world we live in is an example of what it means to not face the truth, because it is the truth that will create peace. Taking responsibility. Owning what is your sin. Looking at the log that gauges your eye.

The UN was created in 1945 to end conflict and bring peace to the world. But it has failed miserably. In fact, between 1946 and 2013, there were 331 incidences of armed conflict. Why? Because the method, the rationale for prevention is not rooted in the core cause – individual emptiness, a Godlessness that permeates the very heart and soul of humanity. How can we possibly stave off conflict if we don’t address the truth of the cause?

When I Googled, ‘how to achieve peace’, most of the entries were Buddhist in nature and reflected a desire for inner peace. There were a few political adjuncts that claimed peace was achieved through freedom and a barrage of solid rules imposed by government. Other sites stressed ‘the avoidance of war’ as a means of peace. Still another site claimed that satisfying one’s own desires first will ultimately lead to peace with others. YIKES!

But men are flawed, and when they rely on their own person to achieve that which has never been known to mankind, they will fail. Again and again. And yet, we continue to believe that man is the solution. That avoidance is the solution. That independence is the solution. That if we avoid conflict, it will disappear.

Ten thousand years later, it still has not worked. So why do we keep butting our heads against this wall of thorns when it has never worked?

The false premise is that since man is the creator of chaos, man must be the source of peace. From the outside. But it cannot happen when the outside is ruled by pride and arrogance and vengeance and immorality. It simply will not work.

Then of course, there is the step-by-step instructions on how to achieve peace with ‘no compromising’ being fundamental to the doctrine. But ‘no compromising’ begs pride, arrogance, rightness, the moral depravity that creates the conflict in the first place. It is a very naïve approach to a very complicated issue. Recently, my husband invoked the ‘Christians don’t compromise’ doctrine in the midst of a fight. Really? I had to look that one up.

The first problem came up in the definition of compromise. Some believed it to mean ‘caving in’, while others observed that it was a give and take, a leaning in and out. I suppose they are both right in a sense, but circumstances are so diverse and broad, an absolute is definitely NOT the rationale.

Biblically, the phrase, “Christians Don’t compromise”, is addressed in the Bible, but it is in the context of there is no compromise with regard to God. No compromise with regard to the commandments of God. And no compromise with regard to sin. It’s a bit like the statement, “I’m sort of pregnant”. You can’t be in a gray area within these black and whites. But that does not mean that there aren’t vast gray areas of issue to mediate within Christianity that are a product of individual circumstances. So to make the statement in the context of a marriage dispute is somewhat …well, out of context.

My husband attempted to invoke ‘truth’ as his and his alone within the frame of not compromising. Truth belonged to him and no one else.  Uh oh…   And in so doing completely missed the point. There are hard truths, absolute facts, and then there are perspective truths, subject to interpretation. By invoking his truth, he was avoiding conflict (his fallback) by refusing to hear me. In so doing, we had no peace, what we had was a dictatorship rule.

While this earth may never find worldly peace, we are still called to understand that we must try. We are called to try as peacemakers.  Not peace as a form of government rule and protocol and doctrine and punishment and judgment, but peace that is based on the values and morals and integrity and spirituality of God and His Word.

And ultimately, Peace will only be had when we have Truth – not your truth or my truth – but THE Truth.