Covid 19 mutations

CYBER WARFARE! Russians and Bikers Destroy RAND Corporation?

Posted on by Helena

The Russians are back in the spotlight after having the audacity to destroy CoVid 19 patient records in the UK. Apparently, they only targeted records of patients who had previously been diagnosed and recovered from CoVid and not the records of those actually vaccinated.   As a result, the UK can not verify those people and provide them with the necessary vaccine pass certificate…   The Russians apparently did not ask for any ransom, they simply wanted to destroy records just for funzies.

How and why the UK Ministry is befuddled.  

Of course this was done 2 months ago in May – and the HSE is just now learning that the records no longer exist. AH!    This is all just in time to interfere in a qualified reopening of restaurants and bars ONLY for those immunized – or recovered.   Albeit the recovered will now have to be jabbed.  DANG NABBIT!

Who oh who would benefit from such a dastardly deed? And how could NHS possibly determine it was ‘The Russians”?   They can’t – it is simply another tool of deflection in order to ramp up jabs. The fact that Pfizer has already claimed a third jab is now necessary to fight the Delta variant despite their being hundreds of variants according to science is further poppycock!   If the initial CoVid no longer exists as the virus mutates, like every other virus known to man, how can Big Pharma possibly stay ahead?

They can’t.

Germany’s ‘spy chief’ has stated that the coming election will likely be attacked by cyber criminals operating in foreign intelligence agencies.   Although the ‘spy chief’ did not identify which foreign intelligence, all media outlets agree it must be – RUSSIA!   Why?

It is interesting that ALL cyber attacks are determined to originate in Russia. Obviously that would indicate their rather overwhelming superiority in cyber warfare. It would also reveal that Western cyber security is relatively backward, obsolete, and defunct.   Or they could simply be inferior, negligent, and stupid.  Either way – the conclusion that the western world is at the mercy of Russia – does not bode well for the US – The US Military – or the US CIA.   Oops.

According to NBC, America’s cyber warriors are spread thin.   A shortage of workers they claim.   An uptick in hacks – they claim.   They are calling it an epidemic despite the attacks racheting up over 750,000 last year costing taxpayers $1.5 billion.   It is likely they will call it the next ‘Pandemic’!   A National Emergency Order will be attached to CoVid and anyone not vaccinated will be hacked.   Right?

While they note that these hackers are ransom gangs – all coming from Russia, not one cyber hack in the US or EU is apparently adept enough to mitigate and disrupt the flow. Even Biden was unable to communicate a cease and desist order to Putin.   Perhaps he mumbled and jumbled and his humpty dumpty couldn’t be put back together again.  But it does foretell an absolute disfunctioning IT America.  As in – crap twalette water.

RAND Corporation has entered the fray and developed a super-duper model for ‘predicting’ cyber threats!   Imagine being in the middle of a massive ground battle in Afghanistan and your commanding officer ‘predicts’ everything will be fine …   Or perhaps he might ‘predict’ that the enemy will come from the east…   What happened to knowledge?   Spies?   Intelligence?   Instead, a crystal ball is the favored defense of your commanders.  Personally, I would defect.

But then RAND would seem to be providing Psaki’s talking points with a Report titled:   “CoVid 19 Disinformation and Hateful Extremism”.   The Report detailing these ‘hateful Extremists’ is 92 pages and highlights the fact that social media is the main proliferation source especially given everyone is home and bored due to Communist Lockdowns!   The report was done in collaboration with IPSOS – a marketing and polling company.   So now we have RAND using predictive analyses by a polling company to detect hateful extremists – why not simply ask all the Karen’s?   That would be on par in their “Scientific Pursuits” of idiocracy!

Apparently, the Report states that hateful extremism can give rise to hate crime!   Identifying these extremists, RAND, of course, labels them right wing conspiracy nuts.   The Report states that eliminating funding for these ‘extremist right wing nut groups’ is paramount.   Fact checking is also highlighted as a means of deterrence via – censorship.

Taking a bizarre broad leap, RAND identifies criminal biker gangs as the predominant right way identity.   Ultimately, RAND determines that more funding for their research would be the greatest means for overcoming this Hateful Extremism – as in mucho doleros for mios at the expense of all those Deplorables!   Secondly, ‘fining’ these social media platforms would help increase censorship.   And lastly, widespread humiliation and shaming techniques of anyone determined to be a right winger would force them into the closet.  RAND>

RAND was founded by ‘Hap’ Arnold, whose nickname Happy originated during his stint in Hollywood as a stunt flyer.   Today’s RAND CEO and President, Michael Rich, a lawyer, apparently prefers CNN and USA Today as his choice of interviewers.  RAND was initially all things Military.   Today, they espouse 12 different specialties ranging from; children, families and communities, to infrastructure, to data sciences, national security, and everything in-between.

Their Trustees include: Chuck Hagel, a slate of lawyers, Bloomingdales CEO???, Media, Hedge Funds and Banks.   Hardly the slate of intellectuals it espouses.

Notable Client Funding comes from: Qatar, MacArthur Foundation, George Bush Foundation, UN, World Bank, NATO, Google, China and NIH.   Among hundreds.   But – they are ‘nonpartisan’ and have no political agenda unless of course you are not a liberal Greenie advocating Communism and Marxism for all!

While Russia is declared a criminal motorcycle right winger deplorable, China is envisioned as a great universal partner for future indoctrination in enhancing Communism as a means of slavery vs elitism.

While RAND would seem to think that the 750,000+ cyber attacks are inevitable and beyond the acumen of US specialists, apparently Hateful Deplorables are much more of a threat to be annihilated.   And thus We Are Laid Bare at the mercy of cyber warfare.

CoVid Vaccine Stats – Data Algorithm; A Sampling Survey of Limited Data

Posted on by Helena

The CDC claims it uses 4 portals in determining annual deaths and causes.   NVSS, National Vital Statistics System is one such source.   According to NVSS, the last year for which data was available was 2018 wherein 2,839,205 people died.   They claim the information comes from The National Center for Health Statistics.   NCHS claims their means of determination is based on surveys and estimates.   The last report they released was dated 2019 for 2018.   An interesting notation was added in their ‘comparison tables with prior years’:

Starting with 2018 data, race-specific estimates (dashed lines) are tabulated according to the 1997 “Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity” and are not completely comparable with estimates for earlier years. Persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race.

According to these ‘statistics’ the death rate for all causes has remained relatively static since 2008.   Which corresponds to the type of statistics compiled by the CDC for flu deaths – a static number for 20 years that is stipulated to be somewhere in the neighborhood of 20,000-60,000.

In conducting the “survey” sample, the method utilized by Vital Health Statistics, they claim the sample size for Blacks, Asians and Hispanics are twice the size of whites. Survey sample sizes conducted by NCHS vary from 5,000 to 30,000 with a 60%-85% response.

No statistics have been quantified for 2019 or 2020 according to these ‘source’ websites.   So how is it that the CDC claims to have the death rate numbers for 2019 and 2020 and 2021 when the analysis has yet to be done according to their very own agencies?      Short answer – they don’t.   They create ‘provisional estimates’.   While claiming their vital statistics are 11 months post the end of the data year, it would appear they are quite backlogged given they still haven’t found the data for 2019!

Oddly, the provisional estimate for 2020 data tacked on to the provisional data for 2019 records a possible increase in total deaths by nearly exactly 500,000.   According to their ‘provisional count’ it is deferred as:

When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death – or when it is listed as a “probable” or “presumed” cause — the death is coded as U07.1. This can include cases with or without laboratory confirmation.

In addition, doctors have noted that even a death certificate is not a truly viable source.   In order to determine the cause an autopsy would have to be completed – which is rare. Prior to 1970, 60% of deaths resulted in an autopsy. Today the number has decreased to well below 5%.

How are vaccinated numbers determined?

Currently, they are loosely based on the number of vaccines requested by 64 jurisdictions registered within the tracking system.   Unused and wasted vaccines are supposed to be reported as well. However there is no site available to the public to verify the actual reporting.   According to the updated version of the data compilation requirement, the recipient’s name and address must be included by the providers.

Some of the Foundations that support the funding for the CDC through their foundation include: Merck, Novartis, Open Society, Pfizer, Sergei Brin (Google co-founder), UN, Foundation to Promote Open Societies, Abbot Lab, Bloomberg, Microsoft, OROVAX, Johnson & Johnson Pharma and a host of pharma companies all bent on their lobbying for ‘promotion’.   Of course, one of the more prominent is – GAVI, aka Bill Gates, a divorced man. Always front and center!

The sheer multitude of companies, foundations, and organizations all vying for their own financial perk is perhaps in the hundreds.   The idea that the CDC is nonpolitical is absurd at best, and disgusting in truth!   Their alliances have no basis in actual science, and instead promote whatever ideology their hundreds of partners deem best for their Money.

To accept their vaccination rates would imply acceptance of their Case and Death ‘with maybe CoVid’ rates.   Given a CDC estimate of roughly 160million having submitted to 2 vaccines based on algorithms, surveys, and random samplings of membership data extrapolated to the entire US – what would be the corresponding truth?  

SARS-Cov20 Vaccine Ingredient Toxicity

Posted on by Helena

World:

There are four or five new strains of the CoVid virus!   Stay Home. Lock your door. Hide under your Desk!

People:

What are the symptoms of the new strains?

World:

Same as the original virus only they are of different percentages.   For example, coughing is now determined to be in 35% of cases versus 28% in the original strain.

People:

Dastardly!   But aren’t the symptoms the same for seasonal flu? H1N1?   SARS?  

World:

Yes. But this is different…   Because the seasonal flu mutates which is why a flu shot is required every year.

People:

But every virus mutates rapidly so by the time any shot is given, according to you it’s effectiveness is no longer valid which is why you try again the following year…  So if the virus has already mutated then how can the shot be effective?

World:

Yes that’s true but the CoVid vaccine is good for all mutations but the South African one…we think, maybe, it could be… but we can’t guarantee anything because we actually haven’t done any real studies yet.

People:

But if you haven’t done any real studies why would I get the vaccine now that it is based on the original virus?

World:

Just in case because you have a 2% chance of becoming infected with …something…

AH!

According to the CDC for the last four years the seasonal flu shot has contained the exact same viruses:   A Group = H1N1 and H3N2, and B Group =    Yamagata and Victoria.   For those years, again according to CDC algorithms, the effectiveness rate of the vaccine was 29% to a high of 48%.  Yet for CoVid – the effectiveness is somehow 95%…  how odd.   The Malaria vaccine is between 30% and 50% effective.

A virus mutates naturally at a high rate.   Ultimately herd immunity phases out the impact of the virus which still lives but is now simply strangled by our defense mechanisms.   This was why it was so essential to manufacture a vaccine as quickly as possible – because the window of infection was very small.

But when reading the dialogue from medical sources, everything is a hypothesis, it is like a detergent ad.   AARP: “Some research appears to show that maybe…” or, WHO:   “Mutations are a happenstance that occur naturally and don’t have any impact on the properties of the virus.”

But wait – if mutations don’t change the virus why do we get the same flu shot every year for the same strains of the original virus that has been mutating for a decade?

And here’s a good one: “New study finds that SARS-Cov mutated in March 2020… “dominated by one specific variant bearing a unique mutation in the gene needed for making its RNA copies.”   So if SARS-Cov had already mutated, before it was even identified, was the vaccine based on the mutant?

Globally, there are 800 specimens of this virus mutation – GASP – so we better hide in our closets!

And then there is Pfizer which has announced that they have conducted ‘a study’ on all the mutations and their vaccine works against them all. Fine and dandy!    OOPS, but wait. It wasn’t an ‘actual study’, it was ‘preliminary research conducted on 20 people’ by the pharma company selling their vaccine.   No statistics on the 20 people.

Pfizer does warn people that anyone with a known allergic reaction to any of the vaccine properties or ingredients should not be given the vaccine. Here is a list of those ingredients:

Each dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine contains 30 mcg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.

It also includes the following ingredients: lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and 0.2 mg cholesterol), 0.01 mg potassium chloride, 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate, 0.36 mg sodium chloride, 0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and 6 mg sucrose. The diluent (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP) contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.

I’m sure everyone has an active understanding of all these ingredients and researched them …  right?   Well I happen to know ‘sucrose’ – is sugar. That’s about it. So let’s take a looksee:

  1. 4-hydroxybutyl azanediyl – is used in the manufacture of paint and printing ink as well as bricklaying and electrical work.   HAZARDS list acute toxicity 98%, harmful if inhaled, respiratory irritation, serious eye damage, organ toxicity single exposure, skin irritant, corrosive.
  2. 2-hexyldecanoate acid – used as a lubricant in brake fluids, engines and oil.   Classified as a skin irritant, corrosive, target organ toxicity, respiratory tract irritation.

These are the first two listed ingredients meaning they have the highest density in the vaccine. Hazardous chemicals that attack the respiratory tract and organs and have a toxicity ratio of 98%.

And suddenly Bill Gates statement, as he smiles, becomes even more Dr. Evil from some James Bond movie, “we’ll have to wait and see who survives…” laugh hysterically…