Colliding Cabals. Bankers vs Industrialists. Infighting.
Marco Rubio, has joined forces with two democrats, Rep Pascrell and Blumenauer to once again denounce Tesla and Musk for opening a showroom in the Xinjiang District of China. Xinjiang is the housing quarters for the ethnic Uyghurs. And thus the Biden Administration has declared a moratorium on buying cotton from this District. Others in the media have also opined their disgust with this move by Musk claiming he is in violation of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.
The law ‘Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act’, is aimed at preventing goods made with forced labor in the region from entering the U.S. market. Though goods made with forced labor were already banned in the United States, the act established an assumption that all goods made in Xinjiang were made with forced labor unless certified otherwise by Customs and Border Protection.
Obviously someone failed miserably in their homework. There are 53 Fortune 500 US businesses operating in Xinjiang, including: Amazon, Exxon, GE, Abbott Labs, Pepsi, Dell, Honeywell, HP, Cisco, Dow, Nike, Heinz, Boeing, Halliburton, etc… etc…
Not one of these other businesses have been called out except Tesla. WHY?
When the Vultures took over Twitter, Amazon, GE, Instagram, etc…, there were two high value companies that wouldn’t cave: Facebook & Tesla. Immediately a demonizing campaign was instituted to terrorize these CEO Founders into stepping away so that the Vultures could secure the company.
The source for most of these campaigns is of course – Soros. Essentially, in taking over these Fortune 500 companies they are nationalizing businesses in a Communist fashion. Centralizing the force of money into a smaller and smaller circle of control. Communists liken this process as a ‘redistribution of wealth’.
Pascrell Campaign Donations: Nearly all Unions.
Rubio Campaign Donations: Largest came from Votesane PAC which supports democrats and Rhinos.
Blumenauer Campaign Donations: Nearly all Union.
In the midst of these hypocritical politicians, their benefactor, Soros, has declared that Xi Jinping must go so as to install a ‘proper ruler’. Even more odd, is the fact that his speech regarding a regime change was made at the ‘conservative Hoover Group Institution’. His closing remark:
“This would remove the greatest threat that open societies face today and they should do everything within their power to encourage China to move in the desired direction.”
Although The Hoover Institute is described as conservative – it is more like a who’s who of warhawks and neoconservatives.
It becomes clear when reading the bio’s of The Hoover Institute Senior Fellows, they would be representative of One of the Cartel Cabalist vying for control. Advocating for a ‘free and open society’ within a ‘liberal international order’! NOT conservative – GLOBALIST.
They are the Banking/Economist/political clansmen who would seem to be in a quagmire with the number Two Cartel Cabalists – the Industrialists. Both attempting to secure their absolute hierarchy on the Global scene.
Media Fellows at the Hoover Institute include: Washington Times, National Review Online, Newsmax, and the Concord Monitor.
President Hoover was not exactly conservative. During his tenure he increased the tax rate to 63%, doubled estate taxes, and cut personal and corporate tax exemptions – all during the Great Depression. His legacy seems quite parallel to that of Jimmy Carter. He was a hugely disliked president – but had a humanitarian side that was noble.
For everything white there exists black. For everything light there is darkness. And for everything good – there is evil. As the Cabal expanded with marriages, so did a schism birth. The United we stand became a front of division. That division has been the crux of disunity among the Cabalists.
It is theorized that there are thirteen bloodlines that form the Cabal. Thirteen is derived from the Biblical reference of Christ as King being number 13 with 12 disciples. If there is a relationship it would mean that ONE bloodline is Head of the 12. And the notion that there is no ONE bloodline leading the rest would become a false premise.
Fully extrapolated, the ONE Bloodline would thus have to be Satan as the antithesis to Christ. Meaning there can only be twelve Cabalist Bloodlines – and Satan.
Many well advised have painstakingly listed the bloodlines – but what if they are wrong? For example, after the assassination of JFK, Jacqueline Kennedy flew into the protective arms of Onassis who is considered a Bloodline. The only reason she would have done this is if she was Bloodline through Jacqueline, Countess of Hainaut and Holland and House of Wittlesbach, a German dynasty.
The House of Windsor, the reigning royal house of the British monarchy, are descendants of Sophia of Hanover, a Wittelsbach Princess of the Palatinate by birth and Electress of Hanover by marriage, who had inherited the succession rights of the House of Stuart and passed them on to the House of Hanover. In following the lineage of Bouvier – she would be a descendant of this Bloodline that is now the House of Windsor. Onassis also a Bloodline would then make logical sense for Jacqueline to run to following the assassination of Kennedy.
The person who introduced the par was Charles Bartlett, an advisor to daddy Bush – also stained with the Bloodline. Was Jacqueline ‘installed’?
This would also explain why JFK’s and Jacqueline’s only surviving child, Caroline, became an Obama protégé. And that even Bloodlines are NOT sacred given the conspiratol death/murder of John Kennedy Jr.
Revealing – a distraction. TO have us follow persons who are NOT Bloodline at all….