TWITTER

TWITTER / X: The Dystopia of Censorship

Posted on by Helena

X-TWITTER:  Today I made the dastardly decision to write a post to the newly indoctrinated Agriculture Director regarding her approval of the Bird Flu Vaccine for ALL Cattle/beef.   I had barely lifted my finger from the keyboard when I got the dreaded message:  Your Account Is Temporarily Suspended For Hate Speech.  Obviously, it was algorithm wording I used – perhaps cyanide.   I’m not sure.  But oddly it felt dystopian – more so than when a Liberal doxes you which has happened recently as well.

I should be able to BLOCK Twitter censorship the same way I BLOCK idiot BOTS.  It is not unlike living under a surveillance dome wherein everything we do is monitored and analyzed in a nanosecond.  And I became increasingly – uncomfortable.   Certainly this happens to everyone at some point and after my first Sanction I was always very careful about my ‘speech’ –

I wonder if the fact that I was writing this to the Secretary of Agriculture is now considered preferential SUSPENSION.  After all – she was inserted by Trump.  

There are anti-suspension techniques.  On Facebook I learned years ago that if you routinely post comedic or animal mems, interspersed with your anti-vax or anti-Obama/Biden rants you were less likely to be reviewed.  So my Twitter suspension truly took me by surprise.  Especially given Musk’s adamant denunciation of the UK/Starmer for arresting people over ‘memes’.   Three to nine months in jail – UK.

I am convinced that if I ever again stepped foot in most European countries I would be arrested tout suite!  A sad reality to be sure.  And yet the Twitter pronouncement was two strikes you are permanently OUT!   Yet we each are witness to depraved content including threats of violence that is ‘allowed’.   So how do they get a pass?  Why wasn’t I simply ‘censored’?

What happens to the brain when we live in a regulated bubble of punishment?

MY particular message stated that if cattle are subjected to the Toxic Bird Flu Vax we may as well eat cyanide.  And the cattle and chicken industries would die as citizens refused to purchase the meat subjected to the secondary vaccine bioweapon.  Granted, my post was not made in lala land – but did it really qualify for suspension given it was advocated as an opinion?

Perhaps this is the super realization of a society in which AI makes emotional decisions on behalf of humans via input from fragmented humans.   Algorithms.  

I would suggest Musk has no idea the extent of these punishments.   Is this really our future – in the “free” world?   DO I want to live in a place and time where I must edit, modify, and re-edit my speech in fear of retaliation by a government that claims to be on MY SIDE?  Am I now on a LIST?   Deposited in in Twitter data compilation no different than Zelenskky’s Hit List of Any And All Peoples who do not support Ukraine?   Does Twitter maintain a HIT List?  In their algorithm?   In their AI?  

I have been an open advocate of both Trump and Musk.   But like the January 6ers, when the ones you support suddenly are the ones shape shifting to your punishers, loyalties quickly change.   The psychological phenomena is inherent in prisons wherein the guards treat everyone as sludge.   No matter your accusation.  Within days you learn that they are the enemy and the inmates are your support system.  An interesting shift.

Musk would do well to reserve some attention from DOGE to rogue Twitter accusations, suspensions, and bereft accusations against highly valuable opinions while promoting hate toward those Lesser On The Scale of Israeli Bow and Scrape Adulation.  LEST – the entire façade comes crumbling down ….  And there is nothing left but Mad Max.

FBI Exposed on Twitter – Internal Corruption Targeting The People

Posted on by Helena

The FBI’s excuse for why they were so deeply entrenched in Twitter is that they were collaborating as advisors only…   According to their Website, the Duties of an FBI Agent are as follows:  

Special agents bring their skills, compassion, and integrity to stay ahead of threats, uphold the law, defend civil rights, and protect innocent people. They seek out cybercrime, infiltrate organized crime rings, and investigate terrorists.

In order for that definition of duties to apply, the thought would follow that everyone the FBI flagged to be censored on Twitter was a ‘terrorist’.   Including, Donald Trump, among hundreds of thousands of others.   If the FBI were to state they were acting in any other capacity it would be akin to their admission of going “Rogue”.   Going rogue means they are now operating outside the parameters of their authority allowing everyone to ‘sue’ them.

So, they are quietly maintaining a vow of unholy silence!

…..Until a lawyer can twist some voodoo wands and conjure black magic. For now, mum is best so they can agree on a story and make sure everyone gets it right. Until that ripe moment, all press, Hollywood actors, all concert –media-hypers are told to keep their effing mouths shut or pay the price.

This ovation of material being downloaded by Twitter’s Musk merely tips the surface of corruption.   According to the FBI ‘spokesperson’, 80 agents were working inside Twitter.   How many are working inside Google? Gettr? Facebook? Gab? Parler? Instagram – etc…?

The FBI has roughly 7800 special agents working the field.   According to a Wired report issued in 2013, Google revealed that the FBI had issued 16,511 National Security Letters requiring Google to provide all pertinent information on a person without obtaining a warrant in one year – 2011. “ The National Security Letter provision of the Patriot Act radically expanded the FBI’s authority to demand personal customer records from Internet Service Providers, financial institutions and credit companies without prior court approval.”

The misuse of FBI authority was originally brought up in 2007 when the FBI was requiring AT&T and Verizon to station employees inside the FBI so that they could access accounts verbatim.   Using this same insider access the FBI were able to identify people who were walking around the Capitol and those inside.  Always without a warrant.

According to Charlie Hurt at the Washington Examiner, FBI agents were creating fake platforms that then opened backdoor portals to social media companies.   Their banning at Twitter included satire accounts they deemed interfered with their dissection of conservatives.

Lists of accounts were provided that the FBI recommended be turned off..   According to Director, Chris Wray, everything they did at Twitter was legal, above board and was done across all social media platforms.   Simultaneously, porn and pedophilia were NOT targeted…  ODD.

Suppressing information is NOT listed in the FBI manual of protocol and duties. Inserting propaganda – is not listed in the FBI manual.   However, ‘protecting civil rights’ is in the manual.   Civil rights such as right to privacy and freedom of speech.

It was the FBI that convinced the world that the CIA was not involved in the assassination of JFK and Oswald acted alone.   This line has been debunked as impossible given analysis of bullet trajectories.   But they needed the story to be killed. FBI agents were planted throughout the capitol grounds January 6th to incite riots. FBI agents ignored attorney access and raided Trump’s home.   They routinely tip off the press of coming raids for media hysteria.   And make a show of armour, AR’s and and intimidation when arresting conservative figures.

So who owns the FBI?   Likely, the same organization that owns everything – BIS.  All these organizations were created within a short span of each other in the early 1900’s.   BIS being the Banking Cartel took ownership of agencies which perform on behalf of BIS.

In 1975, Senator Frank Church gave a speech about the fact that the ‘intelligence community’; had perfected a means for listening to every conversation on airwaves. He warned that this insider ability meant that the government would know everything about everybody and use this power to create total tyranny.   The People would NEVER be able to fight back. Because any effort to combine together to resist the government would be known – no matter how privately it was done.

When saying this – logically, that would mean criminal activities could be known and deterred…   But they aren’t.   Does this mean the FBI actually allows crimes to happen?   Or worse, the FBI creates the crimes.

Edward Snowden.

After working for the CIA and subsequently NSA, Snowden revealed mass surveillance tactics used by government agencies internally and abroad.   At the time, Eric Holder was the Attorney General who charged Snowden in violation of the Espionage Act of 1917.    September 2020, a U.S. federal court ruled in United States vs Moalin  that the US intelligence’s mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal and possibly unconstitutional. Yet Snowden was never pardoned as a Whistleblower. WHY?

Wrong side.   Snowden was tasked with investigating the mass surveillance of the CCP – instead he found the US.   At the time, General Keith Alexander was running NSA.   He retired 3 months after the Snowden revelation.   Subsequently, Alexander created a cybersecurity agency providing services to private companies.

Like the world over, there are good cops and bad cops, good FBI agents and bad FBI agents. The FBI is rife with controversies for decades.

COINTELPRO was such a controversy: “tactics have been alleged to include discrediting targets through psychological warfare, smearing individuals and/or groups using forged documents and by planting false reports in the media, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and illegal violence, including assassination.” Their defense? They were maintaining the existing social and political Order.

Officially COINTELPRO was disbanded, unofficially it was never disbanded. And All The Kings Horses Scrubbed Humpty-Dumpty.