Hate Crime in US – statistics of blame

There is no better place to find fodder for a blog, than in a Blog or even the Liberal commentaries within a Blog.

When the Blog begins with the notion that ‘blame’ is wholly Hypocritical and a male thing, or a Republican thing, or a Christian thing, the uh-ohs begin. Because ultimately, the Blog will find a place to place – the Blame – without understanding that the hypocrisy has come full circle.

Commentaries are even more ridiculous. When a commentator has nothing to defend their point, they immediately revert to defamation of character. And they don’t beat around the bush – they go for the gut and glory.

One such Blame I have found is that Trump is the cause of the ‘spike in hate crimes’. Actually, hate crimes against Muslims began a steady rise in 2012, during the Obama Presidency.   It is also worth discussing who is committing the hate crimes, against whom, and why is it that hate that is targeted against white people is NOT counted as a hate crime?  At least not by the Liberals.

No one would say they support hate crime, but it is important to maintain a level head regarding statistics: The number of incidences in 2013, as reported by the FBI, was 5,928. Out of a total US population of 330 million, that would represent .0018% of the population. Of those hate crimes, 3407 were racially motivated 67% per perpetrated against blacks, but 52% of those were white offenders. So now we can extrapolate that .0003% of the white population is responsible for some sort of a hate crime.

‘Hate Crime” is defined within multiple categories:  assault, rape, intimidation, property theft/damage, and murder. Of the total number of ‘hate crimes’ that resulted in murder, the percentage is .1% – or five people. Again no one is condoning crimes, it is just about showing the statistical divergences and disproportionate attention.

Despite these extremely low statistics, somehow, Hate Crime represents Trump and all other white people in the US…

According to the same FBI, in 2013 the number of blacks killed by whites stood at .77 per 1 million. By contrast, the number of whites killed by blacks was 9.83 per 1 million. Ten times more.   In 2007, there were 14,000 assaults on white women by black men.  Versus ALL total hate crimes = 5,928.

The problem with statistics, is they actually reveal truth.

The number of hate crimes committed by whites ‘pales’ in comparison to the total crimes committed against whites by blacks. But diverting this focus to an agenda of ‘hate crime’ serves two purposes: Division. Hate.

It extends a justification for blacks to commit more crime. It subjugates whites. And it sets up a nation for an even greater agenda – civil war. Unfounded in statistics, but energized by shadows who see the fall of the US as an end game.

The writer of this fodder article takes it a few steps further blaming Trump for the ‘cold blooded murder of Muslims, ICE agents rounding up Latinos, and threatening Jews with the oven! WOW! None of this occurred until Trump was President… WOW!

According to the FBI, the number of religious motivated hate crimes involved 1223 victims. Of those, 61% were Jewish, 13.7% were Muslim, 6.1% were Catholic, and 3.8 were Protestant. That means that a total of 167 Muslims were the target of hate crimes… compared to 746 Jews. What we don’t know is who were the perpetrators in these cases.   Were Muslims targeting Jews?

Lastly, this woman alleges that what we have today is “Trump’s America” and a Revolution is a means to vengeance.

The statistics I cited were Obama’s America. The causes have been inflated way out of proportion.   But the anger has most definitely been incited, the bitterness is overwhelming, and the desire to destroy profound. All in the name of Peace.   I see it so often cited by people who define themselves as pacifists, lovers, embedded in tolerance, embracing, kind, and yet – somehow they can’t see the mirror, the reflection that they promote is far different. Death threats are justified. Assault is justified. Because it comes in ‘their name of peace’.

Unfortunately, many, if not most of these outlets promoting victimhood, are also promoting Dissent and Revolution. Which fuels conservatives to ‘buy more guns’ out of fear of these peace loving revolutionaries who just want us all – dead.

IRAN Nuclear Deal – A Sham

Was the Iran Nuclear Deal more about finding a means for lifting sanctions than curbing their nuclear production? Was it more of a corporate decision in order to profit on the economy of Iran while unfreezing potentially $100 billion in assets, which could be used to pay for the greed of corporate products? Maybe it was to legalize all the ‘waivers’ that had been extended despite the sanctions!

The US had already apparently granted some 296 waivers, allowing various business to operate, trade, and service in Iran – prior to the Iran Nuclear Deal. All granted during the Obama regime.

Waivers were given to a host of biomedical, agriculture, and medical device companies, but they were also given to institutions like Harvard, New York University, HSBC, BNP Paribas, GE, genetics companies, etc…

BNP was cited for illegally doing business with Iran, Sudan and Cuba despite sanctions in place. They were fined nearly $9 billion by the US, and then issued a waiver – to do business in Iran. BNP is also the largest nuclear investor bank in the world with $13.5 billion on the line.

Since the Iran Nuclear Deal became effective, the share price of BNP Paribas has risen 67%.

So what is the point of sanctions if waivers are the norm?

And who is denied a waiver? How much does it cost to buy a waiver? Where is the waiver money deposited, because I don’t see it as a line item under the Federal Revenue Budget?

Nothing is ever as it seems, and the Iran Deal is no exception.

Playing with the sanctions in Iran has been rather self fulfilling as periodically specific sanctions were lifted. In 2000, sanctions were lifted on ‘caviar and carpets’, obviously to accommodate the appetite of the uber wealthy.

With a failed attempt to colonize Ukraine, was Iran the next largest prospect? Cuba?

Iran is much more westernized than other Middle Eastern countries. The Burqua is not required.   Luxury brands from the EU and US are popular. They have copycat markets for burgers, pizza, and even Starbucks. Victoria Secrets, cigarettes, Dell and Apple products are everywhere.

Legalizing what has already been done under the table is only a part of the agenda.

Israel. Israel and Iran despise each other. Lifting the sanctions releases a pressure valve ramping up Israel’s defensive character. The Iran Deal also sends a message to Israel that – you aren’t important, business is – and isolates Israel from virtually the rest of the world given the P5+1 signed off on the New Deal. P5+1 is Russia, China, UK, US, and France, the +1 is Germany, an after thought… why not make it the P6? Too easy.

The notion that scrapping the Iran deal will somehow spur Iran to greater nuclear capacity is rather naïve. Iran has yet to be transparent, we really don’t know – or aren’t saying – their true nuclear capabilities. Despite the IAEA politely asking for pretty please permission to see all of Iran’s facilities, the request is not always granted. This same IAEA organization claims they will conduct ‘oversight’ to maintain that Iran stays within the confines of the Iran Nuclear Deal… But of course, how can they possibly when they don’t even know where all the sites exist and aren’t allowed access?

Allegations about facilities have abounded, and sometimes shelved. When denied access, the IAEA simply shrugs. With a budget of roughly ½ billion euros, what exactly do they do and where does their money come from?   Apparently the revenue is generated via ‘contributions from member states – perhaps why Germany was made a quasi member, to ante up. And the bulk of expenses are for staff, travel and consultants.

According to staff at the IAEA, their inspectors don’t have the expertise or knowledge to properly inspect and identify whether a machine is being utilized for military capabilities or not! Hence they require outside consultants. So why have the IAEA if outside consultants can perform the job at 1/20th of the cost?

The IAEA doesn’t have a clean bill of health in their performance having been called out for improper samplings and techniques in Syria. Even Democrat Feinstein has stated that the IAEA needs to be substantially overhauled if we are going to rely on their oversight.

Littered with oddities from the beginning, the Iran Nuclear Deal really had little to do with curtailing Iran’s nuclear capabilities and more to do with opening a floodgate for Corporate wealth – and putting Israel on notice.

Bannon’s War! Southern Poverty Law Center

Bannon left the White House precisely because he would be free of the liberal media scrutiny and free to do and say what he wanted to do and say while in the White House – but couldn’t. His hands were tied. No more.

He has created an agenda; The Swamp Cleaner.

There was an old movie in which Harvey Keitel played The Cleaner. His job was to come in when a hit had gotten messy and clean up the mess. Frequently that meant additional hits as well as literally wiping clean all evidence. Bannon was a target from the getgo from the Liberals, and the liberal media. The New York Times vehemently hated him and badgered him relentlessly. Because he was a spokesperson for Trump the targeted badgering reflected on Trump negatively.  Exit stage left, Enter stage right.

Now, outside of the confines and constricts of the White House, he is free to do what he wants which entails cleaning the Swamp of both GOP fuddy-duddies and Liberal weeds.

While the New York Times has bashed Breitbart News, aka Bannon, citing The Sourthern Poverty Law Center (which is a front for yet another George Soros web) which refers to Breitbart as “a white ethno-nationalist propaganda mill.” Because apparently, today, if one is white, one is a racist and supremacist.  But wait!

It is interesting to note that the Board of Directors at the Southern Poverty Law Center is comprised of; 1 black man, 2 women, and 10 white supremacists! Aw Shucks! And in teaching “Tolerance” and love, they have devised a “Hate Map” on which they pinpoint what they refer to as Hate Groups around the US whose activities include; criminal acts, marches, rallies, meetings, leafleting, publishing and speeches. Well, that’s hateful.

They have identified 663 antigovernment hate groups in the US who they define as opposed to The New World Order. Christians are considered a ‘hate group’, are thus not tolerated and must be extinguished…   In total they list over 900 Hate Groups. If it wasn’t crazy, it might be a funny spoof movie with Leslie Neilson.

Their teaching tools, which they distribute to schools ‘for free’, perpetuate a communist view. No surprise. Everyone must be the same. No one can be different. No societal class, no wealth, no poverty, no color, no religion, just absolute homogeny. Ommmm.  I think it’s called Communism.

A 501©(3) charity with a budget approaching $80 million, they somehow manage to operate at a net loss. According to their 2014 990, their 10 officers rake in about $2.3 million, another $17+ million is paid for employees, benefits and payroll taxes, occupancy/rent is $1.4 million (nice digs), and the publications that they give away for ‘free’ cost them over $14 million. They bought their building and equipment for about $35 million. They are sitting on roughly $6 million in cash and cash equivalents, and over $330 million in investment securities!!

That’s a LOT of Moula!

I guess hate maps make a lot of money. But they also make money by ‘seizing the assets’ of ‘hate groups’ they cripple? Really?

So how is it that a non-profit can have so much cash and investment income? Doesn’t that make them a profit? Because right now, it’s all – TAX FREE.

The company also passively notes that they have ownership interest in several ‘foreign corporations’ which they are not required to list, and they are indirect owners in several passive foreign investment companies… While the names have not been disclosed, their locations bear witness; Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and Bermuda – all tax havens. Golly.

In addition, their principle campaign organization, Grassroots Campaign, which generated a net fundraising loss for them of over $1.2 million, is apparently affiliated with the Democrat National Committee and Moveon.Org. Other prominent clients include; Planned Parenthood, Doctors Without Borders, Amnesty International, and ACORN. That didn’t go well…

The organization is routinely quoted by the media to prove a point, to certify that a company or person is a hater, or to defame those who do not support the agenda of a New World Order.

All the while they quote the meme, “Don’t fight hate, with hate.” Which of course, is exactly what they are doing…

Weinstein – Sexual Predators

It’s interesting that these women who have stepped out of the closet after 30+ years are labeled heroes for finally exposing Weinstein’s sexual predatory actions. It is equally interesting who is claiming to have ‘no knowledge’ of any of his purported indiscretions. Hollywood is a community, like Peyton Place, where everyone knows everything about everybody. The fact that this ‘community’ aided and abetted, enabled and supported the illegal activity of Weinstein is rather significant.

It is reported that his contract had a clause regarding sexual harassment, apparently numerous women were paid off over the course of decades. The Hollywood couch has long been a part of the package. And it didn’t extend to just attractive women, but men and boys as well.   This is – their community.

Not only did these ten women aid Weinstein’s perversity, but his company and Directors as well – Robert Weinstein, Lance Maerov, Richard Koenigsberg and Tarak Ben Ammar.   They turned a blind eye, cut the checks, and shrugged it off. To make the claim that they are ‘utterly shocked by the allegations’, is quite sad. Why is this different than sex trafficking?

Sex trafficking: when someone uses coercion to cause a commercial sex act. A commercial sex act is when a person receives something in exchange – like an Oscar, a role in a movie…

When looking at various historical sexual predatory scandals, Hollywood would seem to be at the forefront of many accusations; Franklin Scandal, UN Scandal, British Scandals – Jimmy Savile, a scandal that has sat on the books now for nearly 40 years… Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein?

The story is sensationalized, money is exchanged, private discussions, the story is quashed, time passes, everyone forgets, the victims become the bad guy, and history is rewritten.   Over and over again.

In the ‘real world’, aiding and abetting a criminal – is a crime. But Hollywood has set themselves above the law – above education – and above morality. They represent tyranny. They rewrite our history to conform to an agenda, an ideology that suits their perverse humor. Their power has superseded city, state and federal government.

Our acceptance has become so lax that the sex/porn/enslavement industry has surpassed the drug trade. On the low side, it is estimated that the industry nets $150 billion tax free per year. There is no real way to know the finances given it isn’t a measured business reporting profits to the IRS…

I’ve listened to friends who justify their porn as not hurting anyone, just a natural part of human sexuality.   But of course, it is hugely false, it is a rationale that has even been supported by therapists. How small – is what created how big.

The problem that has evolved is how do you squash an industry that makes ten times more Net Income than the largest company in the world – Walmart? Pornography was legalized in the US under the statute of ‘free speech’ and consensual adults. But apparently, that wasn’t good enough, the simple porn became blasé, and the demand for illegal pedophile and forced slavery became the appetite.

And the industry flourished. Sting operations continue, a few gang members and pimps go to jail, but the real CEO’s remain untouched. Weinstein has flown the coup taking a private jet to an unknown destination under the pretext of registering into a clinic for sex addiction.   Given charges could be filed, it would seem he has become simply another cog in the mechanization of the industry. The story will die and history rewritten.

2nd Amendment: Mass Shootings, White Supremacy and Deception

The British and Australians would seem to believe that their way is the right way, and the way of the US is the wrong way when it comes to many issues, the most prevalent and recent being – Gun Control.

Every murderous event repays the exact same sentiment, ignores the same statistics, and blames Republicans and Conservatives. Cuba. They have the same murder rate as the US – and NO personal guns. Venezuela. They have the second highest murder rate in the world. Brazil. Columbia, El Salvador. Honduras. Africa.

What are the common denominators, because what these poor, impoverished people don’t have is – guns?     Corruption. Drugs. Gangs. Poverty.

Piers Morgan, a Brit, has had numerous debates with various proponents that advocate the upholding of the US 2nd Amendment. And while the laws within the 2nd Amendment have been tweeked and retweeked, each time there is a catastrophic event, Piers Morgan is in the limelight once again making his proclamations and demonstrative arguments for which he repeatedly fails to actually elicit statistical proof. Instead, he seems to serve more as a victim of debate failure.

The 2nd Amendment was created because in 1689 a British King, James II, attempted to establish a Monarchial edict whereby Catholics could own weapons, and Protestants could not. Codified in the English Bill of Rights, Parliament saw the ‘evil and subversion’ in this far reaching authority of the Crown and quashed it. The US was created to escape British rule – including the ability to make proclamations such as gun ownership.

The 2nd Amendment was created so that the over-reaching power of the government could not take away an inalienable right to bear arms whether to fight tyranny, organize a militia, or to protect their family and property.   The US would NOT bow to English Monarchial attempts to subvert The People, all the people.

The argument against armed citizenry was the notion that the government army would not be powerful enough to squash a militia should a government military takeover be instituted. And this control over the people was paramount.   Noah Webster was against citizen armament and stated, “Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

In other words, if the federal government, on any pretense, wanted to declare Martial Law, if citizens were armed, Martial Law would not prevail.

Piers Morgan believes that if multiple round guns are eliminated, there will be no more mass shootings… which of course is extremely short-sighted and simplistic. If we truly want to find a solution, then looking at those countries whose statistics and demographics might help us gain insight is much more productive.

Australia argues that it isn’t an immigration issue because they have an immigrant population of 28% and a significantly low murder rate.   But they’ve always had a low murder rate, even before they instituted gun control measures. What they don’t mention is the fact that ‘MOST” immigration visa’s are ‘Skilled Occupation” which was instituted in 1996, the same year they instituted reformed gun control. As a result, they prime select who is allowed to immigrate, the rest are deported or put in a 4 year detention facility on a remote island!   That, my friend, is Cherry Picking!  Of the approximate 4.75million immigrants that are accounted by country of origin, 1.3million come from countries that might be considered ‘border-line’.   The rest come from the UK, Germany, France, US, New Zealand, China, Italy, etc… to either work in a pre-approved field, or to go to university. Still, a disproportionate amount of welfare monies are spent on immigrants.  Tch.  Tch.

Simply stating one part of the whole of the data has little value.

Of the Mass Shootings in the US during Obama’s tenure there are interesting demographics outside of the blame the GUNS rhetoric, and the racial identity is even more News Worthy:

1)   Fort Hood Massacre – 2009:   US Army Major and psychiatrist – Muslim, radicalized by al Qaeda; prior to shooting described as Schizoid, belligerent, Paranoid and disconnected.   Used 1 semi-automatic handgun with high capacity.

2)   Aurora Movie Theater Shooting – 2012: Growing up upper middle class, pursuing his PhD, his desire to kill was a ten year dream. He was seeing a psychiatrist and the school authorities were alerted to his potential threat weeks before.

3)   Newton School Shooting – 2012: Lanza grew up in a wealthy household, was diagnosed with Aspergers and was called ‘deeply troubled’. Used guns from his mother’s collection.

4)   San Bernardino Mass Shooting – 2015: Two American Muslims radicalized in Saudi Arabia to ISIS, they used two rifles

5)   Orlando Nightclub Massacre – 2016:  Muslim terrorist swore allegiance to ISIS and targeted the LGBT community. Used a semi-automatic rifle and a glock.

6)   Burlington, Washington – 2016; Arcan Cetin, an Hispanic male opened fire in a shopping mall killing five using a semi-automatic rifle.

7)  Rosenburg, Oregon – 2015: Harper-Mercer shot and killed 8 students and a teacher. He purchased his 14 weapons from southern California. He was discharged from the Army with mental issues, and diagnosed as having mental issues from a young age going to a special needs school. He described himself as being “mixed race”.

8) Chattanooga, Tennessee – 2015: Mohammod Youssuf Abdulazeez (safe to say he was Muslim) opened fire on a military center killing 5 and injuring 3.

9)   Charleston, SC – 2015: Dylann Roof, a white supremacist killed 9 black people at a Episcopal church.

10)   Isla Vista, CA – 2014: Born in the UK and of British and Malaysian race, diagnosed within the Autism spectre, and prescribed anti-psychotics for schizophrenia, he used his BMW, knives, and handguns, executing 6 and injuring 7.

11) Washington Navy Yard – 2013: Aaron Alexis, a Navy contractor and a black man, killed 13 and injured 3 using a shotgun and a pistol.

Out of eleven incidents – we have five Muslims, one black, two mixed race, one Hispanic, two whites previously diagnosed with mental illness, and one white supremacist.

And in fact, 23 ‘described’ mass shootings occurred under the Nobel Peace Prize winning – Obama.

Not exactly the all white male supremacists that the media is touting, or an angry white male professor is touting, or the Hollywooders at large – are touting!! Sometimes a bit of research unravels a lot of deception.

Celluloid Heroes…

There is an old song by The Kinks titled, Celluloid Heroes. It was a favorite of a boyfriend, and I remember seeing the live decades ago. I think it is appropriate because it identifies the role of ‘movie stars’ or ‘entertainers’. They are a prop, a character, a stage persona, that we identify with based on the role they play. Their true beliefs and personality are supposed to be locked inside themselves, given that is not their purpose. Therein, we can create – heroes.

The initial goal was to create heroes that were flawed, men and women who came to see their err in life and rose above as their lesson was learned. Jimmy Stewart played a host of such rolls, always with a failing, always with a message, always with a learning.

Today, actors seem to have abandoned this shadow appearance and taken on roles that are politically, socially, and morally obscene. And as such, don’t realize that this taints their screen appearance. It seems more a fraud than a role. It makes them … smaller.

In particular, I am watching a Christian themed Christmas movie in which Ed Asner stars as a devout – Christian father. In reality, Asner has been vocally demonstrative, demeaning, and vacuous in his hatred and divisive nature. And so, I no longer see an actor, I see a hypocrite.  I wanted, a celluloid hero.

I don’t think Hollywood quite understands how vast is their destructive mouth and tongue, how uneducated is their stance, or how stale is their breath. And I try and recall Christ’s words, “They know not what they do…” As he asks for forgiveness of their vast sins.

Most recently I was shown a Facebook post in which Gaga sat and for a lengthy term had an analogue with herself about how we must all stop being so divisive, so antagonistic, so filled with contempt and foul negativity toward others who don’t share beliefs. And yet, a quick Google search revealed her revile, her hatred, her animosity, her repugnance… her very vocal negativity toward anyone who did not hold her beliefs, of anything and all that was not in align with – her.

Of course, what this revealed is the fact that Hollywood hypocrisy is somehow ignored, or forgotten, or justified…

Another case in point: I recently wrote a response to a ‘Christian Blogger’ in Australia, Mike Frost, whose site stated that he embraced 1) open conversation 2) grace vs nature, and 3) positivity vs negativity. The blog I was responding to was about how American Christians are hypocrites when it comes to the Bible and gun control… Errr, not positive, not filled with grace, and as I found – not open – unless it was to laud and praise the ‘author’.  OUCH!

  1. Not positive. But, I still – believed. And so I presented facts and statistics. I was completely blind-sided when his response to my statistics and facts from the US perspective didn’t align with his and as a result he chose to attack my character – like a Hollywooder. Instead of the ‘open conversation’ and ‘grace’ he spoke about, his true value was about self and attack.

But even worse, he revealed that he most likely – was not a Christian at all. It was a mask.

He was no different than a ‘celluloid hero’ pretending to be something – that was far afield of ‘truth’.   What was revealed was that there are wolves who will use the Christian platform to attempt to woo people into a false reality. He was not about ‘open conversation’, ‘ or ‘grace’, or ‘positivity’, he was about bashing Christian American’s as ‘hypocrites’ and shaming me as incompetent. Neither of which support his ‘belief system’.

It is quite sad.

I knew the name Jimmy Kimmel. But I knew nothing of the person. His fame was simply a by-product, like Kathy Griffin, he has made a name for himself based on his animosity and hatred. But otherwise, I had no idea, who he was as a person. No college degree (an honorary – doesn’t count, sorry), a shitake mushroom load of self lauding, self grandizing, self glorifying that makes me cringe, grit my teeth, and stiffen into contortious contempt. As in “ARGHGHGHHGHHGHGHG” are you kidding me! His bio is ‘not’ one that I would embrace.

But that is the evolution of “Hollywood”, the celluloid heroes who once were, but are no more… instead they are simply grandiose narcissists who have no boundaries, ethics or morality.   And as such – The World Turns.

Reuters – A Soros Cabalite

A Reuter’s article is claiming that Russia is aiding and abetting North Korea in order to protect themselves militarily from the NATO and US forces buildup on Russia’s border. There is absolutely no mention of Russia diffusing the North Korea crisis which would implode into a massively destructive World War. Interesting diversion…

Reuters is also asserting that the Catalonia referendum is a Russian plot to destabilize the EU and that the majority of Spaniards don’t want the split. Their citation notes the fact that “Catalonian independence advocates are among those who’ve flown to Moscow to meet with a group that, as of 2016, received Kremlin funding to help network Western separatist groups.”  That group is The Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia.

This group consists of one member and has operated on a grant of $54,000 since its inception. If I could post a smiley wink face, I would, because the citation is hardly a gasp, it is more of a ‘giggle’.

They further claim, in the same article, that WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and Russia collaborated to undermine Hillary’s election… and that the US intelligence community has so stated.  It is as though Russia is the common denominator for everything – according to Reuters.

So what is up with Reuters?   This is drivel.

Stephen Adler is the CEO of Reuters, and also happens to be the chairman for Columbia Journalism Review, which is funded by the George Soros Open Society Foundation! Dang.

Reuters has been conscripted into the Soros cabal. As such the Reuter advancement against anything remotely favoring sovereignty becomes clear. It would also explain the penchant for demonizing Russia. In addition, in 2016 Kyle Pope became the new Editor of the Columbia Journalism Review. He has been quite vocal and taken on a leadership role in his efforts to chastise and bring legal response against Trump for his reactions and statements regarding the less than truthful media.

Adler also serves on the boards of; The World Economic Forum, Council on Foreign Relations, and the Committee to Protect Journalists.

He is married to Lisa Grunwald, whose sister, Maddy, is apparently one of Hillary’s closest advisors. She has been a devoted Clintonite since 1992 when she helped Billy as Director of Advertising for his presidential run. She was also instrumental in the election victories of Elizabeth Warren, John Lynch, Tammy Baldwin and Ken Salazar in Colorado.

Reuters has a few skeletons in its closet including promoting climate change bias, doctoring photographs, and refusing to label terrorists ‘terrorists’ given that “one person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter”.

Unfortunately, we can now observe that one more media outlet has been cabaled, and as such, is incapable of reporting and only capable of propagandizing on behalf of the Soros/Rothschild agenda.

Sigh.

Gun Control in Australia: A Hype of Statistics

Australia’s Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, has offered to help the US mitigate our gun problem. According to her, we must have the government simply buy up every gun in the country and physically destroy them, just like they did.

A Liberal, Bishop was an attorney in Australia before suddenly flying to the US in 1996 and spending eight weeks at Harvard whereupon she was ‘encouraged’ to go into politics. Apparently, she was ‘rather good’ given that within two years she defeated an incumbent of 17 years for the federal position of Australian Parliament for Curtin.

In 2015, Bishop actively campaigned for the Clinton Foundation, she worked side by side with Billy in committing Australia and the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) to work together to transform access to health in developing countries over the next five years.

In fact, between 2008 and 2014, through the tireless work of Bishop… Australia contributed $88 million to the Clinton Foundation. By default, we can assume a Soros connection.

In 1996, Australia initiated new gun laws which called for confiscation and registration. In 1997 there were 2.5 million privately owned guns. In 2016, there were 3.15 million privately owned guns. In 1997, there were 2.5 million registered guns in Australia, indicating that before the law was activated, all privately owned guns were already registered. In 2016, 2.89million guns were registered, indicating that with the enactment of the law, 26 thousand guns are now unaccounted.

Statistics are important as a measure based on ‘per capita’, not on simple numbers. As such, crime in Australia for burglaries, rape, assaults, drug use, and violence are significantly higher than in the US.

Citing the significant drop in the homicide rate in Australia as evidence that gun confiscation works, is a bit misleading given that the numbers had already begun a sharp decline beginning in 1989, nearly 10 years earlier.

So if Australia confiscated and destroyed 650,000 guns in its massive gun control program, how is it that there are more guns privately owned today, and more unregistered guns today and still a lower murder rate?  The numbers don’t work…

There are two possible explanations:

1)   In Queensland, South Australia and The Northern Territory life imprisonment is a mandatory sentence for murder. The possibility of parole and recidivism doesn’t exist.

2)   Over the last decade the prison rate in Australia has increased by roughly 58%.  More murderers in jail, no parole, no recidivism, lower murder rates.

Another comparison is worthy of Note:

  • In 1987, the murder rate in Australia was 2. In 2009, the rate was 1.3. The decrease that the government would have us believe was attributable to gun confiscation and regulation, was 35%.
  • In 1987, the murder rate in the US was 8.3. In 2009, the rate was 5.   A 40% decrease that the government would have us believe is attributable to…?  Oops!

Statistics can be useful – when the user isn’t promoting an agenda. The US experienced a greater decrease in murder rates over the same time period as Australia, while imposing NO gun control or confiscations.

Here’s another fun fact:

According to the quite Liberal Washington Post, the average gun owner in the US owns 8 guns! Over 20% of gun owners own more than 10. If the US rate is 6 times that of Australia, that would mean that more household individuals own guns in Australia than the US!

These statistics mimick the vaccine propaganda which utilizes a chart to show when a vaccine was first administered and the decline in the rate of the disease. What they don’t show is the fact that 99% of the time, the rate of the disease had already been dropping precipitously well before the administration of the vaccine and there is now no way to know if it had simply reached its natural course and would have eliminated itself.

The obvious intent on creating gun control and possibly confiscation in the US is the ability to initiate Martial Law, which is what most gun owners fear. Rightfully.  Using each propaganda event as catastrophic proof that gun control is a necessary solution, is a liberal agenda that has absolutely no verifiable statistic – including Australia.

Las Vegas Shooter: Mind Control?

Remote Control of Human Brains. Over ten years ago a team at Stanford University announced that they had perfected the art of brain control in mice through optogenetics whereby the firing of a pattern of neurons is controlled by light. Over the years, the research evolved, becoming more finely tuned and perfected.  Today, that behavioral control is harnessed via magnetic waves. Controlling not just the movements, but the behavior of a person as well.  Scientists have publically claimed they can utilize this technique on rats, mice, pidgeons, beetles, cockroaches and the sharkfish.

What they haven’t announced is whether they have been conducting research on humans. It’s a fair guess, they have.

Elon Musk has stated that this advancement has the potential to create a new race of humans who are not controlled and deviated by emotions.  However, if in fact emotions can be harnessed and manipulated to sway aggressive behavior, then they can also be swayed to perform aggressively.   As in assassinations and terrorism.

Of course, utilizing remote mind control for good, is only so ‘good’ as the person at the controls. The power to manipulate human behavior will elevate that controller to feeling like God, which can never have positive consequences.  And while robotics and artificial intelligence have been the science mania of late, remote manipulation and control of a human whether through hypnosis or through implants, the potential for this to be utilized for harm is quite real.

Given the military has a tendency to only divulge information that it deems necessary, it is a fair estimate to venture that human trials have occurred.

January 2017, Esteban Santiago shot 13 people, killing 5 at the Fort Lauderdale airport. He claimed his mind was being controlled by the CIA forcing him to join ISIS. Today we are witness to the carnage in Las Vegas in which an otherwise ‘ordinary guy’ according to his brother, with an arsenal befitting a commando unit, opened fire on concert goers killing 58 and wounding over 500.   According to Reuters, the gunman, a benign apartment manager with no previous record, converted to Islam and conducted the massacre.

While the background on this incident is still be investigated and the only evidence of his connection to ISIS is based on their website, Amaq, it bears a striking resemblance to the Santiago case.

There have been a number of other shooters making this claim, and while the possibility exists that they are using conspiracy models to justify their behavior, the history of mind manipulation within the military dates back to the 1950’s. The notion that they would simply give it up when a human assassin can be manufactured from any person is about as logical as the notion that the military simply ‘gave up’ on weather modification shutting down the Alaska facility.

We would be quite naive to believe this is ordinary.

The problem is disseminating between the psychological unfit, and the possible realities.   The unfit tend to make the realities less believable.

As in many scientific breakthroughs, there are potential positive uses for controlling brain functions. Such applications include utilizing TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation, to increase activity in the brain so as to reduce depression. Or even reduce activity so as to diminish the symptoms of Parkinson’s.  These beneficial utilizations give credence to very ugly ethical and moral complexities.

In 2013, students at the University of Washington used focused ultrasound, FUS, to trigger motor cortex responses. Today, the FUS is used to treat various cancer tumors as well as essential tremor. And at Brown University, they created the first wireless implanted brain-computer interface.

Whether or not brain control is and has been manipulated to create terrorism is a valid consideration given that knowledge leads to power and absolute power corrupts.  Is DIA really the equivalent of the alleged Berkshire UK facility as stated by James Casbolt?  Does this evil cabal exist?  Conspiracies have become the fodder of hackers, but when Operation Mockingbird was first revealed, it was previously a – conspiracy.   

Puerto Rico: A Mess of Entitlement!

Puerto Rico’s mayor, Carmin Yulin Cruz, and Broadway mega-millionairre, Lin-Manuel Miranda, are apparently blaming Trump for not having the completely destroyed Puerto Rico up and running ‘faster’, despite the 10,000 Federal aid workers on the ground! Miranda has gone so far as to tell Trump he is going to hell, which is odd given he appears to be an atheist.

Given that he has not donated his personal funds to the relief effort in Puerto Rico seems to be the caveat of hypocrisy. He did compose a song… at 3am, which he states will someday produce funds that will in some manner benefit his native Puerto Rico… Although it remains unclear how or when.

A friend of Obama, a devout Democrat, a young man who made his fortune in the US, he feels entitled to slay the dragon of Trumpest.

Cruz’s background is a bit sketchier. She came to the states to get her bachelors and masters degrees, (paid for by whom?), worked at Scotiabank in Canada (rather odd), in the US Treasury Department at some point (with the Clintons?), and then suddenly decided to go back to Puerto Rico and be a political beast at the age of 29. But her career didn’t launch for 20 years?  What she did in the meantime is a rather dramatic hole of information.

Of note, Puerto Rico’s mess is not just hurricane related, but financial corruption and mismanagement also follow its value structure. After decades of paying debt with debt, the government destroyed the economy. Standing at over $123 billion including pensions, they are on par with Illinois whose debt and crime statistics rank in the top tier for the US.

What is interesting is the fact that two Democrat US President’s were responsible for the implosion of Puerto Rico’s debtor economy; Clinton and Obama. Clinton phased out subsidies and in 2014 Obama’s administration called for a severe downgrade in their bonds which triggered acceleration clauses that led to protests, recession, unrest and poverty. In addition, it should not go unmentioned that Puerto Rico is not a US State with all its benefits, it is a commonwealth, per the voting citizens of their own desire, operating under their own Constitution. Just because they now want statehood, doesn’t mean it is automatically granted – and given their debt load, it is not logical.

But Trump – is to blame for their 40 years of corruption and mismanagement.

Internally, the media has stated that the ‘local governments’ are to blame for the collapse of the economy due to ineptitude, failure to collect taxes, mismanagement of payrolls, something like – Greece!

Over 60% of the population is on Medicare or Medicaid as of 2017, the annual budget deficit was still $7.5 billion, until recently the retirement age for teachers was 47, and their debt – well, unpayable – ever, they have no source of income left and as an independent commonwealth, who is responsible to pay to rebuild?

Given they are already indebted to the tune of $123 billion, I doubt the US can support a complete overhaul. Hence, I imagine we’ll see large corporations and hedge funds move in to take control and create their own private enclave, and completely sever any US affiliation.

The newly elected governor decided to hire Rothschild and Co to help restructure their debt…  As in Soros?

How are these policies helping the people?

Their economy by and large thrives on pharma manufacturing and petrochemicals. Operating under the auspices of a Progressive Democrat government, Puerto Rico operates somewhat like a true Socialist country in that corporations are nationalized and operated by the government. Over 30% of its budget funds these government owned corporations, while 25% of the budget funds their government, and 30% is allocated to ‘General Expenses’.

Venezuela is closely aligned with Puerto Rico in its Socialism. Due to lack of diversification, planning, and mitigating, their economies have crumbled under the guise of the socialist/communist ideology and left the people with massive shortages of basic necessities such as food and water.

These deficiencies – are being blamed on – Trump by uneducated, bitter, angry, liberals promoting an agenda that only serves to extend their own crisis as they are plummeted into the vacuum of chaos.

And yet, while Mayor Cruz is ‘begging, begging, begging anyone to help them from dying’, and claiming, ‘you are killing us with your inefficiency’, Miranda is condemning Trump to hell while he writes – a song, and Cruz is standing in front of banks of pallets screaming, “Not enough”!