ANTIFA Terrorism: A Nazi Lesson

David Hogg, the Broward County liberal anti-gun toting wannabe reporter has risen into the fray of Antifa like action promoting violent protests and assault.   February 2018, he formed the group Never Again MSD whereby their policies have ramped up to thug tactics of threats and assaults against government officials, including ICE.

Initial funding came from George and Amal Clooney, Oprah Winfrey, Jeffrey Katzenberg and Steven Spielberg who all donated $500,000.   Not a bad first year – $2 million!   Since then a number of colleges have come onboard including; Harvard, Columbia, Yale, MIT and University of Florida.

Rooted in uprising, the target market is – youth.   These are the propaganda machinizations that create the mass murderers that we have witnessed of late. Their agenda is hatred.   Their core is assault.   And their discipline is socialism/communism with a cup full of totalitarianism.   It is the Hitler Youth Movement.

While they claim their agenda is to ‘tackle gun legislation’, they have made no proposals, taken no legislative action, and have instead moved into – immigration, aka ICE.

While the Never Again Movement claims their actions resulted in the passage of new gun laws in Florida, the law was written before Never Again was formed, and passed less than a month later.   According to the new law, while handguns cannot be purchased until a person reaches the age of 21, rifles remain available.   The NRA subsequently filed a lawsuit against Florida for violation of Constitutional rights with regard to the age regulation.

It is notable that the vast majority of mass shootings involve the use of rifles, whereas handguns represent a very small proportion.

Most recently, threats made by Never Again are no longer veiled.   Highly explosive threats have become the meme as they scream at ICE officials; we ‘know where your children live’ – ‘we are not joking’ – ‘we will come for you and your children’! Despite their claim to peace and passive protest, ICE agents have been the target of assault, ICE facilities have been shot up and bombed. And the Sieg Heil Hitler agenda unravels.

Yes, shooting!

The gun control activists own guns and are using them for destruction and threat of murder.

The three mass shooting that we were just witness to; garlic festival, El Paso, and Dayton all had one common core – Antifa activism.   The David Hogg pacifist, Clooney, Oprah, Spielberg, Katzenberg and our esteemed universities would thus be supporting – ANTIFA.   Guns in the hands of Antifa would seem to be encouraged.   Mass murders would thus be a liberal propaganda tool.

This is incitement.   There is nothing peaceful about it.   And yet, because we are dealing with youth, police action against them is politicized as brutal, aggressive, and evil.

Where is the outrage? Where are these Liberal donors when their money is used to commit violence?

While the movie, The Hunt, has been pulled, the Democrat politicians and Liberal ‘activists’ would seem to support exactly what the movie depicted – the murder of conservatives. The annihilation of a populace in the name of peace. Genocide.

History Lesson:   In 1922, the National Socialists were a youth organization alongside Boy Scouts. By 1933, the National Socialists became known as the Hitler Youth and had a membership 2 million strong.   By 1936, all youth groups were banned with the exception of one – Nazi’s.   By 1939, 90% of German youth belonged to the Nazi Party.   And ultimately, membership in the Nazi Party was compulsory after the age of 6.

They went to summer camps, sang songs, made pledges, and were indoctrinated to believe that anyone who did not conform to their ideologies were evil and should be killed – including their parents.

When people today claim they don’t understand how an entire country would commit such atrocities – look no further than ANTIFA today. They are the brain-child of the global regime looking to recreate what failed in Germany, and transplant it throughout a global sphere.

ANTIFA – is good, peaceful, moral, right, this is the indoctrination promoted by Liberal ranters, Liberal Media, and Liberal politicians.   It is a call to arms!   A call for Genocide.

Fair Warning.

Khizr Khan -A Miserable Con of Saudi Intervention

Khizr Khan came to the US ’empty-handed’ like all immigrants in 1980. And immediately enrolled in a masters program at Harvard where he obtained his law degree…according to most media reports.

Hmmm – REALLY?

While he was born in Pakistan, he was living in the United Arab Emirates before coming to the US at the age of 29. What was he doing in the UAE?   Apparently nothing.  But he did move to the US in 1980 – although he actually was really living in Saudi Arabia…  working in International Trade Law during the 80’s where he was also writing a paper on Wahhabism. Concurrently, he was attending the University of Missouri where he graduated in 1982 with his law degree. How is that possible??  The same Mizzou Law School that was a hotbed of protests and saw the resignation of its President and Chancellor last year.   But how could Khan be going to school in Missouri when he was living in Massachusetts/Maryland – according to his bio? Because his sons were raised in – Maryland.

Discrepancies lay waste to the Truth.

He holds no law license in Maryland, Virginia or DC, (according to his website) but instead states that he is a member of the New York State Bar Association. According to their website – he is not a sustaining member. A search of the New York State registrations shows he was admitted to the Bar in 2010. But his website states that he was practicing law at a ‘major law firm’ from 1998 to 2007 in DC, and then moved to New York in 2007 where he was a Director of Law at a ‘major law firm’ from 2007 to 2010. In addition, he was an adjunct member/professor at Georgetown Law school in 2006… despite the fact that he had never passed the bar anywhere yet!

He has a newly minted website that was created in 2016 thru Godaddy. He claims to be the Founder of ESI Institute New York… but there is no such institute, there is an EDI Institute New York, but it is NOT affiliated with Khan.

His ‘website’ states his office is located at 415 Madison Avenue, 14th Floor, NY. But as of June 2016, a list of tenants does not include his name. Rent in the building starts around $55 sqft per year, and ‘virtual space’ is available on the 14th floor through Regus.

Empty-handed, he managed to put himself through law school and his sons through advanced degree programs, including PhD programs at the University of Virginia. Interesting…  A ‘success’ story the media would have us believe…  Really?   A success in that he was backed by Saudi money!

Electronic Discovery is considered on par with a paralegal, today’s starting salaries range between $69k and $89k. So how did he get thru Harvard? And how did he pay for extensive degrees for his three sons making maybe $50,000 at best twenty years ago?

Tangled Webs.

He holds up what he professes is a Pocket Constitution, but in a screen-grab I could find no book that matched the one he held. Nor was the wording consistent with The Constitution of the United States of America.  Maybe it was in Arabic…

He states that the 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law. But the Amendment has nothing to do with putting a stave on immigration – it has to do with citizens who have been granted citizenship in the US.  Maybe he needs to reread the 14th Amendment…

Making the accusation that Trump is ‘dividing the Muslims’, is like blaming Hillary for Nazi’s… there is no correlation. The division within the Muslims dates back centuries.

While working in Saudi Arabia, he wrote a paper in which he references the contribution to his article by Said Ramadan, a prominent leading figure within the Muslim Brotherhood who died in 1995. The fact that Huma Abedin has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood would fit that possibly she was the one who rooted out Khan to deliver the scathing DNC address to Trump.

But filling in the inconsistencies to his background was poorly executed.

Still, Hillary calling on this man, Mr. Khan, to ask the GOP representatives to repudiate their candidate was rather out of line, bold, and quite presumptuous, an arrogant request against someone who has had business ties with Middle Eastern countries for years, and only served to want an end to radical Muslims who want to annihilate the US. Technically, the SAME agenda served by his son in Iraq!

Perhaps the Saudi link would make sense though given they are tremendous donors to the Clinton Foundation and tit-for-tat, everything is greased. Even a Manhattan Office. An education at Harvard and the University of Virginia can be greased.

Mr. Khan’s residence would appear to remain in Charlottesville, Virginia, a house and acreage bought in his name in 2010. There is no listing for his residence in New York. Which would explain the ‘virtual office’ and a website dated 2016…

What we don’t know about Khan is a whole lot more than what we do know.  To have such a person making presidential demands is quite disturbing!  To have such a person support a candidate who faces innumerable potential crimes is even more disturbing.

Soros Goes Both Ways – in Politics

If banning Muslims from entering the US means they are going to make a beeline for the ISIS recruitment line, then gee, they probably weren’t the best candidates for asylum or refugee status in the first place!

The notion that ‘not giving in’ means they will get mad and kill us instead is the most bizarre logic I have heard yet!  As in, we’ll let you in if you pinky swear not to kill us..  That is acting in fear. That is acting cowardly. That is caving to their ideology. What it is NOT – is guaranteeing the safety and security of this country which is a politician’s job according to our Constitution.

I must have missed the ‘pandering’ clause in our Constitution.

If you have cancer in your body and the doctor says he wants to inject just a few more cancer cells into your bloodstream because he needs to get rid of the cells he has leftover in the vial he has hanging around…is that a cure? Or is it death?

And the notion that we have to take these Syrian immigrants as our fair share, well does that mean we’re going to airlift half the extra 11 million illegals we already have in this country to Europe? Hello? They need to take their fair share…

Yes this country was founded on immigrants, I am a mutt along with most everyone here. But we didn’t come here vowing to destroy this country, we came to find a refuge, a sanctuary where we could be safe from the tyranny of Europe. Australia, have you forgotten your roots? You were shipped out of England from debtor prison so they could be rid of you. The Irish were shipped out as slaves. And our borders have been open to scores! But now we have a problem, and our very existence is at stake, so we need to assure our survival as who we are.  It is that simple.

The agenda is to create an empire so vast, that it consumes Africa, Europe, the US and the Middle East. The toppling of the US was considered a conquest more arrogant, more challenging than any other country. If that could be achieved, then harnessing the world into a One World Order would be possible. Except – for Russia and China. South America has no more world power, their economy in the toilet. Russia was a target, and killing oil was believed to be the answer. But Russia is much more resilient than anticipated, as in – ‘never underestimate your enemy’.  And Soros is flawed…

China is much more complex. Soros attempted to manipulate their markets back in June, only to sell off in August. His efforts were akin to a fly buzzing about annoyingly – swatted and dead.  But we can be sure he has not given up.  I give him that.

Owning the US is complex.  Obama was the beginning, but he lost face and favor.  Hillary was the screaming brat in the background demanding mememememe.  So, she became the frontrunner for the Democrat Party. But then her closest advisor. personal something, Huma Abedin, was caught saying that Hillary is “frequently very confused”.   That will prove to be many miles of posterity in the coming campaign.

So how does Soros stand with the Republican candidates, we know Hillary is his puppet, but Soros swings both ways:

  • Jeb Bush: Bush got my hairs bristling when he first defined Trump as ‘chaos’. Chaos is a Soros word, it is used extensively in the power play for creating the One World agenda. It was Karl Popper’s pet word for how to create control – thru chaos. Bush’s use of the word made me do more research.Apparently Bush is not without connections to Soros. Specifically, HNA Group, a Chinese private equity firm which was started with financing by Soros and Chen Feng. HNA invested in Bush’s private equity firm, BH Logistics, and BH invested the money in Dorian LPG, a gas shipping company incorporated in the Marshall Islands.

    What does that mean? When Bush was thinking about entering the race, he needed a lot of capital and quickly. By typical standards, he was the poor relative – like Biden. After a number of failed investments, Bush’s net worth suddenly went from $1.3 million to $19 million beginning in 2014! Not a bad profit margin – 1300%! But it certainly speaks volumes of ‘I sold my soul’, as in Obama – as in Clinton. From poverty (by their standards) to wealth in a poof! Obama had nothing, and Clinton claimed they were ‘broke’. Suddenly, they were both flourishing quite handsomely! And suddenly Soros was their Master.

    In addition, Tenet Healthcare paid Bush upwards of $2million and made generous contributions to his campaign. Tenet was slated to be the sugardaddy of  Obamacare. Ouch. Are we sure Bush is a Republican?

Normally, Soros gets his way, and if he promised Bush the Republican nomination, he lost the gamble with Bush barely holding onto a lousy 2% and spewing hate words at Trump, “Donald Trump is a jerk.” Really? Sounds kindof elementary school to me…or Trumpish, as in nannynannypoopoo.

The only interesting potential of a Bush-Hillary stand-off would be a third party candidate. In my opinion, in that instance, the third party would stand a very good chance of winning. Who-oh-who could that be…?  Well, Trump has lately stated that he would never ever ever in a gazillion years consider a third party candidacy. Unless, he changes his mind.  On the other side, Bernie is fuming and has intimated – he might.

TRUMP -Divide and Conquer

Hypocrisy.

We hear it daily. Sometimes from the media, sometimes from our work, sometimes from our friends and family. It makes it no less cringing who or where it comes from. One of the more popularized comes on the heels of a statement made by Trump regarding his stance of future immigration of Muslims into the US.

Netanyahu responded to Trump’s statement with the most ridiculous, hypocritical statement of all; “Israel respects all religions.” He said this to raise his own ethical commitment while denouncing Trump’s, and shooting a few Palestinians.  Maybe the key in this absurd statement is ‘respect’. What does it mean to respect someone? According to Webster it is – ‘deep admiration and high esteem…honor, high regard, reverence.’ I fail to hear anything remotely likening to reverence in Netanyahu’s vision of Muslims.

Trump made the inflammatory, not-politically-correct statement that if elected he would close the US borders to entry/immigration by Muslims – for a while – until the threat of ISIS could be truly eradicated – as opposed to Obama’s historically infamous, ‘they are contained’.   And surprise a firestorm erupted and the media went wild with more publicity!

Netanyahu take note:  Israel is divided culturally as follows; 75% Jewish, 18% Muslim and 4% Christian – the balance is ‘other’. Of the 75% Jewish, 67% say they are non-religious, secular or atheist. The northern region of Israel has the highest concentration of Arabs, and assimilation is filled with tension and conflict. It is hardly a bedrock of ‘respect’. I think it would be prudent for Netanyahu to remain disassociated. In his attempt to use the comparison of Jewish people being disqualified from admittance is not only hypocritical it is eerily pathological.

Israel vehemently decries fear of Iran despite the fact that Iran has never instigated war. Israel is taking in exactly zero, as in -0-, Syrian refugees. Why?  Because they are potentially terrorist.   Hmmm.

Is Trump’s suggestion even legal?

The rhetoric is that his suggestion is unconstitutional and inflammatory and inciting hate. First, and most importantly, the Constitution applies to US citizens. “We the people of the United States…” It does not apply to peoples from other countries. Constitutional rights are a benefit granted citizens of the US. Anyone who is not a citizen is not abridged of these rights because they have yet to apply.

“Insure domestic tranquility” – meaning we are guaranteed a peaceful and harmonious existence through the protection of our police force.

“Provide for the common defense” – meaning that if a threat is perceived, we have the right to act accordingly to protect ourselves and our nation from a hostile takeover.

When politicians don’t even know the verbiage or language of the Constitution that they are called to uphold, when they have no knowledge of it’s purpose, its mission, and its authority, they, not Trump should be called to the plate. Whether you are for or against Trump, make sure you do not add to the mistakes of mis-speech!

That being said:

Trump has again threatened to convert his stance to that of Independent. Why?  What would this accomplish?

By aligning with the Republican Party, (Trump was a Democrat just a few years ago), he created a following. Converting mid-stream to Independent and taking that following away from the Republican Party creates a wider division and the opportunity for the Democrats to garner a higher percentage of the votes.   In other words, the Democrats would take a win by default as opposed to actual election by a majority of the citizens.  Hillary could be elected despite her corruption, fraud and illegalities.  Or Sanders could be elected in a sweep of Communism disguised as Socialism.

This would be the Soros decoy tactic assuring a liberal win with a much smaller point margin. In 1968, Nixon barely beat out Humphrey after Independent candidate, Wallace took 13.5% of the votes. In 1980, John Anderson, a Republican, jumped ship to run as an Independent taking just 6.6% of the votes. Reagan won by a landslide against Carter whose record was abysmal. And in 1912, Teddy Roosevelt lost as a Republican and created a new party, The Progressive Party, giving the election to Democrat, Woodrow Wilson in a very contentious campaign of mudslinging.

The last time a third party candidate actually won was in 1860 when Abraham Lincoln, whose political affiliation also wavered from Whig to Republican to National Union, with a mere 39% of the votes. It is worth noting that the Republican Party in his era was actually what our Democrat Party is today.   The Whig Party merged into the Republican Party in 1856 due to their shared ideology of ‘liberalism’ and supremacy of Congress. In 1864 the Republicans created a new party, The War Democrats, and Whig Republicans countered with their new name, National Unionists.  Lincoln was actually not terribly popular, but won based on a dispersion of the votes.

The most noteworthy effect a third party candidacy has historically created is division. Dividing the vote so as to allow the party that is strongest to become weakened.

Trump? Is that the Soros agenda?

“Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it.” ~ Mark Twain

 

SOROS – The Master Puppeteer: Who will be his successors?

Most people in Europe are well aware of the name, George Soros. A good portion of the people elsewhere are somewhat familiar with his dealings. But it is only a fragment of the US population that would appear to have any idea of the magnitude of the Soros empire and it’s agenda.

There is a contingent of people who acknowledge that president Obama seems to be a ‘puppet’ waiting on any catastrophic event for guidance. Usually four days is the advance that Obama requires before speaking publicly about corruption, fraud, cover-ups, disasters, etc…

But even fewer seem to know the fringe circle of allies, Tom Steyer and Pierre Omidyar, whose power, political clout and money drive the decisions in Washington. Perhaps they are the a part of those who will succeed Soros as his legacy of Karl Popper, Communism, and Liberal Socialism continue to grow.

Pierre Omidyar: An Iranian American who founded Ebay, Pierre, like Soros, on the surface of edited bio’s appears to be a philanthropist who just wants to see good things happen. But as it happens, Omidyar was entrenched in financing the ‘regime change’ of Ukraine and helped organize the Maiden Revolution. He voluntarily hands over all available personal data on Ebay and PayPal subscribers to the government boasting that he has helped the police arrest thousands around the world. It is filtering process that helps to enforce the agenda.

It is said that he has buried several months worth of food supplies in Nevada, Hawaii, France, and Montana in anticipation of a pandemic. He invested in a company, Maui Land and Pineapple, which was busted by the US feds for being the largest human trafficking organization ever. He was investigated and sued by Congress for ‘spinning stocks’ and investing illegally in IPO’s with Goldman Sachs.

And he is an avid guest of the Obama’s at the White House.

In 2013 he started a new online journalistic front, First Look Media, which he claimed was going to be the front runner in independent and unbiased reporting. Glenn Greenwald and Ken Silverstein were his front team, Silverstein and a number of other team members have since quit citing a complete absence of management. But it is the lust for power and more money that would seem to drive the persona of Mr. Pierre. From microfinancing schemes in India in which profit was the sole motive, to land grabs for development and agriculture gains, to wielding a big stick in the US education system, to advocating First Amendment Rights when it comes to perhaps furthering ‘his’ personal agenda, the man is obsessed with power.

While his news agency, Intercept, is guided by principle, whose principle would seem to be the grinding wedge that has many questioning reality verses motive. In August 2014, the FBI stated it would be investigating the leaked, classified documents cited in one of Intercept’s article/blogs. Shortly thereafter, Intercept announced that all US military personnel were banned from reading its blog. A rather bold statement of censorship. Apparently, the target for much of the Intercept would seem to be the US military intelligence.

When probed, Glenn Greenwald declared that the personal donations, political views, etc… are no concern to him when writing for the man’s paper. In other words, ethics is of no concern. He has partnered with the Clinton’s in their foundation work, and established a $200 million fund to partner with the USAID, a US government organization. Omidyar’s foundation, Humanity United, shares a donor list similar to that of George Soros, including; Amnesty International, Center for American Progress, Human Rights First, Human Rights Watch, and more.

Tom Steyer: Hedge fund manager and green advocate whose battles against the Keystone pipeline and the coal industry have earned him honors as a hypocrite. While advocating heavily against Keystone, Steyer’s hedge fund invested in the Kinder Morgan competitive pipeline, which links Alberta with Vancouver, BC, as well as the Cochin natural gas pipeline between Western Canada and the US Midwest.

Steyer made his fortune as the founder of Farallon Capital Management, a fund that invested heavily in fossil fuels and the Kinder Morgan Pipeline. Although these investments were sold sometime between 2012 and 2014 when he retired to pursue ‘politics’. However, the fact remains that this is where his billions began and where he accumulated his power.

He is a political activist who has petitioned the White House to ramp up the Global Warming Initiative and advocate for green energy. He too is involved in the Soros organization, Democracy Alliance which requires an annual membership fee of $200,000. Their candidate of choice would appear to be Elizabeth Warren whose politics and policies support greater funding of groups fighting issues on a state level – such as freedom of speech, ie blasting religious institutes and their causes. Their aim is to boost liberal ideals on a state level including their launching of The Center for American Progress and Media Matters. The purpose – to squash the founding Constitution and replace it with a new and improved Constitution.

Where do these individuals and organizations go? Why is it important?

George Soros is old. He needs to hand over the baton. Both Steyer and Omidyar are relatively young – in their 40’s and 50’s. He needs minds that are similar, money that is engorged, and youth that can carry the One World Order to the next level. Regime Change is a part of that agenda. Civil chaos is a part of that agenda. And while both Steyer and Omidyar appear to be proponents of charity and philanthropy on the surface, so did Soros before the unraveling began.

Imagine such a world. John Lennon did.