Carl Bernstein attacks the media – and then attacks Trump for attacking the media

Carl Bernstein attacking Trump is a pinch of pepper, a dash of salt, and a cupful of chili sauce.   A man well worn in his multiple marriages, brutal affairs, and arrogant boasting of sexual encounters is calling Trump a ‘liar’. Hmmmm.

Running low on fame he acquired in the Watergate era of Nixon some 45 years ago, Bernstein himself failed to reveal that he was raised by parents who wholly embraced Communism. Which amounts to – a lie. Still, he attacks Trump for being a racist ‘just like his father’ while forcibly admitting his own parents were Communists. So, is Carl Bernstein a Communist just like his father?

In 1992, Bernstein wrote a story titled, “The Idiot Culture” in which he exposes the puppetry of people believing whatever the media manufacturers for them.  He writes, “…the American media is illusionary and delusionary—disfigured, unreal, disconnected from the true context of our lives…”

In 2002, his commentary of working for the Washington Post was less than complimentary claiming the paper was biased, sterile, and conformist. Sounds a lot like Trump’s comments…

Today, Carl Bernstein denounces Trump’s statements against the press stating Trump as being divisive and treacherous.   But a few years ago Bernstein was quoted as saying, “The lowest form of popular culture – lack of information, misinformation, misinformation, and a contempt for the truth or the reality of most people’s lives – has overrun real journalism,” Carl Bernstein has said. “Today, ordinary Americans are being stuffed with garbage.”

Huh.  So, which is it Mr. Bernstein? Because it would appear you have turned on a dime and become much like what you abhor. Hypocrisy on the Communist left is so commonplace today that we barely blink when we hear of it again.

Unfortunately, Bernstein’s hero status in breaking the Watergate story is now muddied by a Communist agenda against Nixon personally.   And what we have left is a man who sowed many lies and adulterous relations pointing a gnarly finger at our US President, when in fact these are the opinions of a Marxist extremist, biased, Hillary lover, hypocritical denouncer who fails to acknowledge the actions of Obama in his cabinet firings and hirings, and instead promotes a shill commentary about Trump all the while making the exact same allegations himself – in prior years.

Every article written by Bernstein, every statement that is quoted, has to remind us that this is the same Bernstein who unabashedly uncovered the Watergate scandal as though he is desperately attempting to reclaim some prestige to his name.  Or attempt to use the Watergate fame as a basis for his Trump bashing.  In either case, his own hypocrisy makes him appear quite comical.

In fact, as history goes, even the Watergate scandal is now dissected from a different standpoint as it is claimed Nixon was supposed to be a Rothschild puppet, and instead decided to go rogue.  And so the globalists needed to bring him down.

FYI: Bernstein had no background in journalism, never got a college degree, and was hired by the Washington Post anyway. Woodward had a BA degree, spent five years in the navy and was denied a position at the Post because he wasn’t “qualified”.  

While Woodward is less demonstrative and hypocritical in his evaluation of Trump, he too has been criticized for fabricating information, stretching the truth and ‘forgetting’ the actual lay of the facts. His usefulness in the Watergate creation was promulgated not on his journalistic flare, but rather his government ‘connections’, i.e., Deep Throat.

Like Bernstein, his career and respect floundered, his only real traction being Watergate despite having written numerous books – and ultimately fiction.  Suddenly, in his seventies, he has been trumped up to provide insight in Trump while being paid by Liberal sources.

He regularly donates to his personal foundation which gives to charities like “Sidwell Friends School”, the same $35000 to $50000 per year school in DC where Obama sent his girls. They must have one heck ofa budget!  Hello?

These are the men who declare that Trump’s mental capacity to serve should be questioned by the media… As they desperately try and reclaim their lost fame, as the truth about Watergate becomes more revealing, as their own prominence unravels to reveal they were used as puppets, it is easier to see that – they are simply puppeting what they are told to say like dutiful – well, puppets.

Some things never change.

Tucker Carlson vs Caroline Heldman – 90% Tax Bracket

Professor Caroline Heldman was on Tucker Carlson advocating for much higher tax rates on the 1%ers, claiming that Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations were examples of what it meant to ‘pay their fair share’.  

Eisenhower: In 1954 the adjusted gross income of all tax returns amounted to about $229 billion, with a total tax liability of about $26.7 billion or roughly 9% tax revenue on all income.

In 2015, the IRS raked in $3.25 Trillion in tax revenue, of that $1.54 Trillion was individual income tax. Total payroll in 2015 was roughly $16 Trillion. That equates to roughly 9% tax on revenue. The same as during the Eisenhower administration.

So what is a fair share?

What is the current distribution of tax revenue? The top 1% of all income earners paid 45.7% of all federal income taxes, but earned 17.1% of all income in the U.S. The top 20% paid 83.9% of all federal income taxes, after earning 51.9% of all income in America. The middle 20% of income earners paid 5.9% of all federal income taxes, but earned 14.8% of all income.

During Eisenhower, the top tier tax rate applied to those making $400,000 which converts to about $3.622 million in today’s dollars. The problem is the fair sharers are using $390,000 as the 1% measure. That would equate to about $38,000 in 1950 which was taxed at roughly 48%.

But even this isn’t a fair measure because it doesn’t account for all the revenue that is diverted out of the US in order to avoid/evade tax.   Income concentration today is roughly the same as it was post The Great Depression in the 1920’s when most of the wealth was held by the top tier elites.   Taxing them to death is not going to create a ‘redistribution’ of wealth, it only means they will ‘evade’ further through tax havens.

Taxing the wealthy is rather simplistic. It doesn’t solve income disparity, it merely means the government is potentially wealthier, thus expanding their already burgeoning expenditures and welfare. In addition, Mz. Heldman failed to note the economic, political, and social courses of the Eisenhower administration.

His cabinet was dubbed ‘eight millionaires and a plumber’. His policies were geared toward the annihilation of communism, securing Iranian oil, threatening China, demanding Russia agree to a reduction of nuclear arms, massive infrastructure spending, fighting the far right GOP good ole boys, promoting technology development, thawing the Cold War, balancing the budget, and putting America First.

He wasn’t the best, made blunders, and had failures, but he had successes too.

That being said, Mz. Heldman’s view is certainly not of the caliber of someone whose education includes a PhD given it was driven without any statistics, proven analysis, or in-depth thinking and deserved the response she got from Carlson – a laugh.

Interestingly, Mz. Heldman has a number of bio’s that offer different accomplishments including co-founder of New Orleans Women’s Shelter, co-founder of critical Response, leadership position with Common Ground, co-founded End Rape on Campus, and more. Oddly; None of these organizations mention her by name as having anything to do with their leadership or founding…?

Her bio also states she wrote a book; The War On Women’s Bodies in 2016 – but oddly it doesn’t come up in any Google search?

Her Occidental bio also states she ‘co-authored’ the book, Rethinking Madame President, when in fact she ‘co-edited’ the book. Oops. It’s important to truthful.

Syria; Chemical Weapons?

The Syrian war is such a universal mess it is completely unfathomable why. The list of countries bombing Syria includes: US, UK, Germany, France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Qatar, Belgium, Bahrain, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Italy, Turkey, and UAE.   And yet – with all that in play – ISIS, comprised of about 100,000 fighters by best guess, has actually – grown…

Five years later, a country is completely destroyed, but ISIS and al Qaeda seem to be doing just fine. What kind of military intelligence is conducting this massive catastrophe?   In WWII, Hitler’s army was comprised of over 18 million.   In the Gulf War against Iraq we fought against 650,000 troops and it lasted one month.

We have fake videos showing faked casualties, faked attacks, and apparently a complete inability to determine who is doing what where because we don’t seem to know who is bombing whom at any given time and so the rhetoric is US vs Assad.

Adding to the confusion, weapons are being sold indiscriminately to all related countries by both the US and Russia. It used to be that we could verify who was doing what via satellite imagery, but those too have been doctored to present false information.   So we turned to witnesses on the ground. But they have no factual bearing either as each side presents their propaganda witness.

Recently the US press has begun a campaign of parading previous Syrian victims as their source of information. Hillary capitalized on this propaganda method during her campaign, and the media have recently jumped osn the proverbial bandwagon creating chemical weapon victims. One, used to work for the Clinton Global Initiative… and the other one claims to have escaped after the August 2013 chemical weapon attack, only to show up in the US in September 2013 and start a Twitter account in English…

It’s interesting to note who is retweeted on this Twitter account of Mr. Kassem Eid. It would include Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch, a George Soros organization. There is Liz Sly of the Washington Post. The Daily Beast who has on it’s board Chelsea Clinton. The Syrian Network For Human Rights, a UK based organization that was an offshoot of the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, both one man shows located in the UK. And the very shadowy Eliot Higgins or Bellingcat also from the UK , a stay at home dad married to a Turkish woman who suddenly rose to fame as a weapons analyst…

The information being parlayed is always the same, makes statements of fact without any corroborating evidence, and is continually restated, reTweeted, rehashed by the mainstream media. The idea being if you say it enough, if multiple sources say the same thing – then it must be factual and evidence is no longer necessary.

Now we have Fox News using the fact checker of The Washington Post against Rice, and the mire is so thick we cannot possibly know what is fact or fiction. It is no different than asking Hillary who’s on first in Benghazi!   All it proves is that Rice is going down and she is the Democrat’s scapegoat.

We also now know that the riff between Bannon and Kushner was about Syria. Kushner won – and Syria was bombed without any verifiable evidence other than a statement made by the White Helmets, an organization created in and funded by the UK that ultimately shifted its funding to the US taxpayers. There are photos and videos linking them to complicity with al-Nusra. For their propaganda, they use the Aleppo Media Center to provide ‘pictures’ for release to US and UK media. The authenticity of these photos is questionable…at best.  And certainly completely and openly biased.

Tillerson blaming Russia for their failure to eliminate the chemical weapons in Syria is childish. The OPCW, a Norwegian organization, was tasked with the elimination. They work in cooperation with the UN. It’s latest news brief has declared that they are ‘investigating the claim of chemical weapons use in Syria’. Below is what the OPCW stated in 2016 with regard to the continued use of chemical weapons:

“At a time when the likelihood of states using chemical weapons has become distant, non-state actors – in Syria and Iraq – have not only sought to acquire such weapons, but have also used them. What this means is that chemical terrorism is no longer a theoretical proposition or even imminent threat, but a stark reality. It is also a reality that could affect many more of us across the globe over coming years as foreign fighters return to their homelands with experiences gained in Syria and Iraq.”

There are six countries known to house stashes of chemical weapons: US, Russia, Egypt, Israel, North Korea and South Sudan. However, what the OPCW acknowledges is that ‘non-state actors’, as in terrorists, have stockpiles that cannot be contained.  Recklessness was the Democrat and Republican war hawks agenda, The People are more concerned about the Saudi’s than Assad where Sharia Law, beheadings, human rights violations, war mongering in Yemen, ethnic cleansing, and genocide are all tolerated for some reason… could it be The Swamp back-scratching???

Fox’s Fake News: Syria by Russia Design

Fox News has headlined an article in which it claims; “In Syria there are more war crimes, more peace talks and more radicalization by – Russia Design”.   Huh. Where’s the proof?   Their primary source citation is The Institute For The Study of War. Sounds impressive – right?   Until, unless one does a bit of research and it is easily disseminated:

The CEO is a Kimberly Kagan. The first, most obvious foul is the fact that her husband’s brother is married to Victoria Nuland. The same Nuland advocating for war with Russia. The same Nuland deciding who should run Ukraine after the coup – Nuland.

The second most obvious foul is that this obscure little non-profit, The Institute for The Study of War, claims it gets all it’s funding from Raytheon, General Dynamics and DynCorp.   As in no conflict of interest there!   So for all the call to arms The Institute will pass the arms contracts to their funders.   Nice tight package.

Third foul, Fox News is using the very credible Institute For The Study of War which had within it’s bowels, Elizabeth O’Bagy.   A registered Democrat, she lied on her resume that she had earned her PhD from Georgetown, and was used by war-mongering McCain and Kerry to assist in evaluating the need to go to war with Syria. After she was disgraced and fired from The Institute, 2 weeks later McCain hired her on his personal staff as a ‘legislative assistant’.   Another tight package.

Jonathan Maunter of The Institute was used as a source for another Fox article in which the author claimed – “Russia and Assad Bombing of Civilians Continues as UN Peace Process Staggers”.   According to the website for The Institute, Maunter doesn’t even work there???   Oops.  In this article they also reference the Syria Institute as a reliable source.

The Syria Institute is run by 33 year old Valerie Szybala and was formed September 2015. They apparently get their funding by asking for donations via Facebook…  They claim to be aligned with the ever famous – Foundation For Justice and Development. This non-profit is so non-profit it doesn’t even have to file a Form 990 because they don’t make enough money. It refers comments to Ismael Basha, who is an unknown.

The man writing these incredibly opinionated and flagrantly unsourced, propaganda/articles is George Russell, described as an “Editor at-large at Fox News”. Outside of that his bio includes a recommendation by The Economist, the Rothschild media outlet.

Good Grief Charley Brown – Is that the best you can do Fox?

In conclusion: We have an aging journalist with not much presence other than Fox since 2004 and a probable link to Liberal ideologies via The Economist, who utilizes as his sources for articles weak, Liberal, agenda oriented, Nuland connected, war-mongers, and organizations that barely exist and have just recently been formed by people that appear to by Syrian or Saudi…

Given that Fox is partially owned by the Saudi’s, the Saudi connection to discredit Assad and demonize Russia via propaganda that is easily shred by anyone with five spare minutes, makes the entire fiasco rather pathetically childish.

FOX – shame on you! What a Sham.

Townhall Nightmares – Paid Pro’s

A trip down memory lane – Obama’s Press Conferences!

The first one he gave wasn’t until February 9, 2009. After giving a rather lengthy discourse in which he blames everything on Bush, vows to create 4 million new jobs, save homeownership, and make sure the financial system is ‘working again’ – whatever that means.

Obama job creation was right in there with George Bush for his first term, second term numbers not finalized.

Home ownership dropped by about 4-5%,

and Banks are posting enormous losses…

  1. His first appointed question came from Reuters about Iran relations. Obama’s response was to state that the previous president built up a lot of ‘mistrust’, and he was going to fix that.
  1. The next from Chip Reid, a liberal who had recently been appointed to CBS by NBC. He asked about Bipartisanship. Obama’s response? “There have been a lot of bad habits built up here…”.
  1. He then called on Chuck Todd, asking where he was, because he didn’t see him but knew that the question was most likely already staged. Chuck Todd was the iberal from NBC and MSNBC. He asked about the financial stresses of credit. Obama answered by blaming the banking institutions for tight money and claiming his solution was to loosen credit restrictions.  Which he never managed to do.
  1. His next question came from Bloomberg – a liberal publisher. The question was also directed at the financial crisis. Obama claimed to have averted the worst by passing TARP, which was actually passed by Bush – and Obama’s claim to WE was misrepresentational. He then deferred the questions to the Secretary of Treasury.
  1. Jake was the name of his next questioner, no reference to last name or news outlet. CNN was searched out, “Ed Henry, Where’s Ed Henry, CNN?
  1. Then Helene Cooper of the New York Times, who he also ‘searched out’, “Helene Cooper, where’s Helene?” Deferred the question to Secretary of Treasury.
  1. Major Garrett, whose affiliation is broad having worked for CNN, Fox and MSNBC. He too was “searched out for a question”. He asked about some secret conversation Obama had with Biden and would the President come clean. He said he didn’t remember the conversation.
  1. Then there was Michael Fletcher of the Washington Post who asked a question about steroid use by the Texas Rangers …what?

There was a question from Helen somebody, then the Huffington Post, “Where’s Sam”? His question related to setting up a ‘Truth Committee’ to investigate Bush. And last from Mara Liasson of NPR who asked ‘again’ about bipartisanship to which he ‘again’ deferred.

Hardly a snappy performance – and obviously a staged one in asking specific journalists whose question were most likely previously agreed to and thus staged answers.

And while it’s true that we have known for decades that politicians pay actors to show up at their events as rallying supporters, the dimension of the targeted attacks at the recent Townhalls is truly unprecedented and over-the-top. Hecklers are a dime a dozen, but it used to be fair game to also ‘have them removed’.   Sometimes forcefully, if necessary.

It is also interesting to note that in 2009 and 2011, The Washington Post and Huffington Post labeled these hecklers as “evil conspirators staging scenes for UTube”. They went on to say that these hecklers were crazies exploited by the elites during the bloom of liberal ascendancy.

Even more interesting is a report by The Washington Post in which it comments about the hecklers as being more ferocious and gang-like – at Republican Townhalls. So even when Obama was president, the voices were most vociferous at Republican events. Of course, WAPO suggests that these hecklers are more a nuisance and political theater, and we should not pay attention.  That was then – now, it is quite different…

It’s always fun to toss words back in the face of a media source that flip-flops it’s indignation so righteously.

Of course let us not forget all the times Obama went out on a limb to diss Fox News, Rupert Murdoch, and Republican’s on CNN, via the State Department, Politico, CNBC, and all major networks via his numerous appearances on late night television!

The BULLY just got BULLIED – and is whining…no fair.

A Failed Coup In Montenegro

The Telegraph is ‘Breaking A Story’ that is four months old citing evidence that they don’t reveal, people they don’t name as sources, and a headline statement that is most certainly deficient of anything but tabloidism.

A Little Birdie Told Me…

A foiled coup in Montenegro in October 2016 was levied by 20 Serbs including a ‘retired police officer’ – as initially reported by The New York Times. The President, who later stepped down, Milo Djukanovic, was a Communist layaway from 15 years prior, who was involved in Organized Crime, tolerated graft, corruption, misleading information and was even accused of fabricating the coup to suppress voter turnout.

Not exactly a cream of the crop kinda guy.

And despite ‘stepping down’ he handed the baton to his closest ally while he pulls the strings in the shadows.   Sound familiar?  Not exactly the gasp coup that The Telegraph is headlining. Obviously, they didn’t do their homework.

And lest we forget, these are the same nationalist Serbians who have been implicated in all kinds of historical malfeasance, including instigating WWI. Oddly, the Serbs aren’t mentioned at all in the Telegraph article.   DANG!

In fact, the entire article is upside down topsy turvy in that it claims the attempted coup was to sway the alliance of Montenegro toward Russia instead of the EU. While The New York Times claims that Milo Djukanovic withdrawing as Prime Minister actually helps Montenegro’s bid to gain EU status or citizenship.  So the coup would have benefited the EU – not Russia.

Why did he need to go?  Because he was a Communist and linked to Organized Crime, not a good resume for an EU integration!

Which means that the entire Telegraph story is basackwards.   In fact, it is sounding eerily similar to the Trump Dossier that backfired so badly.

Trump’s REAL Friends and Allies

While verbose Liberal media outlets continue to peddle news that is regurgitated as journalism, there is always Truth hidden somewhere in the basement that is much more interesting… The newest levy of hatred is to conjure up a relationship from 40 years ago and classify it as something pertinent. When impertinence is the rule.

Roy Cohn, a lawyer, a cynic, a deeply disturbed man who was involved in the McCarthy era trials, who had no compunction about who he would represent as an attorney – is being hailed as Trump’s best friend and mentor…

Why? Because it is tabloidish news. And it fuels more hatred.

Roy Cohn was disliked by most everyone, but he had a cut-throat reputation as an attorney, and as such was hired by Trump at the ripe age of 27 to represent him in a lawsuit. From the media’s standpoint, they would have us believe that thereafter Trump and Cohn were best buddies… But they weren’t.

The “news outlets’ running with the story are all printing the same verbiage under the headings of; The Washington Post, Politico, New York Times, Huffington Post, Salon, etc… All targeting an ‘agenda’ without bothering to give any facts.

The real friendship that they ignore, is one that truly comes from respect, heart and loyalty. Tom Barrack. Thomas Barrack is of Lebanese descent, married, and a man who believes in helping others in need. A steadfast, grounded man who together with Rob Lowe bought Miramax Studios, helped a failing Michael Jackson save Neverland from foreclosure, has visited Syrian refugee camps, and amassed a fortune in real estate through his company, Colony.

Having spent some 35 years as friends, they share commonalities that created a rooted and genuine friendship. Most importantly, a friendship molded in trust and loyalty, values highly respected by both Trump and Barrack.

It’s easy to understand why Mr. Trump has few friends when their loyalty seems so precarious that they fly at any given whim showing that their true friendship never really existed, it was only created for some self righteous ‘benefit’. Cases in point; Joe Scarborough and Russell Simmons.

These men all turned on a dime, their friendship removed because they didn’t agree on a policy or a perceived policy. Russell Simmons audaciously wrote an ‘open letter’ so that the world would know – a rather narcissistic celebration of self appointment. Joe Scarborough is a rabid Liberal media pundit who works for one of the most Liberal outlets; MSNBC. He simply jumped ship because the bandwagon was moving on without him.

As the saying goes, ‘who needs enemies with friends like these’?

Although Roger Stone has been media lashed and bashed as going anti-Trump, his new book would indicate a quite different appraisal of the events, the circumstances, and the craziness that exists within every campaign, Trump’s no exception to the rule.

And while Trump may not have a few hundred friends, like the Hollywood cabal believe is appropriate, he does have some incredibly close friends who number few, but whose loyalty and respect is more worthy than a thousand Hollywood elitists who haven’t yet distinguished between an acquaintance and a friend and whose loyalty is only as good as the $$$$$ reaped.

And lest we forget, Bill Ayers, is and was Obama’s closest friend, supposedly wrote Obama’s Book, and advised him on national and international matters.  The same Bill Ayers who professed Communism, Black “Nationalism”, routinely bombed government buildings and killed three of his own members while accidentally detonating a – bomb.  Now there’s a real friend!

Amnesty International – A Propaganda Machine

Amnesty International’s, Salil Shetty, has taken a scathingly political position against Trump. While Amnesty claims impartiality, and usually references ‘a country’ as opposed to it’s President, they have decided to abandon that rule and attack Trump.

In it’s most recent diatribe, it lists numerous infractions of Human Rights at the behest of Trump.  In contrast, when discussing atrocities committed by Ukraine, Amnesty references ‘the rebels’ and ‘Kiev’, when discussing UAE, it references the ‘authorities’, and in Belgium it is ‘Parliament’.  This attack on Trump is a personal agenda ordered by Soros.

One of Shetty’s accusation against Trump states that by not funding international NGO’s who perform abortions, Trump is denying the human right to abortion. OUCH! When did ‘abortion become a human right’?

The UN attempted to unify the right to abortion as a part of International Law. However, International Law is specifically confined to treaty’s among states. Imposing it’s own moral obligation on the world is more than a bit ‘over-stepping’ their boundaries. It would be no different than requiring all women to wear Burqa’s. Morality is NOT an International Law.

In addition, Amnesty’s Salil Shetty attacks Trump for the Mexico border wall, for the temporary halt to Syrian refugees and the temporary ban on refugees from 7 terrorist countries in the Middle East and North Africa. All violations of human rights according to Mr Shetty. Is immigration a Human Right?

The argument for immigration contests it is a ‘moral right or moral obligation’. Whereas the opposition claims that states have the right to set their own laws within sovereignty. Given there is no universal conclusion one way or the other, it is a deference to sovereign nations to make their choices without any ‘body/person’ denouncing such. The laws of each state are thus free to govern themselves.

We have yet to elect a King of the world, or a moral court of the world whose job it is to govern and restrict and apply global laws upon nations. In fact, it was this ideology of Obama/Hillarygate/Soros that The People rejected.  That rejection has brought about a Soros War.

Amnesty has sparked outrage by making another radical statement claiming that Syria unjustly killed and tortured 13,000 prisoners at the hands of Assad. However, when reading the ‘fine print’, Amnesty has somewhat fabricated a conclusion based on an interesting jumble of information, including using evidence from the Syrian Network For Human Rights, SNHR.

Like the Syrian Observatory For Human Rights, the SNHR is a one man show. One man who lives in the UK, who has no background, and who adamantly and openly hates Assad.   Neither of these ‘organizations’ list their funding although it is widely believed to come from the UK’s GCHQ.  

BOTH organizations claim to have ‘a network of spies on the ground in Syria with whom they converse daily for information’.   Like SOHR, Fadel Abdulghani, the Director of Syrian Network of Human Rights, lists absolutely no previous background or history on social media sites. He never existed prior to becoming an expert…and Chairperson of his one man show…

But it gets worse:   Fadel Abdulghani is aligned with the National Council of Resistance of Iran, which the US and Australia consider an alias of MEK. MEK, headed by Maryam Rajavi was considered a terrorist organization by the US as of 2003 and was delisted in 2012.

It gets worse: The delisting of MEK as a terrorist organization was made by then Secretary of State – Hillary Clinton!


Thus it would appear that one of Amnesty International’s prime source for their claim that Assad tortured and murdered 13,000 comes from one man who is affiliated with a former terrorist organization who has no background or previous experience and who would seem to have been ‘created’ from thin air…and possibly funded by GCHQ!  Wow!

Apparently, Maryam Rajavi openly declares that she is the leading advocate and voice to ‘violently over-throw the government of Iran’.   Which oddly coincides with Hillary’s latest speech a few days ago in which she declares that women are the future government of the world…  Elizabeth Warren would agree.

It should not be overlooked that MEK sided with Saddam Hussein, strongly supported the Iran hostage crisis, played an active role in the downfall of the Shah of Iran, and has been viewed as treasonist. But now – according to Hillary, they are just a bunch of peaceful activists. And Amnesty bought it by aligning as their source against Assad, an organization affiliated with terrorism.  Not cool.

And while the media has run with the 13,000 figure, Amnesty admits that the number is simply a calculation based on unverifiable numbers from unverifiable sources… most of whom don’t live in Syria, and are adamantly opposed to Assad.   Sound biased?  Well it should – because it is.

Three organizations provided all the ‘witnesses’? The Syrian Network For Human Rights… The Syrian Institute For Justice and Accountability… and Urnammu For Justice and Human Rights.

The Syrian Institute for Justice lists their phone number having a prefix of +90 53 – which is registered to originate within Turkey.  Oddly, it was founded in 2011, the same as SNHR.  It has no website presence, little background, a Facebook page with very limited information, and a lot of radicalization.

Urnammu For Justice and Human Rights would appear to have no social or web appearance at all…

Given these are the primary ‘sources’, I’d say they were pretty lame and hardly reputable.

In the report, citations routinely include Amnesty itself and Human Rghts Watch (the Open Society Soros organization).  In the real world, such citations would never be considered authoritative.

This isn’t the first time Amnesty International has been called out for questionable reporting:

In 1990, Amnesty reported on the dramatic testimony of a Kuwaiti girl making claims that hospitals were leaving babies on the floor to die! Upon further investigation it was found that the story was a Washington PR contrivance and the girl was actually the Kuwaiti ambassador’s daughter. Her testimony led to the Gulf War.

In 2011 Amnesty paved the way for a no-fly zone in Libya and the demand for a ‘regime change’.

And in 2015, Amnesty cited The Institute for Justice and Accountability in its statement that the Syrian government was targeting civilians. It was confirmed that this organization/witness was based in Turkey which was aiding the rebels and ISIS.

While Amnesty’s report claims that over 13,000 were executed, they claim to have the names of 36, and refuse to release this list because it is private and confidential. Why? Their calculations are based solely on extrapolations of how many could have been killed on any given day based on statements from nameless sources.

Whatever the Truth may be, Amnesty has clearly demonstrated an agenda in collaboration with Soros which, as tragic as it may be, is not a viable representation of Truth. Unfortunately, it would also indicate that GCHQ works in collaboration with Open Society and Soros.

Now, Amnesty is calling for an “independent review” of their allegations by the UN Human Rights Council whose current members include; Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Iraq, Rwanda, Cuba and Egypt. Not exactly the cream of the crop on human rights…

Worse:  The UN Human Rights Council is heavily represented and governed by Soros, Human Rights Watch.

And the circle is complete.

Trump Bashing – an entitlement

While the mainstream media defend their ‘reporting of news, aka Trump bashing’ as their job, it is interesting the news they seem to have missed:

1)   Kiev continues to bomb Donetsk relentlessly leaving the country in abject shambles reminiscent of Syria.

2)   It is official that the Saudi’s have led the destruction of Yemen in their attempt to ethnically cleanse the Shia and institute a Sunni government. The US and UK are complicit in this devastation that has taken over 10,000 lives and put upwards of 3 million in displacement, aka refugee status…

3)   Mall closures are rippling through the US as more and more shoppers opt for online convenience.   Jobs and commercial real estate will suffer. And no – it isn’t ‘anyone’s fault, it is simply the evolution of online shopping.

4)   The French Presidential election is heating up with Marin Le Pen in the lead, in line with Trump approval ratings.

5)   If you haven’t followed the back story of the Australia refugee deal made by Obama, it ain’t good, and the immigrants are not ‘friendly’.

6)   Massive wildfires in Chile that are considered the worst ever in history have claimed entire cities! Russia is assisting Chilean officials to put out the fires utilizing specially fitted fire control planes.

7)   The US education system is till failing miserably despite the disproportionate funds designated compared to other countries around the world. The US ranks behind such countries as Latvia, China, Korea, Vietnam, Spain, UK, Germany, Russia, Estonia, Finland and Poland (to name just a few) coming in 36th place…

8)   Why isn’t the Pope visiting Muslim countries and asking them to respect and love Christians?

9)   Jews who hold Israeli passports are banned from travel to Muslim countries – where is the outrage, the press – the tribulation?

10) US Universities and Community Colleges now teach anti-Trump white racism as a mandatory English course.

11) Government workers now earn nearly 55% MORE than their counterparts in the private industry

12)   British Speaker making news is vocal about not allowing Trump to speak before UK Parliament despite a) Trump never said he wanted to, and b) this particular Speaker is sworn to be – nonpartisan…

13)   Hungary is reinstating alliance with Russia in defiance of Germany, refugees, and anti-control issues.

14) Chile’s economy showed the worst economic growth since 2009 – under Obama’s watch… logging in at 1.2% for 2016.

While these headlines just barely touch on the events today, they don’t even begin to reveal the business news, the mergers and acquisitions in the making, the corporate lawsuits, the medical trials coming to the US, the human rights violations that even the UN would seem to be silent to, with the exception of a demand for billions $$$$$. These are simply a bullet point of what these esteemed ‘journalists’ could be researching if they really wanted to report on the world issues that are affecting us.

But apparently, these media stories are pre-empted by Hollywood gossip, see-it naked pics, and Trump bashing…

Yeah, I guess, journalism has made their statement. They prefer to join the likes of the National Enquirer, Cosmo, and People as their mentors.  And to Hell with the “World”.

Obama to Blame … Right?

If the protests sweeping the US are “Trump’s Fault” then I guess we can blame all the protests during the Obama administration on – well, Obama!



1) Massive protests smoldered in Cairo, Tunisia, Lebanon, as well as other Middle East and North African cities resulting in multiple fatalities as a result of the “Anti-US mentality which rose to levels of pure hatred”.

Obama’s Fault …


2) An anti-Muslim Film spurned massive riots in Benghazi resulting in the brutal murder of US Ambassador and three American Special Forces men!   Reports across the world reference the ‘innocent Mulsims’ who were called to riots in protest over this disgusting ‘film’.

Obama’s Fault.  Right?

3)     Gunmen staged a raid on peacekeepers in Sinai as anti-US sentiment continued to spiral out of control.

Obama’s Fault.

4)   Protestors clash with riot police in Greece fueled by anti-Obama sentiment on his final visit.

Obama’s Fault.

5)   Hundreds rally in Alaska protesting Obama’s hypocritical stance on Arctic drilling.

Obama’s Fault.

6)   Spanish organizations planning massive protests in anticipation of Obama’s upcoming visit.

7)   A student protest at the University of Mississippi turns ugly as they are angry at Obama’s re-election.

8)   Anti-Obama protests in Argentina…

9)   Gun rights activists in Oregon protest Obama saying, ‘he is not welcome!’.

10)   Anti-Obama protests at a Phoenix High School

11)   Ferguson Riots

12)   Baltimore riots

13)   Wall Street riots

ALL on Obama’s watch.  Therefore, he created the divide and they are ALL his fault. Right? Because that is exactly what the current Liberals would have us believe regarding their actions during Trump’s campaign and time in office – RIGHT?

Every cop that was killed or injured, every firefighter, every black man or child that died during the Obama administration – did so because of Obama. His Direct Fault.  Right?

Every deed of defamation, every scandal, every middle class citizen that fell into poverty – Obama’s Fault.

Every bomb that fell on Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, Somalia, Sudan – Obama’s Fault. Every life that was lost in those wars – Obama’s fault. Every displaced refugee – Obama’s fault.

The number of refugees is so massive, it has now closing in on numbers not seen since post WWII – Obama’s Fault!   In 2008, before Obama took office, the UN reported there were 11.4 million refugees worldwide. In 2015, they reported that figure climbed to over 63 million. Obama’s Fault!

These are facts, not alternative news, they are numbers and actual events. You can pretend history didn’t happen and bury your head in the sludge, but ultimately, the maggots will force you to come up for air…and you will have to face reality.