Ukraine – A Biden, FBI & CIA Massive Corruption Explosion

Remember Burisma Holding Company?   Hunter Biden and Devin Archer (John Kerry’s adviser) were among prominent Board members/executives that miraculously appeared in the nick of time after the Yanukovich coup and gobbled up swathes of oil and gas leases liberally handed out by the new President Poroshenko.   At the time of the coup, Joe Biden was in charge of US/Ukraine ‘relations’. The supposed purpose of the annexation coup was the Obama administration wanted control of Ukraine and Yanukovich was an ally of Russia.

Burisma Holding Company, founded in 2002, had virtually nothing until the coup changed all that.  It has since expanded and rebranded itself as one of 35 companies linked as subsidiaries under the auspices of Mikola Zlochevskyi.   All of the expansion came after Biden showed up.

Remember daddy Biden lamenting that he was the poorest politician?

Burisma now holds the most independent licenses in Ukraine totaling 35 and is ‘the largest’ oil and gas lease company in Ukraine.

Biden is no longer – poor.

Burisma is registered in Cyprus, a tax haven that extends confidentiality far beyond that of Switzerland.

In February 2016, Joseph Cofer Black, the Director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center from 1999-2002, and Ambassador at Large for counter-terrorism, 2002-2004, joined Burisma’s Board of Directors.  Odd.

March 2016, Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion of loan guarantees if President Poroshenko did not fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin who was investigating corruption in Burisma Holdings; Shokin was fired on March 29, 2016.  His replacement Lutsenko, was the former leader of the bloc party of Poroshenko.  However, in 2012, Lutsenko was charged with abuse of office and forgery, and sentenced to four years in jail for embezzlement.   Originally a member of the Socialist/Communist Party of Ukraine, Lutsenko became a Poroshenko Partyman in 2014 when Chocolate King was edged in as President after the Ukrainian coup.

Meanwhile, in 2018 Zlochevskyi was being investigated for illegally issuing oil and gas licenses to the companies that belonged to him in 2010-2012 while he was Ecology Minister under Yanukovich.  Oops.

Poroshenko called for his recusal, utilizing Lutsenko as the newly endowed Prosecutor General after Shokin was fired for investigating Burisma Holding Company. And surprise!   After an ‘investigation’ it was concluded that no charges were found plausible against Burisma.

Meanwhile, Soros decided this was a good time to open a new NGO in the US that identified ‘corruption in Ukraine – Anticorruption Action Center, or AntAC.   AntAC is supported by – Poroshenko.

April 21, the final round for the 2019 Ukraine presidential election will occur with a comedian, Volodymre Zelenskyi leading definitively against Poroshenko. The ‘non-political’ Soros created NGO, AntAC is desperately trying to demonize Zelenskyi while glorifying Poroshenko.   And apparently, it isn’t working, Zelenskyi is leading by more than 15%. Still, headlines on AntAC claim that the US worshipped Zelenskyi as a hero for going to prison while fighting the demons of Russia.

Why don’t the voters like Poroshenko? He has tanked the economy, he has done nothing of value, unemployment is rampant, bombings, corruption, fraud, – you name it. He is worthless. The male Hillary.

Meanwhile; Joseph Black the newly appointed Board member of Burisma, was once Vice Chairman at Blackwater, a mercenary company created by Erik Prince, before becoming an advisor to Mitt Romney during his campaign, before becoming the Director of Northwest Biotherapeudics, before being elected to the Board of Burisma.  Obviously, he has his hand in the putrid bile that is liquefying the web.

The wicked web of the Black Widow spider has woven silk everywhere.

Meanwhile; Karen Greenaway, who worked for the FBI for 22+ years before ‘being retired’ December 2018, was one of the leading investigators of the Manafort case in Ukraine, and was a glowing supporter of – AntAc, Lutsenko – and by default – Soros, even attending Soros events. The FBI confirmed her alliance with Soros.

Michael Vachon, a spokesperson for Soros, who was questioned about the Greenaway/Manafort connection and Russian collusion, announced that Soros had funded a new group, Democracy Integrity Project – which was founded by another former FBI official, Daniel Jones, with the purpose of ‘investigating everything – Trump’.   Democracy Integrity hired – Fusion GPS.

DANG!

If you EVER felt sorry for Mueller or Comey or Rosenstein, or any of the possible hundreds involved in this massive conspiracy – don’t.   They all were more than aware of everything I have discussed.   This involves the FBI, the CIA, Biden personally, Obama, Kerry, and every low life that felt some sense of aspiration or greed to belie every law of the US and the Constitution.

When Trump says this is massively bigger than the Nixon Watergate fiasco – he is understating!   This is – Everything.  And this is JUST – Ukraine.

Shitake Mushroom.

Illegal Immigrants and Sanctuary Cities – The Hypocritical Oath

The proposal to release illegal immigrants from detention centers at the border into sanctuary cities is making the Democrats crazy!   Why?   Because they don’t want the immigrants in their cities, they just want everyone to think they do because it is political posturing. Whether Trump releases them in the cities or not was likely not the point, the reaction is likely the point.  All one need do is watch Sarah Sanders smile!  Every Democrat has vocally disputed the idea claiming such an action would put people at risk… And therein they have cremated their entire agenda that illegals present – no risk.

More often than not Trump has taken the position of taunting the media and Democrats into revealing their faces without makeup.  And the sight ain’t pretty.

There are currently 560 sanctuary cities across the US.   California is the only state that has legislation establishing statewide sanction. The concept of sanctuary is stating that all immigrants including undocumented and illegal – are welcome.   The caveat?  Unless they are imported by Trump.   Same people, different outcome.  These cities have also refused to cooperate with ICE for the purposes of detention and deportation.

Various studies have shown that sanctuary cities actually lower crime rate when taking in illegal immigrants. These studies were conducted by three journals: Urban Affairs Review, Justice Quarterly and Center For American Progress. Justice Quarterly has an ‘impact factor’ of 3 which means it has little to no relative value in the academic world.   For comparison, in 2014, an average rating was 41. Urban Affairs has an ‘impact factor’ of 1.8, is owned by Sage Publications which was embroiled in controversy for publishing a completely hoaxed article.   And the Center For American Progress? It is John Podesta’s ‘think tank’, run by a former aide to Obama and Hillary.  Say no more…

Of course if these studies are true, then Sanctuary cities would be desperate for more illegal immigrants so as to lower all crime throughout their city.   But the bluff was called and suddenly the wolves find themselves acting like sheep.

What are some of the actual statistics? San Francisco has a violent crime rate 59% higher than the California average, and 87% higher than the national average. Property crime is 147% higher than the state average and 161% higher than the national average.   The cities with the largest population of unauthorized migrants include: Seattle, Boston, LA, New York City, Atlanta, and Philadelphia.   All of which have relatively high crime rates.   Does this correspond to illegal status? There is no definable report that can say either yes or no.

Part of the statistical issue is that illegals are not convicted of a crime because they are deported. Therefore the statistics are skewed and can not accurately detail a comparison.

During Obama’s presidency, he deported 2.9 million illegal immigrants. Bush – 2 million.

The two largest gangs in Central America are MS-13 and Barrio-18.   They come from the Northern Triangle which includes Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador and are said to have the highest murder rate in the world!   It is estimated that upwards of 50,000 Barrio-18 members ‘relocated’ to the US, and about 10,000 MS-13 members. In 2007 it was estimated that there were roughly 800,000 gang members across the US. By 2011, that number had increased to 1.4 million.   Despite their relative statistical numbers, as of 2011 gangs accounted for 13% of all homicides and 50% of all shootings in NYC. In an effort to not profile, given the statistics showed race and ethnicity, many states have since purged all data related to gangs.  Hence today, getting actual information is impossible.  In addition, cities, including LA, have been cited for ‘under-reporting’ of crime in order to reflect a better statistic.  Despite the ‘under-reporting’, gang related crimes increased 63% and then 33% between 2014 and 2016.  Somewhat like – Germany.

It is estimated that 60% of all gang members are illegal immigrants – protected from ICE by Sanctuary cities.

LA, Orange County and Santa Clara County have the highest rate of releasing gang members from possible ICE detention. Five counties in California have the highest number of illegal immigrants, LA, San Jose (Santa Clara County), Riverside, San Diego and San Francisco. They account for roughly 25% of the entire illegal population in the US.

If you are a Sanctuary city, your agenda is to welcome all – therefore to suddenly state that ‘Trump’s proposal’ is fear mongering is stating that illegals are something to fear, not welcome, given the gang statistics and crime rates. Still, the hypocrisy is lost somewhere along the Porky Pig stutter.

The UK provides sanctuary to asylum seekers and per national policy disperses the immigrants to different towns and cities so as to not create a burden to a handful of cities. Essentially, this is the same proposal Trump has asserted.

Of course the obvious terminology that sanctuary cities don’t seem to recognize is ‘illegal’.   As in breaking the Law. By advocating breaking the law, it begs for a discussion as to what other laws are breakable without consequence?

And that’s when Porky Pig makes another entry.

TRUMP’S TAXES & FINANCES -A Democrat Nightmare

Maxine Waters is taking her new appointment as Chair of the House Intelligence and Financial Services Committee by issuing subpoena’s against Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup. The reasoning? Trump used these banks to launder Russian money… The basis for the charge is that Trump did business with the banks and repaid most of his loans.  But Deutsche Bank has been hit several times with money laundering fines, and given that Trump has done business with this bank means he is guilty by association…  

Not.

Trump’s finances have become the new plume for the Democrats having lost their two year battle in the Mueller Russia investigation. With demands that Trump release his tax returns, to demands that banks provide an entire history of Trump’s dealings, the pillage continues. At taxpayer expense.

Don’t any of these Congressional officials have a real job?

The very person making the demand for Trump to release his tax returns, Richard Neal of the House Ways and Means Committee, has failed to provide his despite numerous demands.   In fact 90% of Democrats have failed to provide their tax returns.

Does Congress have the power and authority to demand to see Trump’s tax returns?

While the release is considered ‘standard’ and a ‘tradition’, it has never been cited as law.   IRS Section 6103 does not state that any tax return requested by the House must be released. However, based on an obscure law enacted in 1924, that has never been exercised in this manner, or with this objective there is a back door. The law also states that the Treasury can nullify the law if given 30 days notice. Mnunchin states that the request is ‘politically motivated’ and thus the objective is not legal. Constitutionally, the House has to show a ‘need’ in order to make the claim. So Neal and his cohorts concocted a fake agenda wherein they claim to be auditing the IRS’s auditing procedures when it relates to a sitting President.

It is obviously a fake request, and is obviously politically motivated.  As such the law will likely be repealed.

The argument the Democrats are using is the Russia collusion theory. The fact that this entire agenda was already declared null by the Mueller investigation would seem credible enough for a Supreme Court ruling in favor of Trump.   At some point harassment would become a possible legal backlash.

While the 1924 law also states that in this demand viewing Trump’s taxes would have to take place in a closed executive session, never to be made public, Trump could easily argue that Congress is a ‘leak magnet’, and his right to privacy would be violated.

Legal experts all have differing views on the situation and the outcome, but it is likely Trump will let it go to court. In the meantime, Trump will do what Congress is NOT doing, his job.

US Healthcare – vs Health Insurance

An interesting query/comment was put before me today that sparked the need for a blog – Healthcare vs Health Insurance – as a mandate. How could a basic coverage plan work and still be fair?  

  1. Basic coverage would exclude prescriptions, cosmetic procedures, dental, vision, and ambulance services. Long term care would also not be covered.
  2. Individuals making less than a specified amount, lets say $50,000 per year, would pay into the system a percentage of their gross income. All others would pay a progressive flat fee with a cap. Tiers for family’s would be progressive up to a maximum of two children per couple. All couple’s with more than two children would pay a flat fee for each successive child.
  3. Insurance company’s would no longer be the middleman unless someone wanted supplemental insurance coverage through an independent private insurance company.
  4. In order to access coverage an insurance card would be issued to each individual including children, with a picture updated annually.
  5. Medicaid and all forms within that conversation would be eliminated.
  6. Servicemen would be covered with the military picking up the cost 100% for any member earning below a threshold – say $50,000.
  7. The VA would be eliminated.
  8. Congress would NOT vote on the proposal, instead a vote would be made by all legal taxpayers, their status verified via a comparable analysis of Social Security numbers within the IRS computer system.
  9. In order to make this work over the long haul, the entire government pension system would be – eliminated. This would be voted on by taxpayers, not Congress.
  10. The government would fix the value of services.
  11. The cost of prescription drugs would be tied to a global mean amount so that US citizens are no longer subsidizing the world’s cost.
  12. Medicare would remain intact.

Currently, the federal government spends $1.1 trillion for healthcare, $583 billion for Medicare over receipts, and $430 billion for all other healthcare. Individuals cough up an additional $2.4 trillion per year. Of course this includes the average annual expenditure of Hollywoodites requiring $500k of plastic surgery per year, so the number has some skew room.

It is estimated that the US spends about $12,000 per year for each person on healthcare. That is double the next developed countries output.   That would indicate that the US spending could be cut in half from $3.5 trillion to $1.75 trillion which includes ‘Hollywood excesses’.

However, simple averages in healthcare spending do not necessarily reflect true cost:

According to Kaiser, “In 2016, 5% of the population accounted for half of all health spending. The 5% of people who spend the most on health care spend an average of around $50,000 annually; people in the top 1% have average spending of over $109,750. At the other end of the spectrum, the 50% of the population with the lowest spending accounted for only 3% of all total health spending; the average spending for this group was $276.”

Even when comparing spending for people over the age of 65, 10% of that population accounted for 50% of the spending. People with a prior diagnosis of a disease spend upwards of 300% more than those currently diagnosed. And spending costs for those over the age of 65 is 2-3 times greater than those aged 35-45.

Between 2010 and 2016, Health insurers saw an increase in revenue from Medicare and Medicaid surging from $92.5 to $213 billion – an increase of 77% with the advent of Obamacare.   That income is mostly generated by taxing taxpayers to pay for the splurging costs incurred by those who have no wage, illegals, and/or welfare recipients.

As of 2017, the top six executives at United Healthcare raked in $1.75 billion in compensation.

In 2017, the US national gross income was roughly $19.6 trillion. From a simplistic standpoint, even an 8% tax levy on all gross income would pay for the entire healthcare costs assuming the above reductions in cost put the total annual cost on par with developed countries. If Trump’s tax overhaul were to bring back to the US income that is currently untaxable in foreign off-shore accounts, the flat percentage would be even lower.

How did Health Insurance even arrive in the US?

The brainchild result of FDR’s policies, insurance was invoked because FDR levied price and wage controls that stagnated capitalism in the employment industry.   In order to provide a benefit that another employer did not, so as to encourage a higher tiered worker, companies opened Pandora’s Box for the Insurance scheme.

Founded in 1929, Blue Cross and Blue Shield was the brainchild of Democrat Justin Ford Kimball.   As VP of health care facilities in Dallas Texas, the recipients were teachers who were guaranteed 21 days of hospital care per year for $6.   The tax exempt status of Blue Cross helped achieve increased costs.   At the time, it is estimated that the above average wage earner spent roughly 2%-3% of their income on healthcare.   Most people utilized friends, neighbors, midwives, Indian medicine, herbal cures, etc…

Eliminating the Middleman is key to lowering healthcare costs.   Obamacare did the opposite, it made more money for the Insurance Industry while enslaving the worker and businesses to an ever burgeoning cost that is now double any other industrialized country in the world.

Double. Let that sink in.

Simply rolling back Obamacare will NOT have the reduced cost effect that is necessary to bring the healthcare of the US to par.   And while this is not Medicare for all, or Universal coverage, it is an elimination of a middleman that has profited serendipitously at the expense of you and I.

My annual percentage is now over 20% of gross income.

Climate Refugee’s – The New Agenda

Germany’s Socialist Deutsche Welle news outlet has found a way to combine the plight of immigration with the plight of Climate Change – “Climate Refugee’s”.   Citing Central America as being in the midst of a unprecedented drought, DW uses this to vilify Trump as he supports building a Wall thereby exacerbating the immigration plight of the Climate Refugees.

The Central America Dry Corridor has existed for hundreds of years. Not unlike California, it is vulnerable to the climate implications of El Nino and la Nina. These forces produce years of flooding and years of drought. Like California, the countries most vulnerable have done absolutely nothing to mitigate these weather troughs and thus agriculture is severely impacted.   It is estimated that upwards of a million people are affected by the instability of this corridor.

In 2015, the UN signed massive agreements on behalf of Central America to support ‘resilience’ as a result of the negative climate impacts. “Sustainable Goals” were launched under the Paris Accord. And by 2016 a Commission was created and an ‘agenda’ was developed.   By the end of 2016, the UN had held high level meetings and a proposal was put forth to spend $80 million to mitigate the climate effects.

By the end of 2017 another committee was created which formally announced that an agenda did exist and that indeed the Dry Corridor was vulnerable…

Still, nothing was actually done.

Today, the World Bank has created a five year program in Honduras that will ‘build resilience for 6,000 people who are extremely poor’.   The program aims to teach these people ‘food security, irrigation, fertilization and healthy diets’ thereby increasing their income and lifting them out of poverty.

Houston – we have a problem…  THREE years of doing nothing is exactly why the Paris Accord is a catastrophe.

Radical climate fluctuations resulting from traditional events such as El Nino create radical climate events, ie flooding and drought. To mitigate and preserve agriculture would entail capturing the water in reservoirs during periods of flooding, and having those reserves piped to agriculture land in periods of drought.   No amount of healthy diet training and fertilization is going to help when the land is ravaged by water or desert.

A program to lift .6% of the population that has been designated as extremely poor into agriculture sustainability through healthy diet training over a period of five years – is NOT a solution in any sense of the word.

The US gives Honduras roughly $70 million in aid each year for the purpose of Humanitarian and Development assistance and Military assistance.   Of the total aid, 11% is designated for military assistance, and 89% for Economic development.  This would be taxpayer $$$$.

In the EU, five countries stand out as pledging the most to the ODA, Official Development Assistance organization, which is tasked with promoting economic development in developing countries.   Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg, Denmark and The Netherlands lead the EU in dedicating money to assist developing economies become more gender equal.   Apparently, Women Empowerment is thought to be critical to agriculture sustainability development. The remaining 10 countries that pledged money – apparently never actually coughed it all up including two noteworthy countries: Germany and France.

While no one argues against gender equality, the fact that Economic Development is now defined as gender equality for the purposes of economic aid – is perhaps why these countries remain economically undeveloped.   It explains why their agriculture is devastated year after year, it explains why their countries remain poor, and why aid does absolutely nothing to lift them out of poverty. They are not building reservoirs, dams, irrigation systems, pipelines, etc… to capture and preserve water, instead they are being told what constitutes a healthy diet, and given classes in gender equality training.

So despite the fact that infinite amounts of millions have been given to these countries within the Dry Corridor, nothing has been done to alleviate the problem by these dedicated numerous charities in association with the UN.  And instead, the UN and the EU defacto Germany have decried that the Border Wall, aka Trump, is to blame for all the ails that have persisted for decades.

In essence the EU and UN are simply looking for a way to align Climate Change money with Women Empowerment by teaching what constitutes a healthy diet to countries that have no food, and sell them fertilizers in the process.   Ah.

Personally I find this to be fake news, propaganda, disinformation, and hate speech toward our President.   All of which are punishable offenses requiring fines, censorship, and jail time according to German Law.

Close The Mexican Border?

While many are laughing, hardiharhar, about the loss of avocado’s in the US should we close the US/Mexican border, the much larger component is actually “Auto Parts”.

Mexico is the largest source and recipient of US auto parts, accounting for roughly 1/3 of all US import parts, and export parts.   Should the US choose to close the border, those parts would then need to be contracted through Canada and China.  While it is possible, the downtime until the new contracts could be filled could be devastating to the auto industry.   The value of the trade parts?   $83 billion!    By comparison, the combined total value of China and Canada’s share is roughly $67.5 billion.

And therein lies the real rub.

While the US is negligent to report on the Mexican business opinion regarding the exploitation of our border, estimates reveal that businesses are losing upwards of $800 million per day due to border crossing delays.

And those businesses are fervently pressuring the Mexican President to cut a deal with Trump.

But Mexico’ woes are not only relegated to a failing agreement over illegal crossings, they are overwhelmed by cartels, drug lords, a failing/falling tourism industry, blockades, caravan costs, unemployment, and rising crime.   And yet, amidst all this decline, in order to attract police who fear hourly for their assassination, the government is providing them with Mustangs, Corvettes and Cadillacs.

Really.

Refurbished cartel confiscations, instead of putting the vehicles up for auction as they do in the US, Mexico simply repaints them and uses them for police.  Brilliant!

It is not unlike the notion thrown about in the blogosphere that the US use el Chapo’s money to fund the wall.

According to the UK’s Independent, Trump just doesn’t understand ‘Trade’.   But of course the writer, Carli Pierson, does.   A NY lawyer who resides in Mexico, and self professed adherent of Islamic Studies, Ms Pierson writes that Trump’s policies highlight his lack of humanitarianism and declares that most of the migrants are attempting to cross legally…   What????

When did Trump take office? How many migrants were turned away before Trump?

Here is an interesting statistic:  The number of migrants apprehended by border patrol agents per year peaked during – the Clinton Administration.   Based on current numbers the apprehensions were 19times greater during Clinton’s regime, and 58% higher during Obama’s.   This coincides with the incredible hike in deportations that began in the early 1990’s and has peaked each year since.  It is a crisis that has been perpetuated and is now being supplanted by NGO’s, Catholic churches, and corrupt governments.

While the heartstrings would have us believe that children are the mainstay of illegals, it should be noted that a)  children are the source of the sex trade hosted by the worst of the worst,  b)   as with the EU, a 47 year old ‘child refugee’ was recently identified via medical examination,   c)  the immigrants are no longer from Central America, they are from a host of Middle eastern and Asian countries. Meaning someone has to sponsor their travel…

Who could possibly be providing them with plane fare, boat fare, food, clothing, prepaid cellphones, and housing?   Of course it is a rhetorical question.   And the Red Cross, Oxfam, Catholic Diocese, the Vatican, and Open Society Foundation are the largess proponents of this design.

The very non-independent Independent UK discusses how Trump demonizes asylum seekers amid claims of racism….  But the claims somehow ignore the fact that Obama’s stats were far greater…  a black man.   It also fails to address the numerous presidents who made lavish claims against immigration for the last 50+ years.   So how is it that Trump is suddenly the causal factor after two years?

Because he is a threat to the Cabal and Swamp.  And he is winning.

End of discussion.

The final pronouncement of the Mueller Investigation has derailed what was seen as a fait accompli!  And The Art Of War has obviously been ignored and/or renounced:   “Never underestimate your opponent”.

Trump is working diligently For The People.   The Cabal is working diligently For The Cabal.  Those within the Cabal are wealthy elite, who desire a radical depopulation agenda, so as to gird the population into a workable corral wherein the sheep can be herded by Llama’s, wolves, and camels.  

If that is your desire and life for your children – hey that’s your opinion.  It just isn’t mine.

BREXIT – UK Media Morality Police – Oxfam: A Linked Cabal Conspiracy 101

Under Sharia Law, morality police are tasked with enforcing religious obeyance, dress code enforcement, and the promotion of virtue.   Punishment varies by country and can range from public admonishment to jail time and torture.  

Facebook’s Zuckerberg is prowling the globe demanding morality policing of all social media platforms.  Under the UK government Department of Digital Culture of Media and Sport, the UK is the newest country to adopt censorship propaganda on behalf of the Cabal media.   The new White Paper outlines specific ‘codes of practice’ including child sex, revenge porn, sale of illegal goods and terrorist content.  But it is the ambiguous territory that is alarming:  harassment, hate crimes, trolling, fake news and disinformation.

And then there is this: “blocking harmful websites”.

What is Disinformation?  “False information spread to deliberately deceive”.   It originated in Russia and was coined by Joseph Stalin to reference – “manipulation of a nation’s intelligence system through the injection of credible, but misleading data”.

Interestingly, this campaign of ‘disinformation’ that was initially levied against Trump and Russia has now massively backfired putting a healthy number of Democrats and intelligence officials at risk of prosecution, according to Attorney General Barr.   While some pundits within the media consider the betrayal to have been perpetrated by a relatively small group of people, that statement is misleading and likely quite false.   In fact, it had to involve key intelligence agencies within the US government.

How quickly we forget:  In 2016 and 2017, a coordinated report put out by the major news outlets stated that 17 intelligence agencies confirmed the Russia collusion was real.   This statement was later corrected by two media outlets who stated that in fact it was only the FBI, NSA and CIA.   But if they confirmed as fact something that has since been proven to be wrong – the media and intelligence offices were spreading “Disinformation” and Propaganda.  Which should be censored according to Zuckerberg.  And the UK.

The total budget for these three agencies is roughly $33 billion, and the number of employees is around 65,000.  The Obamas and Clintons also quoted the false 17 number.  But the fact remains, these three agencies are the most prominent within the government and thus should be held to a higher accounting for their statements and spreading propaganda.

While Facebook has hired it’s own media morality police, the UK is considering two possibilities; some unknown unbiased watchdog, or Oxfam.  While finding an unbiased watchdog likely means a neoliberal Soros protégé, Oxfam is hardly above reproach.

Oxfam is a multinational NGO with a hefty log of criticisms with regard to its operations, political activity, charitable transparency, engorged executive salaries, and sexual misconduct allegations.   In 2011, Oxfam was accused of “being unduly influenced by the priorities of the media, of providing inaccurate information to the press (“stories featuring aid projects which often rely on dubious numbers provided by the organizations”) and of perpetuating negative stereotypes which “have the potential to influence policy”.

In January 2013, Oxfam was nominated for the Charity of the Year award at the British Muslim Awards. They didn’t win.  The British Muslim Awards is an annual award ceremony that honours the success and achievements of Britain’s Muslim individuals, groups and businesses, as in – Oxfam.

As usual, the Oxfam morality police considered by the UK are immoral, unethical, biased, prejudiced and have been accused of fulfilling one singular charitable need – its own existence.

Whether compared to the Sharia morality police or to Communist style censorship, the UK decision has been made as the news is flogged with BREXIT and other topics find no headline.  Perhaps I should qualify and rephrase, FAKEBREXIT.

The BREXIT that is and was and shall never be.

In a bold shift, Theresa May has pushed the delay until the end of the year while publically stating she will not resign until a deal is in place.    The announcement is in complete contradiction to her previous calls for a June deadline and her summer resignation.   The shift comes on the heels of meetings with both Merkel and Macron who are defacto spokespeople for the Socialist/Marxist Jean Claude Juncker and the UN.

The obvious collusion is likely further pressure from a Germany whose economic prosperity has taken a significant hit in the last two years.   The same Germany that has held the reins and implemented extensive Socialist/Marxist policies.   The same Germany that will be required to pick up the significant $$$$ slack that the UK exit would entail.   The same Germany that has systematically denied every single deal presented.

Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party is demanding an EU Union that is essentially a non-BREXIT and the Tories seem to think that keeping May alive in Parliament through the year will jeopardize their upcoming re-elections.  No one seems intent on making BREXIT – instead it has degraded to a political fist fight worthy of the Poroshenko government in Ukraine with brawls, screaming, fist fights, and aggressively foul language.

The alignment of the delay to coincide with the 2020 elections in the US is likely not coincidental.   Whether the UK structures shift further right or further left is the real stall point.  Given Theresa May’s rather left leaning conservatism, her resignation would open the door to more staunchly right aligned politicians and their ideologies, not to mention a clean BREXIT that could erode Labour and Socialism.

Whether it is BREXIT or morality police, the UK has crawled ever further into the black web of the cabal who are desperately trying to revive a failing cult club.  Censorship via Oxfam is so incredibly perverse, it highlights the degradation that the left, May, Merkel, Maurice le-Macaroon, and Juncker feverishly drool for as they exit left holding their Panama Paper tax haven certificates.

FYI:  Oxfam is one of the NGO’s aiding the migrant caravans targeting the US/Mexican border.   They have been vocal in demanding human rights protection for all migrants.  They have provided financial assistance to the migrants.  They have designated funds to support migrant rights organizations.  Oxfam is just one, albeit vastly powerful and highly funded, organization that partners with the Soros Open Society Foundation to create chaos in the US through massive “ILLEGAL”  immigration.

BREXIT: Theresa May Sold The UK

The Theresa May BREXITS are toast, have been toast, and will be forever toast, because that was ‘ordained’.  BREXIT will be undermined whether by internal chaos, or external manipulation, the UK is going down.  That was the – Agenda.

And Theresa May agreed.

It is an interesting question, ‘what would be so heinous as to scare you to dissolve your entire Country?’ That you would sacrifice scores, and possibly entire freedom, because of an existential threat.

And that threat would be very personal.

It would seem, Theresa May took the threat, and agreed to destroy her Country.

Merkel, May and countless others, agreed to sacrifice their country for the sake of their sanctification. Which means they have to believe in their twisted minds that either, a) they will go to heaven for saving those who were threatened to be assassinated,  or  b) neither women having children is pertinent.  Or c) they are aliens from he Axwar Galaxy and have no emotion… just KIDDING!  Grow one!

It is too convenient that both Merkel and May have made it known that they will resign before the end of their term, and abdicate – essentially.

Not exactly the best fodder for a ‘legacy’.  And legacy is prominent in the game of ‘Power’.

But that power is faltering, failing, their glow is graying.

The deal was inked the moment the UK voted for BREXIT.  Destroying it internally is always preferable.  But that didn’t fit the – Agenda.  And so numerous polls were conducted that all revealed that the majority of the UK populace had ‘changed their minds’.   Therefore, a second vote would be mandated because obviously the consensus had changed – radically.

At what point would you cave?  What would it take?

To save a child?   A spouse?   A mother?   At what point would you sell your entire country for a threat?  I can’t answer.   I can’t imagine.

But I would hope it would be significant.  Worth it.

Perhaps my idealism is surfacing, but I would think that an inherent good does exist and would take control.   Although, given the insight into our dark side, it is not without possibility to expect nothing but the very worst one can imagine.   So it is ‘difficult’ to hold to hope.  But I do persist!

The UK most certainly stands at a precipice.  Historically, that may redefine, but for now, it is a symbolically huge sentiment.  If the UK pulls out, the likelihood of the countries on the fence, Hungary, Italy, Croatia, Czech republic, etc…, would follow suit.  Ultimately, the collapse of the EU as a conjoined entity would fail.  An economic spiral would be likely to ensue.   Think Venezuela.

And in its most dire of economic devastation, a hero would step in to save the country and all it’s people.  Only the ‘hero’ might actually be the wolf.   But the sheep have no clue.   They have been taught, indoctrinated into doing and believing whatever they are told…

And the dare ya statement would be then – to what extent has this propaganda been fueled and created?  What can we hold as truth?

NO one seriously doubts the corruption of Theresa May in this BREXFAIL.  But she didn’t create this, it was a very militaristic coordination that required intense planning and alliance.

“The EU will demand a heavy price from Theresa May for her failed BREXIT negotiations…”

  1. Theresa May will – pay nothing.But the UK Taxpayers certainly – will.
  2. b) The guardian of the gates EU always planned to nay anything Theresa May. That was their sole directive.
  3. c) Theresa May is obviously being blackmailed by some source for ‘something’. Enough so that she would sell her entire country.  Hopefully that something is worth – a country.

Socialism: The US Military – Lesson 101

The ‘darling’ Socialists are quick to bring to light the US government agencies that they deem to be ‘socialist’ in order to defend Socialism as a defacto solution to all that ails the US.   “The Military is Socialist”.   Really?  

It would appear that few are learned in the definition of Socialism:

“The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.”

If you don’t like that one, here are three more:

  1. any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
  2. a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
  3. a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The common denominator of these definitions?  Goods. Property.   Production.   Ownership.

The Military does not provide goods.  Does not designate property.  Does not produce goods.  The Military is a volunteer organization in which they members agree to perform services for a wage.  Within that ‘voluntary service’ they are provided certain benefits to add to their wage base.   And if they do not perform according to the designated rules they may be fired.  Granted, the Military is required to have guns and jets and bombs as an adjunct product of their service.   But it is a product of their service – not a luxury.   Cars, houses, clothes, food, toys, etc.. are luxuries produced on our behalf.  Those are the ‘goods’ referred to in the definition of Socialism.  That is the basis of ‘economy’.

In a Socialist ‘economy’ those luxuries disappear.   Shortages become the norm.   In the 1980’s when Poland was governed into Socialism, the waiting period to buy a car was 7 years.  But you were required to advance that cost and wait.  The waiting period to lease an apartment was 5-7 years, but you were required to advance the rent.   Supermarket shelves were empty save for endless bottles of ‘vinegar’.

In Venezuela, they no longer have drinking water.

That – is – Socialism.

The fact that ‘taxpayers’ are charged for that Military wage is a benefit to taxpayers and has existed since the beginning of militaries.   When the Socialists within the US, Gabbard, O’Casio, Sanders, Beto, Warren, etc… reference their embrace of Socialism, they refer to a different definition and are simply attempting to muddle the truth.  Yes the government operates .  It exists.  It is funded by taxpayers for the express purpose of performing duties and overseeing various organizations including the military, including our public school system, our public universities, our police and fire department.

And it is supposed to be – free from bias, free from prejudice, free from propaganda.   As a taxpayer funded enterprise.

Capitalism:  “Capitalism is an economic system based upon private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system, and competitive markets.”

The basic – the largess discrepancy between the definition ‘acquired’ by the Socialists in defending their rule is ‘economy’.

Which makes their entire defensive platform a house of cards.

They do not even understand the most basic conceptual definition of the platform they espouse. And that makes them ‘uneducated’.

The fact that the pure definitions have to be even be discussed is further evidence that the Socialist education system adopted in the US and the EU has collapsed into a dummied version of apocalyptic proportions in which history, and current events, are corrupted. The burning of books, the burning of knowledge.

The fact that these individuals would support that FIRE, is even more heinous, for it reveals the soul beneath.

It is wearying trying to educate the minds of those who have chosen to bury their heads in the sand.   It is wearying to try and regurgitate what history has already taught.  It is wearying to listen to people who have never experienced the devastations refuse to listen to those who have…

EU Colonial Reparations

With the global flap in the wind Climate Change Fund errr, flapping, the EU has found a new and improved way to prop up their financing the redistribution of wealth agenda – “Colonialism Reparations”.

Another good reason for the UK BREXIT given they could be one of the biggest EU targets…

The gist of the bill is based on EU Afrophobic attacks.  The term, Afrophobic, conjures up  unjust prejudicial and racial ideologies in line with Islamaphobia.  Except that Afrophobia is related to ‘anyone of African descent’.   Each ‘national authority’ would thus be required to provide proper “education, housing, health, criminal justice, political participation and migration”.

The reasoning behind the gem of the bill is that the EU created colonialism and slavery throughout Africa and must be held accountable.

What this bill does not seem to address is the fact that hate crimes can occur against any race or culture including Jews, Whites, Christians, women, etc…  Therefore, creating an African agenda is actually quite blatantly – racial and prejudicial.

What is the real purpose?

  1. It opens the door to possible reparations being made to African states in the form of monetary aid.  Given the fall of funding for Climate Change that was being filtered to Africa, and the need for infrastructure to support the current colonialism land grabs, Africa has lost significant $$$$.   As the cabal took control of large swathes of land in Africa for pennies per hector, pushing out the local farmers, they required infrastructure in order to market their new machinized farms.   The Paris Accord Green Fund flapped, and money dried up.  Thus, a new agenda needed to be created to address the cabal’s need to have funding provided by taxpayers instead of from their own wallets.
  2. It creates an even larger welfare budget within individual EU countries that would become the burden of viable taxpayers further spiraling the EU economy into oblivion.
  3. It demonizes nationals as being the aggressors and victimizes immigrants further suppressing the criminal activities that are decimating entire cities throughout Europe.

The EU Commission rarely operates on a level that is not embedded in an alternate agenda.  And this instance is no different than any other.  The media coverage is slim with respect to hate crimes perpetrated by immigrant Afrikaners.  Most governments, specifically Germany’s, have adopted rules for quashing anything related to immigrant crimes.  The police are forced to release perpetrators, and statistically, they are prohibited from making any arrest which could skew the crime rates.

According to Germany’s Deutsche Welle, there were 800 attacks on Muslims last year.  By contrast, the first nine months of 2018 saw 1000 attacks on Jews.  There are roughly 117,000 Jews in Germany, while there are roughly one million Afrikaners (statistics are not available because Germany does not believe in profiling – numbers are based on an estimate done in 2013 before the massive immigration).

Similarly, in France it is illegal to conduct a census that queries race or color, therefore a proper statistic that would qualify as either Islamaphobia or Afrophobic is completely and utterly impossible.  Making the EU Commission’s bill nonsensical and without a shred of basis.

In addition, given Germany doesn’t profile, the number of attacks on Afrikaners could include black on black which would not be racial at all.

The agenda is obviously far from the purported EU Commission statement.  But as we watch Merkel and the growing possibility of her early resignation, it will be interesting to see where she chooses to reside as her country falls…