Iran: It Isn’t Oil Stupid, It’s Pharmaceuticals

The Iran rhetoric has been thick.   Everyone is soliciting their highest ranking intelligence to make an accusation, citing a plethora of Scientists, Geophysicists, and Engineers to support their view.  And, of course, the diametrically opposed stories tell a different tale.

The same media, and many of the same liberals who advocated for the Iran Nuclear Deal that was imposed by Obama via Executive Order, are now calling for retribution attacks against Iran for the recent drone strike.   So what happened to the wonderful peaceful Iran that Obama and the Liberals wined and dined?

Because many of these same pundits are now calling for the annihilation of Iran…  The Democrats demand – war.

Sort of…

Tankers were hit by either land mines, missiles, or other ‘flying’ contrivances.   The tankers belong to Japan and Norway.  According to Norway there will be no retaliation and the news is already dead on arrival.  They postulate that a sophisticated ‘agent provocateur’ is responsible, but ultimately blame the attack on President Trump because he shred the Iran Nuke Deal.  Japan has stated that there will be NO retaliation, and no news sites in Japan seemingly think the instance is even worthy of an article.

Neither the press in Japan or in Norway even acknowledge the US Drone downing.  The pictures presented by Iran are actually of a drone downing in Yemen in 2017.   And yet, the US war mongers are now convinced Trump is a wimp for not decimating Iran… instigating war, and creating a new pocket of ummmm – wealth.

The Iran Nuke deal was after all designed to create a new source of wealth for the elite. Businesses were lined up, drooling at visions of sugarplums – and valuable pharmaceutical opportunities.

Obama officials, Dianne Feinstein and John Kerry have been desperately attempting to assure Iran that the Nuclear Deal is still viable and that the plans as established before Trump can be reinstated.   But Rouhani isn’t convinced.   Attacking Saudi ships, Japanese ships and Norwegian ships this year, Iran would for all intents seem ‘confused’.

What would be gained by goading and provoking Trump into a war?

By 2002, Iran had accumulated a massive internal pharmaceutical industry that increased in value by roughly 500% between 2009 and 2015.   High tech medicines including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and recombinant proteins have been the biggest leaders in the field with Germany and Russia being the primary importers.

Novo Nordisk, the 10thlargest biotech in the world based out of Denmark had contracted to manufacture insulin in Iran.   Sanofi, based in France, is the 5thlargest for prescription sales and it too was chomping at the bit with Iranian deals in the works.   Novartis, based in Switzerland, was on board as well.  Among its many subsidiaries was Syngenta, which specialized in genetically modified plants and is now owned by ChemChina.  Novartis also specializes in monoclonal antibodies, which it produces and sells ‘outside of the US’.  And in 2009, Obama awarded Novartis a $486 million contract to construct a plant in North Carolina where they would be tasked with creating 150 million vaccines in the event the administration declared a ‘pandemic’.  In 2009 when Obama took office Novartis was selling for roughly $30 per share, today it is $91.  Novo Nordisk was trading at $12.70 and is now $50.90.

Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen was being paid a monthly fee by Novartis with the agreement that Cohen would tell Trump how best to regulate the pharma industry.  Cohen is currently serving a 3 year sentence in Federal prison.

Iran was to become the ‘hub’ of the pharmaceuticals and – the investors would be granted full exemption from taxes.   In other words, Iran was to become the new tax haven for wealthy pharmaceuticals and anyone else wanting to climb aboard the bandwagon.

When Trump nixed the Iran Nuke deal, these heavy weight pharmaceuticals saw their investments crash.    John Kerry had been heavily trading pharma stocks since 2011 when he worked in the Senate Finance Committee’s Health Subcommittee, a position he used and profited from greatly.    Obviously he has a vested interest in reigniting the Iran deal as he was likely a heavy weighted investor in the Pharmaceuticals when Obama used Executive Order status to confirm the Iran Nuclear Deal.

When Kerry inherited his father’s money in 2002 it was estimated to be worth roughly $300,000 to $1.5 million.  A large spread!  By 2013, he had somehow grown that to $250 million.  Today, the estimate is $103 million…a tragic loss?  Or simply transfer of wealth to a haven?

In 2009 Dianne Feinstein’s net worth was estimated to be around $77 million.  By 2014 it had reached $99 million, today according to Forbes, she is worth $80 million.   A tragic loss…

In May 2019, one year after Trump reneged the Iran Nuke Deal, Rouhani stated that the commitments agreed to in the deal would no longer be adhered to and proliferation would edge up. Three days after the tanker attacks, Iran restated that their enrichment program would “far exceed” the restrictions by June 27.

Dianne Feinstein visited Iran in May, two weeks later the Japanese and Norwegian tankers were hit, and a US drone was downed.   Kerry had been in constant telephone conference with Iran during this same period.

Did Feinstein and Kerry order the hits?  Why?

With an oil glut that has decimated oil prices, the tanker attacks spiked oil from reaching its potential of $30 barrel to about $50 – still quite low but a good enough spike to enrich a few profitable wagers.  But oil is passé, Iran has abundant farmland only 12% of which is actually utilized. Their minerals include: chromium which is used to control weight, muscle, diabetes, heart issues, etc… Their desire is to navigate away from an oil economy and create a pharma economy.   That desire was scrubbed by Trump.

The US is now oil independent.  We don’t give a dang about the Strait of Hormuz, or   Iran’s oil.   Follow The Money.   The Money is pharma.   Germany – heavily invested.  France – boldly invested.  Russia – flagrantly invested.   US?  The Swampers, the Obamites, the Hillarites, they are all likely heavily peeved as they watch their net worth scrubbed.  Pharma?  They would likely assassinate anyone who impaired their agenda. Who they support?  Whomever is likely to give them an ‘edge’.  They have no real political affiliation – their affiliation is to – money.

How The Church Destroyed Religion

Few look at the history of our global societies.  Fewer look at the history of the church.   Reading and accepting the Bible without any knowledge of both societal and church history creates a sort of empty following.  It is similar to the times when Priests could only read the Bible in Latin because the lay people were not literate and had to blindly shuffle along.    Today we have a vast resource within the Internet and there is no excuse.

Having separated myself from what some might reference a cult church, my search into those histories brought about a multitude of questions.  But when I began to ask those questions I was told I was divisive and challenging authority.  Essentially I was banished and the members of the church were instructed to abandon me.

Why?

I am the same person now vs. then, so why would the Church suddenly find me to be not of the flock?  Why did I become a threat?

The largest nagging query was quite inadvertently conveyed to me when a friend asked me to accompany him to a Catholic Church and I hesitated being an evangelical.  His response was,  “what’s the problem, He’s the same God?”

And, of course, my friend was right.

In creating a babel of churches, in essence, the Church has destroyed religion.

Each sect or religion states that they are the only true religion and all other religions are false. Many even assert that because their nuance is the only correct translation only those who follow this nuance will be saved and go to Heaven.  Everyone else is bound for Hell.

Even though – He is the same God.

There are hundreds of translations of the Bible.  Each translation has been conveyed by mortal men.  They are called ‘Versions’.   And while each version claims to serve a  particular purpose, by definition a version is a person’s point of view.  And thus, religion was usurped by The Church as a point of view.

The Bible cannot be ‘a point of view’ it must be the Word.   But like Adam, mortal man believes he is greater than God and must insert his personal translation and liken it above all others.

Even that wasn’t enough. Words have been implanted into the Bible that didn’t even exist at the time of the writings.  The words created legalistic power in order for the Church to hold rule over Monarchs and thus all peasants.  For example:

Marriage. 

The word marriage was created sometime in 1100 AD.  And it was thus determined that the Pope must officiate all marriages in order for them to be legal.  Prior to that time, men and women had loose relationships that involved their father’s permission, a dowry, and sharing a house.  When the Bible was written, marriage by our standards didn’t even exist.  The binding of a man and woman was a commitment amidst a necessary Biblical calling to procreate.   God called on Adam and Eve to multiply and prosper.  There was no calling for them to love or marry.   Thousands of years later, Kings married to enhance their position and held formal celebrations to announce this union.  Peasants were required to attend in order to signify the union was politically good.

Over time, the Bible and Biblical teachings were altered to incorporate the new concept of marriage as created by the Catholic church.   Centuries later, a babel of evangelical churches began to develop all embracing these man-made concepts and precepts, while still holding to the premise that they, each of them, were the only true religion and all others were false.

These Babels fractured the Church as they sought to refine and redefine religion outside of its core truth.

Homosexuality:  

The term was coined in the late 1800’s and didn’t exist in the Bible until 1946.  A German psychologist, Karoly Maria Benkert, created the word while researching sexuality.

The original Greek words were arsenokoitai and malakos.   A more literal meaning of these words would describe a person participating in exploitative sex typically associated with money, and a man taking the social and sexual position of a woman, respectively.

During the many infamous journey’s of Paul, Pompeii citizens notoriously engaged in brothels, prostitution, and exploitive sex.  Some believe that the eruption of Mount Vesuvius and the subsequent destruction of Pompeii was God’s vengeance on a corrupt city.

Sexuality was far different. Incest was common.  Homosexual behavior existed as an accepted norm. There simply wasn’t the attitude and judgment that prevails today.

The Roman Emperor Nero had five spouses, three women, one man and one boy before dying at the age of 30.   His death is referenced as ‘suicide’ although several accounts claim Nero went into hiding given his entire court had stated they were going to torture and execute him.

Paul was placed in house arrest and released two years later in 62AD.   His arrest was made as a result of being accused of dissension by Jews.  Paul was ‘divisive’ because he was challenging behaviors and ideas that were the norm.   While it is not factually known, it is believed that Paul’s second imprisonment and ultimate death occurred in 68AD, the same year Nero died.  But Nero had lost control of his realm at that point so the account that Nero had Paul beheaded is quite unlikely.

Other accounts state that Paul’s death occurred ‘sometime between 62 and 67AD’.    Obviously, the historical evidence does not exist or there would not be a five year possible span of time.  In other words, we don’t know.

History surrounding Nero and Paul has been rewritten.  Versions were created hundreds of years after the fact by men who had an – agenda. Paul’s execution has little historical context.   The first account that stated that Paul was beheaded by Nero was made by Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea who lived between 275 and 339 AD, over 200 years after Paul died. Bishop Caesarea was a nontrinitarian whose beliefs today would be most closely aligned with Mormons and Jehovah Witness.

It is likely that Paul’s reference to arsenokoitai and malakoswere rebuttals against the given moral norm of the time which included;  prostitution, incest, bestiality and brothels.  While Paul further describes what is natural and unnatural according to God’s creation and command – that command was to multiply, and same sex relations does not accomplish that end.   The concern was not sexual immorality but more importantly the fact that procreation was at risk, which was God’s first command to Adam and Eve.   Man had become consumed with ‘passions’ instead of furthering the creed of growing the herd.

Leviticus is commonly referenced as the one Biblical context that prohibits a male from lying with another male.  It is said to be inspired by Moses who died in the 13thcentury BC. Written sometime between 500 and 350 BC, Leviticus is a compilation of many authors, none of whom are known.  It is believed to have been written by ‘the law of priests; as its laws relate to priests’.   It is a calling for absolute purity and holiness within the priesthood so as to establish a perfect bloodline.  The passage most often decried is;  “You shall not lie with a male, as with a woman; it is an abomination”.

But Leviticus has many other Laws:   Childbirth is considered ‘unclean’, menstruation is unclean, and a laundry list rambles on commanding a person to wear garments of a single weave, plant fields of a single seed, and instructs them to refrain from mating two different kinds of animals.   Any of the multitude of laws that are not adhered to require the immediate consequence of – death or being severed from the body of priests.    Yet, those penalties are not sanctified by The Church.   Instead, they are upheld in Islam.

So why is 18:22 the only passage the target of The Church despite every other passage being ignored?  Why has Leviticus been pronounced as applying to the common people when it was specifically written for priestly holiness?  Why do we take certain commands and say they are not applicable and others are?   Do members of the church wear garments made of one weave?  Does your garden have more than one seed?  Why is Leviticus even in the Bible if it is a memorandum to Priests?   Why is it even acknowledged at all when no one has any idea who wrote it?   And how is it that its laws and penalties are so closely aligned with Sharia Law?

Why has this one obscure passage, written by unknown men, to be applied specifically for Priests gained such weight and obsessive commentary as a societal immorality?

It is estimated that the population of the total Roman Empire declined drastically between 1 AD and 350 AD.  Wars were constant.   And without procreation there was concern that the Roman civilization might not survive.

Prostitutes routinely utilized methods of contraception and abortion.  In ancient Greece an herb, Silphium, was customarily used for these purposes.   Its use is recorded as far back as 700 BC.   Men had become consumed with their passion for other men, boys and prostitutes thereby jeopardizing their duty to have children.

So why did the Church ultimately focus their wrath on homosexuality in the 1950’s and their power over marriage in the 12thcentury?

It is believed that the best way to corral the sheep is through the creation of a common enemy.  The Church is no different than our political class.    Power, control, wealth, prosperity, these goals authored what was and is The Church and redefined religion.   In so doing, they have essentially corrupted ‘religion’, they have plagiarized, rewritten history, omit history, and wholly attempted to indoctrinate masses.   And in the Babel, Christ is lost, God is lost, and deception is the Holy meme.

I may Stand by Religion… But I cannot stand by The Church.

Russia Stole The EU ELECTIONS?

The EU is claiming that Russian friendly social media accounts targeted the EU elections to suppress voter turnout and influence voter preferences by making such grandiose claims as:   1) a decline of western and Christian values in the EU, 2) statements that the corruption scandal that brought down the nationalist party in Austria was the work of Spain and Germany, 3)   highlighting the irrelevance of the European Parliaments powers, and, 4)   unfounded attacks on the EU.

They go on to announce that voter turnout reached a 25 year high.  Odd…

The author(s) of ‘the report’ are never mentioned. But somehow all of the egregious social media statements were considered ‘fake’.   Oddly, that would make me a Russian Bot.   And I am most certainly not.

The social media cited as the sources include; Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, all of which have in place extensive anti-conservative analytics.   Twitter and YouTube have been the latest to suppress any and conservative accounts from gaining any attention, sometimes deleting Tweets without the author even knowing.

The report claims that countries that supported the AfD were particularly targeted by Russian Bots and Trolls given those countries experienced significant gains in nationalist candidates; such as France, Poland and Italy.

But Facebook had already banned all accounts in the EU that it deemed were politically right of center a month before the elections…  Oops.

In other words, if a country actually supports a candidate that is not socialist, that means the people of that country were brainwashed. The NYTimes calls it a DNC Russia hack.

And while gains were made for nationalist and conservative parties, the socialists still control 441 seats out of 701 total, and the communists control 41 seats.  Progress, but not an infiltration.

Jean Claude Juncker, the President of the EU Commission, earns a whopping salary of $36,184 per month = $434,208 annually – not including his insider trade deals. While the PM of Luxembourg, Juncker managed to make his country one of the largest tax havens in the EU, including the pharmaceutical, Glaxo-Smith-Klein, Amazon, and Vodafone. The Luxembourg haven is estimated to be worth over 3-5 trillion Euros. Not bad for a Socialist mentality. And it could be the reason the Socialists continue to claim – this ideology works.

All of this is conjoined under a single term: disinformation. False information intended to mislead and propagandize.

Within that definition such information would include; the Steele/Trump Dossier, New York Times, Washington Post, the DNC, BBC, DW, CNN, CIA, MI5, Google, NBC, Politico, and just about every media outlet on the planet. Because technically, everyone is postulating their opinion –

So why would Russia’s particular ‘disinformation’ be classified differently?

Since 2000, the US has characterized Russia as Authoritarian.   What does that mean?

  1. Limited political pluralism realized with legalistic constraints on the legislaturepolitical parties, and interest groups;
  2. Political legitimacy based upon appeals to emotion, and identification of the regime as a necessary evil to combat enemies of the people, socio-economic underdevelopment, and guerrilla insurgency;
  3. Minimal social mobilization consequent to legalistic constraints, such as political suppression of all anti-regime activities;
  4. Informally defined executive powers, which extend and allow government authority into every sphere of life

These are the core ideologies of the Socialist and Democrat parties across the Globe. Censorship being the most pervasive as all things social media are determined to be ‘disinformation’ if they do not align with the regime of the EU and the Liberals. The Liberal Regime then instates itself as the savior of the people from which all things ‘enemy’.  This would include those who do not align with their respective ideals. And lastly, legalistic constraints are imposed by a slew of NGO’s bent on finding all things a bastion of oppression on – one.

Utilizing the now defunct Soviet Union as an example of authoritarianism, what is not voiced in this historical reference is the fact that the Fall actually occurred with the Russian Revolution wherein the Communist Bolsheviks murdered the monarchy, and therein sustained massive assassinations, murders, and genocide under the tutelage of Marxist Socialism. The same Socialism advocated by the EU, Juncker, and the Liberal parties across the globe today.

Leaders that we have been taught to immortalize, to deify, fall within this advocacy including; Nelson Mandela, Ban Ki Moon, Pope Francis, etc…   That is the true propagandizing, the true ‘disinformation’ that has engulfed our schools, our universities, and our media because the Liberal/Socialist politicians who are the pocket-tools of Banks and Pharma are told what to do, what to say, who to like, and where to spit.

There are a few super-heroes working for The People, Sarah Sanders was a true warrior.

History can be burnt. Truth can be redefined.   But it is undeniable that WWII would never have been won without the aid and massive losses of the Soviet Union.   WWI would never have been won, without the Soviet Union.   I do not purport to support Soviet Russia, any more than I would purport to support Nazi’s, because in essence the Soviets were vying for their own freedom from the suppression brought on by the Socialist/Marxist Bolsheviks that have now become US enemy #1.

Know your history.   Study it well.   The Jesuits.   The Bolsheviks. The Christians who converted to Judaism in order to be money lenders… Don’t be afraid.

Presidential Executive Orders

As elections loom for 2020, Democrats are going to have to answer for their accomplishments since taking over the House majority.   Fixated on Trump demonizing, they have failed to actually do much of anything of importance.   While Congress typically averages the passage of 758 bills per session, a total of eighteen bills have been passed this year, including:

1)   Seven extensions of previous bills

2)   Two bills to further budget appropriations

3)   One bill to recognize a ‘reference’ as a bill

4)   A bill to clarify the pay of VA podiatrists

5)   A bill to authorize the honorary appointment of Robert Dole to colonel

6)   A bill to change the address of a postal facility designated in honor of Captain Humayun Khan

7)   A bill that directs the Secretary of Education to recognize school employees award program

8)   A bill requiring the Secretary of Interior to process agreements regarding Colorado River drought

9)   A bill to expand public target ranges in some states

10)   A bill to compensate federal employees affected by lapses in appropriations

11) A bill to amend the charter of Future Farmers of America

That’s it folks!

In essence what this highlights is the fact that the bigger the government, the less that is accomplished.   Immigration, infrastructure, Medicare, Healthcare, those issues that are most pressing according to The People, are blocked by the House through Pelosi and Schumer.   The only way Trump can bypass the moronic is through Executive Order.

During Clinton’s term he issued 364 Executive Orders.   George Bush issued 165 Executive Orders. And Obama issued 215 Executive Orders, but altered history by utilizing Executive Memorandums as a means to circumvent public outcry. As such, Obama asserted a historic 644 Executive Memorandums and 1186 Presidential Proclamations through January 19, 2017. A vast number of Obama’s orders included the establishment of new agencies within the government including; Office of Urban Affairs, National Economic Council, Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Council on Women and Girls, Office of Health reform, Commission for the Study of Bioethical issues, Council of Governors, etc…, etc…

Despite the fact that even the most liberal within government agree that Obama crossed the threshold of legality in many of his Executive Orders and Memorandums, these transgressions have gone without consequence.

Trump has signed 109 Executive Orders and 42 Executive Memorandums.

Of course, one of the more controversial executive Orders issued by Obama was the Iran Nuclear Deal and the billions in payments to Iran including a massive interest rate for funds held due to sanctions.   The deal was administered and signed by then Secretary of State, John Kerry. The same John Kerry who maintains a majority of his wealth in offshore tax havens, and the same John Kerry who has been found to be secretly meeting with Iran government officials promising to reinstate the Iran Nuclear Deal, despite this being potentially in violation of the Logan Act.

Enacted in 1799, The Logan Act criminalizes anyone negotiating with a foreign government having a dispute with the United States. In addition, Kerry avoided a $500,000 tax bill on his 76 foot yacht by docking it in Rhode Island instead of his home state of Massachusetts.   A move that was seen as rather hypocritical given his continual cry for imposing ‘higher taxes’.

With 23 Democrat contenders for President in 2020, citing their accomplishments for The People as opposed to their personal gains will likely become a dominant debate.

Despite the more obvious issues abounding, Democrats continue to state as their top priorities:

Kamala Harris:   justice for immigrants, blacks and LGBT

Joe Biden:   A mini New Green Deal, anti-Trump and Make America Great Again

Cory Booker:   Anti-lynching, carbon tax for climate change, and rental control

Bernie:   free everything for everybody including all illegals present and future

Buttigeig:   Medicare for all who want it, Green New Deal, LGBT rights

Of course Medicare for all who want it is essentially the package of socialist medicine for the middle class, while the elite will continue to embrace their own private health insurance. LGBT rights are already essentially in effect.   The New Green Deal is scary given the Roosevelt New Deal was administered via Executive Order…   And justice for immigrants is a bizarre concept that bears a load of question marks.

Unfortunately, none of the candidates espouse anything that would make them unique with attainable goals.   But they are united on one common goal – demonize all things Trump and all Trump supporters.

US Education: A Broke Back Mountain

When one thinks the daft couldn’t get more daft, one might be rather daft….   In light of the tee-shirt slogan worn by a majority of college liberals which states “I don’t have time for hate, racism, misogyny, albeism, homophobia, Islamophobia, transphobia, bigoty” – segregation is required.   (Full disclosure I had to look up albeism).

As a result of their intolerance of the intolerable, and the need to have safe spaces, students now require segregated graduation ceremonies and segregated dormitories based on ethnicity, religion, identity, race, etc..

And a full 72% of colleges are apparently willing to comply.

It will be interesting to see how this lavishly daft intolerance survives in the work environment when these self obsessed students can’t whine and cry and demand the world conform to their ‘safe place’.

With titles such as Lavender Commencement, Gesta Latina Commencement, American Indian Indigenous Commencement, Don the Kente, etc… Virginia Tech boasts 10 different diversity ceremonies which are technically illegal under Discrimination laws.

Within this vein, Georgetown students have voted to increase tuition in order to create a pool of money to pay for ‘reparations’. The catch? The increased tuition is for ‘future students’, not them. And the extent of this generation of selfish self-consumed whiners is not just a product of a failed education system, but of a failed parent system.

Who is minding the children?

Over the last two decades, the number of children in full time daycare under the age of 5 hovers at 86%.   Four and under is 66%.   Daycare employee qualifications vary by state although most require a high school diploma or equivalent. The average entry pay is $10.50 per hour. In Washington DC a parent can expect to pay $36,000 per year per child for daycare. On the low end, in Mississippi, daycare runs about $8,000 per year per child.

For a family of four including 2 children, daycare can run from $16,000 to $72,000 annually or a mean of $44,000. That would be breakeven. With a mean salary in the US at $43,000 per year, there obviously comes a point where daycare is simply ludicrous. Aside from the financial cost is the social cost. The generation raised by an institution is coming of age. Their morality, ethics, values, and virtues have been impregnated by strangers who come and go within these institutions, and we are now witnessing the end product.

After paying a mean cost for daycare for 12 years – a total of $528,000, parents haven’t the funds to pay for college.   In 2009 when Obama reigned, student loan debt was $675 billion, today it has risen to $1.465 trillion representing 44 million borrowers, 10% of whom are 90 days past due. The debt has become so untenable that suicide is contemplated as the answer.

It has been likened to the concept of Socialism for the wealthy and Capitalism for the middle class and poor.   In other words, the next generation will wholly squeeze out all but the wealthy for a college education.  And there is no solution…

As we have recently been made aware, wealthy does not align with intellect. Bribes would seem to be the mainstream means of attaining a degree for the party lovers whose parents indulge the system. As such, some pundits point to Germany as a prime example of how an education system should work – free.

But of course, that isn’t the entire story.

When reviewing the percentage of college graduate rates around the world, Germany does not even make the top ten.   Canada is number one, Japan, Israel, Korea, UK, US, Australia, Finland, Norway, then Luxembourg rank highest in that order   All these countries are subject to a college cost, although it is somewhat lower than the US.

In Denmark where college is free, and a $1000 per month living stipend is available, they have found that students take advantage of the system and spend 6 years completing a 4 year degree because – well – it is free!   In addition, only 12% of the population actually attained a bachelor’s degree or higher, while 14% attained a technical or vocational degree, far below the graduation rate in the US which is roughly 48%.

Obviously, free is not the answer.

Pensions. In Canada, teachers pay 11.5% into their pension plan. In the US it is as low as 2% for a lifetime benefit.   The average teacher pension in Canada is $49,000, while the average teacher pension in the US is now $75,000.   That translates to reveal that a teacher’s average pension is 74% higher than the average salary.   In addition, teachers in 35 states also collect Social Security benefits. In Israel, the average pension for all retirees is roughly $33,000 per year.  The discrepancy is huge!

In essence, the pension system, the US labor unions, are the crux of the education cost problem given the average lifetime for receipt of a pension far exceeds the value of those dollars invested causing the cost of tuition to continually spiral.

The education system begins at the beginning – daycare.

As the cost of daycare continues to implode, the crisis of working parents scrambling to meet the cost while relegating their children to be raised by institutional high schoolers, is a cruel alternative. Free child care is hardly the answer. It will simply become a free-loaders babysitter, and a service that is already indoctrinating your children, will become the Communist agenda.

Retraining parents to have a sense of worth in raising their own children, in having a physical and emotional hand and foot in their elementary education will ultimately curb the cost of social daftness.  Overhauling the entire government pension system will help make US university graduates walk away with considerably less debt.  And a solid parental involvement just might create a healthier intellect, and thus subject their children to grants and scholarships…

Trump’s Visit to the UK: A Spectacle of Alice In Wonderland

President Trump is in the UK and the media is doing everything they can to uphold their crass, undignified, wormwood agenda. Oddly, while vilifying everything down to Melania’s dress, they continue to punctuate the meme that Trump is unpresidential.

The British media, a spattering of royals, the London mayor, and a hodge-podge of populace who pride themselves on being proper and dignified, have instead invoked their dark side and clamored to be all things crass and CNN.

Chuck Todd of NBC went so far as to declare that Trump is interfering in the British elections by supporting Boris Johnson’s candidacy.   No president or prime minister in history has ever evoked a reprisal for supporting a particular candidate in an election in a foreign country. Ever.   In fact, Macron, Merkel, May, Khan, Trudeau, etc… have all voiced rather belligerent offensive statements toward Trump.

And somehow the vast hypocrisy is lost on a intellect that has either been abducted by aliens, or morphed into the insanity of drugs.

London’s mayor, Khan has been an outspoken critic vilifying Trump since he began running for US President, but apparently that’s okay.   Meghan Markel had the audacity to speak in ‘nasty’ terms about Trump, and that’s okay.   Prince Harry is sulking.   And a Queen who has spent her entire life living a fully funded extravagant lifestyle simply because she was born, while actually ‘doing’ nothing is revered.

Lady Gaga met Queen Elizabeth dressed as the Queen of Hearts from Alice in Wonderland. And that’s okay.   Because in reality, Lady Gaga was making a statement that within the realm of Obama, we were living in the land of Alice.

Historically, Jackie Kennedy voiced her displeasure with the Queen, finding her petty and self obsessed.   The media was largely quiet because, – she was Jackie Kennedy.

Obama committed gaffe after gaffe when in the presence of the Queen, but those moments were simply justified as; ‘he is just human’.   And Michelle continually gaffed with her choice of dresses sometimes matching the Queen and other times donning hot pink. OUCH!

Imagine if the US held such protest rallies mocking and denigrating the Queen…   We would be held to the highest tribunal and court martialed.   The British media would go berserk denouncing the American pilgrims as ignorant, crass, and beneath basic decorum.

Protesting Trump because of his anti-abortion and immigration stance, making obscene and verbose statements with regard to Trump, Melania, and Ivanka, this is the British representation of ‘honor and integrity’.   The same people who decry that Trump is not of the royal family and unacceptable consider these public statements British decorum.

But these are truly the days of Alice whereby Michelle Obama was called the most powerful woman in the world and a fashion and fitness icon… by the British media. (I imagine the Queen was not pleased given her demeanor as Global Highness).

But the British Royals have become rather odd in their recent evolution, preferring Hollywoodites to statesmen, crooners to scientists, and comic book characters to intellectuals.

Knighthood used to be an honor bestowed on a man for his service to the monarch or church. Most often it was a military grant levied for valor and sacrifice. But it has morphed into a bit of a joke wherein the likes of Bono, Bush, McCartney, Stewart, Caine, Elton-John, Geldof, and other celebrities have become the nom-de-pleur beneficiaries.   As a result, the British Monarchy has made Knighthood a veritable Academy Award for celluloid heroes.   And exchanged dignity for a Shakespearean Comedy wherein the actors don Masks.

In the end, Trump’s delightful joke in referring to Meghan Markel as a great American princess was lost on the celluloids, the British, and CNN for its truism in the world of Alice.  

The Art Of Words – A manipulation for Socialist Ideologies

It was less than a decade ago that the definition of religion was the ‘belief in God’, or ‘gods’.   The criteria was important for many reasons one of which was status as a nontaxable entity.   And then sometime in the morphology of propaganda, religion was redefined and few seem to have noticed. Scholars have thus created a virtual monster with Emile Durkheim infusing this rather convoluted definition: “a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a church, all those who adhere to them.”

As a result the limits of rationale were pushed to the extreme when the church of spaghetti claimed they filled this criteria. They wore a colander for a headpiece and worshiped – spaghetti.

Another form of Word Art is the creation of an entirely new use for a word such as ‘protectionism’.   Utilized to further condemn Trump, the concept states, “Most of the US trading partners consider its trading policies as manifestations of protectionism.”   Everyone assumes this must be a bad thing and move on without having the most basic understanding of how this statement is grossly manipulated.

“Protectionism is the economic policy of restricting imports from other countries through methods such as tariffs on imported goods, import quotas, and a variety of other government regulations.”

How could ‘tariffs’ be attributed to Trump?   Tariffs were first imposed in the US in 1789. They were the largest source of government revenue prior to the 1913 declaration that called for a federal income tax under Woodrow Wilson, the father of the precipitated fall of income equality.

At one point tariffs were imposed at the rate of 51% in Great Britain, Russia climbed to 73%, Germany was 40% etc…  Trump had yet to be born.  And Protectionism was a global institution.

According to the World Bank, Africa is the largest practitioner of ‘free trade’. The World Bank also states that as a direct result Africa is less industrialized than it was four decades ago.  Oops!

Balanced Trade is Trump’s agenda.   The Balance of Trade is essential in order to maintain comparative absolutes. The US Trade Deficit has grown from $-0- to $891 billion between 1950 and 2018. That deficit has a significant wobbling impact on the US economy while lifting other economies, specifically;   China and Germany. This deficit is partially funded by an imbalance in tariffs.  An imbalance that Trump is diligently working to correct.

So, protectionism was actually at the forefront of Germany, France, Canada, Mexico and China until Trump.

Another nuance that has gone unnoticed is the fact that Global Warming morphed to Climate Change, morphed to Climate Science. Science was likely a creative means to apply legitimacy to a highly charged manipulated ‘bubble’.   That ‘bubble’ has made a few individuals vastly wealthy on its propaganda, including Al Gore.   The Socialists and Progressives clamored aboard the con man’s wagon and began touting the elixir. But few understand where the $$$$ go to ‘fight Global Warming/Science.  Africa is the dominant beneficiary of those $$$$, a continent where there are no global warming ramifications… And the absolute hypocrisy is somehow – lost.

‘Reproductive Rights’ is another bastardization of the English language.   Reproductive means to reproduce which requires the mutual consent of a man and a woman in order to create a child.   Once that child is created, one is no longer desiring the right to reproduce because it has already occurred.   It is no longer a reproductive right, it is now a human right.

The ‘Right’ was initially coined in 1968 by Tehran in which parents were legally allowed the right to determine the number of children they wanted to have and the spacing between.   It wasn’t until 1994 that Cairo, in the midst of an HIV/AIDS crisis, declared that Reproductive Rights were extended to include care for sexually transmitted diseases, and post-abortion care.  In 1995, Beijing made their own determination and stated that the definition was about reproduction and any forthcoming child was the responsibility of both the man and woman involved in said reproduction.

IN 2002, the UN put it’s proverbial arse on the line after being accused of advocating coerced abortions.  The reason for the coercion?   Quite simply – Depopulation.  In order to cleanse that abuse, Women’s Right’s were rewired to emphasize the right to an abortion.   And in essence the coercion became a propaganda tool in which women were the target. And they fell for it.

As a result, the emphasis of Reproductive Rights became – abortion on demand which has absolutely nothing to do with Reproduction Rights, Human Rights, or Women’s Rights.

There are a host of other words that have been artfully redefined; judgment, patriotism, nationalism, and even – Socialism, which has been regurgitated to be defined as:   “an economic and political system where the ways of making a living (factories, offices, etc.) are owned by the workers who run them and the people who depend on them, meaning the value made belongs to the people who make it, instead of a group of private owners.”

In London, the first consciously Socialist movement was lead by Karl Marx and Mikhail Bokunin, both of whom were Russian Jewish anarchist revolutionaries. Their ideology instituted the Paris Commune in which the concept of Separation of Church and State was instituted to squelch religion and promote secularism. Within 2 months, Paris defeated the principles.

WWI ushered in Socialist Doctrine in the former Tzarist Soviet Russia. Nazi Germany was built on the Socialist Party platform by Hitler. And the EU Commission indoctrinated 28 countries into a massive propaganda wherein an individual, a city, a nation, were subject to the rule of a bastardized monarchial totalitarian select few.

In essence, the rule that leveled the Soviet Union into economic collapse was subsequently modeled by the EU. Thus, the definition was altered from Communist Marxism to Equality and Rights.

Word Art – it isn’t really Art at all, it is simply another tool of manipulation that has been parlayed for the purpose of indoctrination.   And like sheeple, the people baaed and fell onto their backs – caste.

RAND Corporation; A Princess, A Singer, A Hollywood Mogul, A Business Magnate – All NGO’s Lead To George Soros

The RAND Corporation was created in 1948 by the Douglas Aircraft Company to research and analyze US armed forces with funds provided by the ever Liberal, Ford Foundation.   Today it is a vast conglomerate NGO financed by governments, universities, and private endowments to essentially act as the Global Kingsman for all things economic, defense, ‘child policy’, civil and criminal justice, education, insurance, welfare, and health. In other words, it became the shadow government.

While it creatively states that it is ‘independent, with no political influence or ideology, it’s Board is a who’s who of Clintonite advisors with a few doting Republicans that identify as McCain allies.

In 1982 after RAND conducted a study on the value of free health care vs paid health care and found no correlative difference, insurance carriers realized they had a free milk and instituted deductibles. Within five years 90% of all insurance carriers charged deductibles. In 1991 a study provided by RAND regarding the cost benefits of no-fault insurance was highly criticized due to faulty information, poor research, unprovable claims, and most importantly the fact that insurance carriers were instrumental in funding the report that ultimately proved to favor them and mislead the public.

On their About Page, they claim that they research and find solutions to make the world safer, more secure, healthier, and more prosperous.   To that end, they claim that RAND was responsible for the technology that made The Internet viable. But they actually would seem to have done – nothing. At least nothing that they will highlight as an accomplishment. Oddly, no one else can highlight an accomplishment either.

RAND expanded to the EU, Australia and the Middle East with offices in Qatar, in order to extend it’s thumb of influence. One of its more notable eccentric scientists was Herman Kahn, who advocated nuclear warfare with the Soviet Union claiming that even if a few million American’s survived, that would be plenty to rebuild a New World Order.

Kahn was infamously portrayed by Peter Sellers in the movie Dr. Strangelove as a Nazi scientist bent on destroying the world with what Kahn foretold – The Doomsday Machine.

Transparency has never been it’s forte. Their 2016 nonprofit 990 form reveals that total assets are about $500 million, government grants account for nearly 80% of its revenue totaling over $344 million, and compensation and subcontract pay accounts for roughly 78% of expenses.   And yet, their reports fail to provide much of anything useful. So why do they continue to reap US government grants?

Trustees include: Carl Bildt, former Swedish PM, currently on the board for the International Crisis Group, which has been accused of “manufacturing crises”.   Chuck Hagel former Secretary of Defense under Obama who was forced to resign. Richard Danzig who served as Secretary of Navy under Clinton.   Kenneth Feinberg, a US attorney who served as “Master” over the 9-11 victim compensation fund, Agent Orange liability, the $20 billion BP oil spill claims and TARP, among many other relief funds. Lionel Johnson, also of the Clinton advisory pack. Etc… Etc…

Private funding for RAND has come from Bill and Melinda Gates, MacArthur Foundation, NATO, World Bank, WHO, OECD, European Commission, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, 21 Departments within the US government, Harvard, Texas University, Sloan Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, etc..

RAND has been in the mix of nearly every major event despite their ‘Independent’ status including the Common Core Education initiative paralleling the likes of Soros Open Society, Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clintons. While RAND has lost much of its glory, that would not seem to translate to its grants.   But where there is money, Soros is likely close by.

The Revenue Watch Institute which was initially formed by Soros Open Society is affiliated with a host of NGO’s including RAND, Oxfam, Tides, and the London School of Economics.   It states as its mission “Public Transparency, Poverty Relief, and Open Society”.  Its name morphed into Revenue Watch, and later Resource Governance. The Chair of the Board of Directors for Resource Governance is Ernesto Zedillo, former president of Mexico and devout Socialist Revolutionary.   Among many seemingly prestigious memberships, he counts “The Elders”.   Created in 2007 by Nelson Mandela, and located in London, The Elders is another NGO of peace activists, human rights activists and statesmen.   Their stated goal is to – “ work on solutions for seemingly insurmountable problems such as  climate change, HIV/AIDS, and poverty, as well as to “use their political independence to help resolve some of the world’s most intractable conflicts.” 

Funded by Richard Branson, Ted Turner thru the UN Foundation, Princess Mabel – of Orange-Nassau, and Peter Gabriel, and led by Jimmy Carter, Kofi Annan and Nelson Mandela, they advocate for:   1) Universal Healthcare,   2) Abortion on demand,   3) Massive immigration tolerance, 4)   A stronger UN toward ultimate globalization, 5)   Greater recognition of climate change through financing the Paris Accord, 6)   Women’s equality, particularly in universal healthcare wherein religion pushes discriminatory attitudes toward abortion, 7)   A Mandela mandate that youth be a targeted propaganda market, 8)   Proponent of and assisted in the establishment of the Iran Nuclear Deal, 9)  Demonstrative in their belief that the return of the 1967 boundaries between Israel and Palestine be immediate.

Throughout these initiatives, they routinely denounce President Trump for changing the path that these men have worked so hard to drive, and altering the course of the New World Order, Globalization, and Marxist doctrine.

Princess Mabel is the widow of Prince Friso of the Netherlands.  Friso lost his royal status as a result of his marriage because it was discovered that Mabel had lied about the extent of her contacts with a well known drug lord, Klaas Bruinsma. Princess Mabel is an advisor to the Open Society Foundation, she was formerly a Director for the EU Affairs branch of OSF in Brussels, as well as an International Advocacy Director for the Open Society Institute in London.  She is the Princess of the NWO.

As the circle expands somewhat we now find additional puppeteers diligently working within the Soros world agenda while reaping US government funding.  The NGO’s and Universities have contrived a web so massive, that finding the link can be daunting.  Within this blog we have identified: Nelson Mandela, Kofi Annan, Princess Mabel, Richard Brannson, Peter Gabriel, Ted Turner, the UN, Oxfam, London School of Economics, Oxfam, Harvard, Resource Governance – and RAND.

The home court?

The Netherlands and UK, ie, the US is still only a colony doing the bidding of The Queen.

ChildCare – Or Communist Propaganda?

The Democrats are unveiling a platform with regard to the ‘childcare crisis in the US’. Modeled after the Communist German regime status, they advocate for a state run ‘daycare’ that will confiscate your child after six months.   The entire premise is fashioned after the notion that a mother can’t properly succeed in her career path when she is bothered by the nuisance of raising her child.  

To alleviate this atrocity, they advocate for a Federally run daycare system that is affordable and of high quality wherein parents can deposit their child and leave for the next twelve hours to pursue their own agenda.   Teachers will be trained by the government under a strict code of Liberalism, gender neutrality, gender anonymous, and racial equality.   Boys and girls will no longer exist, the terms mother and father will be subject to judicial review and possible fines, and the quality of education will thus be exponentially increased.

An opinion piece in the New York Times by an education expert, Shael Polakow-Suransky, advocates this sort of early childhood indoctrination. Mr. Suransky would appear to be unmarried and childless, but is nonetheless an expert on raising children. After exponentiating on the litany of justifications; cost, pay scale of teachers, lack of interaction, lack of an ‘early learning environment’, Suransky doubles down on the basic premise, moms want to work but can’t because they are burdened with a child.

All of which is basic fodder for the ‘Constitutional Right’ for Abortion. According to Cory Booker.

The thread would be that since you don’t really ‘want’ a child, but had one anyway, why not simply alleviate the burden and give the child to the “State”?     The state will then administer all the compulsory initiatives and educational evaluations, in order to determine exactly where your child belongs in the global system.

This is exactly what Germany instituted decades ago – and no one blinked.

No one blinked… but they also stopped having children. Now Merkel is hypo demanding immigration, she doesn’t care who, what, where or how, her only concern is there is no one to support the retirees.   Because no one had children. Because the state was raising them. So why bother…?

This agenda worked so well for Germany, that the very blinky eyed Liberals in the US think this is the solution for the US as well.   Don’t have children – unless you intend to release them to the state and support massive immigration wherein their rate of birthing is 6-10 times that of the nationals.

Except everyone is on welfare.

And thus – Germany’s economy flounders near recession levels despite Merkel and Juncker’s attempts to provide ‘fake news’ to absolve their guilt.

In essence, Germany has become the model of everything Communism.

Mr. Suransky, is currently the President of Bank Street College of Education.   Notable graduate school alumni include: Bill Ayers. The former leader of the Weather Underground, a radical activist who identifies as a communist, who conducted numerous bombings of Federal, State and public buildings.   After his stint bombing and killing people, Ayers began his career in primary education ultimately earning various Master’s degrees, at Federal Expense, and becoming a Professor at the University of Illinois.

He is – the Poster Child of Bank Street College of Education that supports state childcare for all as of six months of age, because those are the formative learning years…before entering public school – Kindergarten.

The Liberal agenda calls for 1) increased pay for childcare workers to match school ‘educators’,   2)   federal subsidy of all federal childcare,   3)   price controls   4)   Teacher education…   5)   Liberalism.

I remember well, when the Parent agenda with schools was about stupidity:   Remember the math 3 minute score?   My son was not doing well, so I taught him to answer all the scores he knew easily first, and down the line.   His scores immediately went into the 90th percentile and I was called before the School Board and radically denounced.

Another instance, another child, my middle school son left his homework assignment in his locker. He respectfully asked to retrieve it. He was denied and given a zero. When I sat before the council of seven to one, they informed me that they were teaching him real life principles that were specific to the world of business. My response: “I see, so if an executive leaves his presentation for a Board Meeting, in his office, and excuses himself to retrieve it, his manager will give him an “F”, fire him and never have the presentation…

Obviously, they didn’t understand because none of these middle school teachers had ever worked in the world of business.

That was then – this is now.

Today, the fight would be over the toilet, the gender usage, the political sway.   And I would be in court – weekly, at the very least.

But my argument then is the same as my argument now: I will raise him. You may teach him based on absolutes.   Hence; Math, English, History, and chocolate.  Now, go away.

GerryMandering – Coming To A State Near You! The Obama /Holder Plan To Socialize The US

Of the 435 seats in the House of Representatives, the Democrats and Socialists sit in 235 of them.   Of the 100 seats in the Senate, Democrats and Socialists sit in 49 of them.   In 2020, all 435 House seats are up for re-election.   And their accomplishments will be up for scrutiny. This is why Pelosi needs them to back off Impeachment, because after two years in office they have nothing to show worthy of their wage. As such they risk giving away the House if they don’t get out of their respective seats and actually work.

For some who have been holding their chair for 30+ years, they have already milked the political empire and reaped the reward of elite status and wealth.   Doing anything of consequence is no longer important. Too often candidates run unchallenged.   Kamala Harris was re-elected because no one ran against her.   Ocasio ran in a District that she doesn’t live in.   Bezo lost and decided that was good on the resume to then run for President.   I don’t think the Democrats have a clue what is important, what people want, or what it means to be honest and genuine.   And perhaps like the Trump win in 2016, those lacking attributes will contribute to their demise and fall.

Joe Scarborough, a career politician who worked in the world of law for exactly two years, had one case that he backed out of – is telling Trump he doesn’t know how to negotiate.   In politics, that would mean Trump doesn’t know how to accept bribes and follow the rules of order established by The Swamp.

It is always interesting to hear Hollywooders and career politicians lecture business ethics and business acumen when they have never worked for a living.   Joe Scarborough makes $6 million per year to sit on a stage set and spew hate rants.   His wife makes $2 million to do the same…   Why aren’t they complaining about gender equality in pay?

The Power of Money has created a dervish Swamp of its own. Desperate to hear and see themselves on television, these money idol worshipers seem to think they are intellectuals.    Journalists with degree’s in art, Hollywooders with no degree at all, brazenly exalt their incompetence and sore lack of knowledge while applauding each other.

But just as Hollywood has felt a belt tightening given their inability to simply remain celluloid heroes, the House and Senate re-elections will undoubtedly focus on lacking accomplishments and wasted time.

If we take a look at the accomplishments of most politicians, the stark reality is that they have done absolutely nothing their entire tenure.   Even Chuck Schumer is a case in point.   While he makes headlines as Pelosi’s sidekick, his political career has been entirely about – getting re-elected. He got his foothold into politics by running in a NY District that was predominantly black and Hispanic – roughly 60%.   With one exception, it has been a Democratic stronghold since 1943.   People vote by party, instead of by person, and that is how Schumer began his political career, and how he has jumped Districts to keep his political career. The same strategy was used by Ocasio-Cortez who ran in a predominantly poor, black/Hispanic District that always voted Democrat despite continuing the level of poverty for decades.

Maxine Waters first ran in California’s 29th District that was nearly 70% Hispanic and had voted Democrat since 1957. After redistricting, she was assigned to California’s 35th which was over 70% Hispanic. Out of a population of roughly 710,000, voter turnout in 2014 was 62,000, and in 2018 it was 149,000 representing a rate of 8.7% and 21% respectively.   Again, roughly the same as Ocasio.

Nancy Pelosi was shoed into two Democrat Districts with voter turnout ranging in the low to mid 20th percentile. She left after redistricting in 2011 caused a hard conservative lean and was ‘redistricted’ to a Democrat stable once again where voter turnout was roughly 47% and 70% Democrat.

In other words, Democrats move to where they will have no contest.

ThinkProgress and The Brennan Institute, both highly controversial Liberal organizations with Deep Soros Pockets, are claiming that Republicans are resorting to Gerrymandering by blocking funds for their redistricting plans in Michigan. A liberal NGO, Voters Not Politicians, managed to put an initiative on the 2018 ballot that altered the Michigan Constitution whereby redistricting would be done by an “Independent council” instead of by politicians.   That Independent Council is essentially the Obama/Holder redistricting plan set in motion after Hillary’s loss. It allows Obama/Holder and their protogee’s to create gerrymandering lines in advance of the 2020 election:

“The National Democratic Redistricting Committee is the centralized hub for executing a comprehensive redistricting strategy that shifts the redistricting power, creating fair districts where Democrats can compete.”

“In the past few years, courts have overturned gerrymandered maps in Virginia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Texas.”

Coming to a State near you –