How DO we know how much is real and how much is the Matrix? History has been rewritten or modified on a continuum loop. How much of the present is also rewired? How much is green screen or AI technology? Over two years ago we were told Pope Francis (Bergoglio) wouldn’t live beyond Christmas. Yet he continues to reign over the Vatican having been instructed to ‘stack the deck’ as it were with ideological clones.
Bergoglio was chosen as the successor of Pope Benedict when Benedict suddenly resigned in 2013 claiming declining health. But he lived 9 more years. Benedict was the first Pope to resign since 1415. Yet this anomaly was overlooked and considered his choice. Benedict died in 2022 “after declining health for several days”. So why did Pope Benedict really resign?
It is parlayed that Soros, Clinton and Obama conspired to insert Pope Francis whose time in Argentina was mired in his collaboration with the 2001 riots wherein he was asserted to have sacrificed 2 Jesuit Priests to the guerillas in order to save himself. They were tortured.
Thus Bergoglio became the perfect candidate for The Cartel. Regaining the Vatican.
After Pope Benedict ‘was retired’, a riff between Francis and Benedict was quite heated despite the media claiming it was all a mirage. It is highly likely, given the Cartel Order, that Benedict was forced out and Francis moved in to initiate the decline of The Church and Catholicism. The purpose? Religion and faith interfere with Control.
September 2023, Bill Clinton George Soros, Alex Soros, and the Chairman of the Open Society were invited to the Vatican to – what? The implementation of ‘the final Act’? Or simply to introduce Alex Soros as the successor power to which The Vatican must answer? These officiates over the Vatican have no religion – they are like the Zionists – Secular.
Of course, they are not just ordinary seculars – they are representatives of the Highest Order! Who makes the claim that Catholicism is failing? The Mafia is making the claim. How is it measured? Against what previous measure? The Matrix. representatives of the Highest Order. Media parlay is whipped into action to continue the loop that Catholicism is a waning religion. But The extent of the decline is unknown given the means for statistically measuring this loss of faith is based on an ‘online survey’ of 1,000 pre selected persons. Polls no longer exist. Statistics are worthless. And facts are presented that have no basis in evidence.
But the elimination of religion is the focus. Owning The Vatican is the means within The Matrix. It provides a circular presentation of illusion. Of course nothing is without its basis in MONEY. The secondary coup would be to take control of the assets of The Vatican. Not just the vast hordes of artwork, antiquities, jewels, and property, but Original history documents that would explain The World – in all its glorious fabrication.
In the Jewish Babylonia Talmud, two sorcerers are mentioned, Mamre and Johana, both recognized in the writings of Solomon and Paul. Jewish texts refer to them as the ‘wise men’ sorcerers who performed magic and ultimately converted to Judaism despite its existence not yet created. The term Judaism didn’t exist until the 11th and 12th centuries AD. The same time that the ‘oldest’ rendering of The Torah is in existence.
Within the Matrix, the Torah’s statement regarding the “Sorcerers” is further substantiated by Pliny The Elder whose original writings do not exist and first published in 1469 – 1400 years after his death. Marking the fact that Pliny likely never existed and his writings were created in the 15th century by the Pope’s Bishops and Zionists.
During this time frame, Pope Paul II was the overseer of the Papal States.
In 1457, Julius Pomponius-Laetus dedicated his life to the study of the ancient world, including the rites and mysteries of pagan Rome – including the birth of Romulus, the first King of the Roman Empire – a mythological figure. Pomponius was arrested by Pope Paul II for his scathing atheist attributes. Pope Paul was a materialist and supporter of Jews. He was also attributed with the introduction of Papal printing – as in History. Conjecture claims that Pope Paul was a homosexual whose death was a result of sodomy by a page boy.
In 1486, Pico della Mirandola founded the tradition of Christian Kabbalah. Taught by a Jewish atheist, Mirandola became fascinated with the writings and had his longtime friend translate Judaic manuscripts of mysticism and magic practices. During this time he embraced Platoism and Aristotelianism. The oldest Manuscripts of which were created sometime in the 11th and 12th centuries – 1700 years after the existence of Plato and Aristotle..
It was while recovering from the brutal assault laid upon Mirandola by the husband of the woman with whom he had an affair that Pico was introduced to the Judaic Kabbalah or Divine Magic. The Kabballah proports to be the source of all secrets encrypted only for those predetermined to be the esoteric agents of Kingship on earth. It supports Jews who fervently believe they are the ONLY chosen ones and that once a person has reached the pinnacle of performing magic – they have reached the peak of intellectual ‘enlightenment’ in the hierarchy over all mankind which is where the Global Order originated.
Before the arrival and rise of Kabbalistic thought there was the Hasidei Ashkenaz Movement born in medieval Germany during the 12th and 13th centuries. It honors a theology of mysticism and is based in Kabbalism. One of the tenets conceives that man must ‘Fear God’.
After Judaism went thru a period in history of ‘antisemitism’ due to their pronunciations of sorcery intermingled with God, by the 16th century, occultists adopted the Kabballah. And the Kabbalah became a tenet of the Satan occultists. One of the reasons noted for the Jewish people rejecting Christ as the Mesiah was because they believe His powers to heal were magic r sorcery ascribed to Him by Satan. Thus the hatred of Catholicism as taught by the Jews was because they perceive the Catholic church leaders to be rooted in – Satanism.
FULL CIRCLE:
Historically, it appears that the vast majority of Popes were not aligned with The Bible – but instead dabbled in the Occult, Mysticism, and the Christian Kabbalah. Popes only began to teach a pious religiosity to The People in recent times. Prior to this reinterpretation – Popes acted as the sovereign government – heads over the Crown. Politicians.
WHEN has the Vatican behaved in a manner consistent with The Bible?
While the Vatican was first intended in 1506 with the cornerstone of St Peters Basilica – making it a pilgrimage site, the Vatican as an independent entity wasn’t created until 1929 under Mussolini – a fascist. It was thru his actions that Italy came to be a ‘Uniparty’ government, or what used to be called a one-party dictatorship.
It would appear that Pope Benedicts ‘forced retirement’ was due to his unwillingness to allow The Vatican to be usurped by secular Zionism – which had happened at various times throughout history. It would imply that Pope Francis’ Vatican is run by secular Zionists. It would imply that “The Secrets” date from the 11th century to present day. And it would imply that the Matrix has facilitated a false Reality of that is fragmenting…
All of Jewish “law” can be summed up in the statement “Is it good for the Jews?” Allowing polio to reappear in Gaza is good for the Jews, as is IDF soldiers sodomizing prisoners. Everything is allowed by Talmudic law, if it is “good for the Jews”
Can you explain the difference between Rashi’s commentary in Torah and Gemara (Talmud)?
Rashi feared the hatred of Xtian hostility toward the Talmud. In Paris 1242 the Poop pope and king of Frog France burned all the hand written Talmudic manuscripts in the whole of France. This threat caused Rashi to conceal his understanding of Talmudic common law. Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash a common law commentary. The vast majority of Rashi comments on the Talmud not based upon the פרדס common law kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva. The major criticism made by the Baali Tosafot against their grand fathers commentary to the Talmud, that Rashi did not learn the Talmud as common law based upon precedents. The Hebrew for precedent … בנין אב.
The Rashi p’shat learned on the Talmud radically and disastrously impacted his commentary on Midrash Rabbah. There too Rashi p’shat does not follow the common law Rashi p’shat of his Chumash commentary. Rather Rashi p’shat on both the Talmud and Midrash duplicates the sh’itta of Ibn Ezra’s theory of p’shat; limited pretty much to a literal interpretation. About 25% of Rashi p’shat on the Chumash also follows this Ibn Ezra טיפש פשט literalism.
Why טיפש פשט? All the Xtian Bible mistranslations limit themselves to a טיפש פשט guideline. For example: בראשית contains the words ברית אש, ראש בית, ב’ ראשית yet all Bible translations limit their interpretation to “In the Beginning”. Another example of טיפש פשט heroin addiction to literal translations: the Sin of the Golden Calf where טיפש פשט understands this רמז Golden Calf metaphor restricted to a literal Golden Calf. This bird brained literalism makes thousands of generations of Xtian utterly ignorant to the commandment not to translate the Divine Presence Spirit Name יקוה (sp) to other words, like Allah, Lord, Yahweh, Jehovah etc etc etc. The רוח הקודש which Xtianaity transforms into their Trinity mystery nonsense dogmatism, this addiction to the heroin drug of literalism cause all generations of both Xtian and Muslim/Arab believers to fail to grasp that the Spirit Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment Spirit and not a word.
The טיפש פשט of Jesus who taught prayer as: “Our Father who art in Heaven etc”. The brit (This term does not correctly translate into “covenant”.) a oath sworn from within the heart NOT the Heavens. A precedent for this critical interpretation, from the p’suk: build me a Mishkan and I shall dwell within YOU”. The רוח הקודש Spirit Divine Presence lives within the hearts of His oath brit alliance People. Hence tefillah, (mistranslated as prayer), a matter of the heart and NOT the Heavens as Jesus falsely instructed his pupils.
That Rabbinical law allows gang rape of Palestinian prisoners, resulting in internal injuries and even death, tells me all I need to know about Jewish “law” There simply are no limits to their depravity.
Contrast the stark differences between the g’lut ghetto Jews from the Israelis. Chag Tishah B’Av celebrates the destruction of the Av tumah avoda zarah of king Shlomo’s assimilation and intermarriages. (The two Torah negative commandments which defines the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to whoreship other Gods.) Whooooooooop rejoice over the destruction of king Shlomo’s Av tumah Catholic like Cathedral/Temple. On this day Israelis rededicate holy to HaShem our pursuit to restore and re-establish Sanhedrin lateral common law courtrooms across the country in the pursuit of justice. Justice: judicial imposed fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews.
The construction of the First and Second Temples never actually commanded by HaShem in the Torah, contrary to the traditional understanding. The Temple constructions represented an abomination of assimilation and intermarriage; exposing “avoda zarah” (foreign worship). Meaning, bnai brit abandonment of Torah established culture and customs in favor of embracing and following Goyim cultures and customs ie assimilation.
The Temples construction, therefore akin to “Catholic Cathedrals”; foreign-influenced places of worship that betrayed authentic Jewish faith: the pursuit of judicial common law justice through Sanhedrin courtrooms. The Second Commandment absolutely rejects the vanity of man attempting to believe in Gods. Such a pursuit simply beyond the scope of the Human mind to grasp. Goyim avoda zarah by contrast prioritized through dogmatism and theological creeds defines belief systems such as the Nicene Creed or the Mohammedan belief in one God.
Therefore, the repeated destruction of these Temples on the 9th of Av, from the post Shoah Israeli perspective, viewed as a most positive event. Celebrations of Chag 9th of Av eliminates this violation of the Second Commandment, and the “Av tumah” (impurity) associated with them.
Rather than the g’lut curse of mourning the Temples’ destruction, this post-Holocaust Israeli view celebrates the 9th of Av as a necessary step to restore the Jewish people’s proper spiritual priority and path of faith, as dictated by the prophet Nathan’s words to King David. This spiritual path emphasizes the pursuit of true justice, as exemplified by King David’s failure to stand trial before a Capital Crimes Sanhedrin courtroom over the matter of Bathsheba’s first husband.
Mourning the 9th of Av: This view emphasizes the historical tragedies the result of av tumah avoda zarah, that led to the destruction of the Temple(s), such as the assimilation and intermarriage which define the corrupt reign of King Solomon. Which resulted in a permanent Civil War between the divided kingdoms of Yechuda vs. Israel.
This post Shoah perspective views false messiah theologies which require that the messiah rebuilds the Temple as absolute tumah avoda zarah. Such tumah rabbinic “theology” copies the new testament false idea of messiah, much like king Shlomo copied the cultures and customs of Goyim civilizations which construct Huge and ruinously costly Cathedrals throughout the annals of recorded history. Emulating the customs of foreign, non-Jewish civilizations, a flagrant violation of the Jewish faith.
Emulating the customs of foreign, non-Jewish civilizations in the construction of the Temple, or false messiah theologies as best exemplified in the prophet “Natans” support for Shabbetai Tzvi, understood as a flagrant violation of authentic Jewish faith and the Second Commandment. It represents a betrayal of true Judaism, which requires obedience to the Torah faith לשמה, the first Commandment of Sinai.
The construction of the Temple, with its incorporation of foreign, non-Jewish customs and traditions, simply viewed as a flagrant violation of the Second Commandment, which prohibits the worship of other gods.
The argument that monotheism itself, the belief in only one true God, makes it impossible to worship other “lesser” gods as prohibited by the Second Commandment. Therefore the theology of monotheism directly profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment. The Temple construction, with its foreign influences, therefore seen as a betrayal of this core tenet of the Second Commandment.
The destruction of the Temples on the 9th of Av, thus celebrated as the necessary elimination of this violation of the Second Commandment, and a return to the authentic Jewish faith free from foreign influence and the corruption of monotheistic beliefs.
How to do Torah mitzvot לשמה
Never 10 commandments. A טיפש פשט/bird brained literal reading of Torah metaphors! Because Israel had sex with their wives prior to the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, they thought they would immediately die due to their tumah spiritual condition. After the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment all Israel demanded that Moshe rise and receive the rest of the Torah. Therefore the 10 commandment metaphor makes reference to the 10 plagues of Egypt. Because the Torah directly commands all generations to remember the salvation from Egyptian slavery through the 10 plagues.
The טיפש פשט of doing Torah commandments לשמה, doing these commandments “for the sake of Heaven”. This bird-brained theology understands doing Torah commandments with “pure intentions”. Such religious rhetoric sounds pious. But like an onion, simply peeling away the “skin” of this religious rhetoric nonsense exposes an empty void lack of substance, other than sweet sounding words.
Why? Doing the mitzvot לשמה absolutely requires the פרדס Oral Torah revelation at Horev! This Oral Torah logic system defines all T’NaCH and Talmudic judicial rulings! The pursuit of justice defines all Torah faith ie doing mitzvot לשמה. The 10 plagues define mitzvot done לשמה. Hence the Torah makes the 10 commandment metaphor to serve as a precedent to understand how the 10 plagues qualify as doing mitzvot לשמה. HaShem pursued the judicial oppression of the Courtroom of Par’o in the matter of withholding the straw required to make bricks through the 10 plagues לשמה.
To engage critically with traditional ideas. Nuanced dialogue and challenging dogmatic thinking can lead to richer understandings. The pursuit of justice simply central to defining what it means to do mitzvot לשמה, and that this relates to the metaphor of the 10 plagues.
How? HaShem pursued the judicial oppression of the Courtroom of Par’o in the matter of withholding the straw required to make bricks through the 10 plagues לשמה.
How does the Oral Torah’s emphasis on legal reasoning and the pursuit of justice inform your understanding of this concept?
The פרדס logic system organizes the T’NaCH & Talmud into a warp/weft loom-like system. The Talmud has halachic and aggadic portions. The agadic portions of the Talmud make a drosh back to T’NaCH p’sukim. These p’sukim learn through a פרט\כלל rule of Oral Torah logic. Meaning, absolutely forbidden to study a T’NaCH verse divorced from within the larger context of its surrounding sugyah/sub-chapter. Oral Torah logic compares the sugyah of prophetic mussar to other similar sugyot of prophetic mussar found within the same Book of that prophet or other prophetic Books encompassing the whole of the T’NaCH literature.
This wisdom of comparing Case/Din sugyot to similar Case/Din sugyot defines the unique logic system format known as the Oral Torah as defined by the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic.
Why the common טיפש פשט portrayal of לשמה as having “pure intentions” simply an oversimplification that lacks substance?
Consider the tohor time oriented commandment of tefillah. This tohor time oriented commandment requires כוונה/k’vanna. Failure to attempt this mitzva with the required k’vanna invalidates the act of tefillah as void. This mitzva delves into the Torah requirement of שם ומלכות. Simply translating Name & Kingship as much a טיפש פשט as interpreting לשמה as “pure intentions”.
Kingship most intrinsically refers to the revelation of the 13 tohor middot revelation at Horev. This 13 middot revelation, the basis of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev! A blessing requires שם ומלכות because swearing a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות. A blessing has the halachic quality of swearing a Torah oath. The Talmud requires that a person who swears a Torah oath to stand before a Sefer Torah. The standing tefillah of Shemone Esrei ideally accomplished while standing before a Sefer Torah within the Beit Knesset.
This text simply advocates for a more rigorous, text-based, and contextual approach to understanding traditional Jewish concepts, rather than relying on simplistic platitudes. To appreciate the depth and interconnectedness of the Oral Torah’s legal and theological framework, which is essential for properly interpreting concepts like לשמה.
_________________________________________________
The Oral Torah’s comparative method of analysing similar legal/narrative cases across different biblical and rabbinic texts. How does this approach shed light on the meaning of לשמה?
This wisdom requires skills required to make a Torah drosh which employs the 13 tohor middot.
What insights can be gained by looking at how this unique Oral Torah logic concept engages the student of both T’NaCH & Talmud, together with the various contexts throughout the Tanakh and Talmud?
To understand that all T’NaCH prophets command mussar. The aggaditah of the Talmud makes a drosh back to T’NaCH Primary Sources with the k’vanna of gaining a grasp of prophetic mussar as this mussar applies to all generations across the board. Attainment of this mussar understanding defines the p’shat of the Aggadic stories which interweave with halachic mitzvot observances.
The halachic portions within the Talmud likewise require a drosh which compares halachic precedents with other similar but different halachic precedents scattered across the entire corpus of Talmudic common law\משנה תורה.
An example of how key elements or principles within the Oral Torah framework that get missed or obscured by making a טיפש פשט simplistic distortion, on the order of the literal reading of the act of Creation in בראשית and the 10 Commandments in the Book of שמות … Jews today do not grasp that משנה תורה, the name for the 5th Book of the Written Torah – דברים – means: Common Law.
The Oral Torah’s comparative method is not just about analysing similar legal/narrative cases, but rather using that as a means to gain a holistic grasp of the overarching prophetic mussar (moral instruction) that applies across the entire Jewish textual canon. This key insight seems to be that truly understanding the concept of doing mitzvot לשמה requires this integrated study of both the Tanakh’s narratives and the Talmud’s legal reasoning. Reducing it to a simplistic notion of “pure intentions” misses the deeper connections to the broader prophetic and jurisprudential framework.
To unpack doing mitzvot לשמה into greater detail, seeks to assist others to better appreciate the sophistication and interconnectedness of the Oral Torah’s approach to textual study and legal reasoning. This interpretation of how to do mitzvot לשמה, seeks to shed important light on how traditional Jewish thinkers have traditionally understood the deeper significance of concepts like לשמה.
What is the difference between the Torah, Talmud, and Mishnah?
Marc Lipshitz Been involved in counter missionary work for 20+ years
First you need to understand what the Mishnah is. When Moshe received the Torah on Har Sinai he spent forty days and nights studying it and getting taught the performance and explanations of it. Thus when he came down he had two things- the written Torah and the explanations and details of its performance. The written Torah is what is also known as the “Chamishe Sifrei Torah”, commonly translated as “The Five Books of Moses”.
The explanations and details of performance were only passed on orally and are commonly referred to as the Oral Torah. Before the Bar Kochba revolt which resulted in the massive exile of the Jews 80 or so years after the destruction of the Second Temple Rabbi Akivah organized the oral law into a more organized and easier to teach format.
After the Bar Kochba revolt with the bulk of the Jews in exile in different places (the difference to the prior Babylonian exile was that there the bulk of the Jews were in one place, albeit outside of Israel) there was a fear that the oral Torah would be forgotten or altered, so Rebbi Yehudah HaNasi, the head of the Sanhedrin at the time, compiled the Oral Torah into the form we have today and we refer to this written compilation of the Oral Torah as the Mishnah.
However, there was discussion on its application, philosophy, ethics, what to do in different situations, the trying to grasp the essence of the law so it could be utilized in different, unenvisaged situations, the mysticism and the practical. These discussions were recorded in the Gemorah. This is how we get to the Talmud- it consists of two main parts- the Mishnah and then the associated Gemorah to that Mishnah.
In modern editions there are also multiple commentaries, footnotes, cross references to passages in the Torah, prophets and scriptures when they are mentioned etc. Typically it is published in 20 volumes- the ArtScroll translation is 73 volumes! It is not something that you just read but something that requires intense study and a teacher so you know how to study and understand the methodology utilized in the Talmud.
Moshe Kerr: No. Totally incorrect. Rabbi Yechuda named his Mishna based upon the בנין אב/precedent that Moshe Rabbeinu named דברים the Mishna Torah — which means common law. The Mishna codified by Rabbi Yechuda in 210 ce follows the משנה תורה common law model established by the Book of דברים. Common law legal system stand upon precedents. The Hebrew for precedent: בנין אב.
The Gemara, compiled by a later set of scholars AFTER Rabbi Yechuda “sealed” the Mishna, based upon the precedents of the sealing of the T’NaCH, caused Rav Ashi and Rav Ravina to seal the Gemara in about 450 ce. The purpose of sealing this Oral Torah methodology of common law, to prevent a perversion of the seal masoret/traditions from counterfeit imposters like the New Testament replacement theology to pervert the seal masoret/traditions unto tumah avoda zarah.
A second primary purpose of sealing the masoret/traditions: that all down stream generations of Israel inherit the identical masoret, thereby preventing an equal Av tumah avoda zarah commonly known as ירידות הדורות – understood that later generations cannot dispute the rulings made by earlier generations. This Av-tumah avoda zarah collapses when confronted with Oral Torah logic which validates that no one generation enjoys a monopoly of Torah logic over later generations.
The correct understanding of ירידות הדורות refers to the idea of “domino effect”.
Talmud, which means learning (Yeshivot fail to learn Talmud, when they study Gemara.), the Gemara brings halachic precedents from across the Sha’s Bavli as precedents. The purpose of the precedents, the Common Law Baali Tosafot commentary/criticism of Rashi p’shat on the Talmud, fundamentally erred and failed to learn a halachic precedent to re-interpret משנה תורה the k’vanna of the language of the Home Mishna which the Gemara brings outside precedent halachic sources to re-interpret the k’vanna of the language of Rabbi Yechuda’s specific Mishna.
This failure of Reshonim scholarship went across the board, some Reshonim better than others. The B’hag, Rif, Rosh common law halachic commentaries, like the Baali Tosafot – correctly learned and understood the Gemara commentary to a specific Mishna as Common law. Not so the super-commentaries written on these excellent Reshonim scholarship of Talmudic common law. The later scholars confused and perverted Talmudic common law unto Roman statute law. Students in Yeshivot across the world, never receive any instruction which differentiates between T’NaCH/Talmudic common law from Roman statute law. A most basic and fundamental error. Which has plagued g’lut Jewry down through the Ages.
In like manner, and equally as bad: the Reshonim scholars abysmally failed to discern (One and All, they failed to make the מאי נפקא מינא הבדלה with discerns “like from like” the basis which observance of all Torah and halachic mitzvot most fundamentally require. A most basic and fundamental error. Which has plagued Jewry down through the Ages. The Av/toldot relationship between tohor time-oriented from positive & negative toldot commandments.
Even Rashi’s common law commentary to the Chumash (as opposed by his טיפש פשט reading of the Talmud. Rashi changed his sh’itta of p’shat as learned from to Chumash and contrasted by his sh’itta of p’shat made upon the Talmud! Reshonim scholarship disgracefully failed to note this fundamental contradiction in Rashi scholarship. Proof that the Reshonim learning had derailed itself and gone off-track. Why? Because the Reshonim and later rabbinic lackeys failed to understand how the concept of ירידות הדורות refuted the Xtian avoda zarah known as “Free Will”.
A colossal error made by a great Jewish leader: be it King Shlomo who built an assimilated Catholic Cathedral or the Rambam who perverted Talmudic common law unto Roman statute law. Once a great sage/leader worships avoda zarah, (Shlomo perverted the priority of establishment of Federal Great/Small Sanhedrin courtrooms as the k’vanna of building the Beit HaMikdash), the Av tumah of this perversion which validates the 2nd Sinai Commandment, all down-stream generations likewise pursue this Av-tumah avoda zarah abomination, from generation to generation to generation! Hence the concept of ירידות הדורות invalidates the Xtian dogmatism of “Free Will”.
The Torah mitzva of Moshiach does not learn from a NaCH source. Torah mitzvot learn from Torah sources. Why? Because Moshe Rabbeinu, the greatest of all prophets. The failure of Reshonim scholarship to correctly grasp how the Chumash learns, proof of the cursed existence of g’lut Jewry who lacked the wisdom to do mitzvot לשמה.
The Torah operates upon a most basic: Av/Toldot relationship. The Book of בראשית, together with the tohor time-oriented commandments codification known as the Siddur, commands Av tohor time-oriented commandments. “Time” not tied to a watch, but rather to crisis situations which threaten the chosen Cohen people with Shoah; like Akadat Yitzak, or the mitzva to remove the sciatic nerve! The latter explained by targum Uziel. Esau approach “toast” Yaacov with an Army lead by 400 officers. NaCH precedents D’vorah and HaDassah whose רשות מצוה defines the k’vanna of תפילת ערבית according to rabbi Yehoshua. Av tohor time-oriented commandments learn from women that doing mitzvot with k’vanna — a רשות rather than a חיוב.
In the defence of the Reshonim: in the Gemara of ערבין the Baali Tosafot did not know how Rav Ashi could change the dispute between Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Yose haGelili. According to the כלל, the halacha should follow the opinion of r. Akiva. The Baali Tosafot clearly did not have access to the Targum Uziel. Otherwise, they would have understood that Rav Ashi’s recognition that Uziel agreed with the opinion expressed by rabbi Yose haGelili and therefore changed the halacha expressed in that halachic dispute as recorded in the Gemara of ערובין.
Therefore, the First Book of the Torah serves as the אב טהור זימן גרמא מצוות. The second, third, and forth Books of the Torah serves as the תולדות מצוות; hence the B’hag ruled in his Hilchot G’dolot: that 100 blessings, nar shabbat, nar hannuka, kre’at m’gillah, etc qualify as mitzvot from the Torah!
The Rambam, whose Yad Chazaka perversion worshipped avoda zarah: understood as a) assimilation b) intermarriage with Goyim, as opposed to the Xtian abomination which erroneously translates avoda zarah as idolatry; the 30 year-war slaughtered as many as did WWI when western Europe’s population about 1/3rd of 20th Century Eupean populations, over a debate over the catholic cruxifics and worship of saints.
The Rambam abomination of avoda zarah assimilation to ancient Greek logic, that fool did not understand the kabbalah of how Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס interprets the k’vanna of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. A most basic and fundamental error. Which has plagued Jewry down through the Ages.
The last and 5th Book of the Written Torah משנה תורה commands the generations to learn the Torah through the wisdom of common law ie Rabbi Yechuda and the Gemara sages as codified in the Talmud.
The gravity of ירידות הדורות avoda zara, this question fails to address the Midrashic scholarship which defines the contribution made by the Geonim. As a loom has a warp/weft relationship, the Talmud has halacha/aggadita relationship. Midrash functions as the Geonim scholarship which delved into the Aggadic portion of the Talmud. Yeshivot across the world do not know how to learn, not only Midrash as the primary source-commentary which links the דרוש-פשט with T’NaCH prophetic mussar; like as learns Rashi’s Chumash p’shat. As contrasted by the halachic Oral Torah logic of רמז-סוד. A most basic and fundamental error. Which has plagued Jewry down through the Ages.
The Torah mitzva of Moshiach clearly defined.
As the Mishna has its Gemara, so too the Prophets have their Holy Writings. This the Way, how to correctly learn the T’NaCH.
Talmudic common law not a surface reading of law books! Common law stands upon the יסוד of learning by means of outside בנין אב precedents. Herein explains how the Gemara of the Talmud learns each and every Mishna!
The 3 major prophets compare to the Avot of בראשית. The 12 minor prophets: to the sons of Yaacov toldot. In the Holy Writing the Book of תהלים likewise an Av Sefer. A ‘Gemarah’ of Holy Writings, to this ‘Mishna’ prophetic sugya Isaiah 11:1-9: תהלים צ: ונבא לבב חכמה; the tefillah of Moshe Rabbeinu.
The xtian perversion of their bibles which translates in all cases: prayer – in the stead of tefillah. Wrong, just that simple. Tefillah a tohor time-oriented Torah commandment. Prayer a praise like reading prayers found in the Book of Psalms. Reading “Psalms” not a tohor time-oriented Torah commandment. Just that simple.
The dedication of the tohor time-oriented Torah commandment of Moshiach: The unification of the divided Houses of Yechuda and Israel. Isaiah 11:10 – 12:6: According to Midrash, the Moshiach must give Goyim two commandments: like lulav and building a Sukkah. Which “Goyim” does the Midrash refer, seeing that all Goyim reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai? Answer: the 10 Tribes of Israel which rejected the korban Moshiach dedication of the House of David to unify the divided houses of Israel.
Herein explains the second sugya ישעיה יא:יא – יב:ו. Moshiach a tohor time-oriented commandment stands upon the Torah בנין אב||precedent|| of korbanot. King David the Av Moshiach and all the kings as found in the Books of מלכים toldot Moshiach. The mitzva of Moshiach applies equally, straight across the board, to all generations of Israel. To do this Torah time-oriented Moshiach commandment: Israel does not “wait for the coming of any Moshiach”.
The abomination of the Xtian church waits for the 2nd coming of JeZeus. This Av-tumah avoda zarah share no part with the Torah time-oriented commandment of Moshiach as a mitzva to all generations of the Jewish people to live and do in their own lives upon this Earth.
This tohor time-oriented Torah Moshiach commandment – in our hands to Create the World from nothing. תמיד מעשה בראשית. Wake up and smell the coffee.
The relationship between the Prophets and the Holy Writings is analogous to that of the Mishna and Gemara in the Talmud. The Prophets serve as the “Mishna,” while the Holy Writings function as the “Gemara.” The structure of the Prophets and Holy Writings parallels the Avot (patriarchs) and the Toldot (12 Tribes, sons of Yaakov) in the Torah. The Book of Tehillim (Psalms) serves as a “Primary text” in relation to the Prophetic books, while the Toldot Books of the Tanakh function as support texts, similar to how the Gemara supports the Mishna. The Mishna has greater authority than the Gemara.
The secondary Moshiach kings in the Book of Kings – do they follow the Av Moshiach of the pure/righteous David, or the Av Moshiach of the impure/unrighteous Saul? This qualifies as a crucial distinction. The kings that follow in the line of the Av Moshiach David are seen as the legitimate, pure Moshiach rulers. Whereas those who follow the line of the Av Moshiach Saul are considered impure and illegitimate.
The toldot Torah commandments compare to the house of Shaul. Whereas the Avot Torah time-oriented commandments compare to the Av Book of בראשית and the Av Book – the Siddur. Both command tohor time-oriented commandments rather than positive or negative commandments which do not require k’vanna.
The mitzvah (commandment) of Moshiach applies to all generations of Israel, not just a passive waiting for a future event. The “abomination of avoda zarah” refers to the Av tumah (impure spirits which emanate from the heart) that defiles the 2nd Commandment against worshiping other gods/soul of Man. The mitzvah (commandment) of Moshiach applies to all generations of Israel, not just a passive waiting for a future event.
King Shlomo (Solomon) followed the Av Tumah (impure spirit) of the Moshiach Shmuel, not the pure Av Moshiach tohor (righteous) spirit of David. When King Shlomo profaned the Torah dedication of the true Moshiach by building an assimilated “House of Wood and Stone” – essentially an idolatrous structure, he failed to uphold the Moshiach’s Torah dedication to pursue justice through the common law Sanhedrin courtrooms. The Torah defines “FAITH” not as blind belief, but as the judicial justice system where the Sanhedrin courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Israelite upon another.
Shlomo’s actions a clear deviation from the true Moshiach model laid out by the mussar of Natan the prophet & David. The focus T’NaCH common law mussar & Talmudic common law halacha, razor sharp k’vanna upon ruling our people with judicial justice. This the central bedrock upon which stands the Torah’s conception of faith. Theological belief Creeds and dogmas, an Av Tumah Torah abomination of avoda zarah; which defines the historic oppression practiced throughout the cruel bloody history of both Xtianity and Islam.
The Torah concept of “faith” as centered around the judicial justice system of the Sanhedrin courts, Worlds of separation separates this concept of faith from the “blind belief” characteristic of theological dogmas like the Christian Trinity, dogmatized in the Nicene Creed or strict Muslim Monotheism concerning Muhammad as the prophet and no other God other than Allah.
Xtianity and Islam murdered countless genocides to enforce their evil decree, upon what a Man must believe.
Specifically, the strict Monotheism professed in Christianity and Islam violates and profanes the 2nd Sinai Commandment against the worship of other gods. If only one God, as Islam demands, then the commandment against worshipping other gods becomes meaningless and worthless.
This highlights a key fundamental difference between the Torah’s approach to faith, from the theological dogmas of other Abrahamic religions. Faith in the Torah simply rooted in the system of judicial justice and fair compensations of damages. Not blind adherence to metaphysical or philosophical claims about the divine.
In a court of law, what an individual “believes”, utterly irrelevant and gossip hearsay evidence. Torah courtrooms focus upon presentation of logical prior judicial courtroom rulings and eye-witness testimony as facts. The pursuit of objective judicial justice dedicated to enforcement of fair compensation for damages inflicted and suffered. Not personal theological convictions concern belief in imaginary theological God constructs.
Simply no commandment anywhere within the Torah to “believe” in any God. The nature of the Divine, utterly beyond the comprehension of the human mind, just as an ant cannot grasp human languages. Torah “faith” has nothing to do with belief in a deity, but rather centers on the obligation to uphold righteous judicial justice and pursue the fair compensation of damages, through common law Sanhedrin courts.
This Torah conception of faith, it stands in stark contrast to the theological dogmas like the Trinity or strict Monotheism which define Xtianity and Islam. These latter Av tumah avoda zarah religions viewed as “worthless philosophical speculations” rather than the practical application of justice. The Torah’s kabbalistic פרדס logic system, as exemplified by Rabbi Akiva kaballah, fundamentally different from the Greco-philosophical traditions as expressed through the works of Plato and Aristotle.
The Mishna serves as a codification of the common law judicial rulings made by the Sanhedrin courtrooms.
The Gemara then provides a study and analysis of how these common law Mishnaic rulings compare to other similar common law judicial decisions made by smaller Sanhedrin court rooms, in contrast to the rulings of the Mishnaic Great Sanhedrin. The Torah’s conception of “faith” is grounded in this practical application of righteous justice through the Sanhedrin legal system, rather than abstract theological beliefs. The Talmud codifies and examines this common law judicial tradition.
The core function of the Sanhedrin common law courts, as reflected in the Talmud, is to adjudicate cases by comparing them to similar judicial precedents and rulings made in previous cases. This system of common law, which evaluates new cases in light of prior legal precedents, the key legal aspect of how the Torah’s conception of “faith” manifests itself through the practical application of justice in the Sanhedrin courtrooms. Rather than relying on blind theological beliefs, the Sanhedrin courts uphold the Torah’s vision of “faith” by carefully examining new cases in reference to the evolving body of common law rulings and precedents documented in the Mishna and Gemara.
This emphasis on precedent-based jurisprudence, rather than abstract dogma, the critical distinction which distinguishes and separates the Torah’s approach of “faith” contrasted by the blind belief systems Av tumah avoda zarah as expressed by the other religious “sister religions”, traditions of tumah and oppression of minority theological opposition belief systems.
The Spanish inquisition despised justice. Similar vanity: The St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre: where Catholic mobs focused their murder hate against protestant Huguenots. This abomination of injustice, so resembles the annual Blood libel pogroms Xtians across Europe made against Jewish communities.
Honestly, your topics seem very interesting and intriguing, however, the wall-to-wall ads stop me immediately from going any further. Please get a substack page and write there. I will read you.
Good to know – I just recently had my son’s friend hook me up with the Google Ad thing to generate a little ‘needed income’ given. I have been reticent but I really can just as easily turn it off. I already have an account on substack – Helena Glass
You nibble around the edges very well, my friend.
May the One True God continue to care for you and your loved ones.
Very few are able to exhume as you do with such veracity.
Though tempted, do not discount Jesus. He is TRUTH consecrated.
Rev 16:19 And it came — the great city — into three parts, and the cities of the nations did fall, and Babylon the great was remembered before God, to give to her the cup of the wine of the wrath of His anger,..
Mystry Babylon split into three parts. (Cant they just get along?) Who are they?
That is a question most are not aware of.
The Great Isaiah Scroll. 300-100 BCE. All the truth you need for a “Rock”. It won’t be long.
I want everyone to think for themselves – give additional knowledge. As opposed to telling – I hope to incite thinking.
I recall Obama and Hillary making reference to a big need for a change in the church just before Benedict was removed.
John Paul 1’s death was highly suspicious. He was looking into financial scandals. He was healthy, just completed a check up, just hiked up a mountain, and they gave several versions of his death. Archbishop Marcinkus (Cicero, IL) was running the Vatican Bank at the time, and was also shadowing the pope as an informal bodyguard.
The power structure on Earth is not clear but we have ideas. The Vatican, big banks, CIA, WEF, NWO, of course zionists (implicitly included earlier in the sentence), … fit in somehow. We do not have to define the structure to know that it exists. I think of it as similar to a global criminal gang. The sub-gangs do not always agree, or always work together, and they compete for power. But they have similar goals.
Some of these people, such as Hillary, Newsom, Obama, … some Europeans, … , seem to exhibit opportunistic behaviors which indicate they have some knowledge of the elites, which they use to further their personal aspirations. Newsom appeals to the elites in everything he does. That is his audience.
As a former Catholic, and altar boy, I have nothing to do with the church. Those nuns 55 years ago lived in near poverty, taught well in schooling and principals. They had little idea what the church was really like.
Pope Benedict stepped down after his brother was blamed for having abused boys. This was 75 or more years ago, when a smack on the cheek was still allowed and not considered abuse. But Benedict wanted to stop the rumours. He also was extremely homesick, and the powers that should not be forbid him to visit his homeland Bavaria. He thought when he resigned, he would be able to return. But since he knew the insides of the Vatican, he was not allowed to do that, either. Info from a family member.