Venezuela Coup – Fighting Socialism with Socialism…

In Venezuela, the opposition is being portrayed as the victim, poor people, starving people, people subjected to a corrupt government just wanting justice!

But that’s the media portrayal. In reality, what is happening is much like the protests in the US against the police, against conservatives, against authority of any kind.   It manifests in violence, destruction, and deaths, all in the frame of the oppressed opposition.

The media like to parlay the source of the oppression as Maduro’s Socialist government, denouncing the failure of socialism and utilizing Venezuela as a prime example.   But whoa their cowboy – apparently Obama instituted sanctions against Venezuela because the President was ‘blocking these peaceful opposition demonstrations/protests, thus hampering the human right of ‘freedom of speech’.  Sound familiar?

These peaceful ‘opposition’ people have created anarchy stoked by support from the US dating back to the early 2000’s when an attempted coup supported by Henrique Capriles and the US backfired thus further damaging any relationship the US might have had. Instead of allowing a country to maintain its sovereignty, its own form of government, its own political agenda, the globalists wanted control. And internal destruction was determined to be the best means toward that end.

What is happening now is not unlike Syria, Egypt, Yemen, Libya, or Ukraine.  Certainly human rights have absolutely nothing to do with anything, otherwise we’d have sanctioned Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, UAE, etc…   Right?   But we haven’t because they are willing to trade with the US – Venezuela was not. And in a tit-for-tat parlor game, Obama declared Venezuela a ‘direct threat to the US’, which allowed him to institute sanctions.

Regime change is a globalist agenda. And apparently, any country that doesn’t play along – is destroyed.  was Venezuela a direct threat to the US?  NO!

When the globalists sought to destroy the economy of Russia, Putin developed alliances that threatened and destabilized the agenda. Venezuela was one such alliance as was Syria and Ukraine.  Hence the game board was expanded.

News site after site continually sides with the Venezuelan anarchists claiming that the utilization of force is necessary, channeling anger is necessary, strategic defense is necessary – knowing the end goal is a civil war. Sound familiar? It is the same strategy used in the US protests, the same sympathy, the same instigation.

Inside a Venezuela news site, the story is slightly different:   At a ‘pro-government’ rally, a sniper shot and killed 2 government workers and injured 3 more. Protestors in Lara besieged the town with homemade explosives and set fire to the town hall. In addition they ransacked a government food warehouse stealing 40 tons of food.

In Caracas the opposition shut down the highway with burning barricades of tires, tubes, rails, fences and vehicles. They broke into the Ministry of Transportation depot and caused over $430,000 worth of damage.

The list goes on and on, and despite the government’s call for dialogue, the organizations backing the ‘opposition’ continue to call for chaos, destruction, and anarchy. Who is making the call?   An organization called MUD.

MUD is a coalition of different parties including Social Democracy, Progressivism, Laborism, Liberlaism, Green and Humanism. Basically they all represent Secular Progressive Socialism.  

But wait – isn’t that what they claim they are fighting in Chavez-Maduro? The answer is…. Yes.

The Secular Socialist and Humanists aligned with Capriles as their prop and backed by the US/Soros cabal, want to oust the Socialist government of Maduro who follows the religious teachings of an Indian guru Hinduist because the Socialist policies of the Socialist government need to be replaced with Socialism that is more social and progressive – to er, them, the other Socialists.

Got it!

What are they smoking?

And the US, which is ridiculing the Maduro Socialist government as being evidence of the failure of Socialism, is backing the Secular Socialist Opposition party… because those Socialists would give the Soros cabal all the mineral rights currently nationalized by Maduro. Pinky swear.

The economic stranglehold imposed by Obama had one goal, control of Venezuela. Once accomplished, the US/EU ‘favorite’ Capriles would assume office, oil would be privatized, meaning sold to US and EU oil companies at a fraction of the cost, other abundant resources would be tapped and the country would be powered by the shadow government.   Of course, like all coups, there would be casualties… Hillary…Hillary… remember?   Civilian casualties are a normal part of war.

These ‘other resources’ are quite interesting. Not everything is always just about oil.   Venezuela is also abundant in; natural gas, diamonds, gold, and bauxite, which they have yet to tap with much significance.  

FYI – Lest anyone has forgotten how it is done: shortly after the Ukraine coup, a little known company called Burisma Holdings was suddenly in the news given that Hunter Biden was nominated to the executive board and production miraculously took off! After the Haiti relief effort began, Hillary’s brother was given the rights to their largest gold mine.

Venezuela? Who wants what?

Marine Le Pen: Battered By CRIF?

Marin Le Pen was bloodied by the media for her remark that “France” was not responsible for the roundup of Jews during WWII, it was, ‘those in power’.   It is similar to the defense we use in the US for gun ownership, ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’. A gun is a tool – just as France was a tool.

It echoes the recent attempts to blame an entire country and all it’s people in the present for the crimes committed by ‘people’ decades, hundreds – if not thousands of years ago.   It would be like putting every American citizen on trial for the crimes of the Puritans. Or, putting all the American Indians on trail for the rapes and scalpings of white men, women, children hundreds of years ago.

Therefore, Le Pen’s statement that ‘France’ is not to blame today for the crimes committed by those in power during WWII – is absolutely, correct.

As such, Jewish commentators should be careful in rallying the French Jews behind Macron based on the idea that Le Pen is now somehow a ‘Holocaust denier’. Broad Jump!

Today, a Townhall commentator has decried that Le Pen will treat all Jews like the Muslims and therefore they should place their vote with Macron. The source of the Le Pen denouncement would seem to come from CRIF;   Conseil Représentatif des Institutions juives de France.

So what is CRIF?

1976 to 1982, Alain de Rothschild was President of CRIF.

From 2001 to 2007, and again from 2013 to 2016, Roger Cukierman served as the President at CRIF. Prior to that he worked for the Edmond de Rothschild Group and for the Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild.

What can be deduced is that the Jewish media cry for Macron, who was also a former ‘employee’ of Rothschild, and the denouncement of Le Pen, is all built on the Rothschild agenda advocating globalization, world power, and a Socialist/Communist regime change utilizing puppet governments.

European  media outlets are blustering over a comment made by Rabbi Lazar during a FSU conference.  It is important to understand the context of Rabbi Lazar’s statement in which he advises Jews to leave France if Le Pen is elected. In 2015, Benjamin Netanyahu made the same plea, calling for France’s Jews to come home after three days of Islamist attacks. The point?  France has the largest Muslim population of any country in Europe.  France is NOT a safe haven for Jews as a direct result of the massive Islamist extremism that has punctuated there.

Given that Le Pen vows to crack down on immigration, crime and extremist attacks inside France, a new spate may erupt in defiance.   While Macron’s stance is a rather pathetic, ‘”well they are here to stay, terrorism is just a part of life now, live with it”, philosophy, Le Pen does not want to play dead.  As such she is vowing to secure France from Islamic extremism which should be a Halleluja for the Jewish population.

When Netanyahu was making the plea, their was no National Front in power, it was Hollande, the Socialist do nothing.   It is Rothschild and Soros pushing for a Macron win, attempting to twist the leverage through manipulation of the Aliyah or Exodus that has been instituted and called for since 2014.

The Times of Israel offers a different perspective which shows that many French Jews are reluctant to publically announce their preference for Le Pen for fear of reprisal or backlash. Instead, they keep their opinions private and vote their conscious. A similar phenomena occurred in the US leaving the pollsters quaking in their boots as all their fine algorithms proved worthless after a Trump win.

As such, it would behoove the French to investigate the sources of the pro-Macron propaganda, such as CRIF.  And I suppose if Le Pen does win, it will all be a Russian plot…

FYI:   The left leaning Liberals decry the fact that Le Pen would limit Jews from wearing Kippahs… however crosses, kippahs and Hijabs have already been banned in France’s public schools since 2004. Where was the Indignation? Funny, there was no Jewish response, only Muslim outrage.

Soros Losing Hungary and Macedonia?

A diehard Socialist, Jean Claude Juncker of the EU Commission is backing Macron’s bid for President of France. Juncker was named President of the EU Commission in 2014 after facing off 4 other “Socialists” from: The Socialist Party, The Liberal Party, The European Left, and The Green Party. Talk about a stacked deck?

It was Soros Heaven.

Hungary is attempting to shut down the Soros funded universities and this week Junker and Soros will discuss this newest anti-Soros blockade while threatening to press legal charges.

The spin, as reported by Reuter’s, is that Hungary’s Prime Minister, Orban, is a dictator with ‘authoritarian tendencies’ whose policies run contrary to the values of the EU.

Their biggest fear? That the rule of order will align with Russia and alienate Soros further from control toward the power shift of Globalization and by default a world monarchy.

Soros has already been defeated by the election of Trump instead of Hillary, by BREXIT, and now with Marine Le Pen battling the Soros favorite, Macron.  Any further spears, could send the Soros cabal reeling.   Macedonia and Hungary now sit at the helm.

Macedonia is currently fighting the Open Society takeover of its nation through regime change in collaboration with USAID during the Obama tenure. Further escalated by the release of a report by the European Commission in which they illegally wiretapped the Macedonia Government and claim that their investigation uncovered fraud, corruption, abuse of power, electoral fraud, blackmail, extortion and a host of other crimes.

The purpose? To oust the conservative government, label them corrupt, intervene in a regime change, and institute the preferred Socialist candidate vetted by Soros, Zoran Zaev.

Of course that’s not exactly the position the New York Times took in their evaluation of the political unrest. They favor Socialism.  No surprise there.

At the center of the dispute in Macedonia is a desire to end the Nationalist political and People system and replace it with a government more aligned with the EU’s Socialism project, as well as possibly ‘reunify’ Albania and Macedonia as one nation… Albania is predominantly Muslim and Macedonia is predominantly Christian.

At the helm of Macedonia as of January this year, a massive anti-Soros campaign was initiated.

Soros is desperate to regain control of the European Union as his refugee plan backfired and more nations are looking to back out of the crisis while acknowledging that Soros is at the center of the chaos.  In addition, sovereignty is becoming the new populist movement.

Orban, Hungary’s Prime Minister, has evolved from an interesting background. Given a scholarship to Oxford by Soros, initially a Communist sympathizer, later a Socialist, and then most recently he is depicted as a Nationalist and compared to Marin Le Pen and Donald Trump. Within this evolution, he gained the disapproval of Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and the Obama administration who now label him as a Dictator. and want him ousted.

Orban has been demonized by the media since his Nationalist agenda, and like Trump, the call for his assassination has been tendered. Attempts to discredit Orban include accusations that he is being blackmailed by Russia… sound familiar?

The Soros propaganda is wholly lacking in creativity citing the same monotonous accusations against whomever opposes his regime.  And like the protests in the US, his form of revolution is being deployed across the world.  Nip it in the bud!

And so now, with Macedonia and Hungary fighting for their sovereignty, their life, Soros has demanded that the EU Commission intervene and stoke the concept of Dictatorships which disallow his agenda of Socialist takeovers and Muslim immigration. Will he take the next step and create internal chaos? Protests? Civil War?

Where Soros goes, chaos follows.

Russia’s Election Meddling – Revealed!

This is funny!

A ‘think tank’ controlled by a ‘Russian Official”, appointed by Putin, hatched a plan to increase Trump’s chances of winning the Presidential election. This information was given to Reuters by ‘Three Current and Four Past Unnamed Officials’ .  

And how did this mind manipulation, interventionionist, master-minded intelligentsia come to fruition?

The plot involved having a ‘news outlet’ say that the smart choice for a President would be to have someone softer on Russia. … WOW! Now that is definitely a very toxic plot – how dare a media outlet make such an insidious flaming propaganda statement that would not be in line with Hillary!   Must be a very very sinister PLOT.

But then, according to these ‘unnamed officials’, the plot wasn’t working and Hillary was gaining a lead so they had to hatch a new plot in October, just weeks before the election. So all the brightest of the brightest intelligentsia got together and decided – to sway the news to include the possibility of voter fraud, and Clinton’s gnarly ‘reputation’.  How dastardly!  No one would have ever considered doing such a thing in the mainstream media, especially given they were told exactly what to write!

Oh my! How perverse, how spectacular, imagine the IQ that went into such an aberrant manipulation of our voting mechanism that involved the media and alternate news…? How dare they! 

Of course, according to theses shadowy unnamed officials, the media that the Kremlin employed was their own, “RT”, which doesn’t air on any channels in the US, is not well known in the US, and does not exactly have a massive US audience. But those details don’t matter. Instead, the master-minds of intelligentsia have their ruffles unfurled at the very notion that a foreign media would not be producing the information that they dictate!

How dare they!

So this is the extent of ‘evidentiary matter’ that has created such a colossal uproar throughout Washington and thus completely eradicated any possibility of simply ‘getting along’ with Russia and working together economically.

How much time has our esteemed Congress spent on analyzing the data? Reading and re-reading the headlines over and over again, trying to find some embedded code, something more viable, something sinister that could give credence to initiating WWIII, something worthy – to no avail.

What a waste of time and energy. This is why The Mainstream People, the MSP’s, are so colossally done with the government, the Swamp, and the Media. Of course, it is a given that the unnamed officials just might include such notable names as McCain, Lynch, Holder, Clinton, Carter, and Pelosi…

So, can we move on now and have Congress actually do something that benefits our country? I mean, we are paying their salaries, their pensions, their healthcare, their dental, their vacation pay, their holiday pay, their travel, their meals, their entertainment, their limousines, their private jets, their suits and ties and dresses and cologne. Shouldn’t they actually do something to earn their keep?


Tucker Carlson vs Caroline Heldman – 90% Tax Bracket

Professor Caroline Heldman was on Tucker Carlson advocating for much higher tax rates on the 1%ers, claiming that Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations were examples of what it meant to ‘pay their fair share’.  

Eisenhower: In 1954 the adjusted gross income of all tax returns amounted to about $229 billion, with a total tax liability of about $26.7 billion or roughly 9% tax revenue on all income.

In 2015, the IRS raked in $3.25 Trillion in tax revenue, of that $1.54 Trillion was individual income tax. Total payroll in 2015 was roughly $16 Trillion. That equates to roughly 9% tax on revenue. The same as during the Eisenhower administration.

So what is a fair share?

What is the current distribution of tax revenue? The top 1% of all income earners paid 45.7% of all federal income taxes, but earned 17.1% of all income in the U.S. The top 20% paid 83.9% of all federal income taxes, after earning 51.9% of all income in America. The middle 20% of income earners paid 5.9% of all federal income taxes, but earned 14.8% of all income.

During Eisenhower, the top tier tax rate applied to those making $400,000 which converts to about $3.622 million in today’s dollars. The problem is the fair sharers are using $390,000 as the 1% measure. That would equate to about $38,000 in 1950 which was taxed at roughly 48%.

But even this isn’t a fair measure because it doesn’t account for all the revenue that is diverted out of the US in order to avoid/evade tax.   Income concentration today is roughly the same as it was post The Great Depression in the 1920’s when most of the wealth was held by the top tier elites.   Taxing them to death is not going to create a ‘redistribution’ of wealth, it only means they will ‘evade’ further through tax havens.

Taxing the wealthy is rather simplistic. It doesn’t solve income disparity, it merely means the government is potentially wealthier, thus expanding their already burgeoning expenditures and welfare. In addition, Mz. Heldman failed to note the economic, political, and social courses of the Eisenhower administration.

His cabinet was dubbed ‘eight millionaires and a plumber’. His policies were geared toward the annihilation of communism, securing Iranian oil, threatening China, demanding Russia agree to a reduction of nuclear arms, massive infrastructure spending, fighting the far right GOP good ole boys, promoting technology development, thawing the Cold War, balancing the budget, and putting America First.

He wasn’t the best, made blunders, and had failures, but he had successes too.

That being said, Mz. Heldman’s view is certainly not of the caliber of someone whose education includes a PhD given it was driven without any statistics, proven analysis, or in-depth thinking and deserved the response she got from Carlson – a laugh.

Interestingly, Mz. Heldman has a number of bio’s that offer different accomplishments including co-founder of New Orleans Women’s Shelter, co-founder of critical Response, leadership position with Common Ground, co-founded End Rape on Campus, and more. Oddly; None of these organizations mention her by name as having anything to do with their leadership or founding…?

Her bio also states she wrote a book; The War On Women’s Bodies in 2016 – but oddly it doesn’t come up in any Google search?

Her Occidental bio also states she ‘co-authored’ the book, Rethinking Madame President, when in fact she ‘co-edited’ the book. Oops. It’s important to truthful.

France Election Meddling – Macron vs Le Pen

With baited breath the France election is descending quickly. Media outlets are earnestly promoting a Russian intervention in the process so as to declare the results invalid should Marine le Pen win. Macron is the groomed favorite created by Soros. Facebook complied with the Soros agenda and shut down over 30,000 accounts deemed ‘invalid or inappropriate’ by Soros standards so as to deflate the Le Pen avalanche. Somehow – that isn’t considered to be “Election Meddling”, instead it is called… Democratic Intervention.

Oh brother.

Election meddling has been going on for at least 70 years and its perpetrators have predominantly included the US, secondarily Russia, and thirdly China. As such the meddling denouncement loses its clout when Chicken Little screams – Fowl…

The first notable meddling came in 1948 when the CIA worked to overthrow the Communist government in Italy. Emboldened by their success, the practice became somewhat commonplace.   Sometimes it is subtle, and sometimes it has taken the form of assassinations, coups, and brutal civil wars – The Congo, Ukraine, Guatemala, and Indonesia, were particularly brutal resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Less brutal regime changes have been employed in Iran, Chile, Czechoslovakia, Nicaragua and even Israel.

Internally, voter fraud has surfaced in the US prompting investigations that reveal outright manipulation, trashing of ballots, faked ballots, illegal voters, and bussing of the elderly to vote twice and thrice.

As a cruel joke, the OSCE was established to oversee the election processes (in addition to their status as another global police) throughout the world and cry – Fowl if they felt something had gone – afoul.  Unfortunately, it would come to light that their nonpartisan – nonpolitical face was actually quite biased and eyebrows were raised. They are funded by 57 member states, and just love to fund their chosen party in elections around the world.

Revenues for 2015 totaled about $242 million Euros of which roughly 70% was allocated to employees and contractors salaries. A rather bloated agency that has no success in anything except gulping tax dollars.

Another monitoring organization is the National Democratic Institute, which is affiliated with the Democratic Party, the Socialist International and Liberal International. Not exactly non-partisan… It is a Socialist agenda funded by US tax dollars through the State Department and USAID.

There is the OAS, Organization of American States, which promotes globalization and works to fight human rights violations, promoting peace, fighting drugs and sustainable development in South America. I’d say – it wasn’t working too well: drug trade is now the most sustainable development and human rights are in the twalette.

There is the Council on Europe, another 1948 creation that has attained laugh status for it’s tenure in doing not much of anything albeit spending money. Headed by Thorbjorn, former PM of Norway, he had the dubious honor of electing Obama as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for his ‘promotion of dialogue in the Muslim world, and his reinstatement of START agreements with Russia’ which were actually in effect since the 1980’s and simply up for renewal.   He served as Vice President for Socialist International – the same affiliate of Madeleine Albright’s, National Democratic Institute.

No coincidence there.

Bottom line, it would appear that all the election overseers for Europe, the US, and South America are aligned with the Democrat Party of the US and Labour Party or Socialist Party of the EU. Seems somewhat of a coup; Mastermind Meddling Manipulation

So we now have The New York Times, CNN, NY Daily News, USA Today, Yahoo, Reuters, The Guardian, and the now infamous Soros portal – Deutsche Weld, all pointing to Russia for meddling in the upcoming French elections. Gee, Chicken Little – fear mongering, hysterical chaotic garbage mind manipulation is so passé.

Take a cue: The fable teaches the necessity for deductive reasoning and subsequent investigation.

Trump Tax Returns… Yawn

This whole tax return fiasco is rather mundane and would be considered a yawn except that Hollywooders feel obligated to contribute, fund and voice their witty opinions with regard to Trump’s tax returns.  

I don’t know, why don’t we just demand that every Hollywood elitist making over a million release their tax returns, and offshore account status? Maybe we should require all tax haven countries to release said data? Because, we’re paying their salaries, so we should have a right to know all their private data – right?

There is NO law that mandates any presidential candidate release their tax return. And it is a fairly nouveau concept that was initiated by of all people – Nixon, but it wasn’t voluntary, it came about as a result of the Watergate debacle as well as Agnew’s mess of bribery and fraud.

Reagan released one year and claimed it was an invasion of privacy. Gerald Ford didn’t release anything. And Bush and Cheney released partial pieces and synopses, although Bush’s showed heavy charitable contributions – upwards of 62%. The Clinton’s were vague, given they had numerous safe havens, the tax returns were not investigated.

However, what has been consistent with the Obama’s and Clinton’s is the vast wealth accumulated just prior, during and after their elections that eludes to the possibility of hidden or havened or manipulated reports of true income and assets. Lest we forget the bemoaning of Hillarygate as she claimed they were broke leaving the White House only to magically buy multi-million dollar properties and lavish in the bourgoise comfort of a sudden massive accumulation of wealth. Of course, we now know much was at the sweet bequest of the Saudi regime.

The major difference is that Trump is coming into the White House with massive wealth and thus his greed factor is considerably less motivated – for him, it is all about ‘legacy’.   Not the monetary legacy that is so prevalent among the mindset of Liberals, but the legacy of change and actually making things ‘better’. The historical legacy. And in that – privacy.

Hollywood should take note and comply with the law.   If they want to change the law, then we can discuss that option, but at this point they are whistling Dixie.   As I recall, Obama was asked to release his transcripts from college, which he adamantly refused to do despite the consensus that he had falsified his admissions, his source of ‘scholarship funding’, and his prowess as a student.

Alas, the Debra’s of the world don’t seem to think that is important. It is important to acknowledge that after Mz. Debra’s fame in the Will and Grace series, she has been ordained within a number of failed campaigns before her current role of sitting on the sidelines.

Bottom line, Messing is allowed her ‘opinion’, but so is everyone else that may or may not agree with her. The difference is that conservatives don’t tend to claim their opinion is the only one – and everyone else is an idiot or deplorable or uneducated or just stupid per the er, Amy Schumer intellectuals.

So while the whole tax return issue is interesting, privacy does prevail. Still, it would be interesting if we had access to all of the Hollywooder’s tax returns so that we could know if they are paying their fair share while we support their livelihood…and if they actually support charity to any extent, and if they are hiding income in offshore accounts because well, they don’t want to actually ‘pay taxes’ they just want to talk about – everyone else.

UN = Global Regulator/Police

The UN believes that migration ‘slows the aging process’.  But it’s not a fountain of youth, it’s a bizarre demographic concept that only the UN could create.

Because two thirds of the global population over 60 reside in under-developed countries, the UN believes that migrating the younger generation to developed countries will slow the aging process…   Of course, they admit that ultimately these young migrants will age to being over 60.

Who writes this stuff?

In the meantime, the UN states that these young migrants will buy houses, buy cars, contribute to capitalism and consumerism, and be a great lift to the developed world’s societies.   Per Dr. Phil – “How’s that workin’ out for ya?”   Because right now about 95% or more of immigrants in the EU and US are on welfare which simply drains society.

In addition, what happens to the countries that have lost their youth and now are supposed to survive with only their aged?   With no one to support them and with the loss of manpower, wages, and welfare contributors, those countries populations will simply die and leave a vast vacant country.

What the UN proposes is so immature in their evaluation one wonders the intellectual capacity of these members.   Undeterred, in 1982, the UN prepared a ’62 point ‘Vienna International Plan of Action on Aging’.   In 1991 they drafted 18 Entitlements for older people and in 1999 they created International Old People’s Day. And the Piece de Resistance, in 2002 they held a conference in Madrid where they created a new and improved resolution in which the well-being of older people was ‘recommended’.

I wonder how much this is costing… all these plans and conferences and recommendations?

I looked up the 4 day excursion/conference in Madrid and found that the UN didn’t do much of anything in 2002 so maybe that explains their obsession with aging.   Over the course of a year they held five conferences. By contrast, in 2005 they jetted about for 28 conferences to New York, Geneva, Paris, Thailand, Japan, Germany, Hong Kong, and the Grenadines where they discussed ‘decolonization’.  Grenada is a Commonwealth of Queen Elizabeth II.

By 2006, the UN was holding 52 conferences having elevated their significance and authority to such ideologies as world tourism, human rights, migration, climate control, regulating the internet, disarmament and so on.

Suffice it to say, the UN has grown into a global governance of everything without ever asking The People if they want this international police system.   Under Ban Ki Moon, the number of high ranking officials increased by 47% in New York and 27% elsewhere. The Secretary-General is the chief administrative officer of the United Nations. Although the Secretary-General is “appointed by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the Security Council,” Article 101 of the U.N. Charter grants him authority to appoint U.N. staff

In other words, it’s a good ole boys club that has no transparency, a huge budget paid for by member states (US picks up about 25% of the tab), and acts as the world’s Globalist Government without any People ever voting for ‘anyone’.  They are not required to reveal salaries and travel expenses, and pensions like normal bodies of government, they operate without any accountability, and we’ve been duped into accepting this massive power without even a peep…


Trump – Blackmail or Threats by NWO?

When something smells ‘fishy’ it is usually because it stinks!

In 2009, Soros gave an interview in which he claimed that in order to have a New World Order, the only way to bring China into it would be to put them at the helm. Or at least, have them think they were at the helm. Because China is only opposed if they are not the Holy Grail.

In 2016, Putin kicked out the Rothschild cabal from ever entering Russia again. Soros already had a Russian bounty on his head, but with the unmasking and proverbial boot given the Rothschild’s, Russia became a lost cause, albeit a source of vilification.

One of Soros major concerns in instituting the New World Order, was a Russia – China alliance that could disembowel the entire writings of the New World Order according to Garp. Dismantling that relationship could potentially take one of two forms;   1) vilify Russia to the point that a China relationship will hurt China’s economy, or 2) create a new relationship with China to lure it away from one with Russia.

With the election turning topsy-turvy on the Soros Cabal, vilifying and denigrating Trump wasn’t having the effect that they wanted. Trump’s anti-China and Pro-Russia stance had the ability to completely destroy decades upon decades of hard work. And then – suddenly We The People witness a dramatic change, a different Trump, and a flipped rhetoric.

What Happened?  

Suddenly, despite Trump’s previous adamant campaign proclamations, not only is China now our good buddy and Russia the arch villain, but the banking cabal of the Rothschild’s is upheld with Yellen remaining at the helm of the Federal Reserve.  OUCH!

Something happened.  Either Trump has been blackmailed – or he has been threatened. The New World Order has a way of finding the leverage it needs to accomplish it’s task whether it be simple assassination, or the gifting of a person’s ‘dreams’.   But coercion is an absolute.

For McCain that dream would appear to be a beautiful wealthy wife who would never divorce him no matter ‘what’ he might do. He is assured of the doting young thing and surrounded by wealth.

For Obama it was fame! He lavishes the limelight – book publications, Hollywood, television, center-stage these are his dreams – not his father…

With the about face of Trump, and his sudden lacking normal intensity, I would hypothesize that his blackmail was more of a threat of harm than a gift of his ‘dream’.   An Either – Or, scenario. The alligators came out of the Swamp.

It is worth noting that since that ‘Either-Or’ took effect, the media have been relatively silent, the frontpage bashing, the fifteen deplorable articles per page have been nearly eliminated and in some instances replaced with praises and pansies.     The ogre portrayals have lightened and even the evening news is light on Trump and heavy on world affairs.

Even the photos of Trump reflect a change, no longer is he raising Hell, he appears more like he is ready to cry. ;  as in he got – whooped.   Politico, a quite Liberal outlet is claiming he is Clintonian. And praise is lavished on Kushner, the same Kushner who went over Bannon’s head and called for the missile strikes on Syria and for more implications of Russian complicity.

Backing NATO, backing Yellen, backing China, vilifying Russia, bombing Syria, harboring Comey, and silent on charges against Obama and Hillary over the ‘eavesdropping’, all bear witness to the defeat of glory at the hands of an undeniable, indefinable ‘threat’.

While it feels eerily like The Body Snatchers, in reality, blackmail and/or threats are more the Swamp modus aperendi.  In the end – it does not bode well…