Tucker Carlson: The Serpent

Where did the Tucker assault come from?   Is Tucker a hack? Is he a loyalist?   What the Heck happened?

Psychology is filled with analysis to this regard, as such there are three psychological dynamics that lead to crossing ethical lines: First, there’s omnipotence: when someone feels so aggrandized and entitled that they believe the rules of decent behavior don’t apply to them. Second, we have cultural numbness: when others play along and gradually begin to accept and embody deviant norms. Finally, we see justified neglect: when people don’t speak up about ethical breaches because they are thinking of more immediate rewards such as staying on a good footing with the powerful.

When analyzing why Tucker Carlson suddenly quite inexplicably off the deep end of what was his entire television persona and attacked Sydney Powell, we witnessed – an actor.   And we were duped.

I am quite familiar with this particular personality disorder.   And yet, what is so amazing, is that there is NO lead up to the loss of control – the moment when they unveil themselves and think, ‘oh shit’.

Because, once unveiled, the veil cannot ever be redrawn.   Tucker Carlson – unfortunately for him – completely screwed up the idea that that veil could ever be reconstructed.   He has come out from behind the red cloth that veiled the ‘Wizard of Oz’ as a hoax, a cheap con man.

What an incredibly sad revelation.  

NO one likes betrayal.   It is certainly one of the worst sins. And yet it thrives.

The only reason it thrives is pure greed.   None of those who parlay to that extent of the bowels of society, do they have any pedigree left that could salvage them.   Carlson is a Catholic.   But I suggest the memes might disagree.

I was a supporter/follower.   I chose to ignore the obvious wig and try and focus on the wit!   I love Wit!   But I am eager to believe in the good, and wholly missed the actor.   A Star Is Born!   Hasn’t been the first time – and most likely won’t be the last, but I hold still to the harness that believing in good is essential to life. And so – I do.

There are good people and evil people and everything in between.   People justify their badness, and give sainthood to their goodness.   This is obviously common, we certainly wouldn’t wish for our own Hell?

Nonetheless, it is always a tragedy to lose another soul.   SO many –

On the other hand, it is good to know your enemy.   And they do themselves a losing battle in war when they give up their agenda before the fight. Somehow, despite all their global military expertise, they have lost every single battle against Trump.

Without exception.

Statistically – that is NOT possible.

But Carlson is not the first, nor the last neoconservative to file their horns. Dana Perino recently came out from the proverbial closet and revealed that yes, after working both the Clinton and Obama administrations, she is no more a republican than Greta…Climate Change Grumbler

IN a perfectly staged world of Soros, these actors would be groomed quite early, coached extensively on presentation, and taught how to say absolutely nothing while speaking for well over an hour – and leave your constituents breathless for more.

#1 – Be Pretty – whether male or female – appearance accounts for likely 80% or your votes.   Remember Nixon got ouched because the color of his shirt appeared gray on Black and White TV!   The color of his shirt lost him the election… as it goes.

We thought it was funny!

But it was brilliantly crafted.   Tedious number of years – at least 80 or 90, likely more.   It’s like the mantra of pregnancy, it took you nine months to get here physically, it will take at least nine months to get you back pre-pregnancy.   But if we’ve been gassed by a Swamp for 100 years, it’s a hard sell to convince people – hey we can get you back, but it will take 100 years….

Well heck, I’ll be dead, and maybe my kids!

I worked for a bunch of jerks, aeholes sometimes, blah-blah, but I was raised to see them, and reject them.   That’s what you do.   IN the real world, the harassment is far more perverse than simply a guy vs a girl.   But I realized early that it was simply the way it was.   When you grow up and this is your world – well then – this is your world.

Which makes the new divergence that much more scary.   How easily we will ultimately accommodate what is the Communist agenda.   Certainly, some would move underground, that is natural for every revolt.   But many would become “Karens” and sell their neighbor.   And when we watch the uprisings that led to Nazi Germany, there exist many similarities.’

I suppose, the ‘Karens’ are the hardest to ultimately digest. Your friend or neighbor selling you out knowing that that sale will cost you your life.   I’m sure I have many.

But I always thought it odd when someone would declare with such grievance, ‘how could they possibly’ – when referring to the Nazi’s.

And yet every military unit in the WORLD performs their duty according to the commands. Which may define killing all the inhabitants of another country.   But because it is done under the guise and tutelage of the word ‘Military’ – it has status that exempts it from religious or moral or ethical referendums…

I grew up indoctrinated within the belief that – 1.   there is good and bad.   2.   Good wins.   3.   We must fight to create a win.   4.   Doing nothing – conceives nothing.   Sitting around pointing a finger at the television, tossing a crushed 5th beer can into the hollows and burping with satisfaction does not have any productive value.

SO – World.   We The People ask – You The People – what is most important?   Freedom or Slavery?   How Much is your breakeven?   Obviously AOC has determined her breakeven is somewhere in the realm of $200,000 annually.   DO you really believe she will determine that is your – net entitled worth?   Or will it be closer to $10,000 annually – which is actually below welfare.

Ahhhh, the twisted world we do sow.   I can only watch, observe, and comment.   Such as it is.

CoVid19 – Biowarfare or Virus Engineering; The New Normal

Before Bill Gates and Fauci came screaming on the Corona Virus scene, virologists were all claiming the virus was man-made, ie genetically engineered.   And in fact acknowledge that genetic engineering or viruses is common. In fact, it is believed the intent of the engineering was to make people immune to all corona viruses.

In 2018, China claims to have created genetically engineered babies immune to HIV, smallpox and cholera by mutating the CCR5 gene so as to protect them from infection.     In January 2020, A single injection of a new gene therapy protected mice from the effects of sarin and other deadly chemical warfare agents for months.  Genetically manipulated viruses is – age old, common, universal, and not without risks….

Researchers in India stated that they found 4 inserts in the Corona Virus which are unique and not in any other coronavirus.   Those inserts are spike proteins found in HIV-1-gp120. Such inserts are unlikely to be a natural event.   The suggestion is that the virus was being genetically engineered as a biowarfare weapon while simultaneously China had developed a gene mutation process that would render their people immune.

In a biowarfare situation the implications are to eradicate a portion of society while assuring certain populations are immune.

The concept is hardly new.   The Zika virus was also suspect to be the result of genetically engineered mosquitoes.   Genetically altered foods are injected with viruses to alter their chemistry.   The concept was created to create vaccines for animals so as to reduce the death rate and increase available food proteins.

But then Bill Gates decided that same concept could be used for alternate purposes on humans – and the vaccine world went literally – bananas.

Early on in the virology discussions of CoVid, it was evident that the proof is in the virus itself: The tools for genetic insertion are still present as remnants in the genetic code. Since these unique gene sequences don’t occur by random chance. The conclusion was that the release of CoVid was likely accidental – although the research may have been either vaccine related or biowarfare related.   In the event it was biowarfare, it should be acknowledged that within the defense industry this means of warfare is the future for ALL countries.

Within the genetic engineering sphere of science, a pShuttle sequence is a common vector used for analysis.   The pShuttle leaves behind a unique code or fingerprint of the ‘genetic modification’ that can not be attributed to anything else.   Thus the 4 inserts as established by virologists early on in the release of CoVid.

So why was it so important to deny the facts? The Truth? Why did media after media report that the virus was a bat derivative?

Enter – Bill Gates.

He saw an opportunity and he launched his agenda.

Tucker Carlson recently interviewed a Hong Kong defector who claims that she has proof the virus was genetically engineered.   And despite the fact that this was the scientific analysis early in the chaos, the media and a host of unqualified ‘top scientists’ are now claiming otherwise.   Why?   Because Bill Gates needs the money.

And what this uneducated, marketing guru says, suddenly becomes Science.

When the information was released that the virus originated in China, damage control went into full gear. That meant deflecting blame from China to ‘bats’.   Despite every major news outlet being directed to recreate the cause and origins, the battle failed. And instead of acknowledging that China was conducting lab work in virus immunity, as ias every country in the world, they game sought to recreate truth – when truth would have likely been an easier battle.

Trillions of dollars had been invested in China.   They had more people to indoctrinate and vaccinate than a dollars could dream.   Sparing China became the targeted mantra, and in effect, became their downfall.   What to do… what to do?

Fabricate.   Instill a global chaos.   To protect the investments of the elite who coveted their money and had little value compassion for anyone outside their circle.

Once Pandora’s Box was opened, putting the insects back inside was not possible – and thus the powers were forced to create lies upon lies upon lies to protect their financial interests.

It is not unlike the bizarre media display of Biden whose obvious mental failures preclude any honest depiction – and yet they are stuck.   The Democrat train has no alternative other than to support a severely lapsed dementia patient, because they have no Plan B!

All this begs – the entire global elite with all their resources, money and control, could do nothing better…   perhaps because their elitism does not define their intellect or their Art of War.

And instead defines how far they are predisposed to self annihilism.

 

Tucker Carlson Meets A Socialist Narcissist.

A 30 year old Dutch Socialist author who writes books on Utopia and praises the same Ocasio-Cortez ideals including; income for all, a 15 hour work week, open borders, and the elimination of billionaires through wealth confiscation, secretly taped Tucker Carlson coming unhinged in a segment of an interview that was not aired.    He then took this unauthorized surreptitious tape and posted it on public media.  While doing so would not appear illegal, it certainly bears the same Democrat/Liberal agenda of ‘leaking to the press’.

Bregman apparently thought it would be very utopiesque to release the choreographed tape to John-Q public via Twitter.  It was an obvious pre-meditated sabotage in an attempt to discredit Carlson, and demonize his show.  Baited throughout the interview, Carlson lost it, and expelled a slew of expletives. He knows better, but sometimes in this bitter agenda of hatred, a person loses it.  And that would be the only excuse Carlson could offer.

Bregman accused Carlson of some hefty demons, including the fact that Carlson has accumulated wealth, pegged at $8 million, and wealth is evil.  And apparently, like Ocasio-Cortez, Bregman believes this accumulation justifies a beating with canes, lashes, chains, and anything he can find to support his ‘Utopian Society’ wherein everyone is living in Paradise.  That is, everyone as long as they support Communism.

Interestingly, despite having authored 4 books before the age of 30, and having been lauded with prominence and recognition for his Socialist ideology, little information can be garnered about Bregman other than his writing, there is nothing about his personal life, where he lives, his net worth, his salary, his taxes…, his friends, or funders.   In fact, it could be said that he is ‘hiding’, like Sanders, so as to not divulge that he himself is a possibly a millionaire worthy of a lashing, a cane, and a shrewing.

An Ocasio-Cortez documentary fetched $10 million.   How much did Bregman earn from his four books, or from his history as writing for The Washington Post, BBC, and De Correspondent?  I imagine it is a fair guess, that his grooming has catapulted him into the millionaire class that he so viciously berates.

But he is emphatically parallel in his visions of open borders and paradise lala land as is our own airhead, Ocasio-Cortez.

SO lets have some fun and just play a bit with the reality of numbers!

A 15 hour work week making $15 per hour which is far above the average in the EU which is roughly in the $9.50 range, would mean a person made $300 per week or $15,000 per year.  In that event, a house price on average would have to be in the range of $40,000, a car would have to sell for $2,500 or less, food prices would tank, gasoline prices would be about 50cents a gallon, the cost of a haircut, alcohol, clothes, children, and everything else would have to be $-0-.

If all these things cost $-0-, then manufacturing will dwindle, supply will evaporate and a depression will result that will require FDR to come to the rescue and raise taxes to pay for the freebies that aren’t available because everyone moved to another country.

It was only a few decades ago that the cabal sought to indoctrinate us with the pop music culture of The Beatles.  They espoused socialism, equality, open borders, love everyone… until they began to make money.   Suddenly, they were making songs about The Tax Man!   They were denouncing their British citizenship where taxes gouged the wealthy, and moving their wealth into havens, protected from the nasty Socialists.

Bregman and Ocasio are the recreation of John Lennon, but instead of making them the pop culture anihillists, they are making them the political pop culture in a last ditch effort to rebrand Communism as “Paradise”.  Using young newbiles seems to be the trend.

And given that our education system has tanked to such an extent, many a college graduate have the acumen of an eighth grader, and Ocasio and Bregman would seem to have such degrees.  They know nothing about the Bolsheviks, nothing about the reality of Communism as it has continuously played out in just the last 100 years, nor do they seem to have any finger in the Dyke of Society, how it works, how the well-oiled mechanizations come into a sort of ecological symbiosis.

The problem?

The John Lennon’s became republican as their wealth ricocheted.   Lennon was executed when he ‘supposedly threatened to expose the deep state’. And Hollywood vamped on – like deer in headlights, what???  Their own intellectual capacity caught between porn, sex addictions, drugs, and fried brain=cells.

So.  Did Tucker Carlson lose it?  Yes.   Can a person who is capable of seeing the log in their own eye recognize it as such?  That is debatable.   Even the best would seem to judge quite harshly when their own eye is bleeding.

And I personally know – many.

 

Slavery Never Existed.

Apparently historians have decided that history needs some editing, specifically during the time period in which Egyptian Pharaohs used ‘slaves’ to build the temples and pyramids. Historians have decided that this is all a myth, that they weren’t really ‘slaves’, they were free laborers, conscripts, who were paid a wage and needed the work.   The basis for this shift is in the term ‘conscript’.   It is not unlike obligatory military service wherein housing and meals are provided in return for labor. Another term used to identify the laborers who built the pyramids is – civil servant. And civil servants require a ‘strong government’ body to … force them into slave labor.

Hmmm.

Is this some weird way of heralding in Social-Communism?

Of course there is the fact that a conscript in the military is not free to leave, as this would be considered AWAL, and grounds for court marshal, the terminology is rather obliquely conveyed to serve a purpose, albeit a strange one.

The entire basis of this new conclusion is the fact that a dozen intact skeletons were found in a shaft constructed of mud and brick behind the Giza pyramids. According to this conclusive evidence, historians conjecture that if they were slaves they would not have been buried, and they had to have been pyramid builders because their grave was behind a pyramid.

YIMINEE.

Interesting logic, not for its conclusion but for its absolute immature irrational thinking process.

Oddly, this same logic would seem not to apply to black slaves in Europe and the US who were buried, many with headstones and inscriptions.   Should we then conclude that the slaves in Europe, the white slaves of the Barbary Coast, and all slaves of history were not really slaves, but simply civil servants, laborers?

A friend shared with me that a man who is of black, white and Hispanic heritage believes that all white men should pay remuneration to all black men because of past slavery.   Of course, given that this man is partially white, wouldn’t his white part have to thus pay all black men?   And if we apply his remuneration logic, wouldn’t his black part have to pay all European whites for their Barbary Coast slave trade?   And given that Spain was considered a pioneer of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, wouldn’t this man’s Hispanic heritage make him libel to his black heritage and all black men?

He’d go broke.

Of course all of this is on the heels of the new agenda in which all white men are brutalized as having ‘white privilege’ for which they must be made to suffer and curl into a ball of shame.    But shame isn’t the real agenda, the real agenda is redistribution of $$$$.   A stage is being set for a special white privilege tax to be levied, lawsuits to erupt, and chaos to ensue.

So let’s do what the historians have done regarding the Egyptian slavery – let’s simply redefine it as civil conscription, i.e. a necessary service in order to build agriculture which benefits everyone…

And women were not really property or chattel, they were laborers who were ‘persuaded’ to have more children so as to benefit society with their added labor and protection.

Problem solved!! Slavery never existed.

Tucker Carlson vs Caroline Heldman – 90% Tax Bracket

Professor Caroline Heldman was on Tucker Carlson advocating for much higher tax rates on the 1%ers, claiming that Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations were examples of what it meant to ‘pay their fair share’.  

Eisenhower: In 1954 the adjusted gross income of all tax returns amounted to about $229 billion, with a total tax liability of about $26.7 billion or roughly 9% tax revenue on all income.

In 2015, the IRS raked in $3.25 Trillion in tax revenue, of that $1.54 Trillion was individual income tax. Total payroll in 2015 was roughly $16 Trillion. That equates to roughly 9% tax on revenue. The same as during the Eisenhower administration.

So what is a fair share?

What is the current distribution of tax revenue? The top 1% of all income earners paid 45.7% of all federal income taxes, but earned 17.1% of all income in the U.S. The top 20% paid 83.9% of all federal income taxes, after earning 51.9% of all income in America. The middle 20% of income earners paid 5.9% of all federal income taxes, but earned 14.8% of all income.

During Eisenhower, the top tier tax rate applied to those making $400,000 which converts to about $3.622 million in today’s dollars. The problem is the fair sharers are using $390,000 as the 1% measure. That would equate to about $38,000 in 1950 which was taxed at roughly 48%.

But even this isn’t a fair measure because it doesn’t account for all the revenue that is diverted out of the US in order to avoid/evade tax.   Income concentration today is roughly the same as it was post The Great Depression in the 1920’s when most of the wealth was held by the top tier elites.   Taxing them to death is not going to create a ‘redistribution’ of wealth, it only means they will ‘evade’ further through tax havens.

Taxing the wealthy is rather simplistic. It doesn’t solve income disparity, it merely means the government is potentially wealthier, thus expanding their already burgeoning expenditures and welfare. In addition, Mz. Heldman failed to note the economic, political, and social courses of the Eisenhower administration.

His cabinet was dubbed ‘eight millionaires and a plumber’. His policies were geared toward the annihilation of communism, securing Iranian oil, threatening China, demanding Russia agree to a reduction of nuclear arms, massive infrastructure spending, fighting the far right GOP good ole boys, promoting technology development, thawing the Cold War, balancing the budget, and putting America First.

He wasn’t the best, made blunders, and had failures, but he had successes too.

That being said, Mz. Heldman’s view is certainly not of the caliber of someone whose education includes a PhD given it was driven without any statistics, proven analysis, or in-depth thinking and deserved the response she got from Carlson – a laugh.

Interestingly, Mz. Heldman has a number of bio’s that offer different accomplishments including co-founder of New Orleans Women’s Shelter, co-founder of critical Response, leadership position with Common Ground, co-founded End Rape on Campus, and more. Oddly; None of these organizations mention her by name as having anything to do with their leadership or founding…?

Her bio also states she wrote a book; The War On Women’s Bodies in 2016 – but oddly it doesn’t come up in any Google search?

Her Occidental bio also states she ‘co-authored’ the book, Rethinking Madame President, when in fact she ‘co-edited’ the book. Oops. It’s important to truthful.