BREXIT – UK Media Morality Police – Oxfam: A Linked Cabal Conspiracy 101

Under Sharia Law, morality police are tasked with enforcing religious obeyance, dress code enforcement, and the promotion of virtue.   Punishment varies by country and can range from public admonishment to jail time and torture.  

Facebook’s Zuckerberg is prowling the globe demanding morality policing of all social media platforms.  Under the UK government Department of Digital Culture of Media and Sport, the UK is the newest country to adopt censorship propaganda on behalf of the Cabal media.   The new White Paper outlines specific ‘codes of practice’ including child sex, revenge porn, sale of illegal goods and terrorist content.  But it is the ambiguous territory that is alarming:  harassment, hate crimes, trolling, fake news and disinformation.

And then there is this: “blocking harmful websites”.

What is Disinformation?  “False information spread to deliberately deceive”.   It originated in Russia and was coined by Joseph Stalin to reference – “manipulation of a nation’s intelligence system through the injection of credible, but misleading data”.

Interestingly, this campaign of ‘disinformation’ that was initially levied against Trump and Russia has now massively backfired putting a healthy number of Democrats and intelligence officials at risk of prosecution, according to Attorney General Barr.   While some pundits within the media consider the betrayal to have been perpetrated by a relatively small group of people, that statement is misleading and likely quite false.   In fact, it had to involve key intelligence agencies within the US government.

How quickly we forget:  In 2016 and 2017, a coordinated report put out by the major news outlets stated that 17 intelligence agencies confirmed the Russia collusion was real.   This statement was later corrected by two media outlets who stated that in fact it was only the FBI, NSA and CIA.   But if they confirmed as fact something that has since been proven to be wrong – the media and intelligence offices were spreading “Disinformation” and Propaganda.  Which should be censored according to Zuckerberg.  And the UK.

The total budget for these three agencies is roughly $33 billion, and the number of employees is around 65,000.  The Obamas and Clintons also quoted the false 17 number.  But the fact remains, these three agencies are the most prominent within the government and thus should be held to a higher accounting for their statements and spreading propaganda.

While Facebook has hired it’s own media morality police, the UK is considering two possibilities; some unknown unbiased watchdog, or Oxfam.  While finding an unbiased watchdog likely means a neoliberal Soros protégé, Oxfam is hardly above reproach.

Oxfam is a multinational NGO with a hefty log of criticisms with regard to its operations, political activity, charitable transparency, engorged executive salaries, and sexual misconduct allegations.   In 2011, Oxfam was accused of “being unduly influenced by the priorities of the media, of providing inaccurate information to the press (“stories featuring aid projects which often rely on dubious numbers provided by the organizations”) and of perpetuating negative stereotypes which “have the potential to influence policy”.

In January 2013, Oxfam was nominated for the Charity of the Year award at the British Muslim Awards. They didn’t win.  The British Muslim Awards is an annual award ceremony that honours the success and achievements of Britain’s Muslim individuals, groups and businesses, as in – Oxfam.

As usual, the Oxfam morality police considered by the UK are immoral, unethical, biased, prejudiced and have been accused of fulfilling one singular charitable need – its own existence.

Whether compared to the Sharia morality police or to Communist style censorship, the UK decision has been made as the news is flogged with BREXIT and other topics find no headline.  Perhaps I should qualify and rephrase, FAKEBREXIT.

The BREXIT that is and was and shall never be.

In a bold shift, Theresa May has pushed the delay until the end of the year while publically stating she will not resign until a deal is in place.    The announcement is in complete contradiction to her previous calls for a June deadline and her summer resignation.   The shift comes on the heels of meetings with both Merkel and Macron who are defacto spokespeople for the Socialist/Marxist Jean Claude Juncker and the UN.

The obvious collusion is likely further pressure from a Germany whose economic prosperity has taken a significant hit in the last two years.   The same Germany that has held the reins and implemented extensive Socialist/Marxist policies.   The same Germany that will be required to pick up the significant $$$$ slack that the UK exit would entail.   The same Germany that has systematically denied every single deal presented.

Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party is demanding an EU Union that is essentially a non-BREXIT and the Tories seem to think that keeping May alive in Parliament through the year will jeopardize their upcoming re-elections.  No one seems intent on making BREXIT – instead it has degraded to a political fist fight worthy of the Poroshenko government in Ukraine with brawls, screaming, fist fights, and aggressively foul language.

The alignment of the delay to coincide with the 2020 elections in the US is likely not coincidental.   Whether the UK structures shift further right or further left is the real stall point.  Given Theresa May’s rather left leaning conservatism, her resignation would open the door to more staunchly right aligned politicians and their ideologies, not to mention a clean BREXIT that could erode Labour and Socialism.

Whether it is BREXIT or morality police, the UK has crawled ever further into the black web of the cabal who are desperately trying to revive a failing cult club.  Censorship via Oxfam is so incredibly perverse, it highlights the degradation that the left, May, Merkel, Maurice le-Macaroon, and Juncker feverishly drool for as they exit left holding their Panama Paper tax haven certificates.

FYI:  Oxfam is one of the NGO’s aiding the migrant caravans targeting the US/Mexican border.   They have been vocal in demanding human rights protection for all migrants.  They have provided financial assistance to the migrants.  They have designated funds to support migrant rights organizations.  Oxfam is just one, albeit vastly powerful and highly funded, organization that partners with the Soros Open Society Foundation to create chaos in the US through massive “ILLEGAL”  immigration.

Is America Growing… or Declining Like Rome?

Is America growing or decling like Rome?

41BC, after the assassination of Julius Caesar, the Roman empire went through explosive growth. Why?

Caesar’s hand-picked successor was his nephew, Octavian. As most school children learn, Octavian attacked the renegade general Marc Antony, main squeeze of Cleopatra, took control of northern Africa and expanded his empire. But why was Egypt so important?

Octavian was named Augustus in 37BC,

but in that year, Rome had already sent 100 ships to the Red Sea. The Red Sea lanes gave the Romans a shortcut to the Arabian sea, Indian ocean and the Silk Road.

Silk wasn’t the only thing Rome imported from Asia,

though it was probably the most important. They also imported chemicals, (fragrances, embalming fluids, etc.) spices, ivory but most critical to Rome’s armies, steel.

For something to be important as an import, it must be either not available or expensive in the importer’s country, and this was especially true of silk and steel. To be sure, the Romans had silk, but to the Chinese, silk was the basis of much of their economy. After 2,000 years of minute advancements, they had refined the manufacturing process to the point where hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of Chinese laborers were cranking out thousands of tons per year of extremely high-quality fabric that no one else in the world could replicate.

In steel, the process was even more acute. 

Roman steel was largely wrought iron, which is a low carbon form, molded into shape by heating and beating. Its low carbon content made it weak, heavy and brittle. Chinese steel could be cast into forms that were flexible, lighter and did not as easily break.

For the Romans, though, what was most important was not steel or silk, but something hardly mentioned in the texts. Branch banking.

To an empire, what you want is not important; what’s important is what you can buy. Rome could never have conquered China and taken its silk and steel. They had to buy it and to do that; they had to not only have money but move it.

Regardless of how powerful a country is, shipping gold across the seas is dangerous and expensive. The Romans, like the Greeks and Jews, solved this by using their temples as banks. Banks took in deposits and issued notes, promises written on paper in lieu of gold. If a person wanted or needed gold, they could have it, just as one who needs cash can get it from a bank, but if they don’t need it, it stays in the bank in their account. This meant the Romans did not need to continually ship gold to finance trade or construction, two things that require large amounts of money.

The Romans protected their temples with armies,

which was why locals kept their money there, but the real beauty of the steel and silk trade was Rome’s ability to tax it. The import taxes on steel and silk were as high as 25%, and the cost of these in the empire was staggering. It’s been estimated that a single bolt of Chinese silk may have cost the equivalent of 8 years of Roman wages. This gave the Romans the ability to create something that didn’t exist in 37BC. A standing army financed by wages and not plunder. Plunder may be a cheap way to finance a war, but you must keep finding new plunder.

In many ways, Bill Clinton, unwittingly, became the Octavian of his time…

though Octavian was a general and Clinton a draft dodger. Clinton’s claim to fame, (or infamy, as it may turn out) was to set the banks free. By eliminating Glass-Steagall and changing banking regulations, he set in motion a chain of events that led us to where we are today. A nation with a mammoth military financed through taxing and borrowing against trade.

Is this good or bad for America?

Like the weather, this is impossible to predict. On the one hand, the US has borrowed rivers of money. On the other, that river has bought us quite a lot. Aside from too many houses too many bars and too many malls, America has something else no one seems to notice. A gargantuan university system.
In Roman times, all roads led to Rome. The same is true here. 9 of the top 10 universities in the world and 35 of the top 50 are in the USA. Of course, you can get an education from a book, but that’s hardly the point.

A few years back, I lived inside the triangle engulfed by three universities, Harvard, MIT, and Tufts.

If you think of these institutions as places you get an education, you’re missing half the story. Harvard college is small, but its graduate school is enormous. The same is true of MIT and Tufts. The level of research going on in this triangle is staggering, and if you think it’s because of “American exceptionalism,” think again. The top students in these universities, as well as many of the professors, are from nearly every country on earth. As my daughter aptly put it when I asked her how many of her classmates in chemistry class at Wellesley were American, she said, “Just me and Eileen.”
To put this in its true perspective, America has 1,400 colleges and universities. The amount of money flowing through is probably higher than the GDP of 80% of the world’s nations. The amount of research being produced is hard to fathom, much less control.

Our Universities may be on the cusp of replacing what for 20,000 years has defined nations. Resources.

They are close to making oil obsolete. The effect on the USA is hard to fathom. Even though the price of computing has fallen by a factor of 3,000 in the last 20 years, the prices of oil and coal, on inflation-adjusted terms, have barely budged in the last 80 years. As Bill Gates once said, if the cost of transportation fell as fast as the cost of computing, you’d be able to buy a jet for what it used to cost for a neck-tie.

This has led to a one to one relationship between energy use and GDP growth. Imagine if this ratio changed by a factor of not 3,000, but just two. Imagine going from using 100 million barrels per day of oil to 50 million? It’s almost impossible to fathom. An electric car uses one-fifth the fossil fuel a gas or diesel powered auto uses. The US has 250 million vehicles!

The same is true of farmland, copper, and steel. We may be within a couple of decades of a family being able to produce almost everything they need to eat in their basements using as much energy as is created by a couple of hours on an exercise bike. In just the last two years, seed technology has raised some crop yields by 20% using the same soil and less fertilizer. Vegetables can already be grown in warehouses and can compete on a price basis with those shipped in from Mexico and sold in Walmart.

We’re close to being able to diagnose illnesses with a cell phone and where you can make love with your spouse that is 3,000 miles away in a hotel bed. We’re a decade away from being able to sit in a room and have a conversation with Einstein and your long-deceased grandmother.

Why is this important? For all of our history, the world has been ruled by empires, from the Romans to the Ottomans, the Han to the Ming, the British Empire to the USA. Imagine a world where everything you need is at your fingertips. Imagine a world where Empires no longer matter.

Is the USA declining, or, as in the case of Dinosaurs, are we becoming smaller and more sustainable?

Catholic Church – Child Predators

The Catholic Church is embroiled in a pit of fire surrounding the ongoing, heinously sinful child sexual abuse that has permeated the Church for likely centuries.   This past weekend Pope Francis held a televised live broadcast in which the discussion of this rampant egregious deed was discussed.  And yet, the entire event came across more like an infomercial than a real self-evaluation repentant matter with constructive solutions.

1)   Survivors of abuse were ‘disallowed’ from entering the conference – it was a closed door event.

2)   Senior Cardinal Marx announced that files on abusers were destroyed.

3)   Pope Francis was aware of the atrocities and did virtually nothing to bring justice against his house of criminals.

How do these truthisms bring belief, faith, or hope that the Vatican is really serious about doing anything? Instead, it makes the entire conference look like a sham, a flim-flam media posture event.

Francis was installed as Pope, March 2013.  Over the last few decades there have been 2600 accusations against Priests in the US alone.  All of these allegations were transcribed, the offender was named, and a file created.   It would appear, the Church destroyed many files, meaning each successive Pope was aware of the allegation, and instead of bringing justice, they sought to destroy the evidence.  No evidence – no allegation – Priest cleared.

The conference was attended by just 200 participants…  mostly Bishops.    But in 2018, six Dioceses in Pennsylvania found these same Bishops were guilty of covering up evidence of Priests abusing upwards of 1,000 children.  So in essence, Pope Francis is putting these same morally convicted wolves in charge of guarding the chicken coup.  Obviously it has worked well in the past…

But even that knowledge doesn’t break the surface of corruption that was plagued the Church for ‘decades’, I would think it is more likely centuries.   In the late 2000’s, Pope Benedict XVI sanctioned Cardinal McCarrick of Washington DC for abuse allegations.  Two of the allegations remain ‘sealed’ from the public, others were destroyed.  And despite, the statement by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano that he instructed Pope Francis about the sanctions and allegations in 2013, Pope Francis turned a blind eye and repealed the sanctions.  Why?  If Pope Francis really wanted ‘justice for the children’ as he commanded the Bishops at the conference in Rome, why then did he repeal the sanctions of abuse on his own Archbishop?

But it is worse.  The Vatican and multiple Bishops received reports of McCarricks ‘transgressions’ for decades before anything was done at all.

The history of the abuse within the church was not even addressed by the media until the 1980’s, within the auspices of the Franklin Scandal, and the UK Jimmy Savile sensational story.  In both instances, pedophilia, abuse, was asserted against numerous high profile persons in the US and UK, including entertainment and sports figures, politicians, doctors, lawyers, and anyone with a lot of money to spend.

Like the Catholic Church pedophilia scandals, neither of these two scandals provided justice in any form whatsoever to the victims.  And in most instances, the victims were actually further victimized.  No one went to jail.  No one was sanctioned.   The stories were so high profile, so backed with $$$$ that to this day, one person was charged, Jimmy Savile.

To think that a conference of a handful of corrupt Bishops presided by a corrupt Pope would yield anything different, is like slapping Weinstein on the wrist and demanding that he write 500 times, “I will not ever do that again…”  With his fingers crossed behind his back.   “Pinky swear.”

Some media outlets tend to blame the Priesthood’s rule of chastity as their defense and justification.  And while their manhood might be difficult to subjugate, child abuse is not a normal evolution.   Pedophilia, is not a normal evolution.   A Priest, a Bishop enter the Church promising to uphold chastity as a part of their dedication.   If they don’t believe this is acceptable, there are numerous alternate religions that espouse Christianity that do not adhere to this particular conviction.  They have – a Choice.

One of Pope Francis most revered authoritarians was Romano Guardini, who wrote extensively of Christian Socialism.   Guardini embraced such philosopher’s as Nietzsche, Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle, who advocated Atheism.  Under his pre-Pope name, Jorge Maria Bergoglio, Pope Francis was not bereft of drudge and accusations, including his purported facilitation of the kidnapping of two Jesuit Priests during Argentina’s Dirty War.  These Priests were then subjected to horrific torture. Complaints were filed.  And despite one of the Priests coming forward and claiming the Bergoglio was indeed complicit, and not only reluctant to help, but allegedly involved, the case was – dismissed.

Why?

Money talks.

And so, this is the Pope. This is the Francis who claims that – now – suddenly – the children deserve justice.   This is the person, the man, the power vacuum that wields the whip of Catholic Doctrine and by default, core religiosity.  He sits behind the gated, walled, city of the Vatican that is guarded by the most elite soldiers in the world, equipped with infinite guns and ammo, to protect the men and their wealth who have confiscated their bounty over centuries in the form of art, real estate, stocks, and gold.  All the while telling the sheep what is real, what is truth, what is history, and what is – sin.

While living – the Dream.

Sexual abuse of children is a part of that dream.   It is a part of the history of valuing self above the law – even, the law of God.

World Leaders: Pussies Without A Clue

Ronald Reagan was the last lion.

He radically changed the tax system, defeated communism, cut the price of oil by 60% and made the US the most powerful country the world has ever known.

As much I loathe Winston Churchill, at least he wasn’t a pussy without a clue. The guy at one point carried a rifle. He may have been a racist but at least he wasn’t a fucking baby. He smoked incessantly, drank scotch all day long and reviled in insulting his political enemies. God do we miss the guy.

Now, a US senator resigns because he put his hands over a woman’s breasts on a flack jacket.

Another is told to resign over a high school Halloween costume.

A German Chancellor can’t figure out why admitting a million male Syrian Muslims that can’t speak German might be bad for Germany.

A French PM can’t stop Moroccan hordes from destroying southern France. His own citizens tear Paris to pieces, Jews are run out of a country they’ve lived in for 10 generations and he hides.

In the US, politicians hide while high school kids are assaulted…

their school’s targeted and their lives endangered. Meanwhile, around the world, these same leaders cower from even the smallest problem.

The number of countries that balance their federal budgets can be counted on your left foot.

Even with a literal flood of money, these same governments can barely function. Welfare is handed out by the boatload, the people suffer from obesity, uselessness and diabetes and nobody can figure out why this is a bad thing.

And as people get fatter, lazier and more useless, the worldwide whining hits a fever pitch in a chorus of WHAT ABOUT ME!

The simple fact is,

If Vladimir Putin ran in any western country, he’d win.

The last President of the US went on television to announce his March Madness basketball picks while we were at war in five countries. He did an interview about politics on Comedy Central. And while the Navy Seals were killing Osama bin Ladin, he was in the White House kitchen playing hearts with “the body,” a man the White hired “to keep the President company.”

The President before him was so stupid he couldn’t pronounce the word nuclear.

On 911 he was reading children’s books to a grammar school class. During the Vietnam war, he joined the “Champaign unit” of the Texas national guard and learned to fly a decommissioned plane while there was a pilot shortage. Then he went AWOL and had it covered up by his daddy. His first major campaign stop was the Little League World’s series. He was given a baseball team and a massive middle eastern oil concession and couldn’t make money on either one.

America’s current crew of candidates…

include a slut, a communist, a spoiled, suburban socialist, a man who drew a grand total of 65 supporters at a border wall protest whose previous occupation was nanny. Then there’s a 76-year-old groper and another 76-year-old media “icon” who 95% of the population wouldn’t recognize in a police lineup. And to make matters worse, no one seems to know why a secretary of state who shared confidential information with people with no security clearances and took in $230 million in “speaking fees” might be doing something wrong.

Most of Europe is run by hedge fund managers for the benefit of banks.

They’re so inept they can’t even agree on what language should be used on bathroom doors. The only leader in all of Europe with any cojones’ is the 92-year-old Queen Elizabeth.

As I said, if Vladimir Putin ran for office in any western country, he’d not only win, he’d win in a huge landslide.

Thomas Jefferson once said that the people will end up with leaders they deserve. Let’s hope to God he’s wrong.

 

UN: Climate Change…

The UN has a headlined article referencing climate change and the devastating effects sit has had on Africa.  Specifically, they cite Lake Chad which covered approximately 10,000 to 25,000 square km in 1983 and today fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 km.  The problem with the UN statement?  Lake Chad has been eroding since 5000 BC when it is estimated to have covered roughly 1 million km.

But the UN is still demanding that the member countries fork over $100 billion per year to defend against the travesties of climate change that is causing;  droughts, floods, conflict, hunger, famine, poverty, greater migration, political instability, Ebola, stress and lack of resilience.  They feel that the African governments are forced to syphon off money to combat these disasters when the money could be used for education, social programs, healthcare, and business development. Citing the cause of the current droughts to be the abnormally strong El Nino cycle, El Nino representing the warm cycle and La Nino the cool.  Of course, as with any graph, your starting point can significantly alter ones perception.

1980 seems to have been a particularly peak year according to the various methodology graphs which show a decidedly less El Nino impact since.   The previous comparable to the 1980 impact was in 1895 and again in 1910.  Not a lot of CO2 emissions then.  And hence the debate, at least as promulgated by the UN.

Most, if not all, scientific journals describe El Nino as a ‘natural phenomenon’.  In a nutshell, El Nino is caused by weakening trade winds. The trade winds are caused by a combination of convection air currents and the Earth’s rotation.  What would cause them to weaken?

The scenario becomes an argument of the chicken and the egg, which comes first?   Globalists argue that global warming causes weakened trade winds.  But if that were true, prior to industrialization the Oscillation Index would never oscillate – it would be static showing a beginning causal human effect. But it doesn’t.  Which leads to the alternate argument, weakened trade winds effectuate warming conditions.

Trade winds are a function of the pressure gradient of the atmosphere over the ocean.  And science has yet to determine what causes that pressure gradient change.   They can tell you what happens – but not why.

“Atmospheric pressure is caused by the gravitational attraction of the planet on the atmospheric gases above the surface, and is a function of the mass of the planet, the radius of the surface, and the amount and composition of the gases and their vertical distribution in the atmosphere.”

Atmospheric Pressure is governed by Atmospheric Tides. The Tides can be affected by:

 

“The reason for this dramatic growth in amplitude from tiny fluctuations near the ground to oscillations that dominate the motion of the mesosphere lies in the fact that the density of the atmosphere decreases with increasing height. As tides or waves propagate upwards, they move into regions of lower and lower density. If the tide or wave is not dissipating, then its kinetic energy density must be conserved. Since the density is decreasing, the amplitude of the tide or wave increases correspondingly so that energy is conserved.”

So we are back to defining The Chicken And The Egg:

Some of the classic causes of these changes include; a change in the Earth’s tilt, alteration in the Moon’s density and/or configuration, changes in the ‘tropics’ deforestation, etc… , and possibly weather manipulation – when nations try to alter El Nino and Al Nino to effect war, rain, snow, optimal weather for special events – The Olympics, etc… they alter the natural phenomenon.   And don’t know how to reinstate it.   So instead, they blame the causal factor elsewhere – a Distraction.

So, in other words, while Scientists are still fighting over the conundrum of The Chicken And The Egg, they are certain that when it comes to Climate Change it is….   They don’t know.

What exactly does the UN propose to do with $100 billion per year?

Spend it on Africa of course.  How?  By “empowering women to be effective climate action champions”, “supporting governments with improved information climate warning systems”, and “improving food security”.   Straight off the UN website.

Why Africa?

To understand the motives, one needs to understand who supports the UN.   It is increasingly clear that The People, do not.  That would leave ‘governments’.   Governments who have abdicated the power of The People, and chosen to bear Law, make decisions, pass legislation, and act quite like a Monarchial system.   It is our history.

Subordination.

Lately, we have all tossed about the terms Socialism and Communism, and yet, we have alluded to the ‘reign’ of Obama, and Queen Hillary, and perhaps not given those labels their fair due.   Because, in essence, in order to own the globe, one needs a “Supreme Leader”, a King/Queen, to dominate and officiate, and enslave.  As this earth has done for thousands of years – until now.

Today, that effect is more complicated.   People are more educated.   Wealth has been spread more liberally.   And everyone in Hollywood, the low lifes of the Monarchial times, today think they are ‘the monarchy’.   The Rulers.

In the end, you have to try and conceptualize the amount of money the UN is asking – $100 billion per year.   In addition, to their budget.  In addition to all the subsidiary budgets.  USAID. UNICEF.   Etc…

In conclusion, the UN’s worthiness and purpose have significantly deteriorated in the last decade or so, since Obama came to ‘reign’.  And perhaps it was really decades earlier, but Obama brought it to the surface, brought light to the corruption that he embraced and lived.

Not to say Obama was not simply a cog in the skew or puppetry would be short-sighted. Although egos would seem to dictate that most everyone we think are aligned, also think they are ‘worthy’ and elite.   And therefore believe they will be the few – saved.

Only to learn they are – the least.  It is ultimately – in your heart.

Trying to unravel the entire scheme of the Cabal is like trying to define the universe!  Not even Hawking could do that!   And yet, we are stubborn, and try.   The Cabal is an interesting lineage that dates thousands of years into our history which apparently we can only retain for 100 days.???   

UN Migration Pact: Global Order By UN

On December 10 and 11 the world governments will come together to sign the UN Migration Pact. So far the US, Hungary, Poland, Austria, Czech Republic, Israel, Australia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Switzerland and Italy have withdrawn approval.  Why?

The Pact is an ongoing attempt to globalize governments into the rule of International Law whereby decisions are arbitrated on behalf of a country given “no state can address migration alone”.   Further, the Pact states that data collection will become a strategized goal whereby a global programme will determine a countries national capacity. This data will be reviewed by the UN Statistical Commission annually in cooperation with the World Bank Global Knowledge Partnership on Migration and Development.  Migration will no longer be classified as having a refugee status, all migrants will be created equal.  And all arms will point back to the global powerhead – the UN!

Within this Migration Pact, the 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development will be forefront.  Migration as a result of Climate Change will ensure the human rights of those affected taking in recommendations from ‘state-led’ consultants.  In so doing all immigrants will receive a work permit, a certificate of nationality, counseling, legal guidance on their rights according to International Law, gender responsive support, training, and a job.  As their Human Right.

As Africa sees mass exodus as a direct result of these freebies, African states will likely be more vulnerable and subject to takeover.  Land grabs will be more prolific and Green Climate Funds derived from the Paris Accord will suddenly make sense in their diversion.  Full circle to a Continent untapped and in need of vast infrastructure improvement in order to adequately cultivate those resources.  Ta-Da – Africa Couped!

In the meantime, the UN will extend their arm of Global Leader.  The division of Africa will come under the control and mandate of the UN, and those with insider rule will WIN.

As of 2015, the countries whose ODA (Official Development Assistance) was concentrated in Africa include: Portugal, Ireland, Belgium, and Iceland. The US contributed the greatest dollar amount covering 30% of all contributions to Africa.

The 2030 Agenda, which is lovingly referred to as the New Agenda, states that the means of implementation of a Utopian world will only be able to be accomplished via a ‘Global Partnership’ whereby global solidarity is paramount.  The New Agenda lays out The Addis Ababa Action Agenda as the means to finance the litany of Agendas:    “…a commitment to a new ‘social compact’ in which countries commit to set up social protection systems, with national spending targets for essential services like health and education. If countries cannot funds these through domestic resources, the international community pledges to provide international assistance.

Countries also agreed to work together to fund infrastructure for energy, transport, and water and sanitation, as well as step-up investments in agriculture and nutrition. There was also a commitment to establish a ‘facilitation mechanism’ to promote innovation and scientific cooperation, identify technology needs and gaps, and support capacity building on technology.” 

Countries will fund these Agendas by committing a percentage of Gross National Income.

Of course, the biggest issue in implementing Addis Ababa was Tax.  Therefore, the UN created a new programme entitled, Tax Inspectors Without Borders.   They will help countries to collect and audit the implemented tax that will fund the fund that funds that funds the fund within the ODA fund that gives the money to recreate Africa after all the mass exodus of natives and their relocation with freebies across the EU, North and South America.

As of 2018, these Tax Inspectors managed to raise $414 million.

Given that by simple Geographics the EU is the closest land mass for the African exodus, a quota that includes all countries across the globe is necessary in order to disperse according to the UN’s determination of  ‘capacity’.   Guidelines will map global sites of entry and the UN will determine the welfare administration of these displaced migrants.

Currently, war and conflicts have been the primary means of achieving exodus.  But this was based on refugee status and excluded simple immigrants. These UN provisions would alter that censorship of migration and Open Borders to all.   It extends the global power hold that the UN has been ramping up for decades within a body that grossly mismanages its own funds according to their latest audit, is mired in sex trafficking, rape and sexual assaults in Africa, and seems to in reality have ‘accomplished’ nothing other than to hold countless discussions and make empty meaningless promises.

The New World Order is under the gun and fighting a ravage brawl in its home base of Germany.   You just can’t make this stuff up!

All of this is being done in the name of “Mother Earth”, according to the UN.  Scottie beam me aboard the Mother Ship – NOW!

Elections: Toxic Masculinity or Liberal Fear

Phraseology flying, the slogan, ‘Toxic Masculinity’ has been thrown around like a sucker punch used to berate and escalate – well toxic attitudes.  Because that’s exactly what it does – it creates another division, another form of hypocritical hate speech, driven predominantly by left leaning women and – sigh, men.  Of course men say it as though they are mind deployed aliens whose brains have been harvested, much like the radical ‘White Men’ slander punches.

While the word was first used in 2004 in a book discussing different types of men and their masculine tendencies, also called hegemonic masculinity, it didn’t become a  popular demonizing phrase until 2013 when it was defined in Geek Feminism Wiki as ‘one of the ways in which Patriarchy is harmful to men’.

Since then it has been liberally dribbled about by Hollywood and the MSM to socially demean certain men, and sometimes men in general, much like the ‘white men’ phenomena.  We hear Robert DeNiro spew spittle and profanity about our President, calling on people to harm him and anyone associated with him because of Trump’s ‘toxic masculinity’.  Of course DeNIro completely misses the carnival mirror depicting himself that makes most of us nonHollywooders cringe with creepiness as he is most obviously ‘toxic masculinity’ in it’s full frontal explosion.

I read it in obscure places like Mike Frost’s blog, a Reverend and academic at a school in Australia. Of course, in his small opinion, it would seem fodder to make commentary about – Trump.  I commented on one of Mr. Frost’s blog posts – once – only for him to grandiosely attempt to ridicule me and denounce me personally.  Why?  Because I offered a ‘different opinion’ regarding his claims.  In other words, Mr. Frost was exhibiting ‘toxic masculinity’.

I have been the victim of it on even the most bizarre of platforms – dating sites.  Where instead of acceptance and conversation, I became the brunt of attack and hatred.  Toxic masculinity.  But not from Trump, not from conservatives, in fact it seems to be most oppressively used by Liberal minded men and women in a clearly hypocritical, log in the eye fashion.

It comes on the flames of liberals claiming they are about peace, love and inclusion while finding all kinds of people they feel shouldn’t be included in the inclusion:  white men, conservative women, conservative men, conservative black men, masculine men, feminine women, stay at home moms, anyone wearing a hat that states Make America Great, any animal owned by anyone conservative… because we are the hate mongers.

Since 2015, there have been well over 170 protests (based on days not cities) against Donald Trump. Most of them are not about anything except – we don’t like you.  That would be over a period of roughly 3 years, or roughly five each month.

During Obama’s entire two term administration there were… 8.  We didn’t much care for him.  We didn’t like his policies.  We didn’t like his agenda.  We simply turned him – off.

The peaceful vs the peaceful…

Conservatives don’t attend protests often.   Rallies? Yes, they are positive events, they signal support and victory and hurrah.  But Protests and riots are about demonizing, threatening, violence and destruction.  If we have an issue, it is best served in a written content.

These are both men who were elected by The People.

Hitler advocated for violence.  Soros advocates for violence.  Eric Holder, Maxine, Cher, Handler, Kathy  whatshername, Behar, Robert deNiro, and a multitude of Hollywood Liberals advocate for assault and violence.  It is an obvious linkage.  And yet, still, conservatives do not protest.  We attend rallies to support someone, but most often the masks, the violence, is perpetrated in the name of – peaceful Democrat/Socialists.

The left is advocating Revolution.  Why?  Because they didn’t get their way…  They are superior, and thus feel that they should have their way.   It is an infantile behavior.  In the name – of peace, tolerance and hugs for all.

In essence it is born of fear.  A fear of losing their ‘toxic Hollywoodism’.  Their feelings of superiority and fear of the truth that will ultimately be revealed that is far more devastating than just the couch fame protocol which we have all been guilty of accepting, breeds – fear.

I imagine the Hollywood Executives, the one’s whose hands are bloodied in money, are going nuts as their profits plummet amid the childish antics of their $$$$ pool of actors as they make public fools of themselves and derail 50% of the viewer base.  Not exactly a ‘business’ move, but then they are after all – ‘entertainers’.  Nothing more.    And in that – protests are simply another means of entertaining – themselves.

The Kinks coined it quite well in a phrase in which they depicted Hollywood as ‘celluloid heroes’, in other words, fake, transparent, not real.

It is the conservatives in Hollywood who hide.  They are the ones who fear blacklisting, rapprochement, and hate from the ‘pacifist liberals’.

Oddly, all of this multiple decades long globalism, fascism and toxicity, is blamed on Trump.  Find a person to horde all the blame for every wrong doing during the history of mankind, is the mantra.  I doubt there is any person, any couple, in the history of mankind who has been tasked with rising above the acrimonial amount of blame and hysteria and rancid comments as Donald and Melania Trump.

Q?  A radical supporter of Truth.

Conservatives.  A hodge podge of Americans wanting to know the Truth.   Feeling energized.  Feeling confident.  And weary of decades of subservience.

This is the moment of Truth.  Do you stand for your self?  Or do you stand with dignity, honor and God?   This is NOT toxic masculinity – it is Toxic Hollywoodarity, and they are masks, fake faces, celluloid, speaking scripts, and wishing they were something more than a lowly actor.

Because, in the end, they will be – left behind.

MEDIA SPIES: Murder By Suicide

Remember the Sergei Skripal poisoning in the UK that was determined to be a Russian plot without evidence?

A few interesting timeline statistics have surfaced rather quietly, the most interesting being that it took one hourbetween the time the Skripals were found slumped on the bench and the police to call for airlifts.   Why?

When the scientist who created Novichok inadvertently poisoned himself, he was given food which he immediately threw up.  When inhaled, the effects of Novichok poison are said to take 30 seconds.   If, as the latest MI6 press release claims, they were poisoned via the house doorknob, they would have become infected within minutes –

After an incredibly thorough investigation that involved over 300 British police and intelligence agents, three months later Matthew Rowley and his ‘partner’, Dawn Sturgess were apparently on a lark in the same park whereby they found a bottle of perfume lying on the ground.  According to Rowley, he decided to pick it up, take it home to his girlfriend/partner and tell her it was a gift.  Although he also accounts that they both found it.  His stories change intermittently.   At some point, she sprayed the contents on ‘her wrists’.  Rowley claims he got some on his hands but immediately washed it off.  Why?  The contents included – Novichok.  She died eight days later!  Rowley spent 10 days in the hospital and was released and ‘cured’.

 

  1. How is it that a random bottle of perfume is riddled with the poison Novichok?
  2. How is it that said random bottle turns up 3 months later discarded on the ground of a park near where the Skripal poisoning occurred?
  3. Who would ever pick up a discarded bottle of perfume – take it home – and spray oneself?
  4. How is it that Dawn died in 8 days and yet the Skripals both survived?
  5. Rowley claims that he found the bottle in a park near where the Skripal’s were poisoned.So how come the 300+ UK intelligence and police agents managed to never find this – clue?

 

If it looks funky – it is because it is!

The “Russian Nerve Agent”, as it is affectionately now called, is actually Russian in its origin dating to the 1990’s but has since expanded its diplomaticties to the UK, US, Czech Republic, Romania, Canada, Iran, and just about any nation in the world – take your pick.

While the media claimed that upwards of 38-48 people were exposed to the Skripal nerve agent, oddly, despite all of them being tested, none showed any signs of the agent in their system.  And they were all sent home.  That would indicate their particular poisoning was not air-born, but ingested – after their meal.  If in fact it was Novichok…

Of course, this isn’t the first time an odd coincidence occurred in the UK involving MI6 and their agents.

In 2010, Garrett Williams, an MI6 code intelligence breaker hacked into the Clinton account.  Two days later he was zipped into a duffle bag, the bag was padlocked from the outside, and placed in a bath-tub in his apartment.   Despite the fact that he was an MI6 agent, they apparently made no investigation into his disappearance,and ultimately found him much later – decomposing.   The cause of death was ruled – Suicide, according to MI6.  Initially, it was ruled a Russian hit because, one of the many issues he was ‘working on’ involved Russia…and the Clinton hack was certainly not politicized although it was later revealed that his superiors were livid over this apparent infraction.

In 1994 an ex-MI6 man, James Rusbridger, was found hanged at his house in Cornwall.
Rusbridger had discovered that a group within MI6 appeared to have helped Hitler both before and during the war.   He was found wearing a green chemical protection suit, rubber gloves, gas mask, and black plastic mackintosh.  His death was ruled – Suicide.

Most often, MI6 claims that the suicide is the result of a sexual theme gone afoul.   The media is told what to print and the investigation is closed and sealed.

Why is this so relevant?

As we observe the Swamp, the corruption, the fraud employed within the US CIA, NSA, and FBI, it would surely be quite short-sighted to believe it ends here.   And while the US and UK are given special attention, Germany, France, Canada, and Australia would seem to fly under the radar…

Why?

The German Intelligence equivalent of NSA is the BND.

While the BND Gesetz Act regulates the authority of Germany intelligence and protects citizens of Germany, any communication that crosses borders is fair game and is no longer subject to any law or regulation.  However, assuming that NSA works in conjunction with MI6, BND,the French, Canadian, etc…  in order to maintain the law within the regulations an agency simply needs to pass the buck to a colluded intelligence agency.   Have MI6 do the dirty work inside Germany, and the BND inside the UK.

So while the CIA, NSA and FBI are all undergoing massive swamp cooling effects, the BND, MI6, and others worldwide are picking up the slack without any deterrence…

According to Ben Scott who was a former advisor to Hillary while she was Secretary of State, and is currently an advisor at the Open Technology Institute, the BND power is on par with MI6 and NSA.

It is interesting to note that the Open Technology Institute is a program of the New America Foundation – which is funded by Google, Facebook, and other media conglomerates all focusing on censorship!  In fact, in 2013 during Hillary’s tenure, one of New America’s top funders was – The Department Of State.

Google’s Eric Schmidt is the Executive Chairman at New America (an odd source of media freedom and a censor of media freedom in favor of Hillary’s lost campaign).  New America was founded by the liberal global climate change advocate, Ted Halstead.

Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Snapchat, and other liberal social media institutions collaborate with New America in their censorship of ‘fake news’.   They all promote the Russia responsibility for all demonizing.  And they are ALL scheduled for a ‘secret meeting’ today in San Francisco to discuss “election protection challenges”!!

Their defined tag line is: committed to renewing American politics, prosperity, and purpose in the Digital Age. Well sourced information with minimal bias.

Were the Skripal’s poisoned by Russia or MI6?  Were they poisoned at all?   How did a perfume bottle go undetected by 300+ special intelligence forces for three months in the same park?  

Washington Post Gives Blueprint For Fake News

An Opinion Writer for the Washington Post who bills himself as having a ‘Liberal Slant’, is offering his strategy for how to squelch the good news about the Trump Economy, and instead focus on negatives in the media so as to target the ‘non-college educated whites’ and serve them a hefty portion of fake news.   This writer advocates for the media to propagandize further by inundating these ‘weak willed po’r whites’ with alternative news that demonizes Trump policies and even blames him for the failed Obamacare! 

According to this man, the media will instead focus their attention on drilling forward with the Russia plot and the immigration skew, which was actually instituted in 2003 and escalated dramatically in 2014 under Obama…  But the MSM will somehow fail to remember those ‘facts’ and fly off with Trump attacks – while whining about retribution and deny any wrong doing – while claiming that ‘people will get hurt’ because of Trump, while sadly shaking their heads at all the dumb idiots that support Trump…

It would be interesting should all the ‘weak, dumb, non-educated whites’ read this Liberal perception of who they are and how the Democrats anticipate swaying their votes…I wonder if they would feel respected?  Represented? Honored?

I imagine, quite the contrary, they would feel conned.

Because unfortunately, that is the Media that righteously defends itself, fact checks itself, and polls itself.  And ultimately reports – on itself.

All within the screams of UN-BIASED.

Another point of contention that these readers want to propagandize is that under Trump, real wages declined .02%…   In fact, between 2015 and 2017, real wages tanked, monthly real median household income – tanked, and health insurance premiums will have doubled during Obama’s Legacy with some states having seen annual rate increases over 100% and a choice of ‘one insurer’.

So now our esteemed Liberalcrats have revealed their strategy which is akin to giving ISIS your military blueprint…  Not too savvy.   And therein lies the fallacy in their entire agenda which is to create false reports, denigrate the people you want to vote for you, and threaten to kill them if they don’t.

This is why they lost. 

Obamacare Healthcare: Breakeven for Insurers!

The Federalist has released a statement that Obamacare insurers are ‘finally’ going to make a profit… because they can ‘finally’ charge premiums that sustain their expenditures. WOW!   Poor babies…

So who are these ‘poor babies’?

Anthem President Gail Boudreaux made $2.2 million, including stock awards, after working 2 months in 2017 (November and December).   The previous CEO stayed on through May and only made $26.4 million in ‘realized pay’.

Molina Healthcare’s new CEO, Zubretsky, who also started in November faired quite a bit better making $19.7 million which included a ‘sign-on bonus’.

Cigna CEO took home $43.9 million including stock gains. Humana CEO had realized pay of $34.2 million.   United has yet to release the data, but figures have fluctuated to as high as $124.8 million.   Kaiser and Blue cross are up for grabs…

As a nonprofit, Kaiser reported Net Income of $3.1 billion in 2016.   United Healthcare reported Net Income $10.82 billion in 2017. And Anthem Blue Cross came in at $2.47 billion Net Income for 2016.

So what the hey?   How is it that these companies are supposedly ‘just now’ making a profit, because that’s a lot of non-profit profit and compensation flying around!

In a world where all healthcare premiums are equal, these CEO’s should be paying monthly premiums of roughly $212,500 to $1,768,000 – conservatively.   Maybe then, they would feel the ‘Burn’…   Because, I don’t think they have a freakin’ clue.

Apparently, this Federalist author didn’t do the math because when I research the Net Income of United Healthcare, it has increased 137% since 2008.   And the CEO’s are living large on 25% increases, 46% increases, and 60% increases in total payout.   So tell me again how the ‘insurers’ are just now breaking even under Obamacare?

Poor babies.

As a comparison, physician salaries and compensation ranges between about $200,000 and $500,000 depending on the specialty – and can obviously be far greater if the physician has spiffs, patents, etc…   But it is still a very far cry from the CEO compensation of ‘Health Insurers’.   Poor babies.

In fact, the equalized monthly healthcare premiums of the CEO’s outstrips the total wage base of physicians! So how is it that these corporations are just now making a profit when in fact they have always made exceptional profits while boasting exceptional wages for the CEO’s and Executives?

It’s a magic act, something like the Wizard of Oz wherein the smoke and blubbering of the media exalts a story that has absolutely no basis in fact.   Unless, we are exalting the “New Math” wherein 2+2 = 1… or 6… or 3, because there is no ‘correct’ answer, because then someone might cry because they were wrong – and opinion over-rules fact, and…

So if Warren Buffet has reported adjusted gross income of $63 million, and we adjust for his offshore accounts let’s bump that to $200 million, then his health insurance liability should be $2,833,333 per Month!   His Income Tax liability should then be 37% or $6,166,666 – per month!   Sounds fair – right? 

Do you think the ‘health insurer’ would lower its monthly premium if it was income based?   I think there would be a LOT of pressure, and a massive change.   Imagine!