Germany: FREE Child Care Will Cost 3 Billion Euro

Germany has a daycare problem, it has been made hugely worse by the importation of millions of immigrants who by law may use the municipal daycare facilities, for free given they have no income.   However, there are simply nowhere near enough facilities to accommodate the German children, much less the multitudes of added immigrants.   Merkel’s solution?  Make it all free, then everyone will be guaranteed a spot! Yeah!  Sounds good for the media!   So what’s the problem?  There are NO SPOTS!   Stories abound of German workers who take advantage of the extended leave made available by law, put their children on a waiting list, only to find there still is no available slot after their 14 months leave has run out.

Making daycare free will only exasperate the problem!   Subsidies already cover a hefty percentage of the costs at roughly 225 euros per month. Until recently, this subsidy was provided to parents that chose to keep their children home, out of daycare, but this law was over-turned when a group of activists protested that it encouraged moms to stay at home – a taboo in Germany.

Because in Germany, it is much more preferable to have the state bring up your children for you… And they can’t understand why their birth rate is the lowest in all of Europe.  Odd.

Refugees and immigrants are given priority for daycare slots because the government feels this is the only way to assure the children will learn German…   Thus, Germans are relegated to hiring nannies and au-pairs at a significantly higher cost.

Essentially, when Merkel announced free daycare for everyone, she was really addressing all the immigrants who have yet to take advantage of the welfare benefit.   The potential domino effect of these policies is Germans will lose their employment because they can’t find daycare, can’t find an au pair or nanny, or can’t afford the private costs.

In 2011, Merkel announced that all children over three have the ‘legal right’ to daycare.   In 2013, all children over the age of 12 months were granted this ‘legal right’.  But the terminology is useless if there isn’t an available facility.   In fact, it was estimated that in order to accommodate this right by 2013, Germany would have needed to ADD 140,000 new facilities!  Never made it even close, the infrastructure was not available and the cost topped well over $3 billion.

The solution?

In 2017, a judge determined that parents who are unable to find a government sponsored facility may sue the government for lost wages!   Merkel?

While state sponsored German media outlets applaud the low cost grand scheme of daycare in Germany, the reality is starkly different:

  1. shortage of workers, in Germany they are called ‘childminders’ for family care, means importing them from other countries…
  2. shortage of facilities meant that many communities simply used PODS, or warehouses without any play areas, small spaces, crowded spaces, and inadequate supplies.
  3. parents have taken to bribing managers given the wait list can be exorbitantly long, 5 or more years in more urban areas like Munich and Heidelberg.
  4. a study commissioned by the Federal Families Ministry of Germany, found that only 3% of the facilities were considered of ‘good’ quality.  None apparently made it higher.
  5. there is no standard curriculum and politicians don’t want to require one given this could increase already burgeoning costs.

The cost to the government in providing subsidies and promoting families has been running  $270 billion per year.   Part of the reasoning for the initiative was a result of the ever declining birth rate – which was the major reasoning behind bringing in the immigrants.  Germany needs children and immigrants to fill the cost of supporting an ever aging population, because the German birth rate continues to decline.  So the government decided that the reason adults in Germany were not procreating was because they wanted more state sponsored welfare programs to raise their children for them.

What will Merkel’s new freebie contribute?

Higher taxes given Germany is already grappling with the requirement that it boost it’s military spending to be in compliance with EU regulations, nothing is “Free”.  Higher childcare costs as demand can not match availability, and expatriation as couples search to fill their needs.

Cost of Child Care in Germany:

State run facility – $400 Euro per month average

Private facility – $500 to $900 per month average

Au Pair – 4 weeks paid vacation, 30 hour work week, sick days, public holidays, paid travel, secure room, board and a monthly stipend starting at roughly 450 euros.

Nanny – typically charge 2,000 to 2,500 Euro a month

EU Commission: Gluttonous Spending

The EU Commission is embarking on a massive mission of garnering sought after revenue by suing major US companies including; Google, Amazon, Starbucks, Qualcomm and Apple. The woman behind the coup is Denmark’s, Margreth Vestager, a Socialist Liberal.   Vestager was the primary instigator in leveling a fine on Cyprus Airlines that ultimately resulted in their going bankrupt and the loss of 550 jobs.  By all accounts, she is – brutal.

The Google fine is heavy, weighing in at an astounding $5.1 billion as well as a demand that they change their business model to allow greater competition in the European market.  Whether this affects the share price is debatable, but the fact that the EU is specifically targeting US firms is of more interest as the Commission revenues have floundered and an appeal for funds is most likely the driving force, especially when BREXIT is finalized and 14 billion euro’s result in a significant shortfall.

The Trade War Behind The Trade War

This is not the first time the EU Commission has made headlines and enemies in trade disputes. IN 2004 Microsoft was ordered to pay $497 million which was the largest fine to date.  In 2006, they again attacked Microsoft and imposed an additional $448 million for competition violations.   And again in 2009 imposed $1.44 billion in fines.  And again in 2013, 561 million Euros.  In 2009, the EU Commission fined Intel $1.45 billion.

It would seem that the EU Commission is pocketing quite a bit of revenue from fines which, according to Article 83 of the EU Commission Protocol, are not reported as revenue but instead are held in a ‘special fund’ portfolio of high quality sovereign bonds with no designated purpose. 

In 2014, the Commission reported that of 70 separate fines imposed on various businesses, they collected $2.2 billion in ‘funds’.   In 2016, the EU Commission expenditures topped 136.4 billion Euros with roughly 8 billion going toward ‘Administration’.  Of course, it is important to note that administration is not an all inclusive of salaries and wages given that each sub-section absorbs costs that are ‘allocated’ to the specific project.   The two largest projects are;  Sustainable Growth Natural Resources, and Smart and Inclusive Growth which combined absorb over 90% of expenditures.

What the heck?

Smart and Inclusive Growth is supposedly targeting infrastructure and jobs in the least developed EU countries.   Sustainable Growth targets increased agriculture productivity.

In 2013, an external audit revealed that £109 billion out of a total of £117 billion spent by the EU in 2013 was “affected by material error”.  In fact, the audits for the previous 19 years all revealed similar deficits.  At the same time, the Commission was demanding additional sums from the UK in the amount of 1.7 billion creating  a havoc of hypocrisy and distrust.

The newly released budget for the Commission is slated at 1.14 trillion Euro.  The largest expenditure is applied to ‘foreign aid’ for countries wishing to become EU members – 123 billion Euros.

Given such an astronomical budget, what exactly has the EU Commission accomplished over it’s lifetime?

1)  It ratified the Paris Climate Accord

2)  It initiated the phasing out of export subsidies to allow poorer countries the opportunity to compete in agriculture

3)  It banished the death penalty

4)  It created a single market

5)  It ‘theoretically created open borders that meant passports were not necessary – although in reality due to the EU’s refuge and immigrant abject failures this open border policy is no longer being followed.

But most of the funding supports Research and studies that tackle various concerns including a project that determined cargo ships use less fuel than lorries, a mobile app to monitor weight loss, a publication of our galaxy, the design of an electric car for aging people, continuing research to expand renewable energy supply which now accounts for 5% of all energy output, and a project in which busses were subjected to a three year trial to determine if hydrogen fuel is a viable alternative…

While these projects all have relevance, it would seem the cost of funding the commission is rather extraordinary in comparison to the actual economic benefits achieved.

BY contrast, it would appear the US does not reciprocate in embarking in lawsuits against EU businesses that violate trade competition.

Child Detention Centers Generated $5.2 Billion Annually?

October 2012, a scathing article was written exposing the Obama Practice of putting illegal alien children crossing the border alone in prison like detention centers, and given the lack of space, sometimes they had to be housed at military facilities.   Between October 2011 and June 2012, border agents apprehended 15590 children and put them in detention centers.   There were no parents in these shelters. 

In 2014, a USA Today article again unleashed a scathing report as it exposed 90,000 unaccompanied children were now living in US detention centers, while 1100 of them were being housed at a Texas Air Force base due to lacking space.

It was revealed that according to Homeland Security:

“Several temporary and permanent resettlement centers on the border have opened just to house unaccompanied migrant children. But the HHS’ Administration for Children & Families, which has responsibility for the children, won’t say where the centers are or how much is being spent for the kids’ care.”

Federal law states that the unaccompanied children are supposed to be turned over to HHS within 72 hours and then reunited with parents or other relatives already living in the United States.

But they weren’t – otherwise there would be no need for so many Detention Facilities.  Follow The Money.   The Walmart in Brownsville Texas that garnered all kinds of conspiracy theories that it was going to be a prison for US citizens when Obama declared Marshall Law – was actually transformed into a ‘children’s detention facility’ and shuttered from the press or public – by Obama.

The conditions of some facilities were so awful a complaint was filed by the American Civil Liberties Organization citing children not even given water, molestation, and beatings.   At the time federal funding cuts were being made against organizations that were tasked with addressing this problem. Appropriations were scarce, and according to the article:  “The problem with the administration is they don’t want to give information,” he said. “In fact, there’s times when they don’t want to give information to members of Congress. It’s almost like they don’t want the American public to know about the situation.”

The issue was obviously quite alive and thriving throughout the entire tenure of the Obama Administration who wanted to cover it up, and pretend it didn’t exist.

In fact, the exact same photos were being splashed across the media exposing ‘cages’ and over-crowded facilities – in 2014.

But it even gets better for those with short term memory loss.  In 2016, Obama was attempting to force the state of Texas to grant the largest child detention facility a new classification “Child Care Facility”, despite the fact that it was originally built as a prison for men.   It boasts a gym, Zumba classes, a beauty salon, playgrounds and a school, not exactly short-term – as in 72 hour holding.   While opponents wanted the facilities shut down and the children released, Obama argued that it would not be in their best interest and granting child care status would open the facilities up to receiving considerably more government funding.

A former employee at one of the Texas centers stated that, “security locked up migrant mothers who spoke out about the conditions. She said a psychologist worked as an informant for federal agents, and that her bosses regularly asked her to omit complaints to hide them from government audits. In early 2015 and again in December 2015, migrants at the center went on hunger strikes.”

Obama argued that sending the children to live with their relatives while giving them an ‘ankle bracelet’ to monitor them would only cost $17 a day compared to the $159 per day it cost to house a child in a detention center – or roughly $4800 per month per child – $58,000 per year!  And Obama wanted to expand the cost… why?  Most likely because he is a share holder through a series of offshore trust accounts.

So the disservice that Time Magazine, The Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, Mika Brzezinski and all the despicable faces in Hollywood  have conveniently forgotten – is the POLICY was not only created by the Obama Administration, but they fought tooth and nail to make it into a mega-business venture utilizing taxpayer funding! At $58,000 a head times 90,000 children – that translates to a $5.22 billion annual revenue…

US Communism: Buyer Beware

When everyone is ‘equal’, and no one is merited for their achievements, it is called “Communism”.  Communism by definition is the absence of social classes.  It advocates the ideology that the root of all problems in society stem from conflict between classes.  Common ownership.  Sharing no matter the labor, no matter the intellect.   Someone with an IQ of 180 is no different than one with an IQ of 80, and thus they may be deemed the exact same labor as determined by the dictatorship government. 

A valedictorian was denied his status despite his credentials because it might ‘offend’ those who didn’t achieve such heights.  It was deemed an unfair and unequal status and eliminated from the High School, East Wake High School, of North Carolina.

Firefighters have fought the communist agenda for decades as requirements were lowered in order to facilitate those who could not pass exams.

Imagine a doctor who was pushed through despite nearly failing every exam?  A politician who didn’t know politics?   A teacher who taught math without knowing basic principles… Of wait, that already exists.

Tolerance has come to mean – “everyone is capable even if they aren’t.

The means to crumble a society is to take away the achievers.

Sex education in the University of California now advocates porn for children as young as 10 or 12 stating that it is healthy and natural.   Yet, in the midst of the worst child sex trafficking ever known to man, somehow the university has no opinion.  Perhaps it is because those making these decisions were shuttled through the system barely able to read, but worthy of equality.

My generation has less than fond memories of this equality indoctrination when our children were in grade school and suddenly awards were granted to everyone no matter their performance.   It wasn’t about ‘winning or losing’, it was whether you showed up.

As all things do in this chaotic society, the pendulum swung so far left, the clock stopped working.

Other countries do not follow this model.  In fact, Germany follows a more purist version of Communism by having the government decide what each student is qualified to do based on their exams at a young age. Once this decision is determined, the child is pushed through his formative education accordingly.  Some are allowed to go to college, others to trade school, and still others are provided simply labor employment – as pre-determined by the Bundestat.

When Russia was Communist, Germany and the US were quite vocal in their denunciation.  And then the shift, the tectonic shift occurred and subtly a New Order was imposed.  So subtle that most didn’t even notice – until it was too late.

We wonder why our country continues to fall in marks, why our youth can’t get jobs, why we don’t excel as compared to even India and China…   Aghast, we have determined that it must be because we need more tolerance, more equality, more safe spaces, more condemnation of excelling, less distinction, less accolade, less…

There is a contingent of home schoolers in the US that have revolted.   And interestingly, the statistics show they excel better than public schoolers, more quickly, younger, and with 1/10 of the cost…

In Germany homeschooling is a crime punishable by jail and fines.

Why?  Because it circumvents the Order, it gives a child choice, it creates dreams, it opens doors.  And those attributes are considered a threat to the “International System of Norms”, aka, the New Order, The New World Order.

This Order advocates a shift of power, not naturally, but irrationally demanded and chaotically created.

The Bible is rather specific that God is Order, and thus, by default, chaos is evil, is sin.

When we hear the depravity from the tongues of Hollywood arrogance, I think most of us are saddened, more than angered, because we see how far they have strayed, how vile is their walk, and how defamed is their soul.   And as the Swamp is cleared more each day, we see that their defamation comes from their sins – the mirror.

And so as we watch the unfolding of the very imperfect Trump, I think it is worthy to note, that his agenda, his heart, in all that is Trump, is working toward the benefit of anti-Communism, and the freeing of an enslave nation.

 

US Trade Deficit: Began absolute tanking in 1992.  The Billy Years.

As of 2009, US school performance lagged in 29thplace behind Latvia, Korea, Brazil and Chile…

Only 14-15% of US students even enroll to college

It is projected that the cost of a US MBA will rise by 400% between now and 2021.

Since 1980, the cost of one year of college in the US has risen by 600%.

Wile looking’ at the value added of a college education in the US, the statistics show a declining curve.

The bottom line is a system that is rapidly nearing complete implosion, while advocating for greater implosion…   It is such a disservice to our youth and yet, the same Hollywooders and Politicians who create this chaos, do have an agenda.  But it isn’t the benefit of our next generation, it is the systemic fall of society in the US and the EU so as to reinvent Communism as the ‘savior’.

 

 

“Buyer Beware”.

“Ostrich with your head in the sand – Beware”.

Merkel: Failed Values Amidst a Purveyor of Fake News

After Merkel openly ushered in millions of immigrants between 2015 and 2017 at the behest of Soros, she is visibly backtracking.  Austria is urging border protections, Italy is shipping immigrants to Spain, and Merkel is mumbling that she needs to talk to Brussels before she is allowed to say anything, because, well, she doesn’t know what Soros wants anymore…

After the EU decried “FOUL” because Trump suggested that the US should no longer be responsible for Europe’s military, the EU Commission under Juncker’s instructions announced a European Defense Fund that would not protect anyone outside the EU.   Of course, the decision to create EDF was due to border threats. Apparently EDF financing will be progressive and use taxpayers as the basis for what would be a new tax…(I wonder if they know this yet)?. Juncker is demanding member states ante up 5.5 billion Euro per year after 2020, and 2.56 billion per year beginning err, last year, although no one has actually contributed anything – yet.

Germany’s foreign minister, Maas, has issued his counter measure to Trump’s America First by stating, Europe First!  Mentioning ‘values and interests’ as his platform is a bit mystifying given Germany is forced to admit that they will fail to meet the goals of the Paris Climate Accord by 2020. Oops.

Maas, who is head of Germanys Social Democratic Party, must also answer for his party’s decision to offer ‘feminist porn’ for free on public broadcasting stations throughout Germany as a means of equalizing divisive sexist pornography which is apparently a favorite pastime beginning at the age of 13.  This value comes on the heels of massive child sex trafficking allegations.

Merkel is arguing the Trudeau platform regarding trade with the US by complaining that although the US does have deficits in the trade of goods, it does not in the trade of services. Foremost, this does not even address ‘tariffs’, but secondly it fails to address the fact that trade in services generates tax revenue for the country that is receiving the service as well as jobs.

According to a document released by the European Parliament in 2015, trade in services is a very gray area given valuations are estimates, can vary widely by country in methodology of valuation, and are not a verifiable number.  In addition, ‘intellectual property’ is definitively a varying value that can be worth billions until it’s patent expires which in the pharma industry is roughly 7-10 years.   The vast majority of trade falls within what is called ‘category iii, or (c)’ referenced as:  “…a service provider of one party through a commercial presence in the territory of any other party”.  This means that a commercial establishment of the US would have created a facility in another country, such as a bank or a pharmaceutical company.  Such company would likely employ staff within the host country and generate taxable revenue.

The TISA agreement (Trade in Services Agreement) which is the basis of all Service Trade is ensnared in ‘secrecy’ which makes the rules and negotiations completely confidential and lacking in transparency.  Thus identifying the services and how they are valued is of little merit.

And lastly, Germany’s values have been purged again.  It has come to haunt Merkel that she has failed to address the ramifications of a German cult that was organized in Chile wherein children were kidnapped, enslaved, tortured, and sexually abused since – 1961.  Despite the Chilean government requesting Germany to resolve the ongoing problem and establish a fund for the survivors – Merkel has apparently failed to do anything at all although her government has promised, pinky swear, to develop a plan of action as of June 30th.

For Merkel to continually create an arrogant aura of superior values, superior knowledge, and a superior attitude with regard to all the above Germany First structures, in reality she embodies a truly abysmal failed Leadership built on fake censored media which is monitored and edited by Soros – DW.com.

G7: Free Trade = No Tariffs, says Trump.

John McCain feels it is his voice of reason in siding with Trudeau’s stupidity that is of merit.  In his recent Tweet storm he declared, “…Americans remain pro-free trade and pro-globalization…”  But McCain can not speak for Americans because he lost, his Hillary ticket lost, and his ‘values’ lost.   In fact, Trump offered up the most pro-free trade terms possible – NO TARIFFS.   That is truly – Free!

Of course, it doesn’t meet the international systems of norms, in which the US must be heavily mistreated to the financial advantage of the EU and Canada.  Blustering with indignation, Merkel and Trudeau , as politicians, were beaten at their own game, and in defense sputtered like children on the playground, ‘well my daddy can beat up your daddy’…

The larger issue at stake is not the tariffs, it is the ‘norms’, it is about losing control, and thus power. 

Trump is a businessman, a negotiator, he isn’t a politician and he isn’t diplomatic, nor does he want to be or care.   There is only one way to deal with Trump – on his ground as a businessman. Period.  Because Merkel and Trudeau have never done anything other than politicking their entire lives, they don’t have a clue how to handle the nuance.  Merkel continues to threaten alliance with Russia, while simultaneously refusing to lift sanctions per the request of the Austrian PM, and by refusing to allow Russia back into the G8.  Why?  Because her threat is most likely air that she would rather not breath.  And because MI6 can’t allow it.

Tied within the entire circle is – Soros.  The man who most likely was running the Swamp CIA, who hates Russia, who wants Putin dead, and will do anything to create a false reality that Russia is the true ‘evil’.

So both Putin and Trump are calling Merkel’s bluff. 

While Soros is running the show and fuming like Wile E. Coyote, when the Road Runner suddenly stops and Wile E. finds himself splattered at the bottom of a cliff…  Trump is looking down and decrying, “beep, beep…”

The ball is in fact in Merkel’s court.  If she aligns with Russia, she has to give them the G8 back, she has to lift sanctions, and she has to render Soros impotent.  Poland, Hungary, Slovenia, Italy, Austria have all announced their support to align with Russia.   And because Merkel is a politician, not a businesswoman, she is waiting for instructions, like the true Communist of her upbringing, “tell me vat to do”.

What to do..what to do…? Threaten more tariffs against the US. Sigh.  Not a good move Merkel, because to lift them she will appear weak, and weakness, the appearance thereof, is the core of the game.

The chinny chin comment by Merkel that she is delighted that Trudeau is on her side is equally silly. Trudeau is ruled by the UK.  The UK is ruled by MI6.   May is ruled by MI6.   They do as they are told, walk when they are told, and talk with the intelligence of AI.  Beep, beep.

We are not impressed.

This is the same UK that has imprisoned Tommy Robinson without cause, simply because he dares to speak against the government policies.  The same UK that scurried away with the Skripals, claimed they were poisoned by Russia, refused access by Russia or the US, and refused any interviews whatsoever.   The same UK that has refused to indict any ‘living’ politician in the ongoing child and sex trafficking case that has dragged on an historically 35 years! This is the same UK that created the Trump Dossier…

And we want them as our faithful and compassionate – ally?

Ally in what?

Ally in the Swamp?

Ally in the international systems of norms?

Ally in bombing to smithereens Yemen?  Without one shred of reasoning…

Ally that collaborated to create a Hillary Presidency?

The EU is NOT what it has created itself to appear to be.   I doubt it defends the words of The People, any more than McCain does the American people. 

So.  Pro-Trade?  Then no tariffs would seem a good solution, let everyman play the game!

Globalization?   A Ponzi word that means – international systems of norms.   As defined by – Soros, the Cabal, and the Mafia.   Because, now the Mafia has demanded their cut in the picture, the scheme, and given their subtle means of making sure they get what they want, the cabal is an inclusive vehicle.  Smile. Tolerant.

IDIOTS.  You expect more from the globalists who claim to rule the world… Right?

G7 Summit Ruled by EU Commission

The G7 Summit is taking place in Quebec under the tutelage of Trudeau.   The purpose of the Summit is to talk about global topics chosen this year by Trudeau to include:  ocean pollution, trade tariffs, and climate change.  The Summit was originally created in 1973 by George Schulz.  It was to be attended by the finance ministers of four countries;  West Germany, UK, US and France.  It has historically evolved to include Canada, Italy, Japan, and Russia, although Russia was expelled in 2014.  

The President’s of these countries basically get together, have some food, meander around the property, and talk.  The only spouse to accompany her husband was Macron’s.  After two days, they go home and nothing changes.  From the perspective of a businessman, it is a huge waste of time.  From the perspective of the various politicians attending it gives them airtime. For Macron, it gives him hug time.

For example, in February 2009, the group of finance ministers met in Rome and pledged to take all necessary steps to stem the financial crisis.  That was the sum total of the meeting.  Seems to me a phone call could have accomplished that at a considerable fraction of the cost.

But it has become a media hype and everyone wears their Sunday best.  Furthering division, the summit conspicuously omits other global countries; Ireland, India, Scotland, The Netherlands, China, Russia, Spain, Portugal, Brazil, etc.., etc…  Instead it is more of a good ol’ boy platform wherein tradition is the only rationale.

The end result of this meeting seems to be that Trump and the EU will talk about trade in two weeks. Macron thinks the US should be expelled from future summits.  And as representative for ALL EU countries, Merkel stated that they all agree Russia should remain expelled.  I wonder if the ‘other countries’ were notified of their agreement before or after her statement?

Apparently, the new PM of Italy, Giuseppe Conte, stated that he felt Russia should be reinvited. However, the EU Council President, Donald Tusk, speaking on behalf of Conte said that Italy would toe the line and be a follower, not a leader.  I wonder if Conte is royally miffed!

Why would the EU Commissioner and EU Council President be at the G7?  They are not countries. 

In 1977, the UK PM, James Callahan, made the unilateral decision to henceforth include the EU Council and EU Commission as a part of the summit.  Supposedly, Juncker and Tusk are there as a united front to represent the remaining EU countries that are not invited.  Why?   Why not let sovereign nations speak for themselves?   Because in reality they are not sovereign, their voice is censored.

If the G7 Summit is really about the EU, and given Canada is a parcel of the Queen of England, why would the US or Russia have any desire to participate?  Both Tusk and Juncker are representatives of ‘open society’ and globalization.   They have collectively taken over the Summit which was originated in the US.

After losing a re-election bid in Poland, Tusk became the EU Council President.   He has since been openly accusatory that the current President of Poland and his conservative party are puppets of Putin.  In addition, he claims that the EU values are quite polar opposite from the values of Poland under conservatism and nationalism. In 2017, Juncker initiated an investigation into the President and his Party claiming ‘judicial independence concerns’.  

The bottom line is the fact that according to the EU any country that is not governed by a Socialist Party towing the line of the EU ‘values’, is operating under a fascist government and sanctions will be levied including being stripped of voting rights.

Hungary is also facing potential sanctions by the EU for their stance on conservatism.   Hungary has come under attack for expelling Soros and refusing to bow to the EU demands for African immigrant quotas.

Slovakia is facing condemnation for similar stances.

BREXIT is meaningless as long as Theresa May continues to be a pawn of MI6 and the Merkel.  What is more relevant is the growing number of countries that are standing up to the Royal Arm of the EU Commission and Council who tend to act much like the Wizard of Oz – behind a red curtain.

Which country in the EU will be next?

Trump Battling World Economic Forum

An “ex-Chancellor” to Austria, Wolfgang Schuessel, has stated that Europe should stand up to the US and defend it’s right to be nationalist… while continuing to accept huge handouts and unbalanced trade tariffs, because this is the “international system of norms”!  WHAT?

He went on to threaten that if the US does not shackle itself to these norms, that Europe will woo Russia.

He acquired his position as Chairman of his party by staging a leadership coup in which he ousted Erhard Buseck.  While president of the European Council in 2006, Schuessel convinced Merkel to make Austria the ‘little Germany’.  He is a member of the World Economic Forum, a group of businessmen who come together to determine what the world will do on any given day.  Members meet annually to discuss a pre-determined topic such as:  Building The Network Society, Shaping The Global Agenda, The Reshaping of The World and the 2018 topix – Creating A Shared Future In A Fractured World.

While most of the attendees, all of whom must pay a hefty fee, are corporate CEO’s whose company’s have a threshold of $5 billion or more per the rules, there is a standout oddity – Bono.  As in the singer.

Apparently, Trump has ruffled the feathers of the World Economic Forum and it’s elitist members whose only function is to figure out how they can make more money via the ‘international system of norms’.

Norms by philosophical definition are persuasions.   Slavery was a norm because it was an accepted institution by societal consensus. Then it wasn’t – and so it was no longer the norm.   Global Warming went through the stage of emergence, was then supported through dominant persuasion, and ultimately was accepted by the globalists as an international norm.   It served a purpose.

According to, Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, norms are initially created by entrepreneurs or architects.  They are then promoted by NGO’s and international organizations, like the World Economic Forum, the UN, the EU Commission, etc…  These organizations are tasked with building the emerging norm, and promoting it for a particular agenda until it passes through the various stages and is adopted as the norm law by the International Community.     The final process requires utilization of the media to feed the public this newly minted norm without realizing that perhaps it has no substance. 

We have been bred to be sheep to the global elites, mindless, and when we are caste they may come to our rescue like a shepherd.   They are the gods of mythology – in their minds.

So when the members of the World Economic Forum sit down to discuss the world and international systems of norms, Trump, and by default the US, is obviously a hefty topic.   He is disrupting the norm.   Which collapses their sovereign power, and thus the manipulation of markets, trade, currencies, and $$$$, not for the benefit of the people, but for the benefit of them.   We are used as chattel, as laborers, to support their norms.  Their norms would also include the normalizing of porn, drugs, and human trafficking as they become bored and their appetites require fetish fixations.

So when you don’t think Trump is doing enough, understand the magnitude of The Forum, understand they have no conventional boundaries, and understand that our media has been completely compromised.   

In a recent Sarah Sanders media blitz, one of the actual posed questions was whether she could convince Trump to NOT Twitter for even one day.   Instead they want him to come before them personally and take questions.   Of course, the question was ludicrous.  But an interesting statement by Sanders says it all – basically Trump uses Twitter so everyone in the world can hear what he has to say without it being botched, misquoted, out of context quoted, or misaligned.  Twitter would dare not delete his status, so it is actually quite brilliant.

Trump’s use of Twitter is also outside the international systems of norms.

UN: US Poverty Is Trump’s Fault

The UN has appointed an Australian professor who moved to the US to teach at NYU, because he prefers the wages, to denigrate the abysmal poverty in the US as a result of Trump policies. Using figures through 2016, which would cover through the Obama administration, Special Rapporteur, Philip Alston, is actually imposing these numbers on Trump because he ‘believes’ the Trump policies will negatively impact poverty…

One such statistic he quotes is the fact that 41 million people in the US or 12.7%, live in poverty, while 1/3 are children – the highest for any industrialized nation.   Digging a bit more we find that the census also states that 20% of those people are non-citizens and 10% are naturalized citizens. In addition 30% of those in poverty are not working at all, 25% have not graduated from high school, and 15.4 million of adults not working have a disability.  Of course these statistics are – from the Obama era…

If we extrapolate the non and naturalized citizens the figure is reduced to roughly 9% overall.   Nearly half that of Germany…  Oops.

Statistically, Australia, the home country of Philip Alston, has a rather abysmal record of it’s own that should be illustrated:   In 2014, the poverty rate was 12.8%, social assistance payments had not increased since 1994, poverty rates were growing, the indigenous population suffer the greatest and ¼ of their homeless are children under the age of 18.

But Australia prefers not to measure poverty and does not provide a real number, estimates are speculative and statistically defined by private organizations. Obviously, they would rather not discuss this issue with the world at large…or the UN.

Germany as well refuses to measure poverty on a national level although charities indicate the rise of poverty is indicative of ‘unemployment’ (gosh darn, how many committees were necessary to determine that tidbit) and as of 2014 was estimated to be 15.5%.   That would be before the massive immigration policies of Merkel which would have added an additional 2.5 million to the roles or roughly 3.4%, increasing the poverty level to about 19%.  Hmmm, ten points higher than the extrapolated US rate.

Oddly, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, hasn’t remarked on these Australian or German issues, nor is he remarking on Obama, Bush and Clinton policies wherein the US poverty rate was roughly 13.2%, instead he is blaming the US rates on – Trump. Within his own version of ‘extrapolations’ that he has not presented in any mathematical or statistical manner.

Presenting his report to the UN later this month, Alston visited Puerto Rico, rural Alabama and Skid Row.

Skid Row sits in the heart of LA. The elected mayor, Eric Garcetti is a Democrat whose alma mater includes, the London School of Economics.   Prior to his election, he served on the California Board for Human Rights Watch, a Soros funded organization.   LA continues to have the highest poverty rate of any large city in the US which does not extrapolate for the high cost of living.  Alston’s report does not mention these statistics.

Puerto Rico is by far the worst off with a poverty rate at 46% despite the World Bank classifying it as a ‘high income economy’. It is however, not a part of the US, but is a US territory meaning it’s highly inefficient government is guided by regulations and laws of the US Federal government.  

In June 2016 Obama instituted PROMESA in Puerto Rico which included: an oversight board, reduction of minimum wage, increased austerity programs, and non-governmental interference.   The ‘oversight board’ is a committee of 7 appointed by President Obama to make sure the government doesn’t spend money on stuff it shouldn’t… the board includes some bankers, Jerry Brown’s former Finance Director, and a few US law professors.  It isn’t working very well.

Alabama is a country of its own. Poverty dates back hundreds of years made worse by the Civil War and Reconstruction.   Many left the state and only tenants were left to scrounge a living off land they didn’t own requiring children to work instead of go to school, and a descension into Hell ensued. Despite numerous programs aimed at bringing jobs, skills and education, the state continued to fall behind dramatically.

While Wikipedia claims that ‘white rural interests’ dominated the government policies including slave cropping, a quick look found that the Democrat Party ruled Alabama up until 1987.    The economy began expanding in 1990 with the automobile industry being the primary driver followed by steel, iron, paper and lumber. In addition, a driver for expanding commercial interests is the fact that Alabama has a significantly low individual and corporate tax rate, ranking it the second lowest in the country.

While Mr. Rapporteur Alston would focus on these three particular areas as demonstrative negatives is curious.   The fact that the issues underlying poverty in all three can date back hundreds of years is even more curious…  Unless the greater agenda is to create a dark cloud over Trump…   While Republican capitalism has begun to draw Alabama out of its dirge, Democrat policies continue to manage LA and Puerto Rico.

Even curiouser and curiouser is the fact that the Trump administration has basically instituted a tax policy whereby the first $25,000 of a married couple’s income is taxed at $0 can be observed as a failure by Alston would bring to question his intellect and/or common sense.  

Maybe He Didn’t Do his Homework while at London School of Economics…

Soros Proposes Marshall Plan Coup For Africa Via EURO Devaluation

Only two US Presidents in history have been impeached;  Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson.  Nixon resigned before impeachment processes could be initiated.   Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice when he lied to a grand jury and then attempted to force others to lie on his behalf.   Johnson was impeached for dismissing his secretary of war without judicial process through the senate.

Clinton was acquitted by the Senate despite the fact that he admitted his guilt.  Johnson was also acquitted.

Technically, no President has ever been impeached.  I imagine it is more about the preservation of legacy and the government pension than one of innocence. 

When Hillary was in the running for President there was much talk about whether she would pardon all her crimes.   The consensus was that Constitutionally, there is no reason she could not pardon her crimes, she could not pardon her impeachment because that is under the rule of the senate and house.  After impeachment, a President would be subject to trial and judgment, at that point he no longer holds the powers of President and can not pardon himself.   However, any crimes committed prior to an impeachment can be pardoned under Article II, Section 2.

Why is this relevant?   Soros does not sit still.   Apparently, the media is glutinously reporting on frivolous news, while the real stories remain obscured.  Censorship has been in effect for decades, we have only just become aware.

It is the preamble for why the Maxine Waters of the world screech for impeachment, because only then would Trump be subject to potential trial and judgment.  And only then can the US be saved for the advent of the Socialist regime change.

So while the New York Times splashes a politically devisive statement that “Trump and His Lawyers Embrace A Vision of Vast Executive Power”, they ignore the global implications of Soros new agenda for Europe and Africa.   Of course, the purposeful folly of Alice in Wonderland scavenger hunts while massive economic spins are being unraveled is an age old tactic employed by The Swamp as administered by the Swamp Master – Soros.. 

Could it be that while the world turns, the media is left spinning “Un-News”? 

In the midst of the trade imbalances currently being negotiated, Vladimir Putin has announced that Soros intends to manipulate Euro volatility.   Multiple outcomes would be generated.   A devalued Euro increases EU exports and reduces sovereign debt burdens.   It would also have the effect of increasing US trade deficits.  But devaluing a currency can also trigger other countries into a tit-for-tat race which could ultimately spur another recession.   In time for the 2020 election…

And thus the objective for a New Day hero to save us from ourselves – Soros.

The key is the fact that Putin said “volatility” not devaluation.  In other words, playing the forex as in trading currencies.   This year, the Euro has dropped roughly 10% with shorts reaching 43%.   The British pound is also on a downward stretch having risen significantly between May of last year and January 2018.   Trend lines indicate the bearish cycle will continue.

In a May speech before the European Council on Foreign Relations, Soros staged his ‘dire diagnosis’ for the EU which he says began as a result of the migration chaos.  Short term memory – he ordered Merkel to open Germany’s borders – and she complied.  But Soros doesn’t care about what he said – only what he says now.

Soros has a plan that he outlined to save the EU and thus the world from the current crisis that he helped create: 

He wants to institute a Marshall Plan for Africa in which the EU will ante up over $35 billion per year for an indeterminate length of time so as to build up an economically viable African nation.  In order to do this the EU must abandon the concept of ‘austerity’ and use its credit rating to borrow funds from financial entities, like Soros Fund Management, and staunch the flight of capital from emerging market currencies.

The way to finance this new debt is a devalued currency which makes the cost of existing debt – less.  Currently, Germany’s debt load costs roughly $53 billion Euro per year, France and Spain are equivalent, Italy is over 90 billion.    Devaluing the euro equates to a devalued interest burden.   Given a burden of about 250 billion per year in these four EU countries alone – a Euro currency devaluation would create 25 billion in ‘excess’ funds that Soros would allocate to Africa… via his Marshall Plan which in essence he already put into effect January 2018.

Putting tariffs on the EU countries could help mitigate the currency devaluation.   Somewhat.

The effects of the Marshall Plan implemented by the US on behalf of Europe after WWII has been much debated.   It succeeded in allowing American businesses to capitalize on government subsidies to Europe.  And it gave the US government power over the governments of Europe.

Taking control of Africa’s development is a coup of vast proportions, but Soros has never been one to do things in a small way.