RACISM: Warren and Harris Blatant Disregard of Truth – Black Women Maternal Mortality

This past week Elizabeth Warren, a white feminist, and Kamal Harris, a Jamaican/Indian feminist, participated in a lecture at Texas University. The primary topic concerned the variance in mortality of black vs white women post delivery.   Both Warren and Harris agreed that the basic cause of this 300% disparity was “Racism”.  

According to Warren, this tragedy is completely the result of racial prejudice and all doctors and nurses across the US are guilty.   She cites the availability of insurance as a root cause.  Harris, in conjunction with John Podesta’s, Center for American Progress, advocate for a ‘committee’ to be formed to monitor data. The reason? Despite the data being stated as fact by the CDC, according to NIH, the US has not released maternal mortality rates since 2007. Therefore, we don’t really know…and the data collected by the CDC is based on estimates and maybes.

But it must be “Racism”.

Warren’s plan, based on unreleased data, is to introduce incentives; a doctor or nurse who saves the life of a black woman gets a bonus. Remember how the teacher’s unions fought like Banshees against the radical conservative idea of incentivizing teachers?   It was considered racist.  Well, obviously no one told Warren.

The problem with both Harris and Warren’s proposals is they have cherry-picked the data that is available, and omitted factual evidence:

Here is what they left out according to the National Partnership For Women and Familes:

  1. Black women are 3 times more likely to have fibroids at a very young age which can cause post-partum hemorrhaging.
  2. Black women have a much higher rate of ‘preeclampsia’ than white women, which left untreated can lead to high blood pressure and death.
  3. Black women experience physical ‘weathering’ at a much faster rate than white women, meaning their bodies age faster, meaning they are higher risk.
  4. 75% of Black women deliver at hospitals that cater predominantly to blacks. These hospitals are considered ‘inferior’ and staffed by black physicians and nurses – so the race card is completely false.
  5. Black women are less likely to even seek out pre-delivery care for themselves and do not alter lifestyle choices.
  6. Black women have a significantly higher rate of unintended pregnancies, which may be complicated by drug use and alcohol use. (the solution according to the paper – more abortions).
  7. Many Black women live in abject poverty and do NOT have good health, good diets, and therefore create a harmful environment during and after pregnancy.

No amount of doctor and nurse incentivizing will have one hoot on these outcomes. But racism is the Democrat mantra feeding false information and fake news to a society that believes that all white people are the wrecking ball and generalizations are ‘unfair’… because they create division.

Election 2020 has begun!

In the midst of the New York Times posting extremely anti-Semitic cartoons depicting Netanyahu in a very negative way, the New York Times posts an article titled: A Rising Tide of Anti-Semitism. “In 2016 we saw a 34% increase over the prior year in acts of harassment, vandalism, or violence directed at Jewish individuals and institutions. During the first three quarters of 2017, there was a 67% increase over the same period in 2016. We’ve seen double the number of incidents in K-12 schools, and almost a 60% increase on college campuses.”

US Democrats have increasingly voiced anti-Semitic views, voted against Israel, and still the vast majority of Jewish people in the US vote Democrat.   Time and again it has been shown that most US Jewish people identify themselves according to a culture, not a religion, and thus Israel is meaningless to them.

But the Racist and Anti-Semitic agenda’s have always been a radical ploy of the liberals in creating and propagandizing false information for political gain.

What Warren and Harris fail to address is the fact that Hispanics are the largest group to be uninsured, and yet have a lower maternal mortality rate than blacks – or whites.

In 2013, before Obamacare, the trend in US pregnancy mortality had risen from 7.2 in 1987, to 15.9 per 100,000. After Obamacare, as of 2018 that rate rose to 22. The insurance card was just obliterated.

We are left with two core causal factors;   1.   Black women are less likely to seek prenatal care, and 2.   Black women have health issues that create a mortality risk.   Neither Harris or Warren have advocated for these factors to be mitigated.   Thus both Warren and Harris are proposing solutions that will solve nothing and could therefore be considered ‘Racist’ given they are well aware of the true facts per the report issued by: National Partnership For Women and Families.   This organization is at the forefront of Obamacare, Planned Parenthood, and has a comprehensive list of Liberal speakers including; Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Madelaine Albright, Christiane Amanpour, Rosie O’Donnell etc…

Obviously given this very left-leaning report, the very left leaning Warren and Harris are aware of the true statistics…

EU African Colonial Reparations

With the global flap in the wind Climate Change Fund errr, flapping, the EU has found a new and improved way to prop up their financing the redistribution of wealth agenda – “Colonialism Reparations”.

Another good reason for the UK BREXIT given they could be one of the biggest EU targets…

The gist of the bill is based on EU Afrophobic attacks.  The term, Afrophobic, conjures up  unjust prejudicial and racial ideologies in line with Islamaphobia.  Except that Afrophobia is related to ‘anyone of African descent’.   Each ‘national authority’ would thus be required to provide proper “education, housing, health, criminal justice, political participation and migration”.

The reasoning behind the gem of the bill is that the EU created colonialism and slavery throughout Africa and must be held accountable.

What this bill does not seem to address is the fact that hate crimes can occur against any race or culture including Jews, Whites, Christians, women, etc…  Therefore, creating an African agenda is actually quite blatantly – racial and prejudicial.

What is the real purpose?

  1. It opens the door to possible reparations being made to African states in the form of monetary aid.  Given the fall of funding for Climate Change that was being filtered to Africa, and the need for infrastructure to support the current colonialism land grabs, Africa has lost significant $$$$.   As the cabal took control of large swathes of land in Africa for pennies per hector, pushing out the local farmers, they required infrastructure in order to market their new machinized farms.   The Paris Accord Green Fund flapped, and money dried up.  Thus, a new agenda needed to be created to address the cabal’s need to have funding provided by taxpayers instead of from their own wallets.
  2. It creates an even larger welfare budget within individual EU countries that would become the burden of viable taxpayers further spiraling the EU economy into oblivion.
  3. It demonizes nationals as being the aggressors and victimizes immigrants further suppressing the criminal activities that are decimating entire cities throughout Europe.

The EU Commission rarely operates on a level that is not embedded in an alternate agenda.  And this instance is no different than any other.  The media coverage is slim with respect to hate crimes perpetrated by immigrant Afrikaners.  Most governments, specifically Germany’s, have adopted rules for quashing anything related to immigrant crimes.  The police are forced to release perpetrators, and statistically, they are prohibited from making any arrest which could skew the crime rates.

According to Germany’s Deutsche Welle, there were 800 attacks on Muslims last year.  By contrast, the first nine months of 2018 saw 1000 attacks on Jews.  There are roughly 117,000 Jews in Germany, while there are roughly one million Afrikaners (statistics are not available because Germany does not believe in profiling – numbers are based on an estimate done in 2013 before the massive immigration).

Similarly, in France it is illegal to conduct a census that queries race or color, therefore a proper statistic that would qualify as either Islamaphobia or Afrophobic is completely and utterly impossible.  Making the EU Commission’s bill nonsensical and without a shred of basis.

In addition, given Germany doesn’t profile, the number of attacks on Afrikaners could include black on black which would not be racial at all.

The agenda is obviously far from the purported EU Commission statement.  But as we watch Merkel and the growing possibility of her early resignation, it will be interesting to see where she chooses to reside as her country falls…

Facebook and Twitter: Hate Speech Police

In some Middle Eastern countries morality police, or vice squads, enforce Sharia law to promote virtue. In the US, Twitter and Facebook have announced that they are the self-appointed speech police determining what is morally acceptable, who should be punished, and even going so far as to direct those whose mindsets are not aligned to their dictum shall be sentenced to a clinic so as to undo the brainwash of conservatism and national pride.

Life After Hate is the organization Facebook refers members to for rehabilitation.   Based in Chicago, it was founded in 2011, funded by the Obama administration, and dedicated to the elimination of white power ideologies. Backed by the controversial Southern Poverty Law Center, the organization is in it’s core – racist. Focusing exclusively on ‘white power’, Life After Hate claims that Neo-Nazism and skinheads are the focus of their ExitUSA program.

But Facebook and Twitter have expanded that definition to include what they term ‘white nationalism’.   Apparently ‘black nationalism’ is not racist because it is ‘cultural’.   Black feminism is also not racist, although it is nationalist.   Chicano Nationalism is also not considered racist because ‘it is an ideology, not a political movement’.   But White Nationalism is now defined by Facebook and Twitter as Neo-Nazism and aligned with skinheads…

Facebook and Twitter have thus exposed themselves as being ‘racist’ – against white culturalism.   Perhaps they should subject their racism to the AI analytics.

National pride is considered a vice that must be eradicated.   Despite the fact that it does not define as a color, it is termed a color movement by the media, the same media that upholds the anti-semitism voice of Ilhan Omar.

And the inane hypocrisy continues.

Twitter has stated that politicians are exempt from this censorship because their speech is worthy of public interest – but citizens must be deleted. Oddly, calls for death and dismembering, rape and assault by Hollywoodites falls under the Twitter code of worthy of public interest.

Given Trump’s penchant for tweeting, I doubt that he will put up with any interference from the Liberal Twitter veil on speech by it’s Executive Chairman, Omid Kordestani. Kordistani is an Iranian well entrenched in the Globalist scheme as he was groomed by the best – Google. Infamous for manipulating the search engine schematic on behalf of Hillary Clinton, Goggle and its ‘allies’ continue to use their supremacy to further the demise of Constitutionally protected free speech.

In the midst of this censorship revelation, the same outlet that self described itself as the racist police identifying organizations it termed ideologically upholding hate, has been caught in its own vise.   The Founder of SPLC has been forced to resign, it’s President and legal Director have resigned, amid allegations of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and racism have been levied.

Funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, Open Society Foundation, Cisco Systems, Grousbeck Foundation etc…, the Southern Poverty Law Center has used its massive connections to create a list of hate groups, primarily conservative, to delude and vilify their viability.   Rooted in Socialism and Communism, the original founders were racist, radicals who embraced Marxism.   Many of the organizations on its list of hate groups were found to be either nonexistent, inactive, or existing in name only.

Despite a history mired in fakery, the SPLC has routinely been quoted as a source by Mainstream Media new sites.

In 2013, the Swampland FBI endorsed the SPLC as a ‘partner’ in battling hate crime.   On it’s website, the FBI listed as a resource, the SPLC. During this same period, the Justice Department was supporting and funding the Facebook antidote: Life After Hate. Their government grant funding was immediately suspended under President Trump.  But the circle continues.

The enormous risk Facebook and Twitter giants face by their self proclamation of speech police, while aligning with a neo-nazi self help organization, is the same possible outcome as that of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Massive lawsuits are sure to be levied.  Zuckerberg, who is already fighting left calls for his resignation, could find himself embroiled in monumental legal ranglings that call for the complete takedown of the platform.   It is a stupid move, but the Left is more and more desperate to censor any form of conservative voice.

Hate speech is not illegal in the US.   Censorship is.

FYI:   despite the fact that Life After Hate bills itself as a 501(c)(3) which must post it’s 990 forms online – it has failed to do so and is thus in violation of its IRS tax status.

RACISM: An African History of Slave Lords

A man in a coffee shop. A white Muslim woman wearing a Burqua.  An exchange of heated words. Fear.   A conversation that escalates.  He says he doesn’t like her religion.  She says that in Luke 19 Jesus said to kill the people of unbelief.  And suddenly the man is accused of hate speech and racism, and booted from the coffee shop.

Simultaneously, al-Zawahiri, the new leader of al-Qaeda, called on all Muslims to commit Jihad against the US as the first enemy of all Muslims.  Shhh, not a word.

Simultaneously, in Israel, 41 Palestinians are dead and over 700 wounded after they stormed Jerusalem in protest of Trump claiming it belonged to the Jews.  A violent and bloody encounter in which bombs were set, fires were flared and terrorism erupted.  Apparently, the Palestinian call to jihad is not racism.

Al Zawahiri has called for violence, and Muslims are responding in kind.

And yet, somehow, a man in a coffee shop is the focus.

The bottom line is that Hamas, al-Qaeda, ISIS, etc…, want all non-Muslims out of the Middle East – including Israel.   And they are willing to do anything to achieve that goal.   But somehow ‘racism’ is the man in a coffee shop.

Racism has become a target word, it is used to derail and denigrate and even to jail people who are no longer afforded the freedom of opinion.   If I don’t ‘like’ al Zawahiri, does that make me racist?   If I don’t approve of Burqua’s, does that make me racist?  White men are targeted continually in the media, their color and their gender boisterously declared to be unfit for existence.   But that isn’t racist…?

If M13 gang members want to kill me and I declare them to be evil, is that racist because their countries of origin are not white?

What is Racism?

First we have to define “Race”:    “A race is a grouping of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into categories generally viewed as distinct by society. First used to refer to speakers of a common language and then to denote national affiliations, by the 17th century the term race began to refer to physical traits.”

It would then follow that “Racism” is simply a means of categorizing this “grouping of a people who share common physical or social qualities”.  

Instead, racism has become a pejorative.   And somehow ‘white people’ are the only perpetrators and literally everyone of every other culture, faith, belief, color, and gender are the victims.  Despite the fact that racism, in its pejorative, has existed since the beginning of time, MSM has determined its roots to be firmly bound in the US.   And thus, it is termed an American institution.

Whoa there Cowboy!

In fact, research papers would have us believe that racism did not exist in the ancient cultures of Greek and Roman society, because they had ‘no concept of race or racial oppression’. WOW!

According to many such authors, race has been redefined and is only a reference between black and white.  Obviously, these authors fail the most basic tenant of definition – ‘race is a grouping of humans on shared physical or social qualities…”   There is no negative expression in this definition, there is only a classification.  Thus it would follow that these same authors are the ones responsible for creating a divisive black and white quality to the term ‘racism’.  When in fact it is typically these ‘shared social and physical qualities’ that cause people to group and form bonds when they are in a foreign atmosphere.   Chinatown is a classic example – it is a social preference wherein a shared culture can feel secure.

When Muslims came to Germany in France in hordes, they created their own spaces, blocks, neighborhoods within the cities.  They didn’t diverge and integrate.  When “expats” move to another country, the first thing they look for is the locale that harbors similar social and cultural peoples.

One Socialist writer went so far as to determine that capitalism created racism and that racism did not exist in the slavery of Jews in ancient times because it was not ‘color motivated’.    OUCH!

No one denies the color motivation that occurred in the US, including the slave trade.   But few remember their history enough to delve into the slave trade of the Barbary Coast in the 1600’s in which the African nations of  what are now known as Morocco, Libya, Algeria and Tunisia ritually raided the European coastal regions of Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, France, Ireland and England and captured and enslaved their victims, sometimes devastating entire towns.  Bringing them back to their respective African nation, the slaves that survived the tortuous journey would be inspected and sold based on their perceived physical qualities.

Africans and Middle Eastern societies have a sordid history of enslaving.

It wasn’t until the 17thcentury that European navies began to fight back against the African and Middle Eastern corsairs who at this point had trafficked, tortured and brutalized millions of predominantly white people.   This barbaric slave trade resulted in the galley slaves who were forced to row the ships of these Corsairs sitting in their own filth and excrement each day until they died.  Women were either used for housework or for sex, but were still required to beg on the streets for money to pay rent and buy their own food.

Was this racism?   It certainly was not a product of capitalism.  It was most definitely a social enslavement because it targeted Europe – not other African nations.  Therefore, it can be considered racist.  And – the perpetrators were not white.

Do I have the freedom of speech to state this piece of history?   Or will I be called a racist because I provide this as a reminder that white people were the victims of racism and slavery at the behest of Africans and Middle Eastern societies?  Will I be persecuted because the Barbary Coast enslavement that was perpetrated for roughly 300 years doesn’t fit the narrative of racism as a white American institution?  Will I be booted from Starbucks?  Vilified?

For Telling The Truth.

 

Athletes Who Are Heroes – don’t take a knee, they take action

Is there really racial discrimination or is it manufactured by the media?

Black athletes continue to take a knee and raise a fist of anger at the American National Anthem. The NFL commissioner said, “I truly respect our players wanting to speak out and change our community.”

But what have they changed? How have they bettered the community? Have they instilled a nationalist unity? Have they created solutions? Do they share their money with the ‘unequal’? Do they actively participate in the community? No, they simply draw attention to themselves and create an explosively negative atmosphere.

But not all players are equal…

Larry Fitzgerald puts his money and his time where his soft spoken mouth is by actually establishing camps through his First Down Fund. In addition he established the Carol Fitzgerald Memorial Fund in honor of his mother who died from complications of breast cancer. He has taken mission trips to Africa, India, Thailand and the Philippines to support economic development. He has gone on USO trips to raise money for wounded veterans. HE IS A HERO.

There is Albert Pujols who established a foundation to help families and children with Down Syndrome. There is Warrick Dunn who has donated millions to single parent families who can’t afford the downpayment for a home. Dikembe Mutombu who has donated over $15 million to build a hospital in his native Dominican Republic. Roberto Clemente who worked tirelessly to give money and food to the needy in Puerto Rico. THEY ARE HEROES.  And there are many more like them!

They did not take a knee at the National Anthem. They DID something pro-active.

Heroes are an important component of society, but we have lost sight of the definition. Today we give hero status to greedy, arrogant athletes who think that disrespect is ‘doing something’.   Or Black Lives Matter who claim on their website to be looking for non-violent means of protest while leaving a trail of dust, violence, fires, looting and assaults behind them. They collaborate with gangs – as in the Atlanta protests, and they have accomplished exactly nothing positive, instead instigating racial divide, loss of businesses, property damage and riots. How are they ‘heroes’?

Taking a knee represents a protest to social injustice. And while many vocal supporters say that we need to fix the problem instead of taking offense to the knee, they have an interesting perspective – ‘you fix the problem’ – while I and they disrespect our country. In some instances it has gone so far as to demand that all whites own their responsibility for slavery in the 1800’s and ante up.

So what do they actually want? Significant social change. What does that look like?

The major demand is to stop violence and racism. And while there are instances of police going rogue, they would seem to have no color associated with their rogueness. Most often it is rooted in fear, fear for their own life. And the only way to diminish that fear would be to clean up neighborhoods and target the cause – street gangs. How do you target street gangs? You meet youth at their prime – between the ages of 5 and 16. You provide alternatives, you educate and train and teach and train some more. You give single parent mother’s a chance.

But instead of training the youth, the root cause, Black Lives Matter, the kneeling athletes target the police. If you can’t recognize the root cause of the problem, then you are only solving the side effects and ultimately nothing will change. You can train the police all you want about being more sensitive, but as gangs continue to grow, mutate and multiply, all the police training will fly! There are now an estimated 1,150,000 gang members. The largest two are African-American; the Crips and the Bloods.

Systematically, these gangs unite to ‘take out cops’. In a recent protest in Atlanta, the Crips and Bloods and BLM all united to chant death to cops.

I’d say it was a fair assessment that such protests would NOT instill anti-racist beliefs and a more sensitive feeling toward targets and profiles. Gang shootings in Chicago this year have topped out over 3000 with 500 dead. Baltimore had its bloodiest year ever in 2015 with 344 murders.

Who is protesting these statistics?

No one because these statistics do not promote the agenda of racism or social injustice, they represent the cause and the cause is apparently unimportant…

Because the ‘cause’ isn’t the police, it isn’t racism, it isn’t even social injustice. The cause is the 65-75% of black fathers who abandon their sons and daughters, their wives and their responsibilities, leaving an ever widening gap of social inequality.

Kaepernick? He can’t relate at all. He was swept up into loving arms by a two parent household. He was given a privileged lifestyle and now earns millions of dollars. He has no social injustice. He has no value system. And those that follow should take a hard look at the REAL HEROES that represent the athletes actually doing something that has value, integrity, honor and unity.

Beyonce -Super Bowl’s Malcolm X

Imagine if the Super Bowl half time performance was a bunch of white people dressed up like the KKK advocating the annihilation of the black race?  Imagine the Outrage!  The Fallout!  The protests and riots that would ensue!

The tribute to Malcolm X by Beyonce is really no different given his absolute hatred of white people and his ideology that all white people must die. When the pendulum swings to such absurd maxims, the attitude is really not much different than ISIS. Ethnic cleansing – only the ethnicity is a race and the race is anyone with beige skin.

We accept this?

It is racist, it is inciting hate, it is inciting prejudice and terrorism, so why isn’t it prosecuted? Shouldn’t Beyonce have been arrested for her performance?

“In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.”

The lyrics were so provocative that they included a ‘warning’ for indecency… This is a prime time viewing period in which children of all ages will be in attendance. So why do the NFL organizers allows such drivel? Do they really think Beyonce’s racist rant will create a greater audience? Because personally, I knew of households who vowed to turn off their television during halftime just to protect their children from her extremist, hate speech.

By law, she should have been arrested. But the absolute hypocrisy is only heightened by the fact that she needed armed security guards, aka police, to escort her to the stage to rant about her hate for police, authority and everyone that isn’t black – as in Malcolm X. In true Hitler fashion, she advocates for black supremacy, death and anarchy. That is racist – and it is against the law.

Exactly who orchestrates these ‘family friendly shows’ that require warnings? Jordan Levin, CEO of Generate Content, LLC and President of Defy Media, LLC, is also the content organizer for the NFL since 2015 and was responsible for the half time debacle.   But that doesn’t explain the gross acceptance and media accolade of Beyonce’s hatred.

While there are more white people killed by police very year, the statistics are not equal. Given the disparity in percentages, blacks are more likely to be killed… yes, but they are also more likely to be the killer, the aggressor or perpetrator of violent crimes – disproportionately. Taking out the equation of drug arrests and focusing on violent crimes, blacks account for over 80%.  Despite that ‘profile’, the media is censored from releasing race data any longer because it is considered ‘racist’. If the victim is black, then it is not racist and the media is afrenzy with tributes to the black victim at the hands of a white perpetrator.

Why is the media so anti-white racist?

For one thing, it is a fashion statement – it is the generator of chaos – and it is based in a core of division and conquer. But Beyonce brings a fresh new hatred of white people to fresh new heights. Given she has an ethnic makeup that includes, white, Cherokee Indian, Creole, and French, it is odd that she would harness such a powerful animosity toward her own. She dies her hair white blond… but abhors whites who might sport an afro, citing that afros’ belong to blacks. But then Obama is half white and hates whites as well – and that’s not racist.  A double standard or simple hypocrisy?

She seems to hate with such aggressive venom and then decries foul when she feels blacks are the victim of hate. The immature hypocrisy she exudes is so flamboyantly childish it would be ridiculous if she were not given such notoriety as a half time event at the Super Bowl. While claiming to be Christian, I find it odd given Christianity does not embrace such racial hatred and even her devout friend Obama decries tolerance and embrace. It would appear she is one confused little girl whose education, or lack thereof, was refocused on narcissistic pursuits including the National Church of Bey, an organized church that ‘worships Beyonce’ and is a registered nonprofit entity… UGH!

We are afraid to say what is Truth in an effort at being ‘politically correct’, and not wanting to offend, and that attitude has gone to such extremes that it needs a major over-hawl of core ethics. Remember Gloria Steinem?  The woman is still outlandish in her commentary.  While the concept of equality is certainly important, taking the pendulum to the far extreme only serves to create a ‘new inequality’, and division through chaos.  No different. When an attitude is no longer about balance but encroaches on Fascism, it no longer deserves protection.

NFL shame on you for caving – I think she should have been arrested for racism and inciteful hate speech.

Mizzou Misery – A Tall Tale of Bullying Proportions

Is Missouri University racist? The media claim that their diversity of Black students is far below standards at 7%. Really? Let’s take a look.

Stanford is 3.7%, Harvard is 7%, Princeton claims 8.7%, Georgia Tech – 7%, Columbia University 5.5%, Duke University 10.9%, Texas A&M 2.8%, Loyola 3.8%, University of Denver 2.9%, University of Virginia 6.5%…

According to the Department of Education, about 39% of blacks enter college. Given the black population in the US represents about 12.3% of the total population, that would indicate that 4.8% of college enrollment would defer to the black population. Which means that many of these universities are over the quota, including Missouri.

So what is really going on?

Bullying. 18.5% of college students report being bullied, 22% report cyber bullying. Traditionally, college faculty are told to NOT interfere in bullying, as it is considered a right of passage and teaches a student how to deal with real world social adversity. According to the US Department of Education, given that both the victim and the perpetrator in bullying at the college level are adults, no crime is committed unless it involves a sexual nature. In a study done by Lynne McDougal on college bullying, she found that: “A majority of the bullying is reported as occurring in the same corridor or department, thus suggesting that students within the same groups, divisions or under the same faculty are responsible for the bullying of their peers.” This would indicate that a specific professor could be held accountable for allowing the purveyance to continue.

In the case of Mizzou, the claims were of a racial slur, a feces swastika, and the President allegedly bumping a protestor with his car after the group circled his vehicle and would not let him pass, and he failed to apologize.  The feces swastika can not be proven.  The bumping was alleged.  So we left with ‘a racial slur’ event.  As a result, two very prominent representatives of the university were forcibly resigned.  So who is the REAL BULLY?  And the hunger strike?  C’mon people, is that what an employee would do upon not receiving a raise from his boss? As in I’m going to go on a hunger strike until I get what I demand no matter who it costs and what it costs…  Where is the reality?

While bullying in the US is a very serious problem, it is not by any means simply ‘racial’. It crosses all lines; gender, sexuality, religious affiliation, race, ethnicity, gpa, appearance, hazing, nerd quotient, accent, height, weight, you name it and someone will find a reason.  I’ve been bullied, my kids were bullied, it is the nature of an ugly side to society.

What happened at Mizzou was not racial – this was bullying. Period.

According to Brian Van Brunt, President of the National Behavior Intervention Team Association, this is widespread and growing. Firing a school president and chancellor will NOT make any dent in the issue. The issue is in the fact that other students allow bullying, are privy to the bully, and do nothing. According to Van Brunt, bystander intervention is the best way to fight the problem. Where were all these protestors and faculty members when the bullying was going on at Mizzou? What prevention did they employ? What remediation did they attempt to implement? Were school counsellors involved? Were the bully’s ever identified?

Is it the job of a university president to intervene in bullying at colleges? Is it President Obama’s responsibility if a child is bullied on a public playground?  Is the governor of your state responsible for the crimes committed in the state?  Imagine the chaos that would ensue?  We’d have no governors, no presidents, no CEO’s, no senators…at all.

According to Van Brunt, after bystanders, ie, students, the second leader to take effective action is a school counsellor through the ladder to the Director of Counselling and Dean of Students, when and if it is necessary. Third would be faculty intervention.

According to Federal laws, there are specific applications of law that address harassment and bullying defining it as being “severe, pervasive or persistent”, and “creating a hostile environment that is sufficiently serious so that it interferes or limits a student’s ability to participate in or benefit from activities, services or opportunities at school”.   Was that the case at Mizzou?  No.  However, it became the case at Mizzou when the student and faculty body made life miserable for the President and Chancellor.

A university operates under the guidance of a very specific hierarchy, beginning with the Board. The Board determines what the President may and may not do. This President was specifically hired in 2012 to cut costs, that was his focus. The Board also includes a student advocate whose responsibility it is to communicate to the Board grievances and issues within the student body. In fact, Missouri University does have a grievance policy that addresses discrimination and harassment issues, including who to report to and a time limit for the agency to respond.

But, according to various media outlets, procedure was not followed. In fact, Facebook was the form of grievance employed.  The students and faculty at Mizzou are now faced without a leader, without a Chancellor or President.  They have been taught that this is the way to get your way.  They have been taught that bullying works.  Whoa be to the future of ethics.

The lesson learned? The Mule and The Well: Face our problems and respond to them positively so that the outcome reflects what you would have others do to you. When we demand punishment of those that are truly our protectors, we risk becoming the future victim of our own hostility.

Obama’s Alliance Foundation – A Blunder of Racism

A new, old organization is being tauted by Obama and his contingent of keepers; Bloomberg and Soros. It’s called the new and improved My Brother’s Keeper Alliance. Because the old one didn’t take. Backed by $80 million – to start – it can’t lose… or can it?

What happened to the Foundation he started in 2014?

Obama is focused on the; ‘tragic history in the US which makes it tougher for some to succeed…” History? I am a woman. We were property in history. White men were persecuted in the UK for their faith and banished. White men were ostracized for their debt and imprisoned, only to be shipped to Australia. History? I’m sorry, but history is over. The reason certain minorities succeed and other’s fail has been proven over and over again – family.

His new and improved foundation uses the acronym – MBK. But when I looked it up, MBK already exists and has since 1999. It too is a nonprofit 501(c)(3). It’s logo and site are copyrighted. It’s purpose is to help minorities who have health issues they need to overcome. Initially, HIV was the focus.

There would appear to be a copyright infringement here…

Obama’s site was uploaded in 2015. It’s aim focus’s exclusively on men and boys – no women allowed club. It is exclusive to boys of color, so whites are specifically excluded. I went through the website and still could not find exactly what they do. They have ‘documents’ posted online that encourage businesses to hire ‘men of color’. And they ask for donations. I just don’t see what they do with the money except maybe write more PR documents.

I have a background in business and generally when one launches a new business there is a past, a track record, and a business plan of ‘action’. But this Alliance has none of this – no history, no proven track record, and no plan of action. They just want – money because the $80 million has vanished?

Playing with the statistics: In 2013, about 40 percent of whites between the ages of 25 and 29 had a bachelor’s degree or more, compared to about 20 percent of blacks, 15 percent of Hispanics and 58 percent of Asians, according to data from the Current Population Survey. Blacks make up 12% of the US population. Given these stats, 20% of the 12% should be represented in businesses – 2.4%.

So let’s take a look at the NFL: Of the 175 cornerbacks in the league, 170 are black. At running back, 107 of the 120 players are African-American. White players account for 27.7 percent of the NFL rosters.

In the NBA, 35.7% of all professional employees are people of color. But wait – only 12% of the US population is black, therefore whites are unjustly discriminated against in this venue. And 47% of head coaches are people of color. In the category of players, the discrimination gets even greater – 76% of all NBA players are African-American.

Does this mean we must require the NBA and NFL to alter their drafts so as to be less discriminatory?

No. Forcing coaches to hire more whites from a pool of applicants knowing that it could cost them the championship, is absurd. Forcing businesses to hire blacks from a pool of applicants when the qualifications are non-existent, is absurd. Every time we make ‘race’ the problem, we are creating the problem. It is not about race, it is about poverty and education. It is about family and values.

You can’t lift people out of poverty without education. You can’t lift people out of anger and crime when the value system of the family does not exist.

Statistics also don’t measure a person’s heart. For example, my ex-husband’s sister was a verifiable brainiac. She got a very prestigious degree from Stanford. She ‘chose’ to use that degree to teach high school. Income, for her, was not a measure of success. For her, teaching was the success.

Look no further for an example of minority success than to Asians in the US. They have a divorce rate of about 8-10% compared to African-Americans who have a significantly higher divorce rate as well as a significantly higher rate of children born out of wedlock. (And before you go there – no, the solution is not more condoms.) Asians have a lower unemployment rate – even compared to whites. They have the highest rate of income and education of any racial group in the US. Their value structure is about family, provision, and education. It works.

The solution is education. Education in school, but also education about values, morality, marriage, parenting and ethics. It is not about forcing businesses to hire a person based on race. It is about bringing everyone to the line of ability.

So what is the focus of this new and improved Foundation? Division. Race. Gender. Hardly a promotion of anything of value.