Migrant Caravan Funding? Catholic Church, Red Cross, Hope Border Institute, University of Texas…

Civil Rights lawyer Mario B Williams out of Georgia is one of the four lawyers who have filed a class action against the Trump administration on behalf of a group of the Caravan attendees claiming, “President Trump continues to abuse the law, including constitutional rights, to deter Central Americans from exercising their lawful right to seek asylum in the United States.”  The lawsuit apparently also refers to Trump as ‘our president’. An oddity since they aren’t citizens…

Mario Williams has been billed as the legal advocate of last resort when your case is so flimsy no one else will take it.  April of 2018, he was headlined in The Seattle Medium for his intent to initiate a $20 million “legal campaign to investigate and uncover the ties of political and business leaders to White supremacist groups. He wants to dig up their secret rivers of money and shame them into cutting off the extremists.”

The money for the campaign is coming from a company called, Libre By Nexus.  Launched by 2 ex-cons in 2013, Michael Donovan and Richard Moore, the firm guarantees bail for immigrants to win their release from detention.

Libre is a for-profit company that has annual revenues topping $30 million and over 6500 clients.  Their fees include a $14 per day ankle bracelet that clients must wear until their court date which is typically 3-4 years in the future.  That tallies to $33,215,000.   The daily cost to Libre for the bracelet is $3.   They are currently the subject of a lawsuit claiming the bracelets frequently don’t even work, and their niche is ‘predatory’.

With upwards of 14,000 scheduled to arrive sometime around November 25th, detainees will likely be referred to Libre via Mario Williams. Libre could thus easily double their current revenues if they added just another 6500 to their coffers of ankle bracelets.

Follow The Money.

The name of Mario Williams firm is, ‘Nexus Derechos Humanos’.  It lists as its parent and funding company – Nexus Services Inc., the same parent company of Libre By Nexus.   The lawsuit filed against the Trump administration is funded by Nexus Services, Inc whose founders are Michael Donovan and Richard Moore.  They do not want their pool of caravans to be squelched and thus deprive them of an ongoing revenue stream.

Located in Verona, Virginia, they operate a number of subsidiary companies within their particular brand including a charity called Nexus Caridades.  Their business plan continues to expand and they have moved into real estate offering rental housing for immigrants – at a price.

While CEO Donovan continually claims that they are not in this for the money, they are doing this simply from their hearts… the fact remains it is a highly profitable venture – they never attempted to sustain a charitable organization.  They are capitalistic capitalizing on a deficiency caused by caravans of illegal immigrants demanding free reign in the US.

And so, the question keeps returning, who is behind the funding of these caravans?

Certainly, Flores of Pueblo Sin Frontera is named continuously, but an even grander ulterior motive is levied by Hope Border Institute.  Comprised of various Monsignors and Deacons of the Catholic church, University of Texas, New Mexico State University, and others, their website claims that many Catholic migrant shelters in Mexico are core in the creation of the caravans “within the framework of symbolic reenactments during Easter season of the Stations of the Cross (Via Crucis), or Christmas-time posadas (the novena commemorating the pilgrimage in search of shelter of Jesus’ migrant family).”

Catholic Deacons can not act without the approval and sanction of Pope Francis.

In addition they provide a list of those who are initiating ‘direct organization’ in each country:  “…in Honduras by COFAMIPRO (Comité de Familiares de Migrantes de El Progreso) and in El Salvador by COFAMIDE (Comité de Familiares de Migrantes Fallecidos y Desaparecidos del Salvador); another similar organization in Honduras is the Comité de Familiares de Migrantes Desaparecidos del Centro de Honduras (COFAMICENH).”

All of this is at the core of US aid which is channeled to Mexico for the so-called “Southern Border Plan” as part of the Mérida Initiative. Originally developed to thwart the trafficking of drugs and money laundering, the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations diverted funding to help drug treatment, instead of drug flow – thereby allowing the influx of drugs and trafficking while creating a burgeoning ‘treatment program’.  Another capitalist idea shadowed in a social program!  Follow The Money!

Hope Border Institute claims that US regime coups have been instrumental in causing the collapse of countries as corruption is cultivated and chaos then reigns. One such coup was promulgated in 2009 by the Obama administration on Honduras wherein a fraudulent election was aided by US government agencies to insert Porfirio Lobo Sosa of the National Party.  He has since been indicted for helping to protect drug organizations, corruption, redirecting funds, etc…

They go on to claim that these caravans are a “messianic moment reflected in the emergence of a powerful new transnational migrant rights movement, that is undermining long held orthodoxies regarding the imperatives of state sovereignty within the context of migration policy and human rights. All of this also lays the basis for fully incorporating migrants as collective subjects as to the mass human rights crimes  which have been committed against them with convergent responsibility on the part of the US and Mexico, within the framework of Mexico’s incipient transitional justice process, and of a convergent process on both sides of the border.”

In other words, the US and Mexico are fully responsible for the human rights violations of Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, and thus the US must now pay for these violations by chaos and violence if necessary and by accepting the flow unconditionally which now averages 450,000 annually.

Honduras’ COFAMIPRO, and El Salvador COFAMIDE are backed by The Red CrossThe International Committee of the Red Cross has embarked on what they term a “Movement” in the publication of the Red Cross Red Crescent Magazine. Their front page issue on the website highlights:  Beyond Borders; Building Trust and Protecting Migrants…”

So you wanted to know who is behind the caravans…

Want to know why Pope Francis keeps pushing for the US to be open arms and open borders?

They are likely – a major funding source…

Saudi’s Framed: Part II

The Middle East is its own power keg of rivalry, no different than various EU countries vying for power amid clashing political ideologies.   Saudi Arabia has imposed itself as the figurehead of the Middle East, much as Germany has pronounced itself as head honcho of the EU.  Saudi Arabia feels that unity is sacred, and when a child gets out of line, that child is sanctioned – Qatar.  Qatar is the rebel child.   The EU has its fair share of rebel children, but when children of these countries get out of line, it is not the business of the US to intervene.  So why would we intervene in the Middle East power struggle?

Placing the US in the position of reigning judgment on the politics of countries in the Middle East is a lose-lose scenario.

And thus, in the vein of ‘Follow The Money’, we are monetarily entrenched to Saudi Arabia – their trade and economic contributions to the US cannot be unraveled.   They have been decades in the making – Trump didn’t create them, but reality is – that’s the way it is now.   As Trump so politely emphasized, one Wapo reporter is not worth scrubbing a $110 billion Saudi deal.

On the table – $110 billion. Why are Democrats and a handful of McCainish Republicans willing to scrub that economic benefit to the US?  What does the Saudi arms deal mean and who does it benefit?

First:   A deal worth $110 billion is nothing to sneeze at – and if it is garnered by Trump, then the Liberals will do anything to uproot it in order to delegitimize Trump.   So a “Con” was created.  If Trump favors the Saudis, he’ll become media fodder in the UN Human Rights squash court –  If he dumps the Saudis, the US economy will tank.

But the con was sloppy. After all the anonymous evidence was found to be laughably faked, the only evidence left is a fuzzy video of Khashoggi entering the embassy – and gasp – no video of him exiting.   That doesn’t mean he didn’t exit – it simply means there is no video of it.

And as of right now that is the sum total of ‘evidence’ being used to convict the Saudis.

Second:   It sounds a lot like the Skripal poisoning evidence – Theresa May’s MI6 released video footage of two Russians walking down the street, the same week of the poisonings! GUILTY.

The Saudi con conveniently aligns with election time.  As did the Trump Dossier.  No coincidence there…   But given the sloppiness of the Saudi con, I would hope it wasn’t based out of MI6.

At any rate, the source at this point seems to be coming from Qatar and Al Jazeera.   The Qatar/Saudi row is waging large and in charge.   And a derailment with Saudis would mean a shift to ‘other countries’ in order to supply what is lost in Saudi trade.  Which can not happen because of the equities, treasuries and real estate holdings – way too complicated.

The amount of spending Qatar has with the US is a fragment of what Saudi Arabia contributes.   But the infighting is rooted in 1)  the Muslim Brotherhood – for which Qatar is entrenched, and  2) Iran – for which Qatar is aligned.  3) Khashoggi is head of the Muslim Brotherhood.

And therein is the core of the silly attempt to make a reporter possibly stage his own disappearance so as to ignite a war reminiscent of WWI wherein

“On 28 June 1914, Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian  Serb Yugoslav nationalist, assassinated the Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, leading to a diplomatic crisis.    On 23 July, Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia; interlocking alliances quickly drew in all the major European powers with their respective colonial empires and the conflict rapidly spread across the globe.”

Unfortunately, not unlike most edited fragments of history, even the insinuation of Princip as the assassin is subject to scrutiny.   Was he any more guilty than modern scape-goats and framed assassins?  I don’t know, another blog.

Ultimately, WWI was ignited by the death of one man and resulted in the casualties of over 40 million thereafter.

Who benefitted then is who would benefit now?

The war mongers:  The Banks.  The Cabal.  Pharmaceutical and military Corporations.   The drivers are estimated to count around 100,000.

Who loses?   Everyone else.

Why did this one death frame an entire World War?

World Wars I and II have been said to be rife with scandal and corruption, wars that could have easily been avoided, except for the Cabal’s influence.  The Federal Reserve and WWI were completely aligned.   The idea for WWIII has been levied for a number of years, and would certainly be fuel to a Liberal agenda for control, population eradication, and profit – the never-ending greed profile as defined in “Follow The Money”.

Back to the Saudis:   One thing that has become a mainstay of the liberal agenda is the fact that they draw their plots from history – as though they can’t create anything new or intelligent.   The rape agenda.   The false dossier agenda.   The hack.  Always the same, always leaving a trail of grease and smut.

So who would benefit from a derailment of the Saudi military agreements – Iran and  Qatar.  And all those who have aligned their investment interests $$$$$ in Iran based on the Iran Deal that was upended by Trump.  This would include Germany which is desperate to legitimize their trade and needs the bump in their economy.

While we are left with the redundant question – who would benefit from a disruption in Saudi-US relations – it is interesting to watch Rubio demand the new judicial decree ‘guilty until proven innocent’.  Where have we heard that before?  A sloppy con and a scream of guilty…Rubio just outed himself quite finely.

Wikipedia: A Facebook/Google Protege

Sometime ago I got hooked on the phrase “Follow The Money”.  It has proven to be even more than I could possibly imagine.  And today was proof again.

I was reading that Breitbart has been delisted from Wikipedia as a source, and they are further considering blacklisting.  And while Wikipedia has a history of controversies, including the fact that most schools prohibit Wikipedia from being used as a citation, they seem to have jumped onto the Facebook – Google Bandwagon, and their Liberal bias is just as perverse, if not more so!

Wikipedia is actually owned by Wikimedia Foundation which is governed by a Board and has as it’s current Executive Director, Katherine Maher.  Her bio states that she worked for the National Democratic Institute, an NGO whose Chair is Madeleine Albright, a Trilateral confederate, and whose source of funding includes the US Department of State, as well as the governments of Australia, Denmark and Belgium.   The Board Chair of the Foundation, Christophe Henner, has no Wikimedia profile at all – a rather bizarre oddity.

In case that doesn’t hit a home run, that means, a US NGO that is pro- Clinton, Soros, and everything Liberal is funded by ALL US taxpayers as well as governments from very Liberal/Socialist countries…  The irony being that Republicans are funding Liberal NGO’s!  I’m sure they find this very humorous…

Ahhh, but it gets better.

In 2015, Wikipedia attempted to launch “Knowledge Engine” which aimed to created a loop of sorts that would take internet searches back to them no matter the content or the Google search wording.  The funding for this cryptic engine was the Knight Foundation.  In line with numerous media outlets; NBC, ABC, NYT, and WAPO, The James L. Knight Foundation also backs the Investigative News Network, INN, which is funded by Soros Open Society Foundation, and is possibly the most-well-known journalism foundation. Knight President and CEO, Alberto Ibargüen, is on the board of directors for ProPublica.

Pro-Publica is affiliated with The New York Times and gets it’s funding from; Open Society Foundation, Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Ford Foundation Pew Charitable Trusts, The Carnegie Corporation and the Atlantic Philanthropies.  We can assume – that all these foundations are interlinked within the Democrat Foundation, ie, The Swamp.

How deep does it go?

The founders of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, made their debut launching an ‘adult content’ erotica portal that Wales likened to Maxim magazine. Many of the Trustees and Board author content for Wikipedia under pseudonyms, many of which have German tenure and nearly all, if not all, would appear to be – Liberals.

What this reveals is a very intense demonstrative action to – rewrite history.  To eradicate all but one thought process.  And to dummy down, not just the US, but the world when it comes to people, events, and even – opinion.  Wikipedia has a huge presence in Germany, Australia, UK, Canada, India, etc… They crafted themselves as the purveyor of knowledge, the definer of history, and the opinion of mankind.

And now, they have chosen to defame sources that they deem do not align with their World Agenda.

The extent to which we have been manipulated only seems to grow exponentially with the unveilings.  We are all sources.  We were all duped.  We have all been manipulated at some point.  And yet, these people, these web communities, would seem to have absolutely no self examination or guilt.   Instead they would seem to take pride in the extent to which they can fool and demonize.  These people that Jimmy Wales surrounded himself with came from Google, JP Morgan, Semantic, Quora, the UN, etc…, with a very large presence coming from – Merkel’s, Germany.

The same Merkel who censors media and promotes the criminal offense of saying anything anti-Islam.

The bio’s of these affiliates of Wikimedia are typically referred to as so-and-so of the Wikimedia Movement.  “Our aim was to identify a common strategic direction that would unite and inspire people across our movement on our way to 2030, and help us make decisions.”

Each month on average, Wikipedia is viewed more than 15 billion times, and accessed by more than 1 billion unique devices.  More than 200,000 editors are volunteers.  German researchers rank Wikipedia high as a reliable source…  And this one is quite grand!  Researchers at Harvard, the same Harvard that has produced MOST of The Swamp, concluded that Wikipedia’s editors are critical reliable resources for verifiable topics and concerns…

Surprise!

Of course, this glowing tribute was written by a California lawyer within the law firm associated with the Milken Institute.  If you remember!  Michael Milken was convicted on felony charges for violating SEC laws, racketeering and his charitable giving.

Not exactly a stellar resume for lauding Wikipedia!  FOLLOW the Money, but also follow the Lineage.

At any rate – we can see from the Money Flow – where Wikipedia stands and why it is in line with the Liberal persuasion of Google and Facebook, why it utilizes it’s influence to create a burgeoning false agenda and how it specifically targets that design.

Buyer – Beware.

Child Detention Centers Generated $5.2 Billion Annually?

October 2012, a scathing article was written exposing the Obama Practice of putting illegal alien children crossing the border alone in prison like detention centers, and given the lack of space, sometimes they had to be housed at military facilities.   Between October 2011 and June 2012, border agents apprehended 15590 children and put them in detention centers.   There were no parents in these shelters. 

In 2014, a USA Today article again unleashed a scathing report as it exposed 90,000 unaccompanied children were now living in US detention centers, while 1100 of them were being housed at a Texas Air Force base due to lacking space.

It was revealed that according to Homeland Security:

“Several temporary and permanent resettlement centers on the border have opened just to house unaccompanied migrant children. But the HHS’ Administration for Children & Families, which has responsibility for the children, won’t say where the centers are or how much is being spent for the kids’ care.”

Federal law states that the unaccompanied children are supposed to be turned over to HHS within 72 hours and then reunited with parents or other relatives already living in the United States.

But they weren’t – otherwise there would be no need for so many Detention Facilities.  Follow The Money.   The Walmart in Brownsville Texas that garnered all kinds of conspiracy theories that it was going to be a prison for US citizens when Obama declared Marshall Law – was actually transformed into a ‘children’s detention facility’ and shuttered from the press or public – by Obama.

The conditions of some facilities were so awful a complaint was filed by the American Civil Liberties Organization citing children not even given water, molestation, and beatings.   At the time federal funding cuts were being made against organizations that were tasked with addressing this problem. Appropriations were scarce, and according to the article:  “The problem with the administration is they don’t want to give information,” he said. “In fact, there’s times when they don’t want to give information to members of Congress. It’s almost like they don’t want the American public to know about the situation.”

The issue was obviously quite alive and thriving throughout the entire tenure of the Obama Administration who wanted to cover it up, and pretend it didn’t exist.

In fact, the exact same photos were being splashed across the media exposing ‘cages’ and over-crowded facilities – in 2014.

But it even gets better for those with short term memory loss.  In 2016, Obama was attempting to force the state of Texas to grant the largest child detention facility a new classification “Child Care Facility”, despite the fact that it was originally built as a prison for men.   It boasts a gym, Zumba classes, a beauty salon, playgrounds and a school, not exactly short-term – as in 72 hour holding.   While opponents wanted the facilities shut down and the children released, Obama argued that it would not be in their best interest and granting child care status would open the facilities up to receiving considerably more government funding.

A former employee at one of the Texas centers stated that, “security locked up migrant mothers who spoke out about the conditions. She said a psychologist worked as an informant for federal agents, and that her bosses regularly asked her to omit complaints to hide them from government audits. In early 2015 and again in December 2015, migrants at the center went on hunger strikes.”

Obama argued that sending the children to live with their relatives while giving them an ‘ankle bracelet’ to monitor them would only cost $17 a day compared to the $159 per day it cost to house a child in a detention center – or roughly $4800 per month per child – $58,000 per year!  And Obama wanted to expand the cost… why?  Most likely because he is a share holder through a series of offshore trust accounts.

So the disservice that Time Magazine, The Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, Mika Brzezinski and all the despicable faces in Hollywood  have conveniently forgotten – is the POLICY was not only created by the Obama Administration, but they fought tooth and nail to make it into a mega-business venture utilizing taxpayer funding! At $58,000 a head times 90,000 children – that translates to a $5.22 billion annual revenue…