Guns; Mass Shootings; And Mental Health

Mass shooting.   The first recorded as such in the US was in 1949 when in Camden, New Jersey a 29 year old Howard Unruh walked calmly through his neighborhood and shot and killed 13, wounding another 3. He was diagnosed as criminally insane. He used a German Luger that he obtained as a WWII veteran.  

In 1968 Charles Whitman, a Marine trained sharpshooter struggling with violent tendencies shot his mother, and his wife among 12 others, and injured an additional 31 people using an arsenal of weapons including semi-automatics, a Luger, and a Magnum. He was diagnosed with a brain tumor.

In 1982 George Banks shot and killed 13 people including 5 of his own children and their mothers. His lawyer plead insanity stating that he was a victim of racism because of his own mixed racial identity.

In 1984, James Huberty announced to his wife that he thought he might have mental problems. He had a history of domestic violence. Three days later he shot 41 people in McDonalds, 22 died.

Since those shootings nearly 300 people have died in 19 separate events as a result of deadly mass gun violence perpetrated by a lone gunman who had mental illness or by terrorists.  The weapons ranged from semi-automatic rifles, to handguns, to the use of multiple guns as in an ‘arsenal’.

THIRTEEN Presidents have served in office during this time frame.   Eleven of these 22 shootings, 50%, occurred during Obama’s reign.   253 people died during Obama’s reign as a result of mass shootings and he did nothing to change or quell these atrocities.   But somehow this is the fault of Trump and the NRA…

While there remain the naysayers who believe that mental health is not a causal factor, the statistics simply do not support this defense.   In fact, the statistics overwhelmingly do provide this fact or Truism as a core commonality.   However, while creating a mental health database for the purchase of guns may hinder or slow the ability to purchase, black markets will always abound, and as Sweden has newly discovered, perpetrators will simply find a new weapon of choice – hand grenades and bombs, which are apparently quite plentiful.

Mental health in the US is an abysmal statistic. It is believed that 20% of the US population has some degree of mental health issue with 50% suffering co-occurring substance abuse. 11.2% of youth suffer from severe depression.   And the over-whelming majority “Choose” to not seek help.   Not because it isn’t available, but because they don’t want to.

Perhaps a better query would be to ask why the US is host to so many with mental health issues?

In 2004, “the most common primary diagnostic groups were depression (27.8%), schizophrenia (19.5%), bipolar disorder (19.4%), alcohol use disorder (11.6%), and drug use disorder (11.1%), with other psychiatric disorders accounting for the remain- ing 10.5% of hospitalizations.”    Prior to the infamous Obamacare, 53% of the total medical cost was assumed by Medicare and Medicaid, the remainder was covered by public health insurance – according to Premier Perspective Community Database. This would mean that Obamacare has had no relative benefit in reducing uninsured from seeking psychiatric help.

In the 1950’s and 1960’s, anxiety was the most common disorder. Miltown was the first mass produced drug distributed to inhibit anxiety and was prescribed as a tranquilizer writing a phenomenal 500 million prescriptions.   With the advent of Valium, 20% of all women and 8% of all men reported taking this new and improved tranquilizer in the 1970’s and the term anxiety was replaced with ‘depression’.

Between 1987 and 1997, the psychiatric community increased their diagnosis of depression by 300%.   A boon to the pharmaceutical industry!

Today, most treatment for mental health disorders is- a prescription.   A person may request treatment without the use of drugs, but this is quite uncommon and most psychiatrists are rather pushy in demanding drug administration.  The causes are left unfettered, and the symptoms are masked by drugs.

In 2015, there were 130 people killed in mass shootings in France by semi-automatic weapons despite a nearly complete ban on such guns.   In 2016, Ali Sonboly killed 21 people in Munich at a McDonalds. He was under psychiatric care for depression. He was said to have been severely bullied at school.  Germany has very strict gun laws.

And while there is a meme circulating that demands more psychiatrists in schools, more teachers, more counselors, more nurses, more tolerance, more more, it is so incredibly unrealistic and serves no real purpose in providing a true solution.   The core commonality of most mass shootings is mental health (outside of terrorism) whether in the US or abroad.   Among youth, school bullying is by far the most prevalent cause.  Medicating society has been the solution according to Big Pharma.  While Pharma has prospered on this notion quite lucratively, society has suffered.

The last gun law passed by the Federal government expired in 2004.   Since then, two sitting Presidents have done absolutely nothing.   Trump has stated that he will be researching ways to better monitor background checks for mental illness, but it is a difficult path with many barriers, the most obvious of which is – privacy and HIPPA. Civil Rights lawsuits would hugely impact the ability of background checks to include medical records.   And while Israel has been cited as a model, a behavioral assessment is required in order for a person to own a gun.

Still the media cites guns and Trump as the culprit while Obama gets a pass, HIPPA is ignored, and the estimate that only 15% of firearms used in an illegal act were legally obtained, is not addressed.   

In view of the ‘death threats’ promulgated by multiple Hollywood entertainers, their mental health would most certainly qualify them for prohibition… community service, and fines.  Right?

Mueller’s Pathetic Indictment

Hundreds of thousands of dollars later, thousands of wasted hours later, thousands of derisive media articles later, the Big Indictment is basically for “Trolling”. There are literally thousands upon thousands of trolling operations around the world, sourced in every country with little to no exception.   And, by itself, trolling is not even illegal in the US unless it involves harassment, bullying or stalking.

Worse – these same Trolls named by Mueller were outed by Buzzfeed four years ago!

After all the obsession, after all the derision, after all the vilifying, the best our esteemed CIA Director with visions of a beheaded Trump could do, was rehash what was already hashed four years ago… The absurdity is beyond comprehension given they had to know exactly what they found from the beginning and spent all this time creating innuendo without a lick of evidence.

Trolls have been a source of angst for over two decades dating to the 1990’s when they were referred to as Usenet “flame wars”.   Sometimes they are well organized, and sometimes they are kids.

What did this mean, nasty company do that was so heinous? They posted comments and ads that supported their belief and/or opinion. I guess that would mean that The New York Times and Washington Post are really just “Trolls”.   The group Anonymous is considered a troll given their anonymity. The largest in the US is 4chan which was developed in 2003 by Christopher Chan who was 15 at the time.   The Daily Stormer is another large US based site trolling in favor of neo-Nazi ideals.

Hackers, trollers, faceless commentators, they are the internet frenzy, and most people can easily recognize them and move on.   But if presenting an ad or an opinion that is in contrast to someone else’s is considered ‘trolling’ then free speech is eliminated, it is dead. A fine line needs to be developed that defines what is legal and what is not.

Mueller’s indictment charges that the Russian Trolls intended to incite discord and undermine public confidence in democracy.   If inciting discord is illegal then I would imagine just about very media outlet, including The View, would qualify for an indictment.   The ‘operation’ utilized social media… well Hollywood has systematically called for the beheading and death of Trump and Pence… Why haven’t they been indicted?

And then there is humor: The most notable bad guy in the organization is Yevgeny V. Prigozhin, a wealthy Russian who used to run a fast-food stand! GASP!   How dare he!   Some of their more corrupt slogans included: Vote Republican, Vote Trump, and Support The Second Amendment!   OH MY GOSH!

They organized protests… spent thousands of dollars over a few months… and criticized Hillary Clinton…   Imagine the audacity!

Election Manipulation, or vote rigging, is “illegal interference with the process of an election, whether by increasing the vote share of the favored candidate, depressing the vote share of the rival candidates, or both.”  Mueller’s report contends that this DID NOT occur.   Therefore, nothing illegal occurred.  It was an entire wasted debacle of disingenuous, vilifying, stupidity for the sake of an agenda put forth by George Soros because his candidate lost and he’s a sore loser.

Mueller has mud on his face. His 37 page Indictment comes with no arrests. The only illegal charge that appears to have been mustered in the Indictment is the charge that some of the trolls utilized fake driver’s licenses and stolen identities. One man has admitted to this charge, Richard Pinedo, an American from California, who claims his assistance in re-establishing identities was innocent, but he is guilty of doing it.

Somehow the mainstream media seem to think that this Mueller indictment is a spectacular success.   But in reality the only success is the arrest of one American.   Because the Truth is – nothing in the indictment really shows manipulation any more than every media outlet, every blogger, every person doesn’t have the right to do – have an opinion and express it.

Trump is exonerated. Sanders is implicated. And Hillary’s $1.2 billion campaign is somehow muted by the $100,000 spending spree of the Internet Research Agency, LLC in posting ads on social media.

And oddly, it seems to have slipped the media or Mueller attention that in order for this company to be an LLC, it has to be a US registered company approved by the IRS and paying taxes…

Media Censorship

While Rome burned… Germany has just officially launched a 29 member fake news panel that will oversee all media, but most specifically Facebook, SKY, Twitter, Google and RTL.   Why those sources in particular? Because they proliferate in the schematic of Blogs, a media outlet that is currently, unregulated and uncensored.

Today, most media outlets are censored by the government, censored by the military, censored by a cabal whose goal has been for decades to control what the public hears and knows in order to educate them according to their interpretation of Truth. And in many cases, to educate them through the elimination of Truth.

Within this targeting of offensive and fake news, even more unnerving is how the ‘offending posts’ will be determined. Anyone can take a picture of whatever post they feel is bigoted, offensive, fake or otherwise and submit a complaint. The complaint is then referred to a self regulating panel within the social media front and if it is not removed, it is referred to this very independent 29 member panel within the German government for review. If the panel finds the comment or blog or article offensive or fake, they will then inform the media outlet and demand retraction within 24 hours. If the company does not retract the offensive post it can be fined upwards of $60 million. (The 24 period may be lengthened in very specific legal circumstances).

Just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I imagine that would also apply to fake or slanderous speech. Hence, the line of censorship is quite comparable to the propaganda of Nazi Germany.

In 1933 Nazi organizations made up lists of books they felt should not be read by Germans, ultimately they raided libraries and book stores whereby they confiscated and torched books deemed unacceptable.   Textbooks were rewritten to portray a singular view of Nazism and the world.  All newspapers, media, theatre, art, music, and radio came under the auspices of Joseph Goebbels and his Storm Troopers.  

Signed into law October 2017, it was not effective until January 1, 2018 and despite heavy criticism, is now in force. Labeled NetzDG, the law is hugely vague as to what constitutes a violation.

Stories that would have been blocked and considered fake by the panel would have included;   “Who invented the story of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2003 to reduce a whole region to rubble? Who propagated and supported the Maidan movement in Ukraine in 2014 as a supposed “revolution” in order to strengthen right-wing extremism and nationalist forces and foment conflict with Russia? Who used the lie about mass rape in Cologne on New Year’s Eve 2015/2016 to ignite a wave of anti-refugee sentiment? And who spread images of alleged “left-wing extremist” violence at the G20 summit in Hamburg to criminalize left-wing opponents and ban left-wing websites such as linksunten.indymedia.org?” 

This model of censorship is also being utilized by the EU Commission which has published guidelines to “proactively identify and remove illegal content. The press release states that the EU Commission will “closely monitor and evaluate the progress of online platforms in the coming months,” in order to decide whether “legislative measures to complement the existing legal framework” may be necessary.” 

As such the EU has surpassed its Socialism and officially entered into the first phase realm of a communist state. With Germany once again at the helm.

In 2016, during the Presidential campaign, recording artist Moby was contacted by the CIA and told to publish “rumors about Trump’s supposed collusion with the Russians”. A rumor.   Would the CIA be subject to NetzDG? If Moby’s account had been targeted would the CIA defend him and allow the rumors to proliferate? When Hollywood takes out their dirge of commentary in which they threaten Trump’s life, would those comments be eradicated? Of would they remain via defense implemented by the Soros cabal?

Who decides? Who is this independent panel?

Facebook implemented their panel of 500 employees in Essen Germany whose sole function is to eliminate content they feel violates NetzDG.   Self regulation was the first order as demanded by the German Socialist government.  Of course, this form of censorship has already been highly tagged in the Facebook scandal wherein young ‘curators’ used their personal political agenda to scrub conservative sites from the trending topics searches.

Twitter has come under fire for their “curators’ who recently targeted the feed of AfD deputy group leader, Von Storch, who responded to an Arabic-language Twitter post by Cologne police on New Year’s Eve by writing: “What the hell is happening in this country? Why is an official police site tweeting in Arabic? Do you think it is to appease the barbaric, gang-raping hordes of Muslim men?”

The post was deleted and her Twitter account suspended as it was deemed ‘hate speech’.

What Germany has created is a “legal means” for Social Media to censor the expressions of people whose political views do not align with their own. Unfortunately, the political views of Twitter and Facebook CEO’s are hugely Liberal and thus their regulation has allowed them to feed a biased, false, faked agenda of what is Truth.

“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”  Vladimir Lenin

“Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.”  Joseph Stalin

Pocahontas vs. Trump

A number of Twitterers are all atweet about a 1993 video that is making the rounds in which Trump argues with the Indian Affairs Committee about their discriminatory practice of giving unlimited gambling licenses to anyone claiming Native American tribal heritage, and most being exempt from taxation. If one looks at the various articles dating from that time frame, the consensus of the media was in agreement that this was an unfair, discriminatory practice that was being corrupted for fraudulent purposes by people claiming Native American heritage that was ‘questionable’.

Many Native American tribes are common, but today there are 572 federally recognized tribes in the US and hundreds more applications pending. Only half of those tribes are associated with reservations, and some tribes boast membership of just a couple hundred. Prior to 1970 when the Indian Affairs Committee was formed, over 20 states had zero Indian population whereas today that population magically now ‘exists’ and is privy to millions of dollars of subsidies and government entitlements.

For example the Ho-Chunk tribe claims membership of about 7000 Native Americans. They operate ‘SIX” casino’s, and own about 4600 acres of land – ‘in trust”, nontaxable.  Not privileged?  Not discriminatory?

The first Native American casino was established in Florida in the 1970’s by the Seminole Tribe and was recognized in a Supreme Court lawsuit in 1979 that stated the state had no jurisdiction to regulate the activities on a reservation. Nor could the state tax the profits.

The law states that Indians do not pay taxes on any revenue generated from land held in ‘trust’. In addition, given that ‘tribes’ act as separate and distinct governments, tax revenue is given to them, not the state or federal government. Therefore, when the gambling licenses became fodder, the enormous creed of corruption rose as well. As long as the ‘tribe’ is the licensee, the profits are not taxed.

Enter – mafia, cons, and frauds to manage ‘said property’.

Trump recognized this duplicity and took it to court. The number of ‘recognized Native America Tribes’ suddenly rose from a handful to nearly 600. Coincidence? Hardly.

It was this hypocrisy, this discrimination that Trump fought in the 1993 video that the left is going crazy about given his Pocahontas comment regarding the fake Native American – Elizabeth Warren. She, not Trump, corrupted and connived. She, not Trump manipulated and defrauded. And yet, the commentary would be about the ‘derogatory terminology’. Not the misappropriation of funds via false and misleading statements… aka, Elizabeth Warren.

In 2009, the revenue from Indian reservation gambling was estimated to be over $26.5 billion annually – not taxed. The actual number cannot be determined since it is non-reportable, but it is said to represent upwards of 43% of ALL gaming revenue in the US today!  I’d say that deserved a Congressional hearing!    Rather significant. But discussion – is not – politically correct, because the Native Americans are all, to this day, devout victims and we are all, to this day, perpetrators of the most vile. What seems to elude the perpetrator victimhood is that this would mean that every EU citizen is also responsible since our ancestry is predominantly from the EU. Oddly, despite this fact, Europeans instead chastise Americans as though this ancestry does not exist… they exclude themselves, although they are us according to genealogy and thus are the core perpetrators.

IN 1993, the year that Trump’s video was made, the New York Times was vocal about the heinous evolution of the gambling initiatives that were so discriminatory and hypocritical, stating in fact that Indian tribes that have taken advantage of the law have found it to be highly profitable.”

The NY Times goes on to delve into the discrepancy in attempting to determine if in fact a person or persons, or ‘tribe’ is in fact legitimate stating that records of identity are difficult if not incomplete, if not impossible to verify.

Which might explain why and how Warren was able to con her heritage, which was subsequently proven to be faked.

Why is it so important?

Because, the Federal government and the state governments have adopted rather largess subsidies and monetary awards for those who thus identify. And of course, no one would dare take advantage of those ‘awards’, ever…

FYI: Years ago while on a trek in Sante Fe with a girlfriend we bar hopped with a ‘Native American’ who confided that despite the fact that both his parents were well endowed physicians, making six figures each, because he was of the Native American percentage he was given; free college for eternity, free room and board, free monthly stipend, and more. When he decided one semester to take his ‘stipends’ and travel throughout Europe at our expense, once discovered, his wrists were slapped and he was told, “no, no, no, don’t do that again…” and put back into college for his 8-10th year.

IS THIS A PROBLEM? Yes. Is it a politically correct topic? Apparently NO.

What the 1993 video reveals is a failed government agenda that attempted to right a heinous wrong perpetrated centuries ago for which we are supposed to pay into eternity.   What Trump attempted to expose – was The Swamp that had taken control of that legal glitch – aka, the mafia.  And somehow – today, the story told is altered in the hopes that the 1993 media will be squelched…

But what is even more absurd about the entire hoopla is the fact that Elizabeth Warren’s actual heritage is Reed and Herring, both of which are rooted in English and German genealogy, both of which were instrumental in the wars against the Native Americans … therefore, she should be made to pay for the errs of her ancestors. Not to mention faking an identity to steal funds that could have been used by real Native Americans…

FUSION GPS – A TROLL

Mueller and The House Intelligence Committee have been quite busily investigating the Trump dossier and the possible collusion of Putin and Trump in engineering the election through Russian interference. The interference is said to have come through multiple outlets including trolling operations conducted by the Russian Firm, Internet Research, Ltd.   The trolls are said to infiltrate through social media, including Facebook and Google, whereby fake accounts were established in order to discredit Hillary and sway the public opinion toward Trump.

Fusion GPS was hired by the DNC, the GOP and ultimately Hillary to create the Trump Dossier. The purpose? To discredit Trump through fake documents leaked to the press – ie, Trolling. The leak initially came from McCain – a true hero of Soros and Hillary.

In 2014, Glen Greenwald exposed the fact that GCHQ and ‘western governments’ were complicit in quite actively employing ‘Trolls’, the purpose of which was to discredit religion, beliefs, news, blogs, media, and establish fake victims, fake accounts, and fake news. One UK based group Greenwald identifies is Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group.

In addition to working with various agencies within GCHQ, such as M15, M16, other customers include The Bank of England and the Department for Schools, Children and Families.

The interesting ‘connection’ here is M16. Because Fusion GPS brokered the deal with Christopher Steele whose claim to fame is the fact that he was formerly with – M16. While both M15 and M16 are British intelligence, M15 is considered domestic, while M16 is international, they are both under the umbrella of GCHQ.

This could possibly indicate that Trolls manipulating the US election didn’t just originate in Russia, but also from GCHQ.  

Fusion GPS is also attempting to redact the names of journalists it purportedly paid in the course of their election manipulation document.   However, Steele claims he had a series of meetings with journalists from; The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, The New Yorker and Yahoo News. All these media outlets have one thing in common – a Liberal Democrat pro-Hillary affiliation.

When GCHQ was asked by Greenwald to comment, their response was:
“…all of GCHQ’s work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorized, necessary and proportionate, and that there is rigorous oversight, including from the Secretary of State, the Interception and Intelligence Services Commissioners, and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee.”

At the time, the Secretary of State would have been – Hillary Clinton.

Most of the testimony regarding the Russian influence in the election is coming from organizations that are linked back to Navalny, a highly publicized and backed activist in Russia who is stridently critical of Putin. Navalny has links to Soros, but shortly after those links were publicized, another Troll operation, Citizen Lab, debunked the connection claiming it was a Trolling/hacking scheme. And since then, a third organization, CyberBerkut, claims that CitizenLab was actually a Troll hired to debunk the Troll that connected Navalny to Soros!!  So we have a Troll connected to Soros, trolling, and another Troll debunking, only to have another Troll debunk the troll’s debunking.

And yet, our Intelligence Division along with Meuller is aghast at the possibility of Russian Trolls? HELP ME HERE!

Where is Leslie Neilson when you need him?   This sounds like a Hollywood Spoof!

What this circles back to is the notion that the Russian Trolls may actually have been hired by the DNC and Hillary to persuade the election, but it didn’t work because there may have been ‘other Russian Trolls’ working to counter the Hillary Russian Trolls. All the while, the US and UK under Obama and Cameron employed their Trolls to troll the trolls via Facebook and Google, the CEO’s of both of which are avowed Democrat party members.

It is also of note that the anti-Russian, Citizen Lab, is based in Toronto, Ronald Deibert is the creator, CEO, whose former accomplishments include research scholar for the Ford Foundation, which is quite entrenched in the Soros Open Society Foundation. In addition he is an advisor for Tor, an organization that is built on software enabling anonymous communication – aka – Trolls.

It gets Worse.

The bulk of the funding for Tor comes from the federal government through DARPA and the Office of Naval Research…

Worse.

One of the initial supporters of Tor include Human Rights Watch, a Soros organization funded by his Open Society. The other initiator and supporter includes the International Broadcasting Bureau which was formed during Clinton’s presidency… and the longest serving Director was appointed by Obama.

These are the TROLLS.

Project Veritas has released actual undercover video of the New York Times homepage Editor, Des Shoe, cockily admitting that the NYT tried to ‘influence the election with their articles and reporting’! An ADMISSION.   So where is the outrage?   Further, she goes on to laughingly decry, tauting anti-Trump articles has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with vamping more subscriptions with Enquirer style headliners. TRUTH? Not even a consideration.

The hypocrisy is blatant, and yet it isn’t just the Democrats, the Maxine Waters wagging gnarly fingers and screaming, it’s the GOP Swamp fearfully coveting their access to greed, fraud, manipulation and sex all within a fundamentally opaque guise that their secrets will not be revealed… unless…

Meuller! Meuller! WAKE UP. Class is in Sessions.

Roy Moore – Sex Allegations Crumbling?

The legal age for marriage in Alabama is 16. In order to be charged with sexual misconduct in Alabama in 1975, a person would have to engage in sexual intercourse.  

Leigh Corfman age 53, claims that in 1979 at the age of 14, she was inappropriately touched by Republican candidate for Senate, Roy Moore who is currently age 70 and was at the time 32.  

Corfman claims that she did not come forward before because she was strapped financially having declared bankruptcy sometime in 1990’s, and because she was not a saint.   She says at the time she was approached by Moore, her mother was in a custody hearing and Moore was an older guy hitting on her and she thought that was cool.

Despite the fact that she told her mother ten years later of the contact, her mother did not make a report either.

Failure to make a report of suspected child abuse carries a misdemeanor charge with a possible prison sentence and a $500 fine.

While the Washington Post claims that Moore sexually abused Corfman, according to The Law Library, sexually explicit conduct is defined as:   “Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

 There was no sexual intercourse, and no exhibition. Was the contact inappropriate if it did occur? Yes. Was it illegal if it did occur?  That is legally debatable.

Of course it was arguably a stacked deck ready to swing the pendulum to the far right as the slew of allegations have come forth in the Liberal Hollywood sector.   Tit-for-Tat.

McCain has come forward to make this his own personal self righteous mission as he demands Moore step down immediately, forthwith, etc…   But, McCain is certainly not without his own crumbling deck abandoning his crippled wife to marry for money in order to gain the political power edge he craved.  McCain’s own political career occurred only one year after marrying the wealthy daughter of Jim Hensley who made his millions in the beer industry.   Hensley was the subject of investigations for his relationship and business dealings with Kemper Marley, a bookmaker with ties to the Mafia who purportedly ordered the car bomb hit of journalist Don Bolles just before he planned to expose the collusion of politicians with the Mafia.  Did McCain have some assistance in his rather fast tracked political career?

Two other unnamed women, who were purportedly 16 and 18 at the time claim Moore tried to date the have also come forward.  But there was no impropriety, simply a kiss and a date.   The 16 year old actually did not date him at all because her mother forbade it.  The 18-19 did, and Moore was a perfect gentleman.   So why is this even news?

Now, it has come to light that one of the women making the accusation of ‘dating’ worked as a sign language interpreter for – Hillary, aka Clinton.

“And all the King’s horses, and all the King’s men came tumbling down, – again…”

All these allegations took place 38 years ago. And never did any of these women come forth to police, or anyone else until now when the Democrat hopeful, Doug Jones, appears to be at a solid loss in the polls and the dirt, she come a flyin’!!  In 1997, Jones was appointed to US District Attorney by Bill Clinton.   Between 1984 and 1997, Jones was employed in private practice – however, apparently there is no record of where in Birmingham.  Which seems a bit odd given it is his longest stint of employment…

According to Breitbart, Jones affiliated himself with the Brennan Center for Justice which is the recipient of numerous grants totaling over $& million – from the Soros Open Society Foundation.   Jones would also be aligned with Black Youth Vote, NAACP, Alliance for Justice (another Soros organization), and CAF, a radical organization that partnered with the Occupy Movement.

Not exactly the best resume material.

To find a down-and-out woman barely making ends meet and offer her a stipend to make a baseless unproveable claim that occurred 38 years ago – is a bit stretchy…  but it may be exactly what the Clinton/Soros Democrats have tried, finding nothing else.  Rather lame.

Of course McCain, a known Soros partner, has demanded that Moore step down immediately and concede despite the fact that these allegations have no proof of substantiation.

If we were to call out McCain on his own past transgressions, there were allegations that he was negligently instrumental in starting the fire on the USS Forrestal in 1967 that killed 134 sailors. McCain subsequently denied the allegations, but if we were to impose the same judicial sentencing, should he not have immediately stepped down from political life beneath ‘the allegation’ – as he is stating Roy Moore must do?

It seems the Democrats are definitely losing their grip if this is as good as it gets…

Paradise Paper Caper – Who’s Who

The Paradise Papers have unraveled a web of offshore dealings far more intricate, complex and massive than the Panama Paper Caper. Comprised of over 13 million documents, the magnitude would appear to leave no one immune, but oddly, the headlines continually show Trump at the forefront as though he is the leader of the pack, when in reality, to date, he is not personally implicated at all…

In addition, headlines would tout the “massive dollars offshore accounts contributed to the Trump election”  through private means, ie, $60 million, while truly failing to headline that the actual leaders within the disclosures include; Credit Suisse, Soros, Apple, Facebook, Nike, Siemens, Google, Trudeau’s closest friend and Liberal Party fundraiser, Maciel, a Catholic Priest, Madonna, Bono, Chuck Schumer, and a host of Democrat mega-conglomerates.

It is interesting that despite the fact that Soros is a major donor and supporter of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) credited with releasing the trove, Soros and The Open Society were quite prolific in their offshoring…and have declined comment on their role.

Obviously plastering Trump’s picture on the trove is media deflection to protect the true sullied faces of Zuckerberg, Soros, and Urs Rohner, Chairman of Credit Suisse. Lest we forget, in 2014 Credit Suisse pleaded guilty to tax evasion and fraud and paid a $2.6 billion fine.   And Soros companies are mainly non-profits, therefore the true offshore evasion would potentially indicate that charities are not the recipients of his funds at all, but perhaps the money is funneled through intricate webs back to it’s source – Soros.

One of the more fiendish finds was the fact that numerous US universities have been hiding hordes of cash in offshore accounts all the while demanding huge subsidies from the federal government, raking students with increased tuition and fees, and defrauding their true financial picture.

Bush’s brother is named, The Queen of England is named, as well as Warren Stephens a conservative presidential donor who is behind massive ‘anti-Trump’ campaigns.

Putting Trump on the face of this leak is an obvious fraud and a rather lame intent to defraud, deflect and hide.

Guilt By Association is a collective concept that declares that members of a group can be held responsible for the actions of one. If we were to apply this same theory to Soros, that would imply that Obama, Clinton, McCain and a host of others should be heralded with their pictures splashed across headlines – as the offshore perpetrators.

While the actual use of offshore accounts is not illegal, sometimes they are used to circumvent the law and to launder money. It’s a black market of sorts in which organized crime finds a legal means to invest illegally obtained funds. They are used to hide assets and to evade taxes. Insurance and reinsurance companies are notorious for utilizing these havens, not just for their companies, but their executives as well make use of the advantage to avoid taxes.

Trump’s new tax reform addresses this evasion by offering a one time reprieve at a significantly lower tax rate for reclaiming into the US monetary system the trillions that are floating.

It would see that the same individuals advocating against Trump’s tax reform are the exact same ones who utilize this offshore evasion loophole. Because bringing that money back into the system will have an enormous positive effect on the economy – which would not boost the Democrat agenda.

So how do they defeat the revelations? Manipulation. The media is claiming that over 120 US politicians are implicated in the release and yet they reveal mostly those who have some relationship with Trump or the GOP Party.

While the journalists pour over the trove of 13 million documents, what is actually released to the public will most likely lean toward the agenda of the journalist’s media conglomerate… and not the agenda of Truth.

At least, that is what they are doing now…

 

Hillary’s Uranium One Deal – 101

Heather Digby Parton, a blogger for Salon, has taken it upon herself to post a meme in which she ‘soundly’ exonerates Hillary Clinton’s role in the Uranium One Scandal.   She incorrectly states that the entire deal had nothing to do with governments because it was and is a ‘private company, ruled by private board members and that ‘other committee members within the US government’ could have intervened, but didn’t, including:   “the secretaries of the Treasury, homeland security, energy and defense; the White House budget director; the attorney general; and the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.”

By default, is Digby actually opening a Pandora’s Box in implicating accomplices?

Those other people would include; Timothy Geithner; worked under Bill Clinton, involved in numerous questionable decisions during the subprime mortgage crisis and a member of Bilderberg Group and Council on Foreign Relations. Janet Napolitano; whose resume is a plethora of critcisms and empty apologies after making incorrect statements, targeted statements, right wing attack statements, etc…   Peter Orszag; also a Bilderberger, also served under Billy, and Austan Goolsbee who was instrumental in Obama’s Senatorial run in 2004…

Hillary became Secretary of State in 2009. Uranium One’s deals were subject to anti-trust regulations and required approval and clearance by the US Committee on Foreign Investments. The State Department was a voting member of the Committee, the others included Geithner, Napolitano, Steven Chu, Robert Gates who had according to Times Magazine, “formed a formidable partnership with Hillary Clinton”, – and Eric Holder… need I say more.

This is the Committee that approved the Uranium One deal.

Back-tracking:  In 2005, Billy and Frank Giustra traveled to Kazakhstan after which Giustra’s company, UrAsia Energy, bought rich uranium interests there. In 2007, Uranium One acquired controlling interest in UrAsia Energy from Frank Giustra. Substantial contributions to the Clinton Foundation followed ultimately leading to the creation of the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative in which he contributed $100 million and pledged 50% of all future earnings from ‘mining’.

As of 2013, the Russian company ARMZ had complete control of Uranium One, and shortly thereafter, that interest was extinguished and transferred to Rosatom, which is Russia’s state owned uranium monopoly. At this point, Hillary had resigned to establish her run for Presidency, and John Kerry was the acting Secretary of State.

It was during this time that revenue from the Clinton Foundation and the Giustra Initiative would rocket in the moola in the realm of $340 million annually with a piddling 6% actual charitable payout. It was later revealed that the returns had been falsely prepared and were required to be restated. No charges were filed for these discrepancies.

It is estimated that Hillary’s failed presidential run cost between $1.2 and $1.7 billion, more than any Democrat in history.

In addition to mining, Giustra has quite a background making billions in a variety of industries including entertainment, via Thunderbird Films, Lionsgate Reunion Pictures and UK based Soda Pictures.

In addition, he established the Radcliffe Foundation which also contributed to the Clinton Initiative – $30 million. Radcliffe also supports the International Crisis Group, where Giustra sits on the executive committee. ICG was funded/founded by George Soros.   The ICG provides ‘advice’ to the United Nations, European Union and the World Bank.

Giustra is a current member of the Board of Directors of the Clinton Foundation.

So. It would appear that Mz. Heather Digby Partom has NOT done much homework in her Salon appointment as defender of Hillary, and may have opened an even greater swamp of insects to swat…

Muslim Dual Citizenship; The Lawsuit Awards We Pay

A small protest in Canada was said to be against Trudeau, high taxation and an award that the Canadian government gave to Omar Khadr in the amount of $10.5 million. Antifa showed up and caused a ruckus claiming that the protest was racially motivated by white supremacists, the new go to for ‘everything’. 

There was exactly ‘one’ media article to this regard. Granted it was copy/pasted to a select few outlets, it read verbatim. Not exactly journalistic material.

But the point regarding monetary awards was worth researching. Citizenship is the marker.

Every year in the US upwards of nearly 100,000 Muslim immigrants are naturalized wherein they care given ‘dual citizenship’. Within that marker, they can freely travel back and forth between any and all Muslim countries for years at a time while enjoying the welfare and benefits provided by the US and socialist Canada.

Case in point – Canada:

Ahmed Khadr moved to Canada from Egypt, called Pakistan his home, was a known Al Qaeda affiliate, and fought for the Taliban in Afghanistan. When his son Omar was 15, Ahmed took him to fight alongside Al Qaeda with him. While in Afghanistan, Omar allegedly shot and killed an American soldier, was captured and taken to Guantanamo Bay. He pled guilty to the charges believing that Canada would rescue him given his age. They didn’t, he ultimately sued and won $10.5 million from Trudeau.

This is just one case that illustrates the entire point of Trump’s Travel Ban. And again, the Hawaiian judge who shot down the ban? There are NO MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS in Hawaii.

Similar case, lots of money, Maher Arar. Only he wasn’t born in Canada, but immigrated with his ‘unknown’ parents and took dual Syrian/Canadian citizenship. He too was awarded multi-millions after he was deported to Syria by the US where he was imprisoned for 10 months before being freed to Canada. He too was issued a judgment for $10.5 million.

The problem with these cases is multiple, however the backers of both Khadr and Arar have a common focal – Soros. The backers include; Alliance For Justice, Center For Constitutional Rights, Campaign For Liberty, International Justice Network, Center For Justice and Accountability, Human Rights Advocates, and Center For Victims of Torture.

What these ‘nonprofits’ seem to be targeting are lawsuits against the US and Canadian governments on behalf of Muslim citizens who have acquired ‘dual citizenship’. And the number of lawsuits is becoming quite staggering.

In 2015 two Muslim truck drivers sued because they were fired for not delivering beer citing religious liberty – with the help and intervention of Obama, they won $240,000.

CAIR has filed a class-action lawsuit against the US government claiming that ‘terror watch lists are discriminatory’.

A Muslim teen claimed Abercrombie and Fitch discriminated against her because she was required to wear appropriate clothing. She won – millions.

A lawsuit was filed in NY Federal District Court against the police claiming that stings and infiltrating Muslim neighborhoods as plainclothes officers was illegally targeting, and religious profiling.

Who is filing these lawsuits?

The Brennan Center For Justice, whose president, Michael Waldman worked under Bill Clinton, is one. They have also lobbied extensively for raising minimum wage, oppose voter ID laws, and advocate for public funding of elections. They have also represented detainees from Guantanamo.

Another organization is the Iranian Alliance Across Borders, who receives it’s funding from the PARSA Foundation, whose Board members include Matthew Symonds from “The Economist”, a Rothschild agenda, and Vartan Gregorian who also sits on the board of “Human Rights Watch”, a Soros agenda child.

The irony is the fact that ultimately US and Canadian taxpayers are paying millions of dollars in lawsuits perpetrated by the Soros/Rothschild cabal, in order to monetize the Muslim community. I imagine those funds are then deposited into the Soros Hedge Fund wherein they will grow quite nicely…

While all the nasty white supremacists are left holding the tab.

Hate Crime in US – statistics of blame

There is no better place to find fodder for a blog, than in a Blog or even the Liberal commentaries within a Blog.

When the Blog begins with the notion that ‘blame’ is wholly Hypocritical and a male thing, or a Republican thing, or a Christian thing, the uh-ohs begin. Because ultimately, the Blog will find a place to place – the Blame – without understanding that the hypocrisy has come full circle.

Commentaries are even more ridiculous. When a commentator has nothing to defend their point, they immediately revert to defamation of character. And they don’t beat around the bush – they go for the gut and glory.

One such Blame I have found is that Trump is the cause of the ‘spike in hate crimes’. Actually, hate crimes against Muslims began a steady rise in 2012, during the Obama Presidency.   It is also worth discussing who is committing the hate crimes, against whom, and why is it that hate that is targeted against white people is NOT counted as a hate crime?  At least not by the Liberals.

No one would say they support hate crime, but it is important to maintain a level head regarding statistics: The number of incidences in 2013, as reported by the FBI, was 5,928. Out of a total US population of 330 million, that would represent .0018% of the population. Of those hate crimes, 3407 were racially motivated 67% per perpetrated against blacks, but 52% of those were white offenders. So now we can extrapolate that .0003% of the white population is responsible for some sort of a hate crime.

‘Hate Crime” is defined within multiple categories:  assault, rape, intimidation, property theft/damage, and murder. Of the total number of ‘hate crimes’ that resulted in murder, the percentage is .1% – or five people. Again no one is condoning crimes, it is just about showing the statistical divergences and disproportionate attention.

Despite these extremely low statistics, somehow, Hate Crime represents Trump and all other white people in the US…

According to the same FBI, in 2013 the number of blacks killed by whites stood at .77 per 1 million. By contrast, the number of whites killed by blacks was 9.83 per 1 million. Ten times more.   In 2007, there were 14,000 assaults on white women by black men.  Versus ALL total hate crimes = 5,928.

The problem with statistics, is they actually reveal truth.

The number of hate crimes committed by whites ‘pales’ in comparison to the total crimes committed against whites by blacks. But diverting this focus to an agenda of ‘hate crime’ serves two purposes: Division. Hate.

It extends a justification for blacks to commit more crime. It subjugates whites. And it sets up a nation for an even greater agenda – civil war. Unfounded in statistics, but energized by shadows who see the fall of the US as an end game.

The writer of this fodder article takes it a few steps further blaming Trump for the ‘cold blooded murder of Muslims, ICE agents rounding up Latinos, and threatening Jews with the oven! WOW! None of this occurred until Trump was President… WOW!

According to the FBI, the number of religious motivated hate crimes involved 1223 victims. Of those, 61% were Jewish, 13.7% were Muslim, 6.1% were Catholic, and 3.8 were Protestant. That means that a total of 167 Muslims were the target of hate crimes… compared to 746 Jews. What we don’t know is who were the perpetrators in these cases.   Were Muslims targeting Jews?

Lastly, this woman alleges that what we have today is “Trump’s America” and a Revolution is a means to vengeance.

The statistics I cited were Obama’s America. The causes have been inflated way out of proportion.   But the anger has most definitely been incited, the bitterness is overwhelming, and the desire to destroy profound. All in the name of Peace.   I see it so often cited by people who define themselves as pacifists, lovers, embedded in tolerance, embracing, kind, and yet – somehow they can’t see the mirror, the reflection that they promote is far different. Death threats are justified. Assault is justified. Because it comes in ‘their name of peace’.

Unfortunately, many, if not most of these outlets promoting victimhood, are also promoting Dissent and Revolution. Which fuels conservatives to ‘buy more guns’ out of fear of these peace loving revolutionaries who just want us all – dead.