Pocahontas vs. Trump

A number of Twitterers are all atweet about a 1993 video that is making the rounds in which Trump argues with the Indian Affairs Committee about their discriminatory practice of giving unlimited gambling licenses to anyone claiming Native American tribal heritage, and most being exempt from taxation. If one looks at the various articles dating from that time frame, the consensus of the media was in agreement that this was an unfair, discriminatory practice that was being corrupted for fraudulent purposes by people claiming Native American heritage that was ‘questionable’.

Many Native American tribes are common, but today there are 572 federally recognized tribes in the US and hundreds more applications pending. Only half of those tribes are associated with reservations, and some tribes boast membership of just a couple hundred. Prior to 1970 when the Indian Affairs Committee was formed, over 20 states had zero Indian population whereas today that population magically now ‘exists’ and is privy to millions of dollars of subsidies and government entitlements.

For example the Ho-Chunk tribe claims membership of about 7000 Native Americans. They operate ‘SIX” casino’s, and own about 4600 acres of land – ‘in trust”, nontaxable.  Not privileged?  Not discriminatory?

The first Native American casino was established in Florida in the 1970’s by the Seminole Tribe and was recognized in a Supreme Court lawsuit in 1979 that stated the state had no jurisdiction to regulate the activities on a reservation. Nor could the state tax the profits.

The law states that Indians do not pay taxes on any revenue generated from land held in ‘trust’. In addition, given that ‘tribes’ act as separate and distinct governments, tax revenue is given to them, not the state or federal government. Therefore, when the gambling licenses became fodder, the enormous creed of corruption rose as well. As long as the ‘tribe’ is the licensee, the profits are not taxed.

Enter – mafia, cons, and frauds to manage ‘said property’.

Trump recognized this duplicity and took it to court. The number of ‘recognized Native America Tribes’ suddenly rose from a handful to nearly 600. Coincidence? Hardly.

It was this hypocrisy, this discrimination that Trump fought in the 1993 video that the left is going crazy about given his Pocahontas comment regarding the fake Native American – Elizabeth Warren. She, not Trump, corrupted and connived. She, not Trump manipulated and defrauded. And yet, the commentary would be about the ‘derogatory terminology’. Not the misappropriation of funds via false and misleading statements… aka, Elizabeth Warren.

In 2009, the revenue from Indian reservation gambling was estimated to be over $26.5 billion annually – not taxed. The actual number cannot be determined since it is non-reportable, but it is said to represent upwards of 43% of ALL gaming revenue in the US today!  I’d say that deserved a Congressional hearing!    Rather significant. But discussion – is not – politically correct, because the Native Americans are all, to this day, devout victims and we are all, to this day, perpetrators of the most vile. What seems to elude the perpetrator victimhood is that this would mean that every EU citizen is also responsible since our ancestry is predominantly from the EU. Oddly, despite this fact, Europeans instead chastise Americans as though this ancestry does not exist… they exclude themselves, although they are us according to genealogy and thus are the core perpetrators.

IN 1993, the year that Trump’s video was made, the New York Times was vocal about the heinous evolution of the gambling initiatives that were so discriminatory and hypocritical, stating in fact that Indian tribes that have taken advantage of the law have found it to be highly profitable.”

The NY Times goes on to delve into the discrepancy in attempting to determine if in fact a person or persons, or ‘tribe’ is in fact legitimate stating that records of identity are difficult if not incomplete, if not impossible to verify.

Which might explain why and how Warren was able to con her heritage, which was subsequently proven to be faked.

Why is it so important?

Because, the Federal government and the state governments have adopted rather largess subsidies and monetary awards for those who thus identify. And of course, no one would dare take advantage of those ‘awards’, ever…

FYI: Years ago while on a trek in Sante Fe with a girlfriend we bar hopped with a ‘Native American’ who confided that despite the fact that both his parents were well endowed physicians, making six figures each, because he was of the Native American percentage he was given; free college for eternity, free room and board, free monthly stipend, and more. When he decided one semester to take his ‘stipends’ and travel throughout Europe at our expense, once discovered, his wrists were slapped and he was told, “no, no, no, don’t do that again…” and put back into college for his 8-10th year.

IS THIS A PROBLEM? Yes. Is it a politically correct topic? Apparently NO.

What the 1993 video reveals is a failed government agenda that attempted to right a heinous wrong perpetrated centuries ago for which we are supposed to pay into eternity.   What Trump attempted to expose – was The Swamp that had taken control of that legal glitch – aka, the mafia.  And somehow – today, the story told is altered in the hopes that the 1993 media will be squelched…

But what is even more absurd about the entire hoopla is the fact that Elizabeth Warren’s actual heritage is Reed and Herring, both of which are rooted in English and German genealogy, both of which were instrumental in the wars against the Native Americans … therefore, she should be made to pay for the errs of her ancestors. Not to mention faking an identity to steal funds that could have been used by real Native Americans…

FUSION GPS – A TROLL

Mueller and The House Intelligence Committee have been quite busily investigating the Trump dossier and the possible collusion of Putin and Trump in engineering the election through Russian interference. The interference is said to have come through multiple outlets including trolling operations conducted by the Russian Firm, Internet Research, Ltd.   The trolls are said to infiltrate through social media, including Facebook and Google, whereby fake accounts were established in order to discredit Hillary and sway the public opinion toward Trump.

Fusion GPS was hired by the DNC, the GOP and ultimately Hillary to create the Trump Dossier. The purpose? To discredit Trump through fake documents leaked to the press – ie, Trolling. The leak initially came from McCain – a true hero of Soros and Hillary.

In 2014, Glen Greenwald exposed the fact that GCHQ and ‘western governments’ were complicit in quite actively employing ‘Trolls’, the purpose of which was to discredit religion, beliefs, news, blogs, media, and establish fake victims, fake accounts, and fake news. One UK based group Greenwald identifies is Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group.

In addition to working with various agencies within GCHQ, such as M15, M16, other customers include The Bank of England and the Department for Schools, Children and Families.

The interesting ‘connection’ here is M16. Because Fusion GPS brokered the deal with Christopher Steele whose claim to fame is the fact that he was formerly with – M16. While both M15 and M16 are British intelligence, M15 is considered domestic, while M16 is international, they are both under the umbrella of GCHQ.

This could possibly indicate that Trolls manipulating the US election didn’t just originate in Russia, but also from GCHQ.  

Fusion GPS is also attempting to redact the names of journalists it purportedly paid in the course of their election manipulation document.   However, Steele claims he had a series of meetings with journalists from; The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, The New Yorker and Yahoo News. All these media outlets have one thing in common – a Liberal Democrat pro-Hillary affiliation.

When GCHQ was asked by Greenwald to comment, their response was:
“…all of GCHQ’s work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorized, necessary and proportionate, and that there is rigorous oversight, including from the Secretary of State, the Interception and Intelligence Services Commissioners, and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee.”

At the time, the Secretary of State would have been – Hillary Clinton.

Most of the testimony regarding the Russian influence in the election is coming from organizations that are linked back to Navalny, a highly publicized and backed activist in Russia who is stridently critical of Putin. Navalny has links to Soros, but shortly after those links were publicized, another Troll operation, Citizen Lab, debunked the connection claiming it was a Trolling/hacking scheme. And since then, a third organization, CyberBerkut, claims that CitizenLab was actually a Troll hired to debunk the Troll that connected Navalny to Soros!!  So we have a Troll connected to Soros, trolling, and another Troll debunking, only to have another Troll debunk the troll’s debunking.

And yet, our Intelligence Division along with Meuller is aghast at the possibility of Russian Trolls? HELP ME HERE!

Where is Leslie Neilson when you need him?   This sounds like a Hollywood Spoof!

What this circles back to is the notion that the Russian Trolls may actually have been hired by the DNC and Hillary to persuade the election, but it didn’t work because there may have been ‘other Russian Trolls’ working to counter the Hillary Russian Trolls. All the while, the US and UK under Obama and Cameron employed their Trolls to troll the trolls via Facebook and Google, the CEO’s of both of which are avowed Democrat party members.

It is also of note that the anti-Russian, Citizen Lab, is based in Toronto, Ronald Deibert is the creator, CEO, whose former accomplishments include research scholar for the Ford Foundation, which is quite entrenched in the Soros Open Society Foundation. In addition he is an advisor for Tor, an organization that is built on software enabling anonymous communication – aka – Trolls.

It gets Worse.

The bulk of the funding for Tor comes from the federal government through DARPA and the Office of Naval Research…

Worse.

One of the initial supporters of Tor include Human Rights Watch, a Soros organization funded by his Open Society. The other initiator and supporter includes the International Broadcasting Bureau which was formed during Clinton’s presidency… and the longest serving Director was appointed by Obama.

These are the TROLLS.

Project Veritas has released actual undercover video of the New York Times homepage Editor, Des Shoe, cockily admitting that the NYT tried to ‘influence the election with their articles and reporting’! An ADMISSION.   So where is the outrage?   Further, she goes on to laughingly decry, tauting anti-Trump articles has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with vamping more subscriptions with Enquirer style headliners. TRUTH? Not even a consideration.

The hypocrisy is blatant, and yet it isn’t just the Democrats, the Maxine Waters wagging gnarly fingers and screaming, it’s the GOP Swamp fearfully coveting their access to greed, fraud, manipulation and sex all within a fundamentally opaque guise that their secrets will not be revealed… unless…

Meuller! Meuller! WAKE UP. Class is in Sessions.

Roy Moore – Sex Allegations Crumbling?

The legal age for marriage in Alabama is 16. In order to be charged with sexual misconduct in Alabama in 1975, a person would have to engage in sexual intercourse.  

Leigh Corfman age 53, claims that in 1979 at the age of 14, she was inappropriately touched by Republican candidate for Senate, Roy Moore who is currently age 70 and was at the time 32.  

Corfman claims that she did not come forward before because she was strapped financially having declared bankruptcy sometime in 1990’s, and because she was not a saint.   She says at the time she was approached by Moore, her mother was in a custody hearing and Moore was an older guy hitting on her and she thought that was cool.

Despite the fact that she told her mother ten years later of the contact, her mother did not make a report either.

Failure to make a report of suspected child abuse carries a misdemeanor charge with a possible prison sentence and a $500 fine.

While the Washington Post claims that Moore sexually abused Corfman, according to The Law Library, sexually explicit conduct is defined as:   “Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

 There was no sexual intercourse, and no exhibition. Was the contact inappropriate if it did occur? Yes. Was it illegal if it did occur?  That is legally debatable.

Of course it was arguably a stacked deck ready to swing the pendulum to the far right as the slew of allegations have come forth in the Liberal Hollywood sector.   Tit-for-Tat.

McCain has come forward to make this his own personal self righteous mission as he demands Moore step down immediately, forthwith, etc…   But, McCain is certainly not without his own crumbling deck abandoning his crippled wife to marry for money in order to gain the political power edge he craved.  McCain’s own political career occurred only one year after marrying the wealthy daughter of Jim Hensley who made his millions in the beer industry.   Hensley was the subject of investigations for his relationship and business dealings with Kemper Marley, a bookmaker with ties to the Mafia who purportedly ordered the car bomb hit of journalist Don Bolles just before he planned to expose the collusion of politicians with the Mafia.  Did McCain have some assistance in his rather fast tracked political career?

Two other unnamed women, who were purportedly 16 and 18 at the time claim Moore tried to date the have also come forward.  But there was no impropriety, simply a kiss and a date.   The 16 year old actually did not date him at all because her mother forbade it.  The 18-19 did, and Moore was a perfect gentleman.   So why is this even news?

Now, it has come to light that one of the women making the accusation of ‘dating’ worked as a sign language interpreter for – Hillary, aka Clinton.

“And all the King’s horses, and all the King’s men came tumbling down, – again…”

All these allegations took place 38 years ago. And never did any of these women come forth to police, or anyone else until now when the Democrat hopeful, Doug Jones, appears to be at a solid loss in the polls and the dirt, she come a flyin’!!  In 1997, Jones was appointed to US District Attorney by Bill Clinton.   Between 1984 and 1997, Jones was employed in private practice – however, apparently there is no record of where in Birmingham.  Which seems a bit odd given it is his longest stint of employment…

According to Breitbart, Jones affiliated himself with the Brennan Center for Justice which is the recipient of numerous grants totaling over $& million – from the Soros Open Society Foundation.   Jones would also be aligned with Black Youth Vote, NAACP, Alliance for Justice (another Soros organization), and CAF, a radical organization that partnered with the Occupy Movement.

Not exactly the best resume material.

To find a down-and-out woman barely making ends meet and offer her a stipend to make a baseless unproveable claim that occurred 38 years ago – is a bit stretchy…  but it may be exactly what the Clinton/Soros Democrats have tried, finding nothing else.  Rather lame.

Of course McCain, a known Soros partner, has demanded that Moore step down immediately and concede despite the fact that these allegations have no proof of substantiation.

If we were to call out McCain on his own past transgressions, there were allegations that he was negligently instrumental in starting the fire on the USS Forrestal in 1967 that killed 134 sailors. McCain subsequently denied the allegations, but if we were to impose the same judicial sentencing, should he not have immediately stepped down from political life beneath ‘the allegation’ – as he is stating Roy Moore must do?

It seems the Democrats are definitely losing their grip if this is as good as it gets…

Paradise Paper Caper – Who’s Who

The Paradise Papers have unraveled a web of offshore dealings far more intricate, complex and massive than the Panama Paper Caper. Comprised of over 13 million documents, the magnitude would appear to leave no one immune, but oddly, the headlines continually show Trump at the forefront as though he is the leader of the pack, when in reality, to date, he is not personally implicated at all…

In addition, headlines would tout the “massive dollars offshore accounts contributed to the Trump election”  through private means, ie, $60 million, while truly failing to headline that the actual leaders within the disclosures include; Credit Suisse, Soros, Apple, Facebook, Nike, Siemens, Google, Trudeau’s closest friend and Liberal Party fundraiser, Maciel, a Catholic Priest, Madonna, Bono, Chuck Schumer, and a host of Democrat mega-conglomerates.

It is interesting that despite the fact that Soros is a major donor and supporter of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) credited with releasing the trove, Soros and The Open Society were quite prolific in their offshoring…and have declined comment on their role.

Obviously plastering Trump’s picture on the trove is media deflection to protect the true sullied faces of Zuckerberg, Soros, and Urs Rohner, Chairman of Credit Suisse. Lest we forget, in 2014 Credit Suisse pleaded guilty to tax evasion and fraud and paid a $2.6 billion fine.   And Soros companies are mainly non-profits, therefore the true offshore evasion would potentially indicate that charities are not the recipients of his funds at all, but perhaps the money is funneled through intricate webs back to it’s source – Soros.

One of the more fiendish finds was the fact that numerous US universities have been hiding hordes of cash in offshore accounts all the while demanding huge subsidies from the federal government, raking students with increased tuition and fees, and defrauding their true financial picture.

Bush’s brother is named, The Queen of England is named, as well as Warren Stephens a conservative presidential donor who is behind massive ‘anti-Trump’ campaigns.

Putting Trump on the face of this leak is an obvious fraud and a rather lame intent to defraud, deflect and hide.

Guilt By Association is a collective concept that declares that members of a group can be held responsible for the actions of one. If we were to apply this same theory to Soros, that would imply that Obama, Clinton, McCain and a host of others should be heralded with their pictures splashed across headlines – as the offshore perpetrators.

While the actual use of offshore accounts is not illegal, sometimes they are used to circumvent the law and to launder money. It’s a black market of sorts in which organized crime finds a legal means to invest illegally obtained funds. They are used to hide assets and to evade taxes. Insurance and reinsurance companies are notorious for utilizing these havens, not just for their companies, but their executives as well make use of the advantage to avoid taxes.

Trump’s new tax reform addresses this evasion by offering a one time reprieve at a significantly lower tax rate for reclaiming into the US monetary system the trillions that are floating.

It would see that the same individuals advocating against Trump’s tax reform are the exact same ones who utilize this offshore evasion loophole. Because bringing that money back into the system will have an enormous positive effect on the economy – which would not boost the Democrat agenda.

So how do they defeat the revelations? Manipulation. The media is claiming that over 120 US politicians are implicated in the release and yet they reveal mostly those who have some relationship with Trump or the GOP Party.

While the journalists pour over the trove of 13 million documents, what is actually released to the public will most likely lean toward the agenda of the journalist’s media conglomerate… and not the agenda of Truth.

At least, that is what they are doing now…

 

Hillary’s Uranium One Deal – 101

Heather Digby Parton, a blogger for Salon, has taken it upon herself to post a meme in which she ‘soundly’ exonerates Hillary Clinton’s role in the Uranium One Scandal.   She incorrectly states that the entire deal had nothing to do with governments because it was and is a ‘private company, ruled by private board members and that ‘other committee members within the US government’ could have intervened, but didn’t, including:   “the secretaries of the Treasury, homeland security, energy and defense; the White House budget director; the attorney general; and the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.”

By default, is Digby actually opening a Pandora’s Box in implicating accomplices?

Those other people would include; Timothy Geithner; worked under Bill Clinton, involved in numerous questionable decisions during the subprime mortgage crisis and a member of Bilderberg Group and Council on Foreign Relations. Janet Napolitano; whose resume is a plethora of critcisms and empty apologies after making incorrect statements, targeted statements, right wing attack statements, etc…   Peter Orszag; also a Bilderberger, also served under Billy, and Austan Goolsbee who was instrumental in Obama’s Senatorial run in 2004…

Hillary became Secretary of State in 2009. Uranium One’s deals were subject to anti-trust regulations and required approval and clearance by the US Committee on Foreign Investments. The State Department was a voting member of the Committee, the others included Geithner, Napolitano, Steven Chu, Robert Gates who had according to Times Magazine, “formed a formidable partnership with Hillary Clinton”, – and Eric Holder… need I say more.

This is the Committee that approved the Uranium One deal.

Back-tracking:  In 2005, Billy and Frank Giustra traveled to Kazakhstan after which Giustra’s company, UrAsia Energy, bought rich uranium interests there. In 2007, Uranium One acquired controlling interest in UrAsia Energy from Frank Giustra. Substantial contributions to the Clinton Foundation followed ultimately leading to the creation of the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative in which he contributed $100 million and pledged 50% of all future earnings from ‘mining’.

As of 2013, the Russian company ARMZ had complete control of Uranium One, and shortly thereafter, that interest was extinguished and transferred to Rosatom, which is Russia’s state owned uranium monopoly. At this point, Hillary had resigned to establish her run for Presidency, and John Kerry was the acting Secretary of State.

It was during this time that revenue from the Clinton Foundation and the Giustra Initiative would rocket in the moola in the realm of $340 million annually with a piddling 6% actual charitable payout. It was later revealed that the returns had been falsely prepared and were required to be restated. No charges were filed for these discrepancies.

It is estimated that Hillary’s failed presidential run cost between $1.2 and $1.7 billion, more than any Democrat in history.

In addition to mining, Giustra has quite a background making billions in a variety of industries including entertainment, via Thunderbird Films, Lionsgate Reunion Pictures and UK based Soda Pictures.

In addition, he established the Radcliffe Foundation which also contributed to the Clinton Initiative – $30 million. Radcliffe also supports the International Crisis Group, where Giustra sits on the executive committee. ICG was funded/founded by George Soros.   The ICG provides ‘advice’ to the United Nations, European Union and the World Bank.

Giustra is a current member of the Board of Directors of the Clinton Foundation.

So. It would appear that Mz. Heather Digby Partom has NOT done much homework in her Salon appointment as defender of Hillary, and may have opened an even greater swamp of insects to swat…

Muslim Dual Citizenship; The Lawsuit Awards We Pay

A small protest in Canada was said to be against Trudeau, high taxation and an award that the Canadian government gave to Omar Khadr in the amount of $10.5 million. Antifa showed up and caused a ruckus claiming that the protest was racially motivated by white supremacists, the new go to for ‘everything’. 

There was exactly ‘one’ media article to this regard. Granted it was copy/pasted to a select few outlets, it read verbatim. Not exactly journalistic material.

But the point regarding monetary awards was worth researching. Citizenship is the marker.

Every year in the US upwards of nearly 100,000 Muslim immigrants are naturalized wherein they care given ‘dual citizenship’. Within that marker, they can freely travel back and forth between any and all Muslim countries for years at a time while enjoying the welfare and benefits provided by the US and socialist Canada.

Case in point – Canada:

Ahmed Khadr moved to Canada from Egypt, called Pakistan his home, was a known Al Qaeda affiliate, and fought for the Taliban in Afghanistan. When his son Omar was 15, Ahmed took him to fight alongside Al Qaeda with him. While in Afghanistan, Omar allegedly shot and killed an American soldier, was captured and taken to Guantanamo Bay. He pled guilty to the charges believing that Canada would rescue him given his age. They didn’t, he ultimately sued and won $10.5 million from Trudeau.

This is just one case that illustrates the entire point of Trump’s Travel Ban. And again, the Hawaiian judge who shot down the ban? There are NO MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS in Hawaii.

Similar case, lots of money, Maher Arar. Only he wasn’t born in Canada, but immigrated with his ‘unknown’ parents and took dual Syrian/Canadian citizenship. He too was awarded multi-millions after he was deported to Syria by the US where he was imprisoned for 10 months before being freed to Canada. He too was issued a judgment for $10.5 million.

The problem with these cases is multiple, however the backers of both Khadr and Arar have a common focal – Soros. The backers include; Alliance For Justice, Center For Constitutional Rights, Campaign For Liberty, International Justice Network, Center For Justice and Accountability, Human Rights Advocates, and Center For Victims of Torture.

What these ‘nonprofits’ seem to be targeting are lawsuits against the US and Canadian governments on behalf of Muslim citizens who have acquired ‘dual citizenship’. And the number of lawsuits is becoming quite staggering.

In 2015 two Muslim truck drivers sued because they were fired for not delivering beer citing religious liberty – with the help and intervention of Obama, they won $240,000.

CAIR has filed a class-action lawsuit against the US government claiming that ‘terror watch lists are discriminatory’.

A Muslim teen claimed Abercrombie and Fitch discriminated against her because she was required to wear appropriate clothing. She won – millions.

A lawsuit was filed in NY Federal District Court against the police claiming that stings and infiltrating Muslim neighborhoods as plainclothes officers was illegally targeting, and religious profiling.

Who is filing these lawsuits?

The Brennan Center For Justice, whose president, Michael Waldman worked under Bill Clinton, is one. They have also lobbied extensively for raising minimum wage, oppose voter ID laws, and advocate for public funding of elections. They have also represented detainees from Guantanamo.

Another organization is the Iranian Alliance Across Borders, who receives it’s funding from the PARSA Foundation, whose Board members include Matthew Symonds from “The Economist”, a Rothschild agenda, and Vartan Gregorian who also sits on the board of “Human Rights Watch”, a Soros agenda child.

The irony is the fact that ultimately US and Canadian taxpayers are paying millions of dollars in lawsuits perpetrated by the Soros/Rothschild cabal, in order to monetize the Muslim community. I imagine those funds are then deposited into the Soros Hedge Fund wherein they will grow quite nicely…

While all the nasty white supremacists are left holding the tab.

Hate Crime in US – statistics of blame

There is no better place to find fodder for a blog, than in a Blog or even the Liberal commentaries within a Blog.

When the Blog begins with the notion that ‘blame’ is wholly Hypocritical and a male thing, or a Republican thing, or a Christian thing, the uh-ohs begin. Because ultimately, the Blog will find a place to place – the Blame – without understanding that the hypocrisy has come full circle.

Commentaries are even more ridiculous. When a commentator has nothing to defend their point, they immediately revert to defamation of character. And they don’t beat around the bush – they go for the gut and glory.

One such Blame I have found is that Trump is the cause of the ‘spike in hate crimes’. Actually, hate crimes against Muslims began a steady rise in 2012, during the Obama Presidency.   It is also worth discussing who is committing the hate crimes, against whom, and why is it that hate that is targeted against white people is NOT counted as a hate crime?  At least not by the Liberals.

No one would say they support hate crime, but it is important to maintain a level head regarding statistics: The number of incidences in 2013, as reported by the FBI, was 5,928. Out of a total US population of 330 million, that would represent .0018% of the population. Of those hate crimes, 3407 were racially motivated 67% per perpetrated against blacks, but 52% of those were white offenders. So now we can extrapolate that .0003% of the white population is responsible for some sort of a hate crime.

‘Hate Crime” is defined within multiple categories:  assault, rape, intimidation, property theft/damage, and murder. Of the total number of ‘hate crimes’ that resulted in murder, the percentage is .1% – or five people. Again no one is condoning crimes, it is just about showing the statistical divergences and disproportionate attention.

Despite these extremely low statistics, somehow, Hate Crime represents Trump and all other white people in the US…

According to the same FBI, in 2013 the number of blacks killed by whites stood at .77 per 1 million. By contrast, the number of whites killed by blacks was 9.83 per 1 million. Ten times more.   In 2007, there were 14,000 assaults on white women by black men.  Versus ALL total hate crimes = 5,928.

The problem with statistics, is they actually reveal truth.

The number of hate crimes committed by whites ‘pales’ in comparison to the total crimes committed against whites by blacks. But diverting this focus to an agenda of ‘hate crime’ serves two purposes: Division. Hate.

It extends a justification for blacks to commit more crime. It subjugates whites. And it sets up a nation for an even greater agenda – civil war. Unfounded in statistics, but energized by shadows who see the fall of the US as an end game.

The writer of this fodder article takes it a few steps further blaming Trump for the ‘cold blooded murder of Muslims, ICE agents rounding up Latinos, and threatening Jews with the oven! WOW! None of this occurred until Trump was President… WOW!

According to the FBI, the number of religious motivated hate crimes involved 1223 victims. Of those, 61% were Jewish, 13.7% were Muslim, 6.1% were Catholic, and 3.8 were Protestant. That means that a total of 167 Muslims were the target of hate crimes… compared to 746 Jews. What we don’t know is who were the perpetrators in these cases.   Were Muslims targeting Jews?

Lastly, this woman alleges that what we have today is “Trump’s America” and a Revolution is a means to vengeance.

The statistics I cited were Obama’s America. The causes have been inflated way out of proportion.   But the anger has most definitely been incited, the bitterness is overwhelming, and the desire to destroy profound. All in the name of Peace.   I see it so often cited by people who define themselves as pacifists, lovers, embedded in tolerance, embracing, kind, and yet – somehow they can’t see the mirror, the reflection that they promote is far different. Death threats are justified. Assault is justified. Because it comes in ‘their name of peace’.

Unfortunately, many, if not most of these outlets promoting victimhood, are also promoting Dissent and Revolution. Which fuels conservatives to ‘buy more guns’ out of fear of these peace loving revolutionaries who just want us all – dead.

2nd Amendment: Mass Shootings, White Supremacy and Deception

The British and Australians would seem to believe that their way is the right way, and the way of the US is the wrong way when it comes to many issues, the most prevalent and recent being – Gun Control.

Every murderous event repays the exact same sentiment, ignores the same statistics, and blames Republicans and Conservatives. Cuba. They have the same murder rate as the US – and NO personal guns. Venezuela. They have the second highest murder rate in the world. Brazil. Columbia, El Salvador. Honduras. Africa.

What are the common denominators, because what these poor, impoverished people don’t have is – guns?     Corruption. Drugs. Gangs. Poverty.

Piers Morgan, a Brit, has had numerous debates with various proponents that advocate the upholding of the US 2nd Amendment. And while the laws within the 2nd Amendment have been tweeked and retweeked, each time there is a catastrophic event, Piers Morgan is in the limelight once again making his proclamations and demonstrative arguments for which he repeatedly fails to actually elicit statistical proof. Instead, he seems to serve more as a victim of debate failure.

The 2nd Amendment was created because in 1689 a British King, James II, attempted to establish a Monarchial edict whereby Catholics could own weapons, and Protestants could not. Codified in the English Bill of Rights, Parliament saw the ‘evil and subversion’ in this far reaching authority of the Crown and quashed it. The US was created to escape British rule – including the ability to make proclamations such as gun ownership.

The 2nd Amendment was created so that the over-reaching power of the government could not take away an inalienable right to bear arms whether to fight tyranny, organize a militia, or to protect their family and property.   The US would NOT bow to English Monarchial attempts to subvert The People, all the people.

The argument against armed citizenry was the notion that the government army would not be powerful enough to squash a militia should a government military takeover be instituted. And this control over the people was paramount.   Noah Webster was against citizen armament and stated, “Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

In other words, if the federal government, on any pretense, wanted to declare Martial Law, if citizens were armed, Martial Law would not prevail.

Piers Morgan believes that if multiple round guns are eliminated, there will be no more mass shootings… which of course is extremely short-sighted and simplistic. If we truly want to find a solution, then looking at those countries whose statistics and demographics might help us gain insight is much more productive.

Australia argues that it isn’t an immigration issue because they have an immigrant population of 28% and a significantly low murder rate.   But they’ve always had a low murder rate, even before they instituted gun control measures. What they don’t mention is the fact that ‘MOST” immigration visa’s are ‘Skilled Occupation” which was instituted in 1996, the same year they instituted reformed gun control. As a result, they prime select who is allowed to immigrate, the rest are deported or put in a 4 year detention facility on a remote island!   That, my friend, is Cherry Picking!  Of the approximate 4.75million immigrants that are accounted by country of origin, 1.3million come from countries that might be considered ‘border-line’.   The rest come from the UK, Germany, France, US, New Zealand, China, Italy, etc… to either work in a pre-approved field, or to go to university. Still, a disproportionate amount of welfare monies are spent on immigrants.  Tch.  Tch.

Simply stating one part of the whole of the data has little value.

Of the Mass Shootings in the US during Obama’s tenure there are interesting demographics outside of the blame the GUNS rhetoric, and the racial identity is even more News Worthy:

1)   Fort Hood Massacre – 2009:   US Army Major and psychiatrist – Muslim, radicalized by al Qaeda; prior to shooting described as Schizoid, belligerent, Paranoid and disconnected.   Used 1 semi-automatic handgun with high capacity.

2)   Aurora Movie Theater Shooting – 2012: Growing up upper middle class, pursuing his PhD, his desire to kill was a ten year dream. He was seeing a psychiatrist and the school authorities were alerted to his potential threat weeks before.

3)   Newton School Shooting – 2012: Lanza grew up in a wealthy household, was diagnosed with Aspergers and was called ‘deeply troubled’. Used guns from his mother’s collection.

4)   San Bernardino Mass Shooting – 2015: Two American Muslims radicalized in Saudi Arabia to ISIS, they used two rifles

5)   Orlando Nightclub Massacre – 2016:  Muslim terrorist swore allegiance to ISIS and targeted the LGBT community. Used a semi-automatic rifle and a glock.

6)   Burlington, Washington – 2016; Arcan Cetin, an Hispanic male opened fire in a shopping mall killing five using a semi-automatic rifle.

7)  Rosenburg, Oregon – 2015: Harper-Mercer shot and killed 8 students and a teacher. He purchased his 14 weapons from southern California. He was discharged from the Army with mental issues, and diagnosed as having mental issues from a young age going to a special needs school. He described himself as being “mixed race”.

8) Chattanooga, Tennessee – 2015: Mohammod Youssuf Abdulazeez (safe to say he was Muslim) opened fire on a military center killing 5 and injuring 3.

9)   Charleston, SC – 2015: Dylann Roof, a white supremacist killed 9 black people at a Episcopal church.

10)   Isla Vista, CA – 2014: Born in the UK and of British and Malaysian race, diagnosed within the Autism spectre, and prescribed anti-psychotics for schizophrenia, he used his BMW, knives, and handguns, executing 6 and injuring 7.

11) Washington Navy Yard – 2013: Aaron Alexis, a Navy contractor and a black man, killed 13 and injured 3 using a shotgun and a pistol.

Out of eleven incidents – we have five Muslims, one black, two mixed race, one Hispanic, two whites previously diagnosed with mental illness, and one white supremacist.

And in fact, 23 ‘described’ mass shootings occurred under the Nobel Peace Prize winning – Obama.

Not exactly the all white male supremacists that the media is touting, or an angry white male professor is touting, or the Hollywooders at large – are touting!! Sometimes a bit of research unravels a lot of deception.

Fox News – Sexual Harassment? A Flakey Agenda

It would appear that specific ‘supposed’ GOP members are attempting to insert a bit of chaos into the fray of the Political mess that is now defined as Republican or GOP parlay. It’s something like a boxing match, the bell has rung and the two boxers are dancing in the ring taking jabs and making a few critical connections before dancing some more.

This time the young Mr. Jeff Flake would seem to be trying to make a name for himself as a contender in the ring. Joining the ranks of McCain and Graham as they fight to displace Trump, Flake’s motives are less than flattering. Since his 2013 tanked popularity rating, he has been joined at the hip with McCain, making sure that he votes exactly the same, walks the walk and talks the talk.

While his platforms does have a few conservative positions, he routinely sides with Democrats on major policies including – illegal immigration. No one is opposed to immigration when it is done legally, within the bounds of our Constitution, and in compliance with our society, laws and education.   Yet for some reason, this nuance fails to be acknowledged, and instead replaced with ‘evil conservatives don’t want to help the poor and the needy’.

Interestingly, Flake’s stated opposition to Trump stems from the Access Hollywood tape in which Trump makes crude comments about women. And it is this same mantra that appears to be making the rounds in levies against various conservative media hosts. Fox News – in particular.

Of course it’s a good tactic, utilizing women as a target to dismantle the largest conservative media outlet. No one can argue for the pointed perpetrator because they would then be labeled a sexist and dragged under the proverbial bus as well. As such, women are making accusations and sourcing them ‘anonymously to the media requiring investigations, firings, and suspensions.

Eric Bolling is the latest ‘victim’ to be charged anonymously.

Not alone, he joins; Charles Payne, Jamie Horowitz, Roger Ailes, and Bill O’Reilly, all of who have been charged within just the last nine months.   Payne’s are unique because it would seem to be an extra-marital affair gone sour as the woman tried to gain notoriety through Payne and her attempts failed

What is Sexual Harassment?

Legal definition: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct  of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment.

The term ‘unwelcome’ has come to be the loaded gun. Apparently, a woman can consent, but still claim it was ‘unwelcome’. While sexual harassment is a very real and very manipulative factor in the business world, it seems to be expanding rather exponentially into nearly every arena from universities to Uber, to science fields, to simply walking down the street. One woman’s monetary reward won’t change what has become a ‘culture’. To change a societal response requires changing the way it is portrayed in the media.   The Sex Industry has definitely fostered this burgeoning norm which objectifies a woman and objectifies sex.

Trump’s behavior, Fox News employee’s behavior, these are just a very miniscule atom of the larger universal picture that is not being dismantled, but instead is being used now as a tool to dismantle a select few.

Flake is attempting to capitalize on a pivitol moment and use it for his own gain and agenda instead of addressing what has become an out-of-control epidemic that will only get worse as we do absolutely nothing about it. Perhaps Flake would be better advised to tackle the real problem, the Porn Industry, the Sexual Exploitation Industry, instead of one man’s stupid quip.

With psychologists normalizing Porn, they are actually normalizing objectification of women and sex. They are supporting sexual harassment indirectly.   In the UK they are deciding whether it will be therapeutic to give pedophiles robotic boys and girls to ‘play with’.   Is that a cure?

Of course, given that somewhere between 70% and 90% of men enjoy the use of pornography, tackling that as a source of the learned behavior of sexual harassment is about nil to none.

SO, Mr. Jeff Flake, I would suggest if your hysterical reaction to Mr. Trump and his recorded statements is truly indefensible, attack the Porn Industry, the Sex Trafficking Industry, the sexual exploitation industry and the immigration issue that brings completely different sexual values and culture into the mainstream US and Europe. But then, you’d actually have to do something instead of bandwagoning with McCain and Graham… and I doubt that would uphold your true agenda.

DNC – Hack and Murder?

It is interesting who is “NOT” in the news of late; Obama and Hillary.  Nary a peep.  

Obama:   Apparently, the only news circulating right now is about how mean some people were to Michelle while she was First Lady because they called her names which of course meant that it was all racially motivated and the entire US is divided by race as evidenced by the fact that she was once pulled over in her car by the police – because she was black.   WHEW!   Or the time a random person crossed the street rather than walk into her. WOW!   But of course, the piece de resistance was when she donned her Hillary impression claiming that requiring a ‘certain kind of voter ID’ was racist.

Then she shed a few virtual tears.

As the audience filed out I imagine they shed a few racially provoked, white man obscenities toward our current President, just to make everything equal and fair…

Michelle’s nuance regarding voter ID’s coincides with Eric Holder suddenly appearing in the media as he radically denounces the Voter Fraud Commission headed by Kris Kobach. Blasting the Commission as not having statistical proof, the absurdity is glaring given that actual proof has been substantiated, not to mention the laughable 125% voter turnout record in Florida, or the 100% votes cast for one person – Obama – in numerous Pennsylvania districts. These are statistical facts and anomalies that Holder would rather term – racist.

So we now know that Obama and Holder are in fact colluding in the news by making the same radicalized, false statement within days of each other…  Ahhhh.

Meanwhile, Barrack Obama has been busily campaigning for another “Committee”, the National Redistricting Committee which aims to bring lawsuits against Republicans in states where Democrats lose a state race by claiming the loss was a result of ‘gerrymandering’.   The purpose of the Committee is to redraw state maps so that Districts voting Democrat will be more heavily weighted in the final voting process and be counted as Democrat.  Gee, no manipulation there.

Adding to the inert silence regarding Obama is the revelation that Wasserman Shultz and upwards of twenty DNC staffers utilized an IT team from Pakistan, namely Mr. Awan and Company, who is personally currently under arrest by the FBI after a lengthy investigation and his recent attempt to flee the country.  Of course, the Liberal media say this is all ‘racially motivated’, as in Islamophobia.  I wasn’t aware that the Liberal Media was more adept at criminal investigations than our FBI?  Silly me.

Could Mr. Awan have information about the DNC hack that the Clinton/Wasserman connection would rather be silenced? Could this revelation ignite an inquiry into the Seth Rich murder? Given the DNC, and by default Wasserman, adamantly proclaimed that the hack came from Russia, we now find that Mr. Awan might be persuaded to reveal – the Truth.   Of course, it is also concerning that Mr. Awan, a Pakistani, and his team were given security clearance in our government despite the high level of terrorist organizations that have infiltrated Pakistan.

It seems uniquely coincidental that Seth Rich was working within the same IT Department of the DNC during the time that Mr. Awan and Company were the go to IT Security Team…  An email hack occurred and Mr. Rich is subsequently murdered…

To date, the DNC hack has been attributed to Russia by The Washington Post, Snopes, and The New York Times. It is interesting that these media outlets have the ability to determine the conclusion of an ongoing investigation… And, of course, it is no coincidence that these organizations are all quite Liberal, Left leaning, Democrat subsidies.

Wasserman’s guilt is further highlighted by the fact that she continued to defend her team of Pakistani genius’s despite growing evidence of fraud and an attempt to flee the country while depositing large sums in a Pakistani bank account.   Could Clinton and Wasserman have orchestrated Awan’s failed attempt to flee the country via Qatar and Pakistan? Because he is now being represented by an associate of the Clintons.

IT questions abound in the Democrat Party. An Iranian hacker/IT genius was pardoned by Obama in 2015, Nima Golestaneh. The pardon involved exchanging seven Iranian prisoners for four Americans and soliciting the infamous Iranian nuke deal. Obviously a very win-win for Iran.   Golestaneh’s guilty plea was tied to the conspiracy to hack Vermont based, Arrow Tech.  Arrow Tech’s main product is computer software that helps calculate missile trajectories. Hacking that software would be something akin to old James Bond movie whereby a missile could be redirected to strike its source instead of the intended target.   A rather scary potential! Especially given, the man was pardoned.

Wasserman’s IT guy, Imran Awan, was only one of many Pakistani’s purportedly to have committed fraud while employed by the DNC and subsequently – fired. Now, despite the charges, Wasserman has fueled a racism conspiracy theory in which she and the attorney claim this is all about the fact that Awan is – Muslim.   This defense would follow Michelle Obama and Eric Holder’s epic racist commentaries just a few days ago…

Awan’s LinkedIn account states that he was the “Information Technology Director at US Congress and Computer & Network Security Consultant”.

Question? How is it that these Pakistani and Iranian hackers are hired within highly sensitive government and defense organizations and no one seems to question their clearance or security?   Is there no other IT expert that meets the same criteria or background? Are they somehow more competent than any other American IT expert? Awan is not an America citizen. Neither was Golestaneh.

Lest we forget; the Democrats seem not to be immune to IT scandals. Hillary Clinton’s server was scrubbed by Platte River Networks, whose CEO is Treve Suazo. Despite the illegalities, no one has yet to conclude with any convictions. Paul Combetta, who was implicated in the scrubbing was granted immunity from prosecution by Obama. No other charges have been filed…

But according to the Liberal Media – these are all just non-related coincidences and conspiracies.  The FBI doesn’t know what they are doing.  And the only problem here is – Trump…