US Terrorism Embraces A Liberal Totalitarian Regime

Gilroy Garlic Festival Shooting:

Santino William Legan identified as being Iranian and Italian. He was 19 when he planned to kill randomly. He advocated a book written in 1890 by Arthur Desmond titled, Might Is Right. A UK politician, Desmond wrote in support of egoist anarchy believing that there are no human rights, only the mighty shall survive. He called for men to take up arms for a ‘social revolution’. In 1892 he went to Australia and befriended William Morris Hughes, who later became PM.  Together they wrote a radical periodical titled, The New Order. Hughes was a member of the Nationalist Party which was formed as a merger of the Liberal Party and the Labor Party. His writings openly encouraged revolution against the government.

Dayton Ohio Shooting:

Connor Betts identified with Antifa.   He was 24 when he was killed. In his social accounts he revealed ‘extreme hatred’ of border enforcement. His tweets included, “Kill every Fascist”, and “Nazi’s deserve death and nothing else.”  However, in our topsy-turvydom world, in the view of Antifa, everyone conservative is a Fascist and Nazi.   Betts’ tweets became more and more violent calling for arming and training should Trump be re-elected. He demanded Socialism as the answer to all things Trump. He kept a kill list and a rape list.   He killed his sister, Megan a trans man, while she was in her car before going on his rampage.  It is believed she tried to stop him.

Antifa are White Supremacists. They hide behind masks.   They want violence and anarchy.   Oddly, they claim to be anti-racist and pro-gender equality, but they also encourage the means of assault, revolution, violence, and anarchy.   Much like the writing, Might Is Right.

El Paso Shooting:

Patrick Crusius is 21. An unsigned Manifesto is being attributed to him. It is written articulately and appears on the surface to be the writing of a highly educated person based on language, sentence structure, paragraph formation, etc…   Crusius was enrolled in a local community college and had been for 2 years. In Crusius’ manifesto, he claimed to support the ChristChurch mass shooting in New Zealand, Brenton Terrant, and his manifesto.   Terrant was linked to various Neo-Nazi organizations throughout Europe, including; Génération Identitaire. This was founded on premises manifested in earlier organizations that grew in the early 1900’s.   Their precept was formed by intellectuals of the period, including Carl Schmidt, 1888 to 1985. Schmidt brought forth legal action against the Prussian government in power over Germany. Prussia was anti-Marx.   The court allowed Schmitt’s demand for installing a Commissar.   And Germany became history.

He worked in the Hitler regime as counsel, and later, post- WWII, promoted the philosophy of The New World Order. He wrote the Nomos of The Earth in which he claims the Eurocentric Order dates from the discovery of the New World, aka, the America’s. He states that the US internal conflicts including, isolationism and interventionism, are global problems and central to the failure of The New World Order wherein dominion over man can only be established when unity of man is united against – other men.

His works have been expounded on with much debate over his Socialist vs liberal vs conservative ideologies.   Ultimately, it was concluded that his philosophy was a mashable version of all three.   This indistinguishable alliance could support the bizarre trend we see within the Democrat Party today wherein socialism, Marxism, and totalitarianism are the anarchical solutions.   This would align with Schmitt’s concept that democracy cannot sustain, only full and total control will achieve a united society.   This philosophy would trend with what is now being labeled internal terrorism.   Dividing and creating an enemy from within – ie conservatives.

In essence much of Europe installed this dictatorship, most evident is Germany under Merkel.

But the creation of Europe was innately for the purpose of usurping the power that had shifted to the US. Thus, we now know that the UK’s MI6 has been hugely instrumental in determining who will be our President. To take back control so that the New Liberal Order which is based on a Totalitarian regime will be our global future.   China’sXI Jinping is said to embrace Schmitt’s works.

Schmitt expounds on the ‘rulers vs the ruled’ advocating for a Totalitarian government much like Hitler or Stalin.   “Totalitarian regimes are often marked by political repressionpersonality cultismcontrol over the economyrestriction of speechmass surveillance and widespread use of state terrorism.” Such a regime is completely embedded in all aspects of control; social life, including the economy, education, art, science, private life and morals of citizens.

  1. Example – Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris have both expressed the desire to rule by Executive Order. That would be a totalitarian dictatorship.
  2. State Terrorism – the uptick in mass shootings wherein, as I have noted above, an anarchist rhetoric can be aligned and embedded in the minds of young males.
  3. The New World Order was originally labeled by Schmidt as The New Liberal Order.
  4. Control of education so as to manipulate thought, and indoctrinate and control minds, beliefs, and morals.
  5. Google, Facebook, Twitter = control and surveillance.

In actuality, these three recent shootings do have a common core that is not Trump, and not white males – it is anarchy so as to create greater division and lift the Liberal Agenda for a New World ruled by a totalitarian regime. Creating an enemy within, the conservative, is Nazi Germany, it is the latest horrific movie promoting the killing of ‘deplorables’ that has been tagged as pure evil. What it advocates is exactly what Schmidt hailed as the only means for dominion.

In the US political parties, we continue to see the Liberal meme calling for death, dismemberment, rape, and destruction for all Trump followers.    A civil war could envelop society cheered on by the Media as they glorify enhancing that schism so as to create a Liberal Order and the elimination of all other men/women.

What can we do?   HOLD ON TIGHT AND NOT react as they want us to.  Cruz is a perfect example – maintain civility.

Socialism In The US House…takes hold

With the Democrat House filing into DC they bring with them a new host of Socialists.  And one might gasp except that in 2010 the Socialist Party released a list of 70 Congressional Democrats who were also members of the Socialist Party of America.   They endorsed none other than John Kerry and Obama.  In the latest election 15 Socialists were elected to office across the US.  While the numbers may seem small from a percentage standpoint, they do reveal an evolution.   The EU Commission is comprised of Socialists, the UN is run by Social Democrats, and still, despite the collapse of Venezuela, the push continues.

In every Socialist state, the first death is that of the Middle Class.   Those who have much, have more, and those who had nothing, have something.   The fact that those who had nothing was a high percentage is what keeps the power operating.  Until it collapses.

And so the question arises, why does it collapse?

Opinion pieces are rampant in this discussion, most recently Bloomberg’s op-ed attempted to sway the discussion of Venezuela, and instead highlight the vast progress and effectiveness of Bolivia’s Socialist President, Morales.    The opinion piece claims there is a right way and a wrong way to do Socialism and lists Venezuela as the wrong way compared to Bolivia as the right way.  Noah Smith, the author of the piece bills himself as a neoliberal on his Twitter status.

But is Bolivia really a ‘right’ way, or is the author simply attempting to validate Socialism?

Bolivia’s President Morales continues to win re-election, not because his policies are good for Bolivia, but because he has given something to a population that had nothing, and virtually eliminated the Middle Class in the process.  He is elected by the poor, the 40% of the population living below poverty line.   Despite being given vast free assistance from Cuba and Brazil, Bolivia continues to rank in the bottom bowels of South America’s economy, ranked just above Venezuela.  Somehow Noah Smith didn’t read that far.

Bloomberg’s, Smith, cites the fact that they have GDP growth… and makes the claim that illiteracy has been eradicated.  Unemployment is made up of unskilled laborers, and skilled workers are in high shortage.  Corruption is rampant, a dictatorial rule is leveraged, while only 40% of the youth population continue school after the 4thgrade, and 20% enter secondary school, UNESCO has declared the country to be wholly literate.   In case you are math challenged, UNESCO warns that the rate can not be higher than 100%…   Unlike Florida which typically allows upwards of 140% of the population to vote.   I digress.

In terms of World Ranking – Bolivia is followed by Zimbabwe.

Not exactly a stellar record to use in support of Socialism.

The splintering and demise of the Republican and Democrat Parties is parlayed.

While Noah Smith argues that Socialism didn’t destroy Venezuela, hyperinflation did, he rather bizarrely refuses to acknowledge what caused ‘hyperinflation’.   It is humorous to note that Venezuela is referred to as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela – it followed the exact same ideologies and principles as Morales does now in Bolivia.  The Bolivarian Revolution in 1999 ushered in Chavez as the savior of the Republic.  He vied for ‘socialism or death’.   Chavez government was called the Bolivarian government.  He created a new Constitution – as did Morales.  They support social welfare, social property, communes, universal healthcare, and of course, redistribution of wealth.

The only difference between Bolivia and Venezuela is that Chavez introduced Socialist policies beginning in 1999, Morales took office in 2006, Bolivia simply hasn’t reached the same crescendo – yet.

While the Soviet Union took decades to rise from the ashes of it’s socialist/communist rule instituted by the Bolsheviks, Venezuela and Bolivia don’t have the machismo or brute intellect to know how to recreate failing economics despite being rich in natural resources.  Reading of the demise of Venezuela, it reads as a static version of Bolivia’s current crisis and stagnation – crime rates soaring, riots, protests, inability to redirect industry from oil, vast resources left untapped, education crisis, etc…

Despite Noah Smith attempting to frame Socialism as simply mishandled, he has shown that his own understanding is rather pathetic.    But what he isn’t noticing is the fact that while both ruling parties in the US are crumbling, fracturing, and called out as failures (thank you Romney), the evolution of Socialism historically appears as a saving solution only to completely destroy the country so relegated – from within.

The EU is only now waking up to their own demise promulgated by the Socialist/Communist regimes of Merkel, Macron, and May.  Sweden is Falling faster than the Twin Towers, and Norway is a close second.   But then, that is the plan…

We The People, have that authority.  It is a choice.