Harrison Ford: My Charity Is Better Than Yours!

There are literally thousands if not hundreds of thousands of charities across the globe.  The causes are infinite, and if everyone supported the same causes, the few would survive to the many falling away.  Such is the statement declared by Harrison Ford who has announced that  his charities are more worthy than everyone else’s because his are better, more right, and more more…   If you don’t support ‘his charities’ then you are a bastion to be beaten and whipped and pummeled if not by force, then by words as he did today to our government, in particular – Trump.

There is nothing wrong with supporting the environment and environmental causes.  But there is also nothing wrong in choosing to support veterans, the church, animal rights, or a host of alternate ‘charitable causes’. No one can say their cause is better than someone else’s.  And yet – they do.

I remember my ex-husband bashing my support of animal rights when he felt there were causes more important! The entire point of charity is to help steward people, the earth and all the creatures that God gave us – the animals.

No one chose to demonize Harrison Ford for his philanthropy, or his choice, however, he has chosen to demonize those who do not follow his particular venue of choice – and that is what defines the wrong of Liberal thinking today.  “If you do not do what I do, you deserve to be punished.”  It is the Hollywood narcissistic agenda.

To the best of my knowledge, no one has bashed Harrison Ford’s choice to support the environment, his choice to dedicate himself to his cause!  So it follows as rather odd, rather arrogant that he has made the unfortunate choice to bash all those who do not agree with his venue, and the venue of those scientists who espouse ‘man-made climate change’ as the force.   Because there is an equal and opposite force that – disagrees.

No one challenges Ford. He is passionate and that is commendable.  But shouldn’t he be likewise passionate about the charitable causes of others?  Charity is charity.  Right?  Or has even charity become a target for abuse and ridicule?

While I am passionate about the environment, I don’t subscribe to the notion that it is all man’s fault, nor do I think that anyone, any charity, is doing enough including stopping deforestation.   And that is hardly the fault of all us Trumpers.  And religious folks.  In fact, let’s take a look at who is doing the deforestation…

Recently, it was revealed that Harvard Law School supported such causes.  Hmmm, imagine that!

“The largest deforestation products are cattle, palm oil, soy, and timber. If you think about a hamburger, there’s palm oil in the bun, beef in the patty, and soy used for animal feed. The box it comes in was once part of a tree. ”Even in one product or one meal you’ve got multiple commodities, and each one of those will have had a very vast and global, complex supply chain.”

So every time you buy a beef meal from a fast food chain, you are contributing to deforestation.  I wonder how many fast food burgers Harrison has consumed in his lifetime?

Obviously, it is a complicated issue.   But blaming someone is absurd, blaming a group without proper research, is a nuclear bomb.   Be careful.

There are a number of organizations that have recently formed with the agenda of ‘stopping deforestation’, but their agenda is more aligned with public relations than actual actionable efforts.  The classic verbiage is ‘research’ we are going to spend billions researching the cause of deforestation so that by the time our research is complete there won’t be a forest left…to argue about.

Ford took his agenda to a frontal attack ‘stage’ when he claimed that ‘anti-scientist’ people are the root of the problem and need to be eliminated from public office.  Really?   Perhaps Ford could use a lesson in diversity?  Or tolerance?  Or inclusion? Or in research?  Or in science…  Because the scientific community is at odds.  And because the Liberal world seeks to point a finger in a direction that should reflect back on self.   His rant went further.  Instead of advocating for his passion and cause, he sought to demonize all people who are not on his agenda.   And that’s where he lost.

It is a sad world.  No one is allowed a thought that does not align with the liberal thought.  Censorship of thinking is thus.  And Hollywood seems to feel their ‘stage presence’ gives them the right to demonize and denounce and bash and whiplash with a fury derived from maniacal emotions.

The Paris Accord is a joke. It has ‘DONE’ nothing.  It is a name.  It is an agenda.  It represents the same baseless disappearance of billions of dollars on salaries and travel, that has people over the globe incensed.   They continue to spout ‘Plans’ to be instituted in 30 years – useless words.   Why would that cost $100 billion per year?  Can anyone actually account for the money already donated and spent and conclude that the money changed anything, cured anything?  It is a media hype and nothing more.

In the midst of the mix is the fact that Harrison Ford and his wife have cultivated a relationship with Bill Clinton and Hillary whose lavish lifestyle hardly fits the environmental dictum of ‘saving the land’.   So it becomes a modicum of hypocrisy amid a few sighs and slumped heads as we look at where the truth is told…  and Ford’s entire argument and passion are now questioned given that hypocrisy.

And so, as the drum beats, we take less inspiration from Harrison Ford’s truth, and more inspiration from the fact that he is simply promoting a Clinton agenda. The environment looses.  Ford Looses.  And the Agenda takes another hit.

Harrison Ford – Hush.  You are not the god of charity.   There are infinite causes that each of us pursue, all within the same realm of helping steward.

Hurricanes – A Seasonal Agenda

The WORST Hurricanes in history!  A product of Trump-mania.  But it would appear a bit of simple research would defy the logic quite quickly and succinctly.

Of the 30 worst hurricanes in American history registered between 1851 and 2006, 26 of them occurred more than fifty years ago.  That would be ‘before Trump’ for the mathematically challenged.   Two of the most recent that have been catastrophic include Katrina in 2005 which was actually a Category 3 when it made landfall, and Harvey in 2017 which was also a Category 3 at landfall.  The reason Katrina became significant was not because of the hurricane itself so much as the fact that the dam was compromised and ultimately broke.

Hurricanes have been a part of our history.  They follow a somewhat consistent cycle, most often affect the same locations, and are always incredibly expensive.  Except for one region that bears an interesting history.

Hurricane archives track according to:  Eastern Pacific, Western Pacific, Indian Ocean and North Atlantic.  The US is the North Atlantic region.

The Indian Ocean:  their storms are referred to as cyclones.  Hurricanes were not even registered or recorded at all until 1961 when they suddenly spiked and ended in 2008.  There have been -0- each year since.

Western Pacific:   their storms are referred to as typhoons.  Prior to 1949, they had no register/record of hurricanes, since that time they register more per year than any other region averaging upwards of 22 annually.

Eastern Pacific:  prior to 1949, they registered/recorded no hurricanes.  Between 2009 and 2017 they registered 71 hurricanes.

North Atlantic:  has consistently registered hurricanes since the tracking began in 1851 with spikes of 10 to 11 per year every 20 years on average. Peak years were 1870, 1885, 1893, 1915, 1935, 1950, 1970, 1995, and 2005.

While scientists confer on the way a hurricane is formed, consensus ends there as the global warmers vs the natural evolutionists have radically different views.  What NOAA charts do reveal is that the Cyclone/Hurricane season has peaked in September for the last 100 years.  And the intensity has not spiked.  By landfall, Florence diluted to a Category 1 despite all the ‘computer models’ claiming it would strike as a Category 4.

Hurricanes, tropical storms, cyclones are all an apparatus of nature that are powerful forces. Mitigating the inevitable would have a lot more logic than blaming – a person.  I suppose Obama was the cause of the 71 hurricanes during his tenure…?

Given that each and every year we are subjected to a ‘season of hurricanes’, and each and every year for the last 100 years that surge peaks in September, it is a rather bizarre media story to attempt to blame that activity on anyone or anything in particular…

Europe’s Fires = ARSON Or Climate Change?

Europe is under fire. Droughts have ravaged their agriculture. Heat waves have been intolerable. Satellite images show the entire landscape to be browned and dead.  From Denmark to Germany to France to Latvia, to Sweden…, the destructive weather has wreaked massive tolls.   The media continues to bolster the Climate Change phenomena as the causal factor, but in fact, it would appear that most fires could possibly be arson.  Most have occurred across numerous regions simultaneously.  And statistically, natural causes, or climate causes, account for a very small fraction, if any.

So what happened? Why?  And how will that affect Europe, trade and trade partners?

In Greece scores of what are termed ‘freak’ fires have left Greece in mourning as over 80 people have been reported dead, hundreds injured and entire neighborhoods in ashes.   The government has stated the fires were set deliberately. Three separate points were set on fire surrounding Athens in deadly blazes.

In Germany fires have broken out in forests, apartment buildings, refugee centers, a train station, a theme park, and all seem to point to arson.

Sweden saw 80 massive fires rip through in one week.  The media claims it is a result of the drought.  But a drought doesn’t ‘cause’ a fire, it provides fuel.  Typically, a person must set the blaze in order for the fuel to burn.   And like the California blazes, wind is a fireman’s worst enemy.    But to say that Climate Change actually ‘caused’ the fires is short-sighted.  It is no different than a gun being blamed for killing someone.  It isn’t the gun – it is the person holding the gun.

In the Netherlands, twelve bridges have been closed because the excessive heat has caused the metal to expand and thus make the bridges structural sustainability unsound.

Denmark is asking for $137million in aid to help devastated farmers.

Arson is huge! And All of Europe is on FIRE.

More than 500,000 wildfires are set by arsonists each year in the US alone!   Rarely is the arsonist discovered.  Often if he/she is discovered, prosecution fails as proving intentional arson vs stupid person arson is a difficult legal task.   When it is proven, sentencing varies by state and by destruction, with the most aggregious involving a death sentence if people die as a result of the fire.  In Oregon, a 15 year old was fined $36 million for arson… and told to submit a pay schedule if he couldn’t pay in full immediately…  Oregon is not known for its logic and rationale.

Today, protestors use arson liberally in their pursuit of chaos.  Liberal cities tend to have the highest accounts of protest arson including Berkeley, Baltimore, and most recently, in Portland when ‘anti-fascists fought anti-anti-fascists’ and anti everyone fought police.

So could the raging fires occurring across Europe be coordinated?

March 25ththere was a very disturbing fire in a Russian Mall in which exit doors seemed to be purposefully locked so that patrons could not escape, and alarms were shut off.  Of the 71 dead, 41 were children.   Was the fire a hit?  Was it a warning message?  To date there has been no conclusion.

News outlets are instructed what to report.  A war behind the scenes is quite possible given the disruption of the cabal’s inner workings.  With oil attacks in the Middle East going unreported in favor of articles highlighting the dress ensemble of Prince Henry, the world of journalism has truly died under a combustible fuel fired flame.

Could the fires plaguing Europe be coordinated acts of terrorism?   Theories abounded throughout the US over the last decade regarding numerous arson fires that devastated hundreds of thousands of acres each.  Blogs discussed the possibility of terrorism.  The media was silent.   The cause, the arsonist, never revealed.

Recently, the US announced expansive sanctions against EU corporations if they were engaged in conducting business with Iran.   Iran was angry with the EU for not coercing Trump to accept the Iran Nuclear Deal as is.  Israel is once again inflamed with Hamas.  The Saudis have decidedly snubbed Canada while continuing to relentlessly bomb Yemen.  And the EU is literally – on fire.

But little of this is found on MSM headlines.  There are various cores at play:   Ethnic cleansing in the Middle East, but more importantly, the Protocols of the Cabal in their century long pursuit of Control thru Chaos.  Ethnic cleansing for them simply means a lesser body to deal with when the forum is finally structured.

So why engulf the EU in flames?  What would be the message in the EU fires?

Given that fire devastates structure, destroys agriculture, and wreaks havoc on the economy, it is interesting that Germany recently unveiled tariffs on US agriculture.   In a war of ‘tit-for-tat’, if the July California wildfires were set to decimate US agriculture, and throw a wrench into Trump’s trade tariff win, the July EU fires may have been set in retaliation?

Truly, a political war outside of mainstream has been waged and set in motion for decades.  Read media headlines any more and they have nothing to say, nowhere to go, and routinely ramp up dialogue of mundane events that no one cares about.   But it is quite plausible backdoor wars are the real mainstream.   And the EU fires, the California fires, are not a mere coincidence. 

California Wildfires! Governor Brown Blames Trump

Trump Derangement Syndrome: a disease that medical experts claim is associated with paranoia, acute hysteria, and the inability to tolerate policy differences.  I wonder if Obamacare will pay for it?  Apparently, Governor Jerry Brown has jumped on the bandwagon claiming that his non-action in preventing California wildfires is really all Trump’s fault because Trump changed the climate. 

In 2017, over 9,000 fires burned 2.1 million acres, 43 people were killed, the cost was $13 billion, and 11,000 homes were destroyed.  So what did Governor Brown Do?

If Governor Brown was truly of the mind that climate change is causing extensive fires in California, knowing that California experiences thousands of fires each and every year, what exactly has he done to mitigate those occurrences?   Because it would seem that his methodology is to:   a.  blame Trump, and b.  ask for money.

“Forest thinning and prescribed burns — both of which aim to eliminate fire fuel before the fire occurs”  are the best method for prevention according to Mark Cochrane, a senior scientist at the Geospatial Sciences Center of Excellence at South Dakota State University.

Colorado and Oregon both have in place very specific and comprehensive strategies for mitigating against fires occurring as well as response efforts.  The vast majority of fires are ‘human caused’, either accidentally or arson.   Rapid response in these instances is essential.  That requires boots on the ground.  California has 885 fire stations.  Only 25% of California firefighters are ‘career’, nearly 60% are volunteer or mostly volunteer.   Despite the rabid extent of fires in California each year, they rely predominantly on volunteers and out of state assistance!  When all is said and done, the cost is not picked up by the state, but by Federal taxpayers.

Droughts in California have occurred throughout history, they are a continuum that dates back centuries, and despite a doubling of population since 1979, not one new large-scale water project has been built!  Hollywood?  Where is you outrage?  Where are your concerts to raise money?  Where are your donations?

“Because much of California’s water network relies on a system of pumps to move water from north to south, large volumes of water are often lost to the Pacific Ocean during winter storms when river flow exceeds the capacity of the pumps. This is further complicated by environmental rules which restrict pumping during certain months of the year, to protect migrating fish. In water year 2015, 9,400,000 acre feet (11.6 km3) of water flowed through the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, but only 1,900,000 acre feet (2.3 km3) were recovered into water distribution systems.

The state’s reservoirs have insufficient capacity to balance the water supply between wet and dry years.”

It would appear that neither Governor Brown or the states spokesperson for Fire Protection are aware of the above facts which is rather frightening given they are in charge of mitigation as a result of fires.

The latest spat between Brown and Trump was over the available water to fight the fires. Oddly, despite California’s ongoing battle with droughts, water rationing, and lacking capacity reservoirs, both Governor Brown and Briana Sacks, a spokesperson for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, claim there is ‘plenty of water’ citing Clear Lake.

Clear Lake rights are owned by Yolo County and are used for agriculture, local water companies and recreational use.  In 2014, it recorded one of its lowest levels of water after severe droughts at -.31 Ramsey.  It is heavily contaminated with high levels of Mercury and thus warnings are issued with respect to eating some of the fish.

But water rights have become the core issue for multiple lawsuits as the state of California began to declare a sort of eminent domain over county rights in 2015.  The state was attempting to curtail rights that had been on the books for a hundred years due to mounting drought problems so as to divert for state purposes rather than county or agriculture purposes.  Odd that Brown and Briana were not aware of this…

Therefore, when Brown and Briana Sacks cited Clear Lake as proof positive that California has plenty of water, their lack of knowledge was rather astounding.   The last drought period in California lasted from 2012 through 2017.

The ultimate point that both Brown and Briana seem to be missing is the fact that California wildfires are NOT mitigated, nothing has been done to prevent them, and nothing has been done to ramp up fighting the fires before they get out of control.  Nothing has been done to secure more career firefighters.  Nothing.  By continuing to do nothing, California will continue to burn.  By not providing adequate reservoirs for the population and it’s needs, California will continue to be plagued by substantial periods of severe drought resulting in depleted water sources to extinguish fires.  Pretending that the entire problem is Trump – is truly a deranged mentality. Ultimately it shows gross negligence and mismanagement… on the part of Governor Brown and his Departments.

The current Mendocino fire is the largest in history approaching 300,000 acres and just 30% contained.

Weather Manipulation: An Opioid Epidemic

In 1976, the UN created a treaty within which 78 countries agreed not to participate in the use of weather modification for hostile or military engagements which would have “widespread, long-lasting, or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other party state”.   States that are NOT party to the agreement would thus be susceptible to whatever military strikes and destruction party states deem necessary.

The parties that did not sign this agreement or signed but failed to ratify, include:  France, Mexico, Croatia, Portugal, Lebanon, Turkey, Bolivia, Holy See, Iceland, Iraq, Liberia, Luxembourg, Morocco, Syria, Uganda, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, Columbia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Guyana, Thailand, Cambodia, Iran, Haiti, Dominican republic, Bosnia, Montenegro, Myanmar, Laos, Nepal, and ‘most’ of Africa.

What the treaty acknowledged was the fact that weather modification was in existence, had been for some time, and as a result of its scientific breakthroughs, required ‘management’.  The Treaty states that the agreement against hostile use shall not ‘hinder’ the continued use of ‘environmental modification techniques’.

In addition the wording could be legally construed to allow for the use with debates over what constituted; 1.  Widespread, 2.  Long-lasting, and 3.  Severe.

Today, modification is referred to as ‘geoengineering’ and refers to solar radiation management (SRM) and global climate engineering.  Which came first – the chicken or the egg?  In the Geoengineering mantra, it is now unclear if global warming/climate change is a result of natural causes, man causes, or geoengineering manipulation.  Given that the tests have been ongoing for over 70 years, the trial and error factor is not unlike the nuclear tests of the 1950’s.  Let’s wait and see what happens when we nuke our military personnel…  My father was a victim.

Such is the ‘science of weather manipulation’.

Despite denying it existed, the 1976 UN document brings an obvious truth to what was termed a conspiracy theory for decades.  Given that we know that truth is in short supply within these various arenas, it would not be out of the ordinary to  assume that the evolution of weather modification has progressed most infinitely and is in fact utilized quite readily for peaceful purposes, and for management of nations that we feel need to be punished.   Albeit, in a way that might not be construed as ‘long-lasting’ – which has no legal definition.  Therefore, the punishment might be temporal, flooding that will subside, or a heat wave that makes life uncomfortable, except that we are now finding that even the most temporal change has cumulative and domino effects.  

But if no one admits it, if no one party states that they are engaging, the media will continue to claim it is all man-made and we simply need to reduce our ‘carbon footprint’, our gas consumption, our aerosol use, our…

One of the methods of achieving SRM is to inject billions of particles of sulfer dioxide into the stratosphere in order to deflect sunlight and send it back out toward the sun.  It is believed that this technique would cause widespread and localized droughts in either Africa or South America.  This particular methodology is currently inherently funded by Bill Gates and Harvard – the same Harvard and Bill Gates that advocate for massive de- population.

Coincidence?

Much of the initiative is defined as “Experiments” which are conducted in our atmosphere as a hit and miss, maybe, theory that we need to act on in order to determine if it works – and if it doesn’t then we have – consequences.  Like Global Warming and Chaotic Weather Patterns.

Apparently, as a result of these manipulations, scientists warn that stopping the manipulation is like a heroin addict going cold turkey, the likely reaction of the atmosphere would be catastrophic as it went into convulsions and withdrawal.

The problem is there is no corresponding methodone fix!

“If geoengineering were halted all at once, there would be rapid temperature and precipitation increases at 5–10 times the rates from gradual global warming.”x This means that stopping SAI once it had started could be more dangerous than starting it in the first place. Ozone depletion is another important side effect of SAI.

Furthermore, once SRM is deployed, sudden interruption would cause a termination effect, raising temperatures rapidly, creating a situation worse than it was before its deployment. Therefore, SRM will create dependency and captive markets.”

In other words, we created a monster akin to ISIS.  We can’t terminate what was started decades ago because it would send our environment into a cataclysmic state of chaos, so we are stuck.  It is liking weaning off opioids.

Weather Manipulation is an addiction.  So while the scientists that ‘experimented’ us to this place desperately try and claim that it is all man-made and a carbon footprint, the reality is that this same science is actually most likely the base cause of the chaotic eclipse that has morphed into a nanospeed decay of planet earth.

How the particles are injected is the source of argument and conspiracies, instead of the fact that they are injected.   And so, the truth is mushed into a legal advertising morph or play on words.  But the truly sad reality is the fact that we are now addicted to a scientific shitakestorm that began as an ‘experiment’.

There are those who claim that aluminum is one of the stratosphere ingredients in the nanoparticle experiment.

What does aluminum do to our body?
Aluminum is linked to blood disorders, such as hemolysis, leukocytosis and porphyria, as well as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS.  In addition, exposure to this unwanted substance can cause an increase in cavities, as it interferes with bone calcification and competes with fluoride.   Aluminum exposure causes brain oxidation and inflammation – while increasing amounts of the beta-amyloid proteins linked with Alzheimer’s disease aluminum exposure causes brain oxidation and inflammation – while increasing amounts of the beta-amyloid proteins linked with Alzheimer’s disease.

What you CAN DO:  Eat Cilantro by the fresh bunch, crave anti-oxidants, turmeric, purified water, sea salt, avoid processed foods, high doses of vitamin C, garlic and onion. 

So many of us opt to avoid all the vaccines which are rich in aluminum, but if our atmosphere is deluged, it becomes even more of a dominant agenda…

FYI: Don’t forget if they are actively injecting trillions of particle into our atmosphere that means our rain water, our ponds – are the highest concentrate.  Sorry.  Also realize that this means that Trump can not simply alter this course given that the proposed reaction would be severe withdrawals far worse than the current weather chaos we experience today…

Africa Land Grabs and Agenda 2030 – A UN Ponzi Scheme

The UN is attempting to fund the African Land Grabs through the implementation of Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2063 utilizing public, government and private money that they call ‘wealth redistribution’ or simply ‘sharing’.  

While Nero watched – The Roman Empire Burned…  And while we have been diverted by media silliness, Africa has been bought and sold to the highest bidders and is now the target of multi-national corporations as they seek to reap her rewards through a series of UN Agendas.

And the new micro-lending platform is – crypto currency!  Which explains why suddenly Soros has done a complete about face and started investing in this voodoo money.  But he isn’t alone by any means.  FinComEco, a British firm employing former Ministers and Bankers has been accumulating crypto loans.  American International Agriculture Group is busily setting up shop in Algeria.  GMEX Group, Blockchain Commodities, Chinese companies, all see the potential ravaging to be gained.

Within their chain of companies they provide genetically engineered seeds, and genetically enhanced animals which they sell to the impoverished farmers that have been displaced by the Land Grabs with money generated by the UN in its programs to end poverty and ‘share the wealth’ while creating lending bubbles and high interest rates of return – temporarily – until the swap bubble bursts.  WHEW!

The first Africa Agenda was introduced in 1992 under the surname, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.  It generated a lot of attention, but failed to do anything despite its grandioso plugging. The UN simultaneously created the Kyoto Protocol after the Montreal Protocol was a valueless failure in 1987.

The Montreal Protocol was supposed to protect the ozone layer.  After a bunch of countries signed on, it was considered a huge success!  The Kyoto Protocol was created in 2005 to fight Global Warming through the reduction of greenhouse emissions.  The US never ratified this agreement and Canada, Russia, Japan and New Zealand withdrew in 2012.  The UN is busily making Agendas and Protocols, but the agenda would seem to be to further their agenda…more than anything else.

What these nice squeaky Protocols did create was a market derivative scheme called “Emissions Trading”.  Permit credits to pollute are sold and traded like a commodity.   The largest program is the European Union Emission Trading Scheme.  They even have a spot market where they can buy futures and options internationally.   California has it own such trading market, as does the US, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the UK.

Follow the Money.

Therefore, we can assume that these UN Agendas will create pockets of trading wealth as well for masses of large corporations.  With the land grabs effectively concluded in Africa, the next agenda was to get government money to fund the infrastructure for the corporate agriculture tracts. Climate Change, the Paris Agreement was supposed to fill that void of funding need, but seemed to fall on its face.  Hence the UN needed to create Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2063 for the purpose of creating heartfelt needs to end ‘poverty’ in Africa through wealth ‘sharing’.

Who has signed on to these Agendas?  The UN and African Union leaders.   The African Union Leaders just recently unveiled their brand new headquarters in Ethiopia that cost $200 million and was built by and gifted by – China.  Although record keeping of land leases in Africa are scarce, it is estimated that China now holds as much as 100 million hectares of agriculture land.

Of course the African Leaders don’t mind China taking over their country at all because a good portion, if not all the money is pocketed and transferred to offshore accounts like the Panama Paper Caper.

Land Grabs have also been concluded in South America where Soros and Gates purchased large swathes for production purposes.

Owning the world’s food and water supply is a heady agenda.  Using the UN to grab money from governments, aka taxpayers, to fund their products that they will later sell at a premium to the taxpayers that funded them – is even headier.  I’m sure they are laughing all the way to the bank…

Ozone Hole is Shrinking? Because…

The Ozone Hole is shrinking – according to Scientific reports released in 2016! In fact, it appears that the main reason it is shrinking is because of the natural global temperature changes, ie, warmer temperatures in the polar regions cause the hole to shrink and rising temperatures in the stratosphere also play a significant role. This would indicate that over thousands of years as the earth’s temperatures rise and cool, holes develop and disappear as a common reaction. According to NASA.

Of course, the MSM would liken the decrease to the Montreal Protocol which called for the decreased use of CFC gases such as those coming from spray bottles…   However, there is absolutely no evidence to support this theory, instead scientists are pointing to the natural occurrences of global weather shifts as the most significant contributing factor.

According to ‘climate predictions’, the hole was slated to return to its 1980’s size sometime between 2050 and 2070.   However, as of 2017 it is already its 1988 size, once again proving that science is at best – a theory.   The Montreal Protocol which was signed in 1987 and initiated in 1989, was only sporadically implemented across the globe, had multiple phase out time frames, and did not include HCFC’s until 2015 when the Ozone Hole had already dwarfed in size.   In addition, not all countries banned the use of CFC’s; China, India and South Korea still proliferate their use.

Du Pont began producing hydrofluorocarbons as an alternative to the phasing out of CFC’s. However, it was later discovered that these HFC’s contribute to Global Warming and they became the target of the Kyoto Protocol which sought to ban their use worldwide  Unfortunately, they had already become mass produced and were a market source around the globe. So, a lean period was initiated in which phase outs were established to be in full force as of 2020 for developed countries and 2030 for developing countries…

But the phaseout hasn’t happened. In fact, the largest producers include; Coca-Cola, DuPont, Honeywell, ThermoKing and Carrier Transicold. Problem? Of course, the alternatives that have been put in service to phaseout the HFC’s are also now considered unsafe… But they haven’t been banned because there really isn’t an alternative that has been created that is considered ‘safe’ although everything is delisted via a Climate Protocol so as to create a phaseout sometime in the future – maybe in 3 or 4 decades… but in the meantime we’ve already discovered that the natural variation in climate is fixing the problem without Scientists involvement.

Gee Whilakers!  Bottom line?

We have replaced the CFC’s that were thought to have ‘caused’ the Ozone Hole with a number of alternate compounds including HFC’s and HCFC’s and R’s and Q’s galore, only to discover that all the alternates are also causing Global Warming and the depletion of the Ozone layer, only to find that everything is super-naturally fixing itself – anyway!

Whew!

I’m sure glad Science fixed all those problems for us!   Cause I sure don’t know w hat we would do otherwise…

 

In the meantime, not to be left out of the loop of god status, the EPA announced in 2015 that they were going to call for a phaseout of all HFC’s as a part of Obama’s Climate Change Plan of Action. I guess they didn’t get the memo that the Ozone Hole was already fixing itself.   In the meantime, a report issued by the UN in 2016 stated that HFC use in ALL countries across the globe is expected to rise significantly over the coming decades averaging about 16% per country.

 

I guess NO ONE got the memo. But hey, the Ozone Hole continues to contract. FYI: the UN has an Ozone branch whose purpose is to study Ozone and to ask pretty please will everyone voluntarily reduce useage…

De Blasio Suing Oil Companies For Climate Change Amidst Budget Deficit

De Blasio is boldly going where no man has gone before – filing a lawsuit against multiple worldwide oil and gas companies for their role in Hurricane Sandy’s devastation, health issues, and infrastructure destruction to his great New York City… Oh, but wait, he isn’t just suing the oil companies, he is targeting NYC pension funds in an effort to ‘divest’ their investment in fossil fuels and divert it to Climate Change issues.   What?

BP, Conoco, Exxon, Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell are the major targets. Proving that they directly impacted climate change and caused harm to NYC specifically, is a rather uphill battle. But apparently one De Blasio and Company feel is possible and just might mitigate his ever defeated budget deficit.

According to the Budget Comptroller for NY, NYC is facing a deficit of as much as $7 billion as of March this year. According to the analysis, NYC could be facing a disaster scenario under the tutelage of De Blasio and he’s running scared with nowhere to turn to find the $$$$$.   In addition, Trump’s new tax plan could cause a massive exodus as taxpayers seek more friendly places to park their money given the limitations on interest deductions will impact their itemized deduction caps.  With some of the highest priced real estate in the country, mortgages are a mainstay. But the rationale was the deductibility of the interest.  No more.

As a result, De Blasio is scrambling and this is the best scenario he could come up with while attempting to capitalize on an issue that is embedded in the Liberal agenda – Climate Change.

De Blasio’s threat to redirect NYC pension fund investments is a bit of a smokescreen given the fund has been in a massive overhaul for the past 3 ½ years when Scott Stringer took office and declared that the retirement system was “hanging by a thread”. At issue was the fact that the returns delivered by the fund were considered inadequate and well below the market.   Implementing a comprehensive plan that Stringer estimated would take 5-10 years to become a powerhouse once again, cannot simply be ‘modified’ to coddle the whims of De Blasio. Fiduciary responsibilities dictate.

Two NGO’s are supporting the De Blasio move, Union of Concerned Scientists, which is the recipient of funding from George Soros, and 350.org, which is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation and has partnered with Global Greengrants Fund, a Soros Open Society promotion. In fact, according to their Form 990, the only grant made by 350.org was to Global Greengrants Fund.

 

Climatic Change, a journal established by Michael Oppenheimer and Gary Yohe, published a study claiming that climate damages such as rising sea levels and increased temperatures are a direct result of products sold by such companies as Chevron and ExxonMobil. In addition, the Union For Concerned Scientists (Soros funded) has joined in the fray of qualifying finger pointing by claiming that:   “We’ve known for a long time that fossil fuels are the largest contributor to climate change. What’s new here is that we’ve determined just how much specific companies’ products have caused the earth to warm and the seas to rise.”

The study suggests that all the major oil companies combined contributed to 10% of the global temperature increase between 1980 and 2010 and 4% of the rise in sea level.   The study specifically provides Hurricane Sandy as an example of rising sea levels magnified by climate change causing roughly $2 billion in damage over what would have occurred had there been no rise in sea levels.  The total estimated cost was $65 billion.  How they can make monetary determinations is a bit stretched…and seems to have no supporting documentation.

So, who commissioned this report?

The lead author of the report was Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate science director at the Union for Concerned Scientists. Coincidentally, Gary Yohe, who assisted in this publication, is also a Member of the NYC Panel on Climate Change. Somewhat a conflict of interest?

Further conflicts include the fact that Michael Oppenheimer also founded, Climate Action Network which is aligned with Soros Fund Management and Christine Lagarde, of France’s Economic Ministry.

So why would Soros want to hit the wallets of oil and gas executives?   Hitting the biggest oil giants, might give a boost to some of the smaller companies, like:  Petroleo Brasilerosa, California Resources, Valvoline, Rice Energy, Targa Resources and Diamondback all of which were owned in Soros portfolio last year.  Of course the hypocrisy doesn’t end there with Soros heavily invested in the Williams Pipeline company, and Columbia Pipeline which merged with Transamerica of the Keystone XL fame…   Creating a profit while belying ethics is the Soros windfall.

Other cities and counties suing the oil giants include California’s Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Oakland and Imperial Beach.   All these cities and counties project a continued significant budget deficit now and in the coming years… and tapping climate change might fill the gap…

By the time any legal action is concluded, Soros will be well out of the oil and gas investments – an easy bet.  Playing both sides, not unlike his play of Republicans and Democrats.  “Anyone, Anyone”…

The Green Climate Fund – A Soros Child

A funny thing happened on the way to the Forum, everyone cheered, but no one Changed… Germany has declared that it will not meet it’s Climate Change goals for 2020, China says it’s emissions will continue to rise through 2030, and France is mum, as in maybe no one in Paris will notice they have actually done – nothing. Six countries in the EU boast that they have met their goals as stipulated by the EU Commission; Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal and Romania. YEAH! Except they already complied as of 2014, because their goals were minimal and the economic crisis required ‘belt tightening’, so technically in order to meet goals they had to do – nothing.

So, despite the humbra of toxic words, toxic air hovers large and in charge.

Apparently, The Green Climate Fund is the body tasked with collecting and disbursing pledged funds from countries across the globe.   A quick overview: Japan has disbursed roughly 50% of pledges, Germany a third, The Netherlands a third, France roughly half, China -0-, UK about 2/3, and US 1/3, India -0-, and South America -0.

Of the $10 billion collected by The Green Climate Fund, roughly $45 million was spent on Administrative Expenses in 2017, and $35 million in 2016. Apparently, these hard working Board Members work on average – 10 days per month.   According to the 990 Tax Return dated 2014, it would appear that they raised about $88 million paid some salaries and operating costs and banked the balance. In 2017 they needed to create a investment fund management IT system to handle all the cash… Poor Babies.

Their latest project includes solving the Ethiopian drought problem thru an investment of $45 million to be developed over a five year period.   So far, they haven’t actually ‘done’ anything except draft a proposal – funding = $0.   They have pledged $38.5 million toward Columbia in order to improve the ecosystem.   This too is a proposal for which no actual work has been done and no money disbursed.   They have pledged $57 million to Argentina in the form of a “Loan”, $0 actually disbursed. There is an outstanding pledge grant of $31.4 million to Egypt for infrastructure rebuilding, nothing disbursed. A grant of $26.9 million to Nauru, the world’s smallest island, for the purpose of developing a climate resistant port. No dollars disbursed.

In fact, it would appear that the funds are primarily targeting ‘infrastructure and water shortages’. Both of these issues are certainly important, they just aren’t about changing the global warming trend that the fund stipulates to be their purpose.  So why are they funding these projects?

Who are the recipients? Namibia, Morocco, Senegal, Maldives, Ecuador, Mali, Gambia, Tualu, Armenia, Vietnam, El Salvador, Fiji, Peru, etc…

A Few Examples:

Malawi: USAID has been working with the government of Malawi for years to help mitigate agricultural shifts and provide drought security. USAID budget request for 2018 was $15.4 billion. So why is the Green Fund duplicating USAID?

Maldives: They have been battling a losing battle as the sea’s rise and the islands are swamped. Their 2008 government plant to abandon ship and relocate was dismissed and a $10 billion contract with the Saudi’s was initiated whereby they would secure their shipping route safety and develop the islands for tourism relocating thousands of local people. So is The Green Fund actually collaborating with the Saudi’s?

Ecuador:   Ecuador has been raising it’s fist to resolve water issues for years. The government has made some radical changes, particularly in energy investment and diversity. Partnering with the European Commission thru EUROCLIMA, they have spent $4.2 billion on energy projects.   They are currently funded by the REDD+ Program within the UN. So why is The Green Fund duplicating funding projects?

It would appear, that The Green Fund is simply a duplicate board tasked with billions of dollars in funding whose purpose may very well be to create a slush fund to give the appearance of battling Climate Change, aka, Global Warming, when in fact it is sustaining the infrastructure, agriculture and energy growth of third world countries. To what ultimate goal?  

Given it’s purported goal is to raise $100 billion per year, it should be noted that it’s Board of Directors is predominantly comprised of Arabs, Africans, and various representatives from the Netherlands, many of whom seem to be devoid of a background, with the exception of the Globalist, Leonardo Martinez-Diaz. He has written extensively on globalizing emerging and developing countries in order to create a Global Order. He is a Global Director at Sustainable Finance Center at the World Resources Institute.

World Resources Institute partners with the George Soros – Open Society Foundations.

And there you have it: The Green Climate Fund, which is demanding contributions in the range of $100 billion annually, is utilizing those funds to create a global network of developing countries so as to ultimately incorporate their governments into a unified One World Order. Climate Change/Global Warming are simply tag phrases to sucker the funds for – The Greater Good of the Order of George Soros.

Weather Modification – The God Particle

With Hurricane Harvey behind us, Hurricane Irma barreling down on us, and apparently two more offshore waiting in line, what isn’t being reported are the 81 large raging fires across the US, burning 1.4 million acres to date. Of the 81 fires, 58 are still ‘uncontrolled’.  And the US weather extremes are a global phenomena.

Without any warning from the ‘media’, in Colorado we woke up Monday to what was called ‘light smoke’. That meant you had a visibility of about a mile, your eyes burned, your throat was rough, scratchy and dry, and everything smelled like fire. Being outdoors for more than 15 minutes was said to be dangerous to your health.   Twelve other states were experiencing ‘heavy smoke’ that was considered hazardous.

But absolutely nothing in the mainstream media?

The smoke from the fires in the northwest was so pervasive they were experiencing it in North Carolina.  Not a word.

Washington has declared a state of emergency, the fires are threatening Glacier National Park and Yosemite, and there are numerous evacuations in both Oregon and Washington.  Not a word.

San Francisco was experiencing temperatures over one hundred, peaking at 115, which hasn’t been registered since the early 1900’s during the great San Francisco fire.

At the same time… Fires ravaged more than 400 hectares of land and homes in southeastern France, Russia experienced ‘flash flooding forcing the evacuation of 20,000, and 95% of St Martin has been completely destroyed. Severe weather warnings in Europe include most of Italy, Greece and Croatia as heat and flash floods devastate what has been a drought. Water rationing in Rome and Palermo has been instituted.

What the heck is going on?

The Higgs Boson, or more commonly called The God Particle, is an ongoing experiment in Cern on the border of France and Switzerland.  Very secretive, information about particles is forthcoming, but little to no information is transparent about when, how and what the experiments are fused.   Could these smashing of particles be affecting weather and energy patterns across the globe?

Simplistically;  The caldron works with a presumed unstable particle manipulated in a vacuum, Higgs Boson, and through collision processes within a contained state analysis of the particle, it’s strength, its mass and it’s effects, is detailed. As tests are conducted, energy is manipulated and a ripple effect is created in which reality as it relates to time and to the concept of the Great Bang are analyzed.   As Hawkings has warned, we are playing with physical properties that we don’t understand, and the causal spins that these scientists may be creating could alter existence.

The simplistic concept that ‘climate change or global warming’ is attributed to manmade carbons approach is most likely a very carefully crafted detraction from what science, the military, and governments are prodding in their attempt to rule not just the world – but the universe through control of creation… Given that weather is a result of electromagnetic waves, colliding unstable particles is a Pandora’s Box like we can not even imagine.  And could explain the altered state we have created in our electromagnetic energy, ozone, and weather.

These severe weather anomalies have been raised in the news since the 1960’s which coincides with the experiments of HAARP.   This is not a new phenomena, but making the common man the scape goat – is.   It allows the governments to continue to experiment without taking responsibility for the consequences. HAARP, the US version of weather manipulation is well known. Supposedly, the government would have us believe that sometime in 2015, HAARP was chucked and given to the University of Alaska… Why? Because the government suddenly decided it didn’t care about weather modification any longer?   Because the military said it didn’t care about wining wars and control any longer?

REALLY?

A means of world control, is simply chucked and handed over to a – school?

Perhaps the land and an empty facility was handed over to the University, but I seriously doubt the expertise, the equipment, the data, and the scientists all simply shut down shop. More likely they relocated and used their data, knowledge and research in conjunction with – Higgs Boson experiments.

Coincidentally, Higgs Boson shut down for two years 2013 to June 2015, about the same time HAARP was shut down – relocated…

In science, the casualties of experiments whether mice, rats, dogs, cats or humans are considered worthy for The Greater Good.