Africa Land Grabs and Agenda 2030 – A UN Ponzi Scheme

The UN is attempting to fund the African Land Grabs through the implementation of Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2063 utilizing public, government and private money that they call ‘wealth redistribution’ or simply ‘sharing’.  

While Nero watched – The Roman Empire Burned…  And while we have been diverted by media silliness, Africa has been bought and sold to the highest bidders and is now the target of multi-national corporations as they seek to reap her rewards through a series of UN Agendas.

And the new micro-lending platform is – crypto currency!  Which explains why suddenly Soros has done a complete about face and started investing in this voodoo money.  But he isn’t alone by any means.  FinComEco, a British firm employing former Ministers and Bankers has been accumulating crypto loans.  American International Agriculture Group is busily setting up shop in Algeria.  GMEX Group, Blockchain Commodities, Chinese companies, all see the potential ravaging to be gained.

Within their chain of companies they provide genetically engineered seeds, and genetically enhanced animals which they sell to the impoverished farmers that have been displaced by the Land Grabs with money generated by the UN in its programs to end poverty and ‘share the wealth’ while creating lending bubbles and high interest rates of return – temporarily – until the swap bubble bursts.  WHEW!

The first Africa Agenda was introduced in 1992 under the surname, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.  It generated a lot of attention, but failed to do anything despite its grandioso plugging. The UN simultaneously created the Kyoto Protocol after the Montreal Protocol was a valueless failure in 1987.

The Montreal Protocol was supposed to protect the ozone layer.  After a bunch of countries signed on, it was considered a huge success!  The Kyoto Protocol was created in 2005 to fight Global Warming through the reduction of greenhouse emissions.  The US never ratified this agreement and Canada, Russia, Japan and New Zealand withdrew in 2012.  The UN is busily making Agendas and Protocols, but the agenda would seem to be to further their agenda…more than anything else.

What these nice squeaky Protocols did create was a market derivative scheme called “Emissions Trading”.  Permit credits to pollute are sold and traded like a commodity.   The largest program is the European Union Emission Trading Scheme.  They even have a spot market where they can buy futures and options internationally.   California has it own such trading market, as does the US, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the UK.

Follow the Money.

Therefore, we can assume that these UN Agendas will create pockets of trading wealth as well for masses of large corporations.  With the land grabs effectively concluded in Africa, the next agenda was to get government money to fund the infrastructure for the corporate agriculture tracts. Climate Change, the Paris Agreement was supposed to fill that void of funding need, but seemed to fall on its face.  Hence the UN needed to create Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2063 for the purpose of creating heartfelt needs to end ‘poverty’ in Africa through wealth ‘sharing’.

Who has signed on to these Agendas?  The UN and African Union leaders.   The African Union Leaders just recently unveiled their brand new headquarters in Ethiopia that cost $200 million and was built by and gifted by – China.  Although record keeping of land leases in Africa are scarce, it is estimated that China now holds as much as 100 million hectares of agriculture land.

Of course the African Leaders don’t mind China taking over their country at all because a good portion, if not all the money is pocketed and transferred to offshore accounts like the Panama Paper Caper.

Land Grabs have also been concluded in South America where Soros and Gates purchased large swathes for production purposes.

Owning the world’s food and water supply is a heady agenda.  Using the UN to grab money from governments, aka taxpayers, to fund their products that they will later sell at a premium to the taxpayers that funded them – is even headier.  I’m sure they are laughing all the way to the bank…

Ozone Hole is Shrinking? Because…

The Ozone Hole is shrinking – according to Scientific reports released in 2016! In fact, it appears that the main reason it is shrinking is because of the natural global temperature changes, ie, warmer temperatures in the polar regions cause the hole to shrink and rising temperatures in the stratosphere also play a significant role. This would indicate that over thousands of years as the earth’s temperatures rise and cool, holes develop and disappear as a common reaction. According to NASA.

Of course, the MSM would liken the decrease to the Montreal Protocol which called for the decreased use of CFC gases such as those coming from spray bottles…   However, there is absolutely no evidence to support this theory, instead scientists are pointing to the natural occurrences of global weather shifts as the most significant contributing factor.

According to ‘climate predictions’, the hole was slated to return to its 1980’s size sometime between 2050 and 2070.   However, as of 2017 it is already its 1988 size, once again proving that science is at best – a theory.   The Montreal Protocol which was signed in 1987 and initiated in 1989, was only sporadically implemented across the globe, had multiple phase out time frames, and did not include HCFC’s until 2015 when the Ozone Hole had already dwarfed in size.   In addition, not all countries banned the use of CFC’s; China, India and South Korea still proliferate their use.

Du Pont began producing hydrofluorocarbons as an alternative to the phasing out of CFC’s. However, it was later discovered that these HFC’s contribute to Global Warming and they became the target of the Kyoto Protocol which sought to ban their use worldwide  Unfortunately, they had already become mass produced and were a market source around the globe. So, a lean period was initiated in which phase outs were established to be in full force as of 2020 for developed countries and 2030 for developing countries…

But the phaseout hasn’t happened. In fact, the largest producers include; Coca-Cola, DuPont, Honeywell, ThermoKing and Carrier Transicold. Problem? Of course, the alternatives that have been put in service to phaseout the HFC’s are also now considered unsafe… But they haven’t been banned because there really isn’t an alternative that has been created that is considered ‘safe’ although everything is delisted via a Climate Protocol so as to create a phaseout sometime in the future – maybe in 3 or 4 decades… but in the meantime we’ve already discovered that the natural variation in climate is fixing the problem without Scientists involvement.

Gee Whilakers!  Bottom line?

We have replaced the CFC’s that were thought to have ‘caused’ the Ozone Hole with a number of alternate compounds including HFC’s and HCFC’s and R’s and Q’s galore, only to discover that all the alternates are also causing Global Warming and the depletion of the Ozone layer, only to find that everything is super-naturally fixing itself – anyway!

Whew!

I’m sure glad Science fixed all those problems for us!   Cause I sure don’t know w hat we would do otherwise…

 

In the meantime, not to be left out of the loop of god status, the EPA announced in 2015 that they were going to call for a phaseout of all HFC’s as a part of Obama’s Climate Change Plan of Action. I guess they didn’t get the memo that the Ozone Hole was already fixing itself.   In the meantime, a report issued by the UN in 2016 stated that HFC use in ALL countries across the globe is expected to rise significantly over the coming decades averaging about 16% per country.

 

I guess NO ONE got the memo. But hey, the Ozone Hole continues to contract. FYI: the UN has an Ozone branch whose purpose is to study Ozone and to ask pretty please will everyone voluntarily reduce useage…

De Blasio Suing Oil Companies For Climate Change Amidst Budget Deficit

De Blasio is boldly going where no man has gone before – filing a lawsuit against multiple worldwide oil and gas companies for their role in Hurricane Sandy’s devastation, health issues, and infrastructure destruction to his great New York City… Oh, but wait, he isn’t just suing the oil companies, he is targeting NYC pension funds in an effort to ‘divest’ their investment in fossil fuels and divert it to Climate Change issues.   What?

BP, Conoco, Exxon, Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell are the major targets. Proving that they directly impacted climate change and caused harm to NYC specifically, is a rather uphill battle. But apparently one De Blasio and Company feel is possible and just might mitigate his ever defeated budget deficit.

According to the Budget Comptroller for NY, NYC is facing a deficit of as much as $7 billion as of March this year. According to the analysis, NYC could be facing a disaster scenario under the tutelage of De Blasio and he’s running scared with nowhere to turn to find the $$$$$.   In addition, Trump’s new tax plan could cause a massive exodus as taxpayers seek more friendly places to park their money given the limitations on interest deductions will impact their itemized deduction caps.  With some of the highest priced real estate in the country, mortgages are a mainstay. But the rationale was the deductibility of the interest.  No more.

As a result, De Blasio is scrambling and this is the best scenario he could come up with while attempting to capitalize on an issue that is embedded in the Liberal agenda – Climate Change.

De Blasio’s threat to redirect NYC pension fund investments is a bit of a smokescreen given the fund has been in a massive overhaul for the past 3 ½ years when Scott Stringer took office and declared that the retirement system was “hanging by a thread”. At issue was the fact that the returns delivered by the fund were considered inadequate and well below the market.   Implementing a comprehensive plan that Stringer estimated would take 5-10 years to become a powerhouse once again, cannot simply be ‘modified’ to coddle the whims of De Blasio. Fiduciary responsibilities dictate.

Two NGO’s are supporting the De Blasio move, Union of Concerned Scientists, which is the recipient of funding from George Soros, and 350.org, which is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation and has partnered with Global Greengrants Fund, a Soros Open Society promotion. In fact, according to their Form 990, the only grant made by 350.org was to Global Greengrants Fund.

 

Climatic Change, a journal established by Michael Oppenheimer and Gary Yohe, published a study claiming that climate damages such as rising sea levels and increased temperatures are a direct result of products sold by such companies as Chevron and ExxonMobil. In addition, the Union For Concerned Scientists (Soros funded) has joined in the fray of qualifying finger pointing by claiming that:   “We’ve known for a long time that fossil fuels are the largest contributor to climate change. What’s new here is that we’ve determined just how much specific companies’ products have caused the earth to warm and the seas to rise.”

The study suggests that all the major oil companies combined contributed to 10% of the global temperature increase between 1980 and 2010 and 4% of the rise in sea level.   The study specifically provides Hurricane Sandy as an example of rising sea levels magnified by climate change causing roughly $2 billion in damage over what would have occurred had there been no rise in sea levels.  The total estimated cost was $65 billion.  How they can make monetary determinations is a bit stretched…and seems to have no supporting documentation.

So, who commissioned this report?

The lead author of the report was Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate science director at the Union for Concerned Scientists. Coincidentally, Gary Yohe, who assisted in this publication, is also a Member of the NYC Panel on Climate Change. Somewhat a conflict of interest?

Further conflicts include the fact that Michael Oppenheimer also founded, Climate Action Network which is aligned with Soros Fund Management and Christine Lagarde, of France’s Economic Ministry.

So why would Soros want to hit the wallets of oil and gas executives?   Hitting the biggest oil giants, might give a boost to some of the smaller companies, like:  Petroleo Brasilerosa, California Resources, Valvoline, Rice Energy, Targa Resources and Diamondback all of which were owned in Soros portfolio last year.  Of course the hypocrisy doesn’t end there with Soros heavily invested in the Williams Pipeline company, and Columbia Pipeline which merged with Transamerica of the Keystone XL fame…   Creating a profit while belying ethics is the Soros windfall.

Other cities and counties suing the oil giants include California’s Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Oakland and Imperial Beach.   All these cities and counties project a continued significant budget deficit now and in the coming years… and tapping climate change might fill the gap…

By the time any legal action is concluded, Soros will be well out of the oil and gas investments – an easy bet.  Playing both sides, not unlike his play of Republicans and Democrats.  “Anyone, Anyone”…

The Green Climate Fund – A Soros Child

A funny thing happened on the way to the Forum, everyone cheered, but no one Changed… Germany has declared that it will not meet it’s Climate Change goals for 2020, China says it’s emissions will continue to rise through 2030, and France is mum, as in maybe no one in Paris will notice they have actually done – nothing. Six countries in the EU boast that they have met their goals as stipulated by the EU Commission; Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal and Romania. YEAH! Except they already complied as of 2014, because their goals were minimal and the economic crisis required ‘belt tightening’, so technically in order to meet goals they had to do – nothing.

So, despite the humbra of toxic words, toxic air hovers large and in charge.

Apparently, The Green Climate Fund is the body tasked with collecting and disbursing pledged funds from countries across the globe.   A quick overview: Japan has disbursed roughly 50% of pledges, Germany a third, The Netherlands a third, France roughly half, China -0-, UK about 2/3, and US 1/3, India -0-, and South America -0.

Of the $10 billion collected by The Green Climate Fund, roughly $45 million was spent on Administrative Expenses in 2017, and $35 million in 2016. Apparently, these hard working Board Members work on average – 10 days per month.   According to the 990 Tax Return dated 2014, it would appear that they raised about $88 million paid some salaries and operating costs and banked the balance. In 2017 they needed to create a investment fund management IT system to handle all the cash… Poor Babies.

Their latest project includes solving the Ethiopian drought problem thru an investment of $45 million to be developed over a five year period.   So far, they haven’t actually ‘done’ anything except draft a proposal – funding = $0.   They have pledged $38.5 million toward Columbia in order to improve the ecosystem.   This too is a proposal for which no actual work has been done and no money disbursed.   They have pledged $57 million to Argentina in the form of a “Loan”, $0 actually disbursed. There is an outstanding pledge grant of $31.4 million to Egypt for infrastructure rebuilding, nothing disbursed. A grant of $26.9 million to Nauru, the world’s smallest island, for the purpose of developing a climate resistant port. No dollars disbursed.

In fact, it would appear that the funds are primarily targeting ‘infrastructure and water shortages’. Both of these issues are certainly important, they just aren’t about changing the global warming trend that the fund stipulates to be their purpose.  So why are they funding these projects?

Who are the recipients? Namibia, Morocco, Senegal, Maldives, Ecuador, Mali, Gambia, Tualu, Armenia, Vietnam, El Salvador, Fiji, Peru, etc…

A Few Examples:

Malawi: USAID has been working with the government of Malawi for years to help mitigate agricultural shifts and provide drought security. USAID budget request for 2018 was $15.4 billion. So why is the Green Fund duplicating USAID?

Maldives: They have been battling a losing battle as the sea’s rise and the islands are swamped. Their 2008 government plant to abandon ship and relocate was dismissed and a $10 billion contract with the Saudi’s was initiated whereby they would secure their shipping route safety and develop the islands for tourism relocating thousands of local people. So is The Green Fund actually collaborating with the Saudi’s?

Ecuador:   Ecuador has been raising it’s fist to resolve water issues for years. The government has made some radical changes, particularly in energy investment and diversity. Partnering with the European Commission thru EUROCLIMA, they have spent $4.2 billion on energy projects.   They are currently funded by the REDD+ Program within the UN. So why is The Green Fund duplicating funding projects?

It would appear, that The Green Fund is simply a duplicate board tasked with billions of dollars in funding whose purpose may very well be to create a slush fund to give the appearance of battling Climate Change, aka, Global Warming, when in fact it is sustaining the infrastructure, agriculture and energy growth of third world countries. To what ultimate goal?  

Given it’s purported goal is to raise $100 billion per year, it should be noted that it’s Board of Directors is predominantly comprised of Arabs, Africans, and various representatives from the Netherlands, many of whom seem to be devoid of a background, with the exception of the Globalist, Leonardo Martinez-Diaz. He has written extensively on globalizing emerging and developing countries in order to create a Global Order. He is a Global Director at Sustainable Finance Center at the World Resources Institute.

World Resources Institute partners with the George Soros – Open Society Foundations.

And there you have it: The Green Climate Fund, which is demanding contributions in the range of $100 billion annually, is utilizing those funds to create a global network of developing countries so as to ultimately incorporate their governments into a unified One World Order. Climate Change/Global Warming are simply tag phrases to sucker the funds for – The Greater Good of the Order of George Soros.

Weather Modification – The God Particle

With Hurricane Harvey behind us, Hurricane Irma barreling down on us, and apparently two more offshore waiting in line, what isn’t being reported are the 81 large raging fires across the US, burning 1.4 million acres to date. Of the 81 fires, 58 are still ‘uncontrolled’.  And the US weather extremes are a global phenomena.

Without any warning from the ‘media’, in Colorado we woke up Monday to what was called ‘light smoke’. That meant you had a visibility of about a mile, your eyes burned, your throat was rough, scratchy and dry, and everything smelled like fire. Being outdoors for more than 15 minutes was said to be dangerous to your health.   Twelve other states were experiencing ‘heavy smoke’ that was considered hazardous.

But absolutely nothing in the mainstream media?

The smoke from the fires in the northwest was so pervasive they were experiencing it in North Carolina.  Not a word.

Washington has declared a state of emergency, the fires are threatening Glacier National Park and Yosemite, and there are numerous evacuations in both Oregon and Washington.  Not a word.

San Francisco was experiencing temperatures over one hundred, peaking at 115, which hasn’t been registered since the early 1900’s during the great San Francisco fire.

At the same time… Fires ravaged more than 400 hectares of land and homes in southeastern France, Russia experienced ‘flash flooding forcing the evacuation of 20,000, and 95% of St Martin has been completely destroyed. Severe weather warnings in Europe include most of Italy, Greece and Croatia as heat and flash floods devastate what has been a drought. Water rationing in Rome and Palermo has been instituted.

What the heck is going on?

The Higgs Boson, or more commonly called The God Particle, is an ongoing experiment in Cern on the border of France and Switzerland.  Very secretive, information about particles is forthcoming, but little to no information is transparent about when, how and what the experiments are fused.   Could these smashing of particles be affecting weather and energy patterns across the globe?

Simplistically;  The caldron works with a presumed unstable particle manipulated in a vacuum, Higgs Boson, and through collision processes within a contained state analysis of the particle, it’s strength, its mass and it’s effects, is detailed. As tests are conducted, energy is manipulated and a ripple effect is created in which reality as it relates to time and to the concept of the Great Bang are analyzed.   As Hawkings has warned, we are playing with physical properties that we don’t understand, and the causal spins that these scientists may be creating could alter existence.

The simplistic concept that ‘climate change or global warming’ is attributed to manmade carbons approach is most likely a very carefully crafted detraction from what science, the military, and governments are prodding in their attempt to rule not just the world – but the universe through control of creation… Given that weather is a result of electromagnetic waves, colliding unstable particles is a Pandora’s Box like we can not even imagine.  And could explain the altered state we have created in our electromagnetic energy, ozone, and weather.

These severe weather anomalies have been raised in the news since the 1960’s which coincides with the experiments of HAARP.   This is not a new phenomena, but making the common man the scape goat – is.   It allows the governments to continue to experiment without taking responsibility for the consequences. HAARP, the US version of weather manipulation is well known. Supposedly, the government would have us believe that sometime in 2015, HAARP was chucked and given to the University of Alaska… Why? Because the government suddenly decided it didn’t care about weather modification any longer?   Because the military said it didn’t care about wining wars and control any longer?

REALLY?

A means of world control, is simply chucked and handed over to a – school?

Perhaps the land and an empty facility was handed over to the University, but I seriously doubt the expertise, the equipment, the data, and the scientists all simply shut down shop. More likely they relocated and used their data, knowledge and research in conjunction with – Higgs Boson experiments.

Coincidentally, Higgs Boson shut down for two years 2013 to June 2015, about the same time HAARP was shut down – relocated…

In science, the casualties of experiments whether mice, rats, dogs, cats or humans are considered worthy for The Greater Good.

Houston Underwater – Costs

The Houston flood evacuations are just the tip of the iceberg as still waters destroy homes, furnishings, personal items, and memories. In order for these costs to be covered, resident’s would have to have a flood insurance policy. But even then, there are caps, $250,000 for structure and $100,000 for contents. Anything over and beyond would require a homeowner to foot the bill themselves. In the meantime, waiting for waters to recede, the reality is residents will be waiting in long lines as government scrambles, insurance adjusters scramble and construction workers scramble – and most likely relocate where business will be booming.

Beaumont and Port Arthur have a 67% homeownership rate, for a total population of about 408,000.   The total number of housing units in the area is roughly 175,000 of which about 20,000 have flood insurance policies. The reason? Policy rates can cost anywhere from $450 to $8000 per year, over and above a typical homeowner policy.

Harris and Galveston counties are even less insured with over 4 million residents and only 300,000 flood policies.

But it isn’t just residences, business insurance policies are also limited as to what they cover in the event of a flood. Financial losses and loss of use of property are not covered. Limitations apply to the amount of loss, $500,000 building and $500,000 inventory unless excess coverage is in place. All of this assuming flood insurance was purchased.

In the meantime, it would appear that the money handlers in Hollywood are forking over ‘prayers’ instead of ‘help’, much to the chagrin of residents. Exceptions to the rule include some businesses and the CEO for the Titans who appear to understand the enormity of the need.

Looking back at the Katrina cleanup bill hopefully we will have learned a few lessons.   While Harry Reid made the outspoken statement that it would cost between $200 and $250 billion, the tab included some odd costs, such as;   mental health and substance abuse services – $400 million, rebuild early childhood ‘programs’ – $600 million, and $25.5 million for sugar cane ‘research’.   While it is not politically correct to question these costs in the wake of the suffering, money wasted is still, money wasted.

The other impact that Katrina and Harvey will tally is our gas prices. After Katrina gas prices nearly reached $5 gallon, and the economy plummeted from 3.8% to 1.3% before jacking up to 4.8%! A positive.

Agenda’s abound whenever the opportunity arises, and the Harvey hurricane has cockroaches streaming out of the woodwork claiming “It’s Global Warming! It’s Global Warming!”   Well, maybe it is and maybe it isn’t, what they don’t know can fill an ocean compared to a thimble of water of what they do know.

Of course the obvious question would be, if it is Global Warming, then why haven’t the residents all moved inland, away from the gulf coast which will surely be battered again?   Nor does this address the consensus of Global Warming/Climate Change/Man Made.  

If you can’t control the cause, then you mitigate or avoid the circumstance.  

In other words, weather patterns have parlayed their destruction for thousands of years. And although scientists can’t tell us with 100% accuracy what the weather will be tomorrow, they believe they can tell us what it will be in a hundred years.   And if they’re wrong, they will give us hindsight as to how being right was beyond their – control.

Apparently, scientists claim to have created very fancy algorithms that they can apply to determine if a particular weather event was a result of climate change. However, it does take months to complete before it is submitted for peer review and more months of analysis.  Therefore at this juncture – they DON’T KNOW.

Therefore, at this point NO scientist can make a claim one way or the other without that claim being based on theory and false doctrine.   And such a scientist would be considered quite remiss, unprofessional and unorthodox in making any claim or statement.

What the weather scientists did state some months ago was the fact that the Atlantic would experience an increase in hurricanes. This increase could simply be a result of El Nino, a pattern that has existed for thousands of years and causes unusually warm temperatures in the ocean. Between 1970 and 2015, there were 17 El Nino years, according to NASA.  In fact, the climatologists were stating that El Nino would wreak havoc the second half of 2017 and this was reported according to Insurance Journal, NOAA, the Climate Prediction Center, Global Weather Oscillations, Accuweather, Forbes, Weather Trends, etc… etc… etc…

Of course it isn’t nearly as fun for the media to report common cyclical events as the cause.   Inciting hysteria and Chicken Little panic claiming ‘the sky is falling’ sells more advertising. And promotes an agenda… Hollywood?  I think I hear the beat of a tom-tom, get ready for the rhetoric – not the wallets.

Hawking – Water – and Over Population

Stephen Hawking has issued another dire warning stating that world population will outpace resources within 100 years and apocalyptic trends are highly probable.

It isn’t the first time he has issued such catastrophic warnings. But his solution of moon settlement seems rather odd, to say the least. First the moon has no usable resources. Second the moon is highly fragile and upsetting its balance could actually ‘cause’ the earth to enter a cataclysmic stage.  And third, how many people could it support? The answer is none. Fleeing earth that has resources to settle on the moon that has NO resources seems rather ill-advised.

The other alternative being juggled by NASA and the science community is to colonize Mars. This too seems rather inane given that all scientific data theorize that while Mars ‘may have’ had water resources at one time, due to it’s death, those resources can not be harvested. So again, why would we leave an abundant planet for a death planet?

One of the greatest fears is earth’s population explosion. Over the last couple hundred years, Europe’s population has declined, the US has risen minimally, even Africa’s population growth rate is a graphic low. The abundance comes from one source – China. For thousands of years China’s population remained stagnant. Then in 1750 it took a sharp tick upward and by 2017 had risen from 140 million to 1.5 billion, representing 20% of the entire world population.

India’s population is a close second with 1.3 billion, and Africa clambering behind at 1.186 billion. As a region, Asia accounts for 60% of the world population.

Why is this important? Because altering demographics in Europe and North America are going to have little to no effect on the overall crisis of the earth having too many people to sustain.

China’s one child policy was introduced in 1979 when the population was 977.8 million. So despite a one child policy, China’s total population grew 54% matching the total growth rate of India!     Not exactly a success story.  During the same period the US growth was 43%. While China and India can’t boast immigration as a factor in their growth, Europe and the US can, so their rates are a bit skewed and most likely quite lower in actuality.

There are only two means of reducing growth – via birth or via death…

And there is only one way to mitigate lacking resources – attach someone elses.

The most important resource is water.

And while scientists are trying to determine how they can harvest water on the moon, earthlings continue to fail to capture the water already generated here! Wouldn’t it make more sense to preserve?   California is the most mundane example of a state whose usage of water is massive, and yet every seven years whines about drought conditions when they haven’t built a reservoir to capture the rainfall when it is abundant!    Instead it is left to drain into the ocean, unused, wasted.   These same Californians would have us spend trillions $$$$ to extract a couple gallons from the Moon…

Just to prove it exists.

Half of California’s water resources go to watering grass, 14% is lost due to leaky pipes, and 27% is used for toilets… The average water use per family in the US is roughly 552 gallons per day.  However, the largest user of our water resources is through thermoelectric power which consumes roughly 41.5% of all usage.

In other words, all those conservation electric power plants consume 41.5% of our water resources. The states with the largest water draws for thermoelectric power include California, Texas, New York and Michigan. Once again, the circle takes us back to California where consumption of our most valuable resource is the highest, and preservation is the lowest.

Preservation and solutions seem a better way to resolve our earthly problems rather than leaving a dead planet in order to colonize another dead planet… Of course, transporting 7 billion people to the moon isn’t exactly feasible either. It took thirty years to build the Space Shuttle and it can hold 7 people.

PLAN B!

Hawking?  Anyone?  Anyone?

Paris Climate Agreement: SHAMEFUL SHAM

Does anyone know exactly what the Paris Climate Agreement says? Because, if you are like me – the answer is “No”.

So, I decided to read/skim through the Agreement in order to see what all the fuss is about:

  1. It utilizes words like ‘aim’ and ‘goal’ quite a bit to define its terms.
  2. It seems to address catastrophic events quite a bit, which would be more like a universal FEMA.
  3. As with all good intentions, so far, the US is one of only a spattering of countries that has actually anted any money via cash and/or commitment, amounting to about 1/3 of the total so far.
  4. In fact, France, US and Japan are the ONLY developed countries that have put their money where their mouth is.
  5. As with all such contracts, the UN, in all their bloated transparency, would be the ‘accountant’ and ‘distributor’ of funds.
  6. Every nation’s aim or goal is not subject to any legal requirement at all, the only legal requirement is that each country report their progress.
  7. The ‘emission cut targets for 2016’ were 3’, verses the 2’ required by the Agreement, so right off the assembly line, it reports a failure rate of 50%.
  8. Bottom line – everything is ‘voluntary’ – no incentive, no consequence.
  9. Everybody ‘should’ cooperate, everybody ‘should ‘share’, everybody ‘should’ be transparent…and nice.   Sounds like a Kindergarten lesson plan.
  10. And this one is scary! “The Conference of the Parties, the supreme body of the Convention, shall serve as the meeting of the Parties to this Agreement.”

“Supreme Body”, sounds like a Communist takeover.

Aims and goals can be funny things from a purely business standpoint. Imagine the Saudi’s wrote a contract with Boeing to provide $5 billion in aerospace and military equipment. They would aim to pay at the time of delivery. They take delivery and decide their aim was not realistic and so they defer payment for another 25 years…

That’s what an aim looks like in the business world, and that’s why this Paris Agreement is worthless.

In addition, there are three parties that have not signed, 2 of which the media notates regularly, Syria and Iraq. The third is The Holy See.

Of the 195 countries signing the Agreement, 20 are responsible for a greater than 1% contribution to the global emissions with China, the EU and the US representing about 48%.  That means, that the combined largest polluters are going to raise more than $100 billion annually to fund a bunch of UN jobs to oversee the money and distribute it to countries that have little to no effect on global emissions.  What the HEY?

That is our UN hard at work!

The Agreement further denotes ‘Capacity Building’. Meaning the UN and developed countries will ‘enhance’ developing countries to take action to change the effects of climate change on their ‘Party country’.

Sounds like a global initiative to come in the backdoor and take control of a country, telling them what to do, how, where and why, when the country isn’t even contributing to climate change in the first place…

Fishy is as Fishy does.

Appears more likely that the Paris Agreement is a detractor cover for a global seizure of small countries so as to incorporate them into the larger country – the UN because it has nothing to do with ‘climate’ and everything to do with building out these smaller countries so that they can be mined and owned.   Like the African Land Grabs – only on a global scale.

Obama Makes Carbon Footprint in Milan!

Obama has exited his 14 car convoy of petrol smog infused pollution to board a private jet emitting billows of caustic fumes to present a paid for speech in Milan decrying the nasty, nasty carbon footprints causing Global Warming.

Oh, and despite the fact that he makes $600,000 per gig, we the US Taxpayers, are paying for this little jaunt because well, he’s an ex-President and entitled to security.

He is taking his personal chef with him to talk about ‘healthy eating’ as in yum let’s eat all that Monsanto laden GMO because it promotes genetic mutations and cancers that boost the profits of the pharmaceuticals as they continue to parlay drugs that have more side effects than cure effects so they can parlay more drugs to offset the side effects…and make lots of money to pay exorbitant fees to such presenters as – Obama.

Whew. Got that one off my chest.

Oddly, it would appear that Michelle will not accompany him despite the fact that she ‘initiated’ a blog directed towards healthy eating for children with a goal of reducing obesity… Of course, the fact that obesity rose during her blogging initiative is rarely reported.

Of course, Michelle probably needs a rest after being the keynote speaker at a conference for the American Institute of Architects, where she discussed – architecture, something she has absolutely no knowledge about whatsoever. She was pulled in as the keynote speaker at the very last minute after someone complained there weren’t enough women being represented at the conference??? More SUV caravans, more private jets, more taxpayer funds.

It should not be lost that the Milan conference is about food engineering and technology. That would indicate that Obama’s chef will show the attendees how to create appetizing concoctions from genetically manufactured globules.

YUM. Definitely worth the carbon footprint!  I wonder how much it will cost us?

Cancer and Diseases Rising in Young Adults!

Articles are suddenly sprouting about the rise in rates of colon and rectal cancer among our youth. The reason?  Diet and Environment. Which translates to the same place – chemicals/pesticides that leach into our food and our environment that are known toxins and yet still widely used.

There are 40 known cancer causing toxins being used in our school classrooms each and every day! They are associated with Kidney and Liver damage, birth defects, neurotoxicity, thyroid disruption, reproductive disruption and just – Cancer.

Do you think there is a connection?

Do you think there is any chance anything will be done?

While our esteemed FDA an d EPA are miffed that all their hard work in nationalizing our food and water and land they forgot about the real tragic pollutants that are decimating our youth.

There is a solution – Homeschool and Organic. But the vast majority of our population refuse to consider those options, and so they demand more vaccines, more prescription meds, instead of actually considering the death march that is assaulting us.

The pesticides are sold as household products to kill insects, weeds, crab grass, etc.., they are used on golf courses, in wood veneers, mosquito control, mold, algae, and used in the production of lettuce, alfalfa, hay, rhubarb, endive, berries, artichokes, legumes, Christmas trees, potatoes, and stone fruits (peaches, plums, apricots, nectarines).

For me that’s a big part of my diet. And for young people who think they are eating healthily, they are instead being poisoned.

But it doesn’t even stop there. BPA which came on the market in the 1950’s is used in plastic bottles, the lining of cans, plastic wrap and cashier sheets. The EPA says it is perfectly safe for humans … except it is banned from all baby products. In my world, babies are humans and if it isn’t good for them – it isn’t good for anyone!

Of course, not to be left high and dry, manufacturers created a substitute for BPA, BPS. But BPS is apparently just as harmful, affecting the hormonal and endocrine system and crossing from mother to baby via the placenta decreasing pre-birth growth.

According to The American Cancer Society, people born in 1990 have double the risk of contracting rectal cancer than people born in 1950 had during their 20’s and 30’s. While the rate of colon cancer has declined in recent years, the decline is not because the disease is less likely, it is because of early detections due to screening. But young people aren’t screened, so their rates have steadily climbed and are suggested to continue that trend.

In fact, nearly all cancers are rising, a footprint that can find it’s love-matc in the more and more expansive use of chemicals – pesticides and – herbicides leaching into our food, water and air.

When monitoring and evaluating a particular pesticide, a critical factor that the EPA does not consider is the effect of ’40 CHEMCIALS’.   One chemical may be deemed low, but add 39 more that are varied from low to high and you have a veritable Molotov cocktail!

It seems a natural consideration, but then the EPA is not a natural defender of humans, instead they have become a proponent of chemical manufacturers. Monsanto and Bayer and DOW and DuPont and Syngenta are the groomers.

And in a perfectly corrupt world, they would be working in collusion with the big pharma giants as one creates the disease and the other creates a drug for the disease… But no one considers a – cure.