Climate Refugee’s – The New Agenda

Germany’s Socialist Deutsche Welle news outlet has found a way to combine the plight of immigration with the plight of Climate Change – “Climate Refugee’s”.   Citing Central America as being in the midst of a unprecedented drought, DW uses this to vilify Trump as he supports building a Wall thereby exacerbating the immigration plight of the Climate Refugees.

The Central America Dry Corridor has existed for hundreds of years. Not unlike California, it is vulnerable to the climate implications of El Nino and la Nina. These forces produce years of flooding and years of drought. Like California, the countries most vulnerable have done absolutely nothing to mitigate these weather troughs and thus agriculture is severely impacted.   It is estimated that upwards of a million people are affected by the instability of this corridor.

In 2015, the UN signed massive agreements on behalf of Central America to support ‘resilience’ as a result of the negative climate impacts. “Sustainable Goals” were launched under the Paris Accord. And by 2016 a Commission was created and an ‘agenda’ was developed.   By the end of 2016, the UN had held high level meetings and a proposal was put forth to spend $80 million to mitigate the climate effects.

By the end of 2017 another committee was created which formally announced that an agenda did exist and that indeed the Dry Corridor was vulnerable…

Still, nothing was actually done.

Today, the World Bank has created a five year program in Honduras that will ‘build resilience for 6,000 people who are extremely poor’.   The program aims to teach these people ‘food security, irrigation, fertilization and healthy diets’ thereby increasing their income and lifting them out of poverty.

Houston – we have a problem…  THREE years of doing nothing is exactly why the Paris Accord is a catastrophe.

Radical climate fluctuations resulting from traditional events such as El Nino create radical climate events, ie flooding and drought. To mitigate and preserve agriculture would entail capturing the water in reservoirs during periods of flooding, and having those reserves piped to agriculture land in periods of drought.   No amount of healthy diet training and fertilization is going to help when the land is ravaged by water or desert.

A program to lift .6% of the population that has been designated as extremely poor into agriculture sustainability through healthy diet training over a period of five years – is NOT a solution in any sense of the word.

The US gives Honduras roughly $70 million in aid each year for the purpose of Humanitarian and Development assistance and Military assistance.   Of the total aid, 11% is designated for military assistance, and 89% for Economic development.  This would be taxpayer $$$$.

In the EU, five countries stand out as pledging the most to the ODA, Official Development Assistance organization, which is tasked with promoting economic development in developing countries.   Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg, Denmark and The Netherlands lead the EU in dedicating money to assist developing economies become more gender equal.   Apparently, Women Empowerment is thought to be critical to agriculture sustainability development. The remaining 10 countries that pledged money – apparently never actually coughed it all up including two noteworthy countries: Germany and France.

While no one argues against gender equality, the fact that Economic Development is now defined as gender equality for the purposes of economic aid – is perhaps why these countries remain economically undeveloped.   It explains why their agriculture is devastated year after year, it explains why their countries remain poor, and why aid does absolutely nothing to lift them out of poverty. They are not building reservoirs, dams, irrigation systems, pipelines, etc… to capture and preserve water, instead they are being told what constitutes a healthy diet, and given classes in gender equality training.

So despite the fact that infinite amounts of millions have been given to these countries within the Dry Corridor, nothing has been done to alleviate the problem by these dedicated numerous charities in association with the UN.  And instead, the UN and the EU defacto Germany have decried that the Border Wall, aka Trump, is to blame for all the ails that have persisted for decades.

In essence the EU and UN are simply looking for a way to align Climate Change money with Women Empowerment by teaching what constitutes a healthy diet to countries that have no food, and sell them fertilizers in the process.   Ah.

Personally I find this to be fake news, propaganda, disinformation, and hate speech toward our President.   All of which are punishable offenses requiring fines, censorship, and jail time according to German Law.

The Green New Deal: A Carbon Tax For Socialists

Ocasio-Cortez has stated that mankind will be vanquished in 12 years.  Her New Green Deal has a time frame of 10 years to implement assuming it starts – today.   In the EU, they continue to establish time frames reaching emission goals extending to 2050 – 31 years in the future.   China really doesn’t give a rat’s arse, they just agree to whatever proposal is put forth, sign on the dotted line, and then refuse to actually comply.   What makes the Green New Deal so ridiculous is that it only applies to the US.   So the rest of the world will keep producing their climate change pollution, push out their goals 31 years in the future, and we’ll all be Socially broke or dead.

The Green New Deal states that the US will be the major exporter of Green technology, expertise, products, and services.  But according to her calculations, there would be no one left to export to because they missed the train and did nothing – so they would be dead.

Who wrote the Green New Deal?

The Media would have us believe that Ocasio-Cortez was the author.  However, her acumen would beg to differ.  In fact, Ed Markay, who is listed as ‘co-author’, is likely the frontrunner.  However, given the world of politics, I imagine they both had the help of some powerful prompters who hired the best writers to create this monstrosity.

What is not so headlined is the fact that the Green Deal calls for the implementation of the “social cost of carbon”, which is essentially a tax first introduced by Obama.   It is basically the same ‘tax’ that disproportionally affects low income workers and resulted in the Yellow Vest Movement in France.  Not working too well.

The basic concept of a carbon tax is that the increased cost will incentivize industries to find ways to pollute less, and incentivize citizens to stay home more and conserve.  A number of economists feel this tax will lower emissions while creating more jobs.  But there is absolutely no correlative proof that a carbon tax creates jobs…and despite its implementation in France and Germany, they have failed again to reach their stated goals pushing the date ever further.  What it does provide is revenue for governments to offset deficit spending or divert elsewhere.

Today, the Federal and state governments impose excise taxes on gasoline.  The federal tax is 18.4cents per gallon, while state taxes vary but range roughly in the 31cent range.   We are already being taxed around 50cents per gallon.   Why isn’t this money spent on ‘green stuff’?

Where did this tax originate?

The Revenue Act of 1932 incorporated the first oil tax at 1cent per gallon.   The purpose?  To help balance the budget deficit.   Over 86 years the tax has increased by 5000%.  That’s called government spending.

According to a report by Science Direct in 2016, $28 billion in carbon revenues are collected each year from 40 different countries.  Of that total, 27% is used to subsidize green spending in energy efficiency, the balance is allocated to a general fund and to corporate and individual taxpayers through tax cuts and rebates.   In fact, Sweden, the UK, British Columbia, Mexico, Finland and Iceland spend -0-% on Green Funding.   Australia spends 15%.  Germany and Canada are not mentioned.

The point is simplistic. The Socialist Agenda is always ‘how funds should be spent’, rather than ‘how funds are spent’.

Which companies reap the reward of the Green Funding?

According to a report issued by Friends of Science,;

“Since 1991, the Energy Foundation has been the main instrument that a network of influential U.S. foundations has used to define a portfolio of policy options, political strategies, and energy technologies to address global warming. It was set up by way of large block grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, and MacArthur Foundation, and supported in later years by the Hewlett Foundation, Packard Foundation, and other funders. The Energy Foundation’s principal function is to “leverage money in a highly concentrated pattern on behalf of policies that shift markets, industry, and consumers in the direction of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency practices.

It should come as no surprise that the aforementioned foundations are ALL Liberal, Democrat affiliates.

Of course no Green Funding Dark Money scam is complete without highlighting Al Gore.  Between 1999 and 2019, Al Gore managed to amass a personal wealth rivaling Mitt Romney, pegged at over $300 million.  In 1999, his wealth was calculated at roughly $1.5 million all of which was inherited from his family.  His entire fortune was amassed through companies he started that mooched off the global warming scam.

And the Paris Climate Accord funds?  Those funds are predominantly shifted to spending in Africa whose carbon footprint is -0-.  If in fact Green Funding was Green, it would be spent on those countries whose footprint is the greatest – not the least…

When in doubt… follow der money.

And lastly, the media cites FDR’s New Deal as a compliment to the Green New Deal.  But FDR’s deal was the impetus that spiraled this country in a forever greater debt, a forever greater welfare, and a forever greater depletion of the middle class.  It is also noteworthy that the New Deal was implemented via Executive Order, because it would never have passed Congress.

UN: Climate Change…

The UN has a headlined article referencing climate change and the devastating effects sit has had on Africa.  Specifically, they cite Lake Chad which covered approximately 10,000 to 25,000 square km in 1983 and today fluctuates between 1500 and 2000 km.  The problem with the UN statement?  Lake Chad has been eroding since 5000 BC when it is estimated to have covered roughly 1 million km.

But the UN is still demanding that the member countries fork over $100 billion per year to defend against the travesties of climate change that is causing;  droughts, floods, conflict, hunger, famine, poverty, greater migration, political instability, Ebola, stress and lack of resilience.  They feel that the African governments are forced to syphon off money to combat these disasters when the money could be used for education, social programs, healthcare, and business development. Citing the cause of the current droughts to be the abnormally strong El Nino cycle, El Nino representing the warm cycle and La Nino the cool.  Of course, as with any graph, your starting point can significantly alter ones perception.

1980 seems to have been a particularly peak year according to the various methodology graphs which show a decidedly less El Nino impact since.   The previous comparable to the 1980 impact was in 1895 and again in 1910.  Not a lot of CO2 emissions then.  And hence the debate, at least as promulgated by the UN.

Most, if not all, scientific journals describe El Nino as a ‘natural phenomenon’.  In a nutshell, El Nino is caused by weakening trade winds. The trade winds are caused by a combination of convection air currents and the Earth’s rotation.  What would cause them to weaken?

The scenario becomes an argument of the chicken and the egg, which comes first?   Globalists argue that global warming causes weakened trade winds.  But if that were true, prior to industrialization the Oscillation Index would never oscillate – it would be static showing a beginning causal human effect. But it doesn’t.  Which leads to the alternate argument, weakened trade winds effectuate warming conditions.

Trade winds are a function of the pressure gradient of the atmosphere over the ocean.  And science has yet to determine what causes that pressure gradient change.   They can tell you what happens – but not why.

“Atmospheric pressure is caused by the gravitational attraction of the planet on the atmospheric gases above the surface, and is a function of the mass of the planet, the radius of the surface, and the amount and composition of the gases and their vertical distribution in the atmosphere.”

Atmospheric Pressure is governed by Atmospheric Tides. The Tides can be affected by:

 

“The reason for this dramatic growth in amplitude from tiny fluctuations near the ground to oscillations that dominate the motion of the mesosphere lies in the fact that the density of the atmosphere decreases with increasing height. As tides or waves propagate upwards, they move into regions of lower and lower density. If the tide or wave is not dissipating, then its kinetic energy density must be conserved. Since the density is decreasing, the amplitude of the tide or wave increases correspondingly so that energy is conserved.”

So we are back to defining The Chicken And The Egg:

Some of the classic causes of these changes include; a change in the Earth’s tilt, alteration in the Moon’s density and/or configuration, changes in the ‘tropics’ deforestation, etc… , and possibly weather manipulation – when nations try to alter El Nino and Al Nino to effect war, rain, snow, optimal weather for special events – The Olympics, etc… they alter the natural phenomenon.   And don’t know how to reinstate it.   So instead, they blame the causal factor elsewhere – a Distraction.

So, in other words, while Scientists are still fighting over the conundrum of The Chicken And The Egg, they are certain that when it comes to Climate Change it is….   They don’t know.

What exactly does the UN propose to do with $100 billion per year?

Spend it on Africa of course.  How?  By “empowering women to be effective climate action champions”, “supporting governments with improved information climate warning systems”, and “improving food security”.   Straight off the UN website.

Why Africa?

To understand the motives, one needs to understand who supports the UN.   It is increasingly clear that The People, do not.  That would leave ‘governments’.   Governments who have abdicated the power of The People, and chosen to bear Law, make decisions, pass legislation, and act quite like a Monarchial system.   It is our history.

Subordination.

Lately, we have all tossed about the terms Socialism and Communism, and yet, we have alluded to the ‘reign’ of Obama, and Queen Hillary, and perhaps not given those labels their fair due.   Because, in essence, in order to own the globe, one needs a “Supreme Leader”, a King/Queen, to dominate and officiate, and enslave.  As this earth has done for thousands of years – until now.

Today, that effect is more complicated.   People are more educated.   Wealth has been spread more liberally.   And everyone in Hollywood, the low lifes of the Monarchial times, today think they are ‘the monarchy’.   The Rulers.

In the end, you have to try and conceptualize the amount of money the UN is asking – $100 billion per year.   In addition, to their budget.  In addition to all the subsidiary budgets.  USAID. UNICEF.   Etc…

In conclusion, the UN’s worthiness and purpose have significantly deteriorated in the last decade or so, since Obama came to ‘reign’.  And perhaps it was really decades earlier, but Obama brought it to the surface, brought light to the corruption that he embraced and lived.

Not to say Obama was not simply a cog in the skew or puppetry would be short-sighted. Although egos would seem to dictate that most everyone we think are aligned, also think they are ‘worthy’ and elite.   And therefore believe they will be the few – saved.

Only to learn they are – the least.  It is ultimately – in your heart.

Trying to unravel the entire scheme of the Cabal is like trying to define the universe!  Not even Hawking could do that!   And yet, we are stubborn, and try.   The Cabal is an interesting lineage that dates thousands of years into our history which apparently we can only retain for 100 days.???   

Woolsey Fire: Site of Toxic Waste and Methane Leak

Santa Susana is located in Simi Valley California where a fire erupted recently.  It is also home to the highly controversial Santa Susana Field Laboratory – a nuclear waste facility that has been the topic of cleanup for decades.  I say ‘topic’ because battles continue as to who is responsible for the mess:  PG&E, Boeing, NASA and DOE.

Located 30 miles from downtown LA, the site has been used for the development and testing of liquid propellant rocket engines, nuclear reactors, and liquid metals research.   It is considered considerably contaminated.  It also sits directly on top of some of California’s major fault lines, including the San Andreas, according to a map prepared by California Geological Survey.  The valley was created as a result of tectonic shifts and earthquake action.

The area has been host to horror stories of contaminations, toxicity, deaths, leaks, and meltdowns since 1959.  Yet it still remains.  Radioactive fires, fission gas releases, burn pits, and containment structures that had a ten year life span and not housed with concrete domes.   The meltdown was said to be nearly 460 times that of the Three Mile Island catastrophe in Pennsylvania.

The Woolsey fire is suspected to have begun at the Rocketdyne facility of Simi Valley’s Santa Susan Field Laboratory.   The contamination that was in the soil was thus captured and spread via the fire into the air.  Yet the LA Public Health Department issued a statement that it was ‘safe’.  Nuclear, burn pit and radioactive toxins likely ignited the fire, yet LA says it is safe.

As recently as 2006, the lab was cited for wastewater runoff that had contaminated Bell Creek and the Los Angeles River including, chromium, dioxin, lead, mercury and other pollutants.

In 2007 California passed a bill citing standards for cleanup, the standards are being contested and the cleanup has stalled.

California has five nuclear waste sites that are no longer active due to meltdowns;  San Onofre which sits on a beach between LA and San Diego and is frequented by tourists, Rancho Seco south of Sacramento, Humboldt Bay in Eureka, Vallecitos near Pleasanton, a quaint suburb of San Francisco, and Santa Susana in Simi Valley.   There is one remaining active nuclear plant, Diablo Canyon Power, located near San Louis Obispo – sitting atop the San Andreas Fault along the scenic beaches of California.  It is slated to shut down in 2025 when its license expires.   It currently provides just over 8% of California’s electricity.

Roughly 30% of all California’s electricity is imported, 30% of which had an ‘unspecified origin’.  Natural gas, including one coal fired plant, account for about 43% of their electricity, and renewables about 30%.  Most of the natural gas is imported via pipeline from the Rocky Mountains, Canada and the southwest given the state produces very little and stored in Aliso Canyon Oil Field.

The Aliso Canyon Oil Field is located in the Santa Susana Mountains –

In 2015, a break in the injection well casing caused a methane eruption that spewed 87.5 million tons of combustible methane into the air…   fallout caused 6,000 families to permanently relocate and 10,000 families were given air purification systems courtesy of SoCal Gas – the owner.  It took SoCalGas four months to contain the blowout and plug the leak after 100,000 metric tons of natural gas was released… creating what one might call a ‘fire hazard’ within a toxic cocktail of nuclear waste in Simi Valley’s Santa Susana.

Governor Jerry Brown’s sister, Kathleen Brown, is a lobbyist for the oil and gas industry and currently serves on the Board of Directors of Sempra Energy, which owns the SoCal Gas Aliso Canyon Oil Field

Neither SoCalGas or Sempra incurred any fines for this leak.  Sempra assets are valued over $56 billion.  To date it is estimated the cleanup costs will surpass $1 billion most of which will be covered by insurance.  A settlement agreement for climate cleanup was only reached this past August although it had not yet been approved by the state’s Superior Court.

Meaning – no environmental cleanup had been conducted prior to the Woolsey Fire.

California Wildfires: Land Management?

California is being devastated by fires once again, one destroying the entire town of Paradise, destroying homes, cars, and killing 25 people, a second fire rages in southern California northwest of LA causing multiple homes to burn in affluent Malibu and Oak Park.  A third fire has erupted in Ventura County.   They are truly a catastrophic perpetuation of California’s human and economic toll!

While wind speeds topping 55 mph have fueled the fires and rapidly propelled them leaving little time to evacuate, the cause of the fires has yet to be officially determined.   Dry, brittle groundcover, and winds have said to be the catalyst.

Within the devastation a fight is brewing regarding land management and fire prevention management. While the IAFF, International Association of Firefighters and the California Professional Firefighters Union have called out Trump’s comment that poor management has led to the devastation, there are facts that have been liberally manipulated to serve a purpose.

1)   Yes the Federal government is tasked with managing  a portion of California’s land, that land includes national parks, national forests, and national wildlife refuges. It does not include towns, cities, and metropolitan areas.

2)  While the IAFF stated that percentage of Federal land in California tops 60%, that is incorrect, it is 45.8% – a statistic they should know…

2)   Governor Jerry Brown has done little to nothing to mitigate the constant drought issues that plague California creating a continuum of environmental risk.

3)   FIREPAC, through the IAFF is among the top 1% largest PAC’s in the US, it is affiliated with the AFL-CIO whose efforts are predominantly political lobbying. They did NOT support Trump’s election.

4)  The president of IAFF is Harold Schaitberger who is also a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council created March 2002 by Executive Order.  Council Members of HSCA include Bill Brattan, a Democrat, appointed by Obama.  A former NYC Police Commissioner appointed by Bill De-Blasio, he is also Co-Chair on the CBP Integrity Advisory Panel, formed as an adjunct to HSCA by Obama in 2014.

Unfortunately, the California fire situation is political.

According to the UN regarding Fire Management:   “From an assessment of megafires it was concluded that the main contributing elements of these wildfires are drought, fire meteorology, accumulation of fuel and homogenous or fire prone landscapes, which are often caused by lack of appropriate land management. 

Preventive landscape management is therefore needed and should include policy, cultural, technical, social, financial, organizational, economical and market aspects. 

For instance, large homogeneous forests and housing areas shouldn’t be established in regions with fire-prone vegetation, but different land uses should be combined to maintain mosaic features in the landscape with natural firebreaks.

Special attention should be paid to timing of certain agricultural activities e.g agricultural burning should take place before the dry season and before the surrounding landscapes turn fire-prone. Burning should also be avoided during the high winds and hottest time of the day. At the same time alternatives for agriculture fires might be developed.

Local populations should be involved through participatory and/or community based approaches because they are often main actors in landscape management activities, they suffer directly from the fires which threaten their livelihoods and might also be involved in some of the fire causes.”

Bottom line – Land Management within towns, cities and communities should include drought control and landscape features including natural firebreaks.

Is improper land management the fault of firefighters?  NO. But Trump never attributed such claims.  So why would Unions associated with Firefighters even enter the dialogue? Politics.

California is host to roughly 4,000 to 9,000 fires every year!  In 2007 and 2008 over 1.5million acres were scorched.

In 2017, California’s wildfires cost $180 billion.  California’s fire budget is $442million.  The remainder of the cost, $179,558,000,000, is paid for by taxpayers outside of California through Federal funds and increased insurance premiums.  California’s budget covered .2% of the cost.

California has been in the midst of one of the longest droughts in history lasting since December 2011 and continuing according to the US Bureau despite Gov Brown declaring it had ended in 2016.

Over 95% of fires are human caused, including intentional and negligence.

 

  • January 2017, Governor Jerry Brown released his state Budget which included: Emergency drought spending. While recent rains have drenched California, the governor’s emergency drought declaration is still in effect, and the new budget appropriates an additional $188 million in one-time resources for drought relief. Roughly half ($91 million) is allocated to CAL FIRE—the agency dedicated to fire protection and stewardship of the state’s forests—to enhance its firefighting capacities and support the removal of dead trees. The drought has contributed to widespread tree mortality, which has raised concerns that the dead trees might fuel future destructive wildfires.

And what happened to the torrential rains that drenched California?  The water evaporated unable to saturate the dry soil, there were no reservoir projects to capture the rain, and runoff spilled into the Pacific Ocean.

 

          Governor’s Budget Summary:   Based on aerial surveys, it is estimated over 102 million trees have died as a result of the drought and the effects of bark beetle infestation. In 2016 alone, it is estimated 62 million trees died and millions of additional trees are weakened and expected to die in the coming months and years. These dead and dying trees make forests more susceptible to destructive wild res and pose public safety risks from falling trees for residents and infrastructure in rural, forested communities. The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) has identified high hazard zones within counties suffering tree mortality.

In October 2015, the Governor issued an emergency declaration directing state and local entities, as well as utilities, to remove dead and dying trees that threaten power lines, roads, structures, and critical community infrastructure.

The Tree Mortality Task Force continues to evaluate the most effective ways to
utilize existing resources to maximize the state and local response to the effects of tree mortality. These efforts include utilizing CAL FIRE equipment and personnel including foresters, hand crews, engine companies, and heavy equipment operators for hazardous tree removal and fuels reduction efforts.

In December 2016, CAL FIRE awarded $15.8 million in grants for a total of 107 projects across 34 counties to support local efforts to remove dead and dying trees that pose
a threat to public health and safety and projects that reduce the threat of wild res
to homes.  Butte County, where Paradise, is located received roughly $600,000, and Ventura County about $200,000.

In other words, Trump is correct.  California has done little to mitigate what the UN, CAL FIRE, and Governor Brown have declared to be the causal factor of these massive fires – land management.  The proof – to date there have been 7,579 Wildfires throughout California and two months left to go.

Harrison Ford: My Charity Is Better Than Yours!

There are literally thousands if not hundreds of thousands of charities across the globe.  The causes are infinite, and if everyone supported the same causes, the few would survive to the many falling away.  Such is the statement declared by Harrison Ford who has announced that  his charities are more worthy than everyone else’s because his are better, more right, and more more…   If you don’t support ‘his charities’ then you are a bastion to be beaten and whipped and pummeled if not by force, then by words as he did today to our government, in particular – Trump.

There is nothing wrong with supporting the environment and environmental causes.  But there is also nothing wrong in choosing to support veterans, the church, animal rights, or a host of alternate ‘charitable causes’. No one can say their cause is better than someone else’s.  And yet – they do.

I remember my ex-husband bashing my support of animal rights when he felt there were causes more important! The entire point of charity is to help steward people, the earth and all the creatures that God gave us – the animals.

No one chose to demonize Harrison Ford for his philanthropy, or his choice, however, he has chosen to demonize those who do not follow his particular venue of choice – and that is what defines the wrong of Liberal thinking today.  “If you do not do what I do, you deserve to be punished.”  It is the Hollywood narcissistic agenda.

To the best of my knowledge, no one has bashed Harrison Ford’s choice to support the environment, his choice to dedicate himself to his cause!  So it follows as rather odd, rather arrogant that he has made the unfortunate choice to bash all those who do not agree with his venue, and the venue of those scientists who espouse ‘man-made climate change’ as the force.   Because there is an equal and opposite force that – disagrees.

No one challenges Ford. He is passionate and that is commendable.  But shouldn’t he be likewise passionate about the charitable causes of others?  Charity is charity.  Right?  Or has even charity become a target for abuse and ridicule?

While I am passionate about the environment, I don’t subscribe to the notion that it is all man’s fault, nor do I think that anyone, any charity, is doing enough including stopping deforestation.   And that is hardly the fault of all us Trumpers.  And religious folks.  In fact, let’s take a look at who is doing the deforestation…

Recently, it was revealed that Harvard Law School supported such causes.  Hmmm, imagine that!

“The largest deforestation products are cattle, palm oil, soy, and timber. If you think about a hamburger, there’s palm oil in the bun, beef in the patty, and soy used for animal feed. The box it comes in was once part of a tree. ”Even in one product or one meal you’ve got multiple commodities, and each one of those will have had a very vast and global, complex supply chain.”

So every time you buy a beef meal from a fast food chain, you are contributing to deforestation.  I wonder how many fast food burgers Harrison has consumed in his lifetime?

Obviously, it is a complicated issue.   But blaming someone is absurd, blaming a group without proper research, is a nuclear bomb.   Be careful.

There are a number of organizations that have recently formed with the agenda of ‘stopping deforestation’, but their agenda is more aligned with public relations than actual actionable efforts.  The classic verbiage is ‘research’ we are going to spend billions researching the cause of deforestation so that by the time our research is complete there won’t be a forest left…to argue about.

Ford took his agenda to a frontal attack ‘stage’ when he claimed that ‘anti-scientist’ people are the root of the problem and need to be eliminated from public office.  Really?   Perhaps Ford could use a lesson in diversity?  Or tolerance?  Or inclusion? Or in research?  Or in science…  Because the scientific community is at odds.  And because the Liberal world seeks to point a finger in a direction that should reflect back on self.   His rant went further.  Instead of advocating for his passion and cause, he sought to demonize all people who are not on his agenda.   And that’s where he lost.

It is a sad world.  No one is allowed a thought that does not align with the liberal thought.  Censorship of thinking is thus.  And Hollywood seems to feel their ‘stage presence’ gives them the right to demonize and denounce and bash and whiplash with a fury derived from maniacal emotions.

The Paris Accord is a joke. It has ‘DONE’ nothing.  It is a name.  It is an agenda.  It represents the same baseless disappearance of billions of dollars on salaries and travel, that has people over the globe incensed.   They continue to spout ‘Plans’ to be instituted in 30 years – useless words.   Why would that cost $100 billion per year?  Can anyone actually account for the money already donated and spent and conclude that the money changed anything, cured anything?  It is a media hype and nothing more.

In the midst of the mix is the fact that Harrison Ford and his wife have cultivated a relationship with Bill Clinton and Hillary whose lavish lifestyle hardly fits the environmental dictum of ‘saving the land’.   So it becomes a modicum of hypocrisy amid a few sighs and slumped heads as we look at where the truth is told…  and Ford’s entire argument and passion are now questioned given that hypocrisy.

And so, as the drum beats, we take less inspiration from Harrison Ford’s truth, and more inspiration from the fact that he is simply promoting a Clinton agenda. The environment looses.  Ford Looses.  And the Agenda takes another hit.

Harrison Ford – Hush.  You are not the god of charity.   There are infinite causes that each of us pursue, all within the same realm of helping steward.

Hurricanes – A Seasonal Agenda

The WORST Hurricanes in history!  A product of Trump-mania.  But it would appear a bit of simple research would defy the logic quite quickly and succinctly.

Of the 30 worst hurricanes in American history registered between 1851 and 2006, 26 of them occurred more than fifty years ago.  That would be ‘before Trump’ for the mathematically challenged.   Two of the most recent that have been catastrophic include Katrina in 2005 which was actually a Category 3 when it made landfall, and Harvey in 2017 which was also a Category 3 at landfall.  The reason Katrina became significant was not because of the hurricane itself so much as the fact that the dam was compromised and ultimately broke.

Hurricanes have been a part of our history.  They follow a somewhat consistent cycle, most often affect the same locations, and are always incredibly expensive.  Except for one region that bears an interesting history.

Hurricane archives track according to:  Eastern Pacific, Western Pacific, Indian Ocean and North Atlantic.  The US is the North Atlantic region.

The Indian Ocean:  their storms are referred to as cyclones.  Hurricanes were not even registered or recorded at all until 1961 when they suddenly spiked and ended in 2008.  There have been -0- each year since.

Western Pacific:   their storms are referred to as typhoons.  Prior to 1949, they had no register/record of hurricanes, since that time they register more per year than any other region averaging upwards of 22 annually.

Eastern Pacific:  prior to 1949, they registered/recorded no hurricanes.  Between 2009 and 2017 they registered 71 hurricanes.

North Atlantic:  has consistently registered hurricanes since the tracking began in 1851 with spikes of 10 to 11 per year every 20 years on average. Peak years were 1870, 1885, 1893, 1915, 1935, 1950, 1970, 1995, and 2005.

While scientists confer on the way a hurricane is formed, consensus ends there as the global warmers vs the natural evolutionists have radically different views.  What NOAA charts do reveal is that the Cyclone/Hurricane season has peaked in September for the last 100 years.  And the intensity has not spiked.  By landfall, Florence diluted to a Category 1 despite all the ‘computer models’ claiming it would strike as a Category 4.

Hurricanes, tropical storms, cyclones are all an apparatus of nature that are powerful forces. Mitigating the inevitable would have a lot more logic than blaming – a person.  I suppose Obama was the cause of the 71 hurricanes during his tenure…?

Given that each and every year we are subjected to a ‘season of hurricanes’, and each and every year for the last 100 years that surge peaks in September, it is a rather bizarre media story to attempt to blame that activity on anyone or anything in particular…

Europe’s Fires = ARSON Or Climate Change?

Europe is under fire. Droughts have ravaged their agriculture. Heat waves have been intolerable. Satellite images show the entire landscape to be browned and dead.  From Denmark to Germany to France to Latvia, to Sweden…, the destructive weather has wreaked massive tolls.   The media continues to bolster the Climate Change phenomena as the causal factor, but in fact, it would appear that most fires could possibly be arson.  Most have occurred across numerous regions simultaneously.  And statistically, natural causes, or climate causes, account for a very small fraction, if any.

So what happened? Why?  And how will that affect Europe, trade and trade partners?

In Greece scores of what are termed ‘freak’ fires have left Greece in mourning as over 80 people have been reported dead, hundreds injured and entire neighborhoods in ashes.   The government has stated the fires were set deliberately. Three separate points were set on fire surrounding Athens in deadly blazes.

In Germany fires have broken out in forests, apartment buildings, refugee centers, a train station, a theme park, and all seem to point to arson.

Sweden saw 80 massive fires rip through in one week.  The media claims it is a result of the drought.  But a drought doesn’t ‘cause’ a fire, it provides fuel.  Typically, a person must set the blaze in order for the fuel to burn.   And like the California blazes, wind is a fireman’s worst enemy.    But to say that Climate Change actually ‘caused’ the fires is short-sighted.  It is no different than a gun being blamed for killing someone.  It isn’t the gun – it is the person holding the gun.

In the Netherlands, twelve bridges have been closed because the excessive heat has caused the metal to expand and thus make the bridges structural sustainability unsound.

Denmark is asking for $137million in aid to help devastated farmers.

Arson is huge! And All of Europe is on FIRE.

More than 500,000 wildfires are set by arsonists each year in the US alone!   Rarely is the arsonist discovered.  Often if he/she is discovered, prosecution fails as proving intentional arson vs stupid person arson is a difficult legal task.   When it is proven, sentencing varies by state and by destruction, with the most aggregious involving a death sentence if people die as a result of the fire.  In Oregon, a 15 year old was fined $36 million for arson… and told to submit a pay schedule if he couldn’t pay in full immediately…  Oregon is not known for its logic and rationale.

Today, protestors use arson liberally in their pursuit of chaos.  Liberal cities tend to have the highest accounts of protest arson including Berkeley, Baltimore, and most recently, in Portland when ‘anti-fascists fought anti-anti-fascists’ and anti everyone fought police.

So could the raging fires occurring across Europe be coordinated?

March 25ththere was a very disturbing fire in a Russian Mall in which exit doors seemed to be purposefully locked so that patrons could not escape, and alarms were shut off.  Of the 71 dead, 41 were children.   Was the fire a hit?  Was it a warning message?  To date there has been no conclusion.

News outlets are instructed what to report.  A war behind the scenes is quite possible given the disruption of the cabal’s inner workings.  With oil attacks in the Middle East going unreported in favor of articles highlighting the dress ensemble of Prince Henry, the world of journalism has truly died under a combustible fuel fired flame.

Could the fires plaguing Europe be coordinated acts of terrorism?   Theories abounded throughout the US over the last decade regarding numerous arson fires that devastated hundreds of thousands of acres each.  Blogs discussed the possibility of terrorism.  The media was silent.   The cause, the arsonist, never revealed.

Recently, the US announced expansive sanctions against EU corporations if they were engaged in conducting business with Iran.   Iran was angry with the EU for not coercing Trump to accept the Iran Nuclear Deal as is.  Israel is once again inflamed with Hamas.  The Saudis have decidedly snubbed Canada while continuing to relentlessly bomb Yemen.  And the EU is literally – on fire.

But little of this is found on MSM headlines.  There are various cores at play:   Ethnic cleansing in the Middle East, but more importantly, the Protocols of the Cabal in their century long pursuit of Control thru Chaos.  Ethnic cleansing for them simply means a lesser body to deal with when the forum is finally structured.

So why engulf the EU in flames?  What would be the message in the EU fires?

Given that fire devastates structure, destroys agriculture, and wreaks havoc on the economy, it is interesting that Germany recently unveiled tariffs on US agriculture.   In a war of ‘tit-for-tat’, if the July California wildfires were set to decimate US agriculture, and throw a wrench into Trump’s trade tariff win, the July EU fires may have been set in retaliation?

Truly, a political war outside of mainstream has been waged and set in motion for decades.  Read media headlines any more and they have nothing to say, nowhere to go, and routinely ramp up dialogue of mundane events that no one cares about.   But it is quite plausible backdoor wars are the real mainstream.   And the EU fires, the California fires, are not a mere coincidence. 

California Wildfires! Governor Brown Blames Trump

Trump Derangement Syndrome: a disease that medical experts claim is associated with paranoia, acute hysteria, and the inability to tolerate policy differences.  I wonder if Obamacare will pay for it?  Apparently, Governor Jerry Brown has jumped on the bandwagon claiming that his non-action in preventing California wildfires is really all Trump’s fault because Trump changed the climate. 

In 2017, over 9,000 fires burned 2.1 million acres, 43 people were killed, the cost was $13 billion, and 11,000 homes were destroyed.  So what did Governor Brown Do?

If Governor Brown was truly of the mind that climate change is causing extensive fires in California, knowing that California experiences thousands of fires each and every year, what exactly has he done to mitigate those occurrences?   Because it would seem that his methodology is to:   a.  blame Trump, and b.  ask for money.

“Forest thinning and prescribed burns — both of which aim to eliminate fire fuel before the fire occurs”  are the best method for prevention according to Mark Cochrane, a senior scientist at the Geospatial Sciences Center of Excellence at South Dakota State University.

Colorado and Oregon both have in place very specific and comprehensive strategies for mitigating against fires occurring as well as response efforts.  The vast majority of fires are ‘human caused’, either accidentally or arson.   Rapid response in these instances is essential.  That requires boots on the ground.  California has 885 fire stations.  Only 25% of California firefighters are ‘career’, nearly 60% are volunteer or mostly volunteer.   Despite the rabid extent of fires in California each year, they rely predominantly on volunteers and out of state assistance!  When all is said and done, the cost is not picked up by the state, but by Federal taxpayers.

Droughts in California have occurred throughout history, they are a continuum that dates back centuries, and despite a doubling of population since 1979, not one new large-scale water project has been built!  Hollywood?  Where is you outrage?  Where are your concerts to raise money?  Where are your donations?

“Because much of California’s water network relies on a system of pumps to move water from north to south, large volumes of water are often lost to the Pacific Ocean during winter storms when river flow exceeds the capacity of the pumps. This is further complicated by environmental rules which restrict pumping during certain months of the year, to protect migrating fish. In water year 2015, 9,400,000 acre feet (11.6 km3) of water flowed through the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, but only 1,900,000 acre feet (2.3 km3) were recovered into water distribution systems.

The state’s reservoirs have insufficient capacity to balance the water supply between wet and dry years.”

It would appear that neither Governor Brown or the states spokesperson for Fire Protection are aware of the above facts which is rather frightening given they are in charge of mitigation as a result of fires.

The latest spat between Brown and Trump was over the available water to fight the fires. Oddly, despite California’s ongoing battle with droughts, water rationing, and lacking capacity reservoirs, both Governor Brown and Briana Sacks, a spokesperson for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, claim there is ‘plenty of water’ citing Clear Lake.

Clear Lake rights are owned by Yolo County and are used for agriculture, local water companies and recreational use.  In 2014, it recorded one of its lowest levels of water after severe droughts at -.31 Ramsey.  It is heavily contaminated with high levels of Mercury and thus warnings are issued with respect to eating some of the fish.

But water rights have become the core issue for multiple lawsuits as the state of California began to declare a sort of eminent domain over county rights in 2015.  The state was attempting to curtail rights that had been on the books for a hundred years due to mounting drought problems so as to divert for state purposes rather than county or agriculture purposes.  Odd that Brown and Briana were not aware of this…

Therefore, when Brown and Briana Sacks cited Clear Lake as proof positive that California has plenty of water, their lack of knowledge was rather astounding.   The last drought period in California lasted from 2012 through 2017.

The ultimate point that both Brown and Briana seem to be missing is the fact that California wildfires are NOT mitigated, nothing has been done to prevent them, and nothing has been done to ramp up fighting the fires before they get out of control.  Nothing has been done to secure more career firefighters.  Nothing.  By continuing to do nothing, California will continue to burn.  By not providing adequate reservoirs for the population and it’s needs, California will continue to be plagued by substantial periods of severe drought resulting in depleted water sources to extinguish fires.  Pretending that the entire problem is Trump – is truly a deranged mentality. Ultimately it shows gross negligence and mismanagement… on the part of Governor Brown and his Departments.

The current Mendocino fire is the largest in history approaching 300,000 acres and just 30% contained.

Weather Manipulation: An Opioid Epidemic

In 1976, the UN created a treaty within which 78 countries agreed not to participate in the use of weather modification for hostile or military engagements which would have “widespread, long-lasting, or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other party state”.   States that are NOT party to the agreement would thus be susceptible to whatever military strikes and destruction party states deem necessary.

The parties that did not sign this agreement or signed but failed to ratify, include:  France, Mexico, Croatia, Portugal, Lebanon, Turkey, Bolivia, Holy See, Iceland, Iraq, Liberia, Luxembourg, Morocco, Syria, Uganda, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, Columbia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Guyana, Thailand, Cambodia, Iran, Haiti, Dominican republic, Bosnia, Montenegro, Myanmar, Laos, Nepal, and ‘most’ of Africa.

What the treaty acknowledged was the fact that weather modification was in existence, had been for some time, and as a result of its scientific breakthroughs, required ‘management’.  The Treaty states that the agreement against hostile use shall not ‘hinder’ the continued use of ‘environmental modification techniques’.

In addition the wording could be legally construed to allow for the use with debates over what constituted; 1.  Widespread, 2.  Long-lasting, and 3.  Severe.

Today, modification is referred to as ‘geoengineering’ and refers to solar radiation management (SRM) and global climate engineering.  Which came first – the chicken or the egg?  In the Geoengineering mantra, it is now unclear if global warming/climate change is a result of natural causes, man causes, or geoengineering manipulation.  Given that the tests have been ongoing for over 70 years, the trial and error factor is not unlike the nuclear tests of the 1950’s.  Let’s wait and see what happens when we nuke our military personnel…  My father was a victim.

Such is the ‘science of weather manipulation’.

Despite denying it existed, the 1976 UN document brings an obvious truth to what was termed a conspiracy theory for decades.  Given that we know that truth is in short supply within these various arenas, it would not be out of the ordinary to  assume that the evolution of weather modification has progressed most infinitely and is in fact utilized quite readily for peaceful purposes, and for management of nations that we feel need to be punished.   Albeit, in a way that might not be construed as ‘long-lasting’ – which has no legal definition.  Therefore, the punishment might be temporal, flooding that will subside, or a heat wave that makes life uncomfortable, except that we are now finding that even the most temporal change has cumulative and domino effects.  

But if no one admits it, if no one party states that they are engaging, the media will continue to claim it is all man-made and we simply need to reduce our ‘carbon footprint’, our gas consumption, our aerosol use, our…

One of the methods of achieving SRM is to inject billions of particles of sulfer dioxide into the stratosphere in order to deflect sunlight and send it back out toward the sun.  It is believed that this technique would cause widespread and localized droughts in either Africa or South America.  This particular methodology is currently inherently funded by Bill Gates and Harvard – the same Harvard and Bill Gates that advocate for massive de- population.

Coincidence?

Much of the initiative is defined as “Experiments” which are conducted in our atmosphere as a hit and miss, maybe, theory that we need to act on in order to determine if it works – and if it doesn’t then we have – consequences.  Like Global Warming and Chaotic Weather Patterns.

Apparently, as a result of these manipulations, scientists warn that stopping the manipulation is like a heroin addict going cold turkey, the likely reaction of the atmosphere would be catastrophic as it went into convulsions and withdrawal.

The problem is there is no corresponding methodone fix!

“If geoengineering were halted all at once, there would be rapid temperature and precipitation increases at 5–10 times the rates from gradual global warming.”x This means that stopping SAI once it had started could be more dangerous than starting it in the first place. Ozone depletion is another important side effect of SAI.

Furthermore, once SRM is deployed, sudden interruption would cause a termination effect, raising temperatures rapidly, creating a situation worse than it was before its deployment. Therefore, SRM will create dependency and captive markets.”

In other words, we created a monster akin to ISIS.  We can’t terminate what was started decades ago because it would send our environment into a cataclysmic state of chaos, so we are stuck.  It is liking weaning off opioids.

Weather Manipulation is an addiction.  So while the scientists that ‘experimented’ us to this place desperately try and claim that it is all man-made and a carbon footprint, the reality is that this same science is actually most likely the base cause of the chaotic eclipse that has morphed into a nanospeed decay of planet earth.

How the particles are injected is the source of argument and conspiracies, instead of the fact that they are injected.   And so, the truth is mushed into a legal advertising morph or play on words.  But the truly sad reality is the fact that we are now addicted to a scientific shitakestorm that began as an ‘experiment’.

There are those who claim that aluminum is one of the stratosphere ingredients in the nanoparticle experiment.

What does aluminum do to our body?
Aluminum is linked to blood disorders, such as hemolysis, leukocytosis and porphyria, as well as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS.  In addition, exposure to this unwanted substance can cause an increase in cavities, as it interferes with bone calcification and competes with fluoride.   Aluminum exposure causes brain oxidation and inflammation – while increasing amounts of the beta-amyloid proteins linked with Alzheimer’s disease aluminum exposure causes brain oxidation and inflammation – while increasing amounts of the beta-amyloid proteins linked with Alzheimer’s disease.

What you CAN DO:  Eat Cilantro by the fresh bunch, crave anti-oxidants, turmeric, purified water, sea salt, avoid processed foods, high doses of vitamin C, garlic and onion. 

So many of us opt to avoid all the vaccines which are rich in aluminum, but if our atmosphere is deluged, it becomes even more of a dominant agenda…

FYI: Don’t forget if they are actively injecting trillions of particle into our atmosphere that means our rain water, our ponds – are the highest concentrate.  Sorry.  Also realize that this means that Trump can not simply alter this course given that the proposed reaction would be severe withdrawals far worse than the current weather chaos we experience today…