Month: February 2019

Ocasio-Cortez: CIA Groomed, Soros Funded

Posted on by Helena

Numerous oddities and revelations are emerging from the very odd Ocasio-Cortez:

The apartment where she was supposedly living in the Bronx neighborhood that got her elected hadn’t been lived in for roughly ten years according to the postman and various neighbors. The postman claimed mail would sit for sometimes months before anyone picked it up.  Neighbors claim they never saw her.   And a neighborhood grocery store claimed they might have seen her once. Ocasio-Cortez refuses to provide her actual current address claiming her life is in jeopardy.

She graduated from Boston University College with a dual major in international relations and economics. Yet her bio describes her employment as “Educational Director” and “bartender” – after graduating.  An Education Director requires specific licensing and education requirements not attained by Ocasio.  Her bartending job was at First Fix in Manhatten, while she claimed to be living in the Bronx, a 40 minute commute.

Ocasio’s LinkedIn page lists NO JOBS.

However, on LinkedIn, she is endorsed by – Julian Jensen.  His resume is quite interesting.   He endorses the time spent together with Ocasio at Boston College, where according to his resume he received a degree in television and film.   Subsequently, his current resume is a parallel, albeit with extensively more intellectual gravity, to Ocasio’s ascribed “partner”, Robert Riley.  In contrast, Riley’s resume appears faked and simplistic and provides no picture, no contact information, and a website that is locked and blocked.

Jensen’s LinkedIn page highlights the ‘also viewed list’ which includes:   Ilhan Omar, Jared Kushner, Cory Booker, and Ariella Schwartz.   Ariella was an organizer for Ocasio’s campaign with previous experience at Netflix, Turner Broadcasting  and CBS.   Ariella’s viewed list includes Alexandra Rojas a coordinator with Brand New Congress. All viewed lists include a wide array of staff for Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, both of whom have been directed to embrace Ocasio’s Green New Deal.

The Republicans have filed an FEC complaint because a PAC, created by the remnants of Bernie Sanders Socialists, representing Ocasio made secret payments to her ‘partner’ Riley Roberts which violated campaign finance laws.    The PAC, Brand New Congress, on its website advocates for the reinstitution of the Marshall Plan.

The Marshall Plan was instituted in 1947 under Truman to rebuild Europe after WWII.   It consisted of grants and a small amount of loans that ended up costing the US $44.3 billion.  That would translate to roughly $468.4 billion today.   It was the institutions of Socialism, Marxism and Totalitarianism that the Marshall Plan fostered and supported.  Much of this was done through the CIA whose Directors at the time included:   Rear Adm Sidney Souers, Lt Gen Vandenberg, Rear Adm Hillenkoetter, and Gen Walter Smith.

The largest recipient of the CIA funds under the Marshall Plan was Congress For Cultural Freedom.  This organization was founded by Melvin Lasky, Nikolai Nabokov and Michael Josselson in 1950.   Originally funded by the CIA, it was later funded by the Liberal Ford Foundation cabal.   “Its stated purpose was to find ways to counter the view that liberal democracy was less compatible with culture than communism. In practical terms it aimed to challenge the post-war sympathies with the USSR of many Western intellectuals and fellow travelors particularly among liberals and the non-Communist Left.”

In 1967, after the CIA involvement Congress For Cultural Freedom was discovered by The New York Times, it rebranded itself as the International Association For Cultural Freedom under Shephard Stone.  Stone had worked in the intelligence division of the military and later for the CIA .  He became partner for the Berlin version of The Aspen Insitute and was a prominent Bildeberger.  Obviously, CIA involvement expanded rather than contracted.

The European Intellectual Mutual Aid Fund which operated as an affiliate of the Cultural Freedom organization was later merged with the  – – – Open Society Foundation.  Under – George Soros.

Cultural Freedom published numerous magazines including Encounter, based in the UK, which was funded by the CIA and MI6.  The editor of the magazine was Melvin Lasky who had also founded Culture For Freedom.

Encounter magazine was founded by Stephen Spencer, a German Jew who was a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, a poet, and a ‘described’ intellectual.   The concept behind the CIA’s Cultural Freedom organization was to harness far left Socialist Marxist Intellectuals who could influence society toward a belief in a fake utopia amidst a Marxist ideology.  They were dispensed throughout Europe and the US.

These artist intellectuals included:  Bertrand Russell, Alfred Ayre, Arthur Schlesinger, Ernst Reuter, Sidney Hook, Irving Brown, Tennessee Williams, Karl Jaspers, TS Eliot, John Dewey, James Bernham, Virginia Woolf, Richard Lowenthal, etc… 

Schlesinger worked for the Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the CIA.   A few of his closest friends included Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Henry Kissinger, various Roosevelts, various Rockerfellers, Kurt Vonnegut, Norman Mailer, Adlai Stevenson, etc… etc… etc.

Another notable ‘friend’ of Schlesinger was Ben Bradlee, Executive Editor of the Washington Post.   Bradlee worked in the information unit of the Office of Strategic Services/CIA which produced all the media propaganda materials.  His wife’s sister Mary Pinchet Meyer, was married to Cord Meyer, a CIA agent who was an operative instrumental in Operation Mockingbird under CIA Director, Allen Dulles.

What is being identified is an enormous power circle initiated by the CIA in collusion with a large House of Marxist Jews including George Soros to infiltrate and propagandize the US and Europe into a regime compatible with FDR’s vision for a New Deal that had yet to be completed, including Socialism and Totalitarianism, within the final phase of Globalization, Martial Law via impeachment, and The Marshall Plan reconfigured.

If an impeachment were to be successful and Pence eliminated, Pelosi would become the defacto President, and like FDR, have the Executive Power to put in place The Green New Deal.

If an impeachment is not attainable, the 2020 election will be rigged through the Electoral College elimination, Redistricting, which is already been tooled by Obama and Eric Holder, and illegal voting with the help of George Soros, or his son, Alex, should George die.

The manifesto was given rise by operatives in the CIA, MI6, and the use of ‘intellectual’ Marxists who cultivated a powered control via their writing, their music, and Hollywood.   Ocasio-Cortez was likely groomed by Hollywood, and despite her looney-tunes image, is backed by the remaining CIA Marxist/Liberals, Clinton, and Soros.  As such, Revolution has always been embraced by these Marxists as the means for instituting their Ideology.  

The Green New Deal: A Carbon Tax For Socialists

Posted on by Helena

Ocasio-Cortez has stated that mankind will be vanquished in 12 years.  Her New Green Deal has a time frame of 10 years to implement assuming it starts – today.   In the EU, they continue to establish time frames reaching emission goals extending to 2050 – 31 years in the future.   China really doesn’t give a rat’s arse, they just agree to whatever proposal is put forth, sign on the dotted line, and then refuse to actually comply.   What makes the Green New Deal so ridiculous is that it only applies to the US.   So the rest of the world will keep producing their climate change pollution, push out their goals 31 years in the future, and we’ll all be Socially broke or dead.

The Green New Deal states that the US will be the major exporter of Green technology, expertise, products, and services.  But according to her calculations, there would be no one left to export to because they missed the train and did nothing – so they would be dead.

Who wrote the Green New Deal?

The Media would have us believe that Ocasio-Cortez was the author.  However, her acumen would beg to differ.  In fact, Ed Markay, who is listed as ‘co-author’, is likely the frontrunner.  However, given the world of politics, I imagine they both had the help of some powerful prompters who hired the best writers to create this monstrosity.

What is not so headlined is the fact that the Green Deal calls for the implementation of the “social cost of carbon”, which is essentially a tax first introduced by Obama.   It is basically the same ‘tax’ that disproportionally affects low income workers and resulted in the Yellow Vest Movement in France.  Not working too well.

The basic concept of a carbon tax is that the increased cost will incentivize industries to find ways to pollute less, and incentivize citizens to stay home more and conserve.  A number of economists feel this tax will lower emissions while creating more jobs.  But there is absolutely no correlative proof that a carbon tax creates jobs…and despite its implementation in France and Germany, they have failed again to reach their stated goals pushing the date ever further.  What it does provide is revenue for governments to offset deficit spending or divert elsewhere.

Today, the Federal and state governments impose excise taxes on gasoline.  The federal tax is 18.4cents per gallon, while state taxes vary but range roughly in the 31cent range.   We are already being taxed around 50cents per gallon.   Why isn’t this money spent on ‘green stuff’?

Where did this tax originate?

The Revenue Act of 1932 incorporated the first oil tax at 1cent per gallon.   The purpose?  To help balance the budget deficit.   Over 86 years the tax has increased by 5000%.  That’s called government spending.

According to a report by Science Direct in 2016, $28 billion in carbon revenues are collected each year from 40 different countries.  Of that total, 27% is used to subsidize green spending in energy efficiency, the balance is allocated to a general fund and to corporate and individual taxpayers through tax cuts and rebates.   In fact, Sweden, the UK, British Columbia, Mexico, Finland and Iceland spend -0-% on Green Funding.   Australia spends 15%.  Germany and Canada are not mentioned.

The point is simplistic. The Socialist Agenda is always ‘how funds should be spent’, rather than ‘how funds are spent’.

Which companies reap the reward of the Green Funding?

According to a report issued by Friends of Science,;

“Since 1991, the Energy Foundation has been the main instrument that a network of influential U.S. foundations has used to define a portfolio of policy options, political strategies, and energy technologies to address global warming. It was set up by way of large block grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, and MacArthur Foundation, and supported in later years by the Hewlett Foundation, Packard Foundation, and other funders. The Energy Foundation’s principal function is to “leverage money in a highly concentrated pattern on behalf of policies that shift markets, industry, and consumers in the direction of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency practices.”

It should come as no surprise that the aforementioned foundations are ALL Liberal, Democrat affiliates.

Of course no Green Funding Dark Money scam is complete without highlighting Al Gore.  Between 1999 and 2019, Al Gore managed to amass a personal wealth rivaling Mitt Romney, pegged at over $300 million.  In 1999, his wealth was calculated at roughly $1.5 million all of which was inherited from his family.  His entire fortune was amassed through companies he started that mooched off the global warming scam.

And the Paris Climate Accord funds?  Those funds are predominantly shifted to spending in Africa whose carbon footprint is -0-.  If in fact Green Funding was Green, it would be spent on those countries whose footprint is the greatest – not the least…

When in doubt… follow der money.

And lastly, the media cites FDR’s New Deal as a compliment to the Green New Deal.  But FDR’s deal was the impetus that spiraled this country in a forever greater debt, a forever greater welfare, and a forever greater depletion of the middle class.  It is also noteworthy that the New Deal was implemented via Executive Order, because it would never have passed Congress.

BREXIT: A New Referendum?

Posted on by Helena

The UK’s Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn has announced that they would back a new and improved referendum to clarify that the people of the UK really don’t support BREXIT at all.  According to Corbyn, having such a vote would instantly erase the chaos that exists in the UK Parliament where tensions are strung tight, voices are loud, and insults are slung with the precision of an AK-47.

Short sided?

Obviously the ploy is to stage a new vote that will be rigged better than the last one to assure the ‘stayers’ a win.  Should that occur, the Parliament can sit back and actually do something of value to earn their keep.  However, it is a highly inflammatory move that could likely send the UK into an all out civil uprising given that the people are quite aware of the corruption.

In keeping with the illusion of fairness, Corbyn says that they will call this a ‘confirmation referendum’ – just to make sure that what was already voted on by the public is really what they still want because he is convinced that the last vote was rigged.

In contrast, Donald Tusk, of the EU Commission has announced that an extension of the March 29 deadline would likely be approved by all 27 member states in the vein of grace and goodwill.  YUCK.

At this point, Theresa May is watering down the BREXIT agreement to such an extent, that in all likelihood, it is no longer BREXIT at all.  Shadow Secretary, Emily Thornberry, went even further tweeting that Theresa May’s prposed deal be put forth before the public, and if they don’t accept it then it is a slam dunk to “remain”!

If it sounds like Blackmail, it probably is blackmail.

One of the major concerns regarding BREXIT is the impact it will have not on the UK, but on the European Union.  Not only is the UK a positive contributor, but with Germany’s growth staggering close to the point of recession, and France embroiled in a budget row excluding the demands of the Yellow Vests, who is going to fund the globalists?

What is interesting is the timing.  Theresa May has implied she will be stepping down from her role this summer.   If in fact a no deal is allowed and an extension is not requested or approved, May will go down in history as the cause.  If an extension is added to the March 29 deadline for three months as Juncker is hinting, that deadline would align with May’s predecessor taking over.   If May is just borrowing time, the resulting chaos that would engulf the UK would coincide with her quick flight to lala land.

The end result would be the sanctioning of the UK by the EU Commission, or an automatic remain injunction, both of which would send shockwaves and likely result in massive protests.

Given the Leave contingent are representative of conservative political ideologies, it follows that the Socialists are the remain.  Socialists dominate the EU Commission.  Germany is a highly Socialist state and Merkel has been at the helm to denounce any negotiation proposal brought forth by May.  Reconfiguring the costs that were born by the UK and distributing them proportionally to the remaining EU members will put Germany in the forefront to absorb the greatest proportion.   Given Germany’s economy has shown signs of cracking, the burden is enough to pull Germany into a recession.  And if Germany falls, the EU falls.

Hedge Funds are poised to react quickly to buy or short the pound, and the profits will revert to those holding the puppet strings.   But until the game is over, everyone is poised, hand ready to hit the red button – sell or buy…

Putin Threatens US With Missile Targets…

Posted on by Helena

The Media spin is most definitely eye rolling, but more provocatively angst is how incredibly misleading the story outline is regarding Putin threatening the US with missile targets.  The newest Russia allegation is claiming that Putin is threatening the US, and how should the US react?   Let’s take a look at what was actually said and why…

The scare tactic story is devised to further demonize Russia by the liberal left.  In fact, the US through NATO has deployed hundreds of nuclear missiles throughout Europe aimed at one principle target – Russia.   This military posture was heightened during the Obama administration to goad Putin into a potential defensive war.   Using eastern bloc countries, Obama systematically installed missile defense systems along the Russian border.   The provocation was obvious and Putin reacted emphatically denouncing the move and claiming it jeopardized the balance of peace.

Fast forward.

NATO and the EU Socialist blocs hate all things Russia and Putin.  The simplistic reason is because Putin refuses to submit to the same Protocols that have taken hold of parts of South America, Canada, Australia, parts of the EU and the US – prior to Trump.   The entire point of globalization is to create a one world government which is not possible unless you have subjugated every country.  Russia has been the most prominent holdout, and thus is the flagrant scape goat for demonizing.   Prior to Trump, the liberal administration was emphatically onboard.   Under Trump – not so much.

Recently liberal media outlets began the propaganda campaign of claiming Putin had declared strike targets against the US.  The media failed to ‘finish’ the quote:   “… in the event of aggression against Russia .”  Or: “State TV channel Russia-1 has presented a list of five US decision making centres that will become likely targets for Russia’s Zircon hypersonic missiles deployed on submarines if Washington decides to attack Moscow using its missile arsenal.”  If.  

In other words, Putin announced a defensive/offensive strategy should the US attempt to bomb Russia. To do or say anything less would be incredibly – well, stupid and militarily absurd.  Putin’s job is to protect his country.

Russia became a tremendous propaganda tool during the Obama rein of terror.   Every news outlet was instructed to virtually copy/paste articles seemingly written by the CIA under the Direction of Petraeus, Panetta and Brennan. Brennan was particularly interesting in that Obama claimed they “shared a similar philosophy”.  It was Brennan who oversaw the CIA investigation over the Russian/Trump collusion in the 2016 election.   I imagine that was paramount in their ‘shared philosophy’.  Brennan virtually drooled over Hillary.

Using the INF Treaty as grounds for the riff, the media ignores specific elements of the Treaty that make it completely worthless for the US.   The Treaty is only applicable to the US and Russia.   In other words, all other countries in the world can build and deploy an unlimited number of land based short and intermediated range ballistic and cruise missiles.   No one else is bound to, or a party of, this Treaty.  The Treaty was created during a time of transition, the end of the Cold War.   Today, both Putin and Trump recognize that it is ineffectual, dated, and superfluous in a very changed demographic.

Allegations of violations are a distraction.  The enemy has shifted.   And the Treaty needed to go away.

It is rather bizarre that the same media that claim Trump is in collusion with Russia, also claim the withdrawal from the Treaty by the US and Russia was symptomatic of the demise of US and Russian relations…   Obviously, you don’t collude with a country you perceive to be your enemy.  In fact, the media was likely fed a story line and the propaganda meme went full throttle.

The fact that the Treaty only applied to the US and Russia – not NATO, Germany, UK, North Korea or China… is clearly the main reason for the withdrawal from the INF Treaty as the US grows ever closer to identifying exactly who are our real allies, and who – is not.  And Russia’s statement that they will defend themselves against an attack – is simple juju jargon for all the misfits in the MSM.

Catholic Church – Child Predators

Posted on by Helena

The Catholic Church is embroiled in a pit of fire surrounding the ongoing, heinously sinful child sexual abuse that has permeated the Church for likely centuries.   This past weekend Pope Francis held a televised live broadcast in which the discussion of this rampant egregious deed was discussed.  And yet, the entire event came across more like an infomercial than a real self-evaluation repentant matter with constructive solutions.

1)   Survivors of abuse were ‘disallowed’ from entering the conference – it was a closed door event.

2)   Senior Cardinal Marx announced that files on abusers were destroyed.

3)   Pope Francis was aware of the atrocities and did virtually nothing to bring justice against his house of criminals.

How do these truthisms bring belief, faith, or hope that the Vatican is really serious about doing anything? Instead, it makes the entire conference look like a sham, a flim-flam media posture event.

Francis was installed as Pope, March 2013.  Over the last few decades there have been 2600 accusations against Priests in the US alone.  All of these allegations were transcribed, the offender was named, and a file created.   It would appear, the Church destroyed many files, meaning each successive Pope was aware of the allegation, and instead of bringing justice, they sought to destroy the evidence.  No evidence – no allegation – Priest cleared.

The conference was attended by just 200 participants…  mostly Bishops.    But in 2018, six Dioceses in Pennsylvania found these same Bishops were guilty of covering up evidence of Priests abusing upwards of 1,000 children.  So in essence, Pope Francis is putting these same morally convicted wolves in charge of guarding the chicken coup.  Obviously it has worked well in the past…

But even that knowledge doesn’t break the surface of corruption that was plagued the Church for ‘decades’, I would think it is more likely centuries.   In the late 2000’s, Pope Benedict XVI sanctioned Cardinal McCarrick of Washington DC for abuse allegations.  Two of the allegations remain ‘sealed’ from the public, others were destroyed.  And despite, the statement by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano that he instructed Pope Francis about the sanctions and allegations in 2013, Pope Francis turned a blind eye and repealed the sanctions.  Why?  If Pope Francis really wanted ‘justice for the children’ as he commanded the Bishops at the conference in Rome, why then did he repeal the sanctions of abuse on his own Archbishop?

But it is worse.  The Vatican and multiple Bishops received reports of McCarricks ‘transgressions’ for decades before anything was done at all.

The history of the abuse within the church was not even addressed by the media until the 1980’s, within the auspices of the Franklin Scandal, and the UK Jimmy Savile sensational story.  In both instances, pedophilia, abuse, was asserted against numerous high profile persons in the US and UK, including entertainment and sports figures, politicians, doctors, lawyers, and anyone with a lot of money to spend.

Like the Catholic Church pedophilia scandals, neither of these two scandals provided justice in any form whatsoever to the victims.  And in most instances, the victims were actually further victimized.  No one went to jail.  No one was sanctioned.   The stories were so high profile, so backed with $$$$ that to this day, one person was charged, Jimmy Savile.

To think that a conference of a handful of corrupt Bishops presided by a corrupt Pope would yield anything different, is like slapping Weinstein on the wrist and demanding that he write 500 times, “I will not ever do that again…”  With his fingers crossed behind his back.   “Pinky swear.”

Some media outlets tend to blame the Priesthood’s rule of chastity as their defense and justification.  And while their manhood might be difficult to subjugate, child abuse is not a normal evolution.   Pedophilia, is not a normal evolution.   A Priest, a Bishop enter the Church promising to uphold chastity as a part of their dedication.   If they don’t believe this is acceptable, there are numerous alternate religions that espouse Christianity that do not adhere to this particular conviction.  They have – a Choice.

One of Pope Francis most revered authoritarians was Romano Guardini, who wrote extensively of Christian Socialism.   Guardini embraced such philosopher’s as Nietzsche, Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle, who advocated Atheism.  Under his pre-Pope name, Jorge Maria Bergoglio, Pope Francis was not bereft of drudge and accusations, including his purported facilitation of the kidnapping of two Jesuit Priests during Argentina’s Dirty War.  These Priests were then subjected to horrific torture. Complaints were filed.  And despite one of the Priests coming forward and claiming the Bergoglio was indeed complicit, and not only reluctant to help, but allegedly involved, the case was – dismissed.

Why?

Money talks.

And so, this is the Pope. This is the Francis who claims that – now – suddenly – the children deserve justice.   This is the person, the man, the power vacuum that wields the whip of Catholic Doctrine and by default, core religiosity.  He sits behind the gated, walled, city of the Vatican that is guarded by the most elite soldiers in the world, equipped with infinite guns and ammo, to protect the men and their wealth who have confiscated their bounty over centuries in the form of art, real estate, stocks, and gold.  All the while telling the sheep what is real, what is truth, what is history, and what is – sin.

While living – the Dream.

Sexual abuse of children is a part of that dream.   It is a part of the history of valuing self above the law – even, the law of God.

World Leaders: Pussies Without A Clue

Posted on by Helena
By Paulschwartzmey
In Articles
Comments

Ronald Reagan was the last lion.

He radically changed the tax system, defeated communism, cut the price of oil by 60% and made the US the most powerful country the world has ever known.

As much I loathe Winston Churchill, at least he wasn’t a pussy without a clue. The guy at one point carried a rifle. He may have been a racist but at least he wasn’t a fucking baby. He smoked incessantly, drank scotch all day long and reviled in insulting his political enemies. God do we miss the guy.

Now, a US senator resigns because he put his hands over a woman’s breasts on a flack jacket.

Another is told to resign over a high school Halloween costume.

A German Chancellor can’t figure out why admitting a million male Syrian Muslims that can’t speak German might be bad for Germany.

A French PM can’t stop Moroccan hordes from destroying southern France. His own citizens tear Paris to pieces, Jews are run out of a country they’ve lived in for 10 generations and he hides.

In the US, politicians hide while high school kids are assaulted…

their school’s targeted and their lives endangered. Meanwhile, around the world, these same leaders cower from even the smallest problem.

The number of countries that balance their federal budgets can be counted on your left foot.

Even with a literal flood of money, these same governments can barely function. Welfare is handed out by the boatload, the people suffer from obesity, uselessness and diabetes and nobody can figure out why this is a bad thing.

And as people get fatter, lazier and more useless, the worldwide whining hits a fever pitch in a chorus of WHAT ABOUT ME!

The simple fact is,

If Vladimir Putin ran in any western country, he’d win.

The last President of the US went on television to announce his March Madness basketball picks while we were at war in five countries. He did an interview about politics on Comedy Central. And while the Navy Seals were killing Osama bin Ladin, he was in the White House kitchen playing hearts with “the body,” a man the White hired “to keep the President company.”

The President before him was so stupid he couldn’t pronounce the word nuclear.

On 911 he was reading children’s books to a grammar school class. During the Vietnam war, he joined the “Champaign unit” of the Texas national guard and learned to fly a decommissioned plane while there was a pilot shortage. Then he went AWOL and had it covered up by his daddy. His first major campaign stop was the Little League World’s series. He was given a baseball team and a massive middle eastern oil concession and couldn’t make money on either one.

America’s current crew of candidates…

include a slut, a communist, a spoiled, suburban socialist, a man who drew a grand total of 65 supporters at a border wall protest whose previous occupation was nanny. Then there’s a 76-year-old groper and another 76-year-old media “icon” who 95% of the population wouldn’t recognize in a police lineup. And to make matters worse, no one seems to know why a secretary of state who shared confidential information with people with no security clearances and took in $230 million in “speaking fees” might be doing something wrong.

Most of Europe is run by hedge fund managers for the benefit of banks.

They’re so inept they can’t even agree on what language should be used on bathroom doors. The only leader in all of Europe with any cojones’ is the 92-year-old Queen Elizabeth.

As I said, if Vladimir Putin ran for office in any western country, he’d not only win, he’d win in a huge landslide.

Thomas Jefferson once said that the people will end up with leaders they deserve. Let’s hope to God he’s wrong.

 

Cohen: Murder By Suicide

Posted on by Helena

Trump’s former disgraced attorney, Michael Cohen has been granted an additional six weeks spree before he testifies.   While the previous excuse for prolonging testimony was due to “Cohen’s health”, there is no explanation currently offered to justify the further delay. However, Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis, has given a glimpse to MSM regarding the damaging campaign that will be made public once testimony is actually levied: Davis has claimed that Cohen will speak to Trump’s “character” over the last ten years as witnessed by him in which the American people will learn firsthand of Trump’s moral compass when in the Trump Tower Boardroom.

Although all testimony would appear to be according to Cohen’s ‘memory’, and no evidence is available to support anything he says, the hope is that the media will portray this as evidence to support a Democrat run for 2020.

While Meuller’s Russia collusion investigation costing over $40 million and 2 ½ years forward produced absolutely nothing, the Liberals hope that this testimony will be damaging enough to sway voters away from the brassy Trump.

The obvious smear has been devised in private and would appear to provide simple testimony without any backing.   Whether that is true is a long guess.   But given that attorney, Lanny Davis, is a Clintonite, a regular CNN, MSNBC, Huffington Post contributor, who lobbied For Pakistan, was co-counsel for Stormy Daniels against Trump, who, advocated for both Hillary and Obama, and according to Glenn Greenwald, represented clients who he asserted were dictatorships, it is a fair guess, that his politics will rule his legal assertions.

The fact that Davis was hired by the Clintonites to represent Cohen should make one shudder. Not because of his convictions, but because of his ‘convictions’.

So how did Cohen infiltrate Trump in the first place? An interesting background.

Cohen married Ukrainian born Laura Shusterman in 1994. They supposedly amassed their ‘fortune’ through NYC taxi medallions, Chicago medallions and Trump properties but failed to pay their ‘fair share’ of taxes.   Ultimately, it is this lack of payment that resulted in the charges that landed Cohen to serve 3 years in jail, which would likely result in actually 1.5 years served.   It was Shusterman’s father who introduced Cohen to Trump.

Despite Laura and her father being in partnership with Trump, neither of them have been charged with the tax evasion crimes levied against Michael Cohen.

In essence, this all siphons back to Clinton.

And that ain’t good.   Because the Clintons love to spin and create and siphon and conjure until the mainstream has absolutely no idea what the freakin truth is.   And the agenda becomes all important, with lives, liberties, and family the toxic graffiti of blackmail.

In the end, the picture might reveal the truth behind Mueller, the eyes revealing his own fear, his own determination – backed by a threat, a possible blackmail of his own making.   What else could drive his obsession?

Most, within the Clinton frenzie seem to be fighting for their lives, and perhaps the lives of their family. And so, when we try and find a reasoning for some of the more adamant progenitors of fakery, it makes sense to assume their own vain attempt to protect – despite the truth – despite the demise of others. Their own weakness and fear ruling their lies and transgressions.

In some respect, we can feel sorry for them.   Who can say what we would do, given such a choice… what if your children were the threatened choice.   What would you do?   What if your wife was threatened with a horrifically painful torture, what would you choose?

And so, sometimes, when we look at the Meullers, the Cohens, the Stones, the Flynns… the bigger picture is what we don’t know, the threats that advocate harm to children and wives, girlfriends and acquaintances.   Should they not adhere to the Clinton dictum.

What would you do?

Would you sacrifice your family?

Murder By Suicide.

 

Tucker Carlson Meets A Socialist Narcissist.

Posted on by Helena

A 30 year old Dutch Socialist author who writes books on Utopia and praises the same Ocasio-Cortez ideals including; income for all, a 15 hour work week, open borders, and the elimination of billionaires through wealth confiscation, secretly taped Tucker Carlson coming unhinged in a segment of an interview that was not aired.    He then took this unauthorized surreptitious tape and posted it on public media.  While doing so would not appear illegal, it certainly bears the same Democrat/Liberal agenda of ‘leaking to the press’.

Bregman apparently thought it would be very utopiesque to release the choreographed tape to John-Q public via Twitter.  It was an obvious pre-meditated sabotage in an attempt to discredit Carlson, and demonize his show.  Baited throughout the interview, Carlson lost it, and expelled a slew of expletives. He knows better, but sometimes in this bitter agenda of hatred, a person loses it.  And that would be the only excuse Carlson could offer.

Bregman accused Carlson of some hefty demons, including the fact that Carlson has accumulated wealth, pegged at $8 million, and wealth is evil.  And apparently, like Ocasio-Cortez, Bregman believes this accumulation justifies a beating with canes, lashes, chains, and anything he can find to support his ‘Utopian Society’ wherein everyone is living in Paradise.  That is, everyone as long as they support Communism.

Interestingly, despite having authored 4 books before the age of 30, and having been lauded with prominence and recognition for his Socialist ideology, little information can be garnered about Bregman other than his writing, there is nothing about his personal life, where he lives, his net worth, his salary, his taxes…, his friends, or funders.   In fact, it could be said that he is ‘hiding’, like Sanders, so as to not divulge that he himself is a possibly a millionaire worthy of a lashing, a cane, and a shrewing.

An Ocasio-Cortez documentary fetched $10 million.   How much did Bregman earn from his four books, or from his history as writing for The Washington Post, BBC, and De Correspondent?  I imagine it is a fair guess, that his grooming has catapulted him into the millionaire class that he so viciously berates.

But he is emphatically parallel in his visions of open borders and paradise lala land as is our own airhead, Ocasio-Cortez.

SO lets have some fun and just play a bit with the reality of numbers!

A 15 hour work week making $15 per hour which is far above the average in the EU which is roughly in the $9.50 range, would mean a person made $300 per week or $15,000 per year.  In that event, a house price on average would have to be in the range of $40,000, a car would have to sell for $2,500 or less, food prices would tank, gasoline prices would be about 50cents a gallon, the cost of a haircut, alcohol, clothes, children, and everything else would have to be $-0-.

If all these things cost $-0-, then manufacturing will dwindle, supply will evaporate and a depression will result that will require FDR to come to the rescue and raise taxes to pay for the freebies that aren’t available because everyone moved to another country.

It was only a few decades ago that the cabal sought to indoctrinate us with the pop music culture of The Beatles.  They espoused socialism, equality, open borders, love everyone… until they began to make money.   Suddenly, they were making songs about The Tax Man!   They were denouncing their British citizenship where taxes gouged the wealthy, and moving their wealth into havens, protected from the nasty Socialists.

Bregman and Ocasio are the recreation of John Lennon, but instead of making them the pop culture anihillists, they are making them the political pop culture in a last ditch effort to rebrand Communism as “Paradise”.  Using young newbiles seems to be the trend.

And given that our education system has tanked to such an extent, many a college graduate have the acumen of an eighth grader, and Ocasio and Bregman would seem to have such degrees.  They know nothing about the Bolsheviks, nothing about the reality of Communism as it has continuously played out in just the last 100 years, nor do they seem to have any finger in the Dyke of Society, how it works, how the well-oiled mechanizations come into a sort of ecological symbiosis.

The problem?

The John Lennon’s became republican as their wealth ricocheted.   Lennon was executed when he ‘supposedly threatened to expose the deep state’. And Hollywood vamped on – like deer in headlights, what???  Their own intellectual capacity caught between porn, sex addictions, drugs, and fried brain=cells.

So.  Did Tucker Carlson lose it?  Yes.   Can a person who is capable of seeing the log in their own eye recognize it as such?  That is debatable.   Even the best would seem to judge quite harshly when their own eye is bleeding.

And I personally know – many.

 

Medicare For All! Another Subrogation By The New World Order

Posted on by Helena

Medicaid enrollees now represent 21% of the entire US population.  The Census Bureau estimates the US poverty rate at roughly 11%.  That would indicate that 10% of the US population is on the Medicaid Program paying nothing for a service they are not eligible to receive – roughly 35 million people, according to a study out of UC Davis.

As of 2016, the average cost of healthcare per person in the US surpassed $10,000 annually.  That would transpose to 35 million people getting the benefits of $10,000 in healthcare for a total spending of $350,000,000,000. Who is paying?   You and I.  These costs contribute to the untenable healthcare crisis in the US that is described as Socialist medicine.

Medicare was created in 1966.   Within four years the cost of healthcare immediately began to accelerate, rising 800% over the next 40 years.  As a result, Medicare revenue generated from an employee’s payroll now covers roughly 1/3 of the cost.  The rest is ‘deficit spending’.   Today there are roughly 30 active doctors per 10,000 patients.  In 1965 there were roughly 15 active doctors per 10,000 patients, meaning we doubled the number of doctors.

Therefore, the argument that the cost of healthcare is directly attributable to the scarcity of supply of doctors – would on the surface appear – false.

Medicaid was created simultaneously to provide healthcare to those who had need but no resources.  Medicaid is fully funded by US taxpayers through the Federal government – it is universal healthcare – however, those it serves pay $-0- into the system.   ‘Legally’ a legal immigrant may not collect on Medicaid until they have been a resident for five years.  However, in reality, Medicaid is one of the most corrupt, fraudulent organizations within the US government’s socialist system, implemented by Democrat President Johnson.

“Fraud, abuse and waste in Medicaid cost states billions of dollars every year, diverting funds that could otherwise be used for legitimate health care services. Not only do fraudulent and abusive practices increase the cost of Medicaid without adding value – they increase risk and potential harm to patients who are exposed to unnecessary procedures. In 2015, improper payments alone— totaled more than $29 billion according to the Government Accountability Office.”

But that isn’t the only driver of healthcare costs that are now anywhere from 3x to 8x that of other developed countries, and rising.  Why?

Simple supply and demand may prove the answer.

Over the last two decades, the Pac-man merger and acquisition of hospitals has been phenomenal, averaging roughly 40 to 140 deals per year that swallowed between 88 to 300 hospitals per year.    Less hospitals – less competition – higher prices.

But it isn’t just hospitals gaining traction, it is Big Pharma companies too who are creating monopolies that appear to be leading the sheep into a nationalized healthcare system whether we want to or not, wherein only One will remain.

During Obama’s tenure, there were 25 Big Pharma merger/acquisitions that were valued over $10 billion.   The purchasers were predominantly US and German, and the sellers were nearly exclusively US.

These consolidations eliminate basic competition allowing for massive increases in cost that is not necessarily trickled down to physicians, and emphasizes what would likely happen if the US were pushed into a Medicare for all scenario.

But it isn’t just Healthcare.

Between 2011 and 2019, there were 46 mergers valued over $20 billion each, six of those were valued over 100 billion, and the largest targeted for this year is valued at $442 billion.  This decade has accounted for more mergers than the previous four decades combined – and the decade is not yet over. 

These mega-conglomerate companies not only determine the price we pay for goods and services, medical care and procedures, they control the election funding, and thus the election results.  They control our media, and what we think, and they control the education that our children receive K-12 and throughout college.

For decades the reason politicians continue to enter office broke and leave office mega-millionaires is because they are ‘incentivized’ by the mega-conglomerates which are more than happy to make a hefty deposit into a Swiss, or Cayman, or Bermuda Bank account that can not be traced.

The Bigger Plan…

Whether the Protocols of Zion are ‘authentic’ or plagiarized, doesn’t really matter given that the content still defines the means by which an Order could gain control of the World.  In order to initiate the New World Order, certain pieces of the puzzle have to align perfectly including; control of the money – Federal Reserve System, control of the media – propaganda and censorship, abolition of The Constitution, elimination of religion, creation of internal societal chaos, institution of government and personal debt, untenable taxation, liberalism, introduction of greater criminal element – ISIS, Al Qaeda, and the installation of the Mexico Wall, the nullification of Education – college graduates whose education is comparable to an eighth grader, and the ultimate return to a global Kingship or Monarchial rule – (could BREXIT disrupt the UK Monarchy?)…

Control of the Healthcare system, which has already been done in terms of Medicare and Medicaid, provides two separate functions, subjugation of the people and elimination of those who are not willing to accept this right of passage of the chosen ones allowing the social order to be implemented so as to erect the throne.  In other words, submit or die.

While the actual Protocols are subject to controversy and uncertain authorship they were written more than a century ago and accurately reflect the evolution of the US, the EU, and much of the world and thus deserve to be evaluated from the standpoint that they provide us with an outline of what is being calculated so that we can combat its ultimate full implementation.

You can’t fix something you don’t know is broken.  And The Protocols give us a blow by blow insight so that we can not decry ‘ignorance’ because it has been thoroughly and concisely outlined for all to read – should you choose. 

To claim it is simply a conspiracy contributes to the illusion.

UK saysTrump Demonizing Socialist Democrats…

Posted on by Helena

The new Media Meme circulating throughout the US and EU is that Republicans are ‘demonizing Democrats as being Socialists, baby killers and anti-Semitic.   But, they are.  So it isn’t demonizing, it is reporting facts. 

Even the very non-independent, Independent UK Telegraph, has jumped on this rather bizarre twisted assertion claiming that Trump set it in motion at his SOTU address when he stated that America will not succumb to Socialism.   Of course, Democrat/Socialists are quick to point out that the US already has socialist agencies within its ranks including the US military, welfare, Medicare, and Medicaid.   And to some extent this is true, even Congress is socialist, they collect a wage for doing nothing.  But it is also worth noting who voted in these socialist programs and why.

Medicare and Medicaid are relatively new having been created in 1966 under the auspices of Lyndon Johnson, Democrat.  Since then the cost of healthcare has risen 800%.  Well golly-gee, that worked well.  And despite arguments that doctor supply triggered the rise in costs, the supply of doctors has doubled per 100,000 legal citizens in this same time period.  Well go figure…

Welfare was a part and parcel of The New Deal signed into law by Roosevelt, a Democrat, through Executive Order, bypassing Congress because, well, there was no way in tarnation it would have ever passed otherwise!

Congressional salaries didn’t even exist until 1855 when Democrat President, Franklin Pierce, a proponent of slavery, a lawyer who was sworn into office by pledging his allegiance to a law book instead of the Bible, effected a relatively lucrative salary to Congress which – stuck.  Only to be ‘doubled’ by Democrat President Andrew Johnson in 1865.  Halleluja!

Of course, the point of the UK Independent article was to ‘demonize’ Trump by claiming that Republicans are demonizing Democrats, and well, it becomes the Demon Party ticket.

Of course the entire article emerges as rather snarky and wimpishesque as it miffs about the bad, bad deplorables who are calling the Democrats Socialists and baby killers, and after two judo years of annihilating Trump – they just can’t stand suddenly finding themselves the – target.   It reminds me of Macron.

The fact that the Democrats have rallied behind late state abortion/infanticide, and increased Socialist agendas, seems to allude the author’s brain realm.  The fact that the Socialist organizations instituted in our government were done at the behest of Socialist/Democrats, would also seem to allude the – author.

However, I am left with One Socialist organization in the US that bears discussion – the military.

The history of an organized military dates back to 2700 BC, which would coincide with the development of trade and travel and borders, but most specifically Sumer (Iraq) and Elam (Iran) as they battled for supremacy.    Dynasties rose and fell according to their military aggressions, supported by their monarchial rule.   I suppose in that essence they were always supported by their respective governments.  But it differs in philosophy from the concept of Socialism in that they, the military, perform a very self sacrificing service for a small pittance of change – whereas welfare and ‘social programs’ are all about giving money to those who contribute – nothing.

Back to the UK Independent article demonizing Trump for demonizing Socialist Democrats.

The Alice in Wonderland Green Deal issued by Ocasio-Cortez was simply – well, Alice in Wonderland, and yet according to the non-independent Independent, it was endorsed by 70 Democrats in the House and 12 in the Senate.   Which makes them – Socialists.  Not sure why that isn’t a relative scientific numeric fact-thingy…

So we are calling a spade a spade, and they don’t like it, and instead they call it demonizing?

In the end all this reveals that even some of the more simplistic journalism isn’t even attempted by ‘journalists’ lest they discover that Socialism has multiple definitions – those who work and sacrifice for their wage – and those who do nothing and get forever freebies.   The Socialist programs instituted by the Democrats were created to dummy down the population as a whole, people were given handouts to do – nothing.  The military was created to defend, honor, and sacrifice their ‘everything’ for the people.  As such, the comparison is hugely – remote.

NOT THE SAME.  And I am more than miffed that this travesty of definition has been so morphed and spoiled by the Liberal/Socialist/Democrat individuals…  into a wimpy miff-faced, you hurt my feelings after two years of absolute hate filled chaos logged and lodged at Trump and anyone who supports our President, that the people seem to submit to the failed definition, including politicians who supposedly managed Harvard degrees despite their poverty upbringing!

How can that possibly be?   I think I’ll have to ask the Wizard.   Because, surely, only the Wizard could possibly know the answer…

POOHAH!