Black Lives Matter Protests

Protests coming to a city near you?   Knowing that every ‘peaceful’ protest right now has devolved into massive rioting, why would ANY protest be okay?   Knowing the business destruction, hospitalizations shootings, and police deaths, why would any protest be authorized today!   It is insanity knowing that each and every protest has ultimately led to full scale looting, fires, and complete chaos. And yet, here I am reading that my fair city will be the next victim as of today.  

Black Lives Matter has captioned a protest that will begin at 2pm and continue without end…   We have video after video of the resultant outcome – business owners attempting to secure their stores beaten, looted, and dropped.   How many innocent people must be butchered in order for Black Lives to feel vindicated?

According to the BLM website, their main call to action is to ‘defund all police across the nation’.   What exactly could this possibly accomplish? We can clearly see the lawlessness and chaos that has now consumed NYC, St Louis, Baltimore, Minneapolis, etc…   Police – STAND DOWN.

Do Black Lives matter? Yes!   All lives matter – but statistics reveal that it isn’t about racism at all – it is about behavior.

Each and every year the statistics are the same, blacks account for 52.5% of all homicides despite representing just 12% of the population. Is that racism?   Or is it behavior?

Given whites have a higher rate of death by police, why aren’t they protesting?

Simply providing the number of blacks vs whites ‘killed by police officers’ in any given year is a ridiculous statistic as it makes absolutely no reference to a crime or the circumstances!   Between 2015 and 2019, blacks represented 26% of police killings while whites represented 50%.   When adjusted for crime rates, blacks are thus greater than 50% LESS likely to die by police shooting.

The problem with any statistics in this realm of discussion is that a true representation of crime compared to ethnicity is not available.   Records do not adequately provide the ‘nature’ of the encounter.   The underlying factors, the crime committed, the circumstances, are not a part of FBI data.   Did the person assault the officer?   Did the person attempt to escape? What was the toxicity of the person and did the toxicity contribute to death?   Were they a gang member?   Where did the shooting take place?   What was the ethnic makeup of the neighborhood?

None of these factors are traceable. And all these factors are statistically relevant.

There are good cops and bad cops.   There are good black people and bad black people. Good white people and bad white people.   Claiming that ALL police should be eradicated has as much merit as saying all black people are bad.   It is a ridiculous statement.

What does a protest accomplish?   What does a riot accomplish?

Protests:   a form of physically voicing an opinion.   Does it change anything? Rarely, it is more of a placebo.

Riots:   a lawless form of destruction and chaos with the sole purpose of violence.   Victims are typically innocent.   Property and livelihoods are the target. Does it change anything?   It promotes hatred.

Who pays for the destruction caused by rioters?   Insurance companies may or may not cover the cost – some do and some don’t leaving the business owner or homeowner responsible.   In addition, any claim against insurance increases rates, even if the person was not responsible.   Ultimately, the victim pays.

What is the behavior mechanism that creates criminality?  

For the most part environment is the core – a persons values are a direct relation to their peers and parenting. The ever exhaustive means of fixing the problem has been ground out time and time again and yet its implementation has not. Why?   Because it means taking responsibility instead of exacting blame.  Blame is much easier.

The psychology of crime begins in childhood.   For some, gangs are essentially their parents instilling values and ethics.   Estimates range from 65-70% of black children live in a single parent household compared to 24% of whites.   The statistic is routinely ignored because it represents blame – therefore the statistic does not change!   In fact it gets worse.

Even Obama recognized the failure of black men to support their children emotionally is the basis of criminal degeneration.   “I believe the continuing struggles of so many boys and young men—the fact that too many of them are falling by the wayside, dropping out, unemployed, involved in negative behavior, going to jail, being profiled—this is a moral issue for our country,” said Obama

According to psychology studies – “father-absence was the strongest indicator of delinquency, even more so than low socioeconomic status or peer pressure. There is also evidence that fatherless children have lower self-esteem, a greater risk for mental illness and suicide, and increased risk of depression.”

So what will these protests actually accomplish to help pull black lives out of criminal behavior activity? What will ‘defunding the police do to save black lives?

NOTHING. Absolutely – nothing.

CDC – WHO – NGO’s Fighting Pandemics: Where The Money Flows

Why was the CDC so ill prepared?   Where has all their money been directed?   Why has the former CDC Director under the reign of Obama suddenly come out condemning the US response to Coronavirus?   The answers are inter-linked and tell a story of deception:

Ever hear of the CDC “Foundation”?   It operates as a charitable NGO that claims to direct and manage CDC programs in the US and 140 countries. The Foundation forges partners between the CDC and ‘others’ so as to enhance the impact of the CDC.

What – others?  Where?

According to their IRS form 990 – their grant making for 2017 was roughly $24 million out of revenue of $62 million.   NET Assets were nearly $97million – $70 million in investments and $40 million in Cash!  Not a bad take for a Non-Profit!

Where was it spent?   It is almost easier to say where it wasn’t spent – which would be the United States. The countries receiving the cash grant funds included; east Asia, Central America, Russia, Middle East/Africa, and Europe.   In fact the total cash disbursed in the US was $167,700 or .7%!     Of course they do provide ‘non-cash assistance’ to the CDC as well as other organizations in the US which apparently includes shared data, as well as assistance to the CDC in their quest for disease prevention in Haiti, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Tanzania, etc..

Non-Cash is apparently similar to ‘other’ – it has no specific definition.

Funding for the CDC Foundation comes from the same sources; Knight Foundation, Gates Foundation, Bloomberg, MacArthur Foundation, Kaiser, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Hilton, multiple pharmaceuticals, vaccine makers, CNN, WHO, US Army and Navy, etc… etc…

While the Federal government CDC claims to protect America from disease outbreaks – it works ‘globally’.   Money can be spent in Africa, but worded to benefit the US, and thus the grant muddies.

The CDC claims it spends $5 billion on free vaccines for ‘children’, Ebola and Zika prevention, opioid analyses, and $1.3 billion for ‘public health emergency preparedness’.   Sounds good in theory, but there are multiple agencies within HHS getting government taxpayer money for the exact same claims;   Indian Health Services, NIH, Health Resource and Services Authority, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, and Administration for Children and Families.

In addition, there is a Public Health Emergency Fund allocated $3.27 billion annually which claims to spend it’s budget on “Nationwide Healthcare System Readiness and Response” working with public – and private sectors.     The private sector is the – key.  It is the funnel, the laundering mechanism.

The Emergency Fund awards money to various pharmaceuticals through BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) to combat the threats of Ebola, Anthrax, Botulism, Smallpox and various nerve agents.  Smallpox?

While attempting to find who these CDC and NGO and government partnerships include, I came upon a page that lists Global Health Stories of successes by the CDC.   Five stories emerged for it’s US detail which listed malaria, dengue fever, Zika, yellow Nile, and Chagas Disease.   Thailand and South Africa seemed to be the focal points for CDC global health although 39 countries were listed.

In essence, the CDC is spending an inordinate amount of money outside of the US, and while we may be saving the world, we are NOT saving the US!

Where did all the money go?

The Health and Human Services Department was also responsible for the development and implementation of Obamacare.

The estimate was that Obamacare would cost $1.27 trillion by 2025.   But in fact, it is far, far greater.   According to the CBO, the NET cost in 2019 alone was $737 billion and expected cost for 2029 is $1.31 trillion.   Where would the money come from?

It’s FREE!

NGO’s are NOT paying for it.  In fact, we are as taxpayers in diverted funds from wherever there are funds available, as in the CDC and HHS, anywhere else remotely applicable!

Why doesn’t the CDC have the funds for preparedness and test kits as they are supposed to?   Why is NIH giving grants money to China’s Thousand Talent Program recipients?   Why are we diverting precious HHS taxpayer funds to 140 different countries across the globe?   Why is the US the largest contributor to the World Health Organization $4.5 billion annual budget – funding again World Health, not the US?

Among WHO’s list of achievements is the eradication of smallpox.   But according to the HHS Emergency Fund, one of their targets today is to fund the eradication of smallpox… Today, WHO claims their focus is – diet.

There are 14 separate NGO’s working to prevent Ebola.   In 2015, the Clinton Global Initiative launched a ‘campaign’ claiming they would eradicate all epidemics – in Africa, in collaboration with; Management Sciences for Health, Save The Children, and the International Medical Corps.   Funding came from USAID, Gates Foundation and the UN. Focus included Haiti, Tohoku and Nepal .  USAID and the UN – taxpayer dollars.

The circle of NGO’s fighting the same crisis is all about grant money, a laundering scheme wherein money is circled through the system amongst a select few ‘charitable’ organizations all claiming to make progress against some dastardly disease, only to spend the preponderance of funds on salaries and overhead. And a large chunk of that money has historically come from the US Federal Government – Taxpayers!

The cruel joke is that when Europe, China, Canada, Australia claim they are diligently spending funds to combat a particular crisis – likely those funds came from US Taxpayers! And when the CDC, WHO, and all the NGO’s within claim they are not ready for the issue they were created to attend – the likely reason is because the funds were either spent in Africa, China or Europe, or that they don’t want to tap their burgeoning ‘investments and CASH’ while maintaining their non-profit status and charitable designation…

And then there is Obamacare.

Project Veritas and Eric Prince: A Blackwater Connection of Legal Risk Management

Founded in 1997 by former Navy Seal, Eric Prince, Blackwater was an asset of the CIA performing services the CIA could no longer legally execute.   While Blackwater got all the attention, it was by no means alone in the “risk management” world of espionage and security.   Utilizing contract assassins was and still is big business.  Since Blackwater was sold, it has grown exponentially.

The largest risk management company in the world is the British multinational, G4S employing over 620,000 and raking in revenue of nearly $8 billion annually.   In fact, Blackwater, now called Academi, ranks 30th in the world. They do what government and military personnel cannot do, and they take the heat when something goes wrong.  But should they?

Sometimes the money is cash or gold under the table, other times it’s on the books, it depends on the operation and the need to remain seemingly clean.

Defion Internacional, based out of Peru and ranked 21st, makes no bones about what they do – Guns for Hire!  

Most of these firms utilize former special ops who are paid well to put their life on the line.   There is no pension. Everyone works as a contractor.   They get to work in all the elite places around the world; Niger, Baghdad, Kosovo, Kuwait, Bolivia, Columbia, etc…   What they are given is all the latest technology and equipment that our military is lacking.   But their biggest asset that lures the CIA as their most formidable employer is they are not bound by the same rules as our government and thus fly under the radar often.

Like many dictators across the globe, ‘they were our friend before the CIA decided they were now our enemy’, seemed to be the case with Blackwater.   In 2007 while hired by the CIA to protect a US Embassy convoy in Baghdad, the Blackwater contractors became spooked that they were being ambushed and opened fire killing 14 civilians while being pelted by Iraqi forces and Iraqi police.

According to the Blackwater guards, “a Kia sedan with a woman and her grown son in it was approaching the square from a distance, driving slowly on the wrong side of the road, and that the driver ignored a police officer’s whistle to clear a path for the convoy. According to this account, the security team fired warning shots and then lethal fire at the Kia. They then set off stun grenades to clear the scene. Iraqi police and Army soldiers, mistaking the stun grenades for fragmentation grenades, opened fire at the Blackwater men, to which they responded.”

At the time the US was at war with Iraq.   It was a very unpopular war that was instigated with bad intel and Bush was eager to deflect his shame. The total civilian death total was estimated to be between 270,000 and 600,000.  Bush desperately needed a scapegoat and he needed to assuage the Iraqi government by offering up sacrificed men – Blackwater Guards.

December 2008, the US government charged 4 Blackwater guards with manslaughter.   In 2009 all charges were dismissed. In 2011 all charges were reinstated. Eric Prince believes that the FBI investigated with the intent on blaming Blackwater despite tremendous evidence to the contrary.   During that time frame, Mueller was Director of the FBI.

Blackwater was sued and paid fines to the US government.   And in 2010 Blackwater was sold to a group of private investors.   Of the four guards convicted, one was given life imprisonment.   No other contractors or military officials were charged during the war. The CIA was not remanded for it’s mercenary hires.   And a mass of new companies sprung up to claim the rewards of what would continue to be called ‘risk management’ – guns for hire.

Fast Forward;   According to media reports, Eric Prince trained employees how to properly conduct investigative techniques and to integrate into liberal companies for the purpose of extracting truth on behalf of Project Veritas.

Dastardly?   No.  Illegal? No.

Industrial espionage? No!

Industrial espionage would include the theft of trade secrets for commercial sale, bribery, or blackmail.   By contrast, Competitive Intelligence involves gathering of information for analysis and marketing.   For example, it is relatively common for political campaigns to be infiltrated by persons from the opposing party.   Protests have often been infiltrated by contractually hired and trained riot instigators whose masters advertise on Craigslist.  It is a fine line that is pervasive throughout the world!

So why would the media target Eric Prince and Project Veritas?  

Because they are conservatives who have helped uncover ugly truths.

One such video that Project Veritas obtained was within the headquarters of the American Teachers Federation filming two union leaders making statements implicating them in corruption.   ATF is suing Project Veritas claiming:   unlawfully recorded private conversations, trespass, and fraudulent and unauthorized surveillance. One of the video’s reveals the rape of a 15 year old girl and the coverup by the Union and the School.

But New Jersey surveillance laws where the investigation was filmed don’t cover private conversations – in fact camera’s are everywhere throughout the state including in stores, retailers, merchants, street corners, businesses,  etc… Recorded conversations are not illegal if one party to the conversation is aware of the recording – as per Federal Law.   And Trespass is only available if signs prohibiting trespass are posted on commercial establishments and the party was uninvited.

The Michigan complaint against Veritas is also without legal merit.   Surveillance in public work spaces is ‘specifically’ allowed and employees are simply told to be discreet or be fired. It is only in a private setting such as a restroom where the surveillance could compromise nudity that it is illegal.

Eric Prince training Veritas employees how to investigate is hardly illegal – no matter who he uses to assist in the training. Using former spies, M16, CIA, etc… is simply utilizing good expertise!  Private detectives are virtually the same, and are subject to the same laws.   Training a person in combat techniques is not illegal.   Training a person in self-defense is not illegal.   Training a person how to conduct a properly executed investigation is ‘good business practice’.

Aligning them with President Trump is the demonizing factor because in the Protocols of Liberalism – anyone remotely associated with supporting our president is worthy of jail, gulags or death.

BLOOMBERG: The Trojan Horse?

Bloomberg is suddenly emerging in the polls…. Rising from a factor of -0- to a sudden surge of 19%!   Amazing…   Or fabricated?

The latest to acknowledge this tremendous lead was conducted by: NPR, PBS News Hour and Marist.   Sounds prestigious, but when analyzing the methodology employed, a completely obscured bias is immediate clear.   The respondents numbered about 1400, 73% Democrat and 27% Independent leaning Democrat.   And then it breaks down completely:   61% were women, Midwesterners were negligible, Christians were virtually nonexistent, city folk dominated, roughly 250 polled are not registered to vote, and 65% under the age of 60.   The actual states polled is not listed or identified.   And the margin of error is a whooping 5.4%.

Ethnicity includes an over majority of 20% Black, and 11% “Other”.

In other words, the poll does not even remotely parallel the demographics of the US.

What it does do is allow Bloomberg to appear as though he has a following – when in reality – he doesn’t.   It also allows him the privilege of entering the debates. A factor, he undoubtedly – paid for.

The Poll was conducted with the expertise of Luce Research based out of Colorado Springs.   Luce has the dubious honor of boasting a 1 star rating… on a good day.   Employee reviews include such statements as the company works ‘illegally’, Disorganized, uncomfortable surveys…, scum management, and quota driven.   In other words, the company operates to secure a pre-determined result.

So what is the point of boosting Bloomberg artificially?

Likely to detract from the other surge – Bernie Sanders, a self proclaimed Socialist/Communist.

Bernie was not the agenda in 2016, nor is he the democrat agenda in 2020.   Hillary managed to buy off the DNC so as to squeeze out Bernie then, it is likely Bloomberg is being used for the same purpose.   Although he wasn’t the chosen candidate, money talks, and Bloomberg is the god of money.

So if Bloomberg’s only usefulness is to squeeze out Sanders, what is in it for him?   He certainly doesn’t have nearly the following as President Trump.   And buying a fake poll doesn’t win the voters.

The Trojan Horse Clinton is looking less and less viable with the threat of coming legal revelations.   Could they be that self obsessed that they don’t see their ultimate downfall and demise?   Trump has routinely distracted them from the true agenda, and despite history, each and every time; they seem to fall into the shroud.

As I have ventured in previous posts, given George Soros has been the puppet master, and given his dementia is highly likely with his advanced age, could it really be that they are simply operating on the hem-tails of insanity?

What happens when the puppet master – dies?   Supposedly, his son takes over, but a son is not his father, and this certainly plays in the saga of George Soros who lived life as a Nazi heretic.

By contrast, George’s sons and daughter grew up privileged, sheltered, without the degree of hatred obviously bred into his soul.

While they possess his hatred – it is not born of the absolute disintegration of humanity.

While the interesting notion is promulgated that Bloomberg is spending his own money, to the tune of $100million, and counting, the idea that these funds will not be recompensed with interest is highly unlikely.   A man, who covets nothing but wealth, does not spend without knowing he will be rewarded two to ten fold. The likes that that recommendation would come from such constituents as “Stacey Abrams”, is laughable. So the question begs – Who?

An interesting amalgam is revealed; Judge Judy, Warren Buffett, Leon Cooperman, and a handful of ‘mayors’… In essence – no one.   While he can pay government officials to endorse him, actually gaining the support of the people is not quite as easy.

As such a plethora of negative commentary has recently hit the media airwaves in which Bloomberg literally destroys himself as a potential candidate.   He has effectively eliminated the Midwest entirely, farmer entirely, women, Christians, blacks, and anyone whose main life purpose is NOT money. Therefore, can we conclude, he isn’t so much a candidate per se, as a distraction and deviation from the Marxist regime promulgated by the only other alternative – Bernie Sanders?

Certainly, every member of Wall Street, every business and working individual throughout the entire US is aware of the cataclysmic effect a Bernie Sanders would have on the US, and the World… now if we could simply re-educate our children …  

Environmental Pollution: A Catastrophe of Decades

Where are all the charities tackling global pollution?   When I was growing up, pollution, the environment, and saving the whales were the calls to action!   Decades later, billions of dollars later, thousands upon thousands of charities later, what has been accomplished?

I recently saw a meme on Facebook that made a frivolous statement that going green, cleaning the environment, cutting carbon emissions, neutralizing our pollution would all be beneficial gains.   True.   Somewhat.   So what?   Rallies and protests, federal funds, grants, billions from concerned citizens, and what has happened?

According to the UN, land based agricultural run-off, discharge of nutrients and pesticides and untreated sewage including plastics account for approximately 80% of marine pollution, globally. Great!   Who is doing anything to mitigate this?

Apparently – no one – not any country on earth. Not the NGO’s, not Greenpeace or WWF, or any of the hundreds upon hundreds of NGO’s that have reaped billions on sympathy.

According to the UN, there are now close to 500 dead zones covering more than 245,000 km² globally, equivalent to the surface of the United Kingdom. Is that diminishing? Hardly.   China, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines dump more plastic in our oceans than the rest of the world combined. Has that statistic changed? Yes. It has grown!

While the Greta’s of the world would demonize developed countries for their global warming footprint, what are they doing to alter the pollution that has grown unabated for a hundred years?   Global warming is simply the new – NEW.   It is a fashion statement.   And in a decade it will be replaced with another fashion statement in which charities demand more funding to alleviate another crisis that will never be dealt with because all the money goes to pay salaries and administrative expenses to demean The People.

If an NGO was truly about their cause, wouldn’t there have been a positive impact these last 50 years?   Has whaling decreased?   Are our oceans less polluted?   Does China have non-mask days?   Remember the Animas River in Colorado that was completely devastated due to negligence by the EPA?

Everyone is about the talk – but who is actually ‘acting’?

“Talk the talk, walk the walk”.

Europe and the western greens were aghast when President Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord. “How dastardly!”   But what has the accord actually accomplished?   Have they altered the output of Germany’s pollution? No.   China’s? No. France?   UK?   Japan? What they have done is redirect funds to Africa which has -0- carbon footprint, for the purpose of constructing an infrastructure system that will help the transportation of palm oil – to Europe.   Ahhh!

And then, there is the factual calamity that many if most of those who scream the loudest are among the largess of polluters. Jane Fonda is notorious for her own carbon footprint while screaming, “it’s not my fault – they are guilting me!” So if it isn’t her fault – then whose fault is it?   Bill Gates?   Bloomberg?   Obama?   Buffett? Has Jane Fonda’s protests changed anything? Has she lowered her carbon footprint?   Or, is it the continuum of finger pointing?

The garbage that floats in island patches throughout our oceans has grown exponentially.   Teams of NGO’s have commissioned studies and research and evaluations for decades, spending billions to determine existence….   One such project included The Ocean Voyage Institute which claims it has removed 84,000 pounds of polymer nets and plastic trash.   One patch alone is estimated to contain 80,000 metric TONS – 1.8 trillion pieces.

Yet no one seems to acknowledge this travesty of growth that can be trajected to every single city, country, continent and government dating for at least 5-6 decades.

So.   To address the meme. Would a clean environment, wherein there were no polluter, no arsonists, no travesties, be better for our environment? The answer is a resounding – YES!   But the solution is pathetic.   It starts with you! Each individual! Including Jane Fonda.   It means no more pampers.   It means no more wipes.   It means no more water bottles.   It means no more electricity in ‘elite compounds’, it means shutting down office lights, it means no more superfluous air flights – say once a year…   It means eliminating yachts.   It means no glyphosate. It means organic farming. It means so much more than most are willing to actually – do. Oops.   It means planting trees, not having wood floors, it means no more paper, it means deescalating city growth which is a cement paradise.

You want to talk the talk? Then you need to walk the walk!

It isn’t about a President.   It is about – YOU!

EPSTEIN & SOROS: Legalize Prostitution to Save Child Trafficking…

In the midst of the Jeffrey Epstein sexual assault and pedophilia revelations that ensnare hundreds if not thousands of high profile people, Soros and his NGO’s are busily advocating for decriminalization of sex work throughout Africa, the US and South America.

One citation used Rhode Island to support the idea claiming that rape had been lowered significantly.   Prostitution was legal in Rhode Island between 1990 and 2009. During that time rape hit an all time peak in 2003 topping 505 reported cases.

Like gun laws, there appears to be absolutely no correlation, nothing to prove that legalizing the sex trade will have any positive impact on rape – and certainly not sex trafficking.

In the US, the average age of a girl entering street prostitution is – 12!   Children account for 36% of sex trafficking.   1.5 million children are trafficked every year. In 2007, Germany identified 689…crumbs.   Germany is considered a hub for bringing trafficked children to be ‘redistributed’, and for providing sexual prostitution.  Why? Because prostitution is legal and thus provides backdoors.

The UN is continually found to be complicit and yet there is no ramification.

So how will legal prostitution change that?

Epstein and his entourage were prime examples. They did not seek out prostitutes. They sought underage girls. Pedophilia is what they want. No one wants an over-used prostitute – they want young nubiles, virgins!   They want the girl to cry, to be petrified, to fear!   The Epstein’s in this world, and there are likely millions, don’t want a rough prostitute, they want angelic, they want domination over someone who cannot say ‘no’.

Wake up!

Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador are prime locations for abducting girls and boys for trafficking. Why? Because their parent’s sell them. Because poverty precludes sanity.   Because they can. These children are then exported to the US, the EU, and Canada.  The younger, the more valuable.

Rani Hong was abducted from his home in India at the age of 7 and sold to a couple in Canada under the guise of an ‘illegal adoption’.   In reality, he was their slave for anything and everything they demanded.   He didn’t go to ‘school’.   He didn’t have a life.

Legalizing prostitution would have zero impact on his life or the 1.5 million children trafficked each year.

After Germany legalized prostitution, according to Dr. Kraus, it has been disastrous.   Men no longer have any boundaries, there is no line drawn, and the assaults have escalated against prostitutes who are now seen as chattel, or worse.  In her words, prostitution is not about ‘sexual liberation’ as the left would have us believe, it is about money, pure and simple.   She provides statistics that in Germany a prostitute must ‘serve’ six men a day just to break-even in expenses.

And just as the mass immigration from Latin America was largely predicated on providing children for traffickers in the US, Germany’s mass immigration from Africa was likely a similar agenda. The difference? Merkel encouraged it and little to nothing is done to mitigate it.

So what would be accomplished by the Soros agenda for legal prostitution?

A market would be legitimized.   That would hugely expand the territory, and the $$$$.   But it would also open the door to lax oversight.   Twelve year old girls could be masked. And in reality it would likely increase sex trafficking, particularly of minors, given they represent the biggest money.  In reality, money is the only real game. In the world of Epstein, prostitution in ‘young people’ was justifiable.

When advertising legalized prostitution, the justification will remain ‘who is too young to matter’.     Given the market for young girls, and the fact that fake ID’s are a dime a dozen, and backrooms can easily house different tastes, given that the front door would now be ‘legal’, police would likely have little ability to even get a viable search warrant.

Decriminalizing prostitution has been shown to create an uptick in human trafficking given the age old phenomena of supply and demand. Demand would increase and the chattel would need replenishing.   Germany is a prime example. Prostitution was legalized and brothels needed slaves. They brought them in from India, Romania, and the Philippines.   According to a recent article in DW, “German customers can rent a child in the Philippines for an hour, who then has to do whatever they want in front of a webcam.”

It is estimated that modern slavery is a multi-billion dollar business ranking 3rd largest in the world and representing over 40 million victims.   And yet, somehow in the US we’re still debating and accusing white people of slave ownership dating 200-300 years ago by some possible distant relative – as in my fifth cousin 100 times removed. And in so doing, the real problem that exists today gets no attention, no grief, and no media.

Epstein and his entourage were pedophiles. But they could have simply gone to legal brothels… right?   They could have paid prostitutes.   But that’s not what they wanted.  

Democrat Presidential Candidates: sortof

The Democrat Party has sorta-kinda turned itself into fodder for every comedian. With 21 ‘major’ candidates, there are an additional 200 candidates who have filed appropriate FEC paperwork declaring their candidacy, and five who are still sitting on the fence. There are so many candidates the DNC isn’t exactly sure how to conduct debates.   All Democrats candidates have fiercely stated they will not attend a debate hosted by Fox News, and currently CNN and NBC are the ticketed sponsors.

Surprise!

In order to qualify for the debate there are two threshold criteria: 1.   Attain a minimum of 1% approval based on three approved official polls, and 2.   A candidate must receive donations from a minimum of 65,000 unique donors, with at least 200 unique donors per state in at least 20 states.

In addition, private sponsors are hosting ‘forums’ in which only select candidates will debate. For example, Texas University is hosting “She The People” to discuss issues affecting women of color. The agenda includes Corey Booker, Julian Castro, Gabbard, Harris, Klobuchar, Beto, Sanders and Warren.   Thus, one woman of color is included in a debate about women of color.

Castro, Klobuchar and Warren are invited to attend all scheduled Forums.

To date the Democrat polls indicate that Biden is leading with 34%, Sanders 26%, Buttigieg and Harris each hold 9%, Booker and Warren at 5%, Beto 4% and Bullock 1%.

In that it would appear that the race is between Biden and Bernie and the rest are fudgemutton. Rumors are already rampant that the DNC is doing what it does best – deleting Bernie.   Ed Rendell, Chairman of the DNC is an avid Biden supporter who has also commented positively about Amy Klobuchar, leaving an opening for her to potentially be called in as a Biden VP.

Klobuchar, a lawyer, a feminist, accused of unprecedented rage by her office wherein staffers claim she utilizes fear, anger and shame to administrate, with a 36% staff turnover rate – is likely to be seen as a bit over the top. And like nearly all politicians, in 2015 she published her memoire.

Some of her endorsements are rather interesting including; Palestinian Rights, NAACP, Planned Parenthood, and various unions.

Both Klobuchar and Biden met in February with Hillary, purportedly to gain insight into campaigning and mud-slinging.   In addition, her campaign financing includes Soros’ son Alex.   As of 12/31/18, she had raised $5.2 million with top contributors from her former law firm Dorsey and Whitney, Delta Airlines, Cargill, and Walt Disney as well as $3 million left over from her Senate campaign. Still her financing is significantly less than her competitors. However given the sheer number of candidates, financing is likely to dry up quickly until the field is cleaned. Roughly $60 million has been handed out so far with Gillibrand and Booker also sitting on Senate campaign financing that could be transferred to the presidential run – or not.

While the media tends to liken a candidates campaign financing with their ‘win’, history has shown this false narrative to fail. Hillary spent nearly twice as much as Trump – and lost. The senate race between Beto and Cruz was one of the priciest campaigns ever and yet Beto lost after raising significantly more money, more than twice Cruz.

Klobuchar seems more hillaryesque than the other dutiful Clintonite, Kamala Harris. When seen together, Harris seems to become a wall-flower by comparison.   Both are attorneys, both have a history of prosecuting and sentencing a disproportionate number of blacks, and both have the filter of a bull in a china shop.

If Biden were to debate either of these candidates, the cabal would surely order a stand-down to allow Biden to shine despite his unsavvy economic and political knowledge base. Brash and bullyish, they could easily make mincemeat of him. Unless ordered not to.   It will be easy to recognize given their lawyerly talents.

Trump’s China Trade War – The Facts

The Federal Reserve and the World Bank at the behest of a handful of economists who are decidedly left leaning have published two scathing reports which claim that Trump’s trade war with China is costing US taxpayers upwards of $68 billion annually.

Of course the statements are biased. Of course they represent an agenda and potential fodder. If they are true.

Economists are an interesting breed. They sit in glass houses and create a conclusion without seeming to have a basic understanding of real world business and tend to adamantly disagree with each other on a broader scale while presenting a portion of the facts.

Somewhat like the climate change fiasco.

Trades are business contracts. They may be executed as a one-time transaction, transactions that occur over a series of months, and often are transactions that are locked years.   They take time to execute. Terms are pre-determined. Terms are re-negotiated.

These ‘Economists’ have made a determination based on data that is virtually impossible to track. In addition, their supposition ‘estimates’ an annual cost. But even that is wholly unreliable because the Tariffs were imposed over the course of several months in 2018, with intellectual property, aluminum and steel at the forefront.   They effectively began in July and phased in over a number of months.

China’s “implemented and ‘proposed’ tariffs” would affect $110 billion of imports. That does not mean the US exports stop. It means they will be levied a tariff which will effect the profit margin.

The economist’s reports both extrapolate the outcome as an annual loss. A year has not yet occurred.   In fact, there is only two months of trade numbers in 2019 to analyze. Certainly one can extrapolate based on previous data… right? Yes and no.

It is like a poll wherein a random sample of 1000 Democrats all residing in New York are sampled and the results will determine the US Presidential election…

Example:   During Obama’s reign trade data is available on a monthly basis.   At the end of 2008 when Obama came into office, the US trade deficit with China was roughly $268 billion.   By the end of 2016 when Obama left office, it was $347 billion. Before any tariffs had any measurable impact, by the end of 2017 the deficit had climbed to $375 billion.

This ‘non-important’ deficit has climbed every single year since it began in 1986. Since 2000, it has quadrupled. And not one sitting President did a damn thing.

Suddenly, with two measurable months of data available for 2019, the media is calling Trump’s trade war a calamity.

In actuality, the value of imports for January and February of 2019 were down 10% and 20% respectively compared to the previous year – before any tariffs were imposed.

Lets look at another trading partner – Germany.

When Obama came into power that deficit was roughly $28 billion. By the time Obama left office that deficit had spiked to nearly $65 billion. It torched at $68 billion by the end of 2018, well before Trump’s tariffs took effect. The first two months of 2019, the deficit had lowered nearly 10%.

Even in the world of an Economist, 2 months is clearly not enough of a data set to make any conclusion or opinion.   And yet they do. Why?

Obviously it is an attempt to discredit Trump and provide fodder for Democrats who are bent on finding fodder because they are frustrated with the incorrigible corruption, instead of truth.

What this also reveals is the larger picture in which both the US Federal Reserve and the World Bank are colluding in this massive demonization of all things Trump.     It also reveals that these institutions have provided absolutely no guidance or stipulations or concern for the annual increase in US trade deficit for the last 30 years.

Which technically is a reflection on their incompetence. Economic Policy is their mainstay. Their existence. So obviously they did not have the US in their sights for at least 30 years.

Why?
1) According to it’s own website, the World Bank’s field of study is on ‘Developing Countries’.   So why did they commission a report on Trump’s China trade – two well developed countries outside of the scope of their jurisdiction?

2) The second part of these reports claims that US agriculture farms have been hit hard by Trump’s tariffs.   But the agriculture business isn’t the mom and pop farm of a hundred years ago. Mainstream media have been sounding the alarm on the changing face of farms for a decade or two.

Statistics: Most small farms are ‘hobby farms’.   Tax incentives during the Bush and Obama years gave wealthy elites the ability to classify their compound acreage in the middle of such places as Long Island and the Hamptons as farmland, take a tax benefit, and produce enough to feed a cat.

Secondly, ‘large farms make up less than 4% of all farms and account for more than 66% of all sales. And that number continues to edge higher.   They are corporate farms.

And third, the Federal government continues to subsidize small farms up to $20 billion annually.

The value of agricultural exports to China is roughly $23 billion, which represents about 5% of all production in US.

It isn’t just the US Swamp that is fearful of Trump. It is The Swamps that exist globally.   He has turned their power off. He has broken the rules. He does not recognize their structure. And he wants to fix the chaos that they have so dedicatedly created for well over a hundred years.

Certainly there have been a few anomalies in the US; Kennedy, surely. But his fate and that of his brother reveal how determined the International Swamp is to maintain their brotherhood as is.

Lastly, the Federal Reserve Bank:   What is their job? Primarily – to address ‘banking panics’. Secondarily to manage money supply.   In 2012 when Obamanomics was considered an economic catastrophe the response of the Federal Reserve was not to commission economist papers, but to ‘do something’ to leverage that catastrophe. They have no business commissioning reports – outside of their Banking duties.

Trump recently threatened to take down the Federal Reserve; his animosity for that corrupt regime has been no secret.

The Enemy of my Enemy is My Friend.

Trump has been in office two+ years. He has fought for The People while being verbally attacked, legally attacked, his family in jeopardy, his life threated, and still he rose for us.  They are – running scared.

Ukraine – A Biden, FBI & CIA Massive Corruption Explosion

Remember Burisma Holding Company?   Hunter Biden and Devin Archer (John Kerry’s adviser) were among prominent Board members/executives that miraculously appeared in the nick of time after the Yanukovich coup and gobbled up swathes of oil and gas leases liberally handed out by the new President Poroshenko.   At the time of the coup, Joe Biden was in charge of US/Ukraine ‘relations’. The supposed purpose of the annexation coup was the Obama administration wanted control of Ukraine and Yanukovich was an ally of Russia.

Burisma Holding Company, founded in 2002, had virtually nothing until the coup changed all that.  It has since expanded and rebranded itself as one of 35 companies linked as subsidiaries under the auspices of Mikola Zlochevskyi.   All of the expansion came after Biden showed up.

Remember daddy Biden lamenting that he was the poorest politician?

Burisma now holds the most independent licenses in Ukraine totaling 35 and is ‘the largest’ oil and gas lease company in Ukraine.

Biden is no longer – poor.

Burisma is registered in Cyprus, a tax haven that extends confidentiality far beyond that of Switzerland.

In February 2016, Joseph Cofer Black, the Director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center from 1999-2002, and Ambassador at Large for counter-terrorism, 2002-2004, joined Burisma’s Board of Directors.  Odd.

March 2016, Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion of loan guarantees if President Poroshenko did not fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin who was investigating corruption in Burisma Holdings; Shokin was fired on March 29, 2016.  His replacement Lutsenko, was the former leader of the bloc party of Poroshenko.  However, in 2012, Lutsenko was charged with abuse of office and forgery, and sentenced to four years in jail for embezzlement.   Originally a member of the Socialist/Communist Party of Ukraine, Lutsenko became a Poroshenko Partyman in 2014 when Chocolate King was edged in as President after the Ukrainian coup.

Meanwhile, in 2018 Zlochevskyi was being investigated for illegally issuing oil and gas licenses to the companies that belonged to him in 2010-2012 while he was Ecology Minister under Yanukovich.  Oops.

Poroshenko called for his recusal, utilizing Lutsenko as the newly endowed Prosecutor General after Shokin was fired for investigating Burisma Holding Company. And surprise!   After an ‘investigation’ it was concluded that no charges were found plausible against Burisma.

Meanwhile, Soros decided this was a good time to open a new NGO in the US that identified ‘corruption in Ukraine – Anticorruption Action Center, or AntAC.   AntAC is supported by – Poroshenko.

April 21, the final round for the 2019 Ukraine presidential election will occur with a comedian, Volodymre Zelenskyi leading definitively against Poroshenko. The ‘non-political’ Soros created NGO, AntAC is desperately trying to demonize Zelenskyi while glorifying Poroshenko.   And apparently, it isn’t working, Zelenskyi is leading by more than 15%. Still, headlines on AntAC claim that the US worshipped Zelenskyi as a hero for going to prison while fighting the demons of Russia.

Why don’t the voters like Poroshenko? He has tanked the economy, he has done nothing of value, unemployment is rampant, bombings, corruption, fraud, – you name it. He is worthless. The male Hillary.

Meanwhile; Joseph Black the newly appointed Board member of Burisma, was once Vice Chairman at Blackwater, a mercenary company created by Erik Prince, before becoming an advisor to Mitt Romney during his campaign, before becoming the Director of Northwest Biotherapeudics, before being elected to the Board of Burisma.  Obviously, he has his hand in the putrid bile that is liquefying the web.

The wicked web of the Black Widow spider has woven silk everywhere.

Meanwhile; Karen Greenaway, who worked for the FBI for 22+ years before ‘being retired’ December 2018, was one of the leading investigators of the Manafort case in Ukraine, and was a glowing supporter of – AntAc, Lutsenko – and by default – Soros, even attending Soros events. The FBI confirmed her alliance with Soros.

Michael Vachon, a spokesperson for Soros, who was questioned about the Greenaway/Manafort connection and Russian collusion, announced that Soros had funded a new group, Democracy Integrity Project – which was founded by another former FBI official, Daniel Jones, with the purpose of ‘investigating everything – Trump’.   Democracy Integrity hired – Fusion GPS.

DANG!

If you EVER felt sorry for Mueller or Comey or Rosenstein, or any of the possible hundreds involved in this massive conspiracy – don’t.   They all were more than aware of everything I have discussed.   This involves the FBI, the CIA, Biden personally, Obama, Kerry, and every low life that felt some sense of aspiration or greed to belie every law of the US and the Constitution.

When Trump says this is massively bigger than the Nixon Watergate fiasco – he is understating!   This is – Everything.  And this is JUST – Ukraine.

Shitake Mushroom.

US Healthcare – vs Health Insurance

An interesting query/comment was put before me today that sparked the need for a blog – Healthcare vs Health Insurance – as a mandate. How could a basic coverage plan work and still be fair?  

  1. Basic coverage would exclude prescriptions, cosmetic procedures, dental, vision, and ambulance services. Long term care would also not be covered.
  2. Individuals making less than a specified amount, lets say $50,000 per year, would pay into the system a percentage of their gross income. All others would pay a progressive flat fee with a cap. Tiers for family’s would be progressive up to a maximum of two children per couple. All couple’s with more than two children would pay a flat fee for each successive child.
  3. Insurance company’s would no longer be the middleman unless someone wanted supplemental insurance coverage through an independent private insurance company.
  4. In order to access coverage an insurance card would be issued to each individual including children, with a picture updated annually.
  5. Medicaid and all forms within that conversation would be eliminated.
  6. Servicemen would be covered with the military picking up the cost 100% for any member earning below a threshold – say $50,000.
  7. The VA would be eliminated.
  8. Congress would NOT vote on the proposal, instead a vote would be made by all legal taxpayers, their status verified via a comparable analysis of Social Security numbers within the IRS computer system.
  9. In order to make this work over the long haul, the entire government pension system would be – eliminated. This would be voted on by taxpayers, not Congress.
  10. The government would fix the value of services.
  11. The cost of prescription drugs would be tied to a global mean amount so that US citizens are no longer subsidizing the world’s cost.
  12. Medicare would remain intact.

Currently, the federal government spends $1.1 trillion for healthcare, $583 billion for Medicare over receipts, and $430 billion for all other healthcare. Individuals cough up an additional $2.4 trillion per year. Of course this includes the average annual expenditure of Hollywoodites requiring $500k of plastic surgery per year, so the number has some skew room.

It is estimated that the US spends about $12,000 per year for each person on healthcare. That is double the next developed countries output.   That would indicate that the US spending could be cut in half from $3.5 trillion to $1.75 trillion which includes ‘Hollywood excesses’.

However, simple averages in healthcare spending do not necessarily reflect true cost:

According to Kaiser, “In 2016, 5% of the population accounted for half of all health spending. The 5% of people who spend the most on health care spend an average of around $50,000 annually; people in the top 1% have average spending of over $109,750. At the other end of the spectrum, the 50% of the population with the lowest spending accounted for only 3% of all total health spending; the average spending for this group was $276.”

Even when comparing spending for people over the age of 65, 10% of that population accounted for 50% of the spending. People with a prior diagnosis of a disease spend upwards of 300% more than those currently diagnosed. And spending costs for those over the age of 65 is 2-3 times greater than those aged 35-45.

Between 2010 and 2016, Health insurers saw an increase in revenue from Medicare and Medicaid surging from $92.5 to $213 billion – an increase of 77% with the advent of Obamacare.   That income is mostly generated by taxing taxpayers to pay for the splurging costs incurred by those who have no wage, illegals, and/or welfare recipients.

As of 2017, the top six executives at United Healthcare raked in $1.75 billion in compensation.

In 2017, the US national gross income was roughly $19.6 trillion. From a simplistic standpoint, even an 8% tax levy on all gross income would pay for the entire healthcare costs assuming the above reductions in cost put the total annual cost on par with developed countries. If Trump’s tax overhaul were to bring back to the US income that is currently untaxable in foreign off-shore accounts, the flat percentage would be even lower.

How did Health Insurance even arrive in the US?

The brainchild result of FDR’s policies, insurance was invoked because FDR levied price and wage controls that stagnated capitalism in the employment industry.   In order to provide a benefit that another employer did not, so as to encourage a higher tiered worker, companies opened Pandora’s Box for the Insurance scheme.

Founded in 1929, Blue Cross and Blue Shield was the brainchild of Democrat Justin Ford Kimball.   As VP of health care facilities in Dallas Texas, the recipients were teachers who were guaranteed 21 days of hospital care per year for $6.   The tax exempt status of Blue Cross helped achieve increased costs.   At the time, it is estimated that the above average wage earner spent roughly 2%-3% of their income on healthcare.   Most people utilized friends, neighbors, midwives, Indian medicine, herbal cures, etc…

Eliminating the Middleman is key to lowering healthcare costs.   Obamacare did the opposite, it made more money for the Insurance Industry while enslaving the worker and businesses to an ever burgeoning cost that is now double any other industrialized country in the world.

Double. Let that sink in.

Simply rolling back Obamacare will NOT have the reduced cost effect that is necessary to bring the healthcare of the US to par.   And while this is not Medicare for all, or Universal coverage, it is an elimination of a middleman that has profited serendipitously at the expense of you and I.

My annual percentage is now over 20% of gross income.