Hate Crime in US – statistics of blame

There is no better place to find fodder for a blog, than in a Blog or even the Liberal commentaries within a Blog.

When the Blog begins with the notion that ‘blame’ is wholly Hypocritical and a male thing, or a Republican thing, or a Christian thing, the uh-ohs begin. Because ultimately, the Blog will find a place to place – the Blame – without understanding that the hypocrisy has come full circle.

Commentaries are even more ridiculous. When a commentator has nothing to defend their point, they immediately revert to defamation of character. And they don’t beat around the bush – they go for the gut and glory.

One such Blame I have found is that Trump is the cause of the ‘spike in hate crimes’. Actually, hate crimes against Muslims began a steady rise in 2012, during the Obama Presidency.   It is also worth discussing who is committing the hate crimes, against whom, and why is it that hate that is targeted against white people is NOT counted as a hate crime?  At least not by the Liberals.

No one would say they support hate crime, but it is important to maintain a level head regarding statistics: The number of incidences in 2013, as reported by the FBI, was 5,928. Out of a total US population of 330 million, that would represent .0018% of the population. Of those hate crimes, 3407 were racially motivated 67% per perpetrated against blacks, but 52% of those were white offenders. So now we can extrapolate that .0003% of the white population is responsible for some sort of a hate crime.

‘Hate Crime” is defined within multiple categories:  assault, rape, intimidation, property theft/damage, and murder. Of the total number of ‘hate crimes’ that resulted in murder, the percentage is .1% – or five people. Again no one is condoning crimes, it is just about showing the statistical divergences and disproportionate attention.

Despite these extremely low statistics, somehow, Hate Crime represents Trump and all other white people in the US…

According to the same FBI, in 2013 the number of blacks killed by whites stood at .77 per 1 million. By contrast, the number of whites killed by blacks was 9.83 per 1 million. Ten times more.   In 2007, there were 14,000 assaults on white women by black men.  Versus ALL total hate crimes = 5,928.

The problem with statistics, is they actually reveal truth.

The number of hate crimes committed by whites ‘pales’ in comparison to the total crimes committed against whites by blacks. But diverting this focus to an agenda of ‘hate crime’ serves two purposes: Division. Hate.

It extends a justification for blacks to commit more crime. It subjugates whites. And it sets up a nation for an even greater agenda – civil war. Unfounded in statistics, but energized by shadows who see the fall of the US as an end game.

The writer of this fodder article takes it a few steps further blaming Trump for the ‘cold blooded murder of Muslims, ICE agents rounding up Latinos, and threatening Jews with the oven! WOW! None of this occurred until Trump was President… WOW!

According to the FBI, the number of religious motivated hate crimes involved 1223 victims. Of those, 61% were Jewish, 13.7% were Muslim, 6.1% were Catholic, and 3.8 were Protestant. That means that a total of 167 Muslims were the target of hate crimes… compared to 746 Jews. What we don’t know is who were the perpetrators in these cases.   Were Muslims targeting Jews?

Lastly, this woman alleges that what we have today is “Trump’s America” and a Revolution is a means to vengeance.

The statistics I cited were Obama’s America. The causes have been inflated way out of proportion.   But the anger has most definitely been incited, the bitterness is overwhelming, and the desire to destroy profound. All in the name of Peace.   I see it so often cited by people who define themselves as pacifists, lovers, embedded in tolerance, embracing, kind, and yet – somehow they can’t see the mirror, the reflection that they promote is far different. Death threats are justified. Assault is justified. Because it comes in ‘their name of peace’.

Unfortunately, many, if not most of these outlets promoting victimhood, are also promoting Dissent and Revolution. Which fuels conservatives to ‘buy more guns’ out of fear of these peace loving revolutionaries who just want us all – dead.

Weinstein – Sexual Predators

It’s interesting that these women who have stepped out of the closet after 30+ years are labeled heroes for finally exposing Weinstein’s sexual predatory actions. It is equally interesting who is claiming to have ‘no knowledge’ of any of his purported indiscretions. Hollywood is a community, like Peyton Place, where everyone knows everything about everybody. The fact that this ‘community’ aided and abetted, enabled and supported the illegal activity of Weinstein is rather significant.

It is reported that his contract had a clause regarding sexual harassment, apparently numerous women were paid off over the course of decades. The Hollywood couch has long been a part of the package. And it didn’t extend to just attractive women, but men and boys as well.   This is – their community.

Not only did these ten women aid Weinstein’s perversity, but his company and Directors as well – Robert Weinstein, Lance Maerov, Richard Koenigsberg and Tarak Ben Ammar.   They turned a blind eye, cut the checks, and shrugged it off. To make the claim that they are ‘utterly shocked by the allegations’, is quite sad. Why is this different than sex trafficking?

Sex trafficking: when someone uses coercion to cause a commercial sex act. A commercial sex act is when a person receives something in exchange – like an Oscar, a role in a movie…

When looking at various historical sexual predatory scandals, Hollywood would seem to be at the forefront of many accusations; Franklin Scandal, UN Scandal, British Scandals – Jimmy Savile, a scandal that has sat on the books now for nearly 40 years… Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein?

The story is sensationalized, money is exchanged, private discussions, the story is quashed, time passes, everyone forgets, the victims become the bad guy, and history is rewritten.   Over and over again.

In the ‘real world’, aiding and abetting a criminal – is a crime. But Hollywood has set themselves above the law – above education – and above morality. They represent tyranny. They rewrite our history to conform to an agenda, an ideology that suits their perverse humor. Their power has superseded city, state and federal government.

Our acceptance has become so lax that the sex/porn/enslavement industry has surpassed the drug trade. On the low side, it is estimated that the industry nets $150 billion tax free per year. There is no real way to know the finances given it isn’t a measured business reporting profits to the IRS…

I’ve listened to friends who justify their porn as not hurting anyone, just a natural part of human sexuality.   But of course, it is hugely false, it is a rationale that has even been supported by therapists. How small – is what created how big.

The problem that has evolved is how do you squash an industry that makes ten times more Net Income than the largest company in the world – Walmart? Pornography was legalized in the US under the statute of ‘free speech’ and consensual adults. But apparently, that wasn’t good enough, the simple porn became blasé, and the demand for illegal pedophile and forced slavery became the appetite.

And the industry flourished. Sting operations continue, a few gang members and pimps go to jail, but the real CEO’s remain untouched. Weinstein has flown the coup taking a private jet to an unknown destination under the pretext of registering into a clinic for sex addiction.   Given charges could be filed, it would seem he has become simply another cog in the mechanization of the industry. The story will die and history rewritten.

Gun Control in Australia: A Hype of Statistics

Australia’s Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, has offered to help the US mitigate our gun problem. According to her, we must have the government simply buy up every gun in the country and physically destroy them, just like they did.

A Liberal, Bishop was an attorney in Australia before suddenly flying to the US in 1996 and spending eight weeks at Harvard whereupon she was ‘encouraged’ to go into politics. Apparently, she was ‘rather good’ given that within two years she defeated an incumbent of 17 years for the federal position of Australian Parliament for Curtin.

In 2015, Bishop actively campaigned for the Clinton Foundation, she worked side by side with Billy in committing Australia and the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) to work together to transform access to health in developing countries over the next five years.

In fact, between 2008 and 2014, through the tireless work of Bishop… Australia contributed $88 million to the Clinton Foundation. By default, we can assume a Soros connection.

In 1996, Australia initiated new gun laws which called for confiscation and registration. In 1997 there were 2.5 million privately owned guns. In 2016, there were 3.15 million privately owned guns. In 1997, there were 2.5 million registered guns in Australia, indicating that before the law was activated, all privately owned guns were already registered. In 2016, 2.89million guns were registered, indicating that with the enactment of the law, 26 thousand guns are now unaccounted.

Statistics are important as a measure based on ‘per capita’, not on simple numbers. As such, crime in Australia for burglaries, rape, assaults, drug use, and violence are significantly higher than in the US.

Citing the significant drop in the homicide rate in Australia as evidence that gun confiscation works, is a bit misleading given that the numbers had already begun a sharp decline beginning in 1989, nearly 10 years earlier.

So if Australia confiscated and destroyed 650,000 guns in its massive gun control program, how is it that there are more guns privately owned today, and more unregistered guns today and still a lower murder rate?  The numbers don’t work…

There are two possible explanations:

1)   In Queensland, South Australia and The Northern Territory life imprisonment is a mandatory sentence for murder. The possibility of parole and recidivism doesn’t exist.

2)   Over the last decade the prison rate in Australia has increased by roughly 58%.  More murderers in jail, no parole, no recidivism, lower murder rates.

Another comparison is worthy of Note:

  • In 1987, the murder rate in Australia was 2. In 2009, the rate was 1.3. The decrease that the government would have us believe was attributable to gun confiscation and regulation, was 35%.
  • In 1987, the murder rate in the US was 8.3. In 2009, the rate was 5.   A 40% decrease that the government would have us believe is attributable to…?  Oops!

Statistics can be useful – when the user isn’t promoting an agenda. The US experienced a greater decrease in murder rates over the same time period as Australia, while imposing NO gun control or confiscations.

Here’s another fun fact:

According to the quite Liberal Washington Post, the average gun owner in the US owns 8 guns! Over 20% of gun owners own more than 10. If the US rate is 6 times that of Australia, that would mean that more household individuals own guns in Australia than the US!

These statistics mimick the vaccine propaganda which utilizes a chart to show when a vaccine was first administered and the decline in the rate of the disease. What they don’t show is the fact that 99% of the time, the rate of the disease had already been dropping precipitously well before the administration of the vaccine and there is now no way to know if it had simply reached its natural course and would have eliminated itself.

The obvious intent on creating gun control and possibly confiscation in the US is the ability to initiate Martial Law, which is what most gun owners fear. Rightfully.  Using each propaganda event as catastrophic proof that gun control is a necessary solution, is a liberal agenda that has absolutely no verifiable statistic – including Australia.

Confederate Monuments; Art, History and Censorship

I think we have lost sight as to what a ‘Monument or Sculpture” is, what it represents, and it’s value as antiquity. Destroying history is exactly what ISIS is attempting to do in Syria as they ravage entire museums and coliseums filled with the representation of a society hundreds and/or thousands of years ago.

During the time of Michelangelo, bronze sculptures were melted down for their iron content to make cannonballs, and art was lost for the call to war. A culture, a society, died with that decision just as thousands of cultures died at the hands of ISIS.  And now the lefters in the US want to expunge historic remnants of civilization, as though expunging these antiquities will have any impact at all other than the censorship they foment

Having dabbled as a sculptress, I appreciate the art, the labor, the time, and the love that is poured into each unique piece.   Destroying a piece of art is criminal.  In the world of dance, Balanchine was an amazing choreographer.  He was also a purported liar, cruel and has been accused of requiring many of his dancers to engage in  sex with him.  Should we ban all his ballets?  We can look at nearly every leader in history and find the faults, the imperfections, the sin.   No one human is sinless. And therefore, in parallel to the thinking that anything that is not perfect must be destroyed, we would have left only one sculpture, Jesus Christ.

Siddhartha/Buddha was a King’s son filled with gluttonous ways and royal greed – sinful.   Caesar was a military general who defied orders and instituted a coup in order to assume power…   King David was an adulterer who sent his mistress’ husband to his death on the front lines of war.   Nero had his mother murdered.   Should all their sculptures be destroyed?

It is no different than the burning of books, a form of censorship that has only one purpose, the destruction of a cultural heritage through violent means. The Nazi’s used book burning to try and eradicate history. In researching ‘book burnings’ the number of accounts in history is horrifyingly massive. This form of obliteration has been used for thousands of years to incite violence – not to quell it.

The Ruins of Rome. They represent thousands of years of slavery and death. Yet they also represent art, culture, history and a view into an era long gone. Should we raze the ruins and build an apartment complex?   In Denver at DIA, visitors driving into the airport are greeted by a 32 foot rearing blue Mustang horse with crazed red eyes that glow with evil. The horse fell on it’s sculptor, killing him, before it was erected – the eyes were added by the son. It’s creepy, but it’s also beautiful and it is art.

We commemorate thousands of people and industries and companies with sculptures – firemen, policemen, and even Genghis Khan known for his brutal genocide and for his fathering of thousands of children whose descendants today number somewhere in the range of 16 million!  That’s history.

The US has roughly 40 million people of Irish descent. They were slaves before the Africans. They aren’t protesting and rioting and demanding destruction of antiquities and artifacts. They aren’t calling for book burnings and censorship. The logic of what is happening is quite bizarre as it has crossed lines and tributaries in directions that make no rational sense at all. Perhaps we should simply destroy all sculptures and books and media because by and large they are the product of ‘Men” and well, men have a history of enslaving women…  Shakespeare?  Gone!   Plato?  Gone!  Aristotle?  Gone!   T. S. Eliot?  Gone!  Michelangelo?  Rembrandt?   Mozart?   Gone!

The absurdity of chaos has seemingly drugged our water, and logic and rational thought have been vanquished. Censorship was the tool of the Nazi regime, destruction of history is the tool of ISIS. These are facts.

Opioid Addiction – Big Pharma Profits

Opioids. The epidemic began when? Under whose watch? Under what guise?   They cut deals, dealt openly, took kickbacks and lucrative add-ons all at the behest of their Master who created the newest pyramid scheme, the dealers themselves; Big Pharm, the Insurance Industry and Doctors.   The street pimps? They were small potatoes compared to the real money – $$$$$$$$$$$$$ billions.

If you want to blame a President, then go back to the beginning, when the push became one of the biggest scams in history. 1998.

Pharma needs a continual epidemic in order to survive. Insurance is willing to play as long as the Opioids don’t create lawsuits, and the doctors, well they just want a piece of the action.

Last year I had back surgery for a herniated disc. After the surgery I felt great, and given I get side effects from narcotics, I opted to not take any. But the hospital went into a tizzy claiming I was ‘required’ to not only take them during my stay, but also I was ‘required’ to fill a prescription for home before they would release me! We argued. I spit out the pills into my hand feeling much like I was a character in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, and the prescription fill sat in my kitchen until this ‘unnamed’ person chose to lay claim to the drug and empty the bottle…

SO who was President in 1998?   Billy. And where was Soros?   He was fighting a slew of accusations claiming he was a co-conspirator in the Hillary Haiti scam, and fussing up to having actually participated in looting with the Nazi’s, and battling the new media which no longer portrayed him as the angelic philanthropist.

It was the beginning of a long thought out chess game in which the sheep would be slaughtered by drugs, led astray in education with the rewriting of history, and immorality was considered normal and embraced.

Opioids have been an epidemic for 20+ years, and the media is crying for Trump to solve this heinous crime.   Really??  But who are the perpetrators, the instigators who profited handsomely – Big Pharm, the Insurance Industry, and doctors who no longer ‘cured anything’ but instead prescribed massive doping drugs to mask the true devastation of disease, and thus create – addiction.

This addiction having reached massive proportions, Big Pharma will be called on to find a new drug to cure the addiction their Opioids created, and a new and ever more massive scam will pervade.   Drugs to cure the side effects of drugs to cure the side effect of – drugs.  But wait, Obama already approved a new and improved – old drug – to cure the catastrophe created by the other ‘old drug’.

So, how many drugs does it take to support an industry that needs to make $450 billion per year just to meet last year’s quota? How many people are employed by Big Pharma? A million? More?   And with the newest addition, Biotech, the stakes are massively higher. Think a President can even dent that equation? Or add to it? This is far beyond the scope of a President.

During Hillary’s campaign, she took in over $336,000 from Big Pharma, more than any other candidate. Donald Trump? $1,010. No missing zeroes.

By 2008, when Bush was President, drug overdose deaths were nearly matching those of deaths from vehicular accidents which is considered “the leading cause of injury related death in the US”. By 2016, when Obama was President, Opioid deaths had nearly doubled with Maryland, Maine, Delaware and Connecticut, leading the pack. What did Obama do? He had the FDA approve a new drug that Big Pharma could freely market, Probuphine. It is administered via an ‘implant’ that releases a continuous flow into the bloodstream. It is an opioid. Side effects are possible, infection from the surgical implantation, and dependency or death may occur.

While in tablet or pill form Probuphine has the same efficacy as Methadone and has been in existence since 1981, the implant version was just approved and studies have yet to determine comparative results.

The bottom line;  giving a drug to stop the use of another drug does nothing to mitigate the problem and only ramps up the profit margin of the problem, i.e., Big Pharma, the Insurance Industry and Doctors.   Can Trump change this cycle? I doubt it. This is a well instilled logic and rational which has helped to drive up medical costs, insurance rates, and hospital bills to the point of no return.   And Big Pharma isn’t about to take a hit.

DNC – Hack and Murder?

It is interesting who is “NOT” in the news of late; Obama and Hillary.  Nary a peep.  

Obama:   Apparently, the only news circulating right now is about how mean some people were to Michelle while she was First Lady because they called her names which of course meant that it was all racially motivated and the entire US is divided by race as evidenced by the fact that she was once pulled over in her car by the police – because she was black.   WHEW!   Or the time a random person crossed the street rather than walk into her. WOW!   But of course, the piece de resistance was when she donned her Hillary impression claiming that requiring a ‘certain kind of voter ID’ was racist.

Then she shed a few virtual tears.

As the audience filed out I imagine they shed a few racially provoked, white man obscenities toward our current President, just to make everything equal and fair…

Michelle’s nuance regarding voter ID’s coincides with Eric Holder suddenly appearing in the media as he radically denounces the Voter Fraud Commission headed by Kris Kobach. Blasting the Commission as not having statistical proof, the absurdity is glaring given that actual proof has been substantiated, not to mention the laughable 125% voter turnout record in Florida, or the 100% votes cast for one person – Obama – in numerous Pennsylvania districts. These are statistical facts and anomalies that Holder would rather term – racist.

So we now know that Obama and Holder are in fact colluding in the news by making the same radicalized, false statement within days of each other…  Ahhhh.

Meanwhile, Barrack Obama has been busily campaigning for another “Committee”, the National Redistricting Committee which aims to bring lawsuits against Republicans in states where Democrats lose a state race by claiming the loss was a result of ‘gerrymandering’.   The purpose of the Committee is to redraw state maps so that Districts voting Democrat will be more heavily weighted in the final voting process and be counted as Democrat.  Gee, no manipulation there.

Adding to the inert silence regarding Obama is the revelation that Wasserman Shultz and upwards of twenty DNC staffers utilized an IT team from Pakistan, namely Mr. Awan and Company, who is personally currently under arrest by the FBI after a lengthy investigation and his recent attempt to flee the country.  Of course, the Liberal media say this is all ‘racially motivated’, as in Islamophobia.  I wasn’t aware that the Liberal Media was more adept at criminal investigations than our FBI?  Silly me.

Could Mr. Awan have information about the DNC hack that the Clinton/Wasserman connection would rather be silenced? Could this revelation ignite an inquiry into the Seth Rich murder? Given the DNC, and by default Wasserman, adamantly proclaimed that the hack came from Russia, we now find that Mr. Awan might be persuaded to reveal – the Truth.   Of course, it is also concerning that Mr. Awan, a Pakistani, and his team were given security clearance in our government despite the high level of terrorist organizations that have infiltrated Pakistan.

It seems uniquely coincidental that Seth Rich was working within the same IT Department of the DNC during the time that Mr. Awan and Company were the go to IT Security Team…  An email hack occurred and Mr. Rich is subsequently murdered…

To date, the DNC hack has been attributed to Russia by The Washington Post, Snopes, and The New York Times. It is interesting that these media outlets have the ability to determine the conclusion of an ongoing investigation… And, of course, it is no coincidence that these organizations are all quite Liberal, Left leaning, Democrat subsidies.

Wasserman’s guilt is further highlighted by the fact that she continued to defend her team of Pakistani genius’s despite growing evidence of fraud and an attempt to flee the country while depositing large sums in a Pakistani bank account.   Could Clinton and Wasserman have orchestrated Awan’s failed attempt to flee the country via Qatar and Pakistan? Because he is now being represented by an associate of the Clintons.

IT questions abound in the Democrat Party. An Iranian hacker/IT genius was pardoned by Obama in 2015, Nima Golestaneh. The pardon involved exchanging seven Iranian prisoners for four Americans and soliciting the infamous Iranian nuke deal. Obviously a very win-win for Iran.   Golestaneh’s guilty plea was tied to the conspiracy to hack Vermont based, Arrow Tech.  Arrow Tech’s main product is computer software that helps calculate missile trajectories. Hacking that software would be something akin to old James Bond movie whereby a missile could be redirected to strike its source instead of the intended target.   A rather scary potential! Especially given, the man was pardoned.

Wasserman’s IT guy, Imran Awan, was only one of many Pakistani’s purportedly to have committed fraud while employed by the DNC and subsequently – fired. Now, despite the charges, Wasserman has fueled a racism conspiracy theory in which she and the attorney claim this is all about the fact that Awan is – Muslim.   This defense would follow Michelle Obama and Eric Holder’s epic racist commentaries just a few days ago…

Awan’s LinkedIn account states that he was the “Information Technology Director at US Congress and Computer & Network Security Consultant”.

Question? How is it that these Pakistani and Iranian hackers are hired within highly sensitive government and defense organizations and no one seems to question their clearance or security?   Is there no other IT expert that meets the same criteria or background? Are they somehow more competent than any other American IT expert? Awan is not an America citizen. Neither was Golestaneh.

Lest we forget; the Democrats seem not to be immune to IT scandals. Hillary Clinton’s server was scrubbed by Platte River Networks, whose CEO is Treve Suazo. Despite the illegalities, no one has yet to conclude with any convictions. Paul Combetta, who was implicated in the scrubbing was granted immunity from prosecution by Obama. No other charges have been filed…

But according to the Liberal Media – these are all just non-related coincidences and conspiracies.  The FBI doesn’t know what they are doing.  And the only problem here is – Trump…

Refugees vs Veterans: A Cost Analysis

Over 4 million veterans are on disability… They are eligible to receive ‘as much as’ $3000 per month for their disability and medical care – max $36,000 per year. Every year more than 8,000 veterans commit suicide.   They are injured, they are traumatized, and they are left to die in waiting rooms at VA Hospitals that are rife with corruption.

The average cost per household of Middle Eastern refugees is about $258,000 over five years, or $51,600 per year. More than 95% of refugees are on welfare receiving free housing, medical care, food, and a stipend after that five year period.  

Even more absurd. It costs the US 12 times in $$$$ what it would cost to provide the exact same services for the refugee were they to resettle in another Middle Eastern country. That means the cost could be reduced to $4300 per year for a household if we simply let them stay where they speak the same language, have the same customs, share in the same morality, ethics and belief system.

This ludicrous solution that we support is so far removed from logic and reality, no one wants to actually analyze the facts and figures.

A conservative estimate states that the US spends about $1 billion per year on refugees. If we continued to provide for all those refugees, albeit in their own region, we would save about $920million ‘per year’ which could be diverted to our Veterans and no one would notice. Except our veterans…of course.

What these numbers do not reflect are the subjective costs. For example, veterans would not be denied jobs that were allocated to refugees. Veterans would not be so reliant on disability if they could have a worthwhile job that was re-allocated to refugees. Crime costs to society.   Education costs?  The dollar savings amass!

And yet, and still, the press and the media continue to harp about the ‘poor refugees’ and the ‘bad veterans’.   Why?

Because the media has an alternate objective. A refugee portrayed as a victim of our military is more entertainment than a veteran who has given his very life and being. It’s like a shell game.   Find the truth under the shell… but not before we take all your money…

They prey on the innocence of youth. They prey on falsification of facts. They prey on the subversion of facts. And they have an outlet that can reach millions – with partial truths, half truths and even out-right lies.

Hollywood dives for these games because that’s what Hollywood does! They act for money! They pretend. They are driven by one and only one God – Money. And the only reason people buy it is because the actors have become that much more adept – at their craft – pretending!   For $$$$$.

The stage, the play, the act, wasn’t always quite so subversive. While their heritage is “The Court Jester”, a step above the poison testers and a step below the prostitutes, today they seem to have created an elitist persona for themselves elevating their prowess to realms of godlike proportions.

Personally, I still see the Court Jester and marvel how so many Hollywooders are self imposed experts in such industries that would normally require PhD status and decades of experience.   They provide ‘expert testimony’ for such scientific theories that are normally relegated to ‘scientists’, and have opinions about everything that apparently earn them prime time news coverage, prime placement in the media, and commentary sections that utilize their ‘expertise’ to defend an intellectual theory… even if their claim to education fame is a GED High School Diploma!

Sadly, to me, they still remain, The Court Jester.

What’s even more disconcerting is that these people – know they have no education – know they have no expertise – know they have no knowledge or wisdom – and still find great victory in – pretending…

 

 

Trump Jr., – Set Up By Soros?

BADA-BING! Back story on the Trump Jr. – Natalia Veselnitskaya – Denis Katsyv – Trump Dossier – Magnitsky hoopdela, aka ‘story’ is almost laughable! And it backs into – Soros via OCCRP, Romania, Ukraine, USAID, and a big anti-Putin vendetta.

There are quite a few players in the ‘story’ which actually begins coincidentally just before Obama is elected in 2009.   The company that is continually targeted as the big bad meany is Prevezon, a shell that was bought by Katsyv for $50,000 and amassed hundreds of millions.  He bought it from an active ‘player’ Baranovsky, an Israeli Russian who is currently serving time in a Russian prison for his mafia dealings. Shortly after he bought this ‘shell’ company, a scathing article was written by OCCRP, a Romanian/ Ukrainian/Latvian company implicating Katsyv in shady dealings that occurred under the tutelage of Dmitry Baranovsky.  So, Katsyv hired legal representation.

The entire investigation is related to organized crime, tax evasion, and fraud within Manhattan real estate holdings.  Veselnitskaya is an attorney specializing in real estate and taxation hired by said US law firm to help defend Katsyv.  Fusion GPS was also hired by the same law firm to perform research to counter the allegations brought by OCCRP, a Romanian organization partially funded by Soros.   And now, everyone is a Russian spy hired by Putin – in collaboration with Trump!!

If this were a James Bond movie it would be panned as being too convoluted and confusing…

There is absolutely no connection whatsoever to the allegations of Russia election meddling. That aspect of the ‘story’ was fabricated by the media and has no judicial or legal basis. Graham Stack, one of the journalists linked to OCCRP, has written numerous articles about the corruption in Ukraine, Latvia and Russia, perpetrated NOT by Putin, but by corrupt politicians, police and socialites taking advantage of the system within the oil and gas arena as well as real estate, aka mafia.  Ta – Da!

The largest oil and gas corruption scandal in Ukraine could be traced to Burisma Holding Company which was the Hunter Biden messy coup that took place just after the US began bombing Ukraine and instituted a new chocolate president, Poroshenko.

Of course, none of these messy coups and raping of assets are foreign to the Clintons who took over the gold mines in Haiti after the devastating earthquake. The only difference is that there was no judicial inquiry or investigation… And no media outcry.

A Russian lawyer, Magnitsky, claimed that Russian officials had stolen huge sums of money from the government. OCCRP claimed they had traced said money to Katsyv’s company, Prevezon, which had then laundered it by purchasing Manhattan property.

Magnitsky subsequently was arrested and died in prison after being beaten by prison officials who were said to be connected to the Russian mafia he was investigating.

OCCRP, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, which published said scathing article and refused to retract or clarify the data despite the insistence of the law firm Harrison and Wellington, is a rather bizarre source.

OCCRP is based in Romania with reporters in Ukraine, Latvia and Serbia. All countries aligned against Russia.

In 2016, Wikileaks took a screenshot of the OCCRP website in which it stated that its funding sources included:   USAID, United Nations Democracy Fund, Center For Public Integrity, and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, ICIJ, which is a Soros prefect. The United Nations Democracy Fund has player ties to Gershman who is a member of the Socialist Party of America.

Full circle:

The Gasp Big evidentiary matter against Katsyv is that he opened a Delaware company , Human Rights Accountability Global Initiative Foundation, which aims to open adoption between the US and Russia… The media claims it is a front. Without any evidence whatsoever. Simply a media statement.  And this is proof positive of his involvement in the Russian mafia and money laundering…  What???

Prevezon, the company in question per the media, is a real estate organization. They buy, sell and manage properties. Ms. Veselnitskaya, as an attorney, specializes in real estate transactions and acquisitions.  It is quite possible that Trump Jr., was speaking with her completely out of context from the Magnitsky case, and simply out of the Trump desire to expand their real estate acquisitions and holdings into Russia, which Trump had already alluded to given it is an untapped market.

The Magnitsky case. The Russian mafia corruption, fraud and money laundering apparently became a US judiciary concern given the Manhattan real estate. Thus, the real estate was confiscated and a case against Russian mafioso’s was instigated with Kasyv being the prime target.   The Putin – Trump – – election mess all came about as a side story that was linked by one word – Russia.

If every mafia scandal in the US was credited to the then sitting President, we probably wouldn’t have a clean official for decades.

What we do have is a Romanian organization making a claim against a Russian real estate magnate whose father once worked for the government. We have a dead Russian lawyer who was investigating the Russian mafia. And we have a Soros organization making assertions that all of this relates back to a Trump/Putin conspiracy. And we have Trump’s son speaking with a lawyer who represented Katsyv in clearing him of the mafia connection so as to preserve his company Prevezon and his assets from seizure.

Lastly, we have a media hyped, desperate and drooling to find some connection between Putin and Trump that would support the assertion that they worked together conspiratorially to subvert the US Presidential election, and oust Hillarygate.

And despite all their best efforts to create a connection, it is always based on absolutely no actual evidence. But they still hyper-ventilate a supposition/theory… with Soros at the helm.  He’ll die before he will let Trump win.

GUNMAN TARGETS GOP

We are now immensely saddened to hear the consequence of ‘inciting hatred’. This is the real life reaction of a brutal campaign advocated by Democrats, the media, Entertainers, and Comedians who demand members of the Republican party be shot, stabbed, killed, beheaded, and massacred. It isn’t a comedy routine. It is the perverse consequence of a more perverse incitement.

It may be orchestrated by Soros, but The People should have the ability, the morality, the most basic of ethical values to know, to see, and to step away from the frayed frenzy.

Interestingly, Democrats are claiming it isn’t incitement, it is guns. It isn’t about Democrats and Republicans, despite what the gunman said, it is about the ‘unbalanced’. It isn’t about the vile tongue lashings, or the call for anarchy, it is about Trump and entitlement, and the “Me” generation.

Give me what I demand or I will throw a tantrum. And when I grow up, I have no boundaries, I know nothing of values, nothing of good or bad, I only know what I have been taught – life is about ME.

What creates the ‘unbalanced’?  What creates ‘Incitement”?  Not guns – people.

So far, the only one dead is the gunman, although numerous politicians and aides are in the hospital. Releasing between 50 and 100 shots, he knew his mark, it was everyone, because they were the bad guys, they were Republicans. He was in a stocked fishing pond.

Nothing has been released about the gunman.

James Comey: Death of a Salesman

In the play, Death of a Salesman, Willy Loman vacillates between different perceptions of his life. After confronting his boss and demanding a better situation, Willy gets angry and finds himself fired. Caught in a series of lies, debt and a downward spiral, Willy ultimately kills himself enabling his wife and sons to reap the benefits of his life insurance policy.

There seem to be parallels in the life of FBI Director, Comey and Willy Loman. His testimony revealed a weak, unethical, small man unable to take a leadership position, which ultimately resulted in an anger vent that resulted in his getting fired. Now caught in a series of lies, leaks and unlawful actions, Comey is spiraling.

Hillary’s hacked emails and personal server, opened up ‘an investigation’. Former Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, meets with Billy Clinton on his private plane, has a private discussion, and then apparently tells Comey to back off, don’t call it ‘an investigation’, but refer to it as a ‘matter’ so that Hillary’s run for President won’t be impacted.

The Swamp is coming apart at the seams.

Comey got caught in a lie: Comey declared that his ‘leaking’ was a consequence of Trump’s tweet, but in fact the tweet came after the leak.

So we now have a man who was in the position of one of the US government’s highest order and power, admitting that he succumbed to pressure/blackmail in the Hillary email scandal, and just now lied before a Congressional Committee.

During Comey’s short tenure as FBI Director, the department is said to have fractured and as a result of his actions the FBI and Comey are now subject to investigation.  Their reputation in the twalette, and turmoil prevails.

What happened?   It is no coincidence that Comey was appointed as FBI Director in 2013 by Obama, and the same year appointed as Director of HSBC bank holdings. In fact, HSBC created a new committee just for this position, Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee, whose primary focus was ‘risk management’, i.e., preventing money laundering, terrorist financing, and ‘intelligence’. Whoa Nelly – OUCH!  Conflict of Interest?

  1. HSBC is a British company, having shut down it’s US finance arm in 2009
  2. HSBC was heavily involved in the Clinton Foundation.
  3. Theresa May’s husband works for a US investment fund, Capital Group, which closely advises HSBC.
  4. Capital Group lists one ‘private client’ – the US.

In 2012, HSBC was under a US Senate Investigation for money laundering, failure to conduct due diligence, suspicious activity reports, and inadequate and unqualified staffing and leadership.   Their hand was slapped and they were fined $1.9 billion which represented roughly 10% of their 2011 profit.  Shortly thereafter Comes is appointed to Director of FBI and simultaneously as the Director for HSBC ‘risk management’.

In 2016 two HSBC executives were charged with a $3.6 billion currency scheme which defrauded HSBC clients and manipulated the foreign exchange market.  These executives had clients who contributed generously to the Clinton Foundation.

Today HSBC is involved in an investigation brought by Belgium authorities again for  money laundering through their support of clients in the lucrative and unsavory diamond business involving numerous mega-wealthy individuals.

It would appear their new and improved risk management Committee with Comey as Director was not terribly effective…  Or maybe it was.

Obviously, the Swamp has extended its tentacles across the Atlantic into a UK partnership.

What is the Soros HSBC connection?

In 2003, with a shove and a push from Soros, Tony Blair created EITI, Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which monitors all the resources in Africa – including the diamond industry.  In 2006 Soros was appointed as governing secretariat.  Under the Soros arm of Global Witness, Soros basically took control of the diamond industry, and is thus the Kingman behind ‘blood diamonds’ creating massive wars, deaths, and resource grabs in Africa.  In 2011, Soros backed, RITC Syndicate Management, bought the insurance division of HSBC.

Just prior to the appointment of Comey as the Director of the new HSBC risk management committee, HSBC and the Clinton Foundation were discovered to have profited upwards of $81 million in ‘donations’ that flowed from money laundered accounts at HSBC to the Clinton Foundation, which included the Chagoury family of Nigeria who purportedly pledged $1 billion.  Chagoury fled arrest in Nigeria for purported implication in bribery, and helping the former President of Nigeria and his family stash solen funds from the government in the amount of $66 million.

The Clinton Foundation was never charged in the HSBC money laundering scandal, while the two HSBC executives were arrested.

Where was Comey?

Most likely cutting a deal to become the wealthy co-conspirator…2013.  Presently, Comey’s net worth is estimated to be in the $15 million range, although given his tenure at USBC, where money laundering “was” historically flagrant, his true worth is questionable.

 

And so we are led down a path of lies, leaks, fraud, money laundering, and more, with James Comey appearing to follow in the footsteps of Willy Loran – while Comey is quite alive, his reputation, his integrity, his respect and his leadership have seemingly come to a very dark death.