UN HEADLINE: Natural disasters occurring three times more often than 50 years ago: new FAO report:
“At no other point in history have agri-food systems faced more hazards such as megafires, extreme weather, unusually large desert locust swarms, and emerging biological threats, as during the past year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nor have they been seen at such frequency, intensity, and complexity, the agency said…”
This report is the precursor to divert ever more money to Africa via the Paris Accord Green Climate Fund. But what is the Truth?
The Rothschild rag, The Economist, and by default the United Nations has revealed that in the last 50 years ‘Natural Disasters’ have risen by 400%. So what’s the REAL story?
According to FEMA, the US natural disasters were in the range of 35-45 until 1996 when suddenly they were quoted at 158. Of the 158, 80 were caused by fires (51%), 27 by floods, 28 by severe storms which also included flooding, 15 by snow, 6 by hurricane, and 2 as a result of water main break and a gas leak. Then in 1997 the reports went back to normal – 47. In 1998, they added the categories of; coastal storm, drought, mudslide, and tornado with a new tally at 128 for the year. The new categories covered 7 new disasters. But fires still dominated with 44% of all disasters.
By 2000 the total number dropped even after severe ice storm and earthquake were added to the tally. 2003 numbers increased again with fires representing over 62%. By 2014, numbers had dropped below 1996 tallies. In 2020, FEMA had added 2 additional categories: Biological and Dam/Levee Break. The Biologic, aka CoVid19, accounted for 52% of the tally. So, if we were to drop that category, natural disasters in the US would be below 1996.
According to the UN, CoVid19, SARS, H1N1 are all considered ‘Natural Disasters’ as opposed to manufactured in a lab… Meaning someone ate an infected bat and then proceeded to infect the entire world and that is – natural.
But it isn’t even Biologic warfare that compromised the tallies over the last fifty years. FIRES are what altered the numbers 50 years ago. Fires account for 44% to 62% of ALL natural disasters – including fires that were human caused. And that statistic did NOT exist 50 years ago.
The problem is that the cause of fires is predominantly arson or human negligence. Of the 6 largest fires in history in Arizona, 5 were human caused. In New York City, of the 11 largest fires in history – all were human caused. But they are still categorized as a ‘natural disaster’.
To address Africa specifics per the UN and Economist Fear Mongering: 1. Locusts have been a seven year occurrence since the beginning of time – everywhere. 2. 99% of fires in Africa are set purposefully on farm fields to rejuvenate the soil – and according to ‘scientists’ these fires are an ecological ‘good thing’. So if they are a good thing and have been the means of ‘farming’ for thousands of years how and why would the UN suddenly make the determination that these fires devastate ‘agricultural livelihoods’ becomes an overtly obvious false statement.
Because the UN is lying. And there is one massive justification – more money is necessary to bolster the Green Climate Fund to spend the money on Africa infrastructure and micro-loans. The fund is depleted of new revenue. The US pulled out. China has never proffered $1, and ‘pledges’ are often in the form of grants, promissory notes and loans, not cash. The largest donations to date have been made by Japan, UK, Germany and the US respectively. Still, they greedily siphon off 75% of their total contributions into Asset hordings.
2019 is the latest year for which The Green Climate Fund prepared audited Financial Statements:
They immediately apologize for the fact that expenses increased by 89% year over year despite contributions falling 62%. At the same time their assets totaling $6.8billion increased because earnings on ‘investments’ rose about 40%. Perspective: They claim to have roughly $8billion in donations or which $6.8 billion are still ASSETS!!! UNSPENT FUNDS.
Which means they were putting more money in the bank than they spent on actual ‘projects’. Micro-loan interest also rose – 590%. The amount of actual ‘grants to countries’ was a mere $258 million which was disbursed to banks including the United Nations. WHY? The amount of actual country grants disbursed was $34,404,000. The remainder was dedicated expenses to disburse the funds.
As with every NGO, programme expenses include overhead, salaries, payroll costs, pensions, etc… within the designated ‘programme offices’. But the Financials are not transparent with regard to programme expense delineation. However, they do acknowledge an odd caveat. While Board members are not compensated, it is a per se agreement: “All transactions with the board are made at terms equivalent to an arm’s length transaction within the operational framework of the Secretariat.” That is Gob Speak for transactions are not the same as compensation… So Board Members may benefit financially, just not in the delineation of ‘compensation’.
Further, as an NGO, they are exempt from ALL Taxes.
One of my illustrious – pet peeves. ANY charity that has excess income that accumulates is no longer a charity. And with literally $trillions on the books of these NGO-Charities, their status is obviously corrupted.
The Green Climate Fund is no exception.
What is not revealed is: 1. The interest rate on their micro-lending schemes. 2. A composite of actual climate spending to date. By country. 3. How much of their actual spending is in the form of literal payments to individuals benefiting. 4. How much of their programme expenses are ‘administrative and overhead? 5. How has the carbon footprint been alleviated by their spending…?
Because these points are their entire FUNCTIONAL purpose.
Of course, the reality in all this is the fact that the Green Climate Fund is simply another scam. And we are the scamees. The payees. And the peasants to be…. UNLESS –