EU’s New Green Deal – A Scientific Failure of Problematic DATA

The EU’s New Green Deal is being hailed by the World Economic Forum as a model of success!   Yeah!   Pete Buttegieg has announced that the $3+ trillion infrastructure project proposed in the US will completely eradicate climate change!   Yeah!   China has announced it will continue to invest in coal through 2030… currently they emit a whopping 12 billion metric tons per year.   The US is below 6billion metric tons – and the EU is roughly 7 billion metric tons.   While the media prefers to show emissions based on per capita… this is rather nonsensical. The POINT, is a total because the point is a global issue – those who produce can reduce – those who don’t produce, have nothing to worry about…. Right?

Apparently not. Because money reduces emissions therefore throwing more money at various financial quackeries will benefit climate.   Not sure money will cause the formation of new icebergs and alter the temperature of the ocean, but that would appear to be the mind-fakery these politicians invoke.

Of course the other bizarre declaration-proclamation is that 1990 should be the base year of compliance measurement. Why not use 1850 or 1900?   Wouldn’t that be more logical given a return to what activists perceive as the advent of industry?

In fact, CO2 began rising the same time as temperatures did about 1550 – well before any industrial revolution as studied by David Middleton a climate geologist/geophysicist.

With much Grandeur, the World Economic Forum announced the EU’s pinky promises: “Ranging across eight policy areas – biodiversity, sustainable food systems, sustainable agriculture, clean energy, sustainable industry, building and renovating, sustainable mobility, eliminating pollution and climate action – the deal represents an unprecedented effort to review more than 50 European laws and redesign public policies.”

The EU states that funding for their financial guarantees is achieved thru the InvestEU Fund and it’s partner the European Investment Bank (EIB).   The Board of Governors is depicted as career politicians with absolutely no science, climate, or economic background career.   Yet they are the frontrunners for everything ‘sustainable’.

Given China has the largest carbon footprint and has maintained they will increase output through 2030, how is it even possible to obtain a global net zero?

By changing the methodology of measurement.

According to NOAA, prior to 1990 the means of measurement of carbon data was inaccurate: “The data collected prior to 1989 are typically not well documented and their metadata is incomplete; therefore, such data are of unknown and probably variable quality.”  

But even ‘after’ 1990, countries measured their own output using their own methodology which was NOT a global control means.

If the quality and means of collecting data was error-rated high, then how can we possibly have a viable measurement for anything greater than 30 years? How can we use 1990 as a base year if it is 100 years after the Industrial Revolution began? Clean Answer: We can’t.   Because Science has changed, and therefore is of little use other than evaluating within a small bubble of time.

That being said, we have no true factual data that can provide a core 100 years ago or 1 billion years ago – it is all ‘speculation’ ‘projections’ and ‘guesstimates’.   The same classification of Science that is used for determining how many people died of what cause, how many cases of flu per year, and the efficacy of vaccinations. The current means of measurement is an algorithm based on the input of the people controlling the output!

IF climate has changed, ebbed, flowed a constant cycle for hundreds of thousands of years, how is it possible to make the assumption that ‘this time’ it is human caused in the span of 100 years out of 800,000 years of guesses?

Recently, science provides the individual with a carbon test sensor.   If a person is in a crowded room, the carbon dioxide levels spike… meaning we all breathe out carbon dioxide – meaning get rid of people and keep ‘de plane, de plane’!

Leave that one to Bill Gates.

Footnote:   Climate gurus with the education of Greta speculate that lightening is caused by climate change.   In fact, scientists STILL are unsure what causes the negative and positive parts of a cloud become separated resulting in a match effect and lightening.   So if SCIENCE does not even know what causes this phenomena, how can they state that it is climate change caused?   Clean Answer: They can’t – so they speculate in order to get published. Because being published purportedly gives them power.

CLIMATE CHANGE: Measuring Historical Impacts and Creating BlackHoles with CERN

HOW many Scientists are there in the world?   HOW many Climate Scientists are there in the world?   Apparently no one actually knows, and the guesstimates range from 11,000 to 7 million Scientists in total. Quite a spread!   Imagine playing those spreads on the stock market buying shares?   Laughable right?   Yet given that no one knows how many there are, how is it possible to have a consensus of 97%?

Well, it’s not.

The first problem in this statistic is the fact that Climate Science Degree programs were only first introduced around 2009.   Climate Science or climatology is defined as the study of weather conditions averaged over a period of time.   After the invention of the thermometer and a global commonality of measurement of temperature in 1742, recording of temperatures became the first physical account – albeit it was not universally utilized. That would amount to 280 years of actual temperature recordings on a sporadical basis.

The statistical analysis of climate was first used in the 1950’s by Helmut Landsberg. His schooling was in physics, mathematics and geophysics.   He consulted worldwide, worked for the US Air Force during WWII predicting weather events, served at the Cambridge Research Center, and had an illustrious career engaging, teaching, and monitoring.   It is also noted that Landsberg was skeptical of the risks of man-made global warming, arguing that computer models were unreliable and that the impacts of projected warming would be minor.

Today, we use algorithms to predict future outcomes.   But even an algorithm is only as good as what is included in its feed.   For example, the Bill Gates algorithm for CoVid initially stated that more than 2 million Americans would die of CoVid in the next 3 months.   That was in March/April 2020.   The algorithm was quite off target which then required revisions.   One such revision would be to calculate ALL deaths as CoVid related. The purpose? Bill Gates needed to save face, and he needed the fear of death to bring the chaos.

Yesterday, a ‘weatherperson-girl’ on an obscure station decided that despite her degree in journalism, her weatherperson knowledge qualified her to ‘enlighten’ the world about Climate Change. Of course, specifically, she sought to teach the deniers because none of them understood Climate and she was there to tell everyone while insinuating she was a climatologist.   It was almost as though she felt herself speaking as a goddess, pasting verbatim from NASA onto her page.  But her fans thought her weathergirl status on television made her a climate scientist.

Tree rings are a supposed method of determining climate history but there are few available an none of great history.  The oldest is estimated to be about 9000 years old.   Please note that ‘estimated’ is commonly used by Climate scientists as well as ‘Prediction’.   These terms do NOT denote Fact.   The problem is that in order to read the rings, one must first cut down and kill the tree.   So scientists have decided that would go against the grain and simply now speculate the age.   Not a reliable method at all.

Reading coral is another method that some scientists feel is plausible although most coral dates back only a few hundred years and killing coral is the means.   CHECREEF was a project developed in collaboration with the European Science Foundation. Drilling 1100 meters into water surrounding Tahiti they extracted specimens that they ‘predicted’   were perhaps 14,000 to 16,000 years old.   ESF shuttered its climate work in 2014. This project has yet to provide any analysis.

Ice core reading is the new nouveau. Using lasers to extract annual layers is complicated and chemical testing of these layers is based on the belief that CO2 levels have remained constant forever. The new technology has revealed the flawed nature of conclusions from the previous technology.   Unfortunately science uses preconstructed ends to formulate the beginning.   Much is based on unproven factoids from which is built a new factoid that is constrained by theory.

In the end, Climate Change is a predicted concern.   Pandemics are a predicted concern.   Before Steven Hawking died in 2018, his biggest concern was the threat Scientists posed in experiments at CERN – The God Particle.   Hawking stipulated that the scientists were so brazen and acting outside of rationale, his belief was they would make a huge miscalculation which would result in Earth or even our entire universe being swallowed into a Black Hole. There would be no warning and it could happen in a nanosecond.

Due to the immense energy being created in the CERN Haldron, speculation that the experiments could make major alterations in our planet, while speculative, do exist.   Cloud formations and currents above the facility have shown bizarre patterns, colors and electro magnetic fields. CERN’s magnetic field is 100,000 times that of Earth, and while they claim containment is all within the facility and nothing ever escapes, their own website contradicts this premise. Could this collider and others scattered across the globe be responsible for the quickening movement of Magnetic North?   Could it be the cause of the South Atlantic Anomaly – a radiation belt that leads to an influx of energetic particles which are essentially ‘trapped protons’?

In 2019, CERN was shut down for 3 years due to needed refurbishing given that their climate footprint had greatly impacted global warming, at least that was their media statement:

To perform correctly, some of the LHC’s key equipment relies on gases known to contribute significantly to global warming. These gases are either vented to the atmosphere purposely, or they leak from instruments, making it to the outside air accidentally. CERN scientists are working to reduce the lab’s contributions to climate change by plugging up leaks and, in some equipment, replacing the most pernicious greenhouse gases with less problematic alternatives.

In 2020, CERN was approved $23 billion in funding to build a new collider capable of nearly 10 times the original – smashing protons-protons to generate new particles.   The Collider would envelop an area 62 miles long with a scheduled completion date of around 2038.

Playing with Mother Nature for weather manipulation was nothing compared to Playing With our Entire Universe.

But Hey – It’s Science – So I Guess They Get A Pass to Destroy Our Universe If They Want…

Climate Crisis – The New State of Emergency!

The world according to Garp… or Deutsche Welle in this case, has decided that half of 812 cities surveyed are not prepared for Climate Crisis.   It is no longer Global Warming – it is no longer Climate Change – it is now a “Climate Crisis”!   And the sustainable risks are:   water shortages, heat shortages and disease, as in manufactured variants of SARS. According to “SCIENCE”.

To emphasize their point, a picture shows the image of a man squatting in a landfill filled with birds amidst a backdrop of utility wires and trash.   Apparently cities should all have a ‘climate adaption plan’ in force and ready to implement when Climate crisis occurs.   A written plan.   I doubt there are any cities that have a plan in place, much less in wealthy corridors of California!

However, lest you be overly concerned, our esteemed Congress has created a four point plan for America:   1. Support rapid deployment of wind and solar, 2.   Incentivize more domestic manufacturing of clean energy and zero emissions,   3. Launch new economic sectors to meet climate goals, and 4. Ensure new jobs in clean energy that are high quality and good pay.

The-That’s-It Folks – that’s what is going to save the world! That is the sum total of intellectual prowess that we are supposed to worship!

I wonder if Greta wrote this because it has about as much intellectual and scientific accolade as a 12 year old’s critical understanding!   It is duly embarrassing!

The DW article cites CDP Worldwide as its source for these statements.   Based in the UK, CDP Trustees would appear to be a hodge-podge of individuals from backgrounds including oil & gas, chemicals, hedge funds, and a former Houston mayor. Odd.   No renewable solar gurus mentioned.  And thus we are being lectured by the advocate proponents of Fossil Fuels in admonishing our fossil fuel use!

Lord Adair Turner is a principal advisor at CDP Worldwide.   His plume of knowledge would come from a background at McKinsey, Standard Charter Bank (Rockefeller), and The Institute For New Economic Thinking.   Louis Guthrie brings her advisory services to the organization having graduated from the prestigious Open University aka, George Soros.

The Founders of the Institute For New Economic Thinking include: George Soros, James Basilli and William Janeway. Adair Turner is Board Chair, and Robert Johnson is the President.   Robert Johnson regularly contributes to “NewDeal-2” and is a former currency trader under Soros.   Johnson’s very astute research has determined that “unemployment results in lower tax revenue”.    These people are truly idiotic miscreants.  

The purpose of CDP Worldwide would seem to be the collection of data while giving ‘accreditation’ to those companies and cities that meet their criteria. CDP does not provide internal financial information, nor does it do anything of action.

This is like a elementary school skit of ‘ring around the rosy’.   “Ashes, ashes, we all fall down!”

We are seemingly zip-tied to Rockefeller, Rothschild, Soros and a bunch of idiots too afraid that their identity might be compromised and known!   Which of course, makes them cowering in fear. Fear – Cowards. And yet these cowards would have us believe they are the New Age Rulers of Earth!?   COWARDS>  Heil Hitler…

TEXAS ELECTRIC GRID: A Corporate Enterprise Collapses

Wind power in Texas is privately held. It has absolutely nothing to do with a governor or senator.   The largest farm, Los Vientos, is owned by Duke Energy. The second largest is Roscoe Wind Farm which covers 100,000 acres and is owned by RWE a German company with revenues over $14 billion. It was initially installed in 2008.   Turbines have a typical lifespan of about 18-20 years.   The third largest producer is NextEra Energy, Inc, a major donor to Jeb Bush in the 2016 presidential election.

These private companies lease the land from ranchers and farmers and pay a royalty on their energy production revenues.   Local energy utilities then purchase the power for resale on the grid to customers. Customers have the right to ‘choose’ among a number of alternate utility companies.

But apparently blame has been reduced to red vs blue, republican vs democrat, when in fact the finger pointing is more relevant toward corporate governance. The entire solar/wind phenomena was instituted by corporate agendas for-profit!

Of course, no ginormous mega freeze is allowed to go unchartered without the New York Times spewing blame at global warming.   In an article today, their very scientific knowledge comes from a ‘reporter who focuses on climate’.   In a Question/Answer commentary, John Schwartz, provides his scientific knowledge of how and why polar freezes are caused by warming. Of course, his bio reveals that he has a blast writing humor, technology, space travel as well as science despite absolutely no education background that would qualify him as an expert in anything. By degree, he is a lawyer.

Utility companies are NOT responsible for wind and solar failure either.

CenterPoint Energy:   “There is not enough electricity from third party generators.

Oncor Electric:  Reporting damaged infrastructure due to extreme weather.   “Along with solar and wind, natural gas-fueled micro-turbines, diesel-fueled engines, batteries, and landfill gas are common components of DG”.

Of course, electric cars put an added strain on the grids, and that market may find itself in a flux as the current La Nina’s typical weather pattern lasts anywhere from 2 months to seven years. This estimate of between 2 and 84 months reveals the insanity of climatologists attempting to ‘predict’ anything.   And the level of fraud in claiming global warming is unaccountably wholly criminal. The NOAA acknowledges that future predictions of weather are unreliable and often involve a lot of ‘guesswork’.

WHY wasn’t Texas put on notice weeks before the event?

La Nina is considered the cold phase of weather affecting southern regions of the Pacific.

October 2020, climatologists warned of a severe ENSO phase of La Nina which bends the polar jet stream south. But other factors come into play including volcanic activity which tends to create a deflection of sunlight.   But monitoring these phenomena didn’t even begin until the 1950’s – therefore providing a ‘prediction’ is based on a relatively short span of conditions.

There are 45 volcanoes across the globe with continuous eruptions.   There are currently 23 ongoing volcanic eruptions in: Italy, Guatemala, Russia, US, Indonesia, Japan, Chile, Grenadines, and Papua New Guinea.

Multiple factors contribute to weather anomalies.   But what this Texas outage reveals is that our grids are tenuous and solar and wind are NOT going to replace fossil fuel generation anytime in the near future.   Electric cars are NOT viable unless the grids are amped up significantly.   And further ‘cooling’ of the sun as per the Bill Gates stupidity is on par with a serious terrorist threat.

And fyi:   Synthetic meat is made from dead cows cells.   Where will they get cows in order to cultivate those cells?   What is the nutrient value of synthetic GMO meat?   Can a person’s system process those GMO chemicals? NONE of these questions have been answered at all.

Once again the mental IQ acuity of Bill Gates is more and more questionable and less and less reliable.   I’ve lowered my estimate from 100 to 90.

Alternative Energy: Antiquity of Wind & Solar. Nuclear Fusion – The Future

As the Global Freeze encapsulated large swathes of countries, a sour lesson was learned with regard to so-called “Alternative Energy”.   Despite All The Kings Men putting together the best scientists and engineers to build Wind Turbines and Solar Panels, somehow it didn’t occur to them that snow and ice might bring them all to a complete dysfunctional halt.   Frozen turbine blades required de-icing by helicopters fueled by gas, too little too late. And solar panels went black, buried in snow.

The first windmill was created in Persia in the 9th century.   The first use of solar power can be traced to sometime around 400 BC.

Respectively, 1200 and 2400 years later, this is the best solution that science has been able to provide. They are flawed and they are ancient methods.     And scientists should be ashamed.

In 1954, the CERN laboratory was created to study Nuclear Research via particle fusion.   It took them over 50 years before they completed the construction of the Large Hadron Collider which came to be known as The God Particle.   Steven Hawking believed that the Collider was capable of creating a black hole large enough to suck the entire universe into it destroying mankind.   Thus the thematic God Particle.  Thus Hawking was not simply skeptical – but considered scientists – rather stupid.

The Cern experiments include nuclear fusion as an alternative energy source, creating blackholes, determining how the universe was created, and time travel.

Nuclear Fusion is the forerunner for a number of startups funded by Gates, Bezos, Jack Ma, etc…, that are attempting to formulate that energy into a viable alternative sometime in 2030 or beyond.   Until that time, we really have no other alternative which makes shutting down oil, gas and coal just ‘stupid’.

The ultimate concept of fusion is that the power would be so condensed in form that one glass of water would provide all the heat and electricity for one person’s lifetime.   It is noncombustible.   It is clean.   It is not a resource.   It is infinite.   But it is at best 10 years in the future.

By contrast, the average home requires upwards of 20 solar panels. Of course that average would not apply to Bill Gates and the Hollywood Climatologists given their homes are roughly ten times larger. Note: Bill Gates homes do NOT utilize solar.

Those same solar panels have a lifetime, as do wind turbines, which roughly equates to about 18-20 years.   At which point they are useless and must be buried in the graveyards.

It is estimated that by 2050 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have been buried.   To put that into perspective, the average capacity of a landfill is – one gate ton.   There are currently 1250 landfills in the US.  Where oh where are we supposed to put the other 77,998,750 tons?

I am not sure how these rabid scientists and engineers anticipate the reality.  But their IQ would appear to be on par with – stupid.

There are currently about 60,000 wind turbines in the US.   Many have already reached their lifespan and are dead.   Most of these 60,000 will be defunct by 2030.   These turbines would require 450,000 cubic yards of landfill for burial.

It is estimated that without either solar or wind turbines consuming landfill capacity in the US, in 16 years – or by 2037, the US landfills will be at full capacity. And like every other country we will begin dumping our waste into the oceans.

What oh what will environmentalists say then?

So what exactly have scientists been doing for the past 2400 freaking years?

Science did not translate to technology and godlike proportions until relatively perhaps 200 years ago.   Prior to that they didn’t do a whole lot of self righteous ego calamities given science was on par with – philosophy.   Like Plato.   Or Aristotle.

Doctors and such have only elevated their professions to the nth degree in the last 100 years!

Pharma has only existed for about 80 years.

In the span of reality – they are infants.

And according to the very esteemed Steven Hawking, scientists could be the impetus to the annihilation of the entire universe and mankind in their inflated ego and recklessness.

But the mantra of the liberal elite and the 8th grade Hollywood climatologists is “Follow The Science”.

Why?

Simply, to replace God.

Why?

Because as long as people adhere to, and believe in, and have faith in, God, they can not be cowered, usurped, controlled, and devoured into the pits of communism.   And communism is an empty soul. A robotic deviance without creativity, desire, individualism, humanity, space, compassion and love. Under communism, humans revert to animal wherein their only focus is survival.   Food. Shelter.   Propagation.   And the world becomes as it was in the Beginning.

Nuclear Fusion would appear to be an amazing future source of energy.   To be sure!   But given it is a decade away at least, a prudent economist would acknowledge that destroying what is viable today thus creating a void of energy – is simply – STUPID.

BILL GATES: A MATRIX OF ONE – desperate to heal a flailing image

Bill Gates seems desperate to do ‘damage control’ over his spiraling reputation.   As his new book is released discussing his infinite intellect, mass vaccination programs, and every growing wealth despite his bizarre philanthropic efforts, the truth behind the matrix of his reality is ripped.

In an interview with MSM, Gates giggles about his ‘massively high carbon footprint’ explaining it off – justifying it – and claiming that since a ghost writer wrote his book, he has only now become aware of his own carbon footprint.    This most definitely does not sound like the mental acuity of a genius.   It sounds more like a Porky Pig rendition of stutter.

He states that he will fully offset his families 6 jet emissions by 2021.   And here we are confronted with the matrix.   “Offset” does NOT mean he will use Sustainable Jet Fuels as the article states, ‘offset’ means – balance.   As in ‘doing something that diminishes the effect of the contrary’.  In other words, Gates has absolutely no intention whatsoever of diminishing his footprint.   Because, like John Kerry, he deserves to pollute as much as he likes.

Sustainable jet fuels are in their infancy stage of research.   Boeing ‘hopes’ to have commercial jets using these alternative fuels by  sometime in 2030.  Of course, “Hope” means it could happen or it could not – much like Merkel claiming in 2016 that Germany would be carbon zero, then it was by 2020, then 2030, now 2050 – well after she will be dead.   The largest issue right now is purely cost.

Gates further justifies that as he and his cabal of elites promote green standards for everyone else to abide by he is investing in those types of companies. Matrix:   Gates will increase his wealth with a potential market value according to the World Economic forum of $55 trillion in green industries.  Investing is wealth promotion – nothing more.

The MSM article quotes Anne Thiel as an expert on carbon emissions and dioxide.   Mz Thiel holds her degree in German Studies and is a ‘trained midwife’ who currently works as a communications manager for Verra in DC.  Really, that’s their expert.

Further the article states Gates is idolized for his 2015 initiative umbrella organization “Breakthrough Energy” which boasts such investors as Bezos, Soros, Steyer, Benioff, Prince Alwaleed, Bloomberg, Jack Ma, etc…   Six years later, other than raise money, the company has actually done nothing but promote ‘concern’ while ‘Investing” in high technology startups.   But highlighting Gates huge ego of transforming health, education and public welfare around the world is the market strategy of the article.   Matrix.

The companies Breakthrough is investing in do have interesting innovations:

*Commonwealth Fusion Systems: builds superconducting magnets using nitrol wire technology.   These magnets can produce levitation without corresponding heat so as to propel trains.   The first ARC fusion reactor is slated to be built by 2026 using these magnetic conductors.

*Lilac Solutions: which develops lithium for electric batteries

Plant Based Food Products, Metal Mining, a motorbike delivery service in Africa, SmartMeter which aims to bring grid management and utilities rural Africa and Asia, etc…  these are the ‘investments’ which will garner Gate’s even more vast – wealth.

MATRIX: Investing in new technology companies and capitalizing on their profits will offset a personal carbon footprint that is massive. NO!

If I am terribly obese and I invest money in various vitamin companies, will that make me less obese? According to Gate’s logic, the answer would be – yes.

But Gate’s is concerned that his hypocrisy is hurting his image and thus he creates interviews with scripts pre-written to promote his humble sweetness and philanthropic compassion.

Scouring the internet for mention of the thousands of maimed and dead children in India as a direct result of Gate’s polio vaccine is another means for creating a false truth.  For Gates, rewriting and erasing facts is paramount.  It is a direct correlation to ego and hypocrisy. And once again, Gate’s true intellect bears examination and questioning.

In the midst of questioning the relative intelligence of this high school graduate, Gates continues to support the attempt to ‘geo-engineer’ weather by shooting particles into the atmosphere so as to deflect the rays of the sun.   Of course, this idea is gaining less and less traction as the US, Russia, and the EU are inundated in frigid temperatures, ice storms, and heavy snow well below normal.  In parts of the US, temperatures have dipped 30’-50’ below normal averages.  Not exactly conducive to the notion of – Global Warming!

I imagine even the history of temperatures will soon be altered to correlate with his need to advance this fake agenda for the $55 trillion waiting in the wings.

Perhaps, Bill Gates would better serve his ego, if he simply defined his investments in terms of ‘New Technology’ instead of the infamous New Green Deal.   But then in so doing, he might inadvertently ‘spread the wealth’ which is quite contrarian to his need for hoarding $$$$$$$$$$ for himself and his ‘buddies’.

According to Sustainability For All, it isn’t about reducing emissions at all – so much as it is about reducing plebe demand, or desire.   The means of which are to make travel more costly, meat more costly, housing more costly, thereby increasing the chasm of Thee and Me.

Currently, there are over 213,000 commercial jets and upwards of 6000-7000 private jets owned and operated by the wealthy and Hollywood climate enthusiasts espousing global warming and carbon footprints. Their Matrix of Reality.

Yet somehow the plebes are to blame.

General Dynamics owns Gulfstream, one of the more exclusive private aircraft for the elite.   The CEO and Chairman is Phoebe Novakovic of Serbian descent.   Her career included working for the CIA and the Department of Defense from approximately, 1988 to 2001.   She also serves on the boards of Abbot Labs and JP Morgan Chase as well as Trustee for The Center of Strategic and International Studies.  YIKES>

Other Trustees For CSIS include; Kissinger, Leon Panetta, Paul Ryan, Francis Townsend, as well as CEO’s from Boeing, The Carlyle Group, Harvard, World Wildlife Fund, CBS, FedEx, Forbes, etc.

I don’t think these peoples give a rats DANG about climate Change and are more inclined to aspire toward their true game – Agenda 2030.

There are many things Bill Gates is, but there are far more things that he is not.   Obsessed with money, his initial partners, Paul Allen, Ric Weiland, and Kent Evans seem to have been the brains , the true geeks that were left behind by a narcissistic personality.   Today, they are all dead, and only the rewritten story of Bill Gates remains.

Global Warming – or – Ice Age: Follow The Money

I’ve written about global warming, climate change, chicken little, and ‘deceit’.   I’ve written about the land grabs in Africa, land grabs in South America, and the disparity of our global water supply.   With damaged soil and a lack of water, how can China grow anything?   What if we put all of these separate topics into one pool – what is it telling us?

Starting with deceit, what if global warming isn’t just a hoax but a distraction from a potentially long term cooling effect?   Such a cooling effect could have devastating consequences on water sources and food supplies shifting useable land resources – south.

The last mini ice-age lasted from about 1300 through the 1600’s and forever altered economic and social norms.   Agriculture shifted.   Populations shifted. Scientists believe the temperature dropped a full 2’ during this period.   The same 2’ that scientists now claim earth needs to drop – again.   Demographics forever changed as people moved to warmer crop climates.   But not before mass famine took its toll on the peasants.   During this time of monarchs and warlords, the elite were defined by the foods available to them.   Fresh meat and fish were a staple.   It forebodes the agenda of Bill Gates declaring that food shortages will require modification of the peasant diet.

Ice ages, cooling trends, etc… are not a global equalizer.   The Northern Hemisphere was hit the hardest including; most of Russia, China, Europe, and North America, and the farthest parts of South America.   Africa was hit in mountainous regions predominantly, and the remainder of South America thrived.

Historically, the movement of people around the globe can be directly associated with ever changing weather.   It is believed that northern Africa was lush and green just 5,000 years ago.   It is also believed that changes in sunspots and radiation levels are the source of historical climate shifts.   Co2 is considered a less demonstrable if only minor event but scientists tend to be like sheep following instead of leading.

If in fact earth was entering either a cooling phase or a mini ice-age, shifting resources to South America and Africa would be logical for survival.

Adecoagro is a Luxembourg holding company that purchases agriculture land predominantly in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina.   The largest shareholders include:   Qatar Investments, Route One Investment Company, EMS Capital and Soros Fund Management.

Foreign investment in Africa’s land spiked in the last 2 decades with China taking a shotgun seat.   China’s food consumption and environmental practices have left the country nearly barren. Water was severely depleted which necessitated a deal with Russia for access to the world’s single largest fresh water supply at 23%, Lake Baikal.

If we look at foreign investment as a predictor of global climate, buying land in South Africa and South America is nonsensical – given they will burn up and their land will be useless under the global warming mantra.   While these lands have some protection in the event of a cooling trend, in the event of a warming trend, farmland would become barren, scorched moon craters.

Adding to the fray of inconsistency and/or deceit, the Paris Accord’s Green Fund spends ALL it’s cherished dollars on projects in – Africa and South America. The bulk of the funding is for ‘infrastructure projects’ – the same infrastructure that the new owners of the land need in order to create robust farms and agriculture entities.

When researching data graphs that purport to show the variations in weather over thousands or millions of years, scientists are literally ‘all over the graph’.   There is no consensus other than the fact that earth has been a cataclysmic climate event – forever.   Many attribute previous changes to sunspot activity and radiation activity from the sun.   But actual climate recording dates only to the late 1800’s and accuracy is questionable.   The data is algorithmic – fancy estimations.

Prior to the mini ice-age which began around 1300, scientists logged a global warming trend from about 300 to 800AD. Since the end of the mini ice-age in 1600, the warming trend has been continually upward – meaning a downward trend may be the next phase.

Since the Roman Empire, the Greenland ice temperature is 2’ colder.   And in the last 10,000 years we are significantly colder.   Richard K. Moore provides various graphs and models of the temperature grids during this time frame.   He asserts that the Co2 theory is simply that – a theory without any actual scientific proof.   He claims that the sun, and the astronomy of the planets in our universe provide more conclusive extractive data. In his opinion, the ‘science’ behind global warming is on par with flat earth science.   Evaluating data that can only be verified over a period of a 150 years to make a determination for our future thousands of years in advance has about as much actual factual delineation as the weatherman telling you the sun is shining while outside your window it is raining.   If science can’t get real-time data how the heck can you possibly believe their future predictions?   Because that is how they reference the data – a prediction.  

When science is reduced to predictions and feelings and crystal balls – it becomes relatively worthless. Utilizing restrictive time constraints in analysis of climate data only fuses the faulted conclusion.

According to Climatologist Cliff Harris;   “when solar radiation decreases, and volcanic activity increases, a major drop in temperature can be expected”.   In his analysis, that drop would happen relatively quickly.   According to his research, in 1000 BC a mass exodus of Hebrews from Egypt was caused by a warming event that spiked around 1100 BC – at which point the temperature was nearly double what it was in 2000 AD –  before falling into an ice-age.

China has been systematically securing not just intellectual property, and mobilizing monopoly policies on pharma and retail, but food and water supplies have been of paramount importance for its population.   South Africa and South America have been their focus.

When looking at the ‘actions’ of those who govern the world’s money supply, global output, investment, and net worth, they have basically pledged everything on two continents that would burn to the ground in a global warming trend….   That is the deceit.  

Climate Change: A Global Geo-Engineering Experiment

Weather modification used to be considered a ‘conspiracy theory’, but like many other conspiracies, today it is acknowledged as fact.   From the simplistic to the complex, the concept has many useful positives;   increasing water supplies, preventing hail and hurricanes, and dousing wildfires. But there are also useful military objectives which are more cynical and deadly in their agenda.

While climate gurus continue to scream ‘the sky is falling’, Harvard has been busily at work the past two years geo-engineering weather thru solar deflection.

China has been manufacturing cloud rain for over a decade, launching silver iodide with rockets and via planes across swathes of the Tibetan Tableau the size of Alaska, the project is considered the largest in the world.

ScoPex is the Harvard experiment which includes the introduction of particles in the stratosphere in order to deflect solar activity away from earth.   According to NASA, such a scheme could devastate agriculture.   The argument in support of the program is that the positive effects out-weigh the negative impacts.   I disagree.

Harvard contends that rising sea levels as a result of global warming will decimate valuable land and millions of homes. The analogy is to ‘chemotherapy’.   But even the analogy is flawed given that chemo only works on some people some of the time.   By contrast, geo-engineering has been shown to have substantial impacts on weather intensity, weather patterns, and rainfall.

The same issues that the alarmists are now claiming are a result of global warming could in fact be the result of saving the planet from climate change.   Perhaps the very technology utilized across the globe to alter weather is actually responsible for creating intensely destructive weather.  For example our jet streams are linked to solar radiation, change the solar you alter the jet stream.  Air masses push the jet stream around, change the air mass and you have effectively altered the weather pattern.  The jet stream pattern has only been monitored since 2000, so identifying changes is only as good as the record exists.  But obviously if we suddenly begin inserting particle matter to deflect the sun, the jet stream will be affected.

It stands to reason that geo-engineering and cloud seeding may have far more disruptive ramifications than scientists are willing to reveal.  I refer to it as the ‘oops factor’.

While one justification for the manipulation is for the purpose of redirecting or eliminating hurricanes, it is just as likely that the modification could ramp up these storms as well.   While Harvard and China represent just two specific projects that are currently being utilized, there are likely hundreds being employed by various nations – none in collaboration with another.

India uses small planes equipped with twelve cylinders. Flying into the belly of a storm cloud, the cylinders are filled with combustible chloride and released at intervals. With agriculture in India failing from lack of water, the Harvard geo-engineering experiment could cause India’s production to fail completely from lack of sunlight.

It is less like chemotherapy and more like a Molotov cocktail.

While scientists had polar views on the effect of geo-engineering, Harvard ignored the negative reactions and sent up its first flood of particulates in early spring 2019.

And despite all the information available regarding these various geo-engineering actions, the media is still attempting to manipulate our understanding of the true cause and causal actions taking place.

“July was earth’s hottest month on record”! The articles go on to actually explain that the ‘record’ they refer to is for the 20th century.  In the realm of millions of years, a century is relatively meaningless.

Historically, temperatures were taken manually on land and ships at sea. There were no computers, no standardized measurement system, no sophisticated instruments like we use today.   All statistical science has margins of error.   But climate scientists fail to provide that margin – ever. In fact, determining temperatures historically did not even include tenths of percentages.   Thus to calculate that the global temperature rose by .7’ between 1850 and 2003 could not be factual, it would be a theory. An estimate. As of today, that estimate is .8% based on unproven science that has changed dramatically in its ability to create an accurate model.

In theory, the enhancement of global temperature could align with the advancement of weather manipulation and geo-engineering just as easily as claiming the casual factor is carbon emissions.

According to scientists, the last ice age ended between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago. That would indicate a potential deviation of 10,000 years – not terribly accurate.   Scientists claim that the reason the ice age ended was due to a rise in carbon dioxide.   Volcanic eruptions create vast plumes of carbon dioxide.   Volcanoes exist both on land and undersea. There have been 404 volcanic eruptions since 1883.   Since 1980 – there have been 18 volcanic eruptions with a rating of at least VEI of 4.

It is estimated that 200 million tons of carbon are emit into the atmosphere annually by volcanic action.

But even this data is an extrapolation, not a fact.   Still it has widely been the accepted causal factor that pulled earth out of its last ice age. Why? Because science has no other explanation.

In other words: based on massive extrapolations, estimates, best guesses, faulty science, and zero historical technology, science has concluded that our planet needs geo-engineering of our natural climate change in order to ‘save the planet’ and ‘save the children’.

And in so doing – may actually wipe out large swathes of agriculture production in order to save a few estimated millions of houses many of which are built of mud and clay.

Global Climate Strikes: The New Cult

The Climate Debate seems to consist largely of Chicken Little arguments made by non-scientists, and sometimes by – children, aka Greta.   Case in point. An article in The Guardian, written by an unnamed source, makes some rather heated statements as fact that are completely fictitious and unscientific.  

But then it is the journalistic trend to create fabricated information:

The Guardian Chicken Little opening statement: “The level of CO2 has been rising since the industrial revolution and is now at its highest for about 4 million years.”

If Co2 levels have been steadily rising for 4 million years, it sort of eradicates the belief that the rise is man-made. But even more interesting is the relationship of Co2 to temperature because we have been in a cooling trend for about 10,000 years while the CO2 levels have been steadily rising. That’s not how it is supposed to work.

We also know that over the last 4 million years the earth has experienced various ice ages – meaning the correlation between CO2 and temperature is not a parallel science. Historical levels of CO2 are calculated by measuring Ice cores.   While ice cores hold information, the information is predicated on a particular latitude and is not representative of the entire earth. In fact, scientists have found that climate change in the northern hemisphere is quite different from the southern hemisphere.   So averages are a misnomer.

El Nino and La Nina have only been charted for the last 60 years. The climate has only been charted since the mid 1800’s.   Hurricane activity has been charted since 1851 – That’s a mere 168 years in the span of millions!

All other historical data has been theorized. Which is why scientists cannot agree – they each have their ‘theory’. We cannot possibly ‘know with certainty’ what happened 4 million years ago any more than we can 10,000 years ago.   But it makes for good Chicken Little journalism to – pretend.

For example, here is another ‘theory’:   “…recent research has shown that the solar wind, driven by solar eruptions (flares and coronal mass ejections) and plasma flux emanating from coronal holes, has a stronger impact on climate phenomena either directly or by modulating galactic cosmic rays.” 

According to another scientist, Javier, the earth’s obliquity and solar insulation angles are the main drivers of climate which is why changes have been manifested for millions of years without human interaction. In fact, according to Javier, the earth has been experiencing a cooling trend since 8000 BCE, and these trends typically manifest over a 41,000 year cycle.

If anything, that would mean that if human mismanagement is causing warming, then we are actually postponing the next ice age!

Guardian statement #2: “As a result of global warming and rising sea levels, 1 in 5 people in the world will eventually see their cities submerged.”

Over the last 200 years, sea levels have risen about 16 centimeters (roughly 6 inches). But historical time frames can be misleading.   If you view decades, centuries, or even a thousand years, the reference does not equate.   For example, many scientists argue that the change in climate over the past 100 years is ‘more rapid’ than historical data and therefore is man-made. They support this argument with a graph indicating various changes over the last century.   The statement; “global climate change is happening faster now than in any other point of modern civilization”.

  1. When did modern civilization begin?

Apparently, there isn’t a clear definition or time capsule that can be attributed to modern civilization.   Some reference 3200 BC, others reference the 19th century. But its definition is important because it is used to create a scientific statement that is relevant to climate change. Yet it is fraught with vagueness.

Recent, modern history is packed with droughts, mini-ice ages, and societies that fled their conditions; the Mayans, Easter Islanders, Sumerians, Vikings, etc.. What did they do? They fled. They went to higher ground. They moved. Today, we stubbornly remain in areas that are no longer suitable and whine. It all comes down to trying to fit a square peg in a circular hole.

According to recent ice core data corroborated as of 2012;  “During all episodes of major global ice loss, sea level rise has reached rates of at least 1.2 metres per century (equivalent to 12 mm per year). This is 4 times the current rate of sea level rise.”

Since 1870 polar warming has caused a steady rise in sea levels as ice melts and the warmer seas expand.

The rise and fall of sea levels has been scientifically deemed to be a direct response to the earth’s orbit. The warming trend is believed to have come to an end 10,000 years ago or 8000BC. While graphics provide slightly different +/- in terms of 1000-2000 years, even if we look at a graphic provided by NASA and NOAA the last ice age ended 16,000 years ago and the increase in global temperature rose from 42 to 58 within 2000 years before leveling somewhat and rising to 61 3000 years ago and sits now at 60.   Well before the Industrial Revolution!

http://www.internetlooks.com/globaltemperaturedegflast25000yr.jpg

In the end maybe Greta would be better served getting an education, gaining real knowledge, researching supportive data, and serving where pollution is greatest – China.

CLIMATE Change: The Crystal Ball Theory

As Climate Changes, the media is all a frenzy with more dire predictions, more exhaustive data, and little scientific truth.

I am always thrilled to discover that climate science is reportedly a 50-50 chance crystal ball venue.   If climatologists can’t accurately predict the weather within fifteen minutes of its event, how can we really accept that they know exactly what happened six hundred billion years ago and 1000 years into the future?

The answer is in the word ‘science’ which until recent history was defined as a philosophy, a ‘prediction’.

When the data was disproven over and over again, global warming morphed into ‘Climate Change’. And no one missed a beat. Except for the fact that climate does change, and likely has since the existence of earth, so making the shift opened a truism, but not necessarily one that supported doomsday.

So what’s the real beef?   Why the paranoia alarms?

It’s complicated.

Like most wars, climate change created a mass chaotic frenzy that resulted in a select group of elite benefactors making beaucoup dollero on the heels of fear.   When a war is over, history typically reveals the ridiculous reasoning for instigating the war in the first place.   WWI some stupid ArchDuke guy was assassinated – and thus 100 million + people had to pay with their lives.   But within that catastrophic event billions were made.   When there isn’t a good war, invent a catastrophe: hence Global Warming aka Climate Change.

After WWII, there was the Korean War, Vietnam War, and then when that was tabled, we were catapulted into the Chicken Little Science of the coming ‘Ice-Age’! It made for massive paranoia, and mucho dollero before fizzling and being shelved in the library of science stupidity and oops factor. Never mind.

In a world replete in fake wars, fake catastrophes, fake news, fake media, and fake religion, one would think that we would become immune and realize the one absolute question:   who is making money off the fakery?

In 1977 Time Magazine published a cover piece titled, “How To Survive The Coming Ice-Age.” It offered 51 things one can do to make a difference. And while the media is desperately attempting to justify the trend, the article, the chaotic fear that was instigated, they refuse to take responsibility for – lying. Instead, they are today busily trying to defend these doomsday scenarios as simply a media creation.

Huh?   The media fabricated a story without Scientific justification? How dastardly!

There was the nuclear war scare in the 1960’s wherein children were instructed to hide under their desks so as to circumvent the effects of the imminent nuclear bomb… And we all diligently went thru the drills believing that hiding under a desk would save us from death.

Each generation creates a ‘boogey-man’.

But the impact, the force, the deliberation and contempt exuded by our media for The People continues to be the real ‘boogey man’.   And likely, history will attempt to justify the current obsession with “Climate Change”.

Yes. Climate Changes.   In fact, graphs created by these same scientific onions graph climate for billions of years based on – gasp – tree rings, and then spew it as a truism. Really, that’s all you’ve been able to utilize for your pseudo science theory?

Why do they create a boogey-man at all?

Simplistically it reverts to basic psychology; united we stand, divided we fall. If they can create a united demon, they can control the meme.   Of course, this can be done by both good guys and bad guys and therein lies the fix.   Who to believe?

The media altered the landscape when it became the most corrupt of outlets that we could possibly imagine. The propaganda and psychological ploy was honed.   And a vast portion of society willingly jumped aboard the bandwagon.

Hollywood became enamored with this political power given they had already usurped the moral and ethical power over their subjects. And besides, there was money to be made on the sidelines as one jettisoned about creating a massive global ‘footprint’.

But it does get a bit more complicated.

Most of the world’s greatest country’s have implemented their own version of climate manipulation for decades. Fundamentally altering the natural course of nature, we have inadvertently created a monster – a Frankenstein. In order to deflect that oops factor, Global Warming frenzy was the best means of the Porky Pig routine, “bede, bede, bede”.   Shift the blame, make money on the shift, and by the time society figures it out, I’ll be dead.   Whew!

Even as I write this, the weather forecast for my town has changed five times – for today.   SO much for science. I suggest they need to dust their crystal balls and ask the birds.