SCIENCE: Ice Age or Global Warming… Pick A Scientist

DNA.   While many believe their DNA traces them to Africa, this is largely an assumption based science, and not a factual based science.   Classic DNA assumes each parent represents 50% of two parents.   But the further back you go the less accurate is the science.   Classic DNA tests for ancestry are simply another sales tool of assumptions – claiming 300 to 1100 years of ‘accuracy’.  

When conducting DNA testing, science starts with the assumption that all homo sapiens evolved from Africa. In fact, the assumption is that all homo sapiens DNA originated from one African ancestor 115,000 years ago!   Oddly, this dating to 115,000 years ago coincides with the assumption of the last great Ice Age which lasted from 115,000 years ago to roughly 10,000 years ago.

Alas, some scientists believe the Ice Age never ended and has been going on for 40 million years, or maybe 2.5 million years…   In other words, science is not a factual detail of data, it is a thought built on maybe’s, could have been, likely, in theory, suppositions, and – I have an idea… And literally no two scientists will agree on much of anything.

According to Mark Thomas, professor of evolutionary genetics in London, “Tracing ancestry beyond 300 years is futile as you only directly inherit DNA from a small fraction of your ancestors – the others are called ‘pedigree ancestors.”

The first known human was Lucy dated 3.2 million years ago.   The first homo erectus was dated as of 2 million years ago.   The means used to date Lucy was based on volcanic ash sediment 8 and 1 meter below her bone fragment using the argon-argon technique.   Radioactive decay rates are based on the last 60 years of changes.   Using this rate, all techniques calculate a linear rate equal to this ratio.   Lucy was not dated, the volcanic ash beneath her bone fragment was. The assumption being that for 3.2 million years her bone never moved from this position or place…

The Point.

Today we are told that literally everything science tells us is an absolute fact even though 20-30,000 other scientists disagree. In fact, there may be 30,000 or more versions of the same ‘fact’.   So which ‘fact’ do we believe?   Because in reality, there is no such thing as a consensus – either a fact is a fact or it is not! It can not be a sortof fact or a maybe fact, or a I think it might be fact.

But that is exactly what we are fed through our propaganda feeding tubes.

Deutsche Welle, citing activists, world leaders and society, is today responding to an IPCC report which states, ‘…something has to change…’.   WOW – what a scientifically researched analysis!

Why? Why does something have to change?   Because earth is heating up to extreme and everyone will die. Using the ever scientific authority of Greta Thunberg, an 18 year old high school dropout with multiple mental issues, she states, “…it (IPCC Report) is a solid summary of the current best available science”.     OUCH!   Scientists are cringing!

And then there is the most authoritarian scientist, John Kerry, stating “The science has been certain for decades,…”  As in 2 decades – because prior to that scientists were absolutely positively convinced we were heading into another apocalyptic Ice Age…

But “Science” tells us we are at the end of a warming trend and the next Ice Age is only years away. In fact, earth’s entire existence is only periodically impregnated with life only to be absorbed into the next deep freeze for millions of years. The primary reason? A change in earth’s axis – according to science.  That axis change is reverse polarization which we are undergoing more rapidly – now.

So which ‘science’ is accurate? The science according to Greta? Or the science according to Scientists?

Friederike Otto, is the climate expert Deutsche Welle cited as determining that climate change today is 100% human caused.   Her expertise is attributable to her PhD in ‘the philosophy of science’.   Her goal is stipulated to be to validate climate models in order to prove that current conditions are human caused.    In other words she begins with her end result and works backward to prove her claim.

These ‘experts’ do not research climate history, causes of historical ice ages, volcanic and planetary shifts, or ANY historical data whatsoever and instead look for accreditation and media attention for their unsupported opinions that supplant Science with Quackery.

The language these organizations espouse when bolstering their acclaim is revealing in their end-game wordplay:   1. We use peer reviewed science, 2.   Our team believes that careful science based assessment is valuable,   3.   We apply a unique scientific approach, 4.   Through extensive liberal media engagement we have helped change the conversation…

One such Project from Otto’s organization, World Weather Attribution, is working within modeling in association with climateprediction.net.   Prediction!?   WWA believes that Probabilistic Event Attribution is valuable in proving humans caused global warming.

Probabilistic references – algorithms.   When algorithms go HAYWIRE:   1.   In the UK algorithms were used to generate students grades when they were not in school during coVid!   Aka, the input was meager and the output was ‘predicted’.   2.   Bill Gates CoVid modeling algorithm predicted that over 2 million Americans would die of CoVid the first 3 months and over 33 million worldwide – sending massive panic!   3.   ‘experts’ claimed that CoVid would be more deadly than the Spanish Flu which killed over 50million.   According to Fauci – the Spanish flu was neither Spanish nor a flu – but the result of a tainted vaccine mandated by the Rockefeller Institute which induced bacterial pneumonia.

Experts would appear to have the expertise of Greta. As we build toward the end of a warm era and face the next Ice Age, historically, North America and Europe will be an ice sheet – whereas South Africa and South America will be the most habitable.   Basing our means of survival on 60 years of tainted modeling and false algorithms is like premeditated murder.

But it would explain why driving chaos in South Africa so as to vacate the premises for future colonization would appear to be the Present Day Algorithm!

CLIMATE CHANGE: Measuring Historical Impacts and Creating BlackHoles with CERN

HOW many Scientists are there in the world?   HOW many Climate Scientists are there in the world?   Apparently no one actually knows, and the guesstimates range from 11,000 to 7 million Scientists in total. Quite a spread!   Imagine playing those spreads on the stock market buying shares?   Laughable right?   Yet given that no one knows how many there are, how is it possible to have a consensus of 97%?

Well, it’s not.

The first problem in this statistic is the fact that Climate Science Degree programs were only first introduced around 2009.   Climate Science or climatology is defined as the study of weather conditions averaged over a period of time.   After the invention of the thermometer and a global commonality of measurement of temperature in 1742, recording of temperatures became the first physical account – albeit it was not universally utilized. That would amount to 280 years of actual temperature recordings on a sporadical basis.

The statistical analysis of climate was first used in the 1950’s by Helmut Landsberg. His schooling was in physics, mathematics and geophysics.   He consulted worldwide, worked for the US Air Force during WWII predicting weather events, served at the Cambridge Research Center, and had an illustrious career engaging, teaching, and monitoring.   It is also noted that Landsberg was skeptical of the risks of man-made global warming, arguing that computer models were unreliable and that the impacts of projected warming would be minor.

Today, we use algorithms to predict future outcomes.   But even an algorithm is only as good as what is included in its feed.   For example, the Bill Gates algorithm for CoVid initially stated that more than 2 million Americans would die of CoVid in the next 3 months.   That was in March/April 2020.   The algorithm was quite off target which then required revisions.   One such revision would be to calculate ALL deaths as CoVid related. The purpose? Bill Gates needed to save face, and he needed the fear of death to bring the chaos.

Yesterday, a ‘weatherperson-girl’ on an obscure station decided that despite her degree in journalism, her weatherperson knowledge qualified her to ‘enlighten’ the world about Climate Change. Of course, specifically, she sought to teach the deniers because none of them understood Climate and she was there to tell everyone while insinuating she was a climatologist.   It was almost as though she felt herself speaking as a goddess, pasting verbatim from NASA onto her page.  But her fans thought her weathergirl status on television made her a climate scientist.

Tree rings are a supposed method of determining climate history but there are few available an none of great history.  The oldest is estimated to be about 9000 years old.   Please note that ‘estimated’ is commonly used by Climate scientists as well as ‘Prediction’.   These terms do NOT denote Fact.   The problem is that in order to read the rings, one must first cut down and kill the tree.   So scientists have decided that would go against the grain and simply now speculate the age.   Not a reliable method at all.

Reading coral is another method that some scientists feel is plausible although most coral dates back only a few hundred years and killing coral is the means.   CHECREEF was a project developed in collaboration with the European Science Foundation. Drilling 1100 meters into water surrounding Tahiti they extracted specimens that they ‘predicted’   were perhaps 14,000 to 16,000 years old.   ESF shuttered its climate work in 2014. This project has yet to provide any analysis.

Ice core reading is the new nouveau. Using lasers to extract annual layers is complicated and chemical testing of these layers is based on the belief that CO2 levels have remained constant forever. The new technology has revealed the flawed nature of conclusions from the previous technology.   Unfortunately science uses preconstructed ends to formulate the beginning.   Much is based on unproven factoids from which is built a new factoid that is constrained by theory.

In the end, Climate Change is a predicted concern.   Pandemics are a predicted concern.   Before Steven Hawking died in 2018, his biggest concern was the threat Scientists posed in experiments at CERN – The God Particle.   Hawking stipulated that the scientists were so brazen and acting outside of rationale, his belief was they would make a huge miscalculation which would result in Earth or even our entire universe being swallowed into a Black Hole. There would be no warning and it could happen in a nanosecond.

Due to the immense energy being created in the CERN Haldron, speculation that the experiments could make major alterations in our planet, while speculative, do exist.   Cloud formations and currents above the facility have shown bizarre patterns, colors and electro magnetic fields. CERN’s magnetic field is 100,000 times that of Earth, and while they claim containment is all within the facility and nothing ever escapes, their own website contradicts this premise. Could this collider and others scattered across the globe be responsible for the quickening movement of Magnetic North?   Could it be the cause of the South Atlantic Anomaly – a radiation belt that leads to an influx of energetic particles which are essentially ‘trapped protons’?

In 2019, CERN was shut down for 3 years due to needed refurbishing given that their climate footprint had greatly impacted global warming, at least that was their media statement:

To perform correctly, some of the LHC’s key equipment relies on gases known to contribute significantly to global warming. These gases are either vented to the atmosphere purposely, or they leak from instruments, making it to the outside air accidentally. CERN scientists are working to reduce the lab’s contributions to climate change by plugging up leaks and, in some equipment, replacing the most pernicious greenhouse gases with less problematic alternatives.

In 2020, CERN was approved $23 billion in funding to build a new collider capable of nearly 10 times the original – smashing protons-protons to generate new particles.   The Collider would envelop an area 62 miles long with a scheduled completion date of around 2038.

Playing with Mother Nature for weather manipulation was nothing compared to Playing With our Entire Universe.

But Hey – It’s Science – So I Guess They Get A Pass to Destroy Our Universe If They Want…