CLIMATE CHANGE: Measuring Historical Impacts and Creating BlackHoles with CERN

HOW many Scientists are there in the world?   HOW many Climate Scientists are there in the world?   Apparently no one actually knows, and the guesstimates range from 11,000 to 7 million Scientists in total. Quite a spread!   Imagine playing those spreads on the stock market buying shares?   Laughable right?   Yet given that no one knows how many there are, how is it possible to have a consensus of 97%?

Well, it’s not.

The first problem in this statistic is the fact that Climate Science Degree programs were only first introduced around 2009.   Climate Science or climatology is defined as the study of weather conditions averaged over a period of time.   After the invention of the thermometer and a global commonality of measurement of temperature in 1742, recording of temperatures became the first physical account – albeit it was not universally utilized. That would amount to 280 years of actual temperature recordings on a sporadical basis.

The statistical analysis of climate was first used in the 1950’s by Helmut Landsberg. His schooling was in physics, mathematics and geophysics.   He consulted worldwide, worked for the US Air Force during WWII predicting weather events, served at the Cambridge Research Center, and had an illustrious career engaging, teaching, and monitoring.   It is also noted that Landsberg was skeptical of the risks of man-made global warming, arguing that computer models were unreliable and that the impacts of projected warming would be minor.

Today, we use algorithms to predict future outcomes.   But even an algorithm is only as good as what is included in its feed.   For example, the Bill Gates algorithm for CoVid initially stated that more than 2 million Americans would die of CoVid in the next 3 months.   That was in March/April 2020.   The algorithm was quite off target which then required revisions.   One such revision would be to calculate ALL deaths as CoVid related. The purpose? Bill Gates needed to save face, and he needed the fear of death to bring the chaos.

Yesterday, a ‘weatherperson-girl’ on an obscure station decided that despite her degree in journalism, her weatherperson knowledge qualified her to ‘enlighten’ the world about Climate Change. Of course, specifically, she sought to teach the deniers because none of them understood Climate and she was there to tell everyone while insinuating she was a climatologist.   It was almost as though she felt herself speaking as a goddess, pasting verbatim from NASA onto her page.  But her fans thought her weathergirl status on television made her a climate scientist.

Tree rings are a supposed method of determining climate history but there are few available an none of great history.  The oldest is estimated to be about 9000 years old.   Please note that ‘estimated’ is commonly used by Climate scientists as well as ‘Prediction’.   These terms do NOT denote Fact.   The problem is that in order to read the rings, one must first cut down and kill the tree.   So scientists have decided that would go against the grain and simply now speculate the age.   Not a reliable method at all.

Reading coral is another method that some scientists feel is plausible although most coral dates back only a few hundred years and killing coral is the means.   CHECREEF was a project developed in collaboration with the European Science Foundation. Drilling 1100 meters into water surrounding Tahiti they extracted specimens that they ‘predicted’   were perhaps 14,000 to 16,000 years old.   ESF shuttered its climate work in 2014. This project has yet to provide any analysis.

Ice core reading is the new nouveau. Using lasers to extract annual layers is complicated and chemical testing of these layers is based on the belief that CO2 levels have remained constant forever. The new technology has revealed the flawed nature of conclusions from the previous technology.   Unfortunately science uses preconstructed ends to formulate the beginning.   Much is based on unproven factoids from which is built a new factoid that is constrained by theory.

In the end, Climate Change is a predicted concern.   Pandemics are a predicted concern.   Before Steven Hawking died in 2018, his biggest concern was the threat Scientists posed in experiments at CERN – The God Particle.   Hawking stipulated that the scientists were so brazen and acting outside of rationale, his belief was they would make a huge miscalculation which would result in Earth or even our entire universe being swallowed into a Black Hole. There would be no warning and it could happen in a nanosecond.

Due to the immense energy being created in the CERN Haldron, speculation that the experiments could make major alterations in our planet, while speculative, do exist.   Cloud formations and currents above the facility have shown bizarre patterns, colors and electro magnetic fields. CERN’s magnetic field is 100,000 times that of Earth, and while they claim containment is all within the facility and nothing ever escapes, their own website contradicts this premise. Could this collider and others scattered across the globe be responsible for the quickening movement of Magnetic North?   Could it be the cause of the South Atlantic Anomaly – a radiation belt that leads to an influx of energetic particles which are essentially ‘trapped protons’?

In 2019, CERN was shut down for 3 years due to needed refurbishing given that their climate footprint had greatly impacted global warming, at least that was their media statement:

To perform correctly, some of the LHC’s key equipment relies on gases known to contribute significantly to global warming. These gases are either vented to the atmosphere purposely, or they leak from instruments, making it to the outside air accidentally. CERN scientists are working to reduce the lab’s contributions to climate change by plugging up leaks and, in some equipment, replacing the most pernicious greenhouse gases with less problematic alternatives.

In 2020, CERN was approved $23 billion in funding to build a new collider capable of nearly 10 times the original – smashing protons-protons to generate new particles.   The Collider would envelop an area 62 miles long with a scheduled completion date of around 2038.

Playing with Mother Nature for weather manipulation was nothing compared to Playing With our Entire Universe.

But Hey – It’s Science – So I Guess They Get A Pass to Destroy Our Universe If They Want…

3 thoughts on “CLIMATE CHANGE: Measuring Historical Impacts and Creating BlackHoles with CERN

  1. Most weathermen/womwn have a degree in Communications. BA in some “science”, fugetabboutit. Well over 50% spend several months at my alma mater, aka “Starkvegas”, to be drilled in proper presentation. BTW, no math is required for a Comm degree. So, we’re dealing with memtal midgets.

  2. i agree with you on the collider,when they started running it i noticed a huge amount of assholes gravitating to the east and west coast of the united states,thank God the center of the country wasn’t affected!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.