Germany – Integration of Muslims and Jews

Germany allowed 1 million Muslims to immigrate into their country as the escalation of war has devastated African and Middle Eastern states.   Those numbers added to the internal population of about 3.7 million. By contrast, Germany is home to roughly 120,000 Jews.   And anti-Semitism has, not surprisingly escalated. In 2016, Germany ‘recorded’ 1468 anti-Semitic attacks. In one university poll, 62% of the Jews reported that they face antagonistic anti-Semitic attacks – daily. But the media prefers to target the AfD for rhetoric, despite the fact that they have a paltry membership of just 29,000.  

Merkel’s response is to require school youth to make a trip to the Nazi camps a mandatory curriculum. But most Muslim refugees aren’t integrated into the school system, so how will this solve anything?

Worse, she is proposing building a synagogue in the middle of Berlin’s most prevalent Muslim neighborhood!   Help me here!

Hate Speech.

In the midst of these measures, there are increasing issues with Islamaphobia in Germany that Merkel sees as a direct correlation with the rise of – AfD, all 29,000 members comprising; .6% of the Muslim population in Germany, or .03% of the total population of Germany.

If Muslims wanted to integrate they wouldn’t live in Muslim districts.  

When immigrants come to ‘any’ country, their first line of defense is to group together where they find a commonality, a language, a shared culture.   Cities across the world have created Polish districts, Chinatowns, Irish districts, Muslim districts, German districts, black neighborhoods, etc… It is normal.   Integration is not.   Christians like to befriend other Christians.   Democrats routinely drop Republican friends when they discover their affiliation.   Couples alienate divorcees.

I can attest to some of the above personally.

Syrian orphan children cannot be adopted outside of Muslim families. Integration is not permitted.

There are by far more examples of why it doesn’t work than when it has worked.

Germany now stands at the forefront of hate speech laws.  

The origin of hate speech laws is unfortunately, forgotten. Having its core in Communism, the laws were designed to curb freedom of speech so as to protect the government from any dissent.   But Germany seems to have conveniently forgotten this history lesson and imposed these laws to the extent that US citizens are barred from entry into the country due to their blog content.

But Germany isn’t content with simply barring entry to individuals, they have barred social media content that they deem in “their opinion” is not appropriate.   As such, they have instituted Communist Laws and Agendas similar to “Sharia Law”.

And Germany is not alone.

The UK has a history of barring activists from entering their borders (Pamela Geller, Martin Sellner, and Lauren Southern), although they embrace refugees who commit egregious and violent crimes.   And still, both Germany and the UK refuse to criminalize these refugees telling their polizi to abstain for fear of mediaslamation… errr, defamation…

Hate speech does exist, its called bullying in our education system. All three of my sons were bullied in the public school system. Most school shooters were bullied in their public school system.   But if you take away the gun from the bullied, will he feel better, will he/she feel less bullied? Will they cross the line in another way?

Islam belongs in Islam.   Jewish people hang with Jewish people.   Atheists hang with atheists.   It is just the way it is – for the most part.   There are exceptions, but they are few.   Forcing people upon people is NOT the solution.   It is government control bordering on Communism.   And personally, I ain’t a fan…

Italy Election – The New One Party System?

Angela Merkel has now served as Chancellor of Germany since 2005, having been re-elected September 2017 for an additional four year term.   That would mean she is now serving her ‘fourth’ term!   Despite being elected in September, six months later she has still failed to appoint a new Cabinet.   Her initial debut was based on ideologies that seem to have been reshuffled over the years, specifically in 2010 when her power and influence over the EU began to be noticed and corralled by the Rothschild/Soros cabal.

The CDU Party to which Merkel belongs was initially formed as an amalgamation of Nazi collaborators, liberal elitists, Socialist Marxists and nationalist parties within the state.   It was created after WWII with the oversight of the UK and the US deciding its structure and leaders. The concept was to integrate all views into one driving force of power given each had an equal and viable political appeal.

But Merkel has been at a stalemate to elect a new coalition government given her ratings have tanked and her power has been rebranded.   As a result she has decided to embrace the Social Democrat Party, a party defined as Socialist, Liberal, Progressive and Marxist.  

The shift is quite reflective of where Germany’s future branding is leading. Most notably, utilizing the power and previous notoriety of Merkel to create a new Europe similar to the power evoked during WWI and WWII wherein Germany was central within a Marxist protectorate.

Today as Merkel scrambles to reorganize the EU so to reaffirm her power, Italy is on the verge of becoming a ‘far-right’ state in early elections – that is, according to the MSM. The main causal factor in the Italy shift is the migration stance established by Germany and the EU. In addition, BREXIT has contributed to the exodus of the Liberal Socialists as the EU pressures Italy to increase contributions to the EU budget, and Italy balks.

With the UK representing 13.5% of the EU budget, addressing the lost revenue means anteing from every member state. With the push toward making the Balkans member states, more revenue would be necessary in order to bring them to a net positive before they can create a positive EU cash flow.

Italy’s election results are not over, but the two leaders include Lega Nord and 5-Star, both ‘supposedly’ Nationalist and right leaning.   But because neither party won an outright majority, a coalition must be resolved which could take days or months to create.

Italy has undergone some of the complexities plaguing Spain with a high concentration of wealth associated with one particular area supporting the remaining portions of the country.   And while wine continues to be Italy’s largest world share market, it ranks fifth in the world as a tourist destination. Immigrants and crime could dramatically impact that industry and Italians rather enjoy sustaining what they have. With a vibrant, lush history of art, architecture, and antiquity, Italy is keen on preserving its heritage.

Although the Lega Party represents itself as much more of a Nationalist, anti-immigrant, pro-Trump party, the 5-Star Party is much more of a hybrid espousing radical Socialist views and ideals.   They view politics as a non-entity that should never rule outside of the people. Their views have been compared to aligning with the ‘Californian Ideology’ which closely follows the philosophy of Stewart Brand and Ayn Rand.

While Rand is noted for her various novels rooted in ‘objectivisim’, Brand is the initiator of The Whole Earth Catalog and the Now Long Foundation whose projects included building the 10,000 year clock recently completed by Amazon’s, Bezos, who spent $42 million on the project…

The Lega Party claims to be more nationalist in its Euro views, immigrant views, and it’s Pandania Movement which supports the seccession of Northern Italy. The party has evolved considerably since it’s creation having followed Democrat views, an alliance with Burloscusi who followed closely with Merkel’s liberalism, and much in-fighting. Emerging with Matteo Salvini as it’s leader in 2013, the Party has become progressively more right leaning although it too defines itself as a ‘catch-all’ party.

As such, both of these parties advocated by the media as right-wing, are actually relatively moderate with the aim of embracing a ‘one party coalition’, which sounds dangerously similar to Merkel’s recent change of attitude in embracing the German Socialist Party. These pretexts were used to elect Macron as well as he advocated being a middle of the road candidate when in fact he is rather a nonentity who has done nothing at all.

If these one-party/combined-party ideologies were to spread to the US, it would mean the GOP and Democrats aligned together to form the GOPcrats…. Oh wait, that has already happened in their attacks on Trump!   Imagine that.

Guns and Homicides – World Statistics

Gun ownership around the world is not exactly what has been presented by the media and Facebook memes. For example, I recently was spirited a meme that talked about how Canada and Australia are gunfree, guns are illegal, the US should follow their lead because they don’t have mass shootings… But that simply isn’t the case.

  1. 30.8% of Canadians own a gun
  2. 24.1% of Australians own a gun

While that ratio in the US is 100%, the argument fails because there is no correlation that ‘more guns’ = ‘more shootings’, the correlation is much more complicated.   For example; Mexico’s gun rate is 15% – but their murder rate is 6.34 per 100,000 population or nearly double that of the US.   In Serbia nearly 38% of the population own guns, yet their homicide rate is .61, or 10% of Mexico’s. Iceland has a gun rate over 30% and no homicides by guns.

So what are these countries doing that is right and wrong?   What other factors give rise to the problem? If we truly wanted a ‘solution’ wouldn’t it make sense to analyze their strategies instead of making a false correlation that has an obvious ‘agenda’?

In Iceland the recent introduction of foreign gangs has been the predominant driver of crime. As a result, the police and government routinely follow guidelines which include immediate deportation and the exclusion of visiting support elements such as friends and family members. But Iceland also has a relatively low to non-existent drug use problem, that is until more gangs began moving into town bringing with them prostitution and human trafficking as well. As such, the crime rate schematic has changed to reflect the growing menace of gang warfare.

With over 1.5 million gang members in the US, representing 33,000 different gangs, we have 32,990 more gangs than Iceland.   In March 2017, Mexico had 2020 homicides – all gang/cartel related. Serbia has a history of Mafia gang connections involved in protection rackets, smuggling, drugs, burglaries and arms trafficking. But they don’t have ‘rival’ gangs.

When making statistical comparisons, it is important for the reporting country to be ‘honest’.   In 2011, the German government claimed the murder rate was .8 per 100,000 when in fact the police department claimed it was 2.7.   Germany routinely would seem to ‘manipulate statistics to provide a view that is a false narrative’.   FYI: a recent poll purportedly shows Merkel’s advanced favoritism over Trump – when in fact her ratings are lower than Trump’s ever were in the US – below 30%!

In addition, the gangs in Germany are also predominantly Mafia related including; the Arab Mafia, composed of 7-9 Arab Families, the Albanian Mafia, which controls billions in banks and real estate, the Russian Mafia, which is mostly composed of Aussiedlers, ethnic Germans that were born in the Soviet Union, as well as Turkish organized crime, Middle Eastern Clans and a spattering of motorcycle gangs.

Many of these gangs are fairly new to Germany, specifically the rise of Turkish and Afghanistan populations dominant in Berlin, Hamburg and Bremen. According to Die Welt, Arab Families control most of the organized crime and solve disputes internally. As such the statistics of these Mafia’s are not includable in the government statistical accounting.   Currently, most of these Mafioso gangs have established territories and disputes are not common, however, mass immigration is triggering a shift and bloody battles

According to Transparency International, political parties and businesses are the most corrupt institutions in Germany with 11% of respondents admitting to have been asked to pay bribes.  So is Germany a false narrative of goodness?

Despite these numbers, in 2014 the German police identified only 9155 suspected gang members…   or 1,490,845 less than we have in the US.

So while ‘gun related deaths’ is somehow the topic of choice, statistics reveal that in the US roughly 67% of gun related deaths are suicide, 72% of gun deaths were committed with a handgun, mass shooting in the US tripled during the Obama administration, and 60% of mass shooters identified in the US since 1900 were carried out by people diagnosed with a mental illness or who demonstrated significant mental illness prior to the shooting.

Is it a gun problem? Or is it a gang problem? Or is it a drug problem, a mental problem, a PTSD problem, a corruption problem, who killed Seth Rich problem… What we do know is that suicide tops the list, handguns are the weapon of choice, and a conflaguration of ailments contribute to the Fall.

So. Are we looking to find a solution?   Because it would seem that the overwhelming evidence for homicide growth is always targeting – Gangs. Here, in Europe, in Iceland, in Australia, in Canada. What creates gangs? The desire for money with an absolute vacancy of ethic or morality.   What creates a vacancy of ethic and morality? Values. Who should instill values? Parents. Who is instilling values? The state. The media. Hollywood.  

The EU: A New Ottoman Empire!

In light of BREXIT and Trump’s stance on the less than transparent UN, Juncker is making a bid to find alternate states to bring under the EU umbrella.

Macedonia:   With a population that is roughly 64% Christian and 33% Muslim, Macedonia is a fitting choice to add to the debt of the EU.   It’s unemployment rate is 27-30% and its poverty rate is in excess of 22%.   It’s newly elected Prime Minister, Zoran Zaev of the Social Democrat Union, is mired in more than a bit of controversy as he was charged with conspiracy with ‘a foreign intelligence service’ in initiating a coup against the previous Prime Minister. His squeaky election win was further underscored by the fact that the previous PM was part of the VMRO-DPMNE Party which is considered ‘nationalist’.

Albania:   Roughly 60% of the population is Muslim.   It has the 10th largest reserves of oil, and is the worlds leading exporter of chromium which is used as an anti-corrosive in steel plating. Albania is considered a prime tourist destination for southern Europeans and US citizens. Unemployment is roughly 15%, it operates a trade deficit of -9.7%. It’s PM, Edi Rama, is a member of the Socialist Party.

Bosnia:   Cited as 51% Muslim, the country is loosely defined as a liberal democracy. Despite this tag, “…the highest political authority in the country is the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the chief executive officer for the international civilian presence in the country and is selected by the European Union. Since 1995, the High Representative has been able to bypass the elected parliamentary assembly, and since 1997 has been able to remove elected officials. The methods selected by the High Representative have been criticized as undemocratic.   International supervision is to end when the country is deemed politically and democratically stable and self-sustaining.

In essence, the country is ruled by the EU.

It’s infrastructure and economy have yet to recover from the Bosnian/Croatian war that ended in 1995. Main industries include steel, coal and iron ore.   Its unemployment rate is near 40%, and it requires IMF loans simply to survive.

Kosovo: Approximately 96% Muslim, Kosovo’s status as a nation is subject to controversy. Like Bosnia, it has yet to sustain itself since the Yugoslavia war that ended in 1995.   Rich in agriculture, the country boasts 53% of its land use for the production of agri-products, and 41% a forestry. The current PM, Ramush Haradinaj, served in the Kosovo war and although he was indicted for war crimes, no charges were implemented.

Montenegro: The newly elected Prime Minister, Dusko Marcovic, is a member of the Democratic Socialists, not unlike Macedonia’s political metamorphosis. A tiny nation that was also created as a result of the Yugoslav war, its main industry is tourism. While in need of major investment within infrastructure to increase the revenue basis of this industry, Montenegro is a recipient of Climate Change funds with the approval of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The Baltic State Region, recognized as developing countries who are at the greatest risk of global warming, have been targeted for Climate Change funding according to the Paris Accord in order to mitigate these potentially catastrophic events…

In essence, all of this means that we have a bunch of Baltic countries whose nominal GDP per capita ranges from a low $3200 to about $6200, whose economies are in desperate need of a boost in monetary investment, preferably free, whose ethnicities are either largely or predominantly Muslim, who belong to the Socialist/Communist leaning political spectrum, and whose land bears fertile usage, wherein a solution was concocted in which a fake moral and ethical agenda of climate change was created, funded with private and global government donated money via the Paris Climate Accord and the UN, that would then be diverted to these economies for rebuilding and infrastructure spending so as to reinvent viable economies to be integrated into the EU, with the ultimate goal of recreating a New Ottomon Empire, which coincidentally was the stated goal of ISIS and Al-Nusra. In the meantime, the citizens of the EU extend welcoming arms unaware that their own ethnicities will soon become the minority and their lives uprooted and displaced. All under the guise of Merkel and Juncker who seemingly are aglaze in a false belief of arrogant power, indoctrinated into trusting that they will be tasked with a leading power role over this New Ottoman Empire, while childishly unaware that they are mere puppets who are ultimately quite expendable…


Valentines Day: Christian or Pagan?

Pagan festivals?   There are Christians who attribute holidays to pagan rituals and denounce them as evil. But holidays, like people, can have historical significance based on however you view them. What is your perception?   Often in marriage a person’s ‘perception’ becomes so atrophied that they no longer see the good or positive, such is the understanding of various holidays – such as Valentines Day.

There are some Christians who denounce Valentines Day as a pagan ritual rooted in lascivious and evil ideals and actions. But there is another Valentines Day in which it is the embracing of love, faith and Christian martyrdom.   They both occur in February:

Lupercalia is the pagan version which purportedly was rooted in Roman mythology. It is ‘believed’ that its name was derived from lupus meaning wolf, and thus an entire story was created in which fertility rites, sacrificial rites and conception rites were observed.   Much of the perceptions of Lupercalia are vague and hypothesized. There is some thought that Lupercalia was brought to Italy before the Trojan War in 1194 BC. But there is really no absolute proof, simply conjecture.  

Februus was an ancient god in Roman mythology whose name signified ‘purification’ which included such springtime rituals as washing.   This would be aligned with modern day thought regarding ‘spring cleaning’.   Not exactly a pagan endeavor so much as a day to – clean…

The pagan concept of Lupercalia is based on ‘legend’. A Legend by definition is a story that has no authentication.   It is a fabrication.   And because this Legend occurs ‘supposedly’ on February 15th, Valentines Day is hijacked and within Christian fear of paganism, Valentines Day looses its other roots – love.

Saint Valentine of Rome, born in 226 AD, died on February 14th, 269 while imprisoned, tortured and martyred in the name of Christianity.   Some vitae ascribed to him state that he was beheaded while trying to proselytize then Emperor, Claudius Gothicus.   Other vitae, much later describe him as a Priest who secretly married couples so that the husbands would not have to go to war.   It is thought that while in prison he healed the jailer’s daughter of blindness and left her a note signed, “Your Valentine”.

While these too are legends adopted by the Roman Catholic Church and as a legend not authenticated, the concept is rooted in faith, Christian martyrdom, marriage and love.

Is it wrong to celebrate a Christian legend rooted in love, charity and faith?

Halloween has similar denunciation in Christian circles despite evidence that it is rooted in the Western Christian celebration of All Saints Eve, a dedication of remembrance of martyrs, saints and the faithful who have died.   Dating to the 4th century AD Halloween means “Holy Evening” and can be traced to Pope Gregory III’s founding of an oratory in St. Peters.  While the church changed the original All Saints Day celebration from April to three days ending November 1, the posture remains the same.

Although historical belief linked Halloween to pagan rituals, it is more likely to be the evolution of a Celtic festival “Samhain”.   Samhain was a ritual that recognized the end of the harvest season, the onset of winter which represented death, and the feasts and games enjoyed during this time of transition.   Bonfires were lit to keep the devil away.

Sometime around 1745, All Saints Day, and Samhain merged to form and preform the rituals that are now observed within Halloween.   It was the Christian church that ultimately hijacked Samhain in an attempt to quash the pagan rite and transform it into a Christian celebration of All Saints.  Still, Samhain’s roots were about the end of a harvest and the celebration of bountiful fruits.  There was no evil – unless you choose to root it in evil…

We have a choice. We can choose to perceive these days as having historically positive and loving reference, or we can choose to see them as belonging to ‘evil’.   And thus, in our minds it becomes what we perceive.


Respect: A Virtue Lost to Arrogance and Daycare…

When my children were young, ‘nip it in the bud’ was a common phrase in my house. Every generation deals with a lot of the same difficulties, but I noticed that the coming generation, that of my children, were in fact different.   Two reasons come to mind.   1)   they were the first fulltime daycare generation, and 2) parents overwhelmingly allowed bad behaviors to go without consequence.  

Having owned a daycare, I saw firsthand the abuse.   Not by the workers, but by the parents.   Daycare was used as a Socialist tool to raise children because many parents didn’t want to.  Often leaving their children for 12 hours a day, parent’s asked if we would open overnight care so they could – party…   Certainly in its infancy daycare had a valuable place as more and more single parents, mostly moms, needed to make a living to support their child(ren).

Soon, daycare became the middle class nanny.   And with the advent of classier titles, Montessori, and a media firestorm that saw all children as lost souls unless they were attending Preschool, Pre-K, K and 10 different studies and athletic endeavors in-between, daycare became the norm.   In fact, if your child wasn’t in daycare something was terribly wrong with you.   Mine did not attend.  And so the wealthy stepped in to create an even larger largess of ‘schools’ where rates matched those charged by the uber colleges and universities.

While generations of demise can be tracked back to Socrates and his lamenting of the lost generation, the value of ‘respect’ would seem to be at the core of the millennials’ lost souls.

Children grew up without discipline, without a mother/father guide, without the core and stability a true home atmosphere provides. Instead, they grew up in institutions always surrounded by 10 to 25 other children vying for attention.   They grew up screaming at their parents, back-talking, and defiant. They became entitlement seekers whose role models included most of the Hollywood cabal. And without a value structure learned at home, they adopted the one they saw the most – the Hollywood Fantasy.

It is interesting because the blog of Austrialia’s missiologist, Mike Frost, routinely denigrates America and all Americans, most specifically evangelical Christians as though we are the root of all that is bad.  However, it is in my church that I see the least of the millennial disease – disrespect.  The youth rooted in God are also rooted in virtues and values devoid in the secular world.  And sadly, I read it in the soapbox grandstanding of Facebook youth who tell everyone what they need to do while living off the earnings of their parents…

We see it in the screaming secular world of Hollywood, arrogantly decrying in media conversations, and rampantly entitled in feminist propaganda that loves to use history as their platform for maligning and belittling all the peoples of today because they don’t have a heart – like they do – damn it!  Whew!

They don’t know how to listen because no one taught them the art. And like each generation before they think they are heads smarter than their elders.   Only, each generation before evolved and came to understand the value and wisdom of their elders, this one – not so much.

There is a difference, a sharp contrast.

While some scholars shrug it off as a ‘stage of life’, in so doing they fail to acknowledge that this ‘stage’ is manifested in a particular group and would seem to not exist quite so much in another group, the group that did not grow up in daycare.   In addition, this “stage” would seem to have become one that has no evolution.  Stagnant.  Daycare as it is used today has never existed. There have been nanny’s and household nursemaids, but those were mostly reserved for the wealthy and elite. It is different.  Because their upbringing was different.  Socialist countries attempt to mandate daycare institutions – Germany, Australia, etc…

When a child is raised by parents, they adopt the values and virtues of their parents, when they are raised by a daycare, they adopt the values and virtues of those teachers in the daycare, and then the teachers in school. Parent’s wonder how they lost their children…

Just like in filing your taxes with the IRS, ignorance is not a defense.   I watched my boy’s friends scream at their parents, and even slap them on occasion. Boundaries were nonexistent then – and now. Their only lifeline? Arrogance.   Without the humble self-esteem that a parent embodies and teaches, a child creates their own in arrogance, pride and self obsessive attitudes.

Contrary to the pedestal that Mr. Mike Frost preaches from in which America and Americans are the fault and blame for everything universal, this phenomena of disrespect is prevalent the world wide.   And would ironically seem to include Mr. Frost… Inviting discourse, but then demeaning anyone who disagrees with the content, is not an open discourse, it is a demeaning one built on Arrogance.  His blog demonstrates this.

And while Frost seems bent on dissing America, he would be better advised to take note of Australia’s growing apostasy; 1901 – 92% of population identified as Christian, 2016 – 52% of population identified as Christian with only 25% of those attending church weekly.   And as of 2007, it would appear that only half of the Australian government believed in the Bible as only half agreed to use it in their swearing in ceremony.

The virtue of respect is most commonly lost in the sin of Arrogance, and while we are all guilty, some practice humility and repentance while others practice pride.

Immigration Entitlement

Norway’s largest immigrant population demographics; Poland and Sweden.   Australia’s largest immigrant population;   England, New Zealand and mainland China.   Canada’s largest immigrant population; UK, China. Number of Syrians in Canada – 18,000 representing .1% of the population.   Switzerland largest immigrant population; Germany, Italy and Portugal.   Ireland immigrants: Poland and UK.   Japan? Foreign residents represent 1.22% of the entire population and are primarily from China and Korea. Portugal’s immigrants; Brazil and Cape Verde.

So why isn’t the media all in a tizzy over the demographics in other countries?

Recently, a number of refugees were relocated to an island in Scotland. They complained bitterly because they said the island wasn’t metropolitan enough and had an aging population with an average age of 55-59…

Of the 436,000 legal refugees brought into the US from 2011 through 2016, California took 36,000 representing .09% of the refugee population, roughly 2000 came from Syria.   Total Syrian “refugees” are estimated to number 6.3 million.   So California has given home to .03% of the Syrian refugees.   In other words, the numbers are so relatively small it’s like paying $20 on your $63,000 debt, it would take 3150 years to pay it off without interest…

In Australia immigrants must be ‘skilled workers’, must pass a comprehensive test, must have an employer lined up ready to employ you, and must remain squeaky clean for two years before you can even apply for residency. After 4 years of lawful residency, you will be considered for permanent residency which may take another year.

Canada:     According to the government, “For example: a 25 year-old female with excellent English ability, basic French knowledge, a Master’s degree with 2 years work experience in the country of origin, no prearranged employment in Canada and a spouse that has studied, lived and worked in Canada might score upwards of 80 points overall. This combined score of the six factors would make her eligible to apply for permanent residency.”

 The immigrant policies of nations around the world are strictly defined.   They have been defined in the US since 1790, revised and updated. Still, the illegal immigrants in the US are estimated to number about 12 million representing 3% of the total population.   Total immigrants in US amount to about 44 million or just over 13% of the population with most living in Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois and New Jersey.  Still – not good enough…

Gaining legal status is a difficult and costly process, however, abiding by the laws is required of every citizen. When laws no longer have effect, society collapses. Those immigrants who followed the rules through hard work and tenacity can feel bitter when a magic wand is waved and millions are simply granted a waiver.  But that is what the Liberals and Socialists are arguing.

Within this societal chaos, the rules of Order melt away and the entitlement schematic rises to the surface. I remember as my kids grew they would continually ask if something was ‘free’.   Amazement reined as they found that our house wasn’t free, my car, and ultimately even the water.   A generation has risen that was apparently not given this guidance and so they believe that everything entitled should be free…  Of course, it follows that everyone who has worked to gain wealth should then pick up the tab for all the freebies that youth can’t afford because they haven’t worked.   Somehow the switches that govern logic and rational seem to be turned – off.   Big Daddy is thus the godhead!  “You have the money, you pay, I don’t have the money so I won’t pay…”  What happened to the widow who gave her only penny?

Until this socialist generation is willing to foot the bill ‘themselves’ for the massive immigrant policies they support, they will never learn that entitlement means someone still has to pay and ultimately it will be ‘them’, should be – them.

The Green Climate Fund – A Soros Child

A funny thing happened on the way to the Forum, everyone cheered, but no one Changed… Germany has declared that it will not meet it’s Climate Change goals for 2020, China says it’s emissions will continue to rise through 2030, and France is mum, as in maybe no one in Paris will notice they have actually done – nothing. Six countries in the EU boast that they have met their goals as stipulated by the EU Commission; Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal and Romania. YEAH! Except they already complied as of 2014, because their goals were minimal and the economic crisis required ‘belt tightening’, so technically in order to meet goals they had to do – nothing.

So, despite the humbra of toxic words, toxic air hovers large and in charge.

Apparently, The Green Climate Fund is the body tasked with collecting and disbursing pledged funds from countries across the globe.   A quick overview: Japan has disbursed roughly 50% of pledges, Germany a third, The Netherlands a third, France roughly half, China -0-, UK about 2/3, and US 1/3, India -0-, and South America -0.

Of the $10 billion collected by The Green Climate Fund, roughly $45 million was spent on Administrative Expenses in 2017, and $35 million in 2016. Apparently, these hard working Board Members work on average – 10 days per month.   According to the 990 Tax Return dated 2014, it would appear that they raised about $88 million paid some salaries and operating costs and banked the balance. In 2017 they needed to create a investment fund management IT system to handle all the cash… Poor Babies.

Their latest project includes solving the Ethiopian drought problem thru an investment of $45 million to be developed over a five year period.   So far, they haven’t actually ‘done’ anything except draft a proposal – funding = $0.   They have pledged $38.5 million toward Columbia in order to improve the ecosystem.   This too is a proposal for which no actual work has been done and no money disbursed.   They have pledged $57 million to Argentina in the form of a “Loan”, $0 actually disbursed. There is an outstanding pledge grant of $31.4 million to Egypt for infrastructure rebuilding, nothing disbursed. A grant of $26.9 million to Nauru, the world’s smallest island, for the purpose of developing a climate resistant port. No dollars disbursed.

In fact, it would appear that the funds are primarily targeting ‘infrastructure and water shortages’. Both of these issues are certainly important, they just aren’t about changing the global warming trend that the fund stipulates to be their purpose.  So why are they funding these projects?

Who are the recipients? Namibia, Morocco, Senegal, Maldives, Ecuador, Mali, Gambia, Tualu, Armenia, Vietnam, El Salvador, Fiji, Peru, etc…

A Few Examples:

Malawi: USAID has been working with the government of Malawi for years to help mitigate agricultural shifts and provide drought security. USAID budget request for 2018 was $15.4 billion. So why is the Green Fund duplicating USAID?

Maldives: They have been battling a losing battle as the sea’s rise and the islands are swamped. Their 2008 government plant to abandon ship and relocate was dismissed and a $10 billion contract with the Saudi’s was initiated whereby they would secure their shipping route safety and develop the islands for tourism relocating thousands of local people. So is The Green Fund actually collaborating with the Saudi’s?

Ecuador:   Ecuador has been raising it’s fist to resolve water issues for years. The government has made some radical changes, particularly in energy investment and diversity. Partnering with the European Commission thru EUROCLIMA, they have spent $4.2 billion on energy projects.   They are currently funded by the REDD+ Program within the UN. So why is The Green Fund duplicating funding projects?

It would appear, that The Green Fund is simply a duplicate board tasked with billions of dollars in funding whose purpose may very well be to create a slush fund to give the appearance of battling Climate Change, aka, Global Warming, when in fact it is sustaining the infrastructure, agriculture and energy growth of third world countries. To what ultimate goal?  

Given it’s purported goal is to raise $100 billion per year, it should be noted that it’s Board of Directors is predominantly comprised of Arabs, Africans, and various representatives from the Netherlands, many of whom seem to be devoid of a background, with the exception of the Globalist, Leonardo Martinez-Diaz. He has written extensively on globalizing emerging and developing countries in order to create a Global Order. He is a Global Director at Sustainable Finance Center at the World Resources Institute.

World Resources Institute partners with the George Soros – Open Society Foundations.

And there you have it: The Green Climate Fund, which is demanding contributions in the range of $100 billion annually, is utilizing those funds to create a global network of developing countries so as to ultimately incorporate their governments into a unified One World Order. Climate Change/Global Warming are simply tag phrases to sucker the funds for – The Greater Good of the Order of George Soros.

Leader vs Boss: Chaos vs Order

A number of years ago my now ex-husband came home all proud from his weekend getaway and produced for me a two page single spaced typed list of rules, or regulations, that he wanted to impose on me, our marriage and my children with me.   I got about a fourth of the way through, tossed it in the air – and laughed. What else could I do?

Society has devolved into a chaotic vision of what constitutes a ‘Boss”. Today, a boss is often someone who relegates and utilizes power to manipulate, humiliate and use until the cup is empty.   The nuance isn’t about a relationship with the person/employee, it is about absorbing everything they have and tossing them aside as there is a new inventory being manufactured to replace the old.   But what happens when the ‘newly manufactured’ employee has been trained within a ‘deregulated’ university and is then deposited into a ‘regulated world’?

By contrast, a Leader is someone who guides, sometimes with stern ethics and morality, and sometimes with a gentle touch. But the guide is always directing his flock forward, ever teaching, ever loving. The Leader desires his flock to remain with him their entire life out of Loyalty, Love and Trust. He wants to see his flock grow. The idea that one might stray is deeply sorrowful.

So what happens when the youth that will be working in our regulated corporations, our hospitals, our pharmacies, and our government have been raised to covet self, to be weak, and to be deregulated in all that they do?

They will all fall down.

The collapse of leadership is a systemic problem that has infiltrated our homes and schools, and will in a very short time seep into the fabric of our corporate world with such ferocity that it may not be able to recover. It is not simply a US anomaly, the leadership of France, Germany, the EU, Sweden, Norway, etc… have all succumbed to the false supposition that a deregulated society can be sustained within a regulated world.

Hollywood is just a small fractured example.   But they had the money to hire regulated professionals to buy their way out of their deregulated ethics.   A generation of young people are about to embark on a new journey and be integrated into a business world that is ruled by Bosses, not Leaders.

On a much smaller scale we have seen some of the ramifications in business as some don’t survive the mass exodus that can occur when a Boss does not understand the nuance of Leadership. Stories reveal that once hugely profitable companies wither and fold, unable to survive the oppressiveness of Boss.

My generation was a generation of ‘scramblers’, when things got tough we knew how to scramble. Scramblers are most often the core of Entrepreneurship. They are the drivers of innovation and sustainability. So what happens when this current generation is the one holding up the pillars? Certainly there are exceptions to the rule, but they are the few among the many, and in a world defined by numbers, their strength will be tested to it’s infinite power.

My son was recently the victim of a “Boss”, a woman who didn’t see the value of drive, loyalty, education, and hard work and instead saw greed, self, and jealousy. He is but one example among hundreds of thousands, and as the generation of ‘safe spaces’ exits their deregulated universities and attempt to embark on a career, they will find themselves to be replaceable commodities in a world where Leadership is a foreign concept and control is paramount. There are no ‘safe spaces’ in the real world.

My ex-husband certainly didn’t understand the concept and continues his spiraling self destruction. The stories abound, from husbands to fathers to managers to bosses to government.

Trump is exercising the command of Leadership within a hostile Swamp of government officials who have usurped their position and become ensconced in a drive of power and control.   He is in a Battle that would have taken down anyone else with the second blow. If we do anything less than support him, take a pillar, then we are responsible for what could be the New Age Fall.

NYC Gym: In The Nude Classes

WAIT A MINUTE! In the wake of sexual assaults, sexual harassment, and inappropriate sexual advances, a gym in New York City thinks it is an appropriate time to move into coed naked fitness classes! Really?

Does that mean that if your classmate merely gives you a lascivious look it is time to scream sexual harassment, or do you wear blinders? Does it mean that if you get accidentally bumped the gym will be sued and the bumper put in jail?   I cannot believe the absurdity. I wonder what company is insuring the gym?

It is hard enough to visualize sexual harassment being an issue in Hollywood wherein women routinely will provide sex for a role, or where the body flaunt at every event is about who can titillate more than the other… by wearing as little as possible while still wearing ‘something’.  Adultery is the norm, yawn, and orgies the party scene.

Of course, this does not even begin to address the magazines and fashion catalogs that attempt to utilize every imaginable means of showing flesh without being labeled X rated.   All this while I stare at my PG-13 computer monitor that has a naked woman – albeit from the rear on Fox News.

We may be having a sexual predator revolution, but it seems a bit odd to have a revolution against predators while simultaneously ratcheting up nakedness, immorality and sexier than thou clothing and pictures all over the MSM News networks!   Does anyone else see the absurdity?

The other comical aspect of the story which was presented as simply a factual account of normalcy is the fact that this gym is frequented by Hollywood personalities, including; Rihanna, Sandra Bullock and Tyra Banks… I wonder if Harvey Weinstein is a member?   Or Kevin Spacey?  

The gym does provide an out for those who are more modest… for those too embarrassed to do their yoga routine completely naked, the gym does allow members to wear nude underwear, all the while promoting the decision as “cheeky fun”!   How quippy quaint  of them…

Who in their right mind would teach such a class and feel safe from an accusation of sexual assault?   Does the teacher ‘adjust your pose’? Give you pointers? What happens if a man becomes aroused, is that sexual harassment? I imagine everyone is required to sign a very lengthy, very cheeky, waiver claiming that they will take full responsibility for every overt act that might be construed as sexual harassment and identify it as ordinary conduct.

Hypocrisy Hollywood could not possibly get more bizarre.   Remember Jennifer Lawrence in tears because she had to undress … er, and the humiliation… er, only to discover she proudly did a Playboy layout after?

For those who know yoga the poses include; downward dog, numerous poses that purport to strengthen the ‘groin’, uttanasana , cobbler pose… help me here! Some of these are embarrassing enough ‘with’ clothes on!

All of this is advertised as ‘forward thinking’, which is Hollywood break-yoga for “hey, sex predators come on in the party is on”!