Sexual Abuse of Children

Sexual abuse of children is rampant.   It isn’t confined to Priests and Dioceses. The very charities that are called to protect children are in fact repeatedly found to perpetrate sexual abuse and prostitution. The organizations that are called to oversee these NGO’s are also complicit.  

In Canada, Bill 89 was recently passed that was endorsed and lobbied for by the charity, Save The Children. The Bill was quite controversial as it added a provision in which Social Services may legally take possession of children from their parents if the parent is deemed to not embrace ‘gender identity’.   This could constitute child abuse.

In one account, a Canadian couple were banned from fostering, their foster children taken away, because they refused to tell the children the Easter Bunny was real.

The rules within Social Services are ambiguous. Case workers have been criticized as too aggressive and too lenient. But “Child Protection Services” has taken on morality as a tool to claim abuse.

Many charities and NGO’s have been infiltrated and mobilized to effectively take control of our children and submit them to the ‘state’.   In Cuba, a couple received a 2 year jail sentence and fine for homeschooling their children. In Germany the same law exists and is radically enforced. The reasoning?   The state wants full control of child indoctrination. That’s called ‘communism’.

Save The Children has been mired in various scandals including sexual abuse and internal harassment. It’s International Chairman resigned last year claiming the allegations are so prevalent, he could no longer have his name attached.   Oxfam has been implicated in Haiti prostitution.   British Red Cross has admitted to a number of harassment cases.   Restless Development is facing internal charges of rape. The United Nations ‘peacekeepers’ have allegations dating back decades, most – conveniently dismissed. And yet, Charity Navigator does not take these situations into account when rating a charity – instead it is all financially evaluated.

In California, if the state determines that a child is uncontrollable, the state courts have ruled that the child becomes the property of the state.

CPS can immediately take children from their families without a court order if:

  • There is a present and immediate threat of physical or sexual abuse.
  • Leaving the children in the home is not safe or best for the children’s welfare.
  • CPS made reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removing the children from the home.

The obvious open ended statement being “leaving the children in the home is not safe or best for he children’s welfare”.   What does that mean?

The US currently has roughly 400,000 to 450,000 children in foster care. In Germany the number is roughly 120,000. California ranks first with number of children in foster care – 60,000, Texas is second with about 30,000 and Florida is third with 23,000.   Substance abuse has been identified as the most common factor in the continued rise of US children in foster care.

But a ranking of drugs as the biggest problem by state put Florida at 30, Texas at 37 and California at 41. When it came to drug addiction ranking – DC held the title for number 1.

So the equation of drug use to foster care would not seem to be the most prevalent cause.

There are in fact huge discrepancies in these states with regard to ethnicity. In California, 53% of foster care children are Hispanic and 20% are black.   In Texas, 44% are Hispanic and 21% are black. And in Florida 31% are black and 16% are Hispanic. According to Child Trends, the number one cause for entry into Foster Care in California is “neglect” at 75%, whereas substance abuse accounts for only 10%.

According to California Law, the following are defined as ‘neglect’:

  • Clothes are ill-fitting, filthy, or inappropriate for the weather.
  • Hygiene is consistently bad (unbathed, matted and unwashed hair, noticeable body odor).
  • Untreated illnesses and physical injuries.
  • Is frequently unsupervised or left alone or allowed to play in unsafe situations and environments.
  • Is frequently late or missing from school.

There is so much legal ambiguity and corruption within the system that too often the stories of Child Protection acting more like Nazi Protection is perpetrated resulting in over the top cases wherein parents are illegally jailed, children are taken without proper cause, and just irrational judgment.

In one story a toddler fell out of his crib, was taken from his parents even though the CPS investigator reported he was healthy and happy at home.

The problem is not a US problem, it is a universal problem:   In Norway, a three-week-old child was taken away from his mother in 2008 based on doubts about her ‘parenting abilities.’ The child was placed in foster care and the mother was allowed only twelve hours of contact per year with her son. Ultimately, all visitation rights were denied, the mother’s parental rights were removed, and the child was put up for adoption.”

Funny thing is – we don’t see the outrage or the advocacy or the compassion extended to these injustices by our liberal, Democrat and Hollywooders. Although they are spiked about juveniles in detention at the border…  Odd.

Pedophilia – A Catholic Church’s History

A continuous gnaw has wreaked havoc on my gut of late. It stems from the latest conviction of a Catholic Cardinal for pedophilia. When asked in closing what he would say in his defense, the Cardinal sent chills through the airwaves as he claimed that what he did was ‘vanilla sex’ and shouldn’t be condemned so harshly. The obvious rationale being that he knew of, and/or witnessed, far worse by his peers and thus his ‘vanilla’ wasn’t worth the persecution. The extent of that statement is the core of conspiracy theories because it is represented by a truth or truism that can easily spike perverse imagination of what might be entailed in the non-vanilla world of Priestly tradition.
How can a man of the cloth, a man who is a devout follower of God, logically justify pedophilia?

So I decided to research ancient history within this context:

Like Homosexual, the term Pedophilia was not coined until modern times. The term paedophilia was created in 1886 by Viennese psychiatrist, Richard von Krafft Ebing. The original term used in ancient Greece and Rome was pederasty.   Dating from sometime in the 9th century BC, it is thought that the practice was a cultural norm. It is believed that Saint Augustine, Muhammad, Socrates, Lord Byron, and Ghandi all participated in this form of relationship which was socially acceptable in the time.

While pederasty may have been the origin, it was very different from what has evolved into pedophilia. In ancient periods, all forms of sexuality were acceptable in that they were not considered criminal or deviant. The Old Testament references having multiple wives in order to “proliferate”.  Sexual relations with young boys was common, especially among the elite. The Roman era references the monarchial rule of Kings and Priests who were provided slaves with whom they could freely have relations. In the 3rd century, Mesopotamia, ritualistic homosexuality was an integral part of temple life.
The term homosexual was also created by Richard von Krafft Ebing in 1886. While in Latin ‘homo’ simply means man, as in homo sapiens, in Greek it can mean ‘same’. It should be noted that Ebing believed that sexual relations should be for one purpose only, procreation, and that all other forms of sexual relations were perverse, deviant.

Unfortunately, Ebing felt that ‘any’ relations that could produce a child were perhaps reproachable, but not deviant. Thus rape was not considered perverse.

It is likely that within the confines of the Catholic Church, the change in societal morays were never adopted, and thus it never qualified as deviant in this contingent. But then the Church has operated outside of the law since it’s inception as it still adheres to the belief and philosophy of serfdom.

Some pundits argue that pedophilia in the church is a minor fault within the scheme of statistics. Only a very small percentage of Catholic Priests and Bishops have been convicted. But that logic is rife with hypocrisy. Conviction rate is not a viable statistical assertion. A parallel assertion would be that the vast majority of thieves and murderers are prosecuted and in jail. The absurdity of that is obvious, and it applies to pedophiles, priests, and sexual assailants. The vast majority are never prosecuted.

Others argue that the Church’s Priests and Bishops entered into this pedophilia state of mind due to the clause of celibacy. But celibacy was not always a rule. The first Pope, Paul, was married. Many subsequent Popes were also married and had children. The Council of Elvira convened in 304 AD requiring abstinence even if the clergy was married. In 325, this ban was overturned by Constantine. Celibacy in the Catholic Church has only e less than a thousand years.

“In the early 11th century Pope Benedict VIII responded to the decline in priestly morality by issuing a rule prohibiting the children of priests from inheriting property.” In 1139 AD celibacy was made the rule of law within the Church.

But homosexuality and pederasty were not prohibited. While they both were well entrenched prior to the law of celibacy, the rule then became that the clergy were prohibited from procreating – not sexual relations.

Therefore, homosexuality and pedophilia can NOT be attributed to celibacy because they both existed well before and were considered an elite rite of passage.
Some historians claim that the law of celibacy was created to ‘lift’ the church into a higher status than even the nobles by claiming sex with women was sinful and beneath them.

In the Bible’s New Testament, Paul was writing letters to the Corinthians and Galatians between 53 AD and 55 AD, in which he was responding to a flagrant lack of ethics or morality within the culture. Prostitution was largess, bestiality existed, and orgies were commonplace. People were no longer ‘procreating’.

This was not nouveau, this was the lifestyle that had existed for hundreds of years prior, dating to the 9th century BC. It is also relevant to note that Paul wrote numerous letters to the Corinthians and Galatians, although only a limited few have been preserved and acknowledge by the Church.

While this research in no way supports pedophilia in the church, it does reveal that in their world, it is a code of ancient history that is righteous. It explains the statement “vanilla sex”. And it explains how and why the Church believes laws are a means of control for the elite, while they hold to the epithet that they are, above the law. They meaning – All those who define themselves as – elite.

While I in no way purport to hold myself out as a theologian to any extent, I was curious to try and understand and research how the highest members of the Church could justify their behavior.

IN particular:  What thought process could possibly justify the rape of a child as “vanilla sex”?

Socialism In The US House…takes hold

With the Democrat House filing into DC they bring with them a new host of Socialists.  And one might gasp except that in 2010 the Socialist Party released a list of 70 Congressional Democrats who were also members of the Socialist Party of America.   They endorsed none other than John Kerry and Obama.  In the latest election 15 Socialists were elected to office across the US.  While the numbers may seem small from a percentage standpoint, they do reveal an evolution.   The EU Commission is comprised of Socialists, the UN is run by Social Democrats, and still, despite the collapse of Venezuela, the push continues.

In every Socialist state, the first death is that of the Middle Class.   Those who have much, have more, and those who had nothing, have something.   The fact that those who had nothing was a high percentage is what keeps the power operating.  Until it collapses.

And so the question arises, why does it collapse?

Opinion pieces are rampant in this discussion, most recently Bloomberg’s op-ed attempted to sway the discussion of Venezuela, and instead highlight the vast progress and effectiveness of Bolivia’s Socialist President, Morales.    The opinion piece claims there is a right way and a wrong way to do Socialism and lists Venezuela as the wrong way compared to Bolivia as the right way.  Noah Smith, the author of the piece bills himself as a neoliberal on his Twitter status.

But is Bolivia really a ‘right’ way, or is the author simply attempting to validate Socialism?

Bolivia’s President Morales continues to win re-election, not because his policies are good for Bolivia, but because he has given something to a population that had nothing, and virtually eliminated the Middle Class in the process.  He is elected by the poor, the 40% of the population living below poverty line.   Despite being given vast free assistance from Cuba and Brazil, Bolivia continues to rank in the bottom bowels of South America’s economy, ranked just above Venezuela.  Somehow Noah Smith didn’t read that far.

Bloomberg’s, Smith, cites the fact that they have GDP growth… and makes the claim that illiteracy has been eradicated.  Unemployment is made up of unskilled laborers, and skilled workers are in high shortage.  Corruption is rampant, a dictatorial rule is leveraged, while only 40% of the youth population continue school after the 4thgrade, and 20% enter secondary school, UNESCO has declared the country to be wholly literate.   In case you are math challenged, UNESCO warns that the rate can not be higher than 100%…   Unlike Florida which typically allows upwards of 140% of the population to vote.   I digress.

In terms of World Ranking – Bolivia is followed by Zimbabwe.

Not exactly a stellar record to use in support of Socialism.

The splintering and demise of the Republican and Democrat Parties is parlayed.

While Noah Smith argues that Socialism didn’t destroy Venezuela, hyperinflation did, he rather bizarrely refuses to acknowledge what caused ‘hyperinflation’.   It is humorous to note that Venezuela is referred to as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela – it followed the exact same ideologies and principles as Morales does now in Bolivia.  The Bolivarian Revolution in 1999 ushered in Chavez as the savior of the Republic.  He vied for ‘socialism or death’.   Chavez government was called the Bolivarian government.  He created a new Constitution – as did Morales.  They support social welfare, social property, communes, universal healthcare, and of course, redistribution of wealth.

The only difference between Bolivia and Venezuela is that Chavez introduced Socialist policies beginning in 1999, Morales took office in 2006, Bolivia simply hasn’t reached the same crescendo – yet.

While the Soviet Union took decades to rise from the ashes of it’s socialist/communist rule instituted by the Bolsheviks, Venezuela and Bolivia don’t have the machismo or brute intellect to know how to recreate failing economics despite being rich in natural resources.  Reading of the demise of Venezuela, it reads as a static version of Bolivia’s current crisis and stagnation – crime rates soaring, riots, protests, inability to redirect industry from oil, vast resources left untapped, education crisis, etc…

Despite Noah Smith attempting to frame Socialism as simply mishandled, he has shown that his own understanding is rather pathetic.    But what he isn’t noticing is the fact that while both ruling parties in the US are crumbling, fracturing, and called out as failures (thank you Romney), the evolution of Socialism historically appears as a saving solution only to completely destroy the country so relegated – from within.

The EU is only now waking up to their own demise promulgated by the Socialist/Communist regimes of Merkel, Macron, and May.  Sweden is Falling faster than the Twin Towers, and Norway is a close second.   But then, that is the plan…

We The People, have that authority.  It is a choice.

Was Jesus an Immigrant? Genghis Khan and Hitler were.

Migration has taken a giant leap as it is now become a ‘Jesus was an immigrant’ verse.  Effectively, nearly everyone is some sort of immigrant, but as usual, that statement is meaningless for the world is very different today, laws are different, society is different, and wisdom needs to replace empty statements.  Every country has in place immigration laws.   The purpose of immigration laws is to maintain boundaries of right and wrong, just like every other law we are required to obey.   Changing the law, not breaking it, is the core.  There are infinite inhumane observances in every country, and as such people fall through the cracks. 

But apparently, immigration isn’t really about humanity or human rights, according to a UN document re- released dating from in 2000.  According to the UN, the crisis was about Europe’s falling workforce, in particular male workforce.  The crisis was about funding future pensions.   It was about local populations falling behind.

The male population within the refugees and immigrants descending on Europe represent over 84%.   They leave their women behind, their wives, their daughters.  This has a twofold consequence; the country left behind – has no male workforce, the country going to – has a disproportionate male dominance.

In Syria, the women are begging for the men to return home.  Merkel says no.  Merkel says they belong to Germany now.

In Sweden, 90% of unaccompanied minors were male.   The very liberal, Justin Trudeau, in 2016 announced that only females, accompanied children, and families would have access to Canada’s immigration.

Historically, when the ratios of male/female become skewed, crime rates rise, rape rises, and prostitution rises.   Because most of the immigrants coming to Europe are of a lower socioeconomic class, their chance of finding a spouse is significantly reduced, thus starting a family, having children and actually ‘solving’ the problem of population won’t span a generation.  Instead, it will bring a skew of sexual energy that cannot be contained.

Perhaps that is why Germany adopted the legalization of Prostitution, in an attempt to provide an outlet for the skew and attempt to level the need to rape.   Unfortunately, prostitutes cost money, and the immigrants don’t have the funds, nor the inclination, nor the belief system in that regard.  When immigrants are mostly male, uneducated, and in poverty they are not considered viable spouses and will not solve the need to secure ‘pensions’ as productive members of society.   So essentially, the immigrant solution initiated by Merkel in conjunction with the UN will ultimately have the reverse effect and tilt the axis of violence, welfare, and the economy.

While Germany has been labeled Europe’s biggest brothel, it is estimated that 63% of its sex workers are foreign.    Germany has a law in place that brothels must register and get a license to operate.  If they serve alcohol, they must get a restaurant license as well.  Despite these regulations, Germany also admits that most brothels are owned by organized crime, those known to be trafficking guns, drugs, and humans.  So essentially, the German government, in accordance with UN instruction, is condoning organized crime in order to support the massive immigrant population that Merkel thinks will resolve the lacking functioning workforce through a cultural socio diversity that has no education or moral norms.

This has absolutely nothing to do with Human Rights.

The Caravans of immigrants honing in on the US-Mexico border are typically in the 80% range of male dominance.    They are typically uneducated, without resources, and thus often resort to criminal activities in order to survive.  They leave behind their women and children to fend for themselves in their country.

It is much like the adage; give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach him to fish and he is independent.   If our hearts are truly about helping the immigrant, then teaching them to fish means ‘in their own country’ with ‘their female population’ so as to maintain the balance and not further shift the axis of genders.

The countries with the largest skew in gender are Qatar, India and China.   In Qatar, the skew is represented by a slave labor force.  In China it was an imposed birthing law. And in India it was a ‘value’ added belief in which male children would contribute more than female.   India also has some of the most brutal rape statistics. While China and its media consider any statistics or information on this to be strictly censored, an interesting article by a young female from the UK who studied in Xiamen provided insight into the rallying call for prostitutes and rape in a country where gender skews are among the highest.

Many countries, including Australia, have in place laws that require immigrants to be able to prove their monetary self sufficiency, and/or their employability, so that their benefit to society is factored.  So why is the US so often targeted despite housing 11 million illegal immigrants and 44 million legal immigrants?  Statistically, it is a bizarre assault.

Was Jesus an immigrant?  NO.  He was a citizen of the Roman Empire.  Genghis Khan was defect immigrant via his conquests…   Hitler immigrated to Germany.   That didn’t work out so well.

In the end, what Merkel in Germany, and the Obamaites in the US are advocating is not the human right to immigrate, it is the slave labor right that is advanced in a monarchial society wherein historically, poverty was amassed and subjugated to the rule of the King and his court.  It is what created the mass exodus of Europeans to the Americas in the first place.

Africa’s Expatriate Wealthy Demand UN Climate Change Billions…

More clarity into the UN Climate Change Pact has been revealed – perhaps somewhat inadvertently by Deutsche Welle.   For all intents and purposes, Africa has already fallen.  China, the EU and to a lesser extent the US have taken over the five largest cities including;  Congo’s Kinshasa, Nigeria’s Lagos, Egypt’s Cairo, Tanzania’s Dar es Salaam and Angola’s Luanda.   According to the EU, these cities face ‘extreme risks’ from climate warming. And funds need to be made available immediately to mitigate the losses that the EU might encounter as they have ramped up business exploitation for over a decade…or two.

Luanda:  A valuable port city, the official language is Portuguese.   They host a Chinese community, a Latin American community and of course, a sizable Portuguese community.   While 53% of locals live in poverty, lack clean drinking water, have limited electricity, and live in squalor housing, luxury construction for the wealthy is booming!     The government has solicited a Chinese firm to build what they call ‘social housing’.  The 53% slum population will be removed from the streets and housed in these facilities so that additional renovation, infrastructure and luxury housing construction can continue for the wealthy expatriates.

Kinshasa:  Located along the second largest river in Africa, The Congo, primary language is – French.   Affluent residential and commercial areas and three universities are flanked by an ever shifting slum community.   Every year, as wealthy development inside the city continues unabated, the slums are shifted to the outer periphery.   The UN has a headquarters in Kinshasa and as recently as 2016 deployed ‘peacekeeping troops’ to stabilize unrest.   NGO’s play a prominent role in the local government, including the Belgium Development Agency.  China has an $8.5 billion loan outstanding for infrastructure development.   Corruption is rampant, poverty is rife, and war is a constant – to eliminate the undesirables and allow room for the new wealth.

Dar es Salaam:  The city experienced one of Africa’s fastest urbanization rates as businesses were opened and prospered, growth in the construction sector with multi-story building, bridges and roads.  Tanzanian Banks headquartered in the city started to run more proper,and the Dar es Salaam stock exchange expanded.  The Harbor proved to be the most important in Tanzania and prominent for entrepot trade with landlocked countries like eastern Rwanda, Burundi and Zambia.  The CBD skyline hosts tall buildings, among them the 35-floor PSPF Tower, finished in 2015, and the Tanzania PortAuthority (TPA) Tower, currently under construction. Diplomats and expatriates revel in the white sands of Oysterbay and Coco Beach.   According to the UN, 70% of locals live in slums.   But not to worry, with squash courts, white sand beaches, a darts club, golf, soccer and fitness clubs throughout the wealthier sectors, the city is insulated from the riff raff.

Lagos:  2/3 of the cities population live in slums…

Do you see the pattern yet?  Need I say more?

In other words, Africa has been systematically developed by China and the EU for a wealthy expatriate contingent.  That contingent desires better infrastructure, water, power, and retail in order to sustain their lifestyle.   The local population will ultimately be housed in barracks where they will not defray the views, and will be available for labor at the behest of the lords and ladies.   These countries all host a largess youth population averaging over 50% of the entire population, making the labor force more valuable.  They have a huge emigration population residing in the US, EU, and UK, while the wealthier residents that live in these cities come from the US, the UK, and the EU.

This is – the shift.  

Macron, Merkel and May allow unlimited migrants to take over their flailing countries, while their own wealthy emigrate to Africa and then demand that their cities and townships meet the standards to which they are accustomed while providing a largess slave labor force at their disposal.   All, provided for via the Climate Change, Global Warming Hoax demanding $100 billion annually to fund – their colossal compounds in the continent most affected by global warming – Africa.

They have sold their countries, their people, to the ravages of immigrant terrorists while moving to the same continent that the immigrants are fleeing.  Albeit with a purse of $100 billion paid for by you – and – I.  Sure, open the borders to more illegal ravaging.   The end game has been in play for possibly two or three decades.  The resources, the climate, the beaches, were always the draw.  But how to rid these lavish sultan cities of the scourge?

Open borders.

And if you thought this was a ‘white supremacy’ racist agenda, think again… Obama.

UN Migration Pact: Ponzi Scam

While speaking before the UN General Assembly, Germany’s Merkel made an interesting announcement:  If 2/3rds of the UN member states, totaling 193, vote for the Migration Pact, then The Pact will be adopted for ALL member states and will become legally binding.   To date, there are not nearly enough countries that have opted out.  Therefore, the only way to not be subject to the law of the Pact, would be to completely drop out of the UN.  There are only three countries that are non-members:  Vatican City, Kosovo, and Palestine.

On December 19th, the final vote will determine whether this Migration rule of law will proceed.

The legal issue is inserted because of the new definition of migration – Human Right.  Therefore, while the pact loosely states it is non-binding, in fact the rule of law would pursue a violation of Human Rights against a country that does not comply.   Brought before the International Criminal Court, the UN and its court can recommend sanctions, and demand reparations for ‘victims’.  Acting as a mega-NGO, the UN could create a class-action of migrants that were disallowed into states that refused, and order those UN member states to pay off the migrant for violating his/her Human Right to migrate.

In addition, anyone, including the media, who thereafter references ‘illegal migration’ can be charged with criminal hate speech and subject to jail and fines.

A few days ago, the Leader of the latest Mexican Caravan demanded $50,000 for every migrant that came to Tijuana and was not permitted into the US.  Currently, that would be considered extortion.  Under ICC law, the UN could impose those fees and redefine them as reparation once the Migration Pact becomes law.

The members this UN/NGO would likely target first would be those who refused to sign;  US, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Israel, Switzerland, and Slovakia.

While the Pact claims to be non-binding, the UN gives itself the power to ‘collectively manage’ migration for all countries so as to protect human rights whereby ‘illegal’ immigration no longer exists as borders are open to anyone and everyone.  While the UN claims that member states must still ‘manage borders in an integrated, secure and coordinated manner,” and to ‘increase legal certainty and predictability of migration procedures,’ they are assuring that they, the UN, have no monetary responsibility to assure that borders are orderly.  Nor will they have any financial responsibility to send immigrants to their designated country, those costs would be born by the country’s taxpayers.

Both the Pope and the UN Special Rapporteur, Felipe Morales, have stated that the US needs to buck up and take in anyone and everyone or face charges… given security should not over-shadow Human Rights.

Bottom Line:  this is classic legal double-speak which means that a country is not bound to accept immigrants, however, if they don’t, they may be subject to Criminal Human Rights Violation Charges by the ICC and subject to whatever monetary and other outcomes this court determines.

UN Migration Pact: Global Order By UN

On December 10 and 11 the world governments will come together to sign the UN Migration Pact. So far the US, Hungary, Poland, Austria, Czech Republic, Israel, Australia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Switzerland and Italy have withdrawn approval.  Why?

The Pact is an ongoing attempt to globalize governments into the rule of International Law whereby decisions are arbitrated on behalf of a country given “no state can address migration alone”.   Further, the Pact states that data collection will become a strategized goal whereby a global programme will determine a countries national capacity. This data will be reviewed by the UN Statistical Commission annually in cooperation with the World Bank Global Knowledge Partnership on Migration and Development.  Migration will no longer be classified as having a refugee status, all migrants will be created equal.  And all arms will point back to the global powerhead – the UN!

Within this Migration Pact, the 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development will be forefront.  Migration as a result of Climate Change will ensure the human rights of those affected taking in recommendations from ‘state-led’ consultants.  In so doing all immigrants will receive a work permit, a certificate of nationality, counseling, legal guidance on their rights according to International Law, gender responsive support, training, and a job.  As their Human Right.

As Africa sees mass exodus as a direct result of these freebies, African states will likely be more vulnerable and subject to takeover.  Land grabs will be more prolific and Green Climate Funds derived from the Paris Accord will suddenly make sense in their diversion.  Full circle to a Continent untapped and in need of vast infrastructure improvement in order to adequately cultivate those resources.  Ta-Da – Africa Couped!

In the meantime, the UN will extend their arm of Global Leader.  The division of Africa will come under the control and mandate of the UN, and those with insider rule will WIN.

As of 2015, the countries whose ODA (Official Development Assistance) was concentrated in Africa include: Portugal, Ireland, Belgium, and Iceland. The US contributed the greatest dollar amount covering 30% of all contributions to Africa.

The 2030 Agenda, which is lovingly referred to as the New Agenda, states that the means of implementation of a Utopian world will only be able to be accomplished via a ‘Global Partnership’ whereby global solidarity is paramount.  The New Agenda lays out The Addis Ababa Action Agenda as the means to finance the litany of Agendas:    “…a commitment to a new ‘social compact’ in which countries commit to set up social protection systems, with national spending targets for essential services like health and education. If countries cannot funds these through domestic resources, the international community pledges to provide international assistance.

Countries also agreed to work together to fund infrastructure for energy, transport, and water and sanitation, as well as step-up investments in agriculture and nutrition. There was also a commitment to establish a ‘facilitation mechanism’ to promote innovation and scientific cooperation, identify technology needs and gaps, and support capacity building on technology.” 

Countries will fund these Agendas by committing a percentage of Gross National Income.

Of course, the biggest issue in implementing Addis Ababa was Tax.  Therefore, the UN created a new programme entitled, Tax Inspectors Without Borders.   They will help countries to collect and audit the implemented tax that will fund the fund that funds that funds the fund within the ODA fund that gives the money to recreate Africa after all the mass exodus of natives and their relocation with freebies across the EU, North and South America.

As of 2018, these Tax Inspectors managed to raise $414 million.

Given that by simple Geographics the EU is the closest land mass for the African exodus, a quota that includes all countries across the globe is necessary in order to disperse according to the UN’s determination of  ‘capacity’.   Guidelines will map global sites of entry and the UN will determine the welfare administration of these displaced migrants.

Currently, war and conflicts have been the primary means of achieving exodus.  But this was based on refugee status and excluded simple immigrants. These UN provisions would alter that censorship of migration and Open Borders to all.   It extends the global power hold that the UN has been ramping up for decades within a body that grossly mismanages its own funds according to their latest audit, is mired in sex trafficking, rape and sexual assaults in Africa, and seems to in reality have ‘accomplished’ nothing other than to hold countless discussions and make empty meaningless promises.

The New World Order is under the gun and fighting a ravage brawl in its home base of Germany.   You just can’t make this stuff up!

All of this is being done in the name of “Mother Earth”, according to the UN.  Scottie beam me aboard the Mother Ship – NOW!

Immigration: A History Lesson

There are Seven major conflicts going on in Africa right now – and the media is silent.   All involve some form of ISIS, Al-Qaeda or Boko Haram. The death toll is well over 400,000 – in Sudan alone – and the media hasn’t uttered a peep.  The war in Myanmar has been ongoing since 1948, Somali since 1991, Nigeria since 1998 and Mali since 2002.   The war in Afghanistan remains as the largest number of casualties cumulatively at over 2,000,000 and for 2018 – 36,000.  And not a peep out of the media.  Instead they focus on Trump’s Tweets and Melania’s Christmas decorations and a faded prostitute who can’t pay her bills.

In Myanmar, like Syria, the number of small fragmented opposition armies are disjointed and their affiliation a veritable guessing game, however China would appear to be the largest outside player which is likely why no one else wants to become involved.

In 1992, the UN attempted to integrate into the Somalia conflict only to run home a beleaguered failure after suffering significant casualties by 1995.  Never returning.  In 2006, Islam entered the territory and became the defacto Rebel Group in the form of Al-Shabaab, Al-Qaeda and ISIL.  The UN attempted to integrate Muslims into the government in 2009 as a means of peace, but the people revolted and war re-erupted.

Most of the wars have a similar core – Islam.

And still, the UN decries – integration as the answer.

The immigrant invasions precipitated by the Huns and other barbarians ended with the conquest of Rome and ultimately led to The Fall Of The Roman Empire sometime between 450 and 500 AD.   Mismanagement allowed the invasions.  Ultimately, The Fall ushered in The Dark Ages of chaos, death, famine and disease.

The Turkic people of Asia, Europe and North Africa were forced into migration during the rise of Islam under Muhammad between the 6thand 11thcenturies.  Chaos ensued.

In the 19thcentury over 50 million people fled the horrors of Europe and settled in the US as a result of migrant chaos.

Migration has seen the collapse of entire societies.  When migrants from Europe began to descend on the US, they came through Ellis Island where they were required to submit to a health examination, legal checks to assure they were not criminals, and a head tax.  The Immigration Act of 1891 stated that persons likely to become public charges, persons suffering from certain contagious disease, felons, persons convicted of other crimes or misdemeanors, polygamists, aliens assisted by others by payment of passage would not be admitted.  Those who did not comply with these rules were deported.

In 1870 Chinese immigrants were specifically not allowed, only white and blacks were allowed per the Naturalization Act.  In 1901 the Anarchist Exclusion Act allowed for the prohibition of an immigrant based on their political beliefs.  And in 1907 American women were prohibited from bringing foreign men nto the US as citizens based on marriage.

The Italian Mafia immigrated to the US from Sicily during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  Settling in New York and other major cities on the east coast, they immediately banded to create controlled territories where racketeering, smuggling, fraud, money laundering, robbery, etc… were their mainstay.  They were – immigrants.

Migration caused the riff that is Islamic Pakistani’s vs. Buddhist and Hindu Indians.  It has NOT resolved.

The Bolsheviks, revolutionized under Lenin, were factioned in Switzerland and Germany while Lenin lived there, and founded the Marxist media outlet, “Forward”.  They followed him back to Russia wherein the Bloody Revolution was instituted and Russia fell to communist rule for decades.   Many if not most Bolsheviks – were immigrants.

For the media to continue to hail the fact that the US was built on immigration is censoring the entire story and virtually rewriting history.

Immigration has led to the fall of Empires since the beginning of history.  It has created massive wars, the death of millions, the destruction of homelands, and the loss of societal rule.

The UN and European governments are well aware of this fact and yet it would appear that despite history they embrace the absolute collapse of all of Europe in the coming future as cultures clash, crime spirals out of control, and the military and police are told by their governments to – stand down.  Rape is now considered a ‘cultural norm’ and dismissed.  Sharia Law is upheld.   Europe is facing a catastrophic fall parallel to The Great Fall of Rome.

And like every great historical collapse, it is not about The People – it is about a Revolution built on Communism/Socialism/Power and Evil.

Each successive US President has advocated for the same thing;  border wall, illegal stagnation, and retribution for those who attempt to circumvent US Law.  And somehow, Trump is the ‘demon’.   The reality is that Merkel, Macron and May have sold Europe to chaos.   I would venture, this is not the will of The People.  It is however, the will of the Government, and as such is being actioned.  To what gain?  TO the absolute fall of Europe as was historically The Fall Of Rome which ushered in a dark age, and the ultimate auto rule of The Vatican as Lord over Kings, Queens, and People.

It does not define the Catholic People, it defines a corrupt Vatican.   It does not define a Political People, it defines a corrupt government.  A corrupt power block.  And it is time, to take back our world.  It is time to shift the axis from the imbalance of evil and embrace – good.

Because in a universe that thrives on good and evil, sometimes, the balance skews.  Don’t give up.  It is more important than ever to fight!   Faith!  Hope!  We will Overcome!

 

Good vs. Evil: An Imbalance.

Our Universe is created within the absolutes of good and evil.  One can not exist without the other, just as light only exists because there is darkness.  Our small world is subject to these universal laws.  Our genetic makeup predisposes us to certain diseases, such as cancer and Alzheimers, it also predicates down syndrome and intellect.   Christians believe that every human’s DNA consists of the knowledge of God.  It is also accepted that every individual is born with good and evil DNA.   Two questions:   Could a genetic mutation cause a persons’ good and evil balance to be askew?   Could that skew be ‘genetically modified’?

Society.

Thousands of years and every society known to man has created a concept of good and evil representative according to their unique vision.  Mythology, Paganism they always depict good vs evil in some form. Christianity has God vs Satan. The American Indians had Ioskeha and Tawiscara as their good and evil symbolism.  The forces of these two opponents that battle for eternity can shift wherein an imbalance occurs and Discordia reigns.

Everything on this natural God-made earth was intricately created in a perfect pattern.  In the rain forest it is most evident.  Every creature, every flora, have a purpose. Disrupt that purpose, extract a single subject matter of the natural flow and the entire rain forest system begins to implode devolving into chaos.

GMO’s have are their advocates and their naysayers.  Many things on our planet have undergone genetic modification for a century from genetically modified flowers so that we can have flowers in abundance, to genetically modified fruits so we can grow them year round, to fish farms, dairy cow hormones, etc…   But despite the efforts of science, no human life can be created from ‘scratch’, not even a seed, which is why we have seed banks.

GMO flowers have no scent, GMO fruits lack the same vitamins and minerals, and farm fish have no color, it has to be injected into them.   The GMO Yellow Rice was a complete horror as it had little nutrient value.  But that hasn’t deterred science.  They have manipulated weather patterns having no idea what the negative ramifications will be, they have injected us with vaccines without any testing as to the entire cocktail effect, and they now want to inject particles into the atmosphere to black the sun so as to slow global warming.

Back to good and evil.

Every one of us has witnessed people whose balance of evil seems chaotic.  Is the imbalance a choice?  Does a person have the free will to choose?  Or is the discord a genetic mutation that can be modified… like a flower, like fruit?   And will doing so potentially remove a person’s soul, like the loss of scent or nutrients?

On the other side of the coin, many of us have personally witnessed people whose balance of good seems phenomenally out of proportion.  There are incredibly amazing heroes in our midst that we rarely recognize. Military soldiers.  They make ‘a choice’ within free will to eject themselves into chaos and risk death and torture.  They suffer fallout that we now call PTSD.   This doesn’t mean ‘the military’ I refer to individuals.

They are a sort of super human in that their balance of good far outweighs their balance of evil.

Enter Science.

Science more often than not does not recognize consequences.   Science will do nearly anything in order to change the natural course, in order to genetically modify everything God created.   Including humans.

If science experimented with humans – modifying their genetics so as to create a human more good or more evil, what would be the consequence?

Science is infinitely arrogant. Manipulating a person’s natural genetics without knowing the extent of the consequences, that person would no longer have free will to choose, nor would that person be able to refer back to their original self.  They would in essence become a GMO, a genetically modified organism.  But we know that science has been feverishly working for decades to implant AI in humans, to bionically alter humans, to create a super human – without understanding that such alterations may also result in that human losing their soul.

Evil in this world has shifted to an imbalance.  It is out of concordance.  It is not natural.  To think that ‘choosing’ evil over good is the only cause seems somewhat short sighted. When our heroes are diluted and evil men and women are praised, certainly the powers of evil have risen beyond their natural evolutionary boundaries and there is something more involved than simply ‘choice’.  And science, transhumanism, AI, super humans, genetically modified humans seems more and more a possibility.

Facebook And The Rise of Socialists in US

Zuckerberg has now found himself in the unholy crossfires of not just Hillary, but Soros, who has aligned with Trillium Asset Management’s CEO, Mat Prasky, to call for Zuckerberg’s resignation.  Why? Because Facebook bloggers have had the audacity to malign Soros in their posts.  

Facebook found itself in the doghouse with Hillary as she blamed it for her presidential bid loss due to ‘negative posts’ that Zuckerberg did not promptly censor, like a good Socialist/Communist should.  Soros finds himself in the same predicament and has decided the analytics are too permissive and must be wholly liberal.

Full Circle:   Trillium bills itself as a “Green Fund” and Prasky upholds that ideology within his Board memberships including Social Venture Network which has honored such notable companies as Green For All.  Green For All was launched at the Clinton Global Initiative in 2007 by founder, Van Jones, who sits on the Board of Social Venture Network .  Van Jones served as President Obama’s advisor for Green Jobs and has been covered extensively by CNN, New York Times, USA Today and The View.  Like Obama, Jones’ monetary rewards would seem to coincide with his two published books, which like Obama’s made the NYT best seller list.

Jones is backed by the NAACP, Ebony, Rockefeller, Rolling Stone, Elle, Time Magazine, World Economic Forum, etc…  He has worked with Moveon.org under Soros, and The Center For American Progress under Podesta.  Jones is a viable Socialist candidate being groomed for a future presidential bid.

Facebook is recognized as a most powerful exploitive tool to gain control of and create a person’s ‘opinion’.   Although Zuckerberg is aligned with Hillary and Soros, he did not shore up fast enough, and the Cabal needs to take over in time to assert a Coup of American politics if not in 2020, then in 2024.

And the new rumbling isn’t so much the progressives per se, as the Socialists who run under the guise of the Democratic ticket because they haven’t yet gained the necessary power to act independently.  It would appear, according to various Socialist party websites, that their tactic is to capitalize on a growing base, hide within the Democrat party until 2023 when they plan to rise up within the call for a “Revolution” reminiscent of the Bolsheviks.

College students lean toward Liberal Green agenda’s without any understanding of Socialism and its massively destructive ramifications.  Creating a Green profile platform for 2024 will secure their support.  Van Jones is black.  With the radical dysphoria infused in the US by the Liberals to divide whites and blacks, that population segment will further splinter and Jones will rise as a Socialist black man advocating for people of color and youth. The Democrat Party will likely collapse as the old suits die off and their crimes gain traction in the media. This die off will push traditional Democrats toward the Socialist Party.

According to the website, Democratic Socialists of America, during the midterms they voted in 4 congressional candidates, 12 nationally endorsed elected officials, 30 locally endorsed elected officials, and 35 locally endorsed ballot initiatives in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Hawaii, Rhode Island, DC, Montano, Maine, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Massachusetts, Maryland, Missouri, Oregon, Texas, Tennessee, and Washington.

Their event schedule for November 18th:  How To Do Targeted Advertising On Facebook.

Oddly, many people in the US are not educated in the ideology and history of Socialism, what it means, what it entails, and historical leaders who attempted to govern under this dictatorial means:

1)   Venezuela is the most recent catastrophic result of a Socialist government policy.  Nicolas Madura is the current President ruling under the United Socialist Party under a program that has been referred to as authoritarian and dictatorial and has been instrumental in the complete chaotic collapse of the entire economic and social system plague by an inflation rate of 1million percent.

2)   The National Socialist Workers’ Party or the Nazi’s were the children of Hitler. Germany was in a free fall and in 1931 during the Great Depression, Hoover called a moratorium on WWI reparations to Germany causing widespread collapse of banks and industries.  1933 Hitler came to power under the guise of freeing Germany from the tyranny of economic collapse.

3)   The Bolsheviks were factions within the Russian Social Democratic Party following the ideology of Socialist, Karl Marx.  Lenin was a dictator who became leader of the Socialist Revolution ultimately throwing Russia into Communist rule for decades.

The US is not without socialist reforms; welfare, Medicaid, public schools, etc…  But just as Germany has instituted more and more control over citizen’s freedoms, so has the US with the assistance of the media as they redefine and recreate history to virtually ‘uneducate’ The People.

You cannot have globalization without Socialism.  You cannot have Socialism without a dictatorship government.  While Merkel appears more and more defeated as she calls for the UN to be the governing world body, this remains the agenda amidst a splintering EU, an uninformed Macron, and a collapsing Theresa May.

The common denominator for Venezuela, Hitler and the Bolsheviks was ‘Youth”.  Garner the youth, call for a revolution, and institute a civil war.  I believe that is the same call the Socialists are advocating in the US today… Buyer Beware.