The Two Faces of Europe

The New and Improved Europe. There are two parallel Europe’s that would seem to exist simultaneously yet on quite different plains of reality. The one that is presented by their censored media, and an alternate universe where people are subjected to something akin to the insanity of Alice in Wonderland.

In 2016, a Swedish woman in her sixties was brutally attacked, left unconscious and bloody, by a gang of ‘unaccompanied’ Muslim youth.  No one was charged in the assault because it might sway public perception of crime.  But the woman took to Facebook when she recovered and wrote statements warning people to reject all that is Islam.  A criminal investigation was opened against the woman.  Her keys, phone and ipad were confiscated.  A 150 page report detailed her racist speech and she has been sentenced to prison.

A father and his daughter were on a train in Germany when a migrant reached under the daughter’s dress and groped her sexually.  The father punched the migrant in the face.  The father is being charged with assault.

A video has surfaced which illustrates how as part of the ‘curriculum’, young Dutch school children in the Netherlands routinely participate in are visits to Mosques where they learn how to bow and pray to Allah.

In Germany, a 14 year old girl wrote  a poem depicting a refugee as a rapist.  She received the most applause for the poem which qualified her to win first place. Left wing organizers claimed she was a Nazi propagandist and disqualified her.  The girl’s home was vandalized and defaced.

Two migrants aged 14 and 16 year committed robbery at a mall and took two Swedish boys hostage.  The two 15 year old Swedish boys were burned and abused, threatened with a knife, beaten with sticks, and repeatedly kicked in the face.  The migrants videotaped the entire ordeal – and apparently seven additional ordeals perpetrated against Swedish youth.   The 14 year was not charged due to his age, and the 16 year old was prosecuted for ‘robbery’.

While the US media might try and blame Trump for everything divisive in the US, the European media simply censors any story involving refugees or migrants.  Buried.

The mayor of the island of Lesbos in Greece argues that the EU is doing nothing to assist with the immigration problems.  His people are tired, they want a resolution, and none is pending.   And while the German media outlet, DW, prints a scathing article about a charity group that is visiting refugee camps in Syria and Lebanon, claiming the group is Islamophobic because it wants to help Muslims stay in their respective countries, the question arises – why don’t you want Syrians in Syria?

When looked at within the broader context, it would appear that the Agenda is far more sinister than we can imagine.

Given the Deutsche Weil is owned exclusively by the German government with significant influence from Soros regarding what it prints, if returning refugees to their country or origin was never a consideration – that would support the conspiracy that the entire Syrian war was ‘staged’  and that ridding Europe of any remaining remnants of Christianity was a larger goal.

The charity organization that DW is attempting to demonize is called Alternative Help Association.  They advocate helping Muslims remain in their country of origin so as to stem the flow into Europe and thus maintain the historical Christian identity of Europe.  Oddly, DW would seem to take great offense at the notion that Europe was built on Christianity, and would seem to attest to the organization being a fraud.

Oddly, Merkel is also working to stem the flow of migrants coming thru Lebanon, albeit in an entirely different way.  Instead of giving money and aid to the migrants she purports to tax Germans in order to give money to the Lebanese government.  Last year, Merkel gave Lebanon $443 million, this year the ante is up.

Lebanon has won loans and grants totaling more than $11 billion.  Why?  Because President Hariri, the same Hariri who was kidnapped by the Saudi’s last year and told what to do lest the Saudi’s destroy Lebanon like Yemen, that Harari, wants to rebuild his country.  Donors include Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, France, Germany, World Bank, IMF, The EU and The Netherlands – the land of money laundering…

Prior to the Syrian war, Lebanon was thriving well with annual growth over 9%.   But Hariri was growing closer to the Shiite Hezbollah and Iran which promulgated a Saudi interference – money for loyalty.

While Merkel and her spokesman would portray her open borders to millions of Muslim immigrants as heartfelt, that heart would not seem to apply to Germans, Swedes, Dutch, French and the thousands upon thousands who have suffered physical assault, sexual assault, and trauma as a result.

In essence, it would seem that the deal is between Merkel, Juncker and the Saudi’s who have quietly compiled a huge arsenal that they are not afraid to use in the event their bidding is not obeyed.  Because the Merkel image of heart is definitely quite staged.

Red October: The Socialist Revolution in the US

An interesting reference keeps popping up;  Red October. 

On October 25, 1917, the Bolshevik Revolution set in motion a Socialist coup in Russia, toppling and ultimately executing every member of the Tzar family of Nicolas II, including his five daughters, on July 18, 1918.   It was the Russian Revolution that ushered in Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Marx and ultimately Stalin.  This Revolution ushered in the Communist Soviet Union.

Lenin is quoted as saying, “The people have waited long enough for an armed uprising.”  And he gave it to them.  But little did they understand that the Communist block would separate a few from the many, and the many would suffer.

This is the same Soviet Union that drove the Russian people into poverty, that stagnated growth, that saw the assassination of 3.5 to 60 million people as Stalin sought to eradicate all those opposing the institution of the working class – slaves.  Despite the atrocities committed by Stalin, he was hailed Man Of The Year by Time Magazine in 1940 – and was a friend of both Churchill and FDR.  Yes, this heinous Dictator and Assassin, was lauded by our US President and the PM of Britain…

We continue to hear these same cries for an “Uprising” – only not in Russia, but in the US.  The cries come from Hollywood, from Liberals, from feminists, from prestigious universities who are moving from the traditional Democrat platform to a Socialist platform.   Not because they have the vaguest understanding of what it embodies or what it has done historically, but because – it sounds good…

Today, in that light, Obama has announced his endorsement of Ocasio-Cortez, a Socialist who has shown a complete and utter lack of knowledge, economic understanding, foreign understanding or relative business acumen.   She has no background of any content worthy of an endorsement, except that she advocates for a Dictatorship government aligned with the Red October Bolsheviks.  And that means absolute – Control.

Are we witnessing the same Ashkenazi Jewish revolt for power that was successful in the eradication of historical Russia for 70 years?  Is this the agenda for the US?

There is an alternate reference to Red October.  The Book – Film in which a submarine equipped with nuclear warheads could subvert it’s supposed mission as an anti-Russian vessel and actually attack – the US!  The concept being – who do we trust? Who is real?  Who is for the American People?  Is everything upside down?

Because the Swamp government would seem to want us dead, would seem to want America to fall, as we were considered one of two bastions that could not be controlled – the other being Russia.

The movie drama takes place between the 1980’s and 1990’s – which would coincide with the Clinton bid for Globalization Control.  And may be relevant to the destabilization that betrayal creates.

In either case, Red October does not foretell a story that is embraced as good, healthy and in our best interest.  It is a – warning.  And we need to be vigilant.  We need to heed

It reveals the fact that we have no idea who is for us – and who is against us – as our friends are our enemies and our enemies our friends.

While the division that has engulfed our country for the last five decades is very real and growing exponentially, the fact that Socialism has emerged as an alternative can actually serve to benefit the conservatives as voters on the left become divided.  These divides have historically ushered in candidates that would not have ordinarily won an election.   In that light, Obama’s betrayal of the conventional Democrat in favor of the Socialist is an interesting phenomena that could see a shift in the coming months and years… for more conservative draws.

I find it interesting that the same Hollywood that chastises the People for conspiracy theories, is itself the progenitor of Conspiracy Theories!   Hollywood has portrayed the corruption of government, the fraud of wars, the devastation of Big Pharma, ad nauseam… and yet, suddenly, they want us to believe that – oops, change of mind, change of logic, change…   The narrative is clear.   The Swamp has existed for decades.   The Swamp needs to be drained or we will be the next Communist controlled country.

Hold onto your books!  They will ultimately become our Truth!  And historically, we can expect these Truths, these Books will be destroyed, banned, eliminated from knowledge.

Because the burning of history is the ultimate means to control.

France Charges Marin Le Pen with Mental Illness! Politicizing Psychiatry

France has figured out how to guarantee a political party victory!   Relentlessly attack the opposing parties leader, charge her with the crime of racism when she posts images of ISIS beheading people, concoct a malfeasance charge that could land her in jail, black all her campaign funding right before an election and the piece de resistance – order her to get a psyche evaluation!  The premise for the psyche?  She is Islamaphobic because of her rhetoric regarding immigration.

Marin Le Pen stands to disappear into the bowels of a psyche ward where release is not an option. Where she could be detained and confined for an indeterminent period of time as psychiatrists evaluate her mental stability.

This horror means that a person’s stance on politics is grounds for a mental psychiatric pronouncement. This is not a ‘threat’ this has been ordered by a judge.

We saw the same threat made against Trump by online Liberal Psychiatrists who claimed they could evaluate him without knowing him, but by observing him on television.  Not only did the statements disappear, but the profession was made a mockery by this wholly unprofessional unethical pronouncement.

Has the psychiatric industry gone bonkers?

According to psychiatry.org, a mental illness is likely if:  a person has a change in appetite, a person’s sleep habits change, a person’s mood changes, problems thinking, increased sensitivity, apathy, feeling disconnected, illogical thinking, and the all encompassing – unusual behavior.

And you don’t have to experience all of these feelings – just one or two and you may have a mental illness.

I imagine all these behaviors could be applied to nearly every politician, if not every living person on the planet at some point, including the psychiatrists.   But despite an ethic’s violation, this methodology was attempted against Trump in 2017.  Led by psychologist, John Gartner, his Twitter account reflects his own psychotic fixation with everything anti-Donald Trump.

How did Gartner and others defy Section 7 of the American Psychiatric Association principles of ethics?  They claimed they were not members of that organization and thus not bound by ethics, instead they copped another organization as their grantor, The American Psychological Association.   This association has no ethics clause.  And so their members are free to make any derogatory statement they please without consideration.   The current President of APA is Jessica Henderson Daniel, a vocal opponent of Trump and Trump policies.  As a black woman, her particular passion is empowering young black girls.  And while they have an upcoming conference titled, “Civility”, it would appear that their members feel that civil response is one sided – everyone else needs to exercise this norm – unless of course they are discussing – Trump.

APA’s CEO, Arthur Evans Jr., has also ingratiated himself in the Trump administration’s appointment process by denouncing Gina Haspel as Trump’s pick for head of the CIA.  A black man, he was recognized by the Obama administration for his ‘endeavors’.

In 1964, the same tactic was attempted to bring down Barry Goldwater  when a magazine, Fact, sought to make psychological statements about his mental health claiming he was unfit for office.   The editors included Ralph Ginzburg whose claim to fame was publishing magazines with erotica that ultimately resulted in his conviction by the federal government for violation of obscenity laws.  The other editor, Warren Boroson claimed that the infamous article was actually written by an Israeli, David Bar-Illan.  Goldwater sued and the resulting suit triggered the ethics policy of Section 7 for the American Psychiatric Association.  Both Editors were decidedly – Liberal Democrats.

In 2006, Duke University published an article claiming that 49% of all US Presidents suffered from mental health issues.   Obviously Duke is not a member of the ethics standard given they could not possibly have interviewed any president.  But it is a catch-all commentary that begs – who wasn’t?

Still, the power play remains.  But in this case it isn’t the power play of politicians, it is the god-like self view among some members of the psychiatric and psychology fields who feel they can make an analysis without ever seeing the individual.  And in fact, analyze the psyche of a dead person.  To what end?   Power.  Self greatness.   Self promotion.  Celebrity status.

In the case of Marin Le Pen, it has taken the unprecedented evolution of politicizing opinion as a mental illness…

Their power is very real.  Imagine a psychiatrist arbitrarily making a determination regarding your mental health because you wrote a post on Facebook that they thought was illogical which leads to your incarceration into an institution?

What Do You Want?

We all have an aspiration, somewhere, whether buried or on the surface, it exists, it is simply a matter of whether it is recognized and it is acted upon.   My time may be limited, yet, my desire to have this one success, simmers, and then sometimes bursts like a volcanic lava flow in a small pool.  You see, I am not largess.  I don’t need a stage.  And if it doesn’t happen, I will not be devastated.  It is simply, – a wish.   “I wish upon a star…”.  DO you?

Lately, it has become an interesting question given the attitudes that prevail in the news media.  The expletives that spew are rampant and far beyond the PG-13 television rating.   The lack of respect is … challenging.  Challenging because I really don’t understand this place.  I don’t understand the arrogance that believes respect is not available or deserving…   Who are you to decide?   You decry the religious right who declare judgment, and then become judgment personified!   How dare you!

So what is your aspiration?  What would be your dream in a perfect world – if you could have ‘ONE’ wish.

The only caveat is the caveat that you may not declare yourself judge and jury, you may declare yourself ‘an opinion’.  And no, your one wish is not that you can have a 1000 or 1 million wishes.   I tried that!

Who decides?  Who dictates the rules?  IS it really the government or is it another shadow within the rule of Order that was established hundreds of years ago?

Why is it so important that it succeed?

I imagine that at one point there was an honorable reason for the rule.  But, like a telephone conversation, the rule morphed, it’s definition altered, and soon, it represented little of its original intent.  And was in fact, virtually unrecognizable.

And as the game depicts, if we can’t keep the truth alive for two to three sharings, how can we possibly keep it honest for a day?

For by the time truth is revealed, it has been ravaged of tens of storms, and perhaps thousands of tracts.  Leaving truth to be a mere thread of the cloth.   And without the entire garment, it covers very little.

UNESCO: US Land Grabs!

A recent article purported to show a scathing fact about Liberal Harvard University’s disastrous environmental land grab record that would surely align them with the likes of Hillarygate, Sorosgate, Rothschildgate in their quest to own the vast majority of world resources through Land Grabs. 

But there is another more deadly culprit, an organization that has been systemically doing exactly the same thing all within the guidance and legalize ushered in through Clinton and Obama – UNESCO. The UN!

Oddly, UNESCO, which stands for “United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization” has extended their rule of law by deciding which land across the globe they believe should be sequestered as a “World Heritage Site”.  Who gave them the authority?   They gave it to themselves.

In fact, within the guides of their original NGO creation, they sought to eradicate illiteracy.   Somehow, they extended their hand and have submerged themselves in arena’s quite different…

Apparently, the UN, under the guise of UNESCO, has been busily confiscating large swathes of land and historical sites across the globe for the all encompassing reason – environmental sustainability.  In this grab, control over valuable land in Sudan, South Africa, Ukraine, Russia, Syria, and other areas that provide abundant resources, in particular, “Water” are of high importance to them.  Designating themselves as a World governance, they have amassed control over The lifeblood of all existence – Water.   As such they can determine who gets the water –A power grab like none other!

UNESCO has the power to determine US measures, costs, bills and budgets for such things as these Land Grabs.   They can source the best land.   They can provide the most complete agenda for meeting the ‘needs’ of the opposing government.  And in the end, these Executive Board officials that reign from Europe, the Middle East, Africa and South America can determine what land in the US should be deemed ‘protected’ and assert themselves as the global protector of such places as Monticello, Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, and even the Statue of Liberty.

The last time the US sat on the Board was 2012-2015.   So we effectively have absolutely no say whatsoever in the decision of what sites, land, and water within the US will now come under the control and auspices of UNESCO.  NONE. 

UNESCO Director-General is Audrey Azoulay, a Moroccan Jew who supports Palestine and Socialism.  In other words – a Communist who has visions of grandeur.

In the 1970’s and 1980’s the New World Information and Communication Order was created under UNESCO as established by the McBride Commission.  The purpose was to create a “One World Voice” to make the media more ‘equitable and balanced’.  All information would be contained in one media opinion.  In response, the US and UK dropped out of UNESCO.  In 2003, the US rejoined.

UNESCO has also ingratiated itself in the Israeli conflict, routinely condemning Israel in favor of Palestine.   In 2010, UNESCO claimed that their interference in the designation of Holy sites by Israel was within their jurisdiction given their mission is to support scientific and cultural cooperation throughout the world.  Who gave them such governance?  They gave it to themselves.

They are self promoting. They are an NGO.  They are not a governance.  Yet they hold themselves out as such and use that voice to institute world decisions – NOT voted on by The People.

UNESCO has hailed Che Guevara as a hero.  Insulted Japan in calling for the Nanjing Massacre to be part of their Memory of the World Register.  Their achievements are difficult to assess given that they have extended themselves far beyond their Protocol of governance, and because, like the UN, most of their ‘record’ involves phrases like;  ‘we held a convention…’, or ‘we helped train…’ or ‘we assisted in the decision making process…’ – all vague nondescript self laudings that could mean absolutely nothing.  Of course it goes without saying that the UN has one of the most generous compensation packages that may include a pension, housing, meals, a car, and basically everything a family would need in order to never actually spend a dime.  So keeping the funds flowing is essential to their lucrative power.

As such, Trump has announced that the US will no longer fund UNESCO and once again we will be redistributing those monies to US causes, US people, and US companies.   The US pays 22% of their annual budget.

Germany: The Axis of Deception

The Soros Open Society Foundation/Institute is moving its employees from Hungary to Germany with the glowing assistance and lauding of Angela Merkel.  Hungary’s government has instituted even tighter controls over the organization causing its power to wane and its teachings to be criticized. Germany’s Merkel is much more open arms to the Soros Protocol, especially given that it would appear the intention is to make Germany a central and global power.

Thus giving Merkel – Queendom.

As the UK flounders within the propaganda of chaos, and France is similarly mired in discontent and division, Germany is being propped up as the core center for a global New World.   And Merkel has gone from being Soros’ punching bag, to Soros last vestige.  She is, what Hillary felt entitled to be, a universal Queen.

Her government sponsored, Soros funded, media giant, Deutsche Welle, routinely promotes the Agenda of Liberalism within the context of demonizing anything right as being aligned with “Neo-Nazism”.   Given it’s international audience, and the German government censorship of alternative media, the propaganda feed promotes an ideology conducive to the Soros Protocol.

According to the Deutsche Welle, this is how they define Soros: “What is the OSF? The foundation supports and funds democracy and civil society initiatives in more than 100 countries worldwide. Soros is the founder and chair and has donated more than $32 billion (€27 billion) to the organization.”

Viktor Orban, the President of Hungary, has made eliminating Soros and his mercenaries, a mission.  From blacklisting organizations that support the foundation in Hungary, to political journalists who favor him, to educators at the Soros Academy in Budapest, Orban aims to euthanize the Open Society structure that took hold of his country.

Some of these organizations are directly linked to the UN including;  Hungarian Helskinki Committee.  Other NGO’s bill themselves out as “watchdogs”, they claim to be the human rights police, free speech police, and free choice police for the world.   The maze of connections is so vast any longer a computer algorithm would be required to create a networked link.

One such organization actually trains the executives of other NGO’s to become better Watchdog police, such as PIlnet whose website states:  “Civil society is often referred to as the “third sector” because it serves to give voice to those outside of the governmental and for-profit sectors. PILnet works to amplify this voice and strengthen the ability of civil society to influence laws and policies.”

PILnet’s Board of Directors lists:  EMIRITUS Member – Open Society Foundation, Aryeh Neler. He has served as President of the Open Society Institute, founded Students For A Democratic Society, co-founded Human Rights Watch and was Director for American Civil Liberties Union. He supported National Socialist Party of America – billed as Neo Nazi.  He writes articles that reflect the Open Society stance on immigration, highly applauding Merkel and Sweden while comparing their attitudes to those of the UK during WWII when he became a Jewish refugee from Berlin.

In 2013, he wrote positively about Amnesty International’s advocacy of decriminalizing prostitution.

But Orban’s denouncement of everything Soros has consequences.  With the jabbing of Soros, Merkel warns Hungary of financial consequences, Merkel warns Hungary of human rights violations, Merkel warns Hungary of immigration prerequisites, Merkel warns Hungary of Democracy perversions, Merkel has become the vocal critique at the bidding of Soros.

Recently, Hungary summoned the Swedish Ambassador for making disparaging remarks about Hungary’s immigration stance.  A rather odd statement given that Sweden is now mired in arsons, sexual assaults, assaults, and waves of criminal activity revolving around unprecedented immigrant ‘dissatisfaction’.  Sweden, the Pharisee, is chastising Orban for wanting to keep his country safe.  In Sweden a woman is 25 times more likely to be raped than Hungary, and a person is 7 times more likely to be assaulted.

In Germany sexual assaults have risen exponentially and the government has radically pushed for the authorities to pretend it isn’t an issue.  Only 10% of sexual assaults are even reported and a scathing 8% of those are prosecuted.  In the US it is estimated that 16% of rapes are reported and 25% are prosecuted.  Roughly 30% of rapes occur in the US prisons.

Statistics cannot always be analyzed at face value.

For Germany to rise as a foremost global power, it must promote itself economically while censoring itself socially.  Both BREXIT and the fall of France factor in its ability to become the Hummer of Europe.  Oddly, it’s embrace of both Turkey and now Iran fit rather oddly in the Biblical reference of the true axis…  of deception.

Merkel: Indoctrinate the Youth!

Chemnitz, Germany:   “…after a week of far-right protests. Family Minister Franziska Giffey arrived to speak to civil society representatives about the need for better political education.”  ~Courtesy Dw.com.

What is wrong with this?

  1.   In Germany, a Family Minister is appointed to determine how a family should raise their children.
  2.  “Better Political Education” – means teaching the youth one thought process, because they obviously don’t have one that aligns with the Family Minister, aka, Merkel.

Last weekend, a German man was fatally stabbed at a festival by two men, one an Iraqi, the other a Syrian.  Others were injured.   But the media is up in arms because the ethnicity of the two doing the stabbing was revealed and thus sparked protests that have ignited the need for the Family Minister to intervene and suggest that all schools now be required to offer political education correctness as a part of their curriculum…

It is worthy to note that the victims were in their thirties and the perpetrators in their twenties…

The aim of the Family Ministry is to “introduce programs in schools where children learn to practice democratic processes.” 

Given that most of the 2 million refugees Merkel ushered into Germany are beyond school age, this measure aims to indoctrinate the young while continuing the scathing white-washing of the crimes committed by the refugees against the German people.

Of course, these and other suggestions were brought by select groups, like trade unions, who feel that Neo Nazi’s are really the problem and the ‘alt-right’ needs to back off and act more respectable. The idea is that if children are programmed to accept violent deaths by immigrants, then there won’t be any problem because everyone will just be tolerant and happy!

According to a ‘study commissioned by the Merkel government last year, the reason that Chemnitz and Saxony lean toward a right way of thinking is simply a holdover of their communist background… when the Soviet Union ruled, between 1949 and 1990.  While today’s venues refer to it as a ‘socialist period’, it was most definitely Communist in reality.

Given that Merkel was raised a communist and participated in the Communist Party wouldn’t that mean she leans toward the alt right – according to her own study?  Perhaps the study forgot that piece of information.

Apparently, the ‘study’ went further to suggest that these eastern Germans have an ‘exaggerated need for harmony, order and purity’  all of which provoke nationalized and ideological thinking which must be expunged at all costs so that chaos and immorality and collective thinking can take over.

Overall, Saxony has a problem – according to the study, because they are not in their left mind…

Interestingly, it would appear that it is Merkel who is pushing Germany further and further into a Communist rule of order wherein the state dictates everything, and the people are peasants to be led like cows.

In order to combat this orderly alt right thinking, Merkel, albeit thru her crystal family planner, has decided that curriculum for children must be inclusive of political framing so that everyone will vote accordingly.  Oddly,the fact that the Iraqi and Syrian were never a part of the German school system given they were asylum seekers, somehow alludes Merke.  And somehow, the victims are not the issue, the issue is that the German people of Saxony refused to ‘accept it’ and protested.

Instead of the media concern for the stabbing, they have reinvented the events to investigate the ‘hooligans who gave the Hitler salute at the protests’…  because that bears more scrutiny.

Simultaneously, Sweden is attempting to quash reports of yet another fire involving some 10 vehicles, set by immigrants, despite the Swedish government vowing to take action after last week’s 80 vehicle fire… er, by disenfranchised Muslim immigrants… who continue to run the streets within a vein of chaos reminiscent of Mad Maxx.

Of course, the real problem is that the citizens just aren’t thinking right about the assaults, rapes, destruction, burglaries, and extant criminal activity.  The citizens need to settle down and accept the fact that sweet little Sweden is now slated to become a third world country within the next 2 to 3 years – according to the UN.

The solution is to numb those affected rather than stop those perpetrating the crimes…  Interesting logic.  But isn’t that rather parallel to the policies within the Obama Administration, aka Swamp?  Minority rules?   Change the entire structure of a classroom to accommodate the one student who is miffed about the rankings of the other 39.

The re-Communism of Germany is taking form and shape, at the behest of Merkel and her subordinates, at the whims of her Masters, Soros and Rothschild.  Again, the question rises, why?  Why would she sell out her country?  IS it her Communist upbringing that fuels her loyalty?

It is interesting to remember that Soros described his time as a young Nazi collaborator as his most enjoyable in life –   His father sold him to the Nazi’s in order to protect him from Auschwitz and death because Soros was an Ashkenazi Jew.   Could Merkel consider her Communist regime time as her happiest as well? Is this the ultimate link between them?

While Soros was sold to the Nazi’s at the ripe age of 13, Merkel was brought up a Communist from the beginning.  Could this be the ‘education propaganda’ that they both envision as the greatest gift?

As Germany grapples with attempting in integrate it’s refugee’s, and re-educate them along with their own citizens, according to their version and vision of propaganda politics, their lead is most definitely at risk of spiraling all of Europe down the Rabbit Hole where insanity reigns, and where there is no more Light – at all.

Wake up…  Alice is still asleep beneath the tree…

Juvenile Justice System…?

 

Lately I have been challenged on my belief with respect to children being charged in the justice system as adults.  I am against it.   I find it wrong on every level.  

We have decided that if a child acts in a wrongful manner, they are acting with the mental capacity of a mature adult.  And yet, if a child acts in a mature, compassionate and logical manner, they are still – a child.

We have decided that if a child acts in a wrongful manner, they are acting with the mental capacity of a mature adult. And yet, if a child acts in a mature, compassionate, and logical manner, they are still – a child.

What is wrong with this thinking?

A child of fifteen did some horrendous things, someone was hurt, property was damaged, and because this teen-age child acted in a manner befitting an adult, as in with malice, hate, and destruction, that child must be convicted as an adult – no matter the circumstance, the variables, that led this ‘child’ to be so criminal.

Lines have to be drawn to be sure. But who makes the lines? Each one is unique? Each one is predicated on circumstances. And yet, we have somehow usurped the norms of justice, and replaced them with boxes.

If you did this, then no matter who or what you are – you will be so convicted – even if it means taking a child – and suddenly stating they are an adult.

Does that mean that what defines an adult is all their sin and perversity?

Therefore, anyone who commits an evil act, is an adult, and will be punished as such.
But what if, the child was abused? Abandoned? Assaulted? Bullied? Sexually Abused? The possible reality list is endless in today’s day and age, and yet, our justice system fails to acknowledge that endlessness. Instead, the abused, assaulted, and abandoned child is expected to live according to rules of adulthood.

A fifteen year old in jail. Will that rehabilitate her? Will it change her? Will it make her believe in the system? Will it make her side with the authorities – or the victims? Recidivism in our penal system still hovers near the 70% mark.

How will she change?

To acknowledge aspects of the dialogue, I agree there are circumstances beyond our control, genetic shifts, an exposure to a toxin, etc… but given the waywardness of our youth today, I doubt their issues are derived from toxins and more likely false dialogue that sways their thinking.

And yet I can watch as a young girl is subjected to such a devious place – jail, and so many would support, “She deserves it…”

Consider if the IRS, the Military, the Government, Liquor Stores, School, Airlines, Insurance Companies, all followed the same criteria and allowed a fifteen year old to partake within their industries because they felt she/he was acting in an adult fashion and therefore deserving of their wares?

I believe that if you have a rule, and the rule says you are not an adult until the age of 18 – or 21 – then that’s what it is. Period.

I believe that every child – teen-ager – deserves a chance over and over – until they become an adult, and as an adult either get it right – or wrong. In the meantime, we as ‘adults’ have a duty to act – like – adults and tend to the needs of children, teaching them values of respect, honor, compassion, and virtue. When w we look fat the rants and attitudes we see across the media as they portray the youth today, you have to consider ‘who they are modeling’…

Germany: FREE Child Care Will Cost 3 Billion Euro

Germany has a daycare problem, it has been made hugely worse by the importation of millions of immigrants who by law may use the municipal daycare facilities, for free given they have no income.   However, there are simply nowhere near enough facilities to accommodate the German children, much less the multitudes of added immigrants.   Merkel’s solution?  Make it all free, then everyone will be guaranteed a spot! Yeah!  Sounds good for the media!   So what’s the problem?  There are NO SPOTS!   Stories abound of German workers who take advantage of the extended leave made available by law, put their children on a waiting list, only to find there still is no available slot after their 14 months leave has run out.

Making daycare free will only exasperate the problem!   Subsidies already cover a hefty percentage of the costs at roughly 225 euros per month. Until recently, this subsidy was provided to parents that chose to keep their children home, out of daycare, but this law was over-turned when a group of activists protested that it encouraged moms to stay at home – a taboo in Germany.

Because in Germany, it is much more preferable to have the state bring up your children for you… And they can’t understand why their birth rate is the lowest in all of Europe.  Odd.

Refugees and immigrants are given priority for daycare slots because the government feels this is the only way to assure the children will learn German…   Thus, Germans are relegated to hiring nannies and au-pairs at a significantly higher cost.

Essentially, when Merkel announced free daycare for everyone, she was really addressing all the immigrants who have yet to take advantage of the welfare benefit.   The potential domino effect of these policies is Germans will lose their employment because they can’t find daycare, can’t find an au pair or nanny, or can’t afford the private costs.

In 2011, Merkel announced that all children over three have the ‘legal right’ to daycare.   In 2013, all children over the age of 12 months were granted this ‘legal right’.  But the terminology is useless if there isn’t an available facility.   In fact, it was estimated that in order to accommodate this right by 2013, Germany would have needed to ADD 140,000 new facilities!  Never made it even close, the infrastructure was not available and the cost topped well over $3 billion.

The solution?

In 2017, a judge determined that parents who are unable to find a government sponsored facility may sue the government for lost wages!   Merkel?

While state sponsored German media outlets applaud the low cost grand scheme of daycare in Germany, the reality is starkly different:

  1. shortage of workers, in Germany they are called ‘childminders’ for family care, means importing them from other countries…
  2. shortage of facilities meant that many communities simply used PODS, or warehouses without any play areas, small spaces, crowded spaces, and inadequate supplies.
  3. parents have taken to bribing managers given the wait list can be exorbitantly long, 5 or more years in more urban areas like Munich and Heidelberg.
  4. a study commissioned by the Federal Families Ministry of Germany, found that only 3% of the facilities were considered of ‘good’ quality.  None apparently made it higher.
  5. there is no standard curriculum and politicians don’t want to require one given this could increase already burgeoning costs.

The cost to the government in providing subsidies and promoting families has been running  $270 billion per year.   Part of the reasoning for the initiative was a result of the ever declining birth rate – which was the major reasoning behind bringing in the immigrants.  Germany needs children and immigrants to fill the cost of supporting an ever aging population, because the German birth rate continues to decline.  So the government decided that the reason adults in Germany were not procreating was because they wanted more state sponsored welfare programs to raise their children for them.

What will Merkel’s new freebie contribute?

Higher taxes given Germany is already grappling with the requirement that it boost it’s military spending to be in compliance with EU regulations, nothing is “Free”.  Higher childcare costs as demand can not match availability, and expatriation as couples search to fill their needs.

Cost of Child Care in Germany:

State run facility – $400 Euro per month average

Private facility – $500 to $900 per month average

Au Pair – 4 weeks paid vacation, 30 hour work week, sick days, public holidays, paid travel, secure room, board and a monthly stipend starting at roughly 450 euros.

Nanny – typically charge 2,000 to 2,500 Euro a month

Migrant Children – Don’t Want To Go Home!

Once again the perspective of the German government media icon, Deutsche Weil, seems somewhat perplexing as they attempt to provide a psychological analysis of migrant children being reunited with parents on the US border.  Apparently, the problem is the fact that many children aren’t too keen about the reunion, and DW would have us believe it is because they have been traumatized as a result of the separation.

Really?

Children don’t want to hug their mothers and fathers, they don’t smile or run and jump into their arms with happiness and glee. Instead they are sullen, distant, and scowling…  Odd.  Or maybe not so odd.

According to Dr. Elizabeth Barnert of UCLA, she warns that children will be angry, feel abandoned, and have life long health problems as a direct result of the US migrant separation policy.  So why isn’t this the case when veterans are deployed overseas and can be away from their children for a year or even more?  Why is it that time and again the veterans are greeted by their children with huge hugs and tears and kisses?   What could possibly be different?

Could it be because their fathers were beating them?  Could it be because they were abused?   Could it be because the sexual abuse they have endured in their homes has left a lifetime of scars?   Could it be because their life in the shelters was actually much more wholesome than the life they will return to?

Years ago when I lived in California, I came to know an immigrant family from Mexico.   Each year they legally submitted an application and paid the fee to have one of their children come to the US.   One child per year.   I remember Anna telling me how hard it was because all the children were being sexually abused by their uncle.  And yet, there was nothing they could do.   It was tortuous.

Could it be that these sad immigrant children reunited with their parents are not showing joy because this is the life we are returning them to at the behest of our outraged Hollywooders and politicians?

DW also cites Dr. Shonkoff who specializes in researching child development from a scientific viewpoint at Harvard.   Oddly, he too is making an analysis without actually interviewing any of the migrant children.   In fact, the basis of his theory could be more impactful in analyzing the development of children who are raised by nannies, day cares and public schools systems instead of by their parents.   The feelings of abandonment and neglect that institutionalizing children creates.  Or perhaps his research could apply to the roughly 150,000 orphans in the US…  But instead, somehow the millions are neglected in order to make a a statement about a few hundred.  Why?

So why would these two esteemed doctors make subjective statements regarding the psychological and health implications about a few immigrant children without conducting any interviews, specific research, or analysis of the life they are returning to? Why would they condemn the possible value that the shelter offered, as a ‘shelter’ from harm?

The cued media response is ‘irreparable harm, brain damage, obesity, and even – cancer!!  WOW!   What about the hundreds of thousands of children that are sent to the US unaccompanied – by their parents?  Hush!

The misplaced outrage is obtusely – misplaced.

Hundreds of migrant children will be traumatized, adversely affected, and Trump is the ultimate target of blame…  But what about the 2.7 million children who have a parent in prison?   Are they victims of brain damage and cancer?  How about the ‘ever increasing’ number of children in foster care now numbering roughly 450,000!   Where is the media outrage?  Where is Hollywood?

In 2008, a NY judge broke with tradition and granted asylum to three Honduran children who were being sexually abused by their relatives in Honduras.  Did any of these esteemed doctors who gave their name to the media as a reference against Trump’s policy research what these children were being sent back to?   Or maybe that reality didn’t fit the anti agenda…

Could it be that these ‘dogooders’ are oblivious to the abuse?   I doubt it.

In 2009, a report was issued that highlighted the fact that child sex abuse is at epidemic levels in Honduras and that statistics place it as one of the highest in the world!  Still it is below El Salvador…  Oh that’s right, many of the migrant children we are sending back home come from El Salvador too.

In 2006, UNICEF issued a scathing report in which it claimed that 40 million children younger than 15 were victims of violence, abuse and neglect in Latin America and the Caribbean alone!   And most of the violence takes place in the HOME.

HUSH.

Maybe that’s why these children aren’t looking too happy when they are reunited with their fathers, uncles and family…  This is what they are returning to as a result of the media, the outraged Liberals, and the Hollywood elite who throw pennies on the problem all the while derailing Trump.   Where are the politicians now who sought to see their name in print, the face plastered on papers as a guardian for youth?   Because it would appear by all accounts that what has been accomplished is to return these children to a living hell.

Are they protecting the children – or are they putting them to – a living death?  Were the Shelters the only safety they have ever known…