There are no original manuscripts identifying Plato, Aristotle, Hesiod or Homer. They were all created between the 10th century AD and the 15th and 16th centuries AD. Mostly ascribed to Bishops within the Pope’s circle. The claim is that the original manuscripts simply didn’t survive, papyrus torn, ink faded, lost at sea, etc… Meaning the later transcriptions were ‘modern creative writing’. Why would The Church take on this task?
The time period associated with the advent of these manuscripts was labeled The Renaissance Period. It was a period wherein philosophy became distinguished and writings from the 6th and 7th BC era were the basis of thought. But that ‘thought’ was created by The Church. The writings don’t exist. As historians go, Plato lived sometime between 700 and 300 BC. Plato’s ‘Republic’ is considered the basis of philosophical thought authored sometime between 700 and 300 BC. However, the oldest and only surviving manuscript of Plato was created sometime around 1095 AD by Bishop Pagan of Caesarea, the first Chancellor of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. During The First Crusade. Over the centuries, the manuscripts of Aristotle and Plato were created based on ‘an idea’. Did any of these philosophers actually exist?
The purpose of The Enlightenment was to move people away from religion. Immanuel Kant, synthesized rationalism as empirical thought for modern men who did not adhere to fables and stories associated with the Bible. His largest influencer was Aristotle – who likely did not exist but was created by The Church to which Kant reviled. Because of Kant’s anti-theoretical stance of reason beyond myth, he became an oracle to his followers. A demi-god.
What we are taught:
“The impact of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle on subsequent philosophical and political thought is both profound and far-reaching. Each, in their own way, laid down foundational concepts and methods that have continued to resonate through the ages, influencing thinkers, leaders, and the general course of human history.”
The rise of the concept of philosophical reason vs religion came about with the Fall of the Roman Empire. The same Roman Empire that claims its first Emperor to be the mythological character Romulus – whose father was the god of war – Mars. Romulus was raised by a woodpecker and a wolf. Why is it that no historians have disputed this historical account?
The story of Romulus and Remus was supposedly created by Ovid in an epic Latin poem written sometime from the early 1st century AD, which contains a complete account of the twins’ (Romulus and Remus) tale. However, none of Ovid’s manuscripts survived. “We don’t have Ovid’s original manuscript — we have only much later medieval copies of copies of copies. These texts were copied by hand, and in each new copy new errors were inevitably introduced. Over time these errors compounded, and as a result, no single manuscript preserves what Ovid actually wrote.”
Meaning, we don’t really know if Ovid ever existed, any more than Aristotle, Homer, or Romulus.
Metamorpheses; by Ovid: “The poem chronicles the history of the world from its creation to the deification of Julius Caesar in a mythico-historical framework comprising over 250 myths, 15 books, and 11,995 lines.”
Essentially, our entire basis of history was created in the renaissance era of the 15th century and called – reality. What would be the point in manufacturing these Epic Fakes? To hide the truth. Who knows the truth? My guess would be the tunnels beneath the Vatican hold the accounts of Truth to which we may never be privy. The larger question would be; WHY do they want to withhold the Truth and feed us stories and lies?
When writing fiction, most writers call upon factual events and merge the fact with the fiction. I would surmise that the writers of the 15th century were no different in merging fiction within fact. Just as “science” practices the Art of Fiction with a few dollops of fact to keep it sanitized. The only way to keep us under a shroud of distraction is to tell the lies in our educational institutions. By it’s own volition, education is considered a factoid of knowledge. Who made that assertion?
The closest historical depiction of the first university was the University of Bologne, Italy. Although its history is an unknown – it is speculated it came about in 1088 AD. The university followed Canon and Roman Law as promulgated in the 6th century AD. It can be assumed that the university was a creation of the Catholic Pope – Pope Urban II. Urban was known for his call for the Crusades wherein all Christians were ordered to war against Muslims in order to claim The Holy Land – Jerusalem. The First Holy War.
Pope Urban II was born Ortho De Lagery – to a family of nobility. It was during this time frame that Pope Gregory VII was attempting to establish dominant power over King Henry IV so as to make Kings subservient to Popes. In response, King Henry installed a ‘puppet’ Pope Clement III – while the papacy installed Pope Urban.
Ultimately, with the assistance of the Knights Templar, the Papacy was able to take control over the Kings and rule above their power. The most successful of these Knights/Crusaders was Baldwin I who became King of Jerusalem. His coronation took place on Christmas Day at the Church of Nativity in Bethlehem. Baldwin’s entire time as a Crusader can be accounted as occurring during the period of ‘forever wars’. He was buried on Palm Sunday.
He obviously assumed himself within the role of Jesus Christ.
In summary, our entire history was manufactured by Church Bishops between the 15th and 16th centuries. The merger of mythology with bits of reality garnered the Church power over Nobles and Peasants. And nothing in history can truly be anything but an illusory Matrix.
