Pipe Bomb Scare or Scandal?

George Soros was the first recipient of the pipe bomb.  It was ‘hand delivered’ to his mailbox at his suburban home in Katonah New York.   The normal carrier for his mail was questioned and told the FBI he does not remember such a package.  Which means it was delivered by the creator, or someone hired by the creator.   And somehow, despite all the billions, Soros seems to not have a security system or camera at this property that would have videoed the delivery?

The package with a pipe bomb that the media claims was delivered to DeNiro was actually found ‘near a restaurant DeNiro co-owns’ with Sean Penn and Russell Simons.

Apparently, Biden felt left out of the sympathy fanfare and notified the FBI that surely there was a bomb package for him – somewhere?  So dutifully, they found one sitting in a Delaware post office ready to be returned to sender.  Biden was overjoyed!  He was included after-all.

Eric Holder’s bomb was apparently returned to sender, Debbie Wasserman.

The bomb addressed to Brennan was actually sent to CNN, and had his name misspelled ‘Brenan’.

The one delivered to Hillary and Bill was intercepted during normal mail screening.

The one for Obama was ‘intercepted’ as well – security paid for by US Taxpayers.

Apparently, none of the bombs contained the necessary detonation ‘device’.  They were not meant to blow.   Most were hand delivered.  No cameras apparently caught any deliveries.   There were no notes.

Attached to the bombs was a black paper placard that depicted three erotic looking women painted in white at the top and the meme:  Get Er Gone.   The meme is a takeoff of a book title, “Git R Gone” and is considered Urban language for inspiring action.

According to the FBI, the stamps were licked and contain saliva DNA, and fingerprints were left on the receptacles.

The MSM New York Times issued a ranting attack against Trump for instigating violence while printing a picture and opinion piece in which Trump is assassinated.    Maxine Waters has routinely called for Trump’s death as has DeNiro.   Eric Holder called for actionable violence by all Democrats against all Conservatives.    Waters has also been quite verbal in instigating violence against people in public places that are supporters of Trump. Of course, her rally’s have been rather sparsely populated garnering perhaps 15 or so.

The irony of the NYT statement is lost on their fake news agenda.

But if the pipe bombs had no detonation device, the creator had no intention of hurting anyone, she/he was just sending a warning or colluding in an election sting.  While the spin is that the bombs target critics of Trump, that would indicate every Liberal is a potential target…  given they all criticize and assault Trump.  The spin is simply that – rhetoric.

These bizarre antics of blaming Trump for everything from hurricanes to serial killers, to pipe bombers is a form of mental instability labeled –   ‘fundamental attribution error’, and an attribute of narcissistic sociopathy.    It is a form of control, a need to control, a need to attack, an inability to take responsibility for anything, and a pathological need to lie.

The antics of Debbie Wasserman brought down the DNC.  She disgraced the party and was found by WikiLeaks to have orchestrated fraud within the DNC that may or may not have led to the brutal murder of staff member, Seth Rich.  Refusing to resign, Obama forced her resignation.  She became the most prominent scapegoat.

As such, her name as the sender of the pipe bombs was quite intentional.

But the obvious intent of labeling Trump a disgrace because of his attacks on ‘the media’ is rather an odd rant given the media was not a target, the bomb sent to CNN was addressed to Brennan…Somehow the media thinks they are the target?

Wasserman is a candidate for Florida-23 a mostly democrat district within Broward County.  Broward County is home to student turned national Liberal activist David Hogg.   Today, the FBI stated they are concentrating their efforts on South Florida as they pinpoint the source of the pipe bombs.   It could be interesting…  might explain the crude construction, the wrong addresses, the misspellings…not to mention the fact they were not built to actually detonate.

Illegal Immigrant Crisis – Global Chaos

Dutch authorities have admitted massive fraud in the refugee benefit program wherein Turkish citizens with homes in Turkey are using fake ID’s to claim benefits in The Netherlands and Germany.  According to Dutch authorities upwards of 17million Euros have vanished and perhaps as many as 12,000 Turks and migrants are capitalizing on the fraudulent scam.  

In fact, the Turkish town of Rashdiye is home to 700 Turks, all of whom claim and are supported by German welfare.   This is their ‘wage’, it provides for all their needs including a home, food, and even televisions.  According to one such resident, his children work and own multiple hotels, but this is free money.  German authorities are aware, but choose to ignore the situation because it would be bad press coverage and stoke more animosity toward the migrants.

Last year, when an employee of Germany’s state reception authority discovered that a large number of migrants were collecting multiple benefits using different names, sometimes as many as six, and reported the fraud, she was fired.   Her boss told her to bury the files in the basement where they wouldn’t be found, leave it alone, and most importantly, keep quiet.  She refused.

Still, nothing changed, no one is denied benefits.  It might appear racist or discriminatory, or their fragile demeanor might be offended…

The Dutch authorities state that the fraud is most likely widespread throughout the EU with Turks, Syrians, Afghani’s, and Lebanese playing the game.  And they have an unlikely assist to help them in these schemes – medical doctors.   In both Germany and France, medical doctors sometimes provide fake medical certificates for immigrants who have no ID in order to prevent deportation.   They then use these fake documents to obtain welfare benefits including ‘retroactive benefits’.

The cost of illegal immigration is difficult to tally, because it involves services not typically transparent such as;  deportation costs, travel costs, medical costs, fraud costs, housing and welfare costs, childcare costs, border costs, security costs, and societal costs.

According to the Heritage Foundation, as of 2013, the cost to the US was roughly $55 billion per year for ‘illegal immigrants’.   According to FAIR, Federation For American Immigration Reform, the annual ‘NET’ cost is now $116 billion per year on a federal, state and local level.

The confusing issue that seems to somehow allude the MSM, is attempting to classify illegal vs legal immigration.   No one is opposed to immigration, it is the illegal portion that is at issue.  If Governor Jerry Brown wants to personally go to Honduras and grant California documents to a bunch of Hondurans and personally fly them back to San Francisco, then more power to him.  If George Clooney wants to house illegals at his home in Lake Cuomo Italy and have Amal get them legal citizenship while providing an annual stipend to keep them off welfare, more power to him.

But this constant defense of illegal activity is simply nonsense.

Germany has estimated a cost of $86 billion over four years to support their immigrants and plan to pay for it out of their surplus budget…   Unfortunately, they are also attempting to spend their surplus on the creation of a new military given the US demand for them to be in compliance with the 2% requirement, and they are spending their surplus on debt repayment so that they can be in compliance with the EU Commission requirement of no more than 60%.   Some economists argue that Germany’s surplus comes at a detriment for other EU countries whose markets are squeezed because of Germany’s low import strategy which, despite Merkel’s rhetoric, is a nationalist strategy.   Germany is actually on par with China, hypocritically claiming a global alliance effort, while supporting a nationalist economic Germany.   Greece and Italy suffer in particular.   But Germany’s imports are falling, its trade economy is faltering, and its ability to pay for all these welfare immigration costs is less likely.

Germany is also battling their policy of uniting unaccompanied immigrant minors with their extended families.  The same policies that the US battles.    It also follows that many immigrants claiming to be minors are actually considerably older, and thus not entitled to the unification.  In 2015, 95,000 unaccompanied minors applied for asylum, in 2016 it was 63,200, and in 2017 31,000 – 90% of which are males.    How many family members were they entitled to bring to Germany?

Without documentation, these Afghani’s and Eritreans that overwhelm the system claim they are under the age of 18 and therefore entitled by German law.  Backing off, Merkel has ordered her government to deny the reunification and is ordering Medical testing  to determine their true age.

With the radical islamafication movement within the EU, France is now facing the ultimate truism as they predict that many mayoral candidates in the 2022 cycle will be Salafi Muslims as entire districts and towns are majority Islam.

Arguments still abound regarding the net surplus these immigrants bring…  Arguing that tax revenues are increased as a result, the NET deficit in France was still $22 billion in 2009 and the argument is terribly poor because it does not consider the true ‘COSTS’!

Illegal immigrants in a district north of Paris now account for 20% of the population.   But it is illegal in France to identify a person by their status – so true numbers are virtually impossible to tabulate.   This same District has a 50% unemployment rate and the locals there blame France…for their predicament.

Macron’s solution?

Process them faster so they are no longer illegal.  As for the unemployment – education and language remain the deterrents.

It is interesting to read articles from four or five years ago wherein the immigration issue was a nonissue and the governments and respective media outlets were encouraging more and more, faster and faster, only to read articles today wherein the same governments, the same media outlets, decry the folly and are quick to label blame.

It is reminiscent of the Clinton and Obama reproach today of Trump’s anti policies only to find articles and videos in which they said the same thing against the illegal flux 3 – 5 – and even 10 years ago.  Odd those videos don’t seem to make it to the unbiased MSM?

It is why we need to claim history vehemently –  because it remains evidence.

Facebook Censorship – An Anti-Trust Resolution?

The media that fought valiantly to indignantly assert their claim that they are NOT BIASED, don’t even try to pretend any longer.  The front page of the New York Times has over 20 articles that are anti-conservative defaming.  There is not one attempt at middle ground.  It is as though they have pulled their thumb from the dike that was always the New York Times and vomit hate within the flood of torrent waters.  Most, if not all of the headlines are false, they aren’t news, they aren’t imbedded in facts, they are ‘opinion’ disguised in the new media veil of undisclosed source or anonymous. 

Of course the other media outlets that cry foul when called out as Liberal biased, including the Washington Post and CNN, have also let loose the pretense and opened a floodgate of demonizing and hate.

Even their stock reports were oddly seemingly biased.   In a story about Caterpillar stock, CNN provided a gloomy and negative picture all aligned within a Trumpism causation.  However, The Wall Street Journal had a completely different perspective with glowing support.  FYI; Caterpillar grew year over year by 24%, it’s earnings beat estimates, and its sales continue to exceed expectations ramping up 23%.  Profit taking dropped the stock.  It did not issue any warnings as The Washington Post is stating.

Ellen Degenres producer has openly, without filter, attacked Melania in every way possible, from her appearance, her style, her behavior, her actions, to her ethnicity.  All within the guise of ‘tolerance and kindness’.    Apparently, female power only applies to Liberal females.

The Washington Post has also lifted any pretense it may have proclaimed, and dry heaves the most egregious bias of opinion and hatred toward anyone who dares support Trump.

Ads are being pumped across these venues by Facebook as it proclaims it is working diligently to expel all the fake media outlets that might assert an opinion in contrast to the Liberal agenda.   While claiming to use AI to shred the conservative/fake accounts, Facebook fails to acknowledge that AI is a program by definition.  And programs are created by humans.  And those humans are employed by Facebook.

Last January Julian Assange of WikiLeaks warned about the massive ramping up of Facebook, Google and their Chinese counterparts to censor information:

“Burgeoning digital super states such as Facebook, Google and their Chinese equivalents who are integrated with the existing order, have moved to re-establish discourse control. This is not simply a corrective action. Undetectable mass social influence powered by artificial intelligence is an existential threat to humanity.”

AI harvests what it is told to harvest, expunges what it is told to expunge, and eliminates what it is told to eliminate.   It is an algorithm not independent.  It’s information is the result of its program analytics.  And yet, Facebook would have the world believe that because it is AI, somehow it is unbiased…

Even that is fake news.

Zuckerberg continually makes news as “institutional shareholders” of Facebook stock want him removed from the Board of Directors.  It would thus appear, that his sellout to the globalists hasn’t panned exactly as planned.  And they want more.  Institutional Ownership constitutes roughly 60% of the shares with Chevy Chase Holding and Strs Ohio leading the pack.     But it is Trillium Wealth Management that has openly made the call.  Its CEO, Matthew William Patsky, was a Hillary Victory donor.

Could it be that Hillary blames Zuckerberg for her Presidential loss, and he will simply become the latest hit list victim despite desperate attempts to completely censor Facebook?

“If you look at Facebook, the vast majority of the news items posted were fake,” she asserted. “They were connected to, as we now know, the 1,000 Russian agents who were involved in delivering those messages …”

But Zuckerberg’s fate may be a result of too little too late as far as Hillary is concerned.  Despite being warned by Soros funded Media Matters that censorship of conservative news was paramount before the 2016 election, Zuckerberg dragged his feet and didn’t initiate the purge until Trump was elected.  That put him in the wiles of Hillary – and the call for his ousting is rather non-coincidental.

The need to completely obliterate conservative media is the goal.  And as Assange warned, it may be too vast already to obliterate….  But Trump has asked for an investigation into whether Facebook, Google and Twitter have engaged in anti-trust violations regarding ‘fair competition’.   While Zuckerberg claims the censorship is Russia related, he also admitted in testimony that the alleged Russia interference was so marginally small as to have no impact.  In so doing, he has set himself up as a potential target by this admission given that the hits and expulsions are predominantly conservative and thus he is engaging in anti-trust behavior.  In addition, Facebook has been called out for age bias when posting job ads for various companies.  In that frame, Facebook applies an algorithm in which only millennials ‘see’ the ad, a blatant discrimination violation.

While claiming that AI is making the determinations, he is basically asserting that AI is an independent entity out of the control of Facebook.

An interesting defense, but one that has no basis – hence ousting Zuckerberg would thus be Facebook’s purge as they make him the root and cause of all their problems.  The scapegoat.  With a Supreme Court aligned with Trump – such a charge could have a more fair judicial decision.

Other media outlets may find themselves facing similar charges.

Wikipedia: A Facebook/Google Protege

Sometime ago I got hooked on the phrase “Follow The Money”.  It has proven to be even more than I could possibly imagine.  And today was proof again.

I was reading that Breitbart has been delisted from Wikipedia as a source, and they are further considering blacklisting.  And while Wikipedia has a history of controversies, including the fact that most schools prohibit Wikipedia from being used as a citation, they seem to have jumped onto the Facebook – Google Bandwagon, and their Liberal bias is just as perverse, if not more so!

Wikipedia is actually owned by Wikimedia Foundation which is governed by a Board and has as it’s current Executive Director, Katherine Maher.  Her bio states that she worked for the National Democratic Institute, an NGO whose Chair is Madeleine Albright, a Trilateral confederate, and whose source of funding includes the US Department of State, as well as the governments of Australia, Denmark and Belgium.   The Board Chair of the Foundation, Christophe Henner, has no Wikimedia profile at all – a rather bizarre oddity.

In case that doesn’t hit a home run, that means, a US NGO that is pro- Clinton, Soros, and everything Liberal is funded by ALL US taxpayers as well as governments from very Liberal/Socialist countries…  The irony being that Republicans are funding Liberal NGO’s!  I’m sure they find this very humorous…

Ahhh, but it gets better.

In 2015, Wikipedia attempted to launch “Knowledge Engine” which aimed to created a loop of sorts that would take internet searches back to them no matter the content or the Google search wording.  The funding for this cryptic engine was the Knight Foundation.  In line with numerous media outlets; NBC, ABC, NYT, and WAPO, The James L. Knight Foundation also backs the Investigative News Network, INN, which is funded by Soros Open Society Foundation, and is possibly the most-well-known journalism foundation. Knight President and CEO, Alberto Ibargüen, is on the board of directors for ProPublica.

Pro-Publica is affiliated with The New York Times and gets it’s funding from; Open Society Foundation, Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Ford Foundation Pew Charitable Trusts, The Carnegie Corporation and the Atlantic Philanthropies.  We can assume – that all these foundations are interlinked within the Democrat Foundation, ie, The Swamp.

How deep does it go?

The founders of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, made their debut launching an ‘adult content’ erotica portal that Wales likened to Maxim magazine. Many of the Trustees and Board author content for Wikipedia under pseudonyms, many of which have German tenure and nearly all, if not all, would appear to be – Liberals.

What this reveals is a very intense demonstrative action to – rewrite history.  To eradicate all but one thought process.  And to dummy down, not just the US, but the world when it comes to people, events, and even – opinion.  Wikipedia has a huge presence in Germany, Australia, UK, Canada, India, etc… They crafted themselves as the purveyor of knowledge, the definer of history, and the opinion of mankind.

And now, they have chosen to defame sources that they deem do not align with their World Agenda.

The extent to which we have been manipulated only seems to grow exponentially with the unveilings.  We are all sources.  We were all duped.  We have all been manipulated at some point.  And yet, these people, these web communities, would seem to have absolutely no self examination or guilt.   Instead they would seem to take pride in the extent to which they can fool and demonize.  These people that Jimmy Wales surrounded himself with came from Google, JP Morgan, Semantic, Quora, the UN, etc…, with a very large presence coming from – Merkel’s, Germany.

The same Merkel who censors media and promotes the criminal offense of saying anything anti-Islam.

The bio’s of these affiliates of Wikimedia are typically referred to as so-and-so of the Wikimedia Movement.  “Our aim was to identify a common strategic direction that would unite and inspire people across our movement on our way to 2030, and help us make decisions.”

Each month on average, Wikipedia is viewed more than 15 billion times, and accessed by more than 1 billion unique devices.  More than 200,000 editors are volunteers.  German researchers rank Wikipedia high as a reliable source…  And this one is quite grand!  Researchers at Harvard, the same Harvard that has produced MOST of The Swamp, concluded that Wikipedia’s editors are critical reliable resources for verifiable topics and concerns…

Surprise!

Of course, this glowing tribute was written by a California lawyer within the law firm associated with the Milken Institute.  If you remember!  Michael Milken was convicted on felony charges for violating SEC laws, racketeering and his charitable giving.

Not exactly a stellar resume for lauding Wikipedia!  FOLLOW the Money, but also follow the Lineage.

At any rate – we can see from the Money Flow – where Wikipedia stands and why it is in line with the Liberal persuasion of Google and Facebook, why it utilizes it’s influence to create a burgeoning false agenda and how it specifically targets that design.

Buyer – Beware.

Liberal Universities – The Coup of Private Foundations

The money trail of funding within our most prestigious universities provides an outline of demonstrative control, manipulation, and agenda.  Foundations are the forefront of that agenda, and each foundation’s board of trustees controls the agenda.  “We will give you money if you incorporate this curriculum, this ideology, and this methodology into the school.”  Thus assuring that the end product, the mind and thought process of the graduates, is aligned within a particular mode.  It is the ultimate mind control.  And Taxpayers Fund it.

Harvard is a liberal elite university that embodies such an agenda.  The Center For Education Policy Research is an adjunct to Harvard that cites three pillars:   research, tools and talent, and networks for sharing.   Basically, if we Follow The Money, our educators and school boards are the tools subject to the puppet masters who tell them what to think, what to teach, and what to advocate.  Within this, the Universities churn out more pawns aligned in a single policy thought who will become the next new politician telling more pawns the follies of what has become an imaginary world.

Major funders and Trustees include: Bill Gates, Hewlett Foundation, Ford Foundation, Bloomberg, Hecksher Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Bank of America, IBM, Austria’s Jabobs Foundation, The Atlantic Philanthropies, and the Walton family Foundation are among a few of the many contributors.  Their causes typically include;  global warming, planned parenthood, open society, Obamacare, population control, open borders, and “education reform”.

A few notable Foundations would seem to skew from the typical agenda’s of social policy reform.   One such organization is the Smith Richardson Foundation which is focused on international security and foreign policy, monetary, fiscal and tax policy, and a ‘global political change’.   One of the Trustees is a Hollywood film producer, Bill Stetson III whose credits include active membership in the Creative coalition, an advocacy group for Hollywood Liberals.

A quick look at their Form 990 for 2015 indicates some notable recipients of their grants which average roughly 4% of their total value:

  1. Center For A New America Security; CEO = Victoria Newland.They boast that a number of their employees were hired on by the Obama Administration and their experts are routinely quoted by NYT, CNN, WAPO, NBC, NPR, Jon Stewart and more.  Notable speakers have included;  Hillary, Gen Martin Dempsey, Madelaine Albright and Gen Petraeus.  They advocate ‘neoliberalism’.
  2. Institute For The Study of War; President = Kimberly Kagan, whose brother-in-law is married to Victoria Nuland.She was an instrumental source for advocating the surge/war in Iraq and a restructuring military in Afghanistan.  She works closely with Gen. Petraeus.  Chairman of the Board includes retired Gen Jack Keane.
  3. Center For Strategic and International Studies; President = John Hamre who served as Secretary of Defense under Bill Clinton, and worked closely with Obama to develop US cyber warfare. Notable cross political party speakers include;  John McCain, Henry Kissinger, Sam Nunn, Hillary, and Leon Panetta.  Controversial funding sources have included the governments of the United Arab Emirates, Japan, Norway, Germany, and China.

While Harvard is by no means alone in this ‘gifting schematic’ that is more closely related to blackmail, they are the Creme Brulee.  Other notables include:   Brown University, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado College, Cornell, Columbus, Cambridge, George Washington, Georgetown, John Hopkins, Oxford, Sacred Heart University, Stanford, Syracuse, University of Calgary, University of North Caroline, Yale, Notre Dame, Universities of Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Southern California, South Florida, etc…

The “education” curriculum is created to advance the ‘non-partisan’ thinking of these various non-profits whose Liberal and Progressive Global agenda is mapped within the guidelines of an Open Society, a Communist Globalization and an elite whose tentacles have reached across nearly every nation on earth.  Each of these Foundations have wealth exceeding  $500 million to $150 billion.  Follow The Money.

Attempting to attack or replace professors at the universities and in our high schools has about the same effect as treating cancer with Tylenol, it might stay the head-ache, but the cancer will continue to metastasize.

Hungary recently outlawed the Soros funded and sponsored university in Budapest, but a fight ensues for reinstatement.  We can’t simply shut down these universities across the US, we can’t regulate funding which typically is associated with a coercive requirement.  The overwhelming majority of teachers and professors are atheists, are Liberal, are intolerant – this coup has already been forged.

One way the Federal government can defrost the coup is to simply deny any more federal funding for private institutions.  Private Universities in the US are overwhelmingly Liberal.  The funding is typically obscured in the Research and Development area of the school’s programs.  But those programs bump the reputation of a school and its ability to attract more students.   The annual Federal funding is topping over $1 billion per university.

A large percentage of the R&D is for the development of more vaccines for the pharma industry. This means that while Big Pharma is a slush of profits, a slush of executive compensation greed, it is actually enabled and supported by Federal funding, or taxpayer dollars.  And to support the continuation of federal funding, states like California make vaccines mandatory.  The cycle is complete; the population control mandate of the elite is funded by the taxpayers whose bodies are now replete with aluminum, mercury, arsenic, formaldehyde, ethanol, and preservatives, while private industries and elite individuals generate more and more personal wealth.

An example of federal misappropriation of funding can be found in Planned Parenthood – or as the R&D describes it, ‘reproductive health’.  In reality it is eugenics.

If we are going to cease the agenda and reverse the Liberal coup, Federal Funding of R&D at Universities has to end.  Federal Funding of Private Foundations – has to end.  When we follow The Money, it becomes clear that the coup, the Liberal Agenda has been funded by you and I, and that’s why they are laughing.

Hillary vs. Hillary

The media keeps hyping how Hillary is ahead in ‘the polls’. But they don’t mention what poll nor do they say how they phrased the question. For example, if they were to ask, “Of all the Democrats running for president, who would you vote for?” Ummm, she’s the only one running, so I guess that would definitely put her in the lead…

So, what are you supposed to do if you are a democrat or liberal and you can’t stand Hillary?

Where are her Democratic contenders? Has she made a ‘Pac’ with the Devil to keep all other democratic candidates away, denouncing competition? She could compare notes with Kim Jong-un who garnered 100% of the votes, of course he was the only one running, and if you didn’t vote chances are you were shot.

Biden certainly doesn’t conjure up any sense of reality, he’s too easy to laugh at instead of with. But the problem is, no one really wants to spend the money knowing in advance they can’t contend against Hillary’s Soros funded Pacs and bank accounts. Perhaps the agenda is to keep the pool clean. To not dilute the oil with vinegar. And they may be right. One of the problems with Republicans is that too often they divert votes from a party win by having too many candidates spreading a thin layer amongst each. And when the dust settles on one, all the losers have to pretend they like the winner after throwing mud every which way.

As it stands now, there are three Republicans running against one Democrat with a potential run of three additional Democrats and NINE Republicans. I’m already weary in anticipation of the television ads, the rhetoric, the in-fighting, the glossy headlines, the fake smiles, the jabs and jaunts and overload of media deciphering content that is basically – meaningless. UGH!

Who is the biggest winner? The media of course, because they sell all the advertising spots! The money rolls. It certainly would save money to have just one candidate running… Just kidding!

With so much ugliness surrounding her recently, Hillary would seem doomed from the getgo, so what keeps her afloat? Media manipulation, lots of coaching, some plastic surgery, and probably a life coach to help soften that hardline, don’t give a damn attitude.

Re-creating Hillary. Who will she be now?

Apparently, she is targeting the young voters, although I think that’s a mistake. I would think she was far too much like the nasty grandma who pinches your cheek and makes young people cringe. Anyway, as such, her primary issues include: LGBT rights, marijuana, immigration, climate change and education.

A. **Education: 1) increase Pell grants to $10,000 after a person completes a year of ‘national service’. 2) Allow students to refinance loans at lower rates.

What is ‘national service’? Serving in the military. How can students refinance? Not sure yet.

B. **Climate Change: 1) carbon tax (carbon = coal, petroleum and natural gas), and 2) research.

Problem. Non carbon footprints include; wind, sun, hydroelectric and nuclear. Today 70% of electricity is produced using fossil fuels, 50% from coal and 20% from natural gas. Therefore the carbon tax would transfer to electricity as well.

Problem 2: Nuclear waste. We have yet to find of valid and safe method of disposal. We currently have over 88 nuclear facilities in operation with 5 more coming on in the next few years. Young people are hugely concerned about nuclear, especially given the most recent implosion in Japan and the fallout. Selling young people nuclear, is an uphill battle.

And research? I think we’re a bit over uncontrolled research projects that waste immeasurable dollars. Yuck.

C. **Pot: she wants more – research…

D. **LGBT: Advocate.

E. **Immigration: She wants to wave a wand and make everyone here – legal. Problem? What happens to all the people that are in the trials of getting through legally? What happens to those people today, tomorrow and the next day? Do you just open the gates to anyone and everyone unilaterally?

The Ghouls that are out of the closet and following her include:

  1. having upwards of eight to ten different email addresses that she used while Secretary of State illegally.

  2. Benghazi – a mess that caused numerous deaths – conceivably at her hands.

  3. Using an aide while in the White House as Secretary of State who was on two payrolls (illegally) and who has potential ties to the Muslim Brotherhood

  4. operating a foundation that has all sorts of shadowy chemtrails involving Middle East agenda’s the Ukraine agenda and little to no evidence of true charity

  5. advanced age and potential undisclosed health problems

  6. lies unfolding more often that challenge her credibility

Who likes Hillary? Hollywood certainly, she represents the proverbial ‘Queen’. She plays the ‘poor me’ candidate with historical reference to Bill’s dalliances. She has a powerhouse of money backing her. She represents something new – a woman president. Although it isn’t new really like she’s making history. Females who are world leaders include; Brazil, Bangladesh, Argentina, Germany, Liberia, Denmark, Lithuania, Kosovo, Jamaica, – there are 22!

It would be prudent to review why Hillary lost to Obama. The most glaring reason that might encompass a number of faults would be that she was simply too arrogant. She assumed the win would belong to her. And that arrogance follows her much like the dustbowl that follows the character in the Peanuts comic strip, Pigpen.

Once, after bathing and dressing in clean clothes, “Pig-Pen” stepped outside his house, and instantaneously became dirty and disheveled, whereupon he declared to Charlie Brown, “You know what I am? I’m a dust magnet.”

Mr. Bill – First Man…Guy…Gentleman?

With the still undecided possibility of Hilary Clinton running for president, it should be noted that not only would she be the first woman president in the US, Mr. Bill would the First Boy… First Man… First Guy. What would he be? I would hardly defer upon him the title of ‘First Gentleman’. Doesn’t quite fit. But then, maybe Hillary would prefer herself to be known as Her Highness. In which case, Mr. Bill would then be “Hz High”. Sounds creepily like Sieg Heil. Let’s not go there.

Then we would have to define his role in the White House. Would he tend to the flower arrangements and offer tea to the other ladies and High’s? Although the role of First Ladies is not written in code and stamped with approval, the foremost role they are to maintain is ‘Hostess’. Mr. Bill, of course, would be the Hostess with the mostest… The second role is to organize and attend ‘official functions’ and state ceremonies. Mr. Bill would have his own staff including a social secretary and a chief floral designer. He would be called upon to attend reunions with other First Ladies and participate in luncheons and gala’s. He would be lauded for his fashion sense and wardrobe choices as he served behind Hillary. He would get to dedicate libraries with other former First Ladies and read to young school children. He would be surrounded by woman of all ages 24-7.

According the original National First Ladies Library, the following states the decorum that a First Lady is impressed with:

Those who have been most successful (as measured by their own enjoyment of the role, serving the public in a substantive way, being politically involved without assuming the political prerogatives of an elected or appointed official, leaving a permanent public legacy in some measure) have carefully balanced being perceived as a “Queen” of the people while also being a “commoner” who understood their problems and lives.”

Mr. Bill would be responsible to decorate the Christmas tree, and coordinate the gingerbread house, wreaths, lights and angels for the White House. But he would have to give up some of his most precious things as well. The Clinton Foundation would most likely be handed over to Chelsea. They would vacate their estate in Chappaqua, NY that they purchased after leaving the White House which cost $1.7 million, and their second home in DC, which they bought for $2.85 million. Their privacy will be uprooted once again and their emails – scrutinized.

If elected, Hillary would be 69 and Bill 70 upon taking office. Hillary would tie Reagan in being the oldest elected president. Mr. Bill would surpass all previous First Lady/High’s in age; Anna Harrison the oldest at 65, second to Barbara Bush at 64. Both Clinton’s have suffered some health issues, whether age related or not is debatable. Mr. Bill had quadruple bypass surgery and has frailed considerably in recent years. Ms Hillary underwent issues with blood clots, a concussion and fainting that required six months of rehabilitation. Some might be concerned with these issues.

There have been two shows that portrayed a female president; Kisses For My President was released in 1964 and showed a humorous version of the concept, and low rated television series came out in 2004, Commander In Chief, in which Geena Davis played the president. The show didn’t take and was canceled in 2005. Despite the feminism of our society, there are still biases among women and men regarding a female president. Add age, add health, add past dalliances, add revelations of the mouth of Hillary, and well, it is rather ‘cringe worthy’.