CLIMATE Change: The Crystal Ball Theory

As Climate Changes, the media is all a frenzy with more dire predictions, more exhaustive data, and little scientific truth.

I am always thrilled to discover that climate science is reportedly a 50-50 chance crystal ball venue.   If climatologists can’t accurately predict the weather within fifteen minutes of its event, how can we really accept that they know exactly what happened six hundred billion years ago and 1000 years into the future?

The answer is in the word ‘science’ which until recent history was defined as a philosophy, a ‘prediction’.

When the data was disproven over and over again, global warming morphed into ‘Climate Change’. And no one missed a beat. Except for the fact that climate does change, and likely has since the existence of earth, so making the shift opened a truism, but not necessarily one that supported doomsday.

So what’s the real beef?   Why the paranoia alarms?

It’s complicated.

Like most wars, climate change created a mass chaotic frenzy that resulted in a select group of elite benefactors making beaucoup dollero on the heels of fear.   When a war is over, history typically reveals the ridiculous reasoning for instigating the war in the first place.   WWI some stupid ArchDuke guy was assassinated – and thus 100 million + people had to pay with their lives.   But within that catastrophic event billions were made.   When there isn’t a good war, invent a catastrophe: hence Global Warming aka Climate Change.

After WWII, there was the Korean War, Vietnam War, and then when that was tabled, we were catapulted into the Chicken Little Science of the coming ‘Ice-Age’! It made for massive paranoia, and mucho dollero before fizzling and being shelved in the library of science stupidity and oops factor. Never mind.

In a world replete in fake wars, fake catastrophes, fake news, fake media, and fake religion, one would think that we would become immune and realize the one absolute question:   who is making money off the fakery?

In 1977 Time Magazine published a cover piece titled, “How To Survive The Coming Ice-Age.” It offered 51 things one can do to make a difference. And while the media is desperately attempting to justify the trend, the article, the chaotic fear that was instigated, they refuse to take responsibility for – lying. Instead, they are today busily trying to defend these doomsday scenarios as simply a media creation.

Huh?   The media fabricated a story without Scientific justification? How dastardly!

There was the nuclear war scare in the 1960’s wherein children were instructed to hide under their desks so as to circumvent the effects of the imminent nuclear bomb… And we all diligently went thru the drills believing that hiding under a desk would save us from death.

Each generation creates a ‘boogey-man’.

But the impact, the force, the deliberation and contempt exuded by our media for The People continues to be the real ‘boogey man’.   And likely, history will attempt to justify the current obsession with “Climate Change”.

Yes. Climate Changes.   In fact, graphs created by these same scientific onions graph climate for billions of years based on – gasp – tree rings, and then spew it as a truism. Really, that’s all you’ve been able to utilize for your pseudo science theory?

Why do they create a boogey-man at all?

Simplistically it reverts to basic psychology; united we stand, divided we fall. If they can create a united demon, they can control the meme.   Of course, this can be done by both good guys and bad guys and therein lies the fix.   Who to believe?

The media altered the landscape when it became the most corrupt of outlets that we could possibly imagine. The propaganda and psychological ploy was honed.   And a vast portion of society willingly jumped aboard the bandwagon.

Hollywood became enamored with this political power given they had already usurped the moral and ethical power over their subjects. And besides, there was money to be made on the sidelines as one jettisoned about creating a massive global ‘footprint’.

But it does get a bit more complicated.

Most of the world’s greatest country’s have implemented their own version of climate manipulation for decades. Fundamentally altering the natural course of nature, we have inadvertently created a monster – a Frankenstein. In order to deflect that oops factor, Global Warming frenzy was the best means of the Porky Pig routine, “bede, bede, bede”.   Shift the blame, make money on the shift, and by the time society figures it out, I’ll be dead.   Whew!

Even as I write this, the weather forecast for my town has changed five times – for today.   SO much for science. I suggest they need to dust their crystal balls and ask the birds.

Paris Summit -Climate Change

World leaders have gathered together to discuss how much money they are going to put behind climate change. These world leaders would seem to include the likes of Saudi Prince Alaweed bin Talal, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates and George Soros. Funny, I don’t remember electing them??? In fact, I don’t think anyone ‘elected them’. So when did they become the world leaders?  And why are they making decisions for us?

I find it a bit odd that a country whose entire GDP is gained through dirty oil would be present at a climate change conference in which oil and gas are the bad guys. Of course, the fact that Soros is heavily invested in coal should raise an eyebrow or two as well. So how do they intend to reduce CO2 emissions?

According to a glob of theorists, the root cause of ISIS and other terrorists is – climate change. You see, the consensus is that these poor fella’s don’t have a country rich in rain forests and agriculture land and clean rivers and such, and as a result they are angry and lop off peoples heads. Therefore, if we can change the climate, if we can manipulate what is natural to create an altered world, then we will eradicate terrorism. POOF…

Recently I was reading about ice ages and the fact that we are actually at the tail end of an ice age that has lasted millions of years. As such, we are warmer than say 2 million years ago… but cooler than earth was – originally. Yawn. The scientific community has released their definition of an ice age as being a time when ‘the earth experiences notably cooler conditions’. We needed a scientist to tell us that?

In fact, during the present day ‘ice age’ glaciers have advanced and retracted over 20 times, and the height of this ice age was just 20,000 years ago when ice covered most of North America. It is accepted that shifting tectonic plates cause major climate changes, and the natural cyclical shifting of the earth’s orbit and rotation create changes in sunlight patterns. The CO2 emissions that the Summit talks intend to address are actually released by the change in ocean temperatures which occur  when freshwater ice melts into saltwater oceans and changes currents.

That being said, CO2 emissions have a natural cyclical pattern and while each ice age had a beginning and an end, there is no evidence the earth burned up in between. But humans want to control – and in order to control the weather we would need to control tectonics, the earth’s orbit and it’s rotation – I don’t think Soros or Gates have that ability. But I suppose they can pretend.

In the meantime, to add fodder to ozone, these ‘world leaders’ claim that the reason we haven’t really been targeting the oil reserves and supplies that fund ISIS is because we’re afraid that the blast might ‘harm the environment’. Oh dear, oh my, oh my, said Eyore…to Pooh.

Even more hypocritical is that while the Climate Summit is taking place, the Paris police are dumping tear gas on protesters. Tear Gas is actually a chemical weapon banned from use in warfare by the Geneva Convention. It is considered toxic and harmful to the environment!  Eyore?

And according to one French journalist, the Bangladesh refugees are a result of climate change.  But wait, the refugees are from Rohingya and are fleeing persecution and poverty. They number 220,000, and approximately 28,000 have fled to neighboring countries.  Another organization, AOSIS, which represents a number of small islands scattered throughout the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, claims that typhoons continue to disrupt island life – a direct result of global warming.  But large devastating typhoons have been recorded for thousands of years.  The impertinence would seem to be the idea that despite these occurring regularly, the people want to change the weather – instead of changing where they build…

Obama has stated that, “recent economic growth in the United States has come despite a lack of growth in carbon emissions.” So if carbon emission is not growing why is the climate continuing to warm? Oops. Maybe its because the relationship is negligible.

CO2 emissions are both naturally occurring and man-made. The natural impact accounts for about 96% and the man-made for about 4%. Of the man-made, about 85% is derived from fossil fuel burning. But there is another culprit rarely mentioned – nuclear warhead testing. The US is the largest ‘tester’ with upwards of 1132, followed by Russia with 981 and France with 217. Nine have been conducted in the oceans. The tests peaked between 1950 and 1963 when carbon-14 emissions peaked as well.

Lastly, when presenting a graph, just as I exposed in my blog about vaccines, the starting point can be very misleading. According to a graph issued by the University of Wyoming with references to Oxford, the current trend of CO2 emissions began their incline sometime around the mid 1600’s well before fossil fuels. In addition, according to scientists, each ending ice age was met with peaking warm temperatures before the next ice age struck. Another graph shows that we were actually coming out of a mini ice-age that occurred after a significant warming that occurred between 1000 and 1200 A.D..

Are we in a warming trend? Yes. Are CO2 emissions high? Yes. Will changing our 4% of the total CO2 alter the course of nature? Make your own conclusion.

But according to scientific data, ancient historical trends show we are about to fall into a trough of a new ice age…Bill?  George?  Mark?  As world leaders, you seem a bit out of touch.