CLIMATE Change: The Crystal Ball Theory

As Climate Changes, the media is all a frenzy with more dire predictions, more exhaustive data, and little scientific truth.

I am always thrilled to discover that climate science is reportedly a 50-50 chance crystal ball venue.   If climatologists can’t accurately predict the weather within fifteen minutes of its event, how can we really accept that they know exactly what happened six hundred billion years ago and 1000 years into the future?

The answer is in the word ‘science’ which until recent history was defined as a philosophy, a ‘prediction’.

When the data was disproven over and over again, global warming morphed into ‘Climate Change’. And no one missed a beat. Except for the fact that climate does change, and likely has since the existence of earth, so making the shift opened a truism, but not necessarily one that supported doomsday.

So what’s the real beef?   Why the paranoia alarms?

It’s complicated.

Like most wars, climate change created a mass chaotic frenzy that resulted in a select group of elite benefactors making beaucoup dollero on the heels of fear.   When a war is over, history typically reveals the ridiculous reasoning for instigating the war in the first place.   WWI some stupid ArchDuke guy was assassinated – and thus 100 million + people had to pay with their lives.   But within that catastrophic event billions were made.   When there isn’t a good war, invent a catastrophe: hence Global Warming aka Climate Change.

After WWII, there was the Korean War, Vietnam War, and then when that was tabled, we were catapulted into the Chicken Little Science of the coming ‘Ice-Age’! It made for massive paranoia, and mucho dollero before fizzling and being shelved in the library of science stupidity and oops factor. Never mind.

In a world replete in fake wars, fake catastrophes, fake news, fake media, and fake religion, one would think that we would become immune and realize the one absolute question:   who is making money off the fakery?

In 1977 Time Magazine published a cover piece titled, “How To Survive The Coming Ice-Age.” It offered 51 things one can do to make a difference. And while the media is desperately attempting to justify the trend, the article, the chaotic fear that was instigated, they refuse to take responsibility for – lying. Instead, they are today busily trying to defend these doomsday scenarios as simply a media creation.

Huh?   The media fabricated a story without Scientific justification? How dastardly!

There was the nuclear war scare in the 1960’s wherein children were instructed to hide under their desks so as to circumvent the effects of the imminent nuclear bomb… And we all diligently went thru the drills believing that hiding under a desk would save us from death.

Each generation creates a ‘boogey-man’.

But the impact, the force, the deliberation and contempt exuded by our media for The People continues to be the real ‘boogey man’.   And likely, history will attempt to justify the current obsession with “Climate Change”.

Yes. Climate Changes.   In fact, graphs created by these same scientific onions graph climate for billions of years based on – gasp – tree rings, and then spew it as a truism. Really, that’s all you’ve been able to utilize for your pseudo science theory?

Why do they create a boogey-man at all?

Simplistically it reverts to basic psychology; united we stand, divided we fall. If they can create a united demon, they can control the meme.   Of course, this can be done by both good guys and bad guys and therein lies the fix.   Who to believe?

The media altered the landscape when it became the most corrupt of outlets that we could possibly imagine. The propaganda and psychological ploy was honed.   And a vast portion of society willingly jumped aboard the bandwagon.

Hollywood became enamored with this political power given they had already usurped the moral and ethical power over their subjects. And besides, there was money to be made on the sidelines as one jettisoned about creating a massive global ‘footprint’.

But it does get a bit more complicated.

Most of the world’s greatest country’s have implemented their own version of climate manipulation for decades. Fundamentally altering the natural course of nature, we have inadvertently created a monster – a Frankenstein. In order to deflect that oops factor, Global Warming frenzy was the best means of the Porky Pig routine, “bede, bede, bede”.   Shift the blame, make money on the shift, and by the time society figures it out, I’ll be dead.   Whew!

Even as I write this, the weather forecast for my town has changed five times – for today.   SO much for science. I suggest they need to dust their crystal balls and ask the birds.

Fake News, Fake Polls: Divided We Stand!

The other day I was researching various polling entity’s predictions on the Democrat candidates and while I stared at the screen, the numbers for one poll published and completed by Politico for June 30th – changed. Not by 1 or 2 points, but it completely altered the numbers! When I first recorded the numbers it showed: Biden 26%, Warren 16%, Sanders 12%, Buttegieg 9% and Harris 7%.   The altered numbers reverted to: Biden 33%, Sanders 19%, Harris 12%, Warren 12% and Buttegieg 6%.

Obviously, this bought and paid for poll did not align with what the Powers That Be wanted it to say, and thus it was reinvented. But then Politico is a mouthpiece for the Washington Post and New York Times.

The Economist has emerged as a ‘reputable’ polling agency… owned by the Rothschilds it is a mouthpiece for all things Soros. The other ‘major’ polling outfit is Gravis Marketing which advertises itself as having ‘the lowest price guarantee’.   Of course there is CNN – need I say more.

When did polls become ‘fake news’?   Once upon a time, they were looked at with some respect has having an authoritative approach. Today, they have morphed into the genre of The National Enquirer along with the rabid fact-checkers like Snopes.   Snopes has degraded itself to such an extent that a weejee board is likely more accurate than their staff of one.

I came across a list of fake websites, or fake news sites and was equally humored.   Each site that was labeled as such came with a reasoning, and that reasoning was nearly always ‘pro-Trump’.

This has become the era of UN Ambassadors that includes such educated notables as Gweneth Paltrow, Ashley Judd, Leonardo DeCaprio, Nicole Kidman, etc… all radical liberals.   Of course conservatives deride the UN, they are a defunct organization spending millions to do – nothing. In essence, they are a subsidiary of Hollywood. And everyone Hollywood is starry eyed at the glamorized fake reputation that an ambassadorship conveys.

Fake News: Fake news is news, stories or hoaxes created to deliberately misinform or deceive readers. … Fake news stories can deceive people by looking like trusted websites or using similar names and web addresses to reputable news organizations. 

What is a ‘trusted website’?   Who has been at the core of ‘propaganda’?

According to this definition, the CIA and FBI would be the core progenitors of fake news which is supplied to the Washington Post and New York Times. CNN, NBC, WAPO, and NYTimes are no longer considered ‘trusted’, therefore they are at the core of fake news. They deliberately misinform.

The other day I sited The Epoch Times and was derided because it was a conservative leaning media outlet.   Because it was conservative, it was considered fake. Therefore, any media outlet that has partisanship, which would be every media outlet, would by definition be – fake.

Hollywood has created a world stage of fakery and illusion.

Kamala Harris is running for President and yet everything she does and says is plotted and graphed by the Cabal. Her history is white-washed. Her views are puppeted.   Even her skin tone has been altered to appear darker since her days with Willie Brown.   Her very being has been supplanted and she allows this. She has a choice.

Who is funding Harris?

Law firms and Hollywood.   Law Firms: Paul Weiss (who also is funding Booker – hedging his bets), Venable LLP, Ziffren Brittenham specializing in entertainment law, Lowenstein Sandler, and Gibson Dunn and Crutcher are at the forefront. Entertainment: Warner-Media Group, 21st Century Fox, Walt Disney Company and Creative Artists Agency.   This is not coincidental, this is deliberate, controlled and designed. This is a script, acting lessons, coaching, a stage and a three act play.

While Ocasio plays the game from a parlor room, Harris is on Broadway.

They are one and the same.

Biden’s primary fund raiser was attorney, Tom McInerney, who recently revoked his support and claimed others would likely follow. Why? Biden played the fool at the last debate.   It is likely they will move their money to Harris despite her own gaffs and bedding partners. Lest we forget, Obama was a cocaine dealer and Hollywood thought that was just fine and dandy – candy.

The recent narrative is that Trump has a duty to unite this country…   to somehow parlay socialists, liberals, and conservatives into one giant pot of handshaking, back slapping, hunkerers.   Ain’t gonna happen.   Ever. The integration of parties cannot, by definition, ever unite.  At least not in a unit that is a country.   The only way the Marxist/Socialist Nazi’s united was by war and obliteration.   And that is the agenda.

Divided we stand.  

China/US Trade War Impacting EU Businesses?

USA Today is citing doom and gloom statistics as a direct result of the US-China trade war:   “China tariffs could force ‘widespread store closures’ and put $40 billion in sales at risk”.   “UBS claims that 12,000 stores are at risk. A record 8,139 stores closed in 2017, and another 5,864 in 2018”!

And The Sky Is Falling….

I imagine the numbers are absolutely correct, it is the reasoning that is ridiculously skewed. Clothing stores have been particularly at risk for a number of years now given that more and more people shop online.   Many offer free shipping, and some free returns.   This phenomena has caused retail outlets to shutter and the trend is likely to continue with or without China tariffs.

So why would USA Today create a false narrative?

The article is written by Kelly Tyko a self described ‘Bargainista’ who typically writes about where to find the best deals. Really. Need I say more.   It is blatantly inaccurate, and shows a hideous lack of economic insight, while bludgeoning the reputation of USA Today.

In fact, UBS has stated that adjustments to portfolios need not be radical but prudent as they are convinced a deal will be made.

Equally flagrant in promoting an anti-Trump/anti-US posit is Germany’s Deutsche Welle: “One Third of EU Firms Hit Hard By US/China Trade War”.   Cited by the European Union Chamber of Commerce In China.

Established in 2000, this European Chamber is an NGO representing 1600 companies within the EU doing business in China. Their Secretary General, Adam Dunnett, provided a much more interesting and pragmatic perspective on China and doing business in China:

The purpose of the NGO is to create a better market access and business environment with China overall.   According to Dunnett, European investment in China has been steadily decreasing for the past four years. Reforms within the Chinese economy have occurred most recently in the past two years, but the EU companies say it is likely too little, too late, and the positive impact on their businesses has been negligible.   When asked if the reforms instituted by Xi Jinping had encouraged them to invest more in China, the overwhelming response was – No.   EU businesses were already tilting away given that China’s closed door policies caused delays, shred profits, and left a bitter taste.   As such, 5% of businesses simply left for the more lucrative markets in Australia, Vietnam and Singapore.

When asked about the US/China trade war, Dunnett was quite straightforward and rational:   While the impact has affected 50% of the EU businesses, he also stated that, “The frustrations felt by the US, related to reciprocity, IPR infringements, and technology transfer obligations, are by no means new issues – the European Chamber has been raising them consistently for the last 15 years.”

Dunnett goes on to discuss problematics in China’s pharmaceutical policies that have inherent negative consequences on EU businesses – irrespective of the US trade war.

In essence, he appears to quite understand the US position, and recognizes that it is a necessity in order to officiate fair trade in the future.   He sees the current market environment in China as hopeful, but restrains promotion given it remains too restrictive in the present.  As such, he supports moving businesses to more free economies.

Will the trade war impact US businesses? Likely. But the mess that created such a massive trade imbalance ricocheted like crazy rising 400% between 2004 and 2018. TO do nothing would be reprehensible!

Ultimately, as Romney pointed out when he deigned to be President, China is buying our country, and owns our debt.  This is accomplished through trade imbalances.   If that is a good thing – then move to China. Unfortunately, Romney proved to be a false Republican, a McCainer surrounded by Swamp reptiles.  Still, he was correct with regard to China.

At least Adam Dunnett speaks from sensibility and reality. Hopefully, USA Today and Deutsche Welle will hire actual journalists to report on the global economics, instead of Bargainistas and Soros plebes.

China Trade War – MSM Playing The Wizard Of Oz…

CNBC’s Emma Newberger has published an article claiming that Goldman Sachs the has stated; “cost of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump last year against Chinese goods has fallen “entirely” on American businesses and households…”   Goldman says there are two very detailed, item level studies that prove that Chinese imports remain at the same price. In addition, the US GDP could be hit by a .4% decline.

I suppose to some this sounds devastating. But when analyzed just a bit, the entire article is misleading at best, an illusion, and a tactical study in propaganda at the very least.

The article does not provide any link to any studies. It cites no statistics.   There is no historical graph.   In fact, it is red Jello with absolutely no cherries. Hospital food.

Between 2016 and 2017, the Consumer Price Index, before the levy of ANY tariffs, rose 2.1%.   In 2018, the CPI increased 1.9%.   Between 1970 and 2018, the CPI rose 25% with a starting point of -10%.   This increase coincides with the increase in the ‘money supply’ which doubled into Nirvana land during the Obama administration.

As for the US GDP rate, in 2017 it was 2.3%. In 2018, GDP increased to 2.9%. And in the first quarter of 2019, it increased 3.2%.   A .4% decline from the previous year would amount to a total reduction of .0116 resulting in a new rate of 3.18%.

Just three months ago, the very liberal CNN authored a story in which they claim that “the Chinese economy has slowed severely.   It has hit its lowest level in three years.   And it is much, much weaker than government figures suggest.” Local businesses blame the trade wars.   Senior China economist at Capital Economics claims the economy of China shrank 3% last year making the Goldman Sachs argument smell like a dairy farm.

The problem with the media is they do not have the power to ‘delete’ history, and so instead they attempt to rewrite it.   But a five minute research by anyone can quite literally unfold the truth and reveal a plethora of lies. In politics, they call them ‘gaffes’.   In the media, they are fake news.

Goldman Sachs is thus guilty of – fake news.

Barron’s claims that the US economy is slowing down. They site different methodologies for measuring the growth and choose to eliminate certain ones so as to lower the actual numbers.   But a measurement is only so good as it’s comparable historical measure. To conveniently eliminate certain industries because they might ‘artificially inflate’ the number means one would have to eliminate those numbers for all history. It is a defeating argument, designed to manipulate and propagandize the economy.

In essence, when analyzing the manufacturing industry of the US, Barron’s has determined that the current outlook is ‘half as bad’ as the decline from 2014-2016 during the Obama reign.

All numbers are intertwined.   If economists are going to extrapolate specific numbers without looking at the whole, then there will always be fluctuations, but the whole is the ultimate grade of an economy, not the individual parts.

The Gestalt theory, expressed in psychological terms in the 1920’s, understood that the whole is a sum of the parts.   Thus extracting ‘a part’ denies the whole. My father named his sailboat, “Gestalt”.

If one reviews the news from farmer and agriculture sites, as opposed to political news sites, the concerns are not so much China as: weather, disease, techniques, herbicides, trends, organics, toxicity, soil – all the normal discussions among those inside the industry.

What they aren’t discussing is – China.

What this reveals is that the MSM is manufacturing a Farming crisis without a farmer, they are creating an Economic crisis without a study or statistic, and they are creating an illusion without – magic.

In fact, the MSM is no different than the Wizard of Oz, a slight, old man, standing behind a great curtain, using machines to create smoke and noise so as to scare Dorothy and her companions, when in fact, there is nothing wrong – at all – and they all can find what they want inside themselves without the idiotic, narcissist behind the curtain.

POOF….

Trump’s China Trade War – The Facts

The Federal Reserve and the World Bank at the behest of a handful of economists who are decidedly left leaning have published two scathing reports which claim that Trump’s trade war with China is costing US taxpayers upwards of $68 billion annually.

Of course the statements are biased. Of course they represent an agenda and potential fodder. If they are true.

Economists are an interesting breed. They sit in glass houses and create a conclusion without seeming to have a basic understanding of real world business and tend to adamantly disagree with each other on a broader scale while presenting a portion of the facts.

Somewhat like the climate change fiasco.

Trades are business contracts. They may be executed as a one-time transaction, transactions that occur over a series of months, and often are transactions that are locked years.   They take time to execute. Terms are pre-determined. Terms are re-negotiated.

These ‘Economists’ have made a determination based on data that is virtually impossible to track. In addition, their supposition ‘estimates’ an annual cost. But even that is wholly unreliable because the Tariffs were imposed over the course of several months in 2018, with intellectual property, aluminum and steel at the forefront.   They effectively began in July and phased in over a number of months.

China’s “implemented and ‘proposed’ tariffs” would affect $110 billion of imports. That does not mean the US exports stop. It means they will be levied a tariff which will effect the profit margin.

The economist’s reports both extrapolate the outcome as an annual loss. A year has not yet occurred.   In fact, there is only two months of trade numbers in 2019 to analyze. Certainly one can extrapolate based on previous data… right? Yes and no.

It is like a poll wherein a random sample of 1000 Democrats all residing in New York are sampled and the results will determine the US Presidential election…

Example:   During Obama’s reign trade data is available on a monthly basis.   At the end of 2008 when Obama came into office, the US trade deficit with China was roughly $268 billion.   By the end of 2016 when Obama left office, it was $347 billion. Before any tariffs had any measurable impact, by the end of 2017 the deficit had climbed to $375 billion.

This ‘non-important’ deficit has climbed every single year since it began in 1986. Since 2000, it has quadrupled. And not one sitting President did a damn thing.

Suddenly, with two measurable months of data available for 2019, the media is calling Trump’s trade war a calamity.

In actuality, the value of imports for January and February of 2019 were down 10% and 20% respectively compared to the previous year – before any tariffs were imposed.

Lets look at another trading partner – Germany.

When Obama came into power that deficit was roughly $28 billion. By the time Obama left office that deficit had spiked to nearly $65 billion. It torched at $68 billion by the end of 2018, well before Trump’s tariffs took effect. The first two months of 2019, the deficit had lowered nearly 10%.

Even in the world of an Economist, 2 months is clearly not enough of a data set to make any conclusion or opinion.   And yet they do. Why?

Obviously it is an attempt to discredit Trump and provide fodder for Democrats who are bent on finding fodder because they are frustrated with the incorrigible corruption, instead of truth.

What this also reveals is the larger picture in which both the US Federal Reserve and the World Bank are colluding in this massive demonization of all things Trump.     It also reveals that these institutions have provided absolutely no guidance or stipulations or concern for the annual increase in US trade deficit for the last 30 years.

Which technically is a reflection on their incompetence. Economic Policy is their mainstay. Their existence. So obviously they did not have the US in their sights for at least 30 years.

Why?
1) According to it’s own website, the World Bank’s field of study is on ‘Developing Countries’.   So why did they commission a report on Trump’s China trade – two well developed countries outside of the scope of their jurisdiction?

2) The second part of these reports claims that US agriculture farms have been hit hard by Trump’s tariffs.   But the agriculture business isn’t the mom and pop farm of a hundred years ago. Mainstream media have been sounding the alarm on the changing face of farms for a decade or two.

Statistics: Most small farms are ‘hobby farms’.   Tax incentives during the Bush and Obama years gave wealthy elites the ability to classify their compound acreage in the middle of such places as Long Island and the Hamptons as farmland, take a tax benefit, and produce enough to feed a cat.

Secondly, ‘large farms make up less than 4% of all farms and account for more than 66% of all sales. And that number continues to edge higher.   They are corporate farms.

And third, the Federal government continues to subsidize small farms up to $20 billion annually.

The value of agricultural exports to China is roughly $23 billion, which represents about 5% of all production in US.

It isn’t just the US Swamp that is fearful of Trump. It is The Swamps that exist globally.   He has turned their power off. He has broken the rules. He does not recognize their structure. And he wants to fix the chaos that they have so dedicatedly created for well over a hundred years.

Certainly there have been a few anomalies in the US; Kennedy, surely. But his fate and that of his brother reveal how determined the International Swamp is to maintain their brotherhood as is.

Lastly, the Federal Reserve Bank:   What is their job? Primarily – to address ‘banking panics’. Secondarily to manage money supply.   In 2012 when Obamanomics was considered an economic catastrophe the response of the Federal Reserve was not to commission economist papers, but to ‘do something’ to leverage that catastrophe. They have no business commissioning reports – outside of their Banking duties.

Trump recently threatened to take down the Federal Reserve; his animosity for that corrupt regime has been no secret.

The Enemy of my Enemy is My Friend.

Trump has been in office two+ years. He has fought for The People while being verbally attacked, legally attacked, his family in jeopardy, his life threated, and still he rose for us.  They are – running scared.

Open Democracy: Dark Money NGO

Open Democracy, a UK political website, has released a damning report claiming that Trump and his evangelical conservative dark money has poured $51 million into election meddling in the EU since 2008!  

The list of contributors linked to Trump include: Billy Graham Association, American Center for Law and Justice, Alliance Defending Freedom, Human Life International, Focus on the Family, Family Watch International, etc… etc… etc… The recipients of this egregious dark money would seem to be a secret given Open Democracy makes no actual conclusion.

Open Democracy is funded by the Soros Open Society Foundation, the Ford Foundation and The National Endowment For Democracy. Some of the dark money contributors are listed as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Given the SPLC is currently undergoing intense internal legal ranglings for sexual harassment and gender prejudice, the Open Democracy allegation makes sense.   It is called ‘retribution’ – vengeance – tit-for-tat.

Fake News. Where are the media police?

The attempt to demonize Trump has taken a new shift in attempting to link him to these various Christian conservative groups which lobby like every NGO for their agenda.   To suddenly determine that lobbying is somehow nefarious would be akin to asserting communist government control over everything – including the Open Society Foundation, Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, etc.

So what is the point of this article?

Open Democracy was founded by Anthony Barnett, whose latest hit piece on Trump detailed his collusion with Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, Google, BREXIT, Farage,

WikiLeaks, and of course, Russia.

Barnett founded Charter 88, a Liberal Socialist British ‘pressure group’ that advocated for constitutional and electoral reform.   Charter 88 merged with New Politics Network in 2007.   New Politics Network was the legal successor to the Communist Party of Great Britain.

Open Democracy is funded by Socialist/Communist NGO’s, and Alliance Defending Freedom is funded by Capitalist/Christian NGO’s.   The Socialist Cabal has control of the mainstream media, has taken over once conservative sites, is censoring social media and now is focusing their attacks on NGO’s. Given Trump is their biggest nemesis, they assert his alignment with everything they attack because it furthers the propaganda.

In essence, what we have is a circle of Communists crying foul because the corrupt Soros funded Southern Poverty Law Center is being tagged with extensive lawsuits and thus they need to reach their tentacles across the spectrum of conservatism while somehow attempting to create a demonizing link between Trump…Putin…Bannon…and Jay Sekelow, Trump’s attorney.

If the American people have awoken to the true criminal thread, perhaps the citizens of the EU have not. A last ditch effort to kill BREXIT and vilify EU countries that align with the alt right parties is simply that, a last ditch wherein the crumbling infrastructure of the Cabal falls.

In its scathing report, Open Democracy is attempting to create a schism not just relegated to left vs right politics, but Christian vs everyone else.   Dark money refers to any money spent by any NGO in politics.   Before Trump, it may have swayed a few, but in today’s world it merely serves to highlight desperation.

France’s Macron- Yellow Vests Inciting Anti-Semitism…

Deutsche Welle front page news is the dastardly anti-Semitic insults hurled by the Yellow Vests on the streets of Paris against a Parisian resident Jew, Alain Finkielkraut.  A)  It would appear that the photo of Finkielkraut used by DW does not exist – or has been photoshopped to add him into the image,  and B)  the dastardly language that is insulting to all Jews includes:  “we are the people”, and “France is ours”.  These horrific anti-Jewish insults were reported by ‘someone who heard them’.   And for this, a government investigation will ensue to determine who to prosecute for making racist statements…while Macron stands at the ‘Helm” making dastardly anti-France hurlizations…

The NEW France.

Of course, the fact that Finkelkraut is mired in his own slew of racist slurs, colonial views, and his adamant assertion that the 13 year old ‘girl’ who was raped by Polanski was really a teen-ager and thus it was consensual… don’t make the mainstream version of events.

While the official line is that a police investigation is in action, citing an online video that was published which indicts the Yellow Vests as radical racists, and Finkelkraut whining much like the Academy Award winner, Ford, during the Kavanaugh hearings, it appears the episode is somewhat unverified, other than a political stunt to perhaps garner attention and sympathy for a man mired in his own racial prejudice and quite ‘colorful background’.

What it did provide is a propaganda tool to demonize the Yellow Vest Movement which has not lessened its protests despite Macron imprisoning over 8400, and aggressive actions by the police causing one person to lose an eye and another to lose his hand as live grenades are launched into crowds for dispersion purposes. Let’s just sit back and imagine the press if Trump allowed the use of live grenades to disperse a protest…

This poor man…

IN the 1990’s Finkelkraut founded an Institute on Levinassian Studies at Jerusalem with Benny and Bernard Levy.  Mr. Benny’s principle interests included Marxism and Moaism.  Mr. Bernard has been criticized for his ‘neo-fascism’ views and ideologies.  All three are/were atheist Jews, Benny is dead.   Lesser infractions include, insider trading, plagiarism, citing spoof as fact, and, of course, radical ‘leftist’ views, including – Communism.

A ‘Tale of Two Cities’ has become a Despot for every fake news outlet in the EU with completely fabricated accounts making the circuit on a routine basis, picked up without verification, without evidence, the most recent being a six year old beheaded for being Shia which made the rounds in the UK bludgeon, only to fade into obscurity as it became hideously obvious it was – FAKE.

Where is the outrage?   Absent.   Because the propaganda, the promotion, was likely MI6.

The French media is portraying this Marxist, Moaist, Communist, Racist, Finkelkraut as a ‘Philosopher’, a victim, a Jewish man just out for a stroll who is suddenly in the midst of the Yellow Vest protests, who, without any provocation, was suddenly identified for who he is, and threatened.   “I have never felt such hate…”  He Exclaims!

But who would even know who he was?  Who would recognize this old man sauntering amidst the protestors?   He is not terribly recognizable.   How would they identify him as Jewish?  He has done nothing noteworthy for over a decade.  To assume he was identified as a Jew and threatened for his Jewness when he is a devout Atheist who advocates Communist ideals is a bizarre concept?

On the other hand, it might make sense that if someone did actually recognize who he was, they were recognizing a man who asserted Communist, Fascist, Moaist ideals that maybe didn’t align with France…and they were peeved.

Good Grief France – is this the best you can conjure???

Michael Cohen’s Attorney, Lanny Davis – A PR Hit Man Playing The Media

Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, is wrestling with fear.  Facing three years in prison, his desperation can be smelled a mile away, it is an odor, a stench, and he is looking for some means of pulling Trump down in order to save his skin.   He is looking for – a deal, and could care less if he sells his soul.   It would appear ethics are no longer a part of the game despite his history as an attorney subject to the legal doctrines he swore to follow.

Who Gives A Damn…

Most recently, Buzzfeed launched a worldwide twitter over a false claim regarding Cohen, it was refuted by Mueller.   Now, Cohen has stated he is delaying congressional testimony citing ‘threats against himself and family made by Trump and Guiliani’.   While he offers no specifics, and no evidence, the claim remains in the Cloudosphere of media.  As an attorney, he fully knows the legal ramifications of making false statements – but perhaps his spokesman is manipulating the media feed frenzy under the guise of PR.  Cohen, like various marionettes of the  Democrats, is thus subject to the whims of his own attorney/PR Agent – provided to him and paid for by the Democrat Party.

Who is advising Cohen? Who is leaking false information?

It very well may be Cohen’s own lawyer, Lanny Davis.

In August 2018, Davis released a statement to CNN stating that “Michael Cohen was going to tell investigators the president knew about the infamous meeting in which Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer. It was going to be the bombshell of the year.”

Later, after it was proven to be a false story, Davis backtracked and said he may have ‘misled’ CNN and apologized – as in uh-oh, oops…

Lanny Davis is now representing Cohen.  Davis was special counsel to President Bill Clinton from 1996 to 1998.   Davis’ bio lists him as being a ‘political operative, lobbyist and a television commentator’, as well as his role as ‘attorney’.   He was on the Democrat National Committee and oversaw Clinton’s impeachment trial.  He was a vocal supporter of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential run and appeared on CNN and MSNBC as her spokesperson before aligning himself with Obama.  Davis has been criticized for using his position and contacts to lobby for various dictatorships across the globe in exchange for huge sums.  But he has ‘friends’.

What may be most damning about Lanny Davis is an email exchange between he and Hillary in 2010 when she was Secretary of State that was released as part and parcel of the Hillary email scandal.  In one particularly relevant email he is literally begging Hillary for a favor.   He references mean spirited shots that will likely be made against him as a consequence of the policies and positions taken by his organization “Purple Nation”. (It would appear that Purple Nation has since – shuttered).

“I fully anticipate there will be personal and professional mean spirited shots  at me in the story that is inevitable especially from those attorneys who still don’t accept that what I do is unusual as well as the hateful rightwing (and perhaps even more from the left who don’t like my Purple Nation approach and my effort to make bad countries better!!!)”

He then gives himself glowing affirmation by listing Karl Rove, President Clinton, President Bush, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Mike McCurry as those who have already issued sweet nicey nice letters of support.   He ends the email gushing about Hillary being his best friend and the best person he has ever known in his lifetime…  He skated.

Davis is most recently co-founder of Trident DMG along with Joshua Galper.  Galper’s political influence would seem to stem from his relationships with John Kerry, Obama, and Rahm Emanuel, the very controversial mayor of Chicago.

Galper would seem to be an expert in cybersecurity and Data Privacy and in those capacities has worked with the World Economic Forum and The Aspen Institute. I wonder if he worked on Hillary’s email server…

Adam Goldberg, also a Trident co-founder, specifies that he worked on the ‘Monika Lewinsky’ issue with Clinton providing advice and strategies.

And if you aren’t smiling yet!  The fourth co-founder of Trident is Eleanor McManus.  Her claims to fame include being a former CNN journalist,  and “a proven track record of defining and driving communications and media strategies, securing media stories in print, radio, and broadcast outlets, including The Washington Post, New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Politico, The Hill, ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, NBC News, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Wired, Tech Crunch, ReCode, and Vanity Fair.”

In other words, she tells these media outlets what to print.

In addition, her bio states:   “Eleanor was responsible for planning, booking, and producing exclusive interviews with iconic newsmakers and well-known political figures including Presidents Obama, Clinton, and Ford, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, every Presidential candidate in both 2004 and 2008, foreign leaders including Russian Presidents Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Queens Noor and Rania of Jordan.”

Trident would seem to be an instrumental hit team behind the media anti-Trump pulse with Michael Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis, at the helm.  Their website Press Page is a veritable hit list of antagonistic anti-Trump media pieces including:   Christine Blasey Ford is Risking It All To Speak Out, Tell The Truth About Donald Trump, Lanny Davis, The Ultimate Clinton Loyalist, Porn Actress Drama Raises Risk For Trump, Hope Hicks May Hold The Keys To Mueller’s Russia Puzzle, Trump’s Legal Team No Match For Mueller’s… etc… etc… etc…  

Everything they say is to instigate the media, it is a PR tactic that has proven effective no matter if the statement is a complete fabrication because many people never learn of the retraction and only know of the pulse – aka, the outrage over an altered video depicting the maga hat teen, Nick Sandmann, supposedly staring down a drum beating Indian whose story has been refuted and degraded as being utterly and completely – false.

And suddenly Cohen is delaying his testimony – just another PR stunt bought and paid for by the Billy and Hillary Clinton subversion tactical team… Tactics II.

Germany: The Ally That Was – And Isn’t…

Facebook has 2.27 billion users monthly.  Today they announced the ‘unprecedented’ deletion of 500 pages and accounts… which represents a dastardly .00002%.   All of these accounts were logged from Ukraine, central Europe, eastern Europe and Russia.   In 2017 Facebook clocked nearly $40 billion in ad revenue, and these dastardly accounts had the nerve to spend $135,000 over six years, representing less than .0001% of their total revenue for six years.  Still this deserves front page news!  Why?  Because according to the liberal media, these accounts were ‘loosely related to Russia’ even if they weren’t.

In fact, 13 people worked for Russia’s Internet Research Agency… oh wait, no, those people were indicted 3 years ago.  But still, that is – ‘The Spin’!

What was their dastardly offense?  Why these pages purged?  They were apparently, anti-NATO, anti-corruption, and discussed protest movements…, and one page actually was ‘linked’ loosely, somehow to Russian media Sputnik.  Unknown how.

Of course the fact that every country in the world now has multiple ‘government’ owned media conglomerates would seem to be a repressed reporting technique.

Germany emphatically demanded Facebook purge any account that Germany felt breeched their definition of hate speech, and went so far as to legalize their ability to fine any social media platform that failed to do so within a stated period of time.

Germany, the ally that – wasn’t.

Germany was an ally as long as a Progressive, Socialist, Democrat was in power in the US.   Then Germany wasn’t.  An ally refers to a nation which is united with another due to treaty and/or common cause and purpose.   Therefore, if the US chooses a President who is not of the Socialist ilk, then the US is no longer an ally.   Hence the German liberal/socialist media is lashing out at anyone in the US who represents an alliance with our current President, Donald Trump.  Oddly, despite strict laws against ‘hate speech’, these defaming German outlets are apparently free to wage defamation and hate – against anyone and anything – conservative.

Der Spiegel has issued a scathing article in which the US Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, is labeled a pro-Trump, alt-right, right wing colonial officer.   How does Germany define hate speech?

Whosoever, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace:

  1. incites hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins, against segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population or calls for violent or arbitrary measures against them; or
  2. assaults the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously maligning an aforementioned group, segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population, or defaming segments of the population,

shall be liable to imprisonment from three months to five years.[

Based on Germany’s definition, it would appear that Der Spiegel is more than obviously guilty of crossing this law and should be subject to penalty.   But of course they won’t be because the law is only upheld when it serves the purpose of the Socialist Democrat Party.

What did Grenell say that was so offensive and thus deserving of a thrashing by German media?  In referring to Merkel’s refugee policy he said, “There was no plan in place.”    “…anyone calling for secure borders in Germany today faces an “overreaction.””  And, “…anyone who speaks openly about the issue runs the risk of being portrayed as being part of the “radical far-right” by the German media.”

Which of course was exactly what then occurred as Der Spiegel went on a rampage to defame Grenell, thus hypocritically upholding Grenell’s claim…

Der Spiegel was embroiled in its own massive fraud in 2018 when it came to light that their darling reporter, former CNN journalist Claas Relotius, had fabricated many/nearly all of his stories including infamous anti-Trump and anti-American spews and won awards for them. Despite the publication claiming it has the most extensive fact checking system of all media, the Der Spiegel fact checkers apparently failed miserably for 2 years while Clads was employed with them, and roughly 4 years while at CNN.

Who owns Der Spiegel?

It is a cross of owners including; Gruner + Jar which is owned by Bertelsmann, and employees. Bertelsmann was sympathetic to, and supplier for the Nazi’s during WWII.  During that period their revenues soared while they employed jewish slave labor who were forced to work for the paper in Lithuania.   Reinhard Mohn, who ran the company after the War was himself a Nazi under Rommel.    In 1993, he donated 69% of his shares in Bertelsmann to the Bertelsmann Foundation.  Their ‘projects include; globalization, immigration, and redistribution of wealth.   More importantly, they emphasize digital globalization and censoring of – fake news – unless of course that news is generated through their partners including;  Vox, RTL, Der Spiegel, Brigitte, STERN, Gala, and Harvard Business Manager.

Der Spiegel has also been embroiled in its own history of subversion charged with engaging with the Nazi’s, Third Reich reporting, distorting history, and covering up for Nazi’s and SS Officers.  Interesting that they would refer to the US Ambassador Grenell as a “neo-Nazi”…  But then this is the liberal agenda: accuse your opponent of the evil that is within you.

Der Spiegel represents the German Government, Merkel, and all things NWO.   But they are the strings for Bertelsmann wherein the power lies.   And in its current and previous history, Bertelsmann was directly interlaced within the Nazi Regime.  Not simply through a slur of some Hollywood Socialist, but through absolute participation, membership, and governance.

And THEY fear Trump and all the Deplorables more than anything.

FACT CHECK Organizations – Liberal, Biased and Comical

A new and improved Fact checking – media bias – organization is making its way around the world of news – creatively calling themselves ‘media bias fact check’.   Organized in 2015, their tag line is ‘the most comprehensive media bias resource’.  The founder/editor Dave Van Zandt states that he uses volunteers to do his bidding and that he has a degree in communications.   Some of his fact checking point pieces link back to PolitiFact, another fact checking media bias organization.   Many, if not most, of these unbiased unaffiliated fact check checkers are hugely biased and left leaning and are promoted by Facebook as the real deal.  

In actuality, they aren’t remotely the real deal, and so incredibly biased it could be comical, except that some people actually believe them.

One of PolitiFacts latest scourge was to call Trump a half-liar because he said the Democrats wanted the wall before he wanted the wall.  According to PolitiFact, not all Democrats wanted the wall, just Hillary, Schumer, and Obama.  Secondly, they didn’t build a wall – they built a fence.   Really!  Therefore, Trump lied.  Really! That is their logic and rationale.

PolitiFact is funded by the uber liberal Knight Foundation, and it’s CEO, Alberto Ibarguen, who are heavy donors to Clinton.  Other liberal donors include, Ford Foundation, Democracy Fund, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The Democracy Fund was created by Pierre Omidyar of eBay and donated heavily to Hillary, Obama and Pelosi.  A prevue of their site is much like reading the Washington Post – it is a swarmy replication of anti-Trump, anti-Hannity, pro-Obama cheap-o-meter garbage.

In 2018, The Poynter Institute acquired PolitiFact.    The Poynter Institute receives its funding from Omidyar, Bill and Melinda Gates, Google, Open Society Foundations, National Endowment for Democracy and the Park Foundation.

The National Endowment For Democracy is funded by none other than the US Congress.   The President of NED is Carl Gershman who previously served as Executive Director of Social Democrats USA, and was an officer of the Young Peoples Socialist League.   In 2006, he laughingly stated that he’s not really a Socialist, he’s now a Democrat…

PolitiFact now utilizes a live fact stream whereby they claim the moment a politician makes a statement on television, it is fact checked for being true or false which means a) they have to make an analysis within seconds,  and b) john Q public is immediately streamed a Democrat liberal bias.

While PolitiFact desperately highlights the fact that they won a Pulitzer Prize, a)   The Pulitzer has been discredited routinely for only rewarding liberals – over a 31 year span only 5 conservatives won prizes for commentary,  and b) in order to be considered for the prize, you enter yourself and pay an entry fee.  For example, the current administrator on the board formerly worked for the liberal – New York Times.  Essentially it is much like Hollywood’s Golden Globes, wherein liberal Hollywood honors liberal Hollywood.

So what we have is an unbiased, unaffiliated fact checker organization funded by Socialists, Democrats, and Soros that is promoted as the Real McCoy by Facebook to shut down Trump, bloggers and conservatives as ‘false’ while regurgitating fake news.

Snopes has been around since 1994 and was created by David and Barbara Mikkelson.   It too has claimed to be unbiased, unaffiliated, and just a good ole boy urban legend outfit that happens to be used by MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, and Forbes.

Snopes was fact checked by Factcheck.org which gave it an A+++.  Factcheck.org is owned by the Annenberg Foundation and was launched by former CNN reporter, Brooks Jackson.  No bias there…   In 2015, Barbara and David Mikkelson went through a very nasty, bitter, scandal fueled divorce in which she claimed that he was spending their ad money like it was jelly beans, hiring prostitutes, and looting the company.  Barbara filed a lawsuit.   He countersued.  David is now sole owner of Snopes has remarried and hired on his staff, Elyssa Young, a former escort and porn actress.  In 2004, Elyssa ran for Hawaii’s 1stCongressional District as a Libertarian and lost flatly.  David has also hired as one of his principle fact checkers, Kim LaCapria, whose former experience includes her own blogosphere site, Vice Vixen, an exploitive site that discussed sex, sex toys, hedonism and fetishes.  She brags that she is high on pot when she writes for Snopes.

Many of the Fact Checking sites are so biased it is absurdity at its finest, or lowest, it is a form of censorship, it is replete with fakery and anonymity.  They are supported and funded by liberal Democrats bent on feeding the public a Mockingbird of information.  Basically, they work for the same liberal media they fact check…  Coockoo…