FACEBOOK’s Whistleblower; Wylie Coyote BLOWS

A Canadian, Christopher Wylie, has come forth as the ‘whistleblower’ behind the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica dispute. His profile is sketchy, interesting, and doesn’t quite make sense…fit:

 

1) He left school at 16 without graduating. 2) He claims to have worked on the campaign of Liberal would be politician, Michael Ignatieff at 17.   3) Between 18 and 20 he claims to have learned everything he knows under the tutelage of President Obama’s, “National Director of Targeting’ (there is no such agency). 4) Despite having no high school degree, he claims to have gone to the London School of Economics to study law at the age of 20.   5)   He has a Twitter account that states it was opened in 2016, however, it has a handful of ‘tweets’, all of which were produced March 2018.   6)   While in the UK he began working for the Liberal Party in ‘voter targeting’. 7)   With no degrees, he became Director of Research at Cambridge Analytica.   8)   He gave The Guardian information about the alleged data mining in March 2017 – but nothing was said until March 2018.

He is most definitely ‘enjoying’ his recent fame.

So how is it that an obvious pro-Libeal, Obama studded young guy with no education came to be the Director of Research at a very conservative organization?

He claims that his Liberal Democrat friends helped him get the Analytica job in 2013… He claims a personal relationship with Bannon and the Mercers, and yet, he is no one…

The primary funders of Analytica were the Mercers who were also part owners in Breitbart and Renaissance Technologies, a hedge fund.   They are decidedly Conservative.

SCL Group, the parent company of Analytica, apparently also had contracts with the British government which expired and were not renewed by Theresa May.   In addition, they had contracts with the US Defense Department, prior to Trump.   They have been used as a propaganda tool by numerous corporations and governments in Africa, Asia, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, and Latin America.

His most recent claim is the notion that BREXIT was corrupted by his company’s meddling.   What he fails to mention is the fact that George Soros was instrumental in funding the anti-BEXIT campaign. So why isn’t Soros being ‘regulated’? 

Soros NGO’s have been a dominant meddler in media spin, propaganda spin, and corruption for decades, and yet an allowance was given within the Liberal Parties across the globe… because he used his data to their benefit. When Trump used the same analytics, suddenly the Wolves cried ‘UNFAIR’.

Why aren’t the UK and US governments being brought under scrutiny for their role in election meddling across the globe?

And why is the word of this one person, a die hard liberal with an agenda to pick, taken as the gospel truth without further evidence gathering? 

And why is it not discussed that all this took lace under the Obama and Cameron administrations?

And given that Facebook was a party to the Liberal agenda of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, in conjunction with Google, why isn’t she held accountable?

What makes this different is the alleged use of Facebook. But Merkel uses Facebook to censor information in Germany?   How is this different?   Facebook censors itself…   and typically conservative news is the victim. So how is this different?

As has been reported by The Guardian, who led the Analytica story, there are many more companies doing the exact same thing for different campaigns across the globe.   Using computer modeling they simply tap into the frustrations of a class of people and use their frustrations to create slogans and content for the politicians to enhance in speeches. Actually, its not that much different than dressing for the part – remember Nixon vs Kennedy?

Obama utilized these tactics to win his election in 2012…   but no one considered it a crime, in fact, he was lauded for his savvy!

Obviously, Wylie Coyote is a hyped front for the more sinister desire to shut down the conservative voice from Facebook, and other social media platforms given that the MSM has already been devoured by the Big Bad Wolf!

Generally something smells because it stinks.

The Guardian – Trump Impeachment!

The Guardian is headlining a Trump Impeachment story that is rife with pathetic sources and unproven allegations.

  1. They quote an “influential, 13 term Democrat Congresswoman”. This unnamed influence is none other than Maxine Waters, a disgraced Congresswoman who was involved herself in allegations of corruption wherein she and her family gained monetarily as a direct result of her actions in Congressional decisions, including TARP.

She had a close relationship with Fidel Castro, thanking him for helping people who needed to flee political persecution.

In 2011, Judicial Watch named Maxine Waters as one of the ten most corrupt politicians.

A video of her slamming Shell Oil CEO at a hearing reveals she is a Liberal Socialist stating; ‘This Liberal is about taking over and the government running all of your companies”.

She is continually quoted as demeaning Trump, and stating that she will initiate impeachment proceedings because he ‘doesn’t have good values”, he “is acting in this manner”, and he’s “the most outrageous and ridiculous President”.

This is The Guardians prime source for a Trump Impeachment.

  1. Their second reasoning source is the FBI Bombshell announcement. And who do they source? Why the esteemed, Dan Rather.  Rather claims that the Trump-Russia allegation is going to be bigger than Watergate… Of course, Rather was the main character of the Rathergate Controversy in which 6 documents critical of George Bush’s tenure in the Air National Guard proved to be forgeries. Much like the Trump Dossier…

Rather was fired along with his story producer Mary Mapes. In 2007 Rathers initiated a lawsuit claiming wrongful discharge of employment, while still claiming the forged documents were true and that CBS was simply using him as a scapegoat. The suit was dismissed by New York State Appeals Court in 2009.

This is The Guardians secondary source for a Trump Impeachment.

  1. Their third choice is John Bonifaz, an attorney who has created numerous ‘non-partison’ Liberal organizations aimed at election reform. He also attempted to find grounds for the impeachment of George Bush for misleading statements that led to the Iraq War.

His statement that is used to convict Trump is, “I think there are many members of Congress who are deeply troubled.   I think it’s only a matter of time before a resolution gets introduced in the United States Congress that starts this process of an impeachment investigation in the House of Representatives.”

He then states that Vice President Mike Pence will be the one initiating the process.

This is The Guardians third source.

This isn’t the first time the Pence rumor has floated and it is sounding more and more like a deliberate fakery in order to ‘divide and conquer’ at the very core. Only the Liberal media have run this line – without any evidence whatsoever.

But then The Guardian has a trail of tears from laughingly calling for the assassination of Bush, to hiring a Muslim terrorist to write copy for them. While they claim they had no idea he was a member of the Hizb ut-Tahrir terrorist organization, that doesn’t exactly bode well for a new organization claiming they are the best and most trusted and most in-depth reporters and journalists…   They hired a terrorist knowingly.

They have been labeled anti-semite, have had gag orders placed on them for releasing confidential information, and if that isn’t enough:

“The Guardian and its parent groups participate in Project Syndicate, established by George Soros.”

Aw shucks…  He does have the fingers of a million Octopi!

Politico, another Soros spearhead for ‘independent news’, continually derides Trump.  An impeachment article they ran April 17, 2016 calculates that such impeachment proceedings will be initiated by McCain, Graham, Pelosi, and Ryan. 

Nothing new here given they are all Soros wolves.  But the Pence allegation is clearly a shadow stab to derail and divide.  Not his style.