EU Commission: Gluttonous Spending

The EU Commission is embarking on a massive mission of garnering sought after revenue by suing major US companies including; Google, Amazon, Starbucks, Qualcomm and Apple. The woman behind the coup is Denmark’s, Margreth Vestager, a Socialist Liberal.   Vestager was the primary instigator in leveling a fine on Cyprus Airlines that ultimately resulted in their going bankrupt and the loss of 550 jobs.  By all accounts, she is – brutal.

The Google fine is heavy, weighing in at an astounding $5.1 billion as well as a demand that they change their business model to allow greater competition in the European market.  Whether this affects the share price is debatable, but the fact that the EU is specifically targeting US firms is of more interest as the Commission revenues have floundered and an appeal for funds is most likely the driving force, especially when BREXIT is finalized and 14 billion euro’s result in a significant shortfall.

The Trade War Behind The Trade War

This is not the first time the EU Commission has made headlines and enemies in trade disputes. IN 2004 Microsoft was ordered to pay $497 million which was the largest fine to date.  In 2006, they again attacked Microsoft and imposed an additional $448 million for competition violations.   And again in 2009 imposed $1.44 billion in fines.  And again in 2013, 561 million Euros.  In 2009, the EU Commission fined Intel $1.45 billion.

It would seem that the EU Commission is pocketing quite a bit of revenue from fines which, according to Article 83 of the EU Commission Protocol, are not reported as revenue but instead are held in a ‘special fund’ portfolio of high quality sovereign bonds with no designated purpose. 

In 2014, the Commission reported that of 70 separate fines imposed on various businesses, they collected $2.2 billion in ‘funds’.   In 2016, the EU Commission expenditures topped 136.4 billion Euros with roughly 8 billion going toward ‘Administration’.  Of course, it is important to note that administration is not an all inclusive of salaries and wages given that each sub-section absorbs costs that are ‘allocated’ to the specific project.   The two largest projects are;  Sustainable Growth Natural Resources, and Smart and Inclusive Growth which combined absorb over 90% of expenditures.

What the heck?

Smart and Inclusive Growth is supposedly targeting infrastructure and jobs in the least developed EU countries.   Sustainable Growth targets increased agriculture productivity.

In 2013, an external audit revealed that £109 billion out of a total of £117 billion spent by the EU in 2013 was “affected by material error”.  In fact, the audits for the previous 19 years all revealed similar deficits.  At the same time, the Commission was demanding additional sums from the UK in the amount of 1.7 billion creating  a havoc of hypocrisy and distrust.

The newly released budget for the Commission is slated at 1.14 trillion Euro.  The largest expenditure is applied to ‘foreign aid’ for countries wishing to become EU members – 123 billion Euros.

Given such an astronomical budget, what exactly has the EU Commission accomplished over it’s lifetime?

1)  It ratified the Paris Climate Accord

2)  It initiated the phasing out of export subsidies to allow poorer countries the opportunity to compete in agriculture

3)  It banished the death penalty

4)  It created a single market

5)  It ‘theoretically created open borders that meant passports were not necessary – although in reality due to the EU’s refuge and immigrant abject failures this open border policy is no longer being followed.

But most of the funding supports Research and studies that tackle various concerns including a project that determined cargo ships use less fuel than lorries, a mobile app to monitor weight loss, a publication of our galaxy, the design of an electric car for aging people, continuing research to expand renewable energy supply which now accounts for 5% of all energy output, and a project in which busses were subjected to a three year trial to determine if hydrogen fuel is a viable alternative…

While these projects all have relevance, it would seem the cost of funding the commission is rather extraordinary in comparison to the actual economic benefits achieved.

BY contrast, it would appear the US does not reciprocate in embarking in lawsuits against EU businesses that violate trade competition.

BREXIT, Theresa May’s Father, and Blackmail

Where the wind blows – so does Boris Johnson.  He has Brexited himself despite being against, for, and against, on any given day depending on where he will most likely get the most attention.   A man without ethics, he exited stage left before fulfilling the duties he had committed to – a summit on the Western Balkans.   That lack of integrity does define his honor.   But then he was never terribly committed to actually doing anything, he was following his own motley of money as he continued to botch just about everything he touched including a number of women he had affairs with. 

To think his resignation is anything but a breath of relief would be rather short sighted.   Plagued with a tongue that had no limits or boundaries, Mr. Johnson routinely bumbled his way through Parliament much like a bull in a china shop, requiring the deployment of a FT cleaner to sweep away the fragments of splintered china that he left behind.

He offended nearly everyone, lied, cheated, supported the devastation of Yemen while previously calling for the impeachment of Tony Blair for his support in the Iraq invasion.  He was the UK’s Maxine Waters with everyone wondering how the heck he managed to stay so long!

While the motivation for Johnson is questionable, the Theresa May bungling of BREXIT is truly remarkable.  In essence the soft deal is basically no BREXIT per se at all.   It is likely to be compared to Obamacare, “I guarantee you can keep your doctor and everyone will save at least $2500 per year” fiasco!

It’s a muckered down, waste of time and effort most likely composed by the Rothschilds given the demand for a re-vote didn’t fly.

What could cause May to cave to the will of the Rothschild cabal and the Swamp that infiltrated the UK decades ago?

This isn’t the only time Theresa May has surreptitiously botched an important issue upon taking office – the child sex abuse scandal reignited under her domain has just been quashed.   The main witness has now been charged with crimes including bringing false accusations, thus terminating the entire investigation which was targeting high up political and wealthy individuals, initially numbering over 1400.

And suddenly, just like that, they are all found ‘not guilty’.

Why would May allow the child sex scandal to flounder and completely shred?

Coverups and conspiracies ignite involving Chichester Diocese, All Saints of Eastbourne, Vicory House, St Barnabas in Bexhill and many others dating from as far back as the 1940’s.  Even those who were convicted in prior years served sentences that were ‘unholy’ by all definitions;   Father Keith Wilke Denford, convicted in 2013 for crimes dating 25 years prior – 18 months, Michael Mytton received a suspended nine month jail term.  Basically, a slap on the wrist.  A deal for keeping silent.

Theresa May’s father, Herbert Brasier, sought to avoid WWII and became a priest attending The Community of the Resurrection Seminary.  In years to come the Community of the Resurrection would become known for the systematic sexual abuse of children at the seminary by the Italian Verona brothers.

As the war produced more and more orphan refugees, many were sent to The Community of Mirfield where Theresa May’s father was then the vicar.  Mirfield and Resurrection were considered a tight knit group. A supply chain.

In 1953, Brasier was transferred to All Saints Hospital in Eastbourne where he presided as Chaplain.   He worked alongside Dr. John Bodkin Adams who was believed to have murdered upwards of 163 patients after having them change their wills and naming him as beneficiary.   Despite being labeled a bungler, falling asleep during operations, eating cakes and on multiple occasions injecting the wrong anaesthetic gas tube, he became the wealthiest doctor in Eastbourne.   Adams was ultimately charged with ‘one’ murder and acquitted by the presiding Judge, Sir Patrick Devlin whose wife Madeline was of the Oppenheimer family.   Multiple members of Parliament were said to be friends or lovers of Adams, thus his connections were vast and he was never convicted of murder or of theft.

It would seem that prior to Theresa May’s father marrying her mother who already had been diagnosed with MS, his postings routinely found him ensnared in the midst of and at the center of child abuse, sexual abuse and murder.   While little is known of him after May was born, the fodder for possible blackmail certainly seems a potential explanation for a whitewashing of web sources to research his life, and a Prime Minister who will do anything to keep her father’s name clear – including quashing the largest pedophilia case in the history of the UK.

And for her part, tit-for-tat, she will agree to uprooting and destroying BREXIT.

Theresa May & Sadiq Khan Failing Grade

London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, is allowing the blasphemous blimp depicting a baby Trump to fly across London when Trump meets for a summit with Theresa May and The Queen.   Khan has been blatheringly belligerent in his view of Trump since Trump proposed a temporary ban on all Middle East Immigration in 2015.  Despite Trump congratulating Khan on his win as mayor, Khan has upheld his contempt, and the feud continues.

So what has Khan accomplished during his tenancy as Mayor of London?

Stabbings are at an all time high, the murder rate is up 40% rivaling New York City, which is actually dropping, there is a spike in gun crimes, he has cut the number of police officers on the beat, he has closed youth centers, and eliminated the two strikes law.  And like Obama’s tenure, London has seen a tremendous rise in ‘hate crimes’.

Khan is anti BREXIT and decided to use government money to create a report that supports his conclusion: A no-deal BREXIT would leave the economy diminished and the people poorer.  That is the conclusion Khan asked for and the conclusion the report defined.  Apparently, the report makes future predictions that by 2030, Britain’s national income will be 3% less… if there is no transition agreement and no trade deal.

Basically, the report is based on a worst case scenario assuming that nothing changes, that the government caves to its inability to do anything whatsoever, and to a stagnant population with closing finance institutions.  Dire.

But is it reality?

Racism is on the rise in London during Khan’s tenure too.  At least that is what the media claim.  But is it true?  Or is it the same stoking we saw too often under the Obama administration to invite a belief until the belief was believed as truth?   Initiating chaos and having the government help promote, incite and provoke?

The Guardian is even taking the racism agenda a step beyond rationale claiming that BREXIT caused racism.  Of course there are other culprits in the cause of racism – capitalism and the far right.

But it isn’t just London that is currently a chaotic mess, the entire UK Parliament has come unhinged with eruptions resembling a junior high playground of bully fighting, fists and unfiltered tongues included.  The notion of the English Gentleman is most definitely a novelty of many years past. And yet these same brewhards and blowhards would hypocritically paint President Trump in an unglamorous fashion all the while failing miserably to account for his accomplishments in this past year and a half.

What has Theresa May accomplished?  Boris Johnson?  Anyone within the UK Parliament?   A list does not even exist.

What the UK has managed is the creation of a strange lot of laws:

1)  Muslims may pray on the streets individually or enmasse.  However, a man who read aloud from the Bible was arrested for inciting hate speech.

2)   MI6 helped create the Trump Dossier.

3)   The Skripal case against Russia was never proven, nor was the evidence released despite the accusation and the ultimate prosecution being finalized.

4)   The UK has banned entry, and/or jailed, activists who hold to an anti-Muslim opinion because their speech might cause Muslim’s to become violent.  This is akin to jailing the victim of a crime.

If in fact either Khan or May had a slew of amazing accomplishments behind them as Mayor and PM, their derisive attitude toward Trump might have some basis.  But given that Trump has infinite accomplishments to their none makes the entire snub rattily snotty.

Fake Political Party – a Chess Game

As the UK is beleaguered in the BREXIT divide, once again the Soros advocates are pushing protests and chaos calling for a ‘re-vote’.   The absurdity becomes laughable when we consider how this might play out.  It is reminiscent of Hillary demanding a re-vote when she lost.  I was a contender, I shoulda won! Therefore shoulda means we need a redo. Imagine the chaos if every year we had to do a  ‘redo’ of every vote the previous year?  Why bother voting?   As we see with BREXIT, it is not about moving forward after The People spoke, it is about two years of fighting about the outcome of the vote – and going nowhere.

The ridiculousness of the UK Parliament insubordination and ineptitude is framed in ‘not making a decision’ and instead voting agreeing that a decision will be deferred to a later time.  Two years have passed – and the latest vote was no exception.

These same ‘lawmakers’ who are truly incapable of actually making any political decision or decisive action, are quick to make sarcastic and defaming remarks about Trump as though they have lost every aspect of moral and ethical decorum.   In fact, their lacking decorum targets what they perceive to be Trump’s lacking decorum…

For example, what has Boris Johnson accomplished during his tenure?   

Well, he voted for the invasion of Iraq only later to demand Tony Blair’s impeachment for the UK’s collusion in invading Iraq.  He went to the Chinese Summer Olympics and offended his hosts.  He continued his journalism career while Mayor despite promising he would not.  He ended London’s oil deal with Venezuela and scrapped inspections of black cabs…  He was for BREXIT and against it and for it and against it.   Blowing wherever the wind blew him.  He has effectively done nothing for 15 years.

He has been hailed by The Economist for his decidedly liberal tendencies despite Johnson claiming he is a conservative.  The Economist is owned by the Rothschilds.

Boris Johnson is the UK’s implant of McCain.

The waters become more and more muddied as politicians are told to switch their affiliation in a subversive means of undermining the party.

Soros infiltrated US Republicans long ago, to think he hasn’t taken over the UK Parliament is short-sighted.  US Republicans that Soros has backed include:  McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John Boehner, Ed Royce, Charles Grassley, Ron Johnson, Cathy Rodgers and Dan Donovan.

ALL of these Republicans have either aggressively spoken out as anti-Trump or voted against his proposals including Iran, North Korea, trade, immigration, etc…

Colorado’s ultra-liberal, John Hickenlooper, and Ohio’s, John Kasich, are in discussion mode to form a ticket together in the 2020 presidential election.  In preparation, Kasich has been vocal about how successful and brilliant he is earning himself star appearances on liberal MSM outlets. He has also chosen to be rather disparaging of Trump regarding the detention of illegal children.

Many people vote by party, without researching anything at all.   So how can one discern who is a fake representative of their party?

More and more it is important to ‘follow the money’, because a politician who is pursuing an agenda, is a politician who has no ethic.  Of course, determining what that agenda is can also be rather difficult.   If the motive is to destabilize, to create chaos and division, that would be a first agenda.  If the MSM is supportive, that would indicate an approved agenda.

Adding to the fray is the hacking issues.   Today it was revealed that Wikileaks released the personal information of all ICE employees.  And so, the MSM has made it a Julian Assange terror attack.   But – what is the agenda?   In the midst of Trump’s zero tolerance for illegal immigration, taking down ICE would support the liberal agenda.  The obvious and logical conclusion is that WikiLeaks has been hacked, compromised.  Assange himself has been said to be in dire health, and the Ecuadorian embassy has said that ‘any communication’ would give them cause to expel him.

Whose agenda has it been for the last two years to take down Julian Assange?

Hillarygate.

She claimed that Wikileaks was partially responsible for her loss.

A party affiliation is meaningless any longer.   Follow the agenda.  Follow the money.  Kasich has penned a book… remind you of anyone else ramping up wealth in order to run for office?  Who else is writing a book?

G7 Summit Ruled by EU Commission

The G7 Summit is taking place in Quebec under the tutelage of Trudeau.   The purpose of the Summit is to talk about global topics chosen this year by Trudeau to include:  ocean pollution, trade tariffs, and climate change.  The Summit was originally created in 1973 by George Schulz.  It was to be attended by the finance ministers of four countries;  West Germany, UK, US and France.  It has historically evolved to include Canada, Italy, Japan, and Russia, although Russia was expelled in 2014.  

The President’s of these countries basically get together, have some food, meander around the property, and talk.  The only spouse to accompany her husband was Macron’s.  After two days, they go home and nothing changes.  From the perspective of a businessman, it is a huge waste of time.  From the perspective of the various politicians attending it gives them airtime. For Macron, it gives him hug time.

For example, in February 2009, the group of finance ministers met in Rome and pledged to take all necessary steps to stem the financial crisis.  That was the sum total of the meeting.  Seems to me a phone call could have accomplished that at a considerable fraction of the cost.

But it has become a media hype and everyone wears their Sunday best.  Furthering division, the summit conspicuously omits other global countries; Ireland, India, Scotland, The Netherlands, China, Russia, Spain, Portugal, Brazil, etc.., etc…  Instead it is more of a good ol’ boy platform wherein tradition is the only rationale.

The end result of this meeting seems to be that Trump and the EU will talk about trade in two weeks. Macron thinks the US should be expelled from future summits.  And as representative for ALL EU countries, Merkel stated that they all agree Russia should remain expelled.  I wonder if the ‘other countries’ were notified of their agreement before or after her statement?

Apparently, the new PM of Italy, Giuseppe Conte, stated that he felt Russia should be reinvited. However, the EU Council President, Donald Tusk, speaking on behalf of Conte said that Italy would toe the line and be a follower, not a leader.  I wonder if Conte is royally miffed!

Why would the EU Commissioner and EU Council President be at the G7?  They are not countries. 

In 1977, the UK PM, James Callahan, made the unilateral decision to henceforth include the EU Council and EU Commission as a part of the summit.  Supposedly, Juncker and Tusk are there as a united front to represent the remaining EU countries that are not invited.  Why?   Why not let sovereign nations speak for themselves?   Because in reality they are not sovereign, their voice is censored.

If the G7 Summit is really about the EU, and given Canada is a parcel of the Queen of England, why would the US or Russia have any desire to participate?  Both Tusk and Juncker are representatives of ‘open society’ and globalization.   They have collectively taken over the Summit which was originated in the US.

After losing a re-election bid in Poland, Tusk became the EU Council President.   He has since been openly accusatory that the current President of Poland and his conservative party are puppets of Putin.  In addition, he claims that the EU values are quite polar opposite from the values of Poland under conservatism and nationalism. In 2017, Juncker initiated an investigation into the President and his Party claiming ‘judicial independence concerns’.  

The bottom line is the fact that according to the EU any country that is not governed by a Socialist Party towing the line of the EU ‘values’, is operating under a fascist government and sanctions will be levied including being stripped of voting rights.

Hungary is also facing potential sanctions by the EU for their stance on conservatism.   Hungary has come under attack for expelling Soros and refusing to bow to the EU demands for African immigrant quotas.

Slovakia is facing condemnation for similar stances.

BREXIT is meaningless as long as Theresa May continues to be a pawn of MI6 and the Merkel.  What is more relevant is the growing number of countries that are standing up to the Royal Arm of the EU Commission and Council who tend to act much like the Wizard of Oz – behind a red curtain.

Which country in the EU will be next?

FACEBOOK’s Whistleblower; Wylie Coyote BLOWS

A Canadian, Christopher Wylie, has come forth as the ‘whistleblower’ behind the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica dispute. His profile is sketchy, interesting, and doesn’t quite make sense…fit:

 

1) He left school at 16 without graduating. 2) He claims to have worked on the campaign of Liberal would be politician, Michael Ignatieff at 17.   3) Between 18 and 20 he claims to have learned everything he knows under the tutelage of President Obama’s, “National Director of Targeting’ (there is no such agency). 4) Despite having no high school degree, he claims to have gone to the London School of Economics to study law at the age of 20.   5)   He has a Twitter account that states it was opened in 2016, however, it has a handful of ‘tweets’, all of which were produced March 2018.   6)   While in the UK he began working for the Liberal Party in ‘voter targeting’. 7)   With no degrees, he became Director of Research at Cambridge Analytica.   8)   He gave The Guardian information about the alleged data mining in March 2017 – but nothing was said until March 2018.

He is most definitely ‘enjoying’ his recent fame.

So how is it that an obvious pro-Libeal, Obama studded young guy with no education came to be the Director of Research at a very conservative organization?

He claims that his Liberal Democrat friends helped him get the Analytica job in 2013… He claims a personal relationship with Bannon and the Mercers, and yet, he is no one…

The primary funders of Analytica were the Mercers who were also part owners in Breitbart and Renaissance Technologies, a hedge fund.   They are decidedly Conservative.

SCL Group, the parent company of Analytica, apparently also had contracts with the British government which expired and were not renewed by Theresa May.   In addition, they had contracts with the US Defense Department, prior to Trump.   They have been used as a propaganda tool by numerous corporations and governments in Africa, Asia, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, and Latin America.

His most recent claim is the notion that BREXIT was corrupted by his company’s meddling.   What he fails to mention is the fact that George Soros was instrumental in funding the anti-BEXIT campaign. So why isn’t Soros being ‘regulated’? 

Soros NGO’s have been a dominant meddler in media spin, propaganda spin, and corruption for decades, and yet an allowance was given within the Liberal Parties across the globe… because he used his data to their benefit. When Trump used the same analytics, suddenly the Wolves cried ‘UNFAIR’.

Why aren’t the UK and US governments being brought under scrutiny for their role in election meddling across the globe?

And why is the word of this one person, a die hard liberal with an agenda to pick, taken as the gospel truth without further evidence gathering? 

And why is it not discussed that all this took lace under the Obama and Cameron administrations?

And given that Facebook was a party to the Liberal agenda of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, in conjunction with Google, why isn’t she held accountable?

What makes this different is the alleged use of Facebook. But Merkel uses Facebook to censor information in Germany?   How is this different?   Facebook censors itself…   and typically conservative news is the victim. So how is this different?

As has been reported by The Guardian, who led the Analytica story, there are many more companies doing the exact same thing for different campaigns across the globe.   Using computer modeling they simply tap into the frustrations of a class of people and use their frustrations to create slogans and content for the politicians to enhance in speeches. Actually, its not that much different than dressing for the part – remember Nixon vs Kennedy?

Obama utilized these tactics to win his election in 2012…   but no one considered it a crime, in fact, he was lauded for his savvy!

Obviously, Wylie Coyote is a hyped front for the more sinister desire to shut down the conservative voice from Facebook, and other social media platforms given that the MSM has already been devoured by the Big Bad Wolf!

Generally something smells because it stinks.

TRADE WAR: TTIP and The Global Agenda

Isolating the UK from trade with Russia and the US means they become a groveling dependent of the EU.

Obama openly declared in 2016 that there was absolutely no way that the US would open trade with the UK because the EU took precedence.

EU Council President, Donald Tusk, believes this is the perfect time to reintroduce TTIP claiming that it will solve all the tariff issues within the EU, UK and US…

TTIP is the largest ever trade initiative ever negotiated or proposed – and its contents are completely ‘classified’ we the public have no right to know what it involves, we are told how great it will be and how economically productive. What we do know comes from leaked documents which establish as a goal, universalism. This would mean that the US would effectively become an EU state subject to EU laws, regulations, banking and insurance restrictions at the discretion of a universal EU appointed Tribunal.

One of the more threatening aspects of TTIP is that it gives corporations power over nations. A corporation could sue a nation for failing to perform according to the corporate standards. As such, nations and their governments would be squeezed out and corporate CEO’s would become absolute powers.

In 1933, Musolini declared that he envisioned a corporatism world in which the state governments ‘serve the corporations’.   Renamed Globalization, the concept was later re-introduced by Democrat, George Ball, who claimed that nation states and sovereignty were obsolete. A founding member of the Bilderberg Group, Ball and Rockefeller have been active proponents of creating this new corporate sovereign rule.

TTIP fills this Communist agenda.

Most of the staid countries within the EU are aligned with the Socialist Party.   A shift by the Eastern Bloc toward a more nationalistic view has been infesting the landscape and disrupting the rule of order.   Alienating the UK from trade partners including Russia and the US would have the effect of hitting them where it most hurts in BREXIT and bringing them to their proverbial knees – once again.

Macron’s “En Marche” party was supposedly inspired by Obama, but that would mean that Obama was more than a puppet. In fact, the corporate elites have been behind Italy’s Five Star Movement as well as En Marche as they devised a methodology of moving from Socialism to Communism through Media propaganda.   Thus the New Centrist, is really Communism in disguise.

Before Macron was a “Centrist” he was a Socialist.   Before Merkel was a Democrat, she was a Socialist.   Italy, Austria, Spain, Portugal, Norway, and Switzerland are entirely Socialist.   Giving way to the Rand philosophy of Corporatism is a natural evolution.

In the meantime, Soros has made a fervent call to the EU to regulate social media content, and censor dissenting views… although in his terms it is to “fight populism”.   But wait! The Definition of Populism is: A political philosophy to support the rights and power of the people in their struggle against privilege elite.  

And no one noticed. Censorship on a multinational level is in line with Communism.

BREXIT gave rise to multi-level problems with trade, communism, and the fight against sovereignty.   Trump aggravated the agenda.   Putin was already considered an enemy of the globalization movement when he issued an arrest warrant for Soros and banned all his NGO’s from Russia.

Reeling in each country meant isolating them from trade. Trade was the tool.

So, has Trump inadvertently leaped on the trade band wagon – or is he establishing his own negotiating tactics.

In the end, the script is rather well written.   And the players perfectly cloned. But there are a few good men… and I think I’ll place my trust in them.

The EU: A New Ottoman Empire!

In light of BREXIT and Trump’s stance on the less than transparent UN, Juncker is making a bid to find alternate states to bring under the EU umbrella.

Macedonia:   With a population that is roughly 64% Christian and 33% Muslim, Macedonia is a fitting choice to add to the debt of the EU.   It’s unemployment rate is 27-30% and its poverty rate is in excess of 22%.   It’s newly elected Prime Minister, Zoran Zaev of the Social Democrat Union, is mired in more than a bit of controversy as he was charged with conspiracy with ‘a foreign intelligence service’ in initiating a coup against the previous Prime Minister. His squeaky election win was further underscored by the fact that the previous PM was part of the VMRO-DPMNE Party which is considered ‘nationalist’.

Albania:   Roughly 60% of the population is Muslim.   It has the 10th largest reserves of oil, and is the worlds leading exporter of chromium which is used as an anti-corrosive in steel plating. Albania is considered a prime tourist destination for southern Europeans and US citizens. Unemployment is roughly 15%, it operates a trade deficit of -9.7%. It’s PM, Edi Rama, is a member of the Socialist Party.

Bosnia:   Cited as 51% Muslim, the country is loosely defined as a liberal democracy. Despite this tag, “…the highest political authority in the country is the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the chief executive officer for the international civilian presence in the country and is selected by the European Union. Since 1995, the High Representative has been able to bypass the elected parliamentary assembly, and since 1997 has been able to remove elected officials. The methods selected by the High Representative have been criticized as undemocratic.   International supervision is to end when the country is deemed politically and democratically stable and self-sustaining.

In essence, the country is ruled by the EU.

It’s infrastructure and economy have yet to recover from the Bosnian/Croatian war that ended in 1995. Main industries include steel, coal and iron ore.   Its unemployment rate is near 40%, and it requires IMF loans simply to survive.

Kosovo: Approximately 96% Muslim, Kosovo’s status as a nation is subject to controversy. Like Bosnia, it has yet to sustain itself since the Yugoslavia war that ended in 1995.   Rich in agriculture, the country boasts 53% of its land use for the production of agri-products, and 41% a forestry. The current PM, Ramush Haradinaj, served in the Kosovo war and although he was indicted for war crimes, no charges were implemented.

Montenegro: The newly elected Prime Minister, Dusko Marcovic, is a member of the Democratic Socialists, not unlike Macedonia’s political metamorphosis. A tiny nation that was also created as a result of the Yugoslav war, its main industry is tourism. While in need of major investment within infrastructure to increase the revenue basis of this industry, Montenegro is a recipient of Climate Change funds with the approval of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The Baltic State Region, recognized as developing countries who are at the greatest risk of global warming, have been targeted for Climate Change funding according to the Paris Accord in order to mitigate these potentially catastrophic events…

In essence, all of this means that we have a bunch of Baltic countries whose nominal GDP per capita ranges from a low $3200 to about $6200, whose economies are in desperate need of a boost in monetary investment, preferably free, whose ethnicities are either largely or predominantly Muslim, who belong to the Socialist/Communist leaning political spectrum, and whose land bears fertile usage, wherein a solution was concocted in which a fake moral and ethical agenda of climate change was created, funded with private and global government donated money via the Paris Climate Accord and the UN, that would then be diverted to these economies for rebuilding and infrastructure spending so as to reinvent viable economies to be integrated into the EU, with the ultimate goal of recreating a New Ottomon Empire, which coincidentally was the stated goal of ISIS and Al-Nusra. In the meantime, the citizens of the EU extend welcoming arms unaware that their own ethnicities will soon become the minority and their lives uprooted and displaced. All under the guise of Merkel and Juncker who seemingly are aglaze in a false belief of arrogant power, indoctrinated into trusting that they will be tasked with a leading power role over this New Ottoman Empire, while childishly unaware that they are mere puppets who are ultimately quite expendable…

 

BREXIT Poll: The Independent

A British media presence which is described as tremendously ‘Liberal’ despite its rather oblique name, The Independent, has conducted its very own poll which has been picked up by the mainstream media in which it claims that over half of the UK now opposes BREXIT.   This same non-Independent routinely teams with Al Jazeera in promoting news briefs and articles. In 2008 it relaunched itself from its status as a ‘Tabloid’ and began attempting to report – actual news.

And this ‘Poll’ is completely – Independent…

Of course its connection to Al Jazeera a Qatari media front, is further supported by the fact that the principle owner of The Independent is Sultan Muhammad Abjljadayel, a Saudi businessman. It is further revealed that Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel works for NCB Capital, the investment banking arm of the National Commercial Bank, which is controlled by the Saudi government and is one of the biggest banks in the Middle East.

Al Jazeera was formed by the former Qatari Emir, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, who overthrew his father as Emir, who overthrew his cousin. He attended the Royal British Military Academy, as did his son – who is now the current Emir of Qatar.

As in – All In The Family – Britain first…

The other two owners of the Non-Independent are a Russian father and son team, Lebedev. Alexander Lebedev’s parents were both Russian intelligentisia, and Alexander was former KGB assigned to London. Alexander Lebedev is also part owner of the Russian paper, Novaya Gazeta, which supports Liberalism, an anti-Putin regime, and is affiliated with the New York Times; they have an agreement to publish selected articles translated into Russian.

It would also appear that Lebedev has financial assets in the Ukraine and specifically Crimea which came under attack by former President Yanukovich for allegations of tax evasion prior to the coup.

The other independent news outlet owned by Lebdeved is the London evening Standard, which is billed as a tabloid and is free.

The point? Contrary to the rant of David Cameron claiming that Democracy is at stake when Trump exposes fake journalism, the media is sorely NOT Independent. It has long been exploited and used as a tool to subvert Democracy and to wield a heavy hand in creating a staged world.

The same David Cameron ‘pretended’ to be a conservative until elected whereupon he began to implement his ‘progressive liberal’ positions. The same Cameron whose wealth was hidden in offshore accounts as exposed by the Panama Paper Caper. The same David Cameron who is chairman for The National Citizen Service, an organization created by Cameron while Prime Minister, funded by the UK government, and has been under tremendous criticism since it’s inception as a Big Society format within a purely Socialist ideology that sounds a bit too close to the Soros placard of Open Society…

And so – The Independent poll conducted by the Non-Independent news media has about as much truth to it as the … Mueller hypocrisy…mess.

BREXIT -Burned By Soros

BREXIT –  BRIN –  BREXIT — BRIN  ???

They are out! They are in! They are safe! They are ruined! The pound is up! It is down… It is up – and down and turning all around – Mother May I – Theresa?

Brother. Bother. UK’s Theresa May, Help!

Parliament must vote on whether the UK can start the initiation of Article 50 in leaving the EU. The government is appealing. The people’s vote doesn’t count. And a stalled process only makes the entire fiasco a mockery of justice, and The People.

So who is behind this stall? Mz Gina Miller – an investment manager, Deir Dos Santos – a hairdresser, and the People’s Challenge group, set up by Grahame Pigney, an expat living in France, and backed by a crowd-funding campaign. Not exactly a stellar bunch of heavy weights…

Who is Mz Gina Miller? The wife of investment guru Alan Miller who came aboard New Star Hedge Fund and was wooed by Soros. Shortly after Alan’s initiation, Soros was dangling an opportunity – $100 million in investment management potential which would amount to a 40% initial startup investment stake. The fund is based in Bermuda to avoid taxes.  No surprise.  Two years later, in 2003, New Star brought on two former fund managers from Soros Fund Management, Sajid Ramzan and Chris Beton.  I’d say Soros has a say in the fund’s operations. Since their initial founding the fund has reaped billions. Thank you Soros.

Enter BREXIT and A favor deserves A favor.

Soros has been openly opposed to Brexit.  Tapping one of New Star’s partners, Gina Miller, to do his bidding would explain how she could exert the influence she has over the entire judiciary and parliament of the UK despite the fact that she is nobody.

Then there is Grahame Pigney whose LinkedIn site recognizes Gina Miller as an associate. How would he know Gina, he’s an expat living in France?   How can a vote that has been decided by the People – be contested by a couple of wealthy operators?  Lord Thomas who is presiding over the case brought by Miller is a member of the European Law Institute which is considered a Soros Open Society apparatus since its founding. And so the circle is complete.  Soros has organized a fight.

Miller, New Star, Lord Thomas, Grahame Pigney, the entire exploiters of the anti-BREXIT vote, are now attempting to uproot the voters via pressure from Soros.

What say you UK? Who is your Master?

You, The People, have a say, have rights, have the power, if you choose. And like the US, you can rise up against the shadows and just say – NO! Because, our world, our history, and our future are at stake. And that’s worth fighting for!