Europe’s Female Leaders: Merkel, May, Wallstrom – Femme Fatale FAILURES

Germany continues its attempt to vilify Trump while treading lightly as they dip their pinky toes into a possible recession at the making of their Socialist, Communist government. 

The Socialist liberals don’t like Trump’s wall, they hailed Obama’s ‘fence wall’, which was erected for the same purpose, but side with Pelosi in regard to the anti-humanitarianism a wall evokes.   Of course, they did nothing about the Berlin Wall which was created as a prison to keep people in – as opposed to keeping illegals – out.  It was the US under Reagan that brokered the fall of the Berlin Wall to allow free access among nationalized Germans.

But it isn’t about the wall, it isn’t about humanitarianism, it is about demonizing Trump in light of the reformed Socialist failure toward globalization with Germany at the helm.

Theresa May has informed her closest advisor that she will be resigning this summer two years early amidst the debacle of failing to bring about an organized BREXIT negotiation. Of course, she was the pawn of all pawns in this chess game, expendable, her dignity and respect in an utterly deplorable shambles.  Perhaps she went into this fusion of chaos with ‘eyes wide shut’, but I doubt it, and if she had, certainly she is leaving having completely disgraced the UK and herself, while quite possibly creating a spectacular ‘deplorable’ Fall.  Without shame, without compassion or a voice for her people, her legacy will be an engraving on her headstone, and Les Miserables may be invoked.

Merkel too is likely to leave amidst a deplorable escalation of crime, lacking negotiating tacticals, and an economy that is nose diving radically.  But perhaps that is – the game for the EU.   An economy, a society, must be destroyed before one can truly rule it within a globalized fashion of dictatorship – Hitler was Germany’s own example.  Bringing down the stalwarts;  France, Germany and the UK, would spiral the entire EU aligned countries.

Sweden’s Deputy Prime Minister, Wallstrom,  a self declared ‘feminist’, serves the criminals at the expense of her own women and girls, leaving them without support or retribution in a land that has spiraled into the soulless depths of rape, assault, bombs, fires, and  crime.

These are the women of the EU.  These are the female models – the humanitarians?

Germany’s Deutsche Welle media outlet, a government catered institution much like the Washington Post, prints scathing opinions and articles defiantly anti-Trump while embracing the likes of Pelosi, who would seemingly be wishing, ‘mother may I please’ become President of the US at the ripe age of 80.

Today, DW’s US correspondent, Michael Knigge, would have the audacity to site an argument against Trump declaring a state of emergency to fund the wall given that ‘the US has been in a perpetual state of emergency’ since 1979, which is actually a story drudged up in 2014 during Obama’s reign of terror.   Of course the fact that Germany was the causal force that took the globe into WWI and WWII seems to elude this author.   Perhaps we should delve into the Bolshevik revolution instigated by Germans seeking to overthrow the Russian Monarchy.  Or the 500 year long Germanic invasions of the Roman Empire?

Knigge goes on to ‘ad nauseum’ Pelosify himself as being in alignment with this liberal Socialist who has seemingly garnered a wealth of over $200 million through self-seeking contracts given to her husband, a VISA scam, and insider trading tactics used by herself and infinite other politicians to exploit the system and line their pockets.

In essence, Most, if not all, of Trump’s most vicious critics are angry because he is winning, because their tight apple-cart just got ransacked and dumped, because in all their infinite glory representing an army of 100,000, they still can’t beat one man – Trump!

WHOAH!

Germany and France: Fake a Military Alliance…

Germany and France have announced joint plans to build a, as in one, fighter jet, in their ‘ambitious new defense strategy’.  This one jet may be ready within – two years… or more because first they have to create a ‘concept study for a shared air combat system’, and the study may require two years to complete.

The construction for this fighter jet is a combined effort between Germany’s Airbus and France’s Dassault although funding is an issue and the respective governments are looking for outside ante’s.   Airbus’ military chief, Fernando Alonso, has stated that simply buying a bunch of US made F35’s would be a much less expensive alternative but such a purchase would greatly impact Europe’s sovereignty.   What?

Suddenly, it would appear that Europe has decided it will adopt the anti-Trump agenda of sovereignty – they just won’t announce it to the people.  In fact, the cost of this monstrosity unmanned fighter jet has also been kept under wraps given the tenuous budgets of France and Germany are already squeezed by trade issues and immigration welfare.

What they have announced is a $75 million budget to be shared by Dassault and Airbus to develop the ‘architecture and manufacturing structure’ for the project.  Essentially, it is a committee fee that may or may not determine if the project is even feasible.  And in essence, the spending does little to nothing to advance Europe’s military, and may be a smoke screen or deflection from the fact that their NATO ante remains in the twalette. Previous collaborations have proven quite embarrassing as differing opinions created vast disparities and eventually entire projects crumbled with nothing to show for the $$$$.

Of course, this time will be different.

While Macron made the demand that the venture not include bidding from US Lockheed Martin in order to maintain ‘sovereign rule’, the fighter jet will be fitted with US Nuclear Bombs.  So I guess sovereign only means – sometimes.

But they need to do something given their defense ministers have whispered the fact that most of their current inventory is obsolete or in dire need of costly repairs.

While Trump demanded that the EU countries ante up their fair share of military spending per the NATO Agreement, they have been reluctant.

NATO was created to defend European countries from a “Russia invasion”.   Canada, Turkey and the US came on board after the fact.   Russia came aboard briefly but NATO ejected them after the Ukraine coup.   Like a good deal of the Federal government, NATO has become a nonessential burgeoning expense propped up by the US and a handful of EU countries to conduct military exercises.  While NATO has been an alliance in Afghanistan, and the first Gulf War, it is now mostly relegated to ‘protecting civilians in north Africa’.   Why?  Why is NATO protecting countries that aren’t a part of NATO?

A quick perusal of the NATO site indicates their current projects to be a handful of meetings, shaking hands, and discussing security while taking jaunts to Romania, Slovakia, Macedonia, Kosovo, London and Brussels.   Of course no organization would be complete without creating a sub-feature that addresses ‘equality for women’, as in NATO is now a sponsor for protecting women’s rights.  AH!

Of course the blatantly obvious question in all this military discussion is why are Germany and France creating their own military instead of anteing up their fair share for NATO?   Unless they too believe that NATO has become superfluous.

Time Magazine has an answer: Their justification for the fair share debacle is because the 2% of GDP is simply a ‘guideline’, not mandatory. And therefore, Germany, France and most of the EU are within their right to give NATO money – or not, in any denomination they feel like.   Therefore if a country, such as the US, decided to ante nothing, we would be within that same ‘guideline’ rule.   By George I’ve GOT IT!

It is the same rule that the Paris Climate Accord created, i.e., ‘a guideline’ that neither Germany or France have ever met, and don’t intend to meet in the near future, although a 30 year agenda sounds good because Merkel and Macron will be long gone by then sitting on a beach drinking Mai Tai’s.

I wonder if the $39 billion BREXIT bill is a ‘guideline’?  Given that contracts are not really binding, and $$$ aren’t really available, and rules aren’t really governable?  And organizations are really superfluous… conducting occasional meetings, flying hither and there… while Kosovo ‘peacekeepers’ are really volunteers, but they are multi-ethnic, lightly armed, professional and support the UN.  But Kosovo is not a member of NATO, so why is NATO even there?    I ramble.

Bottom line, France and Germany are trying to give the impression they are doing something constructive toward building a military when in fact what they have is completely unusable, would offer no protection to the people, and they don’t have the money to create a military defense – so instead, they have created a committee to evaluate the construction of a jet and held lots of photo ops to impress the media with a proposal/guideline of a jet that is way too expensive, and they can’t afford.

But it isn’t mandatory…

BREXIT: The 39billion Pound Bomb

With 39billion pounds on the line, it is no wonder the EU Commission doesn’t much care if BREXIT goes forward with No Deal.   When in doubt, follow the money. 

While the UK ranks third in total contributions/membership fees to the EU, Net Contributions have ranged between 4.7billion pounds to 10.756 billion pounds. Thus with 39 billion on the line, it would take roughly 4-5 years to break-even, assuming a $0 interest rate.  The problem?  The UK has operated on a budget deficit for largely 65+ years with few exceptions, the most radical deficits occurring during the 2008 financial meltdown.

Problem?  The UK doesn’t have 39 billion pounds to give to the EU.

With the EU Commission facing a shortage of funds given the probability of BREXIT, at this point, taking 39 billion and running for the nearest tax free haven would not seem a bad idea.  It would also give them the necessary time to schmooze alternate countries into the Union such as Turkey and the Baltics to counter the lost annual revenue from a UK exit.

Given the recent whisper meeting between Juncker and Theresa May that may be exactly what was desired all along.

Theresa May has been in office since 2016.  In the UK the term of office is five years, ending 2021 which coincides with Merkels’ and is a year shy of Macron’s 2022 term end.  However, none of these officials are remotely popular and their stand-down, resignation has been called for by The People.  Theresa May could exit early if the BREXIT debacle doesn’t resolve according to the Will of The People.  But, I doubt she really cares.   Her legacy is already twalette water.

In contrast, The People in the US have not called for Trump’s resignation, that call has rigidly been made by DC Swamp reptilians from the Democrat and Republican Parties who see their Deep State monetary and power vacuum being sucked into oblivion.

The UK and Germany GDP growth rates hovering in the 1% category would put them on par with Haiti and Azerbaijan, ranking in the bottom 30 of 193 countries.   Not exactly a success story to write home to mama.  Women unite?   Hardly.

The Show, of course, the choreographed in-fighting, was likely staged and rehearsed two years ago with a scripted Act I, II and III resolving in nothing but chaos.  The implication that anyone in the UK Parliament actually gave a rats ass, is quickly waning.  They didn’t, don’t never have.

In the end, The Swamp that controls the UK, is likely speckled with layers of appointments as to who will be the lackey of the week ridiculed in the press, only to have that honor shift to the next idiot whose finances are secured in the offshore camps of various Panama Accounts awaiting the fall so that they can at last escape into their umbrella cocktails and mermaid prostitutes oblivious to the crash of proletariat servants.

May and Merkel will skulk into the sunset of their ever shrinking geriatric years on this earth, and Macron will be left, the lone wolf, flailing desperately as the tide breeches and he raises an arm to the sky, “Sacre Bleu!”  and disappears into the diaspora.

They are all dispensable in the globalist scheme, and they know it.   All they want is their island lifestyle to eclipse their dreams and make destroying their own countries, their homeland, worth it.

Meanwhile, a lone Trump is fighting beyond human comprehension to sustain The Politicians that abhor him in the US, to rise above the reptilian and piranha razing of flesh, and recreate a world wherein The People reign.  

Theresa May: Terminal BREXIT

Theresa May has spent her entire term in office as Prime Minister of the UK trying and failing to implement BREXIT.  Nothing else at all marks her tenure of the last 2 ½ years.  And still, the supposed deal she executed that was approved by the EU but not her constituents or the people, will likely fail. 

The ‘Deal’ still demands the UK be on the hook with the EU to ante up $39 billion for the privilege of exiting.  Trade and borders will remain unaffected.  Migration will likely increase as May has announced that she will vote to uphold the UN migration pact.  And in the end, the only change will be the ante!

Of course that doesn’t include the annual cost to the UK of the ‘negotiations’ which has been estimated to be about 26 billion pounds.  Financial experts have stated that if Parliament fails to approve the current deal the pound will tank upwards of 25%.  Sounds a bit like the last tanking initiated under the guidance of George Soros when the Bank of England – tanked, September 16, 1992.

Did Soros short the pound again?

Since 2014, the UK GDP growth rate has continued to drop.  The pedophilia scandal that was purported to involve over 1400 perpetrators and hundreds of thousands of victims – has stalled.  UK crime rates have been on an uptick spike since 2014. The jobs market and earnings growth have dropped.

And Theresa May has spent every single moment of her time in office wearily defeated by the gamers who drew her into the web of BREXIT manipulation.  One might feel sorry for her if she were simply a victim, but she chose her allies and bartered the UK.

The European Union, the UN, do the bidding of Soros and the Rothschilds.  If a country chooses to defy either, Soros will seek vengeance, create sanctions, and undermine law and the economy.  As national conservatives in the EU take root, ramping up antagonist moves becomes more and more a priority for the Soros/Rothschild Cabal.   Fake information has become the tagline target as everything anti EU, everything anti-Soros, everything anti-Socialism is targeted as fake information.

Even Facebook has become a target as Soros demands the resignation of Zuckerberg from this mega-conglomerate that has reached an astonishing value estimated to be over $500 billion and utilized by roughly 2.3 billion people monthly.  Of course Soros wants control of this power.  From his perspective, Zuckerberg is a peon, worthless in his game of thrones.

The question remains, if in fact Soros anticipates BREXIT will fail and the pound will tank, that would also mean he has no more use for the UK as an economy.

In the game of chess, the moves are never random, they are thought out with a future checkmate preconceived.  All the pieces are aligned, the opponents moves calculated instinctively.  Theresa May had no chess game, she simply moved her pawns randomly in one failed directive, BREXIT, while the queen, bishops, and horsemen yawned.

If BREXIT fails again as predicted, what would be the outcome for The People?

Despite calls for the UK citizens to vote on the BRXIT deal, May has refused citing time.  Time.  Is that not an age old ploy utilized by politicians in their eye rolling game? Delay until anxiety is so high the people will accept anything…

While the people of Germany have succumbed to Socialism, the people of the UK have succumbed to the Lords of chaos.  Ultimately, both will suddenly awaken and fight for their lives and salvation only to realize that too is all part of the chess game.

BREXIT was a deflection. It gave hope wherein the hope would not be attained, at least not within the same frame that it was created.

The only way to rise above the chessmen is to understand the game, see the reality of who is good and who is evil, and join forces with the likes of William Wallace.  Freedom!   He may have been a Scotsman, but he represents all men who fight for their country!

Globalization: UK & Hungary Core Socialist NGO’s For NWO

In 2015, a UK based NGO, Statecraft, created an adjunct subsidiary, “Integrity Initiative”. Their stated purpose is to counter disinformation according to their perception:  “This international project brings together in a network of clusters across Europe and North America people who understand the threat posed to Western nations by a flood of disinformation, deception and lies which is being put out by those opposed to Western concepts of liberalism, freedom and democracy.”

“Members of the Integrity Initiative clusters actively engage with policy-makers and the wider public in their own countries to show them the damage which can be done to their societies by disinformation. They also share information and experience across the region to help society to understand the varied and pernicious nature of the threat and to counter it.”

These NGO’s are:  anti-Trump, anti-Russia, pro vaccine, anti-new Italian President, pro-Mueller, support media literacy classes in American schools, and purport to teach how to identify false propaganda.  In their report, ‘Identifying Disinformation: An ABC Approach’, they use an interesting example:  During the Syrian War the Russian Defense Ministry issued a statement that they would be conducting airstrikes targeting ISIS.  According to Integrity Initiative the statement was false because in fact according to satellite imagery, the airstrikes hit two ‘moderate’ opposition groups fighting Assad including:  AJaish al-Tawhid and Tajamu al-Aaza.   But Tawhid was a violent group that called for radical Sharia Law and was affiliated with The Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda. 

Obviously – the disinformation group is grossly misinformed…or perhaps, they are somewhat more sinister.

The identity of the members of this transparent information organization are not available as they claim their lives might be in jeopardy and thus they wish to remain anonymous.

However, they provide an interesting host of Partners with which Integrity Initiative is affiliated, including:  The Beacon Project, a group of psychologists who aim to seek the ‘morally exceptional’ and specifically endeavor how to improve moral character.  Public Opinion Research Unit, an organization that provides material for major news networks in Greece and abroad in cooperation with other NGO’s, including Braincandy – which decodes human behavior.  CEPA, whose Senior VP was formerly a senior editor at the Rothschild media outlet, The Economist.   European Values, a think tank that fights extremist ideologies, publically ridicules anyone they believe are pro-Russia, and supports Liberal Democracy. Merkel has zealously proclaimed that she supports ‘European Values’.   While it has been assumed she was referring to actual small-case values, it would align that she was referencing this NGO.

Of course, no Liberal campaign is complete without a source that directs back to George Soros Open Society Foundation.   Given his adamant hatred of everything Russia and Putin, and his desperate demise thereof, Soros inevitably rises to the surface.  In this case it is through another affiliate of Integrity Initiative, Political Capital, an NGO based in Hungary – the home of Soros.  It is this thread that provides the web and implicates not just the UK but Germany as well as the source of manipulation, behavior modification, and mind control through MSM.

  • The list of partners in association with Political Capital is a Who’s Who of Globalization. Enormously revealing, they include;  Chatham House, German Marshall Fund of the US(in affiliation with Brzezinski, Albright, Wolfgang Schaubel, Robert Gates, Erdogan, etc…) Visegrad/Insight, Atlantic Council, Progressive Alliance of Socialists & Democrats in European Parliament, European Values (full circle), European Jewish Fund, Academy of Media, National Endowment For Democracy (whose current President, Carl Gershwin, formerly served as Executive Director of Social Democrats USA), King Baudouin Foundation, etc…

In essence these NGO’s espouse Socialism and are utilizing their script to dictate business, political, and media responses within that ideology.  The pure Democrat is a fast fade exiting stage left – Socialism is the agenda for it is well understood it is the only gateway to establish Globalization and A New World Order within the doctrine of Marxism.

Political Capital also lists two individual donor partners, Zoltán Somogyi, whose expertise is AI, and Krisztián Szabados, whose expertise is ‘transhumanism’, a philosophical movement to enhance human intellect and physiology, including the creation of super soldiers, liberalism, immortality and a dystopian society.  Szabados, attended the Corvinus University of Budapest, formerly called Karl Marx University.

We now unravel a vast network of UK, US and Hungarian NGO’s aligned with Socialism, espousing Karl Marx, and working fervently to create a ‘super human’ biologically and intellectually, most likely with the use of AI implants, to rule the New World Order.

Political Capital also does research for Facebook and Twitter to identify extremist organizations and far right ideologies, election analyses including correction of faults within the electoral system, and a myriad of analysis of policies within the pharma industry and the political environment.  These tools enhance how they can create a political view sympathetic with public opinion, trade agreements aligned with socialism, a manipulated BREXIT, and the evolution of a New Society.

In summary, what this highlights is a vast network of NGO’s that have infiltrated governments, businesses, industries, and media dedicated to psychologically analyzing and manipulating human behavior and thinking with Russia, China and the US as the predominant loose targets that have yet to succumb.  And one means of fast tracking that goal is by weaving Sharia Law into mainstream given its absolute control mechanism.

Bolshevik Revolution:  Socialist – Ushered in Marxism – casualties = 6-8 million

Stalin:  Socialist/Marxist – casualties = upward estimates 60 million

Pol Pot, Cambodia genocide: Socialist – casualties = 25% of the population 2-3 million

Mao:  Socialist/Communist/Marxist – casualties = 25-40 million

Hitler:   Socialist/Marxist – casualties = 11 million

Globalization:  Socialist/Marxist – depopulation genocide = …?

Know your enemies because they mask themselves as your friends.  They are the wolves.  Know your friends, because they have been demonized by the wolves… Stay Alert.

EU Commission: Gluttonous Spending

The EU Commission is embarking on a massive mission of garnering sought after revenue by suing major US companies including; Google, Amazon, Starbucks, Qualcomm and Apple. The woman behind the coup is Denmark’s, Margreth Vestager, a Socialist Liberal.   Vestager was the primary instigator in leveling a fine on Cyprus Airlines that ultimately resulted in their going bankrupt and the loss of 550 jobs.  By all accounts, she is – brutal.

The Google fine is heavy, weighing in at an astounding $5.1 billion as well as a demand that they change their business model to allow greater competition in the European market.  Whether this affects the share price is debatable, but the fact that the EU is specifically targeting US firms is of more interest as the Commission revenues have floundered and an appeal for funds is most likely the driving force, especially when BREXIT is finalized and 14 billion euro’s result in a significant shortfall.

The Trade War Behind The Trade War

This is not the first time the EU Commission has made headlines and enemies in trade disputes. IN 2004 Microsoft was ordered to pay $497 million which was the largest fine to date.  In 2006, they again attacked Microsoft and imposed an additional $448 million for competition violations.   And again in 2009 imposed $1.44 billion in fines.  And again in 2013, 561 million Euros.  In 2009, the EU Commission fined Intel $1.45 billion.

It would seem that the EU Commission is pocketing quite a bit of revenue from fines which, according to Article 83 of the EU Commission Protocol, are not reported as revenue but instead are held in a ‘special fund’ portfolio of high quality sovereign bonds with no designated purpose. 

In 2014, the Commission reported that of 70 separate fines imposed on various businesses, they collected $2.2 billion in ‘funds’.   In 2016, the EU Commission expenditures topped 136.4 billion Euros with roughly 8 billion going toward ‘Administration’.  Of course, it is important to note that administration is not an all inclusive of salaries and wages given that each sub-section absorbs costs that are ‘allocated’ to the specific project.   The two largest projects are;  Sustainable Growth Natural Resources, and Smart and Inclusive Growth which combined absorb over 90% of expenditures.

What the heck?

Smart and Inclusive Growth is supposedly targeting infrastructure and jobs in the least developed EU countries.   Sustainable Growth targets increased agriculture productivity.

In 2013, an external audit revealed that £109 billion out of a total of £117 billion spent by the EU in 2013 was “affected by material error”.  In fact, the audits for the previous 19 years all revealed similar deficits.  At the same time, the Commission was demanding additional sums from the UK in the amount of 1.7 billion creating  a havoc of hypocrisy and distrust.

The newly released budget for the Commission is slated at 1.14 trillion Euro.  The largest expenditure is applied to ‘foreign aid’ for countries wishing to become EU members – 123 billion Euros.

Given such an astronomical budget, what exactly has the EU Commission accomplished over it’s lifetime?

1)  It ratified the Paris Climate Accord

2)  It initiated the phasing out of export subsidies to allow poorer countries the opportunity to compete in agriculture

3)  It banished the death penalty

4)  It created a single market

5)  It ‘theoretically created open borders that meant passports were not necessary – although in reality due to the EU’s refuge and immigrant abject failures this open border policy is no longer being followed.

But most of the funding supports Research and studies that tackle various concerns including a project that determined cargo ships use less fuel than lorries, a mobile app to monitor weight loss, a publication of our galaxy, the design of an electric car for aging people, continuing research to expand renewable energy supply which now accounts for 5% of all energy output, and a project in which busses were subjected to a three year trial to determine if hydrogen fuel is a viable alternative…

While these projects all have relevance, it would seem the cost of funding the commission is rather extraordinary in comparison to the actual economic benefits achieved.

BY contrast, it would appear the US does not reciprocate in embarking in lawsuits against EU businesses that violate trade competition.

BREXIT, Theresa May’s Father, and Blackmail

Where the wind blows – so does Boris Johnson.  He has Brexited himself despite being against, for, and against, on any given day depending on where he will most likely get the most attention.   A man without ethics, he exited stage left before fulfilling the duties he had committed to – a summit on the Western Balkans.   That lack of integrity does define his honor.   But then he was never terribly committed to actually doing anything, he was following his own motley of money as he continued to botch just about everything he touched including a number of women he had affairs with. 

To think his resignation is anything but a breath of relief would be rather short sighted.   Plagued with a tongue that had no limits or boundaries, Mr. Johnson routinely bumbled his way through Parliament much like a bull in a china shop, requiring the deployment of a FT cleaner to sweep away the fragments of splintered china that he left behind.

He offended nearly everyone, lied, cheated, supported the devastation of Yemen while previously calling for the impeachment of Tony Blair for his support in the Iraq invasion.  He was the UK’s Maxine Waters with everyone wondering how the heck he managed to stay so long!

While the motivation for Johnson is questionable, the Theresa May bungling of BREXIT is truly remarkable.  In essence the soft deal is basically no BREXIT per se at all.   It is likely to be compared to Obamacare, “I guarantee you can keep your doctor and everyone will save at least $2500 per year” fiasco!

It’s a muckered down, waste of time and effort most likely composed by the Rothschilds given the demand for a re-vote didn’t fly.

What could cause May to cave to the will of the Rothschild cabal and the Swamp that infiltrated the UK decades ago?

This isn’t the only time Theresa May has surreptitiously botched an important issue upon taking office – the child sex abuse scandal reignited under her domain has just been quashed.   The main witness has now been charged with crimes including bringing false accusations, thus terminating the entire investigation which was targeting high up political and wealthy individuals, initially numbering over 1400.

And suddenly, just like that, they are all found ‘not guilty’.

Why would May allow the child sex scandal to flounder and completely shred?

Coverups and conspiracies ignite involving Chichester Diocese, All Saints of Eastbourne, Vicory House, St Barnabas in Bexhill and many others dating from as far back as the 1940’s.  Even those who were convicted in prior years served sentences that were ‘unholy’ by all definitions;   Father Keith Wilke Denford, convicted in 2013 for crimes dating 25 years prior – 18 months, Michael Mytton received a suspended nine month jail term.  Basically, a slap on the wrist.  A deal for keeping silent.

Theresa May’s father, Herbert Brasier, sought to avoid WWII and became a priest attending The Community of the Resurrection Seminary.  In years to come the Community of the Resurrection would become known for the systematic sexual abuse of children at the seminary by the Italian Verona brothers.

As the war produced more and more orphan refugees, many were sent to The Community of Mirfield where Theresa May’s father was then the vicar.  Mirfield and Resurrection were considered a tight knit group. A supply chain.

In 1953, Brasier was transferred to All Saints Hospital in Eastbourne where he presided as Chaplain.   He worked alongside Dr. John Bodkin Adams who was believed to have murdered upwards of 163 patients after having them change their wills and naming him as beneficiary.   Despite being labeled a bungler, falling asleep during operations, eating cakes and on multiple occasions injecting the wrong anaesthetic gas tube, he became the wealthiest doctor in Eastbourne.   Adams was ultimately charged with ‘one’ murder and acquitted by the presiding Judge, Sir Patrick Devlin whose wife Madeline was of the Oppenheimer family.   Multiple members of Parliament were said to be friends or lovers of Adams, thus his connections were vast and he was never convicted of murder or of theft.

It would seem that prior to Theresa May’s father marrying her mother who already had been diagnosed with MS, his postings routinely found him ensnared in the midst of and at the center of child abuse, sexual abuse and murder.   While little is known of him after May was born, the fodder for possible blackmail certainly seems a potential explanation for a whitewashing of web sources to research his life, and a Prime Minister who will do anything to keep her father’s name clear – including quashing the largest pedophilia case in the history of the UK.

And for her part, tit-for-tat, she will agree to uprooting and destroying BREXIT.

Theresa May & Sadiq Khan Failing Grade

London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, is allowing the blasphemous blimp depicting a baby Trump to fly across London when Trump meets for a summit with Theresa May and The Queen.   Khan has been blatheringly belligerent in his view of Trump since Trump proposed a temporary ban on all Middle East Immigration in 2015.  Despite Trump congratulating Khan on his win as mayor, Khan has upheld his contempt, and the feud continues.

So what has Khan accomplished during his tenancy as Mayor of London?

Stabbings are at an all time high, the murder rate is up 40% rivaling New York City, which is actually dropping, there is a spike in gun crimes, he has cut the number of police officers on the beat, he has closed youth centers, and eliminated the two strikes law.  And like Obama’s tenure, London has seen a tremendous rise in ‘hate crimes’.

Khan is anti BREXIT and decided to use government money to create a report that supports his conclusion: A no-deal BREXIT would leave the economy diminished and the people poorer.  That is the conclusion Khan asked for and the conclusion the report defined.  Apparently, the report makes future predictions that by 2030, Britain’s national income will be 3% less… if there is no transition agreement and no trade deal.

Basically, the report is based on a worst case scenario assuming that nothing changes, that the government caves to its inability to do anything whatsoever, and to a stagnant population with closing finance institutions.  Dire.

But is it reality?

Racism is on the rise in London during Khan’s tenure too.  At least that is what the media claim.  But is it true?  Or is it the same stoking we saw too often under the Obama administration to invite a belief until the belief was believed as truth?   Initiating chaos and having the government help promote, incite and provoke?

The Guardian is even taking the racism agenda a step beyond rationale claiming that BREXIT caused racism.  Of course there are other culprits in the cause of racism – capitalism and the far right.

But it isn’t just London that is currently a chaotic mess, the entire UK Parliament has come unhinged with eruptions resembling a junior high playground of bully fighting, fists and unfiltered tongues included.  The notion of the English Gentleman is most definitely a novelty of many years past. And yet these same brewhards and blowhards would hypocritically paint President Trump in an unglamorous fashion all the while failing miserably to account for his accomplishments in this past year and a half.

What has Theresa May accomplished?  Boris Johnson?  Anyone within the UK Parliament?   A list does not even exist.

What the UK has managed is the creation of a strange lot of laws:

1)  Muslims may pray on the streets individually or enmasse.  However, a man who read aloud from the Bible was arrested for inciting hate speech.

2)   MI6 helped create the Trump Dossier.

3)   The Skripal case against Russia was never proven, nor was the evidence released despite the accusation and the ultimate prosecution being finalized.

4)   The UK has banned entry, and/or jailed, activists who hold to an anti-Muslim opinion because their speech might cause Muslim’s to become violent.  This is akin to jailing the victim of a crime.

If in fact either Khan or May had a slew of amazing accomplishments behind them as Mayor and PM, their derisive attitude toward Trump might have some basis.  But given that Trump has infinite accomplishments to their none makes the entire snub rattily snotty.

Fake Political Party – a Chess Game

As the UK is beleaguered in the BREXIT divide, once again the Soros advocates are pushing protests and chaos calling for a ‘re-vote’.   The absurdity becomes laughable when we consider how this might play out.  It is reminiscent of Hillary demanding a re-vote when she lost.  I was a contender, I shoulda won! Therefore shoulda means we need a redo. Imagine the chaos if every year we had to do a  ‘redo’ of every vote the previous year?  Why bother voting?   As we see with BREXIT, it is not about moving forward after The People spoke, it is about two years of fighting about the outcome of the vote – and going nowhere.

The ridiculousness of the UK Parliament insubordination and ineptitude is framed in ‘not making a decision’ and instead voting agreeing that a decision will be deferred to a later time.  Two years have passed – and the latest vote was no exception.

These same ‘lawmakers’ who are truly incapable of actually making any political decision or decisive action, are quick to make sarcastic and defaming remarks about Trump as though they have lost every aspect of moral and ethical decorum.   In fact, their lacking decorum targets what they perceive to be Trump’s lacking decorum…

For example, what has Boris Johnson accomplished during his tenure?   

Well, he voted for the invasion of Iraq only later to demand Tony Blair’s impeachment for the UK’s collusion in invading Iraq.  He went to the Chinese Summer Olympics and offended his hosts.  He continued his journalism career while Mayor despite promising he would not.  He ended London’s oil deal with Venezuela and scrapped inspections of black cabs…  He was for BREXIT and against it and for it and against it.   Blowing wherever the wind blew him.  He has effectively done nothing for 15 years.

He has been hailed by The Economist for his decidedly liberal tendencies despite Johnson claiming he is a conservative.  The Economist is owned by the Rothschilds.

Boris Johnson is the UK’s implant of McCain.

The waters become more and more muddied as politicians are told to switch their affiliation in a subversive means of undermining the party.

Soros infiltrated US Republicans long ago, to think he hasn’t taken over the UK Parliament is short-sighted.  US Republicans that Soros has backed include:  McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John Boehner, Ed Royce, Charles Grassley, Ron Johnson, Cathy Rodgers and Dan Donovan.

ALL of these Republicans have either aggressively spoken out as anti-Trump or voted against his proposals including Iran, North Korea, trade, immigration, etc…

Colorado’s ultra-liberal, John Hickenlooper, and Ohio’s, John Kasich, are in discussion mode to form a ticket together in the 2020 presidential election.  In preparation, Kasich has been vocal about how successful and brilliant he is earning himself star appearances on liberal MSM outlets. He has also chosen to be rather disparaging of Trump regarding the detention of illegal children.

Many people vote by party, without researching anything at all.   So how can one discern who is a fake representative of their party?

More and more it is important to ‘follow the money’, because a politician who is pursuing an agenda, is a politician who has no ethic.  Of course, determining what that agenda is can also be rather difficult.   If the motive is to destabilize, to create chaos and division, that would be a first agenda.  If the MSM is supportive, that would indicate an approved agenda.

Adding to the fray is the hacking issues.   Today it was revealed that Wikileaks released the personal information of all ICE employees.  And so, the MSM has made it a Julian Assange terror attack.   But – what is the agenda?   In the midst of Trump’s zero tolerance for illegal immigration, taking down ICE would support the liberal agenda.  The obvious and logical conclusion is that WikiLeaks has been hacked, compromised.  Assange himself has been said to be in dire health, and the Ecuadorian embassy has said that ‘any communication’ would give them cause to expel him.

Whose agenda has it been for the last two years to take down Julian Assange?

Hillarygate.

She claimed that Wikileaks was partially responsible for her loss.

A party affiliation is meaningless any longer.   Follow the agenda.  Follow the money.  Kasich has penned a book… remind you of anyone else ramping up wealth in order to run for office?  Who else is writing a book?

G7 Summit Ruled by EU Commission

The G7 Summit is taking place in Quebec under the tutelage of Trudeau.   The purpose of the Summit is to talk about global topics chosen this year by Trudeau to include:  ocean pollution, trade tariffs, and climate change.  The Summit was originally created in 1973 by George Schulz.  It was to be attended by the finance ministers of four countries;  West Germany, UK, US and France.  It has historically evolved to include Canada, Italy, Japan, and Russia, although Russia was expelled in 2014.  

The President’s of these countries basically get together, have some food, meander around the property, and talk.  The only spouse to accompany her husband was Macron’s.  After two days, they go home and nothing changes.  From the perspective of a businessman, it is a huge waste of time.  From the perspective of the various politicians attending it gives them airtime. For Macron, it gives him hug time.

For example, in February 2009, the group of finance ministers met in Rome and pledged to take all necessary steps to stem the financial crisis.  That was the sum total of the meeting.  Seems to me a phone call could have accomplished that at a considerable fraction of the cost.

But it has become a media hype and everyone wears their Sunday best.  Furthering division, the summit conspicuously omits other global countries; Ireland, India, Scotland, The Netherlands, China, Russia, Spain, Portugal, Brazil, etc.., etc…  Instead it is more of a good ol’ boy platform wherein tradition is the only rationale.

The end result of this meeting seems to be that Trump and the EU will talk about trade in two weeks. Macron thinks the US should be expelled from future summits.  And as representative for ALL EU countries, Merkel stated that they all agree Russia should remain expelled.  I wonder if the ‘other countries’ were notified of their agreement before or after her statement?

Apparently, the new PM of Italy, Giuseppe Conte, stated that he felt Russia should be reinvited. However, the EU Council President, Donald Tusk, speaking on behalf of Conte said that Italy would toe the line and be a follower, not a leader.  I wonder if Conte is royally miffed!

Why would the EU Commissioner and EU Council President be at the G7?  They are not countries. 

In 1977, the UK PM, James Callahan, made the unilateral decision to henceforth include the EU Council and EU Commission as a part of the summit.  Supposedly, Juncker and Tusk are there as a united front to represent the remaining EU countries that are not invited.  Why?   Why not let sovereign nations speak for themselves?   Because in reality they are not sovereign, their voice is censored.

If the G7 Summit is really about the EU, and given Canada is a parcel of the Queen of England, why would the US or Russia have any desire to participate?  Both Tusk and Juncker are representatives of ‘open society’ and globalization.   They have collectively taken over the Summit which was originated in the US.

After losing a re-election bid in Poland, Tusk became the EU Council President.   He has since been openly accusatory that the current President of Poland and his conservative party are puppets of Putin.  In addition, he claims that the EU values are quite polar opposite from the values of Poland under conservatism and nationalism. In 2017, Juncker initiated an investigation into the President and his Party claiming ‘judicial independence concerns’.  

The bottom line is the fact that according to the EU any country that is not governed by a Socialist Party towing the line of the EU ‘values’, is operating under a fascist government and sanctions will be levied including being stripped of voting rights.

Hungary is also facing potential sanctions by the EU for their stance on conservatism.   Hungary has come under attack for expelling Soros and refusing to bow to the EU demands for African immigrant quotas.

Slovakia is facing condemnation for similar stances.

BREXIT is meaningless as long as Theresa May continues to be a pawn of MI6 and the Merkel.  What is more relevant is the growing number of countries that are standing up to the Royal Arm of the EU Commission and Council who tend to act much like the Wizard of Oz – behind a red curtain.

Which country in the EU will be next?