Facebook Censorship – An Anti-Trust Resolution?

The media that fought valiantly to indignantly assert their claim that they are NOT BIASED, don’t even try to pretend any longer.  The front page of the New York Times has over 20 articles that are anti-conservative defaming.  There is not one attempt at middle ground.  It is as though they have pulled their thumb from the dike that was always the New York Times and vomit hate within the flood of torrent waters.  Most, if not all of the headlines are false, they aren’t news, they aren’t imbedded in facts, they are ‘opinion’ disguised in the new media veil of undisclosed source or anonymous. 

Of course the other media outlets that cry foul when called out as Liberal biased, including the Washington Post and CNN, have also let loose the pretense and opened a floodgate of demonizing and hate.

Even their stock reports were oddly seemingly biased.   In a story about Caterpillar stock, CNN provided a gloomy and negative picture all aligned within a Trumpism causation.  However, The Wall Street Journal had a completely different perspective with glowing support.  FYI; Caterpillar grew year over year by 24%, it’s earnings beat estimates, and its sales continue to exceed expectations ramping up 23%.  Profit taking dropped the stock.  It did not issue any warnings as The Washington Post is stating.

Ellen Degenres producer has openly, without filter, attacked Melania in every way possible, from her appearance, her style, her behavior, her actions, to her ethnicity.  All within the guise of ‘tolerance and kindness’.    Apparently, female power only applies to Liberal females.

The Washington Post has also lifted any pretense it may have proclaimed, and dry heaves the most egregious bias of opinion and hatred toward anyone who dares support Trump.

Ads are being pumped across these venues by Facebook as it proclaims it is working diligently to expel all the fake media outlets that might assert an opinion in contrast to the Liberal agenda.   While claiming to use AI to shred the conservative/fake accounts, Facebook fails to acknowledge that AI is a program by definition.  And programs are created by humans.  And those humans are employed by Facebook.

Last January Julian Assange of WikiLeaks warned about the massive ramping up of Facebook, Google and their Chinese counterparts to censor information:

“Burgeoning digital super states such as Facebook, Google and their Chinese equivalents who are integrated with the existing order, have moved to re-establish discourse control. This is not simply a corrective action. Undetectable mass social influence powered by artificial intelligence is an existential threat to humanity.”

AI harvests what it is told to harvest, expunges what it is told to expunge, and eliminates what it is told to eliminate.   It is an algorithm not independent.  It’s information is the result of its program analytics.  And yet, Facebook would have the world believe that because it is AI, somehow it is unbiased…

Even that is fake news.

Zuckerberg continually makes news as “institutional shareholders” of Facebook stock want him removed from the Board of Directors.  It would thus appear, that his sellout to the globalists hasn’t panned exactly as planned.  And they want more.  Institutional Ownership constitutes roughly 60% of the shares with Chevy Chase Holding and Strs Ohio leading the pack.     But it is Trillium Wealth Management that has openly made the call.  Its CEO, Matthew William Patsky, was a Hillary Victory donor.

Could it be that Hillary blames Zuckerberg for her Presidential loss, and he will simply become the latest hit list victim despite desperate attempts to completely censor Facebook?

“If you look at Facebook, the vast majority of the news items posted were fake,” she asserted. “They were connected to, as we now know, the 1,000 Russian agents who were involved in delivering those messages …”

But Zuckerberg’s fate may be a result of too little too late as far as Hillary is concerned.  Despite being warned by Soros funded Media Matters that censorship of conservative news was paramount before the 2016 election, Zuckerberg dragged his feet and didn’t initiate the purge until Trump was elected.  That put him in the wiles of Hillary – and the call for his ousting is rather non-coincidental.

The need to completely obliterate conservative media is the goal.  And as Assange warned, it may be too vast already to obliterate….  But Trump has asked for an investigation into whether Facebook, Google and Twitter have engaged in anti-trust violations regarding ‘fair competition’.   While Zuckerberg claims the censorship is Russia related, he also admitted in testimony that the alleged Russia interference was so marginally small as to have no impact.  In so doing, he has set himself up as a potential target by this admission given that the hits and expulsions are predominantly conservative and thus he is engaging in anti-trust behavior.  In addition, Facebook has been called out for age bias when posting job ads for various companies.  In that frame, Facebook applies an algorithm in which only millennials ‘see’ the ad, a blatant discrimination violation.

While claiming that AI is making the determinations, he is basically asserting that AI is an independent entity out of the control of Facebook.

An interesting defense, but one that has no basis – hence ousting Zuckerberg would thus be Facebook’s purge as they make him the root and cause of all their problems.  The scapegoat.  With a Supreme Court aligned with Trump – such a charge could have a more fair judicial decision.

Other media outlets may find themselves facing similar charges.

Wikipedia: A Facebook/Google Protege

Sometime ago I got hooked on the phrase “Follow The Money”.  It has proven to be even more than I could possibly imagine.  And today was proof again.

I was reading that Breitbart has been delisted from Wikipedia as a source, and they are further considering blacklisting.  And while Wikipedia has a history of controversies, including the fact that most schools prohibit Wikipedia from being used as a citation, they seem to have jumped onto the Facebook – Google Bandwagon, and their Liberal bias is just as perverse, if not more so!

Wikipedia is actually owned by Wikimedia Foundation which is governed by a Board and has as it’s current Executive Director, Katherine Maher.  Her bio states that she worked for the National Democratic Institute, an NGO whose Chair is Madeleine Albright, a Trilateral confederate, and whose source of funding includes the US Department of State, as well as the governments of Australia, Denmark and Belgium.   The Board Chair of the Foundation, Christophe Henner, has no Wikimedia profile at all – a rather bizarre oddity.

In case that doesn’t hit a home run, that means, a US NGO that is pro- Clinton, Soros, and everything Liberal is funded by ALL US taxpayers as well as governments from very Liberal/Socialist countries…  The irony being that Republicans are funding Liberal NGO’s!  I’m sure they find this very humorous…

Ahhh, but it gets better.

In 2015, Wikipedia attempted to launch “Knowledge Engine” which aimed to created a loop of sorts that would take internet searches back to them no matter the content or the Google search wording.  The funding for this cryptic engine was the Knight Foundation.  In line with numerous media outlets; NBC, ABC, NYT, and WAPO, The James L. Knight Foundation also backs the Investigative News Network, INN, which is funded by Soros Open Society Foundation, and is possibly the most-well-known journalism foundation. Knight President and CEO, Alberto Ibargüen, is on the board of directors for ProPublica.

Pro-Publica is affiliated with The New York Times and gets it’s funding from; Open Society Foundation, Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Ford Foundation Pew Charitable Trusts, The Carnegie Corporation and the Atlantic Philanthropies.  We can assume – that all these foundations are interlinked within the Democrat Foundation, ie, The Swamp.

How deep does it go?

The founders of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, made their debut launching an ‘adult content’ erotica portal that Wales likened to Maxim magazine. Many of the Trustees and Board author content for Wikipedia under pseudonyms, many of which have German tenure and nearly all, if not all, would appear to be – Liberals.

What this reveals is a very intense demonstrative action to – rewrite history.  To eradicate all but one thought process.  And to dummy down, not just the US, but the world when it comes to people, events, and even – opinion.  Wikipedia has a huge presence in Germany, Australia, UK, Canada, India, etc… They crafted themselves as the purveyor of knowledge, the definer of history, and the opinion of mankind.

And now, they have chosen to defame sources that they deem do not align with their World Agenda.

The extent to which we have been manipulated only seems to grow exponentially with the unveilings.  We are all sources.  We were all duped.  We have all been manipulated at some point.  And yet, these people, these web communities, would seem to have absolutely no self examination or guilt.   Instead they would seem to take pride in the extent to which they can fool and demonize.  These people that Jimmy Wales surrounded himself with came from Google, JP Morgan, Semantic, Quora, the UN, etc…, with a very large presence coming from – Merkel’s, Germany.

The same Merkel who censors media and promotes the criminal offense of saying anything anti-Islam.

The bio’s of these affiliates of Wikimedia are typically referred to as so-and-so of the Wikimedia Movement.  “Our aim was to identify a common strategic direction that would unite and inspire people across our movement on our way to 2030, and help us make decisions.”

Each month on average, Wikipedia is viewed more than 15 billion times, and accessed by more than 1 billion unique devices.  More than 200,000 editors are volunteers.  German researchers rank Wikipedia high as a reliable source…  And this one is quite grand!  Researchers at Harvard, the same Harvard that has produced MOST of The Swamp, concluded that Wikipedia’s editors are critical reliable resources for verifiable topics and concerns…

Surprise!

Of course, this glowing tribute was written by a California lawyer within the law firm associated with the Milken Institute.  If you remember!  Michael Milken was convicted on felony charges for violating SEC laws, racketeering and his charitable giving.

Not exactly a stellar resume for lauding Wikipedia!  FOLLOW the Money, but also follow the Lineage.

At any rate – we can see from the Money Flow – where Wikipedia stands and why it is in line with the Liberal persuasion of Google and Facebook, why it utilizes it’s influence to create a burgeoning false agenda and how it specifically targets that design.

Buyer – Beware.