US Socialist Party – A Distraction?

Where have all the Democrats gone, long time passing, where have all the Democrats gone, long time ago…

Fourteen Democrats have made the announcement that they will be in the run up for the Presidential bid in 2020.  After splashing through the media, gloating over their financing and mucking up their scripts, they have all but disappeared.  Into the shadows, licking their wounds, they quickly discovered that the truth cannot be faked.  As such, new scripts are being created;  one script will support the Green ideologies, and the other script will attempt to convey a more moderate viewpoint.  Which one they dust off depends on the wind.

Kamala Harris made a fool of herself as she claimed to be puffing joints while in college and listening to rappers that didn’t even exist.

Elizabeth Warren tried to drink a beer but didn’t know how to open the bottle.

Bernie Sanders is busily trying to justify his three elaborate homes under a Socialist agenda.

Biden is hoping all the creepy photos of him fondling little girls can be destroyed.

And Beto the beast is grappling with claims he is a verifiable lunatic.

Meanwhile, not to be left on the sidelines, Marco Polo Rubio is testing the waters by pouting that someone needs to run against Trump – as in mememememe?  Pretty please give me money…

But no one is in the news.  Hollywood is relatively quiet given their penchant for self granulizing.  No one seems to be making the waves necessary to actually point to a possible game changer.  And not one candidate has announced anything remotely innovative that would make them shine.  In fact, it would appear that the script is universal and only the tone of the candidate differentiates one from another.  Whether it is shrieking Warren, or bug eyed Kamala, or bat eye Beto, they are all reading from the exact same platform script and would seem too ignorant to understand that means they are thus running on charm and beauty instead.   A losing agenda.

Of course the media is attempting to address this bizarre anomaly by declaring that the Democrats are no longer a Party, instead they are a “Movement”.    The backdrop of this Movement would appear to be highly controversial as even Socialist Bernie has employed Faiz Shakir to be his campaign advisor.  Faiz Shakir, a Pakistani Muslim, was senior advisor to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, groomed at Harvard, and a founding member of ThinkProgress.org, a far left unionized political blog.

Kamala Harris has employed the granddaughter of Cesar Chavez, a far left radical labor union devotee, in addition to her sister.  The alliance is likely to inspire labor unions to add $$$$$ to her campaign, because the democrats continue to believe that a candidate is made by their monetary backing, and not by their personage.

The Movement is energized by common shifts from the staunch Democrat agenda of the world according to Hillary.   Radicalism has captured the Movement with Socialism becoming the core phenomena.  The shift from a centrist party to pure socialism is particularly interesting given the collapse of entire countries within this idealism.  Venezuela is only one example.  Cuba, Poland, Russia, Yugoslavia, and most eastern European countries at one time embraced socialism.  Each time, it collapsed the country and sent it spiraling into poverty.

As such, the obvious assumption is that the only way the Cabal believes it can own the US is through its collapse.   And Socialism is the means.  It is the new script that has come out of the closet and decided to boldly go where no American can survive.  It is the precipitator to mass exodus.  And just as we have witnessed in such countries as Sweden, The Netherlands, and Norway, it ultimately results in lower birth rates of nationals, and emigration of the youth as they search for a better life in countries that embrace hope within free market capitalism.

Where would Americans emigrate if the US slipped into socialism?

Still, despite the congruence of the new Democrat Socialist Movement, none of the candidates for President in 2020 have the charisma or the clarity to create a solitary lead and as they vie for that place of King of the Mountain.  They will invariably need to haul some pretty ugly mudballs at their fellow Movementors in order to be seen as the candidate of choice.  In essence, the Mud alone might collapse the entire Socialist cry and usher in something just as fearsome.

Which brings us to what no one dares to utter for fear that it is the back game of King against Queen chess – Michelle Obama.   Obama has not openly commented on the New Green Deal.  Waiting to see the American response, her chess move is cued but holding tight.

Fortunately, Michelle Obama is not without her gaffs, and potential corrupt schemes, but she has a powerful force behind her – The Cabal.  The same cabal that created the Clinton Dynasty with the lure of money and power is harvesting their brainchild in the form of the next generation. Given their losses within Trump’s rule, they are angry, and within that anger a rage is building.  They have lost a number of key chess men, but the Queen is still viable.

Busily traipsing across the US with her new book in tow, Michelle Obama is likely to make a last minute announcement of her decision to run whereby the distractors will all immediately dissolve to allow her free reign.  I imagine she would be presented as a solution to the radical left socialists. She would likely run on the same platform that created her husband – Hollywood charm.

Former President Obama continues to make the media rounds promoting his self success, his accomplishments, and his ability to shelve his ego – OUCH!   Should Michelle Obama actually run, it would necessitate inventorying those purported successes employed by husband Barack and that could be the wrecking ball.  An Obama run could also invigorate investigations surrounding Hillarygate FISA, and collusion within the Mueller blackmail.

It is a precarious stage, and what we read, what we see, is often a distraction from the reality that is a game of chess.

Veteran Administration- Corrupt To The Core

Much attention has recently been logged on veterans, veteran suicides, and the Department of Veteran Affairs.   While there seems to be an ever lacking source of funds for veterans – that would not apply to the employees of the Department of Veteran Affairs.

With an annual budget of $180 billion and nearly 378,000 employees, they still decry fowl as they lay open an empty proverbial wallet…   And the efforts of a relatively quick research expedition might answer – why.

Factoids:  There are 150 VA hospitals, 820 VA clinics, 300 counseling centers, and 5.5 to 6 million patients.  Wait time for a medical decision is anywhere from 120 days to a year.  Whoa cowboy.  Brakes on.   Socialist, medicine requires a ‘one year’ wait list.   Similar to other nationalized, socialized medicine in Social countries. 80% of veterans are white, 11% are black and 6% are Hispanic – by comparison, the US census registers; 12.7% black, 17.8% Hispanic and 61.8% white.   A bit skewed.

How many of the 378,000 employees are doctors and nurses?

Apparently, according to the Government Accounting Office – they don’t know.  They believe there may be at least 11,000 doctors, and roughly 80,000 nurses and nurse assistants.  That would leave 287,000 VA employees unaccounted for, or 76%.  The doctor to patient ratio extrapolates to 1 doctor for every 545 VA patients.  The national average of doctor to patient ratio is roughly 1000 to 2500 patients per doctor.

Obviously we have a problem Houston.  The VA employs 2-4 times as many doctors as the public sector and yet is abysmally deficient in care, wait times are catastrophic, but wait – there is another interesting phenomena… pay scale.

Payscales of RN’s and doctors vary by state.  In the public world, California nurses have the highest average pay rate of $102,000.  The lowest is South Dakota at roughly $57,000 full time.   But within the VA, the payscale for California nurses is significantly higher with base pay reaching $164,200.  In addition, since they are government employees, their pay is supplemented with full pension derivatives and a host of benefits unavailable to public sector RN’s.

It is no different for doctors.  A ‘staff physician’ in the VA can make upwards of $264,000, in the real world that salary is roughly $190,000 to $214,000 which would not include that lovely lifetime pension.

With inflated salaries, benefits and pensions absorbing the budget, it is no wonder veterans are short changed.  It used to be that the government pension was to support a significantly ‘lower’ wage compared to the public sector.   Skews skewer.

Why are doctors unable to cope with their patient load when it is roughly ½ to ¼ of the real world?   That would be called ‘nationalized medicine’.  It is defined by labor unions who likely tally the number of hours a military doctor or nurse may work, divided by the infinite number of holidays, sick days, vacation days, and break times interspersed into this very tawdry Nationalized Medicare For All – system.

But even more catastrophic is the fact that roughly 76% of the VA employees are not medical at all, but likely ‘administrative’.   How much of the $180 billion is spent to officiate…the administrators is an unknown because these departments are not transparent.   Government accounting 101.  Make it so ridiculously convoluted that a public center CPA, such as I was, can not make heads or tails of the train wreck without spending wayyyy to much of my time.   This is the true hypocrisy.

In 2015, the estimated cost for medical care for veterans was $55.4 billion out of a total budget of $164 billion.   One Third.

But the VA benefits are not used just for medical care, they are supposed to provide Home loan Guarantee, Insurance, Vocational Rehab, Education, Disability Compensation, Pensions, and burial and maintenance benefits.  That’s a whole lot of Socialist Spending.

The backlog that has received the most criticism is the agency designated to determine if a veteran is even qualified to receive disability benefits.   Mismanagement is monumental.  In 2009, President Bush proposed that 86.5% of the total budget be allocated to medical.  As in VA Hospitals.  The result?   Cost overruns have doubled and quadrupled initial budgets pushing deadlines for construction out years.  Unions have infiltrated and demanded continued pension and benefits for veterans convicted of crimes.   Dead people still receive compensation.  And the VA really has little idea who they employ, how many, in what capacity, and for what purpose.  The system has been broken for decades, and yet each time the train wreck reaches the public and media, the result is to throw more money at ‘it’ and thus ‘away’.

This is the finest example of “Medicare For All”.

The New and Improved GI Bill gave 100% education scholarships to veterans who had served “three years”!   And veterans who have served 10 years can transfer all their entitlements to their spouse or children.

Drip.  Drip.

The VA’s last published Freedom of Information data was 2012-2013 – and it earned a grade of D.  What the HECK?

Who is at fault?

Bureacracy.  The Swamp.  In the Government, a Budget is a request based on the use of the previous budget.  If all the budget was used, and more is needed, no one questions the use.  And so we see ridiculous cost overruns for green atrium aquariums and architects who envision the Taj Mahal in designing the Hospitals that are not available for actual use because the tile was imported from Sri Lanka and got lost on the way as it was transported by a Chinese company that had to divert shipment to Venezuela…

And all the hospital equipment?   It was inadvertently sent to Germany via The Netherlands where it was offloaded and trucked to the Ukraine so that Chocolate King, Poroshenko, can resell it to the US via Iran.  At a premium.

While the veterans die in the parking lot.

China and US Trade Alliance – Powerhouse!

The World Socialists are teetering precariously as their internal bastion of corruption leaks through Holland’s Dyke. 

France’s Macron is being splashed across European headlines as he touts a ‘European Renaissance’ amidst the crumbling infrastructure and political chaos that is devouring his own country.  The Deutsche Welle media outlet is spouting terminology such as ‘revival’ and ‘visionary’ to emphasize the greatness of what is essentially Macron’s EU Nationalism. The dirty word.   The core of Macron’s vision which isapparently ‘on everyone’s lips’ is …. drum roll… ‘Climate Change’.   The initiative?  A Climate investment bank.   Problem? There already is a Climate Investment Bank, it is called The Green Climate Fund which is administered by the UN.

Macron’s speech goes on to demand that the EU protect itself from US and Chinese competition through a Nationalized trade agreement, Aachen, between Germany and France.

Somehow the rest of the EU countries weren’t included in this EU vision.  Odd.

Canada’s Social darling Trudeau is embroiled in his own seascape of flooding waters as implications of bribery and corruption in a case between Trudeau, his government, and a company, SNC-Lavalin, unfolds.  Treasury cabinet Minister, Jane Philpott, has resigned her position stating the ‘current circumstances’ make her ability to defend the Cabinet ‘untenable’.

SNC-Lavalin paid bribes to the Canadian government in the form of illegal contributions in order to assure that the Canadian government wouldn’t prosecute them for paying bribes to obtain contracts in Canada and Libya.

This is how Socialism works in reality.

In the meantime, the US Socialist plant, Ocasio-Cortez, and her campaign manager, Chakrabarti, are being investigated for transferring $885,000 worth of campaign contributions to various self-controlled LLC’s through their PAC Justice Democrats.  Basically, it is a Ponzi scheme of moving money between various companies in order to evade FEC regulations concerning finance reporting requirements.  Oops.

Not only could this ‘arrangement’ result in significant fines, but jail time is also a possibility.

Socialism.  It is an art form.

Amidst the surge of socialist flooding, Trump continues to hold the helm toward Making America Great Again despite the media rhetoric and constant defamation.

Trump is doing what he does best – negotiating.  While the political purities who have no business acumen deride and find fault, they reveal their utter lack of understanding anything outside political bribery.

Trump is negotiating the deal of the century with China’s Xi Jinping.  This deal is revolutionary given China has never entered into a government modeled trade agreement with any nation ever.   It is considered one of the most legally complex negotiations in history and marks a true Champion of an alliance.  Aligning the world’s two largest powerhouses would in effect completely redefine the world.

The naysayers are squeezing through the thumbhole of the Dyke giving all sorts of explanations why the China-US trade deal is no big deal.   Shearing claims such a deal will not ‘jolt the global economy’.  And perhaps the key point is the term ‘global’.  True, it won’t benefit the EU.  It won’t benefit Canada.  But isn’t that the point?  Trump isn’t working to benefit the globalization globe, he’s working to benefit the US.  Period.

In addition, these naysayers are quick to point out that a deal hasn’t actually materialized yet.  Details are scarce.  And North Korea didn’t succumb to Trump’s demands.  Yet.

But if one reads inside the China landscape and the markets that have just now become significantly more positive, the wall would seem to have been razed.  It is a complicated lengthy process, but one that would see both sides working toward a new future.  And unlike the Iran deal, in which Obama gave Iran $150 billion without Congressional approval, China is a cutting edge economy rivaling the US for first place.    The Iran deal was basically a bidding war by European and US businesses to grow their economy while reaping profits.  It had no relative benefit to the US or the US citizens.  I wonder if Obama bought shares in some of those bidding companies?

China’s economy is worth $12,237.7 billion.  Iran’s economy is worth $430.7 billion, or 3.5% of China’s.

Figure it out.

The Green New Deal: A Carbon Tax For Socialists

Ocasio-Cortez has stated that mankind will be vanquished in 12 years.  Her New Green Deal has a time frame of 10 years to implement assuming it starts – today.   In the EU, they continue to establish time frames reaching emission goals extending to 2050 – 31 years in the future.   China really doesn’t give a rat’s arse, they just agree to whatever proposal is put forth, sign on the dotted line, and then refuse to actually comply.   What makes the Green New Deal so ridiculous is that it only applies to the US.   So the rest of the world will keep producing their climate change pollution, push out their goals 31 years in the future, and we’ll all be Socially broke or dead.

The Green New Deal states that the US will be the major exporter of Green technology, expertise, products, and services.  But according to her calculations, there would be no one left to export to because they missed the train and did nothing – so they would be dead.

Who wrote the Green New Deal?

The Media would have us believe that Ocasio-Cortez was the author.  However, her acumen would beg to differ.  In fact, Ed Markay, who is listed as ‘co-author’, is likely the frontrunner.  However, given the world of politics, I imagine they both had the help of some powerful prompters who hired the best writers to create this monstrosity.

What is not so headlined is the fact that the Green Deal calls for the implementation of the “social cost of carbon”, which is essentially a tax first introduced by Obama.   It is basically the same ‘tax’ that disproportionally affects low income workers and resulted in the Yellow Vest Movement in France.  Not working too well.

The basic concept of a carbon tax is that the increased cost will incentivize industries to find ways to pollute less, and incentivize citizens to stay home more and conserve.  A number of economists feel this tax will lower emissions while creating more jobs.  But there is absolutely no correlative proof that a carbon tax creates jobs…and despite its implementation in France and Germany, they have failed again to reach their stated goals pushing the date ever further.  What it does provide is revenue for governments to offset deficit spending or divert elsewhere.

Today, the Federal and state governments impose excise taxes on gasoline.  The federal tax is 18.4cents per gallon, while state taxes vary but range roughly in the 31cent range.   We are already being taxed around 50cents per gallon.   Why isn’t this money spent on ‘green stuff’?

Where did this tax originate?

The Revenue Act of 1932 incorporated the first oil tax at 1cent per gallon.   The purpose?  To help balance the budget deficit.   Over 86 years the tax has increased by 5000%.  That’s called government spending.

According to a report by Science Direct in 2016, $28 billion in carbon revenues are collected each year from 40 different countries.  Of that total, 27% is used to subsidize green spending in energy efficiency, the balance is allocated to a general fund and to corporate and individual taxpayers through tax cuts and rebates.   In fact, Sweden, the UK, British Columbia, Mexico, Finland and Iceland spend -0-% on Green Funding.   Australia spends 15%.  Germany and Canada are not mentioned.

The point is simplistic. The Socialist Agenda is always ‘how funds should be spent’, rather than ‘how funds are spent’.

Which companies reap the reward of the Green Funding?

According to a report issued by Friends of Science,;

“Since 1991, the Energy Foundation has been the main instrument that a network of influential U.S. foundations has used to define a portfolio of policy options, political strategies, and energy technologies to address global warming. It was set up by way of large block grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, and MacArthur Foundation, and supported in later years by the Hewlett Foundation, Packard Foundation, and other funders. The Energy Foundation’s principal function is to “leverage money in a highly concentrated pattern on behalf of policies that shift markets, industry, and consumers in the direction of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency practices.

It should come as no surprise that the aforementioned foundations are ALL Liberal, Democrat affiliates.

Of course no Green Funding Dark Money scam is complete without highlighting Al Gore.  Between 1999 and 2019, Al Gore managed to amass a personal wealth rivaling Mitt Romney, pegged at over $300 million.  In 1999, his wealth was calculated at roughly $1.5 million all of which was inherited from his family.  His entire fortune was amassed through companies he started that mooched off the global warming scam.

And the Paris Climate Accord funds?  Those funds are predominantly shifted to spending in Africa whose carbon footprint is -0-.  If in fact Green Funding was Green, it would be spent on those countries whose footprint is the greatest – not the least…

When in doubt… follow der money.

And lastly, the media cites FDR’s New Deal as a compliment to the Green New Deal.  But FDR’s deal was the impetus that spiraled this country in a forever greater debt, a forever greater welfare, and a forever greater depletion of the middle class.  It is also noteworthy that the New Deal was implemented via Executive Order, because it would never have passed Congress.

BREXIT: A New Referendum?

The UK’s Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn has announced that they would back a new and improved referendum to clarify that the people of the UK really don’t support BREXIT at all.  According to Corbyn, having such a vote would instantly erase the chaos that exists in the UK Parliament where tensions are strung tight, voices are loud, and insults are slung with the precision of an AK-47.

Short sided?

Obviously the ploy is to stage a new vote that will be rigged better than the last one to assure the ‘stayers’ a win.  Should that occur, the Parliament can sit back and actually do something of value to earn their keep.  However, it is a highly inflammatory move that could likely send the UK into an all out civil uprising given that the people are quite aware of the corruption.

In keeping with the illusion of fairness, Corbyn says that they will call this a ‘confirmation referendum’ – just to make sure that what was already voted on by the public is really what they still want because he is convinced that the last vote was rigged.

In contrast, Donald Tusk, of the EU Commission has announced that an extension of the March 29 deadline would likely be approved by all 27 member states in the vein of grace and goodwill.  YUCK.

At this point, Theresa May is watering down the BREXIT agreement to such an extent, that in all likelihood, it is no longer BREXIT at all.  Shadow Secretary, Emily Thornberry, went even further tweeting that Theresa May’s prposed deal be put forth before the public, and if they don’t accept it then it is a slam dunk to “remain”!

If it sounds like Blackmail, it probably is blackmail.

One of the major concerns regarding BREXIT is the impact it will have not on the UK, but on the European Union.  Not only is the UK a positive contributor, but with Germany’s growth staggering close to the point of recession, and France embroiled in a budget row excluding the demands of the Yellow Vests, who is going to fund the globalists?

What is interesting is the timing.  Theresa May has implied she will be stepping down from her role this summer.   If in fact a no deal is allowed and an extension is not requested or approved, May will go down in history as the cause.  If an extension is added to the March 29 deadline for three months as Juncker is hinting, that deadline would align with May’s predecessor taking over.   If May is just borrowing time, the resulting chaos that would engulf the UK would coincide with her quick flight to lala land.

The end result would be the sanctioning of the UK by the EU Commission, or an automatic remain injunction, both of which would send shockwaves and likely result in massive protests.

Given the Leave contingent are representative of conservative political ideologies, it follows that the Socialists are the remain.  Socialists dominate the EU Commission.  Germany is a highly Socialist state and Merkel has been at the helm to denounce any negotiation proposal brought forth by May.  Reconfiguring the costs that were born by the UK and distributing them proportionally to the remaining EU members will put Germany in the forefront to absorb the greatest proportion.   Given Germany’s economy has shown signs of cracking, the burden is enough to pull Germany into a recession.  And if Germany falls, the EU falls.

Hedge Funds are poised to react quickly to buy or short the pound, and the profits will revert to those holding the puppet strings.   But until the game is over, everyone is poised, hand ready to hit the red button – sell or buy…

World Leaders: Pussies Without A Clue

Ronald Reagan was the last lion.

He radically changed the tax system, defeated communism, cut the price of oil by 60% and made the US the most powerful country the world has ever known.

As much I loathe Winston Churchill, at least he wasn’t a pussy without a clue. The guy at one point carried a rifle. He may have been a racist but at least he wasn’t a fucking baby. He smoked incessantly, drank scotch all day long and reviled in insulting his political enemies. God do we miss the guy.

Now, a US senator resigns because he put his hands over a woman’s breasts on a flack jacket.

Another is told to resign over a high school Halloween costume.

A German Chancellor can’t figure out why admitting a million male Syrian Muslims that can’t speak German might be bad for Germany.

A French PM can’t stop Moroccan hordes from destroying southern France. His own citizens tear Paris to pieces, Jews are run out of a country they’ve lived in for 10 generations and he hides.

In the US, politicians hide while high school kids are assaulted…

their school’s targeted and their lives endangered. Meanwhile, around the world, these same leaders cower from even the smallest problem.

The number of countries that balance their federal budgets can be counted on your left foot.

Even with a literal flood of money, these same governments can barely function. Welfare is handed out by the boatload, the people suffer from obesity, uselessness and diabetes and nobody can figure out why this is a bad thing.

And as people get fatter, lazier and more useless, the worldwide whining hits a fever pitch in a chorus of WHAT ABOUT ME!

The simple fact is,

If Vladimir Putin ran in any western country, he’d win.

The last President of the US went on television to announce his March Madness basketball picks while we were at war in five countries. He did an interview about politics on Comedy Central. And while the Navy Seals were killing Osama bin Ladin, he was in the White House kitchen playing hearts with “the body,” a man the White hired “to keep the President company.”

The President before him was so stupid he couldn’t pronounce the word nuclear.

On 911 he was reading children’s books to a grammar school class. During the Vietnam war, he joined the “Champaign unit” of the Texas national guard and learned to fly a decommissioned plane while there was a pilot shortage. Then he went AWOL and had it covered up by his daddy. His first major campaign stop was the Little League World’s series. He was given a baseball team and a massive middle eastern oil concession and couldn’t make money on either one.

America’s current crew of candidates…

include a slut, a communist, a spoiled, suburban socialist, a man who drew a grand total of 65 supporters at a border wall protest whose previous occupation was nanny. Then there’s a 76-year-old groper and another 76-year-old media “icon” who 95% of the population wouldn’t recognize in a police lineup. And to make matters worse, no one seems to know why a secretary of state who shared confidential information with people with no security clearances and took in $230 million in “speaking fees” might be doing something wrong.

Most of Europe is run by hedge fund managers for the benefit of banks.

They’re so inept they can’t even agree on what language should be used on bathroom doors. The only leader in all of Europe with any cojones’ is the 92-year-old Queen Elizabeth.

As I said, if Vladimir Putin ran for office in any western country, he’d not only win, he’d win in a huge landslide.

Thomas Jefferson once said that the people will end up with leaders they deserve. Let’s hope to God he’s wrong.

 

Tucker Carlson Meets A Socialist Narcissist.

A 30 year old Dutch Socialist author who writes books on Utopia and praises the same Ocasio-Cortez ideals including; income for all, a 15 hour work week, open borders, and the elimination of billionaires through wealth confiscation, secretly taped Tucker Carlson coming unhinged in a segment of an interview that was not aired.    He then took this unauthorized surreptitious tape and posted it on public media.  While doing so would not appear illegal, it certainly bears the same Democrat/Liberal agenda of ‘leaking to the press’.

Bregman apparently thought it would be very utopiesque to release the choreographed tape to John-Q public via Twitter.  It was an obvious pre-meditated sabotage in an attempt to discredit Carlson, and demonize his show.  Baited throughout the interview, Carlson lost it, and expelled a slew of expletives. He knows better, but sometimes in this bitter agenda of hatred, a person loses it.  And that would be the only excuse Carlson could offer.

Bregman accused Carlson of some hefty demons, including the fact that Carlson has accumulated wealth, pegged at $8 million, and wealth is evil.  And apparently, like Ocasio-Cortez, Bregman believes this accumulation justifies a beating with canes, lashes, chains, and anything he can find to support his ‘Utopian Society’ wherein everyone is living in Paradise.  That is, everyone as long as they support Communism.

Interestingly, despite having authored 4 books before the age of 30, and having been lauded with prominence and recognition for his Socialist ideology, little information can be garnered about Bregman other than his writing, there is nothing about his personal life, where he lives, his net worth, his salary, his taxes…, his friends, or funders.   In fact, it could be said that he is ‘hiding’, like Sanders, so as to not divulge that he himself is a possibly a millionaire worthy of a lashing, a cane, and a shrewing.

An Ocasio-Cortez documentary fetched $10 million.   How much did Bregman earn from his four books, or from his history as writing for The Washington Post, BBC, and De Correspondent?  I imagine it is a fair guess, that his grooming has catapulted him into the millionaire class that he so viciously berates.

But he is emphatically parallel in his visions of open borders and paradise lala land as is our own airhead, Ocasio-Cortez.

SO lets have some fun and just play a bit with the reality of numbers!

A 15 hour work week making $15 per hour which is far above the average in the EU which is roughly in the $9.50 range, would mean a person made $300 per week or $15,000 per year.  In that event, a house price on average would have to be in the range of $40,000, a car would have to sell for $2,500 or less, food prices would tank, gasoline prices would be about 50cents a gallon, the cost of a haircut, alcohol, clothes, children, and everything else would have to be $-0-.

If all these things cost $-0-, then manufacturing will dwindle, supply will evaporate and a depression will result that will require FDR to come to the rescue and raise taxes to pay for the freebies that aren’t available because everyone moved to another country.

It was only a few decades ago that the cabal sought to indoctrinate us with the pop music culture of The Beatles.  They espoused socialism, equality, open borders, love everyone… until they began to make money.   Suddenly, they were making songs about The Tax Man!   They were denouncing their British citizenship where taxes gouged the wealthy, and moving their wealth into havens, protected from the nasty Socialists.

Bregman and Ocasio are the recreation of John Lennon, but instead of making them the pop culture anihillists, they are making them the political pop culture in a last ditch effort to rebrand Communism as “Paradise”.  Using young newbiles seems to be the trend.

And given that our education system has tanked to such an extent, many a college graduate have the acumen of an eighth grader, and Ocasio and Bregman would seem to have such degrees.  They know nothing about the Bolsheviks, nothing about the reality of Communism as it has continuously played out in just the last 100 years, nor do they seem to have any finger in the Dyke of Society, how it works, how the well-oiled mechanizations come into a sort of ecological symbiosis.

The problem?

The John Lennon’s became republican as their wealth ricocheted.   Lennon was executed when he ‘supposedly threatened to expose the deep state’. And Hollywood vamped on – like deer in headlights, what???  Their own intellectual capacity caught between porn, sex addictions, drugs, and fried brain=cells.

So.  Did Tucker Carlson lose it?  Yes.   Can a person who is capable of seeing the log in their own eye recognize it as such?  That is debatable.   Even the best would seem to judge quite harshly when their own eye is bleeding.

And I personally know – many.

 

Medicare For All! Another Subrogation By The New World Order

Medicaid enrollees now represent 21% of the entire US population.  The Census Bureau estimates the US poverty rate at roughly 11%.  That would indicate that 10% of the US population is on the Medicaid Program paying nothing for a service they are not eligible to receive – roughly 35 million people, according to a study out of UC Davis.

As of 2016, the average cost of healthcare per person in the US surpassed $10,000 annually.  That would transpose to 35 million people getting the benefits of $10,000 in healthcare for a total spending of $350,000,000,000. Who is paying?   You and I.  These costs contribute to the untenable healthcare crisis in the US that is described as Socialist medicine.

Medicare was created in 1966.   Within four years the cost of healthcare immediately began to accelerate, rising 800% over the next 40 years.  As a result, Medicare revenue generated from an employee’s payroll now covers roughly 1/3 of the cost.  The rest is ‘deficit spending’.   Today there are roughly 30 active doctors per 10,000 patients.  In 1965 there were roughly 15 active doctors per 10,000 patients, meaning we doubled the number of doctors.

Therefore, the argument that the cost of healthcare is directly attributable to the scarcity of supply of doctors – would on the surface appear – false.

Medicaid was created simultaneously to provide healthcare to those who had need but no resources.  Medicaid is fully funded by US taxpayers through the Federal government – it is universal healthcare – however, those it serves pay $-0- into the system.   ‘Legally’ a legal immigrant may not collect on Medicaid until they have been a resident for five years.  However, in reality, Medicaid is one of the most corrupt, fraudulent organizations within the US government’s socialist system, implemented by Democrat President Johnson.

“Fraud, abuse and waste in Medicaid cost states billions of dollars every year, diverting funds that could otherwise be used for legitimate health care services. Not only do fraudulent and abusive practices increase the cost of Medicaid without adding value – they increase risk and potential harm to patients who are exposed to unnecessary procedures. In 2015, improper payments alone— totaled more than $29 billion according to the Government Accountability Office.”

But that isn’t the only driver of healthcare costs that are now anywhere from 3x to 8x that of other developed countries, and rising.  Why?

Simple supply and demand may prove the answer.

Over the last two decades, the Pac-man merger and acquisition of hospitals has been phenomenal, averaging roughly 40 to 140 deals per year that swallowed between 88 to 300 hospitals per year.    Less hospitals – less competition – higher prices.

But it isn’t just hospitals gaining traction, it is Big Pharma companies too who are creating monopolies that appear to be leading the sheep into a nationalized healthcare system whether we want to or not, wherein only One will remain.

During Obama’s tenure, there were 25 Big Pharma merger/acquisitions that were valued over $10 billion.   The purchasers were predominantly US and German, and the sellers were nearly exclusively US.

These consolidations eliminate basic competition allowing for massive increases in cost that is not necessarily trickled down to physicians, and emphasizes what would likely happen if the US were pushed into a Medicare for all scenario.

But it isn’t just Healthcare.

Between 2011 and 2019, there were 46 mergers valued over $20 billion each, six of those were valued over 100 billion, and the largest targeted for this year is valued at $442 billion.  This decade has accounted for more mergers than the previous four decades combined – and the decade is not yet over. 

These mega-conglomerate companies not only determine the price we pay for goods and services, medical care and procedures, they control the election funding, and thus the election results.  They control our media, and what we think, and they control the education that our children receive K-12 and throughout college.

For decades the reason politicians continue to enter office broke and leave office mega-millionaires is because they are ‘incentivized’ by the mega-conglomerates which are more than happy to make a hefty deposit into a Swiss, or Cayman, or Bermuda Bank account that can not be traced.

The Bigger Plan…

Whether the Protocols of Zion are ‘authentic’ or plagiarized, doesn’t really matter given that the content still defines the means by which an Order could gain control of the World.  In order to initiate the New World Order, certain pieces of the puzzle have to align perfectly including; control of the money – Federal Reserve System, control of the media – propaganda and censorship, abolition of The Constitution, elimination of religion, creation of internal societal chaos, institution of government and personal debt, untenable taxation, liberalism, introduction of greater criminal element – ISIS, Al Qaeda, and the installation of the Mexico Wall, the nullification of Education – college graduates whose education is comparable to an eighth grader, and the ultimate return to a global Kingship or Monarchial rule – (could BREXIT disrupt the UK Monarchy?)…

Control of the Healthcare system, which has already been done in terms of Medicare and Medicaid, provides two separate functions, subjugation of the people and elimination of those who are not willing to accept this right of passage of the chosen ones allowing the social order to be implemented so as to erect the throne.  In other words, submit or die.

While the actual Protocols are subject to controversy and uncertain authorship they were written more than a century ago and accurately reflect the evolution of the US, the EU, and much of the world and thus deserve to be evaluated from the standpoint that they provide us with an outline of what is being calculated so that we can combat its ultimate full implementation.

You can’t fix something you don’t know is broken.  And The Protocols give us a blow by blow insight so that we can not decry ‘ignorance’ because it has been thoroughly and concisely outlined for all to read – should you choose. 

To claim it is simply a conspiracy contributes to the illusion.

UK saysTrump Demonizing Socialist Democrats…

The new Media Meme circulating throughout the US and EU is that Republicans are ‘demonizing Democrats as being Socialists, baby killers and anti-Semitic.   But, they are.  So it isn’t demonizing, it is reporting facts. 

Even the very non-independent, Independent UK Telegraph, has jumped on this rather bizarre twisted assertion claiming that Trump set it in motion at his SOTU address when he stated that America will not succumb to Socialism.   Of course, Democrat/Socialists are quick to point out that the US already has socialist agencies within its ranks including the US military, welfare, Medicare, and Medicaid.   And to some extent this is true, even Congress is socialist, they collect a wage for doing nothing.  But it is also worth noting who voted in these socialist programs and why.

Medicare and Medicaid are relatively new having been created in 1966 under the auspices of Lyndon Johnson, Democrat.  Since then the cost of healthcare has risen 800%.  Well golly-gee, that worked well.  And despite arguments that doctor supply triggered the rise in costs, the supply of doctors has doubled per 100,000 legal citizens in this same time period.  Well go figure…

Welfare was a part and parcel of The New Deal signed into law by Roosevelt, a Democrat, through Executive Order, bypassing Congress because, well, there was no way in tarnation it would have ever passed otherwise!

Congressional salaries didn’t even exist until 1855 when Democrat President, Franklin Pierce, a proponent of slavery, a lawyer who was sworn into office by pledging his allegiance to a law book instead of the Bible, effected a relatively lucrative salary to Congress which – stuck.  Only to be ‘doubled’ by Democrat President Andrew Johnson in 1865.  Halleluja!

Of course, the point of the UK Independent article was to ‘demonize’ Trump by claiming that Republicans are demonizing Democrats, and well, it becomes the Demon Party ticket.

Of course the entire article emerges as rather snarky and wimpishesque as it miffs about the bad, bad deplorables who are calling the Democrats Socialists and baby killers, and after two judo years of annihilating Trump – they just can’t stand suddenly finding themselves the – target.   It reminds me of Macron.

The fact that the Democrats have rallied behind late state abortion/infanticide, and increased Socialist agendas, seems to allude the author’s brain realm.  The fact that the Socialist organizations instituted in our government were done at the behest of Socialist/Democrats, would also seem to allude the – author.

However, I am left with One Socialist organization in the US that bears discussion – the military.

The history of an organized military dates back to 2700 BC, which would coincide with the development of trade and travel and borders, but most specifically Sumer (Iraq) and Elam (Iran) as they battled for supremacy.    Dynasties rose and fell according to their military aggressions, supported by their monarchial rule.   I suppose in that essence they were always supported by their respective governments.  But it differs in philosophy from the concept of Socialism in that they, the military, perform a very self sacrificing service for a small pittance of change – whereas welfare and ‘social programs’ are all about giving money to those who contribute – nothing.

Back to the UK Independent article demonizing Trump for demonizing Socialist Democrats.

The Alice in Wonderland Green Deal issued by Ocasio-Cortez was simply – well, Alice in Wonderland, and yet according to the non-independent Independent, it was endorsed by 70 Democrats in the House and 12 in the Senate.   Which makes them – Socialists.  Not sure why that isn’t a relative scientific numeric fact-thingy…

So we are calling a spade a spade, and they don’t like it, and instead they call it demonizing?

In the end all this reveals that even some of the more simplistic journalism isn’t even attempted by ‘journalists’ lest they discover that Socialism has multiple definitions – those who work and sacrifice for their wage – and those who do nothing and get forever freebies.   The Socialist programs instituted by the Democrats were created to dummy down the population as a whole, people were given handouts to do – nothing.  The military was created to defend, honor, and sacrifice their ‘everything’ for the people.  As such, the comparison is hugely – remote.

NOT THE SAME.  And I am more than miffed that this travesty of definition has been so morphed and spoiled by the Liberal/Socialist/Democrat individuals…  into a wimpy miff-faced, you hurt my feelings after two years of absolute hate filled chaos logged and lodged at Trump and anyone who supports our President, that the people seem to submit to the failed definition, including politicians who supposedly managed Harvard degrees despite their poverty upbringing!

How can that possibly be?   I think I’ll have to ask the Wizard.   Because, surely, only the Wizard could possibly know the answer…

POOHAH!

 

PELOSI: White Suffragists… Left Abortionists

The Women in White at the SOTUS event would like to claim that they are simply “Suffragettes” fighting for the rights of women against Trump, who they claim represents their demon.  While the Suffragettes wore white ‘on occasion’, it was also a symbol of the KKK, and the pedophile, rapist, faith healer John of God who demanded everyone who entered his temple of healing in Abadiania, Brazil wear only white. 

The Suffragettes of the US and Uk in early 1900’s had one calling demand, the right to vote.  There were two factions, both included only white women, one faction employed radical, chaotic means, and the other faction promoted peaceful protest and written appeals.   The militant suffragettes used physical violence, arson, and damage to support their cause which ultimately led to hurting the Liberal Party’s reputation and losing their cause.   When WWI began, the movement was tabled completely as women focused on the war effort.  It wasn’t until four years after WWI that suffrage was partially granted by the UK to women over 30 and not until 1928 that all women were granted the right to vote.  In the US the right was granted in 1920 under then President Wilson.  Wilson was bedridden as of October 1919 due to a severe stroke which greatly affected his health and mental acuity.  His wife, Edith, became the defacto ‘president’ and the granting of the power to the right to vote was likely her doing.

Since the abolition of the Suffrage Movement, women have appealed for a variety of rights including ‘reproductive rights’.   It is this right that is frequently quoted as the bain of Trump and all conservatives, and the squeal of all Spocialists and Liberals.   The World Health Organization defines reproductive rights as follows:

Reproductive rights rest on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health. They also include the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence.”

Nowhere in this definition is ‘abortion’ defined as ‘reproduction’, because it quite simply isn’t a part of the act of reproduction.

When and where did abortion gain traction?

Interestingly, it was introduced in Russia during WWI with the Bolshevik Revolution.   Under Bolshevik rule, Russia became the first country in human history to provide free abortions in state run hospitals as of October 1920.  In the US, Socialist Margaret Sanger has been labeled the mother of abortion as she was the founder of Planned Parenthood.  In fact, it was Mary Calderone, a physician who worked at PP in the 1950’s, who advocated for abortion, sex education for children as young as 5, and sexual promiscuity earning her the award as Humanist Of The Year by The American Humanist Association in 1974.  Her husband, Frank Calderone, was chief administrative officer at the World Health Organization.  The American Humanist Association is a non-profit that advocates secularism and advances the concept of ‘the greater good’ which is a Socialist/Communist meme.  Its past president, David Niose has been a writer and blogger for Psychology Today, Washington Post, BBC, Salon and Huffington Post.

Neither Sanger or Calderone actually conducted abortions at Planned Parenthood.

It wasn’t until 1970 when then Planned Parenthood president, Alan Guttmacher, opened the first legal abortion facility in New York.  The facilities were called abortoriums.   As the president of The Eugenics Society, Guttmacher’s primary concern dealt with a means to correct over-population.  Prior to the legalization of abortion, Planned Parenthood had about 42 centers, however, with legal application the number of facilities jumped to 100 with Ellen Fairchild and Dr. Jeff Penfield having the ‘honor’ of conducting the first legal abortions for Planned Parenthood. Their goal was to perform 100,000 per year in New York City.

The initial funding came from the Rockefellers, The Scaife Mellon Trust, and an anonymous donor.   But it wasn’t long before government funding from Health and Human Services was added to the burgeoning budget in 1971 by Richard Nixon under the premise that government funds would not be allocated to abortion, but instead to family planning and birth control.  Today, Bill Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Buffett Foundation and the Turner Foundation make sure abortions are liberally covered.

During the Obama tenure, Planned Parenthood received tremendous grants from the government with the caveat that they help promote Obamacare.   Follow The Money.  And despite finding that Planned Parenthood was indeed selling human body parts, the courts under Obama and the Socialist Liberals determined that it was not illegal because they did not make a profit.  Within their non-profit 501©(3) status, they are prohibited from spending funds on any political campaign.  Not to be deterred, they simply set up a PAC, fund it liberally, and spend upwards of $6-$7 million per year on Democrat candidates.

Ironically, sitting Chair for Planned Parenthood is Joe Solmonese, former president of Human Rights Campaign.   Cecile Richards, formerly Deputy Chief of Staff to Nancy Pelosi is a former president of Planned Parenthood, and current president, Leana Wen, who served as a fellow for World Health Organization and The Department of Defense, and like David Niaose, Wen blogs for Psychology Today and the Huffington Post.

In essence, this is the white Suffragist Movement of the Nancy Pelosi Party today – a party that feels they represent ‘all women’ and wear the KKK white to prove their solidarity and female nationalism, rooted in Bolshevik Ideology – Socialism – Eugenics – De-Population – Secular Stoicism – and Sexual promiscuity.