Foundations Archives

Ever wonder how Big Pharma came to be Big Pharma? Who started the spoils of war? For what purpose?

In the early 1900’s over 50% of US doctors practiced a form of holistic medicine using knowledge from American Indians, the Europeans and the Chinese. And along came a spider…

The name of the spider was John D Rockefeller. At one point he controlled 90% of all oil in the US, is considered to be the first billionaire, and was an advocate of Social Darwinism, which has its basis in Nazism and socialism.

In 1900, researchers discovered petrochemicals from which the first plastic was made in 1907 – Bakalite. A true megalomaniac, Rockefeller saw the monopolistic opportunity given his vast control of oil, to create two additional fortunes; medical pharmaceuticals, and plastics to eventually include rubber.

In order to create that monopoly and rid himself of the competition, meant altering the view of doctors and patients who supported holistic medicine. So, Rockefeller began a campaign to villianize the snake oil salesmen. He hired Andrew Carnegie to tour the US and report on his findings of hospitals and the medical community at large. This led to the preparation of the Flexner Report which stated that a complete overhaul was necessary as well as a centralized system. The concept is reminiscent of Open Society doctrine: bring terror and doom to the people – and offer a solution- Big Pharma. Cures were discouraged, and diseases were capitalized on.

Hospitals were shut down, holistic doctors were imprisoned, and $100 million (which would equate to about $2.6 billion today) was donated to recreate the medical field and the researchers, scientists and professionals within them.

In 1902, The General Education Board was created with an initial grant from Rockefeller of $1 million. The purpose was to wipe out any memory of holistic medicine and replace it with Pharmaceutical tinctures by establishing medical schools under the control and auspices of Rockefeller. Ultimately he foot $180 million toward that goal. All other universities and research centers that supported holistic medicine were barred from receiving funds and eventually shuttered.

The General Education Board was passed by Congress under Teddy Roosevelt thereby enabling federal funding. Their claim that they eradicated ‘hookworm’ is a tremendous misnomer, however it did manage to become an historical landmark for the ultimate eruption of pharmaceutical medicine. They created a false positive. Today, that is essentially what the pharma industry continues to spew – false positives so as to create a market for additional drugs to fix the side effects of the ‘other’ drugs.

Today hookworm is still quite prevalent throughout the world, and the most definitive prevention is – wear shoes.

In 1939 a drug alliance was formed between the German company IG Farben (Bayer) and Rockefeller: “Auschwitz was the largest mass extermination factory in human history. However, few people are aware that Auschwitz was a 100% subsidiary of IG Farben. On April 14, 1941, in Ludwigshafen, Otto Armbrust, the IG Farben board member responsible for the Auschwitz project, stated to board colleagues:

“our new friendship with the SS is a blessing. We have determined all measures integrating the concentration camps to benefit our company.”

Thousands of prisoners died during human experiments, drug and vaccine testing. Before longtime Bayer employee and SS Auschwitz doctor Helmut Vetter was executed for administering fatal infections, he wrote to his bosses at Bayer headquarters:

“I have thrown myself into my work wholeheartedly. Especially as I have the opportunity to test our new preparations. I feel like I am in paradise.”

Because of it’s Nazi image, after WWII, IG Farben was dissolved and rebranded as: General Mills, Kellogg, Nestle, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Procter and Gamble, Roche and Hoechst (Sanofi-Aventis).

In 1930, Chase Bank bought Equitable Trust Company of NY whose largest shareholder was John Rockefeller Jr. This joint venture made Chase the largest bank in the world.

Today, the Rockefeller empire in tandem with JP Morgan Chase, own 50% of the Big Pharma industry in the US. The US accounts for over 50% of all global pharma sales. And the industry is the second largest manufacturer after arms and weapons. It is estimated the global pharma market will reach $1.17 trillion in 2021.

Rockefeller and his son created the Rockefeller Foundation in 1913. Today, the foundation is managed by Matthew Bishop who is also the editor for The Economist, a Rothschild publication.

Rockefeller, JP Morgan, and Kuhn Loeb and Company, which later became Lehman, counseled with Nelson Aldrich to form the Federal Reserve System in – 1913. In addition, they were instrumental in establishing a federal income tax despite previously declaring such a thing was – communistic. Aldrich’ daughter was married to one of Rockefeller’s sons. At the time, Kuhn Loeb was run by Jacob Schiff whose grandson married Al Gore’s daughter in 1997.

David Rockefeller, grandson to David Sr., was the CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan (which became JP Morgan Chase). Today JP Morgan’s assets are worth over $2.727 trillion. Chase has a strong presence in Hong Kong – and thus maintaining its sovereignty from China is paramount. They are headquartered in London and advocate against BREXIT.

Like Rockefeller and Gates, most of these gigantic pharmaceuticals and banks have since created tax exempt foundations wherein they donate massive amounts of their corporate shares to not only avoid income taxes and capital gains taxes, but estate taxes. All while supporting the legislature that created and instituted the Federal Income Tax and The Federal Reserve.

In essence, pharma, banking, liberal agendas, and their roots are traceable. While the web is enormous, it is definable. If we desire to open our eyes and see!

The Supreme Court refuses to define what is ‘religion’. If there is no legal definition, then how can Atheists assert they are not a religious organization. And how can an atheist organization obtain charitable foundation status? According to the IRS, “private foundations generally support other public charities or other foundations with grants.” However, there is status within the context of ‘educational’. This would only be available if it is to ‘make the public aware’, the moment the actions become politically motivated then the status has been breeched.

Murky is as murky does: “Rev. Rul. 68–263, 1968–1 C.B. 256, holds that the publication of material which discredits particular institutions and individuals on the basis of unsupported opinions and incomplete information about their affiliations is not educational.”

A foundation’s attempts to discredit Christians, Christian beliefs and churches would seem to be a – breech.

A quick overview of some of the form 990’s filed by these organizations shows some discrepancies or oddities. For example, one organization had one employee whose annual compensation was roughly 40% of donations, their cost for accounting services was exceedingly high, and their ‘consultants’ cost was also worrisome. The statement of time spent per week working for the organization was 105 hours – that would equate to 15 hours per day 7 days per week.

Another foundation whose contributions totalled $3.88million in 2013 holds a “Cash Balance” in their asset section of well over $11million. I’d say they were not spending their charitable contributions very well if they have accumulated such a ‘profit’. Their revenue for 2013 was $3,878,938 and their spending was $2,163,375 leaving an annual profit margin of 44%! That’s a lot of profit for a non-profit!

Could these foundations be construed to be ‘educating’ for the purpose of lobbying for a particular political outcome? “Exemption under IRC 501(c)(3) is precluded for those organizations which are substantially engaged in attempting to influence legislation…”

Is ‘educating’ people to convert to atheism – proselytizing?

Proselytize: to recruit or convert to a new faith, belief or cause… When these foundations use the media to denounce religion and the church and provide the option to convert to atheism, they are now the proselytizer.

At what point does proselytizing become harassment? When is freedom of speech breeched? The legal definition of freedom of speech is: “to express beliefs and ideas without unwarranted government restriction.” So if a person wants to announce their belief, it is an expression. But when does this concern the separation of church and state? It doesn’t because it is superceded by the Constitution which declares, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.”

Therefore, making a law that abridges this freedom of speech, such as invoking separation of church and state, is unlawful, and the First Amendment shall take priority.

And ad in a newspaper harshly condemns Catholicism. So does ‘expressing or sharing’ your faith qualify as proselytizing? Legally, no. Because then it would make every atheist potentially criminal for even stating they are atheist – which is their ’cause’ or ‘faith’.

This has become such an explosive issue of late that it bears discussion. The legal definition states: atheism is the belief that gods do not or can not exist. The problem is the use of the word ‘belief’. The definition of ‘belief’ is; confidence in the truth or existence of something that is not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof. Given that an atheist can not ‘prove’ the belief that there is no God, their faith is a belief.

For a time atheists were actively seeking status as a religion, however, when the ramifications of this became apparent, they backed off. As a religion, no material in school could refer to the non-existence of God, no theory of evolution could be taught, discrimination cases would be launched, and science would have to be revealed as a ‘theory’ of faith. The concept was dropped immediately.

Why do people become atheists? The resounding answer is because they feel that God is not keeping the world safe and pure, and therefore He must not exist. Of course, this statement defers to ‘free will’. God created Adam and Eve with free will. Within this freedom, they sinned. We still have free will, we are free to sin or not to. Our sins create an unsafe and impure world. God wants us to be pure, but He can’t force us, he cries when we sin, it brings great grief. Grief is born of Love.

When did atheism become so far flung in your face antagonistic, arrogant and smug? Because it didn’t used to be so. I had a friend who said she objected to reciting in school, “…one nation under God…”. Okay, then don’t say it. At issue is the notion that we cater to the one instead of to the eight. At issue is the fact that 12% of the US population identify themselves as ‘atheists’.

Personally, I take no issue in people who desire to identify as Atheist, or Buddhist, or Hindu, or whatever they prefer. I take issue with the constant harassment and unethical attacks perpetrated against Christians so as to make us follow the doctrine of your nothingness. I take issue with the ridiculous idea that suing is the answer to all your problems. I take issue with the notion that you are so self consumed that it is all about you. It is hypocritical and bullying. Every blank, empty wall space that is not covered with religious identity is virtually the identity of Atheism.

At issue is the notion of tolerance and the absolute intolerance of atheists in their pursuit of emptiness for all.