WORLD TRADE WAR: TRUMP WINS

The EU Commission is backtracking their previous rejected deal with Theresa May and claiming that the no-deal BREXIT really means the rejected deal that gave them $46 billion is the best solution for all… according to Mina Andreeva, a spokesperson.

Certainly $46 billion is a whole lot better than the $9 billion they would likely get in the Johnson no-deal deal.   Of course, resurrecting a ‘rejected’ deal would legally be starting from scratch.   But in the mélange of chaos, the EU Commission would seem to be grasping and gasping – albeit too late.

All economic indicators now rally behind an impending recession for Germany. Given they are the stalwart economy behind the EU, where Germany goes, everyone else follows.

The primary cause of Germany’s implosion is trade not BREXIT.   Industrial output has tanked, primarily in the auto and machine parts industries. Merkel’s outright refusal to negotiate a fair trade with the US having been advised that in so doing she could create a German recession – is simply corrupt.

But allies can sometimes reveal the wolf behind the mask.   Germany is not a US ally, Germany milked the US economy for decades.

The US/China trade war tipped the balance, and Germany remained staunch and unmoving.

Timing is everything.

If the UK remainers win, the UK will derail with Germany and France.   They will be boarding a sinking ship. Short-sighted, ramping up trade with the US would be an economic win.   But sometimes, pride and principle are fervent manufacturers of destruction.

While the socialists in the EU argue against Trump’s tariffs, they seem to forget that Trump offered a zero tariff exchange which Germany and the EU snubbed.   Is the EU working for the people?   It would seem not.   And like the rejected BREXIT deal that they want to suddenly reinstate, a zero tariff trade with the US may be the no-deal deal.

Is it the trade deal or is it the ally that wasn’t?

While rejecting the US zero trade deal, the EU simultaneously agreed to zero tariff’s with Japan.   The wolf showed his face.  And the ally that was, revealed it’s true corruption.  The EU wanted an imbalance and it served them well for 30 years.

The US trade balance was at zero up until 1976.   The following 15 years saw the trade balance dip and trough before coming back to zero.   Between 1991 and 2010, the trade balance tanked! Why?

Clintonomics.

Clinton lowered US tariffs which ultimately destroyed US ability to compete in the export and trade markets, particularly with China.   Because while the US lowered its tariffs, other countries did not follow suit which would have been the job of the WTO…   The World Trade Organization, which was originally the General Agreement on Tariffs and Tax, was created to provide an equality, a balance of tariffs among all member countries. Apparently, that nondiscrimination balance didn’t apply to the US.

When Clinton lowered the tariff rate in the US trade disparities began to escalate rapidly to the detriment of the US. In fact, it was a binge selloff with the US trade balance going from zero to -900billion with the speed of a Lamborghini on a German autobahn!

Prior to this binge selloff, US small businesses were a growing, the economic boom of entrepreneurship expanded significantly.   Mom and pop stores changed the face of the US.   But with the advent of Clintonesque cheap imports, these small businesses began to shutter, unable to compete.   The Walmarts of the world took over increasing the trade balance even more as Chinese goods became the mainstay.   And middle class shrunk like Alice.

In 1980 small business start-ups represented 12% of all US companies and employed 4% of workers. Today those numbers are halved. Those companies were The American Dream. That Dream died when Clinton lowered tariffs despite advice from both parties that such a move would destroy US businesses. The World Trade Center obviously did nothing to balance the discrepancies in countries tariffs, and have proven to be a truly non-essential entity.

Back to BREXIT.

The creation of new trade partners invoking a zero tariff policy is the ultimate free-trade deal.   It is the deal that is now in effect with Mexico and Canada. Today China has slipped to third place in US imports with Mexico rising to number 1 and Canada to number 2.   Expanding their economies, Trump’s zero tariff trade is picking up the slack of China imports while contracting their economy.  It is a non-tax trade.

Adding the UK, would provide them with a backstop and relieve the angst of impending doom and gloom that the naysayers of BREXIT fear.  Trump and Johnson have already made arrangements to soften the initial BREXIT wind and create a sovereign economy without the welfare payouts to the EU.

It is change.   Change requires stamina and patience. Fear will only forebode chaos.

Boris Johnson: King Charles I – treason or hero?

Boris Johnson is now being compared to Charles I who was tried and executed for treason.   Oddly, what the media neglects to understand is that Charles’ ‘treason’ was religiously based during the era in which the Puritans and the Catholics were at odds and Charles lean toward Arminian belief in ‘free will’ and Catholicism was deemed – heretical. 

In essence, Charles came up against his parliament and ultimately imprisoned them given their Puritan views were becoming more and more vehement against Charles religious opinions.   The rumblings of assassination were eminent.  Their rule was dissolved, and Charles presided as Monarch over England, Scotland and Ireland without a parliament for 11 years.

While those opposed to BREXIT are asserting that Boris Johnson is implementing a dictatorship coup, in truth he is fighting for The People who voted for BREXIT and against the insane infighting within a corrupt parliament that has dragged on since 2016 with absolutely no result.

Theresa May’s legacy obliterated, Johnson vowed to uphold the majority vote.   Corbyn and the Soros agenda want a ‘new and improved’ referendum which will likely be rigged.   The obvious question being – why? Why would a new referendum be necessary when there is no allegation of impropriety in the first?

Ultimately, Charles was tried for treason despite the House of Lords objections. The Rump Parliament self declared their power and right to trial and execution.   The charges held Charles acted for his sole purpose in igniting the English Civil War. However, the war was a power play, and the execution of Charles was upheld later to be without merit.

In fact the Rump Parliament, the Puritans, perpetrated ‘a coup’.

If Corbyn and the never BREXITeers were to read the history of Charles I, they might find it necessary to backtrack on their assertion against Johnson given the coup was not invoked by Charles, but by Oliver Cromwell, head of the English Army and a devout Puritan.

Winston Churchill called Cromwell a military dictator. His tolerance of English and Irish Catholics was considered genocidal.

The article in The Guardian by John Rees, completely omits the most relevant frame of the rule of Charles I which was ‘religious freedom’.   He provides a very superfluous narrative recounting a ‘radical mood’ and masses of Londoners.   In fact, the ‘radical mood’ was the Puritans desire to eradicate the Catholics. As in genocide.

Charles I would actually be a somewhat positive declaration in that regard. He advocated to rid his parliament of the radicals, so that his duties as King and warrior could be officiated.

Johnson’s parliament is incompetent. They have demonstrated that fact for the last 3 years.   They are incapable of making a decision with respect to BREXIT and thus have done absolutely nothing during their past three year tenure as a government whose duty is to work for the people.   They have fought, cursed, and been brought to forcible eviction with flailing fists.   The English gentleman – has died.

Instead Rees invokes the claim that businesses demand a deal.  Actually, businesses have already prepped for a no-deal, they’ve had 3 years to do so!

John Rees claims that the Tory-Brexiteers did not vote for a Trump-Johnson no deal.  Which is true.  BREXIT quite simply was a vote to stay or leave the EU.   There was no talk of trade deals, costs, blackmail by the EU Commission, or fees.   That is, until the EU realized they lost and they were up shitake creek!   With 72% turnout, Leave won.   And Remainers act much like Hillary, unable to accept their loss.

With three years now wasted, Boris Johnson is effecting the vote of the people amidst a somewhat convoluted EU Commission attempt to extort money from the UK in an effort to convince them that leaving isn’t worth the cost.  But the people are weary of an ineffectual parliament and want to go on with their lives.

Enter Trump. Trump offers Boris logistical trade deals to help take the smack out of the bite. And the Leavers are hysterical!   Why? Because their argument just tanked. I’m surprised they haven’t called Boris a racist, or Hitler, perhaps that will be their next comical ploy…

In essence, in order for the UK economy to get its footing back, a hard BREXIT is the only way that can be effected. They have floundered in limbo for too long.   With other EU countries flailing miserably in their own economic woes, the EU Commission has lost its position of power. Having rejected every offer brought to the table, they had no intention of ever accepting anything less than a new referendum in which the people voted to stay.

They lost their poker hand and had no more chips.

Know when to hold em, know when to fold em, know when to walk away, and know when to run…

It is time to RUN

Fake Political Party – a Chess Game

As the UK is beleaguered in the BREXIT divide, once again the Soros advocates are pushing protests and chaos calling for a ‘re-vote’.   The absurdity becomes laughable when we consider how this might play out.  It is reminiscent of Hillary demanding a re-vote when she lost.  I was a contender, I shoulda won! Therefore shoulda means we need a redo. Imagine the chaos if every year we had to do a  ‘redo’ of every vote the previous year?  Why bother voting?   As we see with BREXIT, it is not about moving forward after The People spoke, it is about two years of fighting about the outcome of the vote – and going nowhere.

The ridiculousness of the UK Parliament insubordination and ineptitude is framed in ‘not making a decision’ and instead voting agreeing that a decision will be deferred to a later time.  Two years have passed – and the latest vote was no exception.

These same ‘lawmakers’ who are truly incapable of actually making any political decision or decisive action, are quick to make sarcastic and defaming remarks about Trump as though they have lost every aspect of moral and ethical decorum.   In fact, their lacking decorum targets what they perceive to be Trump’s lacking decorum…

For example, what has Boris Johnson accomplished during his tenure?   

Well, he voted for the invasion of Iraq only later to demand Tony Blair’s impeachment for the UK’s collusion in invading Iraq.  He went to the Chinese Summer Olympics and offended his hosts.  He continued his journalism career while Mayor despite promising he would not.  He ended London’s oil deal with Venezuela and scrapped inspections of black cabs…  He was for BREXIT and against it and for it and against it.   Blowing wherever the wind blew him.  He has effectively done nothing for 15 years.

He has been hailed by The Economist for his decidedly liberal tendencies despite Johnson claiming he is a conservative.  The Economist is owned by the Rothschilds.

Boris Johnson is the UK’s implant of McCain.

The waters become more and more muddied as politicians are told to switch their affiliation in a subversive means of undermining the party.

Soros infiltrated US Republicans long ago, to think he hasn’t taken over the UK Parliament is short-sighted.  US Republicans that Soros has backed include:  McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John Boehner, Ed Royce, Charles Grassley, Ron Johnson, Cathy Rodgers and Dan Donovan.

ALL of these Republicans have either aggressively spoken out as anti-Trump or voted against his proposals including Iran, North Korea, trade, immigration, etc…

Colorado’s ultra-liberal, John Hickenlooper, and Ohio’s, John Kasich, are in discussion mode to form a ticket together in the 2020 presidential election.  In preparation, Kasich has been vocal about how successful and brilliant he is earning himself star appearances on liberal MSM outlets. He has also chosen to be rather disparaging of Trump regarding the detention of illegal children.

Many people vote by party, without researching anything at all.   So how can one discern who is a fake representative of their party?

More and more it is important to ‘follow the money’, because a politician who is pursuing an agenda, is a politician who has no ethic.  Of course, determining what that agenda is can also be rather difficult.   If the motive is to destabilize, to create chaos and division, that would be a first agenda.  If the MSM is supportive, that would indicate an approved agenda.

Adding to the fray is the hacking issues.   Today it was revealed that Wikileaks released the personal information of all ICE employees.  And so, the MSM has made it a Julian Assange terror attack.   But – what is the agenda?   In the midst of Trump’s zero tolerance for illegal immigration, taking down ICE would support the liberal agenda.  The obvious and logical conclusion is that WikiLeaks has been hacked, compromised.  Assange himself has been said to be in dire health, and the Ecuadorian embassy has said that ‘any communication’ would give them cause to expel him.

Whose agenda has it been for the last two years to take down Julian Assange?

Hillarygate.

She claimed that Wikileaks was partially responsible for her loss.

A party affiliation is meaningless any longer.   Follow the agenda.  Follow the money.  Kasich has penned a book… remind you of anyone else ramping up wealth in order to run for office?  Who else is writing a book?