Fake Political Party – a Chess Game

As the UK is beleaguered in the BREXIT divide, once again the Soros advocates are pushing protests and chaos calling for a ‘re-vote’.   The absurdity becomes laughable when we consider how this might play out.  It is reminiscent of Hillary demanding a re-vote when she lost.  I was a contender, I shoulda won! Therefore shoulda means we need a redo. Imagine the chaos if every year we had to do a  ‘redo’ of every vote the previous year?  Why bother voting?   As we see with BREXIT, it is not about moving forward after The People spoke, it is about two years of fighting about the outcome of the vote – and going nowhere.

The ridiculousness of the UK Parliament insubordination and ineptitude is framed in ‘not making a decision’ and instead voting agreeing that a decision will be deferred to a later time.  Two years have passed – and the latest vote was no exception.

These same ‘lawmakers’ who are truly incapable of actually making any political decision or decisive action, are quick to make sarcastic and defaming remarks about Trump as though they have lost every aspect of moral and ethical decorum.   In fact, their lacking decorum targets what they perceive to be Trump’s lacking decorum…

For example, what has Boris Johnson accomplished during his tenure?   

Well, he voted for the invasion of Iraq only later to demand Tony Blair’s impeachment for the UK’s collusion in invading Iraq.  He went to the Chinese Summer Olympics and offended his hosts.  He continued his journalism career while Mayor despite promising he would not.  He ended London’s oil deal with Venezuela and scrapped inspections of black cabs…  He was for BREXIT and against it and for it and against it.   Blowing wherever the wind blew him.  He has effectively done nothing for 15 years.

He has been hailed by The Economist for his decidedly liberal tendencies despite Johnson claiming he is a conservative.  The Economist is owned by the Rothschilds.

Boris Johnson is the UK’s implant of McCain.

The waters become more and more muddied as politicians are told to switch their affiliation in a subversive means of undermining the party.

Soros infiltrated US Republicans long ago, to think he hasn’t taken over the UK Parliament is short-sighted.  US Republicans that Soros has backed include:  McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John Boehner, Ed Royce, Charles Grassley, Ron Johnson, Cathy Rodgers and Dan Donovan.

ALL of these Republicans have either aggressively spoken out as anti-Trump or voted against his proposals including Iran, North Korea, trade, immigration, etc…

Colorado’s ultra-liberal, John Hickenlooper, and Ohio’s, John Kasich, are in discussion mode to form a ticket together in the 2020 presidential election.  In preparation, Kasich has been vocal about how successful and brilliant he is earning himself star appearances on liberal MSM outlets. He has also chosen to be rather disparaging of Trump regarding the detention of illegal children.

Many people vote by party, without researching anything at all.   So how can one discern who is a fake representative of their party?

More and more it is important to ‘follow the money’, because a politician who is pursuing an agenda, is a politician who has no ethic.  Of course, determining what that agenda is can also be rather difficult.   If the motive is to destabilize, to create chaos and division, that would be a first agenda.  If the MSM is supportive, that would indicate an approved agenda.

Adding to the fray is the hacking issues.   Today it was revealed that Wikileaks released the personal information of all ICE employees.  And so, the MSM has made it a Julian Assange terror attack.   But – what is the agenda?   In the midst of Trump’s zero tolerance for illegal immigration, taking down ICE would support the liberal agenda.  The obvious and logical conclusion is that WikiLeaks has been hacked, compromised.  Assange himself has been said to be in dire health, and the Ecuadorian embassy has said that ‘any communication’ would give them cause to expel him.

Whose agenda has it been for the last two years to take down Julian Assange?

Hillarygate.

She claimed that Wikileaks was partially responsible for her loss.

A party affiliation is meaningless any longer.   Follow the agenda.  Follow the money.  Kasich has penned a book… remind you of anyone else ramping up wealth in order to run for office?  Who else is writing a book?

Manafort -Soros Throwing Decoys at Trump

HOW is this even a story?

The Ukrainian government’s ‘new’ anti-corruption unit has declared that Trump’s campaign officer, Manafort, stole $12 million during the Yanukovych regime when he was working for the Podesta Group.

On these leaked documents which are now archived in the government office of the ‘new and improved anti-corruption unit’ in Ukraine – did his signature appear on any check?

“No. But his name was mentioned 22 times!”

Google is wonderful. Let’s go back in time and review what was being done and said by even our own media:

A. FIRTASH

  1. Firtash, the billionaire Ukrainian associated with Manafort, was also a friend of the President of Ukraine, Yanukovych. Not a crime.
  2. Firtash made his fortune in the ‘notoriously corrupt’ natural gas industry of Ukraine. The SAME notoriously corrupt industry that Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, took control of right after the ‘coup’, whose company is registered in CYPRUS…
  3. When the US backed Yulia Tymoshenko (she thought the US would make her Ukraine’s president after the coup), initiated a lawsuit against Firtash in the US backed by the State Department, and accused him of having paid bribes to officials in India, they (the US) demanded extradition of Firtash from Vienna to the US.
  4. The Vienna courts denied the extradition claiming the US allegations were ‘politically motivated’. The ruling reflected the ‘diminished credibility of the US authorities’.
  5. The Vienna court said that despite numerous requests for verification of the existence of the purported ‘witnesses’, the US refused to comply. Therefore the witnesses were considered fake.
  6. The US request for the arrest of Firtash corresponded to Victoria Nuland’s trip to Ukraine before the coup in which she wanted Yanukovych to sign specific trade agreements. After Yanukovych signed, the arrest warrant was rescinded. After the coup, it was renewed.

B. Pericles Emerging Markets

  1. ALL key persons associated with Pericles seem to have one common denominator: John McCain.C. DERIPASKA

    1. He was off the radar completely until 2006 when the US canceled his entry visa providing  absolutely no reason or evidence for why they did so. In 2009, the FBI allowed visits, but still  refused to provide any explanation. At the time he was attempting to buy Daimler Chrysler.

    2. During his visits Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs were his prominent targets. In 2015 he filed a lawsuit against Morgan Stanley citing trading on insider information to short sell his  company shares (sounds like a Soros ploy). While Morgan Stanley was found guilty on insider trading – the jury found that they had no ‘intent to defraud’.  What?

     

    3.  In 2014, Deripaska filed a lawsuit against Manafort blaiming that the defunct Pericles Group owed him his front money back.  Manafort claimed there was no front money from Deripaska, hence the lawsuit.

    4.  Deripaska is good friends with Nathaniel Rothschild. Rothschild owns a sizable share of the outstanding stock of RUSAL, Deripaska’s aluminum company. It was Rothschild who set up a party on Deripaska’s yacht inviting the UK parliamentary Mandelson and Osbourne, during which Osbourne attempted to solicit a donation to his campaign from Deripaska.  That’s the UK’s problem.

     

    5.  Now we are supposedly taking the word of a supposed organized crime businessman, that has an outstanding lawsuit against Manafort, and ties to the Rothschild/Soros kibutch, without any evidence of misdoings, just allegations?  That makes sense…

D. MANAFORT

Now that all the other stupid allegations are out of the way – it gets really interesting – and actually kinda funny!

Reading Manafort’s bio, he seems to have a particular knack for; reinventing people that want to win elections, making a lot of money that isn’t always taxed, and earning favors as in chits that he can later cash in. In these processes of regrafting a character, it would appear he has little to no concern for politics, as though it was relatively meaningless.

He didn’t work for the Ukraine government because he was hired to reinvent Yanukovych so he could be elected to the government.   Where the Russian/Putin involvement comes in is a mystery – it seems it would simply be defacto given that Yanukovych went on to favor relations with Russia – after he was elected.  And unfortunately, the new and improved government is actually more corrupt than the Yanokovych regime – only then they actually had a country that had  a)  natural gas and b)  black gold – best dirt in the world.

The money laundering?  The allegation that Deripaska is tied to organized crime?  The fact that Deripaska and Manafort may have had an relationship in an investment?  Who cares!   There is absolutely no evidence – these are all flailing words spun like knives from the mouths of wolves.

Red Nation Rising, which has pictures of Soros all over it’s front page wrote this quote and response, ” “My work in Ukraine ceased following the country’s parliamentary elections in October 2014.” Well duh. Yanukovych was overthrown and that tends to put a damper on your corrupt connections.”   

Then later in this RNR article they attempt to give an AHA moment:  “Manafort has not dissolved his company in the Ukraine and his aids have been there this year. Does that sound like he is not involved with the Russians anymore? Nyet.”

Umm, but you just acknowledged that the Russians and Yanukovych don’t rule Ukraine, the US does…  GOOD GRIEF, Charley Brown, get your opinions straight if you can’t manage your facts!

Who Manafort is?  He is Higgins in My Fair Lady, reinventing Eliza Dolittle. And perhaps there are even side wagers from various Pickerings, who don’t think the transformation is possible. While Manafort has played Higgins to many throughout the world for 35 years and will probably continue to do so until he retires or finds some new entertaining passion, the liberal media story is filled with the clatter of half-truths, half-wits and half twits. Please – leave the conspiracy theory frenzy to those who want to unravel truth – not those who want to create it.

And whoever wrote the Democrat whiplash story that flailgates Manafort with the rip roaring title: HAHAHAHA… only serves an embarrassing testimony that he represents the intellect of the party…

In the end, opening this story only serves to open the Pandora Box that is the US instigation of the failed Orange Revolution/coup in Ukraine, the US involvement in the Yanukovych coup, the US controlled Poroschenko, Chocolate King, and of course, the Monsanto Manifesto, not to mention, the Hunter Biden – Devon Archer (Best buds with Sec of State, John Kerry’s stepson) suddenly taking over the natural gas corruption with a Cyprus company, Burisma Holdings.  Which may or may not be affiliated with the same Deripaska Cyprus company attempting to file suit against Manafort’s Pericles Emerging Market company – of course we don’t know because the whole point of a Cyprus company is to hide it in a cloak and mask of darkness wherein no one can know who or what or why…the Dark Shield.

The CIA and FBI are most likely rippling with rage.

You almost want to feel sorry for their bungling of this story … but then, Nah.

 

 

 

 

Footnote: The hahaha guy’s name is “Streiff” with no bio, no full name, someone hiding behind his illiteracy and cowardice. The only relative information I could find? Streiff-Syndrome: a congenital disorder that causes smaller cranial development.