SCIENCE: Ice Age or Global Warming… Pick A Scientist

DNA.   While many believe their DNA traces them to Africa, this is largely an assumption based science, and not a factual based science.   Classic DNA assumes each parent represents 50% of two parents.   But the further back you go the less accurate is the science.   Classic DNA tests for ancestry are simply another sales tool of assumptions – claiming 300 to 1100 years of ‘accuracy’.  

When conducting DNA testing, science starts with the assumption that all homo sapiens evolved from Africa. In fact, the assumption is that all homo sapiens DNA originated from one African ancestor 115,000 years ago!   Oddly, this dating to 115,000 years ago coincides with the assumption of the last great Ice Age which lasted from 115,000 years ago to roughly 10,000 years ago.

Alas, some scientists believe the Ice Age never ended and has been going on for 40 million years, or maybe 2.5 million years…   In other words, science is not a factual detail of data, it is a thought built on maybe’s, could have been, likely, in theory, suppositions, and – I have an idea… And literally no two scientists will agree on much of anything.

According to Mark Thomas, professor of evolutionary genetics in London, “Tracing ancestry beyond 300 years is futile as you only directly inherit DNA from a small fraction of your ancestors – the others are called ‘pedigree ancestors.”

The first known human was Lucy dated 3.2 million years ago.   The first homo erectus was dated as of 2 million years ago.   The means used to date Lucy was based on volcanic ash sediment 8 and 1 meter below her bone fragment using the argon-argon technique.   Radioactive decay rates are based on the last 60 years of changes.   Using this rate, all techniques calculate a linear rate equal to this ratio.   Lucy was not dated, the volcanic ash beneath her bone fragment was. The assumption being that for 3.2 million years her bone never moved from this position or place…

The Point.

Today we are told that literally everything science tells us is an absolute fact even though 20-30,000 other scientists disagree. In fact, there may be 30,000 or more versions of the same ‘fact’.   So which ‘fact’ do we believe?   Because in reality, there is no such thing as a consensus – either a fact is a fact or it is not! It can not be a sortof fact or a maybe fact, or a I think it might be fact.

But that is exactly what we are fed through our propaganda feeding tubes.

Deutsche Welle, citing activists, world leaders and society, is today responding to an IPCC report which states, ‘…something has to change…’.   WOW – what a scientifically researched analysis!

Why? Why does something have to change?   Because earth is heating up to extreme and everyone will die. Using the ever scientific authority of Greta Thunberg, an 18 year old high school dropout with multiple mental issues, she states, “…it (IPCC Report) is a solid summary of the current best available science”.     OUCH!   Scientists are cringing!

And then there is the most authoritarian scientist, John Kerry, stating “The science has been certain for decades,…”  As in 2 decades – because prior to that scientists were absolutely positively convinced we were heading into another apocalyptic Ice Age…

But “Science” tells us we are at the end of a warming trend and the next Ice Age is only years away. In fact, earth’s entire existence is only periodically impregnated with life only to be absorbed into the next deep freeze for millions of years. The primary reason? A change in earth’s axis – according to science.  That axis change is reverse polarization which we are undergoing more rapidly – now.

So which ‘science’ is accurate? The science according to Greta? Or the science according to Scientists?

Friederike Otto, is the climate expert Deutsche Welle cited as determining that climate change today is 100% human caused.   Her expertise is attributable to her PhD in ‘the philosophy of science’.   Her goal is stipulated to be to validate climate models in order to prove that current conditions are human caused.    In other words she begins with her end result and works backward to prove her claim.

These ‘experts’ do not research climate history, causes of historical ice ages, volcanic and planetary shifts, or ANY historical data whatsoever and instead look for accreditation and media attention for their unsupported opinions that supplant Science with Quackery.

The language these organizations espouse when bolstering their acclaim is revealing in their end-game wordplay:   1. We use peer reviewed science, 2.   Our team believes that careful science based assessment is valuable,   3.   We apply a unique scientific approach, 4.   Through extensive liberal media engagement we have helped change the conversation…

One such Project from Otto’s organization, World Weather Attribution, is working within modeling in association with   Prediction!?   WWA believes that Probabilistic Event Attribution is valuable in proving humans caused global warming.

Probabilistic references – algorithms.   When algorithms go HAYWIRE:   1.   In the UK algorithms were used to generate students grades when they were not in school during coVid!   Aka, the input was meager and the output was ‘predicted’.   2.   Bill Gates CoVid modeling algorithm predicted that over 2 million Americans would die of CoVid the first 3 months and over 33 million worldwide – sending massive panic!   3.   ‘experts’ claimed that CoVid would be more deadly than the Spanish Flu which killed over 50million.   According to Fauci – the Spanish flu was neither Spanish nor a flu – but the result of a tainted vaccine mandated by the Rockefeller Institute which induced bacterial pneumonia.

Experts would appear to have the expertise of Greta. As we build toward the end of a warm era and face the next Ice Age, historically, North America and Europe will be an ice sheet – whereas South Africa and South America will be the most habitable.   Basing our means of survival on 60 years of tainted modeling and false algorithms is like premeditated murder.

But it would explain why driving chaos in South Africa so as to vacate the premises for future colonization would appear to be the Present Day Algorithm!

Greta Thunberg: A Ponzi SchemeWith Bill Gates and Soros at the Helm

Ever wonder how much a chartered sailboat with 10 crew crossing the Atlantic might cost? Not to mention the cost of airfare to send the crew home and the cost of airfare and time to return the sailboat to it’s port in Europe?   Likely upwards of $150,000 or more. But hey, Greta Thunberg saved one carbon footprint while creating 30 more…

So where did this humble child get the money? How much is her entire campaign costing?   Who is behind angry, angry Greta?

The list is not new, what is new is that in this instance they are ALL together: Bill and Melinda Gates, Open Society, Apple, Starbucks, Coca-cola, Google, Facebook, Buffett, Bono, Business Roundtable, Bloomberg, Caterpillar Foundation, former PM David Cameron, former Secretary of Treasury Lawrence Summers, Bobby Shriver, Twitter, HBO, Verizon, YouTube, Rolling Stone, Merck etc… etc… etc…

Two companies rule:, and They are interconnected with RED being purchased by ONE.

RED claims they have saved 32 million lives since their founding in 2002, in particular thru Malaria, AIDS and TB – education.

But according to graphs provided by WHO; TB and Malaria cases are lower, but not since 2002, for TB the downward trend began in 1992, for malaria it began in 2000 – and for both the rates have remained relatively stable since then.   AIDS has continued to rise.

The organization ONE claims to be about ending poverty and disease by 2030. The magic year that all politicians proclaim.

RED is all about selling a product through intermediaries while claiming the dollars are fighting disease. GAP, Vanity Fair, The Independent, etc… sell RED products and retain their profit margin. For example a straight donation of $100 to the RED cause might result in about $18 spent for charity.   Corporations make money, shareholders make money all while deducting their charitable gift.   All the while utilizing hundreds of thousands of youth volunteers.

It’s a Hustle of enormous proportions.  And it is all about molding and manipulating the most pliable, uneducated, and naive minds – YOUTH.

And little Greta is a pawn of ONE – albeit a highly paid pawn.

In essence, ONE is a lobbyist group ‘campaigning in the US, Canada, Europe, pounding for media representation, to fight poverty, income inequality and disease.   Nowhere in their form 990 or on their website do they make any claim regarding climate change despite being heavily invested.

According to their Form 990 for 2016, the latest available, their revenue tanked to a mere $16 million from the previous year of over $50million. Their expenses were roughly $36 million of which $6 million was spent on grants and the remainder or 83% was spent on salaries, new construction and design, and overhead. Of the $6 million in grants, $3.5 million of the total grants were made to an ‘affiliate’ of ONE. The remaining amount of the $6.1 million grants was made to their own ‘action lobbying group’, ONE Action in the amount of $2.1 million.   Their fundraising activity lists expenses of nearly $200,000 with $-0- gross receipts, including fees to the LA Entertainment Industry.

In other words, ONE makes no charitable gifts per se to nonaffiliated entities, spends roughly $36 million on expenses including compensation and consulting fees, and supports the cost of manufacturing RED products to be sold at profit by their member companies, such as GAP, Starbucks, etc…, while generating charitable deductions for their partners and paying no taxes.

That’s quite a Ponzi scheme.   All under the guise of helping to eradicate AIDS, Malaria and TB.

The charitable money raised by RED is supposed to be given to the Global Fund, a nonprofit founded with seed money from Bill and Melinda Gates!   Since it’s inception in 2002, the US (the funds largest contributor by far) has given the Global Fund roughly $15 billion out of a total of $46 billion – 32%.   Most of the US contribution came with the approval of Bush and Obama.  Of the total global contribution for 2018 – $6.1 billion, RED contributed $32 million or .5%. The RED contribution is not from the company itself – instead, the corporations who sell RED products contribute 50% of their “Net Profits” from the sale of the products, according to ONE’s website.

What would Greta’s role in all this comprise? Sympathy funding.   ONE’s revenue is covering less than half their expenses. They need new partners and have launched outside their stated IRS and Corporate realm of activity to capitalize on the climate change cult bonanza.

This is who Greta works for.  Everything about her is a ‘creation’, from her appearance, to her script, to her agenda, to her media representation, to her funding.   She is less than a puppet, she is a toy.

Holding her hand is Luisa Newbauer who is the Youth Ambassador for ONE and a member of the Green Party in Germany. It is believed she was first introduced to the clan by Al Gore.  Subsequent to Greta’s rise, her mother received a book deal – it would appear – in exchange for her child.

This is not about climate change, it is not about AIDS, it is not about curing anything, it is about creating wealth pockets, using foundation and NGO tax havens to scheme and skim $$$$$, and promoting an agenda that is no longer simply socialism, it truly has as its end game – Communism.

And we need to stop ALL FUNDING from taxpayer pockets.