World Wildlife Fund: Conservation Ponzi?

Brazil’s president, Bolsonaro, has accused Leonarda Di Caprio of funding an NGO that is complicit in the Amazon fires as arson triggers the cycle need of financial aid.   While the media have widely tabled the allegation as unfounded, the root would seem to revert to the World Wildlife Fund. Mired in extensive allegations of corruption and fraud for over a decade at least, it bears further investigation.

While the World Wildlife Fund may have originally been created for idealistic purposes, it’s role in the environment has slowly evolved into a ‘finance mechanism of swaps and pillages as they sold out to such environmentally unfriendly organizations like – Monsanto.

A cursory list of donors includes; the MacArthur Foundation, Packard foundation, USAID, and Wildlife Conservation Society.   While their names may seem innocuous, their agenda is not. And Bolsonaro’s concerns may be quite valid.

The Packard Foundation is run by his granddaughter and her husband, Franklin Orr, who was Under Secretary For Science and Energy – under Obama.   Their organizations are clearly focused on – over-population, and how to reverse this evolution. Of course, select names on “The List” who are designated to survive would be a who’s who of the wealthy.

After all, there has to be a carrot.   What could make, lure, these people without ethic or morality toward a failed earth?

The notion that they will survive as some super human class.

So what happened to the largest environmental group in the world that caused it to be so mired in controversy?   The Panda.   It hardly represents any action within the organization, it’s focus having shifted from the actual hands-on to the financial reward, or gain that can be levied so easily under the guise of beneficial ownership. Corrupted.   It is like a virus that takes over the host soul and creates new gene cells.   It is nothing compared to what it once was.

I remember well when I was in my post Hippy coming of age era and I was introduced to Greenpeace.   I invited the gentleman into my house and he talked for hours.   And I was hooked.   I had no idea what he was revealing and having a heart I wear on my sleeve, I was completely drawn.

Decades later, WWF has accumulated a veritable laundry list of controversial infractions – all of which lead to one over-riding justification – money.   As such, this once ideological organization has evolved into a Lehman Brother’s subsidiary.   It is nothing more than a clearing house for – money.

And Bolsonaro’s claim begins to gain traction.

Because, you can’t finance a crisis if a crisis doesn’t exist.   So create the crisis so as to perpetuate the finances.   And this would seem to be the crux of Bolsonaro’s claim and the Ponzi scheme manifested by World Wildlife Fund.

Leonardo Di Caprio has no more interest in anything than his own gain however that might be attained.   Too often we forget. Hollywood is composed of actors, playing make believe, faking who they are, and convincing an audience they are real.   Most have little more than an 8th grade education. And yet, they are experts at everything because they played this part once – upon a time. And therefore, presume they are this person, this created persona, with full knowledge of what would be – their education.

It is fantasy.

I think we may soon discover that World Wild Life Fund and its players have indeed manipulated in the witch’s brew of population control, destructive micro-financing, sterilization, and deadly vaccines.

WWF website lists exactly four initiatives

All of which are based on a financial schematic, and have nothing to do with the initial focus of wildlife or even environment, instead it is a for profit, money making scheme that indebts whose who had nothing, with less than nothing, and bulges the pockets of ‘conservation’ organizations.

In Brazil, there are two companies that Bolsonaro mentioned when calling out Di Caprio;   Alter Do Chao and Forest Trends both of which are connected to WWF.

In Bolsonaro’s esteemed belief, these NGO’s are actually conspirators of Amazon arson for the purpose of creating a market for the financial initiatives offered by these WWF adjuncts, which include;   MacArthur Foundation, Packard Foundation, and USAID.

It is really no different than the belief that wars are literally created, and propagandized, by the media so as to line the pockets of a few. WWF is labeled the worlds largest conservation organization with consolidated assets over $500million and annual revenue for 2018 shy of $340million.   The executives are paid handsomely with the CEO, Carter Roberts, of the US entity reporting over $1.45 million in compensation. While they are incorporated in Delaware, the vast majority of their grant making is to foreign countries – all donation names have been ‘redacted’.

Like the racket that NGO’s and Foundations have become – their funding is a mass circle of Ponzi schematics whereby each Foundation donates to another so as to support excessive salaries and little actual philanthropy.

Like The Nature Conservancy where Carter Roberts previously was employed, the WWF Board is composed of a number of elite corporations that are quite removed from conservation and more inclined to making money, including the Leonardo Di Caprio Fouundation, Google, Goldman Sachs, Coca Cola, and individuals connected to petrochemical companies, mining companies, natural gas companies, and individuals currently or formally connected to the UN!

While there are likely a few people who actually are dedicated to climate change ideologies, the phrase has recently been hijacked – again.   It is now “Climate Justice” and includes reparations, and LGBT rights, and ‘legal rights’ for eco-systems.

One such organization has gained traction in the last year, Extinction Rebellion.   Their motto is ‘nonviolent civil rebellion’, which is rather an oxymoronic statement given that rebellion means ‘destruction’ and the creation of chaos.   While its members and advocates routinely cite the need for government intervention in our climate, they don’t actually exert any personal change in their own gad about town delusional activities.   Including the Hollywood elite who defend their excessive flying as necessary for their career – and their excessive use of electricity and other carbon footprint mechanisms.

While they may not effect any positive change, they do manage to make quite a bit of money – to support their own higher education in degrees like ‘effective radical campaigning’.

In alignment with Ocasio Cortez, unions, green anything, except vegetables, and socialist communism for all, these millennial’s have found a niche wherein they can radically up their monetary inflow all while spouting billionaires should be eliminated.

Of course, naked protests are always inserted in their agenda revealing narcissism at it highest altitude!

FYI:   At present;   “World Wildlife Fund is the subject of an investigation by The House Natural Resources Committee according to an article titled, “House Panel Investigates Whether U.S. Funds Anti-Poaching Efforts Linked To Rights Abuses.” 

Nature conservancy:   There have been allegations of The Nature Conservancy obtaining land and reselling it at a profit, sometimes to supporters,[47] who have then made use of it in ways which many perceived as being insufficiently environmentally friendly. The Nature Conservancy argues that the profit from such sales allows The Nature Conservancy to increase its preservation of what the Nature Conservancy claims are more important locations

IN addition there have been numerous sexual harassment charges brought against the Nature Conservancy.

US Student Debt: Ask Bill Gates and New America Foundation – A Ponzi Scheme

Student debt now stands at $1.41 trillion. 70% of college students are in significant debt, 44 million students and graduates. 33% of people over the age of 25 have a bachelors degree or higher.   While it sounds impressive, the percentage is actually lower than it was before student debt was initiated in 1958, before the debt was a federal obligation.   21% of public university’s revenue is made up from tuition and fees, the rest is subsidized.   90% of revenue of private universities is funded through tuition and fees.   The government spends over $80 billion on college students annually which is higher as a factor of GDP than Germany, France, Canada, Japan, Spain, and Italy who provide instate free education.  

What Happened?

Primary education in the US, on average, tops at roughly $13,500 per student per year, funded by taxpayers.   So where is all the money going?   40% pays for pensions. Another 10% is applied to administration, and of course now we have interest on school debt, purchase of buildings, outside services, etc…  How much is actually spent educating?   Pennies.

Blame Betsy Devos… Inane.   She inherited the entire broken system that took 60 years to create!

As of 2018, outstanding education debt had tripled over the previous 10 years!   That would be aka – Obama.   And it would seem interestingly coincidental.   If you want to control the youth – enrage and enwrap them in debt while indoctrinating them into a Socialist agenda of free everything.   I think it is called A Perfect Storm.

While many pundits would cite Germany’s model of free college, they dutifully forget that in Germany, college is a privilege for a select few based on whether the government determines you qualify for college or should instead benefit from ‘trade school’.

While I believe the notion of a trade school is beneficial, when the government makes the determination where you go, it, the government, owns your life.   That is called Communism.

It all fell apart under the Eisenhower introduction of the National Defense Education Act of 1958 which was launched to increase the number of science and math graduates.   Richard Cornuelle saw an opportunity and created United Student Aid Funds.   Private industry would back bank loans on behalf of college students after they exhibited rigorous potential for repayment based on guaranteed jobs upon graduation.   The model was a success! Student loan delinquency was 20 times lower, and job placement was $22.50 per student under the private plan.   Comparatively, the Federal Jobs Corps spent nearly $6700 per student during the same time period. And today that cost is $76,000 per actual placement.

In 1965, despite the success of Cornuelle, President Johnson signed the Higher Education Act, as part of his Great Society Agenda.   As a result, the government began a ferocious scheme to hijack the private institutions student loan programs and in 2000 under Bill Clinton Cornuelle’s vision was bought out by Sallie Mae for the sum of $770 million whereby the Federal government took over a successful private endeavor.

In 1999, the total outstanding student debt stood at $90 billion.   Ten years later, student debt grew by 511%. And the percentage of students graduating with a degree in math or sciences was roughly 20%.  Give it to the government to fail a successful private endeavor.

Today we offer degrees that have absolutely no benefit whatsoever in the job market, that cost the student in loans, that absolve any necessity in obtaining the degree, and further no value.   But hey, colleges want students and will offer whatever it takes to mobilize the thought that without a degree you are nothing… even if the degree is in dog watching.

Even if that degree is in – nothingness.

And still we wonder how it is that a person can graduate with a college degree in ‘communications’ and not be able to find a job outside of hamburger flipper at McDonalds while balancing a loan debt of $100,000?

Once again, the brain drain of this stigma can be found as a perpetual head thump – ‘if you don’t go to college you will make no money – and if you do, you can be a millionaire’.   Of course, many of the brain thumpers – never went to college, but that is rarely observed.

So what is the real point?

Money.   Control. Indoctrination.   And universities are all too eager to Swamp their pockets with this scheme funded – by taxpayers. Ultimately, WE pay for the defaulted loans, WE pay for the scholarships, WE pay the liberal arts degrees that have no inherent value!

Unfortunately today, even our esteemed private foundations that support foundations, that support NGO’s that support government funding of private enterprise – are mired in a clandestine middleman phenomena that basically redirects funds from the cause they claim to support, to the various councils and committees, and board members therein ultimately creating a Ponzi scheme within a Ponzi scheme within a Ponzi scheme so as to divert funds from the actual cause to a host of people with degrees and money from the poor they despair!  WHEW!

All within the pretext that ‘The Government” is helping the disadvantaged.

Lumina Foundation is the successor of Cornuelle’s vision, albeit within a somewhat distorted version of the initial schematic. You see, Lumina’s largest grant to support college education for the needy went to the OECD to fund an ‘analysis of the labor market’. They gave money to the Rockefeller Advisors!   And they have given massive amounts of money to New America Foundation whose executive Chairman includes Google’s Schmidt.

In essence, Foundations are giving the funding to each other, benefiting no one other than themselves, while receiving a non-profit status of NO TAXATION.

So where is our Education money going?

It is lining the pockets of the super wealthy who create Foundations funding their own Foundations. Want to know who is under cup number 1?   Gates.   Clinton.   And once upon a time – the US Department of State.

Greta Thunberg: A Ponzi SchemeWith Bill Gates and Soros at the Helm

Ever wonder how much a chartered sailboat with 10 crew crossing the Atlantic might cost? Not to mention the cost of airfare to send the crew home and the cost of airfare and time to return the sailboat to it’s port in Europe?   Likely upwards of $150,000 or more. But hey, Greta Thunberg saved one carbon footprint while creating 30 more…

So where did this humble child get the money? How much is her entire campaign costing?   Who is behind angry, angry Greta?

The list is not new, what is new is that in this instance they are ALL together: Bill and Melinda Gates, Open Society, Apple, Starbucks, Coca-cola, Google, Facebook, Buffett, Bono, Business Roundtable, Bloomberg, Caterpillar Foundation, former PM David Cameron, former Secretary of Treasury Lawrence Summers, Bobby Shriver, Twitter, HBO, Verizon, YouTube, Rolling Stone, Merck etc… etc… etc…

Two companies rule: ONE.org, and RED.org. They are interconnected with RED being purchased by ONE.

RED claims they have saved 32 million lives since their founding in 2002, in particular thru Malaria, AIDS and TB – education.

But according to graphs provided by WHO; TB and Malaria cases are lower, but not since 2002, for TB the downward trend began in 1992, for malaria it began in 2000 – and for both the rates have remained relatively stable since then.   AIDS has continued to rise.

The organization ONE claims to be about ending poverty and disease by 2030. The magic year that all politicians proclaim.

RED is all about selling a product through intermediaries while claiming the dollars are fighting disease. GAP, Vanity Fair, The Independent, etc… sell RED products and retain their profit margin. For example a straight donation of $100 to the RED cause might result in about $18 spent for charity.   Corporations make money, shareholders make money all while deducting their charitable gift.   All the while utilizing hundreds of thousands of youth volunteers.

It’s a Hustle of enormous proportions.  And it is all about molding and manipulating the most pliable, uneducated, and naive minds – YOUTH.

And little Greta is a pawn of ONE – albeit a highly paid pawn.

In essence, ONE is a lobbyist group ‘campaigning in the US, Canada, Europe, pounding for media representation, to fight poverty, income inequality and disease.   Nowhere in their form 990 or on their website do they make any claim regarding climate change despite being heavily invested.

According to their Form 990 for 2016, the latest available, their revenue tanked to a mere $16 million from the previous year of over $50million. Their expenses were roughly $36 million of which $6 million was spent on grants and the remainder or 83% was spent on salaries, new construction and design, and overhead. Of the $6 million in grants, $3.5 million of the total grants were made to an ‘affiliate’ of ONE. The remaining amount of the $6.1 million grants was made to their own ‘action lobbying group’, ONE Action in the amount of $2.1 million.   Their fundraising activity lists expenses of nearly $200,000 with $-0- gross receipts, including fees to the LA Entertainment Industry.

In other words, ONE makes no charitable gifts per se to nonaffiliated entities, spends roughly $36 million on expenses including compensation and consulting fees, and supports the cost of manufacturing RED products to be sold at profit by their member companies, such as GAP, Starbucks, etc…, while generating charitable deductions for their partners and paying no taxes.

That’s quite a Ponzi scheme.   All under the guise of helping to eradicate AIDS, Malaria and TB.

The charitable money raised by RED is supposed to be given to the Global Fund, a nonprofit founded with seed money from Bill and Melinda Gates!   Since it’s inception in 2002, the US (the funds largest contributor by far) has given the Global Fund roughly $15 billion out of a total of $46 billion – 32%.   Most of the US contribution came with the approval of Bush and Obama.  Of the total global contribution for 2018 – $6.1 billion, RED contributed $32 million or .5%. The RED contribution is not from the company itself – instead, the corporations who sell RED products contribute 50% of their “Net Profits” from the sale of the products, according to ONE’s website.

What would Greta’s role in all this comprise? Sympathy funding.   ONE’s revenue is covering less than half their expenses. They need new partners and have launched outside their stated IRS and Corporate realm of activity to capitalize on the climate change cult bonanza.

This is who Greta works for.  Everything about her is a ‘creation’, from her appearance, to her script, to her agenda, to her media representation, to her funding.   She is less than a puppet, she is a toy.

Holding her hand is Luisa Newbauer who is the Youth Ambassador for ONE and a member of the Green Party in Germany. It is believed she was first introduced to the clan by Al Gore.  Subsequent to Greta’s rise, her mother received a book deal – it would appear – in exchange for her child.

This is not about climate change, it is not about AIDS, it is not about curing anything, it is about creating wealth pockets, using foundation and NGO tax havens to scheme and skim $$$$$, and promoting an agenda that is no longer simply socialism, it truly has as its end game – Communism.

And we need to stop ALL FUNDING from taxpayer pockets.

American Recovery Act: A PONZI Scheme

IN 2009, as a part and parcel of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, President Obama allocated $14.7 billion to repair and modernize public housing as well as offer tax credits to builders for financing low income housing construction. Today, this portion of the Act is being hailed as a complete failure…

Of course, the failure is not being blamed on the Act or Obama, but on ‘White Contractors’ and racial prejudice.

It is another form of forcible equality in a world that is and always will be ‘unequal’. Knowing that even a newly constructed modern housing development will soon be left to squalor and decay because maintenance is a foreign concept, it is no wonder that neighborhoods clamor to object when their property values will tank in response.

New York is the perfect example of the throw away ideal in which HUD Housing was left to rot, rents were not collected, and buildings became rat infested homes for squatters.   De Blasio’s response was to shutter them and ask for more money to build new ones that would eventually evolve into the exact same state of deterioration. Why? Because maintenance costs money that De Blasio would rather spend on wealthier initiatives…

Of course the other more glaring hypocrisy of this debate is the fact that HUD housing is comprised mostly of whites in poverty as they make up the largest statistic… Oops.   Second are Hispanics, and third are blacks. This reality rather flushes the obtuse racial discrimination claim as an issue and puts it where it belongs – in the twalette. Trying to foment divide based on race is the number one promotion of Mainstream Media.   Obscuring facts, playing roulette with statistics, and downright lying seem to be the new normal. While they claim to represent The People, their journalistic philandering is rife with corruption.

Part of the problem in the forced housing debacle is the ethical concept of ‘earning what you have’ whereby you are actually rewarded for your efforts… A foreign concept any longer. Free income, free upscale housing, free food, free healthcare, free child care, free transportation… well, why bother to earn a living when you can have everything for free?

But the point is the fact that the class integration was just another failed measure of the American Recovery and Investment Act written before Obama took office by unknown drafters, and pushed through almost immediately in 2009. And like Obamacare, it is an abject failure.

Of the $831 billion dollar package, $155 billion was allocated to Healthcare including, building of VA hospitals…, Medicaid, IT , Research and VA Administration. Mired in cost overruns and mismanagement in the VA core, the $2.3 billion was a failed waste. Interestingly, while the VA got $1 billion for hospitals, NIH got $10 billion. With a $31 billion annual budget, NIH has been scrutinized for less than transparent reporting and vague accomplishments.

In 2009, with the additional $10 billion allocation, their one and only target research was, “how voltage ion channels interact with their surroundings”.   The ultimate impact? Research findings provide ‘perspective’ for a new direction of targeted therapeutic development…

Another challenging use of the $10 billion was to research a new method to measure abdominal pain… Because the pain scale that we all know “on a scale of 1 to 10”, wasn’t definitive enough…

Another $100 billion was allocated to Education with the primary use of the funds directed to “prevent layoffs and cutbacks”. Obviously that hasn’t worked very efficiently either given the latest report states that the US is facing a severe crisis due to a shortage of teachers…

So what exactly did this $831 billion accomplish?

$70 billion was allocated for a one year – 2009 – increase in the Alternative Minimum Tax floor… But the annual revenue raised by AMT per year only amounts to about $35 billion…   So, in other words, we spent $70 billion to reduce receipts by about $10 billion or less given it was only the floor that was altered, not a complete repeal of the tax!

Now that was definitely a worthwhile expense. So where did that money actually go?   We are missing an accounting of the use of these funds… Much of the “USES” were subjective, based on a perceived loss of IRS funds based on credits. So while the cost, the $831 billion, was actually charged to taxpayers, the USE was actually never accounted for or disclosed.

Tch, Tch. Nothing more than a covert Ponzi Scheme, only every single American Taxpayer was the victim. Madoff? Nothing by comparison.

NEXT!